Resort Family Businesses: Ummary of Esearch
Resort Family Businesses: Ummary of Esearch
Resort Family Businesses: Ummary of Esearch
Many factors influence the viability of rural family businesses. This study was funded through a grant from USDAs Rural Economic Development Research Initiative. Both quantitative data and actual words of the respondents are included.
Resort Size
The respondents in this study primarily owned resorts with cabins (96%), the remaining 4% having not cabins but either campsites and/or lodges. The average number of cabins per resort was 8.5, with only 39% of resorts having winterized cabins. Forty-one percent of resorts had campsites, with an average of 6.9 campsites; thirty-six percent had hookups. Lodges were not as common among the resorts sampled; only 22% had lodges and just 13% of those were winterized. About half the resorts (55%) were ten acres or less in size, 28% were between 10 and 30 acres; and 17% were over 30 acres. Only 2% of the resorts did not have any lakeshore property; while 26% had 400 feet or less, 34% had between 400 and 799 feet, and 38% had 800 feet of lakeshore or more. Total Cabins Total Cabins Total Campsites None 4% None 59% More than 1-5 16% 10 1 to 5 25% 23% 6-10 11% More than 10 14% Total Lodges None One Two or more Total Acres of Resort 5 or less 6 - 10 11 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 50 Over 50
78% 10% 2%
6 to 10 48%
Total Feet of Lakeshore: None 50 - 199 200 - 399 400 - 599 600 - 799 800 - 999 1000 or more
Non-Family Employees
Many resorts also hired non-family members to assist in the business. The majority of the time those non-family employees numbered less than five and were seasonal, part-time workers. Year Round None 1-5 6-10 More than 10 * Less than 1% Part-Time 89% 9% 2% * Full-Time 91% 7% * 2% Seasonal Part-Time 42% 46% 6% 6% Full-Time 81% 14% 2% 3%
Both genders who operate resorts say that a good reputation with customers is the most important goal and more than two-
Goal Harmonious family relationships Good future for younger family members Balance of family togetherness/apartness Secure retirement resources Good family income
Occupancy Rates
Occupancy information indicates that the majority of the resorts surveyed were seasonal, summeronly type resorts fully operational during June through September. Most of them begin their season sometime during the month of May, probably to accommodate the opening of fishing season, into the fall month of October. About 20% of the resorts were open for some period of time in the winter months. Six of the 337 resorts rented their units during the off-season to local college students as long-term rental units. Open 100% of Month 23% 22% 19% 15% 32% 99% 99% 99% 80% 27% 16% 16% Open Less than 100% 5% 6% 8% 6% 64% 1% 1% 1% 18% 29% 14% 11% Not Open 72% 72% 73% 79% 4% 2% 44% 70% 73% Average Occupancy 37% 41% 31% 18% 34% 71% 87% 80% 40% 26% 19% 26% 90%+ Occupancy 2% 2% 3% 1% 5% 31% 63% 45% 7% 3% 1% 2%
January February March April May June July August September October November December
Services Offered
The resorts surveyed offered a wide range of services to their customers. The seasonal nature of many of the resorts and the states long standing reputation for fishing is reflected in the two most frequently offered services: boat rental (88%) and bait (63%). Other frequently mentioned services were: snack bar (46%), billiard/game room (40%), gift shop (32%), bar (18%), restaurant open to public (16%), and meal service (12%). Boat rental Bait Snack bar Billiard/game room Gift shop Bar Restaurant open to public 88% 63% 46% 40% 32% 18% 16% Meal service Outdoor pool Video rental Ski rental Indoor pool Golf course Mini golf 12% 8% 5% 4% 3% 2% 2%
Legal Ownership
About two-thirds of the resorts surveyed (64%) considered their businesses to be sole ownerships. The two other most common legal ownerships of resorts were partnerships (19%) and Subchapter S-corporations (13%). Sole ownership Partnership Subchapter S-corp C-corporation Other 64% 19% 13% 3% 2%
Business Activities
Activity Resort organizations Local Chamber of Commerce Local tourism group Males 65% 51% 37% Females 64% 46% 31% Almost two-thirds of both the males and females owning resorts are members of resort organizations. About one in two are members of the local Chamber of Commerce, but only about one-third belong to a local tourism group.
Gross Sales
The variation in the size of the resorts surveyed is reflected in the distribution of their gross sales. A quarter of the resort surveyed reported total gross sales from the resort in 1995 to be less than $25,000; 21% had sales of $25,000 to $49,999; 28% had sales in the $50,000 to $99,999 range; and 28% had gross sales in excess of $100,000 (including 4% with $500,000 or more). Under $10,000 $10,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $499,999 $500,000 or more 12% 13% 21% 28% 24% 4%
8% 4% 2% 79% 7%
Social/Civic Activities
Activity Church organizations Community events (fairs, concerts, festivals) Civic organizations Educational organizations Local governing boards Males 53% 34% 18% 14% 16% Females 59% 47% 12% 14% 9% About 50% of females were involved in community events as compared to 34% of males. Males were slightly more involved in civic organizations and local governing boards than females.
Decision Involvement
High Involvement Males Whether to expand Whether to buy equipment Whether to build/remodel cabins Whether to purchase services Whether to make business improvements How to advertise the business Whether to offer new services When to open/close for season How to handle seasonal employment How record keeping is done Whether to borrow money Paying resort business bills Planning/coordinating resort work Whether to seek information about improving the business Whether to reduce time spent in resort business When to get out of the resort business Involvement in business organizations Whether to raise prices *Statistical difference between genders. The couples were asked on a scale of 0 to 6 about their decision involvement for a number of business decisions. High involvement reported here is a combination of the 5 and 6 scores on that scale. For most decisions, there was not a difference between the genders in their level of involvement. The stars indicate when there was a statistically significant difference between the genders. Although the decision involvement percentages are high for both genders, males more than females indicated that they were involved with whether to buy equipment, purchase services, and make business improvements. Females indicated that they were more involved than males in paying resort business bill decisions and in coordinating resort work decisions. 86% 86%* 89% 79%* 88%* 81% 80% 81% 68% 57% 84% 59% 68% 72% 74% 77% 61% 84% Females 83% 72% 87% 65% 84% 78% 79% 78% 77% 69% 79% 69%* 79%* 68% 72% 78% 56% 81%
Task Involvement
Both members of couples were asked how often they participated in a whole list of tasks that needed to be done within the resort business. The percentages indicate the report of each gender for tasks being Done Very Often. The stars indicate where there is a statistically significant difference between the genders in the percent who do that task. Females tend to do much of the daily management of the resort. About two-thirds of the females indicated that they often take reservations, do the day to day on-site tasks, and do the resort housekeeping or cabin cleaning. They are primarily responsible when meal service plans are included with the resort. The building, facility, and grounds maintenance is more often done by the males. Slightly over 50% of males within the resort couples indicated they make major purchases and slightly over 55% of the females reported that they do the bookkeeping. About one-third of each gender reported that they prepare the tax forms. Tasks Bookkeeping Supervising resort work of hired labor Hiring/training employees Resort housekeeping/cabin cleaning Retail sales work Ordering/maintaining inventory Day to day on-site tasks Reservations Special activities management Making major purchases Lawn care & lakeshore planting Pre/post season preparations Facility maintenance Building maintenance Running resort errands Advertising Preparing tax forms Supervising resort work of family member Upkeep of resort furnishings Attend association activities Involvement in community organizations Resorts with Meal Service Plans Menu planning Meal planning Meal clean-up Purchasing supplies for food service *Statistical difference between genders. Done Very Often Males Females 29% 56%* 33% 58%* 23% 55%* 14% 68%* 33% 49%* 27% 57%* 54% 63%* 26% 69%* 1% 26%* 52%* 39% 54%* 15% 76%* 65% 76%* 17% 68%* 11% 48% 43% 36% 40% 31% 36% 25% 32% 48% 43% 19% 17% 21% 15% 5% 6% 6% 0% 72%* 44%* 44%* 68%*
Satisfaction
The biggest gap between the genders is satisfaction with their involvement in resort business decision making. Females are much less satisfied with their decision involvement than are males. Resort family business members are slightly more satisfied with their current financial situation than they were with resort business finances. Only about one in three was satisfied with the balance between work and leisure and females were less satisfied than males.
Current financial situation Balance betw een w ork/leisure Resort business finances Resort decision making involvement Overall success of resort Family life as w hole 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Females Males
PROJECTED CHANGES Prospective Change Remodel cabins Purchase additional equipment Build new cabins Utilize Internet sources Computerize records Add services or recreational activities Retire Change marketing strategies Sell the business Add employees Purchase more land Diversify services Take an off-resort job Develop a resort transfer plan Quit an off-resort job Reduce employees Males 69% 52% 35% 34% 30% 31% 22% 25% 19% 17% 17% 16% 13% 13% 12% 1% Females 67% 47% 31% 28% 32% 29% 25% 19% 25% 21% 11% 12% 14% 10% 11% 2%
The top three changes that resort owners indicated they would make in the next five years were related to expansion or improvements. Those changes included remodeling cabins, purchasing new equipment, and building new cabins. However, the next group of changes indicate a movement toward use of more technological innovations. About 30% indicated they would begin to utilize Internet sources or computerize records. About one in four indicated that they would be retiring and selling the resort business within the next five years.
10
PRIMARY INCOME
For just over half the resorts (56%) the respondents reported that the resort income was the primary source of income that covered household and personal expenses. About a third (32%) considered an off-resort income the primary source of income; and 12% stated other sources (such as retirement income) to be their primary income source.
Off-Resort Work
Nearly half the time (48% neither the male nor female respondent nor their spouses had jobs away from the resort. About a third of the time either the male or female worked away from the resort; while 22% of the time both had outside employment. These figures coincide closely with the information regarding the primary income source.
Male only 20%
Neither 47%
Provide basic household necessities Having greater financial security To have money for themselves Money for extra things Meeting basic resort expenses
11
14
16
17
Age of Respondent
Over 65 years 12% 20-35 years 8% 36-45 years 22%
The University of Minnesota and the Family Social Science Department within the College of Human Ecology extends its thanks and appreciation to all Minnesota resort couples who participated in this survey. Special thanks goes to the following organizations and individuals whose time, effort, or funding made this survey possible: USDA, University of Minnesota Extension Service, Minnesota State Department of Tourism, Tourism Center University of Minnesota Extension Service, University of Minnesota Students: Catherine Huddleston-Casas, Ronit Leichtentritt, Allison Sunquist, and Research Associate: Susan Keskinen.
This material is based upon work supported by Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture under Agreement No. 95-37401-1820. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
To obtain additional copies of the survey report, contact Minnesota Rural Family Business Project, University of Minnesota, 275C McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Avenue, St Paul MN 55108. (612) 625-3732. E-mail: sdanes@che2.che.umn.edu
18