Memory Aid
Memory Aid
Memory Aid
1 M EMORY A ID IN P OLITICAL L AW
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
IN GENERAL CONSTITUTION - the document which serves as the fundamental law of the state. (V. Sinco, Philippine Political Law, 11th ed., p.6870); that written instrument enacted by direct action of the people by which the fundamental powers of the government are established, limited and defined, and by which those powers are distributed among the several departments for their safe and useful exercise for the benefit of the body politic (Malcolm, Philippine Constitutional Law, p.6) Classification: 1. written (conventional or enacted) v. unwritten (cumulative or evolved). 2. rigid v. flexible The Philippine Constitution is written and rigid. (Art. XVII) The 1987 Constitution took effect on February 2, 1987, the date of the plebiscite for its ratification and not on the date its ratification was proclaimed. (De Leon v. Esguerra, 153 SCRA 602) Interpretation: a doubtful provision shall be examined in the light of the history of the times and the conditions and circumstances under which the Constitution was framed (Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317). In case of doubt, the provisions should be considered self-executing; mandatory rather directory; and prospective rather than retroactive (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p.3) CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - designates the law embodied in the Constitution and the legal principles growing out of the interpretation and application of its provisions by the courts in specific cases (Sinco, supra, p.67) STATE - A community of persons, more or less numerous, permanently occupying a definite portion of territory, independent of external control, and possessing a government to which a great body of the inhabitants render habitual obedience; a politically organized sovereign community independent of outside control bound by ties of nationhood, legally supreme within its territory, acting through a government functioning under a regime of law. (CIR v. Campos Rueda, 42 SCRA 23). Elements: People inhabitants of the State, the number of which is capable for selfsufficiency and self-defense; of both sexes for perpetuity. Different meanings of the word people: -People as inhabitants (Sec.1, Art.XIII; Secs.15 -16, Art. II; Sec.2, Art.III); -People as citizens (Preamble; Secs. 1 and 4, Art. II; Sec.7, Art. III); -People as electors (Sec.4, Art. VII; Sec.2, Art. XVI; Sec. 25, Art. XVIII). Territory fixed portion of the surface of the earth inhabited by the people of the State; see Art I. Sovereignty supreme and uncontrollable power inherent in a State by which that State is governed; Characteristics: a. permanent b. exclusive c. comprehensive d. absolute e. indivisible f. inalienable g. imprescriptible
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
Theory of Auto-Limitation - any state may by its consent, express or implied, submit to a restriction of its sovereign rights. There may thus be a curtailment of what otherwise is a power plenary in character. (Reagan v. CIR, G.R. No. L-26379. Dec. 27, 1969). Imperium - the states authority to govern embraced in the concept of sovereignty; includes passing laws governing a territory, maintaining peace and order over it, and defending it against foreign invasion. Dominium - capacity of the state to own or acquire property. (Lee Hong Hok v. David, 48 SCRA 372) Effect of Belligerent Occupation No change in sovereignty. However, political laws, except those of treason, are suspended; municipal laws remain in force unless changed by the belligerent occupant. principle of jus postliminium At the end of the occupation, political laws are automatically revived. (Peralta v. Director of Prisons, 75 Phil. 285) Effect of Change of Sovereignty The political laws of the former sovereign, whether compatible or not with those of the new sovereign, are automatically abrogated, unless they are expressly re-enacted by affirmative act of the new sovereign. Municipals laws remain in force. (Macariola v. Asuncion, 114 SCRA 77) Jurisdiction manifestation of sovereignty Territorial authority to have all persons and things within its territorial limits to be completely subject to its control and protection.
C HAIRPERSONS
Personal - authority over its nationals, their persons, property, and acts, whether within or outside its territory. Extraterritorial authority over persons, things or acts, outside its territorial limits by reason of their effects to its territory. Government that institution or aggregate of institutions by which an independent society makes and carries out those rules of action which are necessary to enable men to live in a social state or which are imposed upon the people forming that society by those who possess the power or authority of prescribing them. (US v. Dorr, 2 Phil. 332). Government of the Republic of the Philippines is the corporate governmental entity through which the functions of government are exercised throughout the Philippines, including the various arms which political authority is made effective, whether pertaining to the autonomous regions, the provincial, city or barangay subdivisions or other forms of local government. [Sec. 2(1), E.O. 292 or the Administrative Code of 1987] Classification: De jure has a rightful title but no power or control, either, because same has been withdrawn from it or because same has not yet actually entered into the exercise thereof. De facto actually exercises power or control but without legal title (Lawyers League for a Better Philippines v. Aquino, G.R. No. 73748, May 22, 1986). De facto proper government that gets possession and control of, or usurps, by force or by the voice of the majority, the rightful legal government and maintains
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Two stages: determination of the authority of the plaintiff to exercise the power and the propriety of its exercise; and determination of just compensation. Requisites: 1. Necessity when exercised by: Congress political question; Delegate justiciable question 2. Private property all private property capable of ownership may be expropriated, except money and choses in action; may include services (Republic v. PLDT, 26 SCRA 620). 3. Taking: there is taking when: i. owner actually deprived or dispossessed of his property;
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
ii. there is practical destruction or a material impairment of value of property; iii. owner is deprived of ordinary use of his property; and iv. owner is deprived of jurisdiction, supervision and control of his property. requisites: i. expropriator must enter a private property; ii. entry must be more than a momentary period; iii. entry must be under a warrant or color of authority; iv. property must be devoted to public use or otherwise informally appropriated or injuriously affected; v. utilization of the property must be in such a way as to oust the owner and deprive him of beneficial enjoyment of the property (Republic v. Castelvi, 58 SCRA 336). 4. Public use - has been broadened to include not only uses directly available to the public but also those which redound to their indirect benefit; that only a few would actually benefit from the expropriation of the property foes not necessarily diminish the essence and character of public use (Manosca v. Court of Appeals, 252 SCRA 412). Once expropriated change of public use is of no moment. It is well within the rights of the condemnor as owner to alter and decide its use so long as it still for public use. (Republic vs. C.A., G.R. No. 146587, July 2, 2002) 5. Just compensation compensation is qualified by the word just to convey that equivalent must be real, substantial, full and fair; the value of the property must be determined either as of the date of the taking of the property or the filing of the complaint, whichever came first. (Eslaban v. vda. De Onorio, G.R. No. 146062, June 28, 2001)
Formula: -- fair market value of the property, to which must be added the consequential damages, minus the consequential benefits, but in no case will the consequential benefits exceed the consequential damages Fair market value the price that maybe agreed upon by parties who are willing but are not compelled to enter into a contract of sale. Consequential damages consist of injuries directly caused on the residue of the private property taken by reason of expropriation 6. Due process of law the defendant must be given an opportunity to be heard. III. POWER OF TAXATION - power by which State raises revenue to defray necessary expenses of the Government. Scope: covers persons, property, or occupation to be taxed within taxing jurisdiction Basis: power emanating from necessity (lifeblood theory) Who may exercise: generally, the legislature but also: Law-making bodies of LGUs (Sec.5, Art. X); and The President, under Sec. 28 (2), Art. VI of the Constitution or as incident of emergency powers that Congress may grant to him under Sec. 23(2), Art. VI. Limitations on the Power of Taxation: Inherent limitations Public purpose; a. Non-delegability of power; b. Territoriality or situs of taxation; c. Exemption of government from taxation; d. International comity. Constitutional limitations a. Due process of law; b. Equal protection of law;
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Double Taxation additional taxes are laid: 1. on the same subject; 2. by the same taxing jurisdiction; during the same taxing period; and 3. for the same purpose. Despite lack of specific constitutional prohibition, double taxation will not be allowed if the same will result in a violation of the equal protection clause (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p.38). TAX LICENSE FEE
1. as to basis Power of taxation to raise revenue Police power to regulate
2. limitation Rate or amount to be collected unlimited provided not confiscatory. Amount limited to cost of: (a) issuing the license and (b) necessary inspection or police surveillance.
3. object Imposed on persons or property. Paid for privilege of doing something but privilege is revocable.
4. effect of non-payment Business or activity does not become illegal. Business becomes illegal.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
DISTINCTIONS
POLICE POWER
1. Regulates both liberty and property 2. Exercised only by the Government 3. Public necessity and the right of the state and of the public to selfpreservation and selfprotection. 4. Property intended for a noxious purpose is taken and destroyed. 5. Compensa tion is the intangible, altruistic feeling that the individual has contributed to the public good 6. Contracts may be impaired.
EMINENT DOMAIN
Affects only property rights Maybe exercised by private entities Necessity of the public for the use of private property
TAXATION
1. Affects only property rights Exercised only by the Government Public necessity 2.
POLICE POWER
Lawful subject Lawful means
EMINENT DOMAIN
1. 2. 3. 4. Necessity Private property; Taking; . Public use; Just compensation; Due process of law.
When exercised by a delegate: 3. 4. 5. Express grant by law Within the territorial limits Must not be contrary to law
5. 6.
Property is wholesome and is devoted to public use or purpose Compensati on is full and fair equivalent of the property taken
Property is wholesome and is devoted to public use or purpose Compensatio n is the protection and public improvemen ts instituted by the government for the taxes paid Contracts may not be impaired.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang(VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics). Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
3. 4.
5. 6.
vessels engaged in non-commercial activities; Acts of states; Foreign merchant vessels exercising their rights of innocent passage or involuntary entry, such as arrival under distress; Foreign armies passing through or stationed in its territory with its permission; and Such other persons and property, over which the state may, by agreement, waive jurisdiction (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, 1996 ed., p. 18). Article II : PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES
the
Exceptions (Permissible Delegation): (PETAL) 1. Tariff powers of the President [Sec. 28 (2), Art. VI] 2. Emergency powers of President [Sec. 23 (2), Art. VI] 3. Delegation to the people [Sec. 32, Art. VI; Sec. 10, Art. X; Sec. 2, Art. XVII; RA 6753]. 4. Delegation to Local Government units (Art X; RA 7160); and 5. Delegation to administrative bodies (power of subordinate legislation). Tests for Valid Delegation: Completeness test law must be complete in all essential terms and conditions so that there is nothing for delegate to do except enforce it; Sufficient standard test map out the boundaries of delegates authority by defining legislative policy and indicating circumstances under which it is to be pursued (Pelaez v. Auditor General, 15 SCRA 569). III. STATE PRINCIPLES REGARDING FOREIGN POLICY (SEC. 2, ART. II) 1. renounces war as an instrument of national policy; 2. incorporation clause adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land; and 3. adheres to the policy of peace, equality, justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations. IV. SUPREMACY OF CIVILIAN AUTHORITY (SEC. 3, ART. II) Ensured by: 1. the installation of the President, the highest civilian authority as the commander-in-chief of the military [Sec. 18, Art. VII];
I. SEPARATION OF POWERS Purpose: to prevent concentration of authority in one person or group of persons that might lead to irreparable error or abuse in exercise to the detriment of republican institutions. (Pangasinan Transportation Co. v. Public Service Commission, G.R. No. 47065. June 26, 1940) Principle of Blending of Powers instance when powers are not confined exclusively within one department but are assigned to or shared by several departments. (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, 2000 ed., p. 42). Principle of Checks and Balances allows one department to resist encroachments upon its prerogatives or to rectify mistakes or excess committed by the other departments. II. DELEGATION OF POWERS General Rule: Potestas delegata non potest delegare - premised on the ethical principle that delegated power constitutes not only a right but a duty to be performed by the delegate through the instrumentality of his own
C HAIRPERSONS
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Classification of Rights: 1. Political rights granted by law to members of community in relation to their direct or indirect participation in the establishment
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
10
2.
3. 4.
or administration of the government; Civil rights rights which municipal law will enforce at the instance of private individuals, for the purpose of securing them the enjoyment of their means of happiness; Social and economic rights; and Human rights.
I. DUE PROCESS OF LAW That which hears before it condemns, which proceeds upon inquiry and renders judgment only after trial (Darmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheaton 518).
Requisites of Criminal due process [Sec. 14 (1), Art. III]: a. accused has been heard in a court of competent jurisdiction; b. accused is proceeded against under the orderly processes of law; c. accused is given notice and opportunity to be heard; and d. judgment rendered within authority of constitutional law (Mejia v. Pamaran, 160 SCRA 457). Requisites of Administrative Due Process: a. right to a hearing, which includes the right to present ones case and support evidence in support thereof; b. tribunal must consider evidence adduced; c. decision must have something to support itself; d. evidence must be substantial; e. decision must be based on evidence adduced, or at least contained in the records and disclosed to the parties; f. independent consideration of evidence, and not rely on the recommendation of a subordinate; and g. the decision must state the facts and the law in such a way that the parties can know the issues involved and the reasons for the decision (Ang Tibay v. CIR, 69 Phil 635). Requisites of Due Process for Students before Imposition of Disciplinary Sanctions: a. must be informed in writing of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; b. right to answer charges against him, with the assistance of counsel, if desired; c. informed of the evidence against him; d. right to adduce evidence in his behalf;
Aspects of Due Process: 1. Substantive due process Requisites: a. the Interest of the public in general, as distinguished from that of a particular class require the intervention of the state; b. means employed are reasonably necessary for accomplishment of purpose and not unduly oppressive. - Publication of laws is part of substantive due process (Taada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446). 2. Procedural due process Requisites of Civil Procedural due process: a. an impartial court or tribunal clothed with judicial power to hear and determine matters before it; b. jurisdiction properly acquired over person of defending and over property which is subject matter of proceeding; c. opportunity to be heard; d. judgment rendered upon lawful hearing and based on evidence adduced (Banco Espaol Filipino v. Palanca, G.R. No. L-11390. March 26, 1918.)
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
WARRANT OF ARREST
It is not necessary that the judge should personally examine the complainant and his witnesses (Soliven v. Makasiar, 167 SCRA 393); the judge would simply personally review the initial determination of the prosecutor to see if it is supported by substantial evidence; he merely determines the probability, not the certainty of the accused and, in so doing, he need not conduct a de novo hearing (Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652)
1. Such classification rests upon substantial distinctions; 2. It is germane to purpose of the law; 3. It is not confined to existing conditions; 4. It applies equally to all members of the same class. (People v. Vera, G.R. No. 45685. November 16, 1937). III. SEARCHES AND SEIZURES (SEC. 2, ART. III) Scope: a popular right and hence, protects all persons, including aliens (Qua Chee Gan v. Deportation Board, 9 SCRA 27) and, to a limited extent, artificial persons. (Bache & Co., Inc. v. Ruiz, 37 SCRA 825) Requisites of Valid Warrant: 1. Probable Cause Such facts and circumstances antecedent to the issuance of a warrant that in themselves are sufficient to induce a cautious man to rely on them and act in pursuance thereof (People v. Syjuco, 64
3. After personally examining under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witness he may produce; 4. On the basis of their personal knowledge of the facts they are testifying to; 5. The warrant must describe particularly the place to be searched
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
12
WARRANT OF ARREST
General warrants are proscribed and unconstitutional (Nolasco v. Puno, 139 SCRA 152); However, a John Doe Warrant (a warrant for the apprehension of a person whose true name is unknown) satisfies the constitutional requirement of particularity if there is some descrpitio personae which will enable the officer to identify the accused (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 73)
person to be arrested has committed it; and 3. when a person to be arrested is an escapee or detention prisoner. (Sec. 5, Rule 113, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure) - An application for or admission to bail shall not bar the accused from challenging the validity of his arrest, provided that he raises them before entering his plea. (Sec. 26, Rule 114, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure) Warrantless Searches, When Valid: 1. when right has been voluntarily waived (People v. Malasugui, 63 Phil 221); 2. as an incident to a lawful arrest, provided search is contemporaneous to arrest and within permissible area of search (see Sec. 13, Rule 126, Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure); a valid arrest must precede the search; the process cannot be reversed. (People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432). 3. searches of vessel and aircraft for violation of fishery, immigration and customs laws (Roldan v. Arca, 65 SCRA 336); 4. searches of automobiles at borders or constructive borders for violation of immigration and smuggling laws (Papa v. Mago, 22 SCRA 857); 5. Inspection of buildings and other premises for the enforcement of fire, sanitary and building regulations; 6. Visual search at checkpoints (Valmonte vs. de Villa, 178 SCRA 211); 7. Conduct of areal target zoning and saturation drive in the exercise of military powers of the President (Guazon v. de Villa, 181 SCRA 623); 8. When there is a genuine reason to stop-and-frisk in the light of the police officers experience and surrounding conditions to warrant a belief that the person detained has weapons concealed (Malacat v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 123595,
AND
Commissioner of Immigration and Deportation may issue warrant only for purpose of carrying out a final decision of deportation (CID v. Judge De la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853) or there is sufficient proof of guilt of an alien (Harvey v. DefensorSantiago, G.R. No. 82544, June 28, 1988).
Exclusionary Rule Evidence obtained in violation of Sec. 2, Art. III, shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceedings (Fruit of a Poisonous Tree Doctrine) (Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383) Warrantless Arrest, When Valid 1. when person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense; 2. when a. an offense has just been committed; and b. he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the
C HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
14
a. a private place; b. the campus of a governmentowned or operated educational institution; or c. a freedom park. [B.P. Blg. 880 (The Public Assembly Act of 1985)]. VI. FREEDOM OF RELIGION (SEC. 5, ART. III) 1. Non-establishment clause Scope: a. State cannot set-up church; b. Cannot pass laws which aid one religion, all religions or prefer one over another; c. Nor influence a person to go to or remain away from church against his will; nor d. Force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion (Martin, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 39) Freedom of religious belief and worship Dual aspect of freedom of religious belief and worship: a. b. Freedom to believe absolute; and Freedom to act on ones belief subject to regulation.
VIII. RIGHT TO INFORMATION (SEC. 7, ART. III) Rights guaranteed: 1. Right to information to matters of public concern; and 2. Corollary right of access to official records and documents. These are political rights that are available to citizens only. (Bernas, Philippine Constitution, p. 85) IX. RIGHT TO (SEC. 8, ART. III FORM ASSOCIATIONS
Right to form association shall not be impaired without due process of law; Also guarantees the right not to join an association.
2.
X. NON-IMPAIRMENT OF CONTRACTS (SEC. 10, ART. III) Impairment anything that diminishes the efficacy of contract Limitations: 1. police power prevails over contracts. 2. eminent domain may impair obligations of contracts. 3. taxation cannot impair obligation of contracts. XI. RIGHTS OF AN ACCUSED UNDER CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION (SEC. 12, ART. III 1. right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to counsel; Rationale: a. to make him aware of it; b. to overcome the inherent pressure of the interrogating atmosphere; and c. to show the individual that his interrogators are prepared to recognize his privilege should he choose to invoke it.
AND
VII. LIBERTY OF ABODE (SEC. 6, ART. III) Limitations: 1. Liberty of abode - lawful order of the court 2. Right to travel a. In the interest of national security, public safety, public health, as may be provided by law; b. any person on bail (Silverio vs. CA, G.R. No. 94284. April 8, 1991.)
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
16
to a person who is under investigation in connection with an offense he is suspected to have committed. What rights may be waived: 1. the right to remain silent; 2. the right to counsel. Waiver must be in writing and in the presence of counsel. What rights cannot be waived: 1. the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to counsel; 2. the right to counsel when making the waiver of the right to remain silent or to counsel. Rights of Person Suspected and Subsequently Charged: 1. Before case is filed in court/prosecutor for preliminary investigation but after being put into custody to or otherwise deprived of liberty, and on being interrogated by police: a. to remain silent; b. to be informed thereof; c. not to be subjected to force, violence, threat, or intimidation which vitiates free will; d. to have evidence obtained in violation of these rights inadmissible as evidence. 2. After the case is filed in court: a. to refuse to be witness against himself; b. not to have prejudice imputed on him as a result of such refusal; c. to testify on his behalf; d. to cross-examination; e. while testifying, to refuse questions which tend to incriminate him for some crime other than present charge.
XII. RIGHT TO BAIL (SEC. 13, ART. III) BAIL - security given for the release of a person in custody of law, furnished by him or a bondsman, to guarantee his appearance before any court as required under conditions specified under the rules of court. (see Sec. 1, Rule 114, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure). - The right to bail may be invoked once detention commences even if no formal charges have yet to be filed (Teehankee v. Rovira, 75 Phil. 634). - Suspension of the writ of habeas corpus does not suspend right to bail [Sec.13, Art.III]. - Even when the accused has previously jumped bail, still he cannot be denied bail before conviction if it is a matter of right. The remedy is to increase the amount of bail. (Sy Guan v. Amparo, G.R. No. L-1771. December 4, 1947); BAIL, A MATTER OF RIGHT (RULE 114, SEC. 4)
All persons in custody shall be admitted to bail as a matter of right, with sufficient sureties, or be released on recognizance as prescribed by law or this rule: (a.) Before or after conviction by the MTC, and (b.) Before conviction of the RTC of an offense not punishable by death, reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Hearing: whether bail is a matter of right or of discretion, reasonable notice of hearing is required to be given the prosecutor, or at least he must be asked for his recommendation, because in fixing the amount of bail, the judge is required to take into account a number of factors (Cortes v. Judge Catral, A.M. No. RTJ-97-1387, September 10, 1997). Standards for fixing amount of bail: 1. financial ability of accused; 2. nature and circumstances of offense; 3. penalty for offense; 4. character and reputation of accused; 5. age and health of accused; 6. weight of evidence against him; 7. probability of his appearance at trial; 8. forfeiture of other bail;
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
18
The proof against him must survive the test of reason; the strongest suspicion must not be permitted to sway judgment. (People v. Austria, 195 SCRA 700) 6.
Impartial accused entitled to cold neutrality of an impartial judge. Public to prevent possible abuses which may be committed against the accused. Right to meet witness face to face
Equipoise or Equiponderance of Evidence evidence of both sides are equally balanced. Effect in criminal prosecution: acquittal of accused because it is insufficient to overcome presumption of innocence. 3. Right to be heard by himself and counsel The accused is amply accorded legal assistance extended by a counsel who commits himself to the cause of the defense and acts accordingly; an efficient and truly decisive legal assistance, and not simply a perfunctory representation (People v. Bermas, G.R. No. 120420, April 21, 1999). Right to counsel during the trial is not subject to waiver (Flores v. Ruiz, 90 SCRA 428). Right to be informed of nature and cause of accusation against him; Description not designation of the offense is controlling.
Right to compulsory process to secure attendance of witnesses and production of evidence; Trial in absentia
8.
4.
Void-for-vagueness rule accused is denied the right to be informed of the charge against him, and to due process as well, where the statute itself is couched in such indefinite language that it is not possible for men of ordinary intelligence to determine therefrom what acts or omissions are punished and, hence shall be avoided (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 131). 5. Right to speedy, impartial and public trial; Speedy free from vexatious, capricious and oppressive delays;
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Tax is not a debt since it is an obligation arising from law hence its non-payment maybe validly punished with imprisonment.
XXI. DOUBLE JEOPARDY (SEC. 21, ART. III) Requisites: 1. valid complaint or information; 2. filed before competent court;
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
20
3. 4.
to which defendant has pleaded; and defendant was previously acquitted or convicted or the case dismissed or otherwise terminated without his express consent (People v. Ylagan, 58 Phil 851)
Two types: 1. No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense; 2. If an act is punishable by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to another prosecution for the same act.
1. graver offense developed due to supervening facts arising from the same act or omission; 2. facts constituting graver offense arose or discovered only after filing of former complaint or information; and 3. plea of guilty to lesser offense was made without the consent of prosecutor or offended party (People v. Judge Villarama, 210 SCRA 246). Reopening of Kuratong Baleleng Cases: The new rule (Rule117, Sec 8) has fixed a time-bar of one year or two years for the revival of criminal cases provisionally dismissed with the express consent of the accused and with a priori notice to the offended party. The time-bar cannot be applied retroactively in 1999 when the cases were dismissed for to so, the state shall effectively have less than two years to reopen the case because the rule only took effect in December 2000. This would prevent absurd results and injustice to the Sate. (People, et al. vs. Panfilo Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, April 1, 2003)
XXII. EX POST FACTO LAW AND BILL OF ATTAINDER (SEC. 22 ART. III) EX POST FACTO LAW Kinds: 1. law making an act criminal which was not before its passage; 2. law aggravating penalty for crime committed before passage; 3. law inflicting greater or more severe penalty; 4. law altering legal rules of evidence and receive less or different testimony than law required at time of commission, in order to convict accused; 5. law assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposes a penalty 6. of deprivation of right for something which when done was lawful; 7. law depriving accused of some lawful protection to which he had been
AND
Conviction of accused shall NOT bar another prosecution for an offense which necessarily includes the offense originally charged when:
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
22
2. resided in the Philippines for not less than 10 years; may be reduced to 5 years, if: a.honorably held office in the Philippines; b. established new industry or introduced a useful invention; c. married to a Filipino woman; d. engaged as teacher in Philippine public or private school not established for exclusive instruction to particular nationality or race, or in any of branches of education or industry for a period of not less than 2 years; and e. born in the Philippines; 3. character: a. good moral character; b. believes in the Constitution; c. conducted himself in an irreproachable conduct during his stay in the Philippines; 4. Own real estate in the Philippines not less than P5,000 in value; or have some lucrative trade, profession or lawful occupation that can support himself and his family; 5. Speak and write English or Filipino and any principal Philippine dialects; (as amended by Sec. 6 Art. XIV); and 6. Enrolled minor children in any public or private school recognized by government where Philippine history, government and civics are taught as part of curriculum, during the entire period of residence prior to hearing of petition. Declaration of Intention must be filed with the Office of the Solicitor General one year before filing of application for naturalization. Exception: a. Those born in the Philippines and received primary and secondary education in a Philippine school; b. Those who have resided in the Philippines for thirty years; c. The widow or children of the applicant who died before his application was granted.
Disqualification for Naturalization: a. opposed to organized government or affiliated with any association or group of persons who uphold and teach doctrines opposing all organized governments; b. defending or teaching necessity or propriety of violence, personal assault or assassination for the success or predominance of their ideas; c. polygamists or believers in polygamy; d. suffering from mental alienation or incurable contagious disease; e. convicted of crime involving moral turpitude; f. who during residence in the Philippines have not mingled socially with Filipinos, or not evinced sincere desire to learn and embrace customs, traditions and ideals of Filipinos; g. citizens or subjects of nations with whom the Philippines is at war, during the period of such war; h. citizens or subjects of foreign country whose laws do not grant Filipinos right to become naturalized citizens or subjects thereof (no reciprocity). Effects of Naturalization : 1. ON THE WIFE vests citizenship on wife who might herself be lawfully naturalized; She need not prove her qualifications but only that she is not disqualified. (Moy Ya Lim Yao v. Comm. of Immigration, 41 SCRA 292). 2. ON THE MINOR CHILDREN (i) If born in the Philippines automatically becomes a citizen; If born abroad
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Doctrine of Indelible Allegiance an individual may be compelled to retain his original nationality notwithstanding that he has already renounced or forfeited it under the laws of the second state whose nationality he has acquired. III. LOSS OF PHILIPPINE CITIZENSHIP: (CA 63) (C2 RAND) 1. Naturalization in a foreign country; 2. Express renunciation of citizenship (expatriation); The mere application or possession of an alien certificate of registration does not amount to renunciation (Mercado vs. Manzano, G.R. No. 135083, May 26, 1999) 3. Subscribing to an oath of allegiance to constitution or laws of foreign upon attaining of 21 years of age; Citizens may not divest citizenship when Philippines is at war. 4. Rendering service to or accepting commission in the armed forces of a foreign country; 5. Cancellation of certificate of naturalization; 6. Having been declared by final judgment a deserter of Philippines Armed Forces in times of war. General Rule: Res judicata does not set in citizenship cases. Exception: 1. persons citizenship is resolved by court or an administrative body as a material issue in the controversy, after a fullblown hearing; 2. with the active participation of the Solicitor General or his representative; and 3. finding of his citizenship is affirmed by the Supreme Court.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
24
IV. REACQUISITION OF CITIZENSHIP 1. By naturalization; 2. By repatriation; RA 8171 is an act providing for the repatriation of: a. Filipino women who have lost their Philippine citizenship by marriage to aliens and; b. natural-born Filipinos who have lost their Philippine citizenship on account or political or economic necessity. The applicant should not be a: a. Person opposed to organized government or affiliated with any association or group of persons who uphold and teach doctrines opposing organized government; b. Person defending or teaching the necessity or propriety of violence, personal assault, or association for the predominance of their ideas; c. Person convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude: or d. Person suffering from mental alienation or incurable contagious diseases. Repatriation shall be effected by taking the necessary oath of allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines and registration in the proper civil registry and in the Bureau of Immigration. The Bureau of Immigration shall thereupon cancel the pertinent alien certificate of registration and issue the certificate of identification as Filipino citizen to the repatriated citizen.
RA 9225 also known as the "Citizenship Retention and Re-acquisition Act of 2003," approved on August 29, 2003 provides that, upon taking the oath of allegiance to the Republic: a. Natural born citizens of the Philippines who have lost their Philippine citizenship by reason of their naturalization as citizens of a foreign country are deemed to have re-acquired Philippine citizenship; and b. Natural born citizens of the Philippines who, after the effectivity of the said RA become citizens of a foreign country shall retain their Philippine citizenship. Derivative Citizenship - The unmarried child, whether legitimate, illegitimate or adopted, below eighteen (18) years of age, of those who re-acquire Philippine citizenship upon effectivity of the said RA shall be deemed citizens of the Philippines. V. DUAL ALLEGIANCE (Sec. 5, Art. IV) DUAL CITIZENSHIP
1. Arises when, as a result of concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states, a person is simultaneously considered a national by said states. 2. Involuntary
DUAL ALLEGIANCE
1. Refers to the situation where a person simultaneously owes, by some positive act, loyalty to two or more states.
Allows the person to recover or return to his original status before he lost his Philippine citizenship (Bengzon III v. HRET, G.R. No. 142840, May 7, 2001) 3. By direct act of Congress.
C HAIRPERSONS
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Article V : SUFFRAGE I. SUFFRAGE - right to vote in elections. Who may exercise (Sec. 1, Art. V) 1. all citizens of the Philippines, not otherwise disqualified by law; 2. at least 18 years of age 3. resided in the Philippines for at least one year; and 4. resided in the place they propose to vote for at least 6 months immediately preceding the election. II. RESIDENCE - has dual meaning (Sec.1, Art. V): First as a requirement of residence in the Philippines: synonymous with domicile imports both intention to reside and personal presence coupled with conduct indicative of such intention. Second requirement of residence in the place where one intends to vote: can mean domicile or temporary residence Requisites of Acquisition of Domicile by Choice: 1. residence or bodily presence in the new locality; 2. an intention to remain there; and 3. an intention to abandon the old residence. (Gallego v. Verra, 73 Phil. 453) III. THE OVERSEAS ABSENTEE VOTING ACT OF 2003 (R.A. 9189) 1. Definition of Terms Absentee Voting - the process by which qualified citizens of the Philippines abroad exercise their right to vote; Overseas Absentee Voter - a citizen of the Philippines who is qualified to register and vote under this Act, not otherwise disqualified by law, who is abroad on the day of elections. 2. Coverage all citizens of the Philippines abroad, who are not
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
26
country. Failure to return shall be the cause for the removal of the name of the immigrant or permanent resident from the National Registry of Absentee Voters and his/her permanent disqualification to vote in absentia. e. Any citizen of the Philippines abroad previously declared insane or incompetent by competent authority in the Philippines or abroad, as verified by the Philippine embassies, consulates or foreign service establishments concerned, unless such competent authority subsequently certifies that such person is no longer insane or incompetent. Article VI : LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT I. LEGISLATIVE POWER 1. power to propose, enact, amend and repeal laws. 2. Vested in Congress, except to the extent reserved to the people by provision on initiative and referendum. The Peoples Participation in the Government Consist of: 1. Suffrage 2. Plebiscite a. Ratifying the Constitution [Sec.27, Art. XVIII]; b. Approving any amendment thereto [Sec.4, Art.XVII]; c. Approving any changes in boundaries of LGUs, mergers, divisions, or abolitions of LGUs [Sec.10, Art.X]; d. Creating metropolitan authorities [Sec.11, Art.X]; e. Creating autonomous regions [Sec.18, Art.X]. 3. Referendum and Initiative
Initiative power of the people to propose amendments to the Constitution or to propose and enact legislation through an election called for the purpose. Classes of initiative: 1. Initiative on the Constitution petition proposing amendments to the Constitution; 2. Initiative on Statutes petition proposing to enact a national legislation; 3. Initiative on Local Legislation petition proposing to enact a regional, provincial, city, municipality or barangay law, resolution or ordinance. Limitations: 1. power of local initiative shall not be exercised more than once a year; 2. initiatives shall extend only to subjects or matters which are within the legal powers of the local legislative bodies to enact; 3. if at anytime before the initiative is held, the local legislative body shall adopt in toto the proposition presented, the initiative shall be cancelled. Limitation on Local Legislative Body vis-a-vis Local Initiative: Any proposition or ordinance approved through an initiative and referendum shall not be repealed, modified or amended by the sanggunian within 6 months from the date of approval thereof, and may be amended , modified or repealed within 3 years thereafter by a vote of of all its members. In case of barangays, the period shall be 18 months after approval. (Sec. 125, RA 7160) Indirect Initiative exercise of initiative by the people through a proposition sent to Congress or the local legislative body for action.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
2. Must be a resident of his legislative district for at least 1 year immediately before the election 3. Elected personally, i.e. by name.
3. Voted upon by party or organization. It is only when a party is entitled to representation that it designates who will sit as representative. 4. If he/she changes party or affiliation, loses his seat, in which case he/she will be substituted by another qualified person in the party / organization based on the list submitted to the COMELEC 5. In case of vacancy, a substitution will be made within the party, based on the list submitted to the COMELEC. 6. A party-list representative cannot sit if he ran and lost in the previous election.
DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE
1. Elected according to legislative district by the
5. In case of vacancy, a special election may be held provided that the vacancy takes place at least 1 year before the next election. 6. A district representative is not prevented from running again as a district
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
28
representative if he/she lost during the previous election. 7. A change in affiliation within 6 months prior to election does not prevent a district representative from running under his new party. 7. A change in affiliation within 6 months prior to election prohibits the party-list representative from sitting as representative under his new party or organization.
III. APPORTIONMENT OF LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT [Sec. 5 (3) and (4), Art. VI] 1. Maintain proportional representation based on number of inhabitants; Each city with not less than 250 thousand inhabitants, entitled to at least one (1) representative; Each province, irrespective of the number of inhabitants, entitled to at least one (1) representative. 2. Each district must be contiguous, compact and adjacent. Gerrymandering is not allowed; Gerrymandering formation of one legislative district out of separate territories for the purpose of favoring a candidate or a party (Bernas, Reviewer in Philippine Constitution, P. 186) 3. Reapportionment within 3 years following return of every census. IV. ELECTION
b. at least (1) year before the next regular election for Members of Congress. The particular House of Congress where vacancy occurs must pass either a resolution if Congress is in session or the Senate President or the Speaker must sign a certification, if Congress is not in session, a. declaring the existence of the vacancy; b. calling for a special election to be held within 45 to 90 days from the date of the resolution or certification. the Senator or representative elected shall serve only for the unexpired term. V. SESSIONS [SEC. 14, ART. VI] 1. Regular convene once every year. The fourth Monday of July until 30 days before the start of new regular session; 2. Special a. called by the President [Sec. 15, Art VII]; b. to call a special election due to a vacancy in the offices of the President and Vice President at 10 oclock a.m. on the third day after the vacancies [Sec. 10, Art. VII]; c. to decide on the disability of the President because the majority of all the members of the cabinet has disputed his assertion that he is able to discharge the powers and duties of his office [Sec.11 par(3), Art. VII]; d. to revoke or extend the Presidential Proclamation of Martial Law or suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. [Sec. 18, Art. VII] 3. Joint sessions a. voting separately (i) choosing the President [Sec. 4, Art. VII]; (ii) determine Presidents disability [Sec. 11, Art. VII];
AND
1. Regular second Monday of May, every three years 2. Special (RA 6645) No special election will be called if vacancy occurs: a. at least eighteen (18) months before the next regular election for members of the Senate;
C HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
30
the political parties and parties and organizations registered under the party-list system represented therein. Senate President as ex-officio chairman. Chairman shall not vote except in case of tie. Powers: 1. Shall act on all appointments submitted to it within 30 session days of Congress from their submission; and 2. Power to promulgate its own rules of proceedings. X. POWERS OF CONGRESS Classification of Powers: 1. Legislative General plenary power (Sec.1, Art.VI); specific power of appropriation, taxation and expropriation; legislative investigations; question hour. 2. Non-Legislative includes power to: a. canvass presidential elections; b. declare existence of a state of war; c. delegation of emergency powers; d. call special election for President and Vice-President; e. give concurrence to treaties and amnesties; f. propose constitutional amendments (constituent power); g. confirm certain appointments; h. impeach; i. decide the disability of the President because majority of the Cabinet disputes his assertion that he is able to discharge his duties; j. revoke or extend proclamation of suspension of privilege of writ of habeas corpus or declaration of martial law (to revoke = legislative veto)
k. power with regard to utilization of natural resources [Sec.2, Art. XII]; Limitations on the Powers of Congress: 1. Substantive a. Express: (i) bill of rights [Art. III]; (ii) on appropriations [Sec. 25 and 29 (1) and (2), Art. VI]; (iii) on taxation [Sec. 28 and 29 (3), Art. VI; Sec 4 (3), Art. XIV]; (iv) on constitutional appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court [Sec. 30, Art. VI]; (v) no law granting title of royalty or nobility shall be passed [Sec. 31, Art. VI]; (vi) no specific funds shall be appropriated or paid for use or benefit of any religion, sect, etc., except for priests, etc., assigned to AFP, penal institutions, etc. [Sec.29(2), Art.VI]. b. Implied: (i) prohibition against irrepealable laws; (ii) non-delegation of powers. 2. Procedural a. only one subject, to be stated in the title of the bill [Sec. 26(1), Art. VI]; and b. 3 readings on separate days; printed copies of the bill in its final form distributed to members 3 days before its passage, except if President certifies to its immediate enactment to meet a public calamity or emergency; upon its last reading, no amendment allowed and the vote thereon taken immediately and the yeas and nays entered into the Journal [Sec. 26(2), Art. VI]; c. appropriation, revenue and tariff bill (RAT Bills) shall originate exclusively from the House of Representatives (Sec. 24, Art. VI)
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
POWER OF APPROPRIATION Appropriations Law a statute, the primary and specific purpose of which, is to authorize release of public funds from treasury. - The existence of appropriations and the availability of funds are indispensable pre-requisites to or conditions sine qua non for the execution of government contracts. (Comelec v. Judge Quijano-Padilla and Photokina Marketing Corp., G.R. No. 151992, September 18, 2002) Implied Limitations on Appropriation Power: 1. must specify public purpose; and 2. sum authorized for release must be determinate, or at least determinable. Constitutional Limitations on Special Appropriations Measures: 1. must specify public purpose for which the sum was intended; and 2. must be supported by funds actually available as certified by National Treasurer or to be raised by corresponding revenue proposal included therein. [Sec. 25(4), Art. VI]. Constitutional Rules on General Appropriations Laws (Sec. 25, Art. VI) 1. Congress may not increase appropriations recommended by the President for operations of Government;
3. As to subject matter
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
32
How a Bill becomes Law: 1. Approved and signed by the President; 2. Presidential veto overridden by 2/3 vote of all members of both Houses;
XI. LEGISLATIVE PROCESS Doctrine of shifting majority: For each House of Congress to pass a bill, only the votes of the majority of those present in the session, there being a quorum, is required. Quorum majority of each House, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day and may compel the attendance of absent Members in such manner and under such penalties as such House may determine [Sec. 16(2), Art. VI]. The basis for determining the existence of a quorum in the Senate shall be the total number of Senators who are in the country and within the coercive jurisdiction of the Senate (Avelino v. Cuenco, 83 Phil 17). Bills that must originate from the House of Representatives: 1. Appropriations bill; 2. Revenue and tariff bills; 3. Bill authorizing increase in public debts; 4. Bill of local application; and 5. Private bills [Sec.24, Art. VI]. Procedure for Approval of Bills: 1. Bill is approved by both chambers; 2. President approves and signs it; 3. If the President vetoes the bill, return bill with presidential objections to the house of origin. Veto may be overridden upon vote of 2/3 of all members of the House of origin and other house; and 4. Presidential inaction for 30 days from receipt of the bill: bill becomes a law as if the same has been signed by him 3. Failure of the President to veto the bill and to return it with his objections to the House where it originated, within 30 days after the date of receipt; 4. A bill calling a special election for President and Vice-President under Sec. 10, Art. VII becomes law upon third and final reading. PRESIDENTIAL VETO General Rule: If the President disapproves a bill enacted by Congress, he should veto the entire bill. He is not allowed to veto separate items of a bill. Exception: Item-veto in the case of appropriation, revenue, and tariff bills [Sec. 27 (2), Art. VI]. Exceptions to the exception: 1. Doctrine of Inappropriate Provisions a provision that is constitutionally inappropriate for an appropriation bill may be singled out for veto even if it is not an appropriation or revenue item (Gonzales v. Macaraig, Jr., 191 SCRA 452). 2. Executive Impoundment - refusal of the President to spend funds already allocated by Congress for specific purpose. It is the failure to spend or obligate budget authority of any type. (Philconsa v. Enriquez, G.R. No. 113105. August 19, 1994). Pocket Veto occurs when (1) the President fails to act on a bill and (2) the reason he does not return the bill to Congress is that Congress is not in session.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Not
applicable in the Philippines because inaction by the President for 30 days never produces a veto even if Congress is in recess. The President must still act to veto the bill and communicate his veto to Congress without need of returning the vetoed bill with his veto message.
Article VII: EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT I. ELECTION 1. Regular second Monday of May, every six years; 2. Special Requisites: a. death, permanent disability, removal from office or resignation of both the President and the Vice President; b. vacancies occur more than eighteen months before the next regular presidential election; c. a law passed by Congress calling for a special election to elect a President and a Vice President to be held not earlier than 45 days nor later than 60 days from the time of such call.[Sec.10, Art.VII]. II. POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT 1. EXECUTIVE POWER power to enforce and administer laws. President shall have control of all executive departments, bureaus and offices. He shall ensure that laws are faithfully executed. (Sec. 17, Art. VII) Until and unless a law is declared unconstitutional, President has a duty to execute it regardless of his doubts as to its validity (faithful execution clause) [Sec.1 and 17 Art. VII] 2. POWER OF APPOINTMENT a. with the consent of the Commission on Appointments
(i) heads of executive departments; (ii) ambassadors and other public ministers and consuls; (iii) officers of the AFP from the rank of colonel or naval captain; and (iv) other ministers whose appointments are vested in him by the Constitution (Sarmiento v. Mison, GR No. 79974, December 17, 1987) b. prior recommendation or nomination by the Judicial and Bar Council; (i) Members of the Supreme Court and all lower courts (Sec.9, Art. VIII); and (ii) Ombudsman and his 5 deputies. c. requiring nominations by multisectoral groups; (i) Regional consultative commission (Sec. 18, Art. X); and (ii) Party-list representatives, before the Party-List Law (Sec.7,Art. XVIII). d. appointment of Vice-President as member of the Cabinet; e. appointment solely by the President. (i) those vested by the Constitution on the President alone; (ii) those whose appointments are not otherwise provided for by law; (iii) those whom he may be authorized by law to appoint; and (iv) those other officers lower in rank who appointment is vested by law in the President alone. Appointing Procedure for those that need CA Confirmation: 1. nomination by the President; 2. confirmation by the Commission on Appointments; 3. issuance of commission; and
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
34
4. acceptance by appointee. Deemed complete upon acceptance (Lacson vs Romero, 84 Phil 740) Limitations on Appointing Power: 1) appointments made by an acting-President shall remain effective unless revoked within 90 days from assumption of office by elected President [Sec. 14, Art. VII]; and 2) President or acting-President shall not make appointments except temporary ones to executive positions 2 months immediately before next Presidential elections and up to the end of his term. Only when continued vacancy will prejudice public service or endanger public safety [Sec. 15, Art. VII]. 3) The spouse and relatives by consanguinity or affinity within the 4th civil degree of the President shall not, during his tenure be appointed as: a. members of the Constitutional Commissions; b. member of the Office of the Ombudsman; c. Secretaries; d. Undersecretaries; e. Chairman or heads of bureaus or offices, including GOCC and their subsidiaries. [Sec.13,par. 2, Art. VII] 4. The President shall have the power to make appointments during the recess of the Congress, whether voluntary or compulsory, but such appointments shall be effective only until disapproval by the CA or until the next adjournment of the Congress. [Sec. 16 par.2, Art. VII] 3. POWER OF REMOVAL General rule: this power is implied from the power to appoint. Exception: those appointed by him where the Constitution prescribes certain methods for separation from public service.(e.g. impeachment)
4. POWER OF CONTROL Control power of an office to: Alter, Modify, Nullify, or Set aside what a substitute had done in the performance of his duties and to substitute his judgment to that of the former (Mondano v. Silvosa, 97 Phil, 143). Doctrine of Qualified Political Agency or Alter Ego Principle acts of the Secretaries of Executive departments when performed and promulgated in the regular course of business or unless disapproved or reprobated by the Chief Executive, are presumptively the acts of the Chief Executive (Villena v. Secretary of the Interior, 67 Phil 451).
5. MILITARY POWERS (SEC. 18, ART. VIII) a. Commander-in Chief clause To call out the Armed Force to prevent or suppress lawless violence, invasion or rebellion; organize courts martial and create military commissions. b. Suspension of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus and Declaration of Martial Law (i.) Grounds: invasion or rebellion, when public safety requires it. (ii.) Duration: not more than 60 days, following which it shall be lifted, unless extended by Congress. (iii.) Duty of the President to report to Congress: within 48 hours personally or in writing. (iv.) Authority of Congress to revoke or extend the effectivity of proclamation: by majority vote of all of its members voting jointly. (v.) Authority of the Supreme Court: to inquire into the sufficiency of the factual
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Reprieve postponement of sentence or stay of execution. Parole release from imprisonment, but without full restoration of liberty, as parolee is in the custody of the law although not in confinement. Amnesty act of grace, concurred in by the Legislature, usually extended to groups of persons who committed political offenses, which puts into oblivion the offense itself.
AMNESTY
1. Political offenses 1.
PARDON
Infraction of peace/ common crimes individuals
2.
Classes persons
of
2.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
36
3.
Requires concurrence of Congress Public act to which court may take judicial notice of Looks backward and puts to oblivion the offense itself
3.
does not require concurrence of Congress Private act which must be pleaded and proved Looks forward and relieves the pardonee of the consequence of the offense. Can be granted only after conviction.
4.
4.
5.
5.
6.
6.
7. BORROWING POWER (SEC. 20, ART. VII) the President may contract or guarantee foreign loans on behalf of the Republic with the concurrence of the Monetary Board, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law. Monetary Board shall submit to Congress report on loans within 30 days from end of every quarter. 8. DIPLOMATIC POWER (SEC. 21, ART. VII) No treaty or international agreement shall be valid and effective unless concurred in by at least 2/3 of all members of Senate. 9. BUDGETARY POWER (SEC. 22, ART. VII) within 30 days from opening of every regular session, President shall submit to Congress a budget of expenditures and sources of financing, including receipts from existing and proposed revenue measures. 10. INFORMING POWER (SEC. 23, ART. VI)
C HAIRPERSONS
12. OTHER POWERS a. call Congress to a special session [Sec. 15, Art. VI]; b. approve or veto bills [Sec. 27, Art. VI]; c. deport aliens (Qua Chee Gan v. The Deportation Board, G.R. No. L-10280. September 30, 1963); d. consent to deputization of government personnel by COMELEC [Sec.2 (4), Art. IX-C]; e. to discipline such deputies [Sec. 2 (8), Art. IX-C]; f. general supervision over local government units and autonomous regional governments (Art. X); general supervision mere overseeing of a subordinate to make sure that they do their duties under the law but does not include the power to overrule their acts, if these acts are within their discretion. g. immunity from suit during his tenure - deemed implied in the Constitution (Bernas, The 1987 Constitution, A Commentary 2003 Ed., p 803) the immunity does not however extend to nonofficial acts or for wrong doing (Estrada vs. Desierto,
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
8. 9. 10. 11.
II. APPOINTMENT TO THE JUDICIARY: Qualifications a. Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court: 1. Natural-born citizen; 2. At least 40 years old; 3. 15 years or more a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines; 4. a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence. b. Presiding Justice and Associate Justices of the Court of Appeals: Same qualifications as those provided for Justice of the Supreme Court; c. Regional Trial Court Judges: 1. Citizen of the Philippines; 2. At least 35 years old; and 3. Has been engaged for at least 5 years in the practice of law in the Philippines or has held public office in the Philippines requiring admission to the practice of
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
38
law as an indispensable requisite. 4. a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence. d. Metropolitan, Municipal and Municipal Circuit Trial Court Judges: 1. Citizen of the Philippines; 2. At least 30 years old; 3. Has been engaged for al least 5 years in the practice of law in the Philippines or has held public office in the Philippines requiring admission to the practice of law as an indispensable requisite; 4. a person of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence. Procedure in Appointment: 1. Appointed by President from among a list of at least 3 nominees prepared by Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy. 2. For lower courts, President shall issue the appointment 90 days from submission of the list. Tenure of Justices and Judges a. Supreme Court hold office until they reach 70 years of age or become incapacitated to discharge their duties [Sec.11, Art.VIII]. May be removed only through impeachment. a. Lower Courts hold office during good behavior until they reach 70 years of age or become incapacitated to discharge their duties [Sec. 11, Art. VIII]. By majority vote of members who actually took part in the deliberation on the issues and voted thereon, SC en banc shall have the power to discipline judges of lower courts or order their dismissal. No law shall be passed reorganizing the Judiciary when
C HAIRPERSONS
it undermines the security of tenure of its members (Sec. 2, Art. VIII). III. JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL Composition: Ex-officio chairman Supreme Court Chief Justice Ex-officio members - Secretary of Justice - Representative of Congress Regular members - Representative of the IBP; - Professor of Law; - Retired member of SC; and - Representative of private sector
Secretary de officio
Clerk of the Supreme Court Appointment Regular members shall be appointed by the President for a 4 year term with the consent of the Commission on Appointments. Powers and Functions of Judicial and Bar Council: 1. Recommend appointees to the judiciary; 2. Recommend appointees to the Office of the Ombudsman and his 5 deputies; 3. May exercise such other functions as may be assigned by Supreme Court. (Sec. 8, Art. VIII) IV. SUPREME COURT Composition: Chief Justice and 14 Associate Justices -may sit en banc or in its discretion, in divisions of 3, 5, or 7 members. - Any vacancy shall be filled within 90 days from occurrence thereof Powers of the Supreme Court 1. Original Jurisdiction
S UBJECT
AND
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
5. Order change of venue or place of trial, to avoid miscarriage of justice. 6. Rule-making power promulgates rules concerning: a. protection and enforcement of constitutional rights; b. pleading, practice and procedures in all courts; c. admissions to the practice of law; d. Integrated Bar of the Philippines; and e. legal assistance to the underprivileged. Limitations on rule making power: (i.) provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for speedy disposition of cases; (ii.) uniform for all courts in the same grade; (iii.) shall not diminish, increase or modify substantive rights. 7. Power of appointment appoints all officials and employees of the Judiciary in accordance with Civil Service Law; 8. Power of administrative supervision administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel thereof. mere division of the SC may discipline a judge of the lower court; the SC is required to decide a case en banc only when the dismissal of a judge is involved. 9. Yearly report Within 30 days from the opening of each regular session of Congress, SC shall submit to the
2. Appellate Jurisdiction Over final judgments and orders of lower courts in a. all cases in which the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question; b. All cases involving the legality of any tax impost, assessment, or toll, or any penalty imposed in relation thereto; c. All cases in which the jurisdiction of any lower court is in issue; d. All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher; e. All cases in which only a question of law is involved. [Section 5 (2), Art. VIII.] 3. Electoral Tribunal for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Contests Sitting En Banc, over all contests relating to the election, returns and qualification of the President or Vice-President (Sec. 4(7) Article VII) The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, defined by Article VII, Section 4, paragraph 7, of the 1987 Constitution, would not include cases directly brought before it, questioning the qualifications of a candidate for the presidency or vice-
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
40
President and Congress an annual report on the operation and activities of the Judiciary. V. POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW Judicial Review the power of the courts to test the validity of executive and legislative acts in light of their conformity with the Constitution. This is not an assertion of superiority by the courts over the other departments, but merely an expression of the supremacy of the Constitution (Angara v. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil. 139)
Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy 1. Although holding neither purse nor sword and so regarded as the weakest of the three departments of the government, the judiciary is nonetheless vested with the power to annul the acts of either the legislative or the executive or of both when not conformable to the fundamental law. (Association of Small Landowners of the Philippines v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343). 2. When the judiciary allocates constitutional boundaries, it neither asserts superiority nor nullifies an act of the Legislature. It only asserts the solemn and sacred obligation assigned to it by the Constitution to determine conflicting claims of authority under the Constitution and to establish for the parties in an actual controversy the rights which that instrument secures and guarantees to them. (Laurel, Angara v. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil 139) Requisites of Judicial Review: 1. Actual case or controversy a conflict of legal rights, an assertion of opposite legal claims susceptible of judicial determination;
2. Constitutional question must be raised by the proper party one who has sustained or is in imminent danger of sustaining an injury as a result of the act complained of; For a taxpayers suit, 2 requisites: a. public funds are disbursed by a political subdivision or instrumentality; and b. a law is violated or some irregularity is committed, and that the petitioner is directly affected by the alleged ultra vires act (Anti-Graft League of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 260 SCRA 250) 3. Constitutional question must be raised at the earliest opportunity General Rule: must be raised in the pleadings Exceptions: a. criminal cases at any time at the discretion of the court; b. civil cases at any stage of the proceedings if necessary for the determination of the case itself; c. every case (except where there is estoppel ) at any stage if it involves the jurisdiction of the court 4. Determination of constitutionality of the statute must be necessary to a final determination of the case. (People vs. Vera, 65 Phil. 56). Therefore, the following must be avoided: political questions; advisory opinions moot and academic issues; no standing. Seven Rules of Avoidance of Constitutional Questions (Brandeis, J.) 1. Friendly, non-adversary proceedings (no vital conflict); 2. Anticipation of a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it (premature case);
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
POLITICAL QUESTION
Two aspects: Those questions which, under the Constitution, are to be decided by the people in their sovereign capacity; or in regard to which full discretionary authority has been delegated to the legislature or executive branches of government. (Taada v. Cuenco, 100 Phil 1101)
Functions of Judicial Review 1. checking invalidating a law or executive act that is found to be contrary to the Constitution; 2. legitimating upholding the validity of the law that results from a mere dismissal of a case challenging the validity of the law; rule on double negative uses the term not unconstitutional; the court cannot declare a law constitutional because it already enjoys a presumption of constitutionality. 3. symbolic to educate the bench and bar as to the controlling principles and concepts on matters of grave public importance for the guidance of and restraint upon the future.(Salonga v. Cruz Pao, 134 SCRA 438)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
42
over the case, despite the lapse of the mandatory period. Erring judge or justice may be subjected to administrative sanctions for the delay. Effect of Declaration Unconstitutionality of
The law is either : 1. void if on its face it does not enjoy any presumption of validity because it is patently offensive to the Constitution. It produces not effect, creates no office and imposes no duty. (Igot v. Comelec, 95 SCRA 392) 2. voidable if on its face it enjoys the presumption of constitutionality. The laws becomes inoperative only upon the judicial declaration of its invalidity; the declaration produces no retroactive effect. (Serrano de Agbayani v. PNB, 38 SCRA 429)
S UBJECT
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
44
3) career executive service e.g., Undersecretaries, Bureau Directors; 4) career officers appointed by President, e.g., foreign service; 5) positions in AFP, governed by separate merit system; 6) personnel of GOCCs with original charter; 7) permanent laborers, whether skilled, semi-skilled or unskilled. b. Non-career Service characterized by :
freedom from misgivings or betrayals on confidential matters of state; Or one declared to be so by President upon recommendations of CSC (Salazar v. Mathay, 73 SCRA 275). Highly Technical requires possession of technical skill or training in supreme or superior degree. (de los Santos v. Mallare, 87 Phil 289) II. COMMISSION ON ELECTION Composition: 1 chairman; 6 commissioners Qualifications: 1. natural-born citizen; 2. at least 35 years old at the time of appointment; 3. college degree holder ; 4. not candidate in election immediately preceding the appointment; and 5. majority, including the chairman, must be members of the Philippine Bar who have been engaged in the practice of law for at least 10 years Term: 7 years without reappointment. If however, the appointment was ad interim, a subsequent renewal of the appointment does not violate the prohibition on reappointments because no previous appointment was confirmed by the Commission on Appointments. Furthermore, the total term of both appointments must not exceed the 7 year limit (Matibag vs. Benapayo G.R. No. 149036, April2, 2002) Powers and Functions of COMELEC: 1. enforce and administer law and regulations relative to conduct of elections, plebiscite, initiative, referendum or recall; 2. exclusive original jurisdiction over all contests relating to election, returns and qualifications of all
AND
1. entrance on bases other than those of usual tests utilized for career service. 2. Tenure limited to period. Kinds: 1) elective officials and their personal and confidential staff; 2) department heads and officials of cabinet rank, and their personal and confidential staff; 3) chairmen and members of commissions and boards with fixed terms of office and their personal and confidential staff; 4) contractual personnel or those whose employment in government is in accordance with special contract for specific work; and 5) emergency and seasonal personnel. Exceptions to requirement competitive examinations determine merit and fitness): of (to
Policy Determining lays down principal or fundamental guidelines or rules. Formulates method of action. Primarily Confidential primarily close intimacy which insures freedom of intercourse without embarrassment of
C HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
46
Jurisdiction of the Commission: no law shall be passed exempting any entity of the Government, or any investment of public funds, from the jurisdiction of the Commission on Audit (Sec. 3, Art. IX-D) Article XI: ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS I. 1. 2. 3. 4. IMPEACHABLE OFFICERS: President; Vice-President; Justices of the Supreme Court; Chairmen and Members of the Constitutional Commissions; 5. Ombudsman. II. IMPEACHMENT PROCESS Grounds for Impeachment: 1. Culpable violation Constitution; 2. Treason; 3. Bribery; 4. Graft and Corruption; 5. Other high crimes; and 6. Betrayal of public trust. of the
together with the corresponding resolution. 5. Placing on calendar the Committee resolution within 10 days from submission; 6. Discussion on the floor of the report; 7. A vote of at least one third of all the members of the House shall be necessary either to affirm a favorable resolution with the Articles of Impeachment of the Committee or override its contrary resolution. Trial and Decision in Impeachment proceedings 1. The Senators take an oath or affirmation. 2. When the President of the Philippines is on trial the Chief Justice of the Supreme court shall preside but shall not vote. 3. A decision of conviction must be concurred in by at least two thirds of all the members of the Senate.
Initiation of Impeachment Case The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment Process of Impeachment 1. Verified Complaint filed by any member of the house or any citizen upon resolution of endorsement by any member thereof 2. Included in the order of business within 10 session days. 3. Referred to the proper committee within 3 session days of its inclusion. If the verified complaint is filed by at least one third of all its members, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. 4. The Committee, after hearing, and by majority vote of all its members, shall submit its report to the House
Effect of Conviction: 1. Removal from Office; 2. Disqualification to hold any other office under the Republic of the Philippines; 3. Party convicted shall be liable and subject to prosecution, trial and punishment according to law. Limitations: 1. The House of Representatives shall have the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment. 2. Not more than one impeachment proceeding shall be initiated against the same official within a period of one year - An impeachment case is the legal controversy that must be decided by the Senate while an impeachment proceeding is one that is initiated in the House of Representatives. For purposes of applying the-one year bar rule, the proceeding is initiated or begins when a verified complaint is filed and referred to the Committee on
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
48
with E.O. nos. 1, 2, 14 and 14-A issued in 1986. 2. Exclusive Original Jurisdiction over petitions for the issuance of the writs of mandamus, prohibitions, certiorari, habeas corpus, injunction and other ancillary writs and processes in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, Provided, that jurisdiction over these petitions shall be not exclusive of the Supreme Court; and 3. Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction over final judgments, resolutions or orders of regional trial courts whether in the exercise of their own original jurisdiction or of their appellate jurisdiction. (RA 8249) V. THE OMBUDSMAN The champion of the citizens and protector of the people Tasked to entertain complaints addressed to him against erring public officers and take all necessary actions thereon.
Disqualifications and Inhibitions: During their tenure: 1. shall not hold any other office or employment; 2. shall not engage in the practice of any profession or in the active management or control of any business which in any way may be affected by the functions of his office; 3. shall not be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with, or in any franchise or privilege granted by the government, or any of its subdivisions, etc.; 4. shall not be qualified to run for any office in the election immediately succeeding their cessation from office. Powers, Functions and Duties: a. Investigate any act or omission of any public official, employee, office or agency, when such act or omission appears to be illegal, unjust, improper, or inefficient; b. Direct any public official or employee of the Government, or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof, as well as any GOCC with original charter, to perform or expedite any act or duty required by law, or to stop, prevent, and correct any abuse or impropriety in the performance of duties. c. Direct the officer concerned to take appropriate action against a public official or employee at fault, and recommend his removal, suspension, demotion, fine, censure, or prosecution, and ensure compliance therewith. d. Direct the officer concerned, in any appropriate case, and subject to such limitation as may be provided by law, to furnish it with copies of documents relating to contracts or transactions entered into by his office involving the disbursement or use of public funds or properties, and report any irregularity to the COA for appropriate action. e. Request any government agency for assistance and information necessary in the discharge of its responsibilities
AND
Composition: An Ombudsman to be known as Tanodbayan 1 overall Deputy; and at least 1 Deputy each for Luzon, Vizayas and Mindanao; A separate Deputy for the military establishment may likewise be appointed. Qualifications of the Ombudsman and his deputies: 1. natural born citizen; 2. at least 40 years old; 3. of recognized probity and independence; 4. member of the Philippine Bar; and 5. must not have been candidates for any elective office in the immediately preceding election. Term of Office: 7 years without reappointment.
C HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
50
the state. With the exception of agricultural lands, all other natural resources shall not be alienated. (Sec. 2, Art. XII). Classification of Lands of the Public Domain (Sec. 3, Art. XII) 1. agricultural 2. forest timber; 3. mineral lands; and 4. national parks. Requirement of Reclassification or Conversion: positive act of government; mere issuance of title not enough (Sunbeam Convenience Food v. Court of Appeals, 181 SCRA 443). III. FILIPINIZED ACTIVITIES REGARDING THE NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY: 1. co-production, joint venture or production sharing agreement for exploration, development and utilization (EDU) of natural resources: Filipino citizens or entities (read: corporations or associations) with 60% Filipino capitalization; Exception: For large-scale EDU of minerals, petroleum and other mineral oils, the President may enter into agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving technical or financial assistance. - These agreements refer to service contracts which involve foreign management and operation provided that the Government shall retain that degree of control sufficient to direct and regulate the affairs of individual enterprises and restrain undesired activities (La Bugal-Blaan Tribal Assoc., et al. vs. Secretary, DENR, et al., G.R. No. 127882, December 1, 2004) 2. use and enjoyment of nations marine wealth within territory: Exclusively for Filipino citizens; 3. Alienable lands of the public domain: Only Filipino citizens may acquire not more than 12 hectares by purchase, homestead or grant, or
C HAIRPERSONS
lease not more than 500 hectares. Private corporations may lease not more than 1,000 hectares for 25 years renewable for another 25 years; 4. Certain areas of investment: reserved for Filipino citizens or entities with 60 % FC, although Congress may provide for higher percentage; 5. grant of rights, privileges and concessions covering national economy and patrimony, State shall give preference to qualified Filipinos; and 6. Franchise, certificate or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility: only to Filipino citizens or entities with 60% FC; such franchise, etc., shall not be exclusive, nor for period longer than 50 years and subject to amendment, alteration or repeal by Congress; all executive and managing officers must be Filipino citizens.
IV. PRIVATE LANDS General Rule: no private land shall be transferred or conveyed except to individual, corporations or associations qualified to acquire or hold lands of the public domain. Exceptions: 1. foreigners who inherit through intestate succession; 2. former natural-born Filipino citizen may be a transferee of private lands subject to limitations provided by law. 3. ownership in condominium units. 4. Parity right agreement, under the 1935 Constitution Stewardship Doctrine Private property is supposed to be held by the individual only as a trustee for the people in general, who are its real owners.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
likewise, claim just compensation for the use of the said business and its properties as the temporary takeover by the government is in exercise of its police power and not of its power of eminent domain. (Agan vs. PIATCO, G.R. No. 155001, May 5, 2003)
Article XIII : SOCIAL JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS Social Justice as Envisioned by the Constitution equitable diffusion of wealth and political power for common good; regulation of acquisition, ownership, use and disposition of property and its increments; and creation of economic opportunities based on freedom of initiative and self-reliance (Sec. 1 and 2, Art. XIII). Distributive Justice the attainment of a more equitable distribution of land
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
52
Freedom to determine for itself on academic grounds: a. who may teach; b. what may be taught; c. how shall it be taught; and d. who may be admitted to study (Miriam College Foundation v. CA, GR No. 127930, December 15, 2000); - As part of its constitutionally enshrined academic freedom, the University of the Philippines has the prerogative to determine who may teach its students. The Civil Service Commission has no authority to force it to dismiss a member of its faculty even in the guise of enforcing Civil Service Rules.(UP v. Civil Service Commission, GR No.132860, April 3, 2001) 2. to the faculty a. freedom in research and in the publication of the results, subject to the adequate performance of his other academic duties; b. freedom in the classroom in discussing his subject, less controversial matters which bear no relation to the subject; c. freedom from institutional censorship or discipline, limited by his special position in the community. 3. to the student - right to enjoy in school the guarantee of the Bill of rights (Non v. Dames, 185 SCRA 523). Article XVI : STATE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT Basis: The state may not be sued without its consent. (Sec. 3, Art. XVI). Test to determine if suit is against State: If the enforcement of the decision rendered against the public officer or agency impleaded will require an affirmative act from State,
C HAIRPERSONS
then, it is a suit against the State (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 20). A suit is against the state, regardless of who is named as defendant, if it produces adverse consequences on the public treasury, whether in the disbursement of funds or loss of property, the public official proceeded against not being liable in his personal capacity. (Begosa v. Chairman, Phil. Veterans Adm. 32 SCRA 466)
Forms of Consent: 1. Express consent a. general law (i.) Act No. 3083 and CA 327 as amended by Secs. 49-50, PD 1445: money claims arising from contracts first filed with COA before suit may be filed in court; (ii.) Art. 2180, NCC: tort committed by special agent; (iii.) Art. 2189, NCC: LGUs liable for injuries or death caused by defective condition of roads xxx or public works under their control (City of Manila vs Teotico, 22 SCRA 267) (iv.) Sec. 22 (2) of RA 7160 (LGC of 1991): LGUs have power to sue and be sued; (v.) Sec. 24 of LGC, LGUs and their officials are not exempt from liability for death or injury or damage to property. b. special law (Merritt v. Government of the Philippine Islands, 34 Phil., 311). 2. implied consent a. when State commences litigation becomes vulnerable to counterclaim; (Froilan v. Pan Oriental Shipping, GR No. L-6060 Sept. 30, 1950) b. State enters into a business contract
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
54
1. Proposal i. Congress acting as Constituent Assembly (i.) Direct proposal vote of of all its members (ii.) by calling a Constitutional Convention called either by: (iia.) 2/3 vote of all the members of the Congress; or (iib.) a majority vote of all the members of Congress, with the question of whether or not to call a constitutional convention to be resolved by the people in a plebiscite (Sec. 3, Art. XVII)
purpose; Indirect Initiative the exercise of initiative by the people through a proposition sent to Congress or the local legislative body for action (Sec 2, RA6735).
If Congress, acting as a
Constituent Assembly, omits to provide for the implementing details, Congress, acting as a Legislative Assembly this time, can enact the necessary implementing legislation to fill in the gaps.(Imbong v. Ferrer, G.R. No. L-32432. September 11, 1970). b. by the people through Initiative by a petition of at least 12% of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least 3% of the registered voters therein. Initiative the power of the people to propose amendments to the Constitution or to propose and enact legislation through an election called for the
C HAIRPERSONS
PROPOSAL BY CONGRESS
For both Amendments and Revisions
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
REVISION
Reexamination of the entire Constitution or an important cluster of provisions in the Constitution
2. Ratification - Proposed amendment(s) shall be submitted to the people and shall be deemed ratified by majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite, held not earlier than 60 days nor later than 90 days: a. after approval of the proposal by Congress or ConCon, or; b. after certification by the COMELEC of sufficiency of petition of the people. Doctrine of Proper Submission plebiscite may be held on the same day as regular election.(Gonzales v. Comelec, 21 SCRA 774) provided the people are sufficiently informed of the amendments to be voted upon, to conscientiously deliberate thereon, to express their will in a genuine manner.
Submission
of piece-meal amendments is unconstitutional. All the amendments must be submitted for ratification at one plebiscite only. The people have to be given a proper frame of reference in arriving at their decision. They have no idea yet of what the rest of the amended constitution would be. (Tolentino v. Comelec, G.R. No. L-34150. October 16, 1971). Questions as to amendments are now subject to Judicial review. (Sanidad v. Comelec, 78 SCRA 332)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
56
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Branch of public law that fixes the organization of the government and determines competence of authorities who execute the law and indicates to the individual remedies for the violations of his rights. I. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES BODIES OR MAKING POWER In exercise of delegated legislative power, involving no discretion as to what law shall be, but merely authority to fix details in execution or enforcement of a policy set out in law itself. Kinds: 1. Legislative regulation a. Supplementary or detailed legislation, e.g. Rules and Regulations Implementing the Labor Code; b. Contingent regulation 2. Interpretative legislation, e.g. BIR Circulars Requisites for valid exercise: 1. Issued under authority of law; 2. Within the scope and purview of the law; 3. Promulgated in accordance with the prescribed procedure: a. notice and hearing generally, not required; only when: i. the legislature itself requires it and mandates that the regulation shall be based on certain facts as determined at an appropriate investigation;
AND
- A body, other than the courts and the legislature, endowed with quasilegislative and quasi-judicial powers for the purpose of enabling it to carry out laws entrusted to it for enforcement or execution. How Created: 1. by constitutional provision; 2. by legislative enactment; and 3. by authority of law. II. POWERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES: 1. Quasi-legislative or rule-making power; 2. Quasi-judicial or adjudicatory power; and 3. Determinative powers. A. QUASI-LEGISLATIVE OR RULEC HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
ii.
applicability
specific situation 3. present determination of rights, privileges or duties as of previous or present time or occurrence
3. prospective; it envisages the promulgation of a rule or regulation generally applicable in the future
B. QUASI-JUDICIAL OR ADJUDICATORY POWER Proceedings partake of nature of judicial proceedings. Administrative body granted authority to promulgate its own rules of procedure. Two necessary conditions: 1. due process; and 2. jurisdiction Includes the following powers: 1. Prescribe rules of procedure 2. Subpoena power 3. Contempt Power Administrative Due Process: 1. right to a hearing; 2. tribunal must consider evidence presented; 3. decision must have something to support itself; 4. evidence must be substantial; 5. decision must be based on evidence adduced at hearing or at least contained in the record and disclosed to parties; 6. board of judges must act on its independent consideration of facts and law of the case, and not simply accept view of subordinate in arriving at a decision; and 7. decision must be rendered in such a manner that parties to controversy can know various issues involved and reason for decision rendered.(Ang Tibay vs CIR, 69 Phil 635) Substantial Evidence relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.
QUASIJUDICIAL FUNCTIONS
refers to its end product called order, reward or decision
2.
general
2. applies to a
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
58
Administrative Determinations Where Notice and Hearing Not Necessary: 1. summary proceedings of distraint and levy upon property of delinquent taxpayer; 2. grant of provisional authority for increase of rates, or to engage in particular line of business; 3. cancellation of passport where no abuse of discretion is committed; 4. summary abatement of nuisance per se which affects safety of persons or property; 5. preventive suspension of officer or employee pending investigation; and 6. grant or revocation of licenses for permits to operate certain businesses affecting public order or morals. Administrative Appeal or Review 1. Where provided by law, appeal from administrative determination may be made to higher or superior administrative officer or body. 2. By virtue of power of control of President, President himself or through Department Head may affirm, modify, alter, or reverse administrative decision of subordinate. 3. Appellate administrative agency may conduct additional hearing in appealed case, if deemed necessary. Res judicata effect of Administritve Decisions - has the force and binding effect of a final judgment (note: applies only to judicial and quasi judicial proceedings not to exercise of administrative functions, Brillantes vs. Castro 99 Phil. 497) C. DETERMINATIVE POWERS 1. enabling permit the doing of an act which the law undertakes to regulate; 2. directing order the doing or performance of particular acts to ensure compliance with the law and are often exercised for corrective purposes
3. dispensing to relax the general operation of a law or to exempt from general prohibition, or relieve an individual or a corporation from an affirmative duty; 4. examining - also called investigatory power; 5. summary power to apply compulsion or force against persons or property to effectuate a legal purpose without judicial warrants to authorize such actions. III. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Whenever there is an available administrative remedy provided by law, no judicial recourse can be made until all such remedies have been availed of and exhausted. 1. Doctrine of Prior Resort or (Doctrine of Primary Administrative Jurisdiction) where there is competence or jurisdiction vested upon administrative body to act upon a matter, no resort to courts may be made before such administrative body shall have acted upon the matter. 2. Doctrine of Finality of Administrative Action no resort to courts will be allowed unless administrative action has been completed and there is nothing left to be done in administrative structure. 3. Judicial Relief from Threatened Administrative Action courts will not render a decree in advance of administrative action and thereby render such action nugatory. It is not for the court to stop an administrative officer from performing his statutory duty for fear he will perform it wrongly. Effect of Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: as a general rule, jurisdiction of the court is not affected but the complaint is vulnerable to dismissal due to lack of cause of action. Exceptions to the Doctrine:
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
60
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
62
requirement or condition (e.g., taking an oath or giving a bond); 3. Under color of a known election or appointment, void because: a. the officer was not eligible; b. there was a want of power in the electing or appointing body; c. there was a defect or irregularity in its exercise; such ineligibility, want of power, or defect being unknown to the public. 4. Under color of an election or an appointment by or pursuant to a public, unconstitutional law, before the same is adjudged to be such. Note: Here, what is unconstitutional is not the act creating the office, but the act by which the officer is appointed to an office legally existing. (Norton v. County of Shelby) Requisites: 1. valid existing office; 2. actual physical possession of said office; 3. color of title to office; 4. by reputation or acquiescence; 5. known or valid appointment or election but officer failed to conform with legal requirements; 6. known appointment or election but void because of ineligibility of officer or want of authority of appointing or electing authority or irregularity in appointment or election not known to public; and 7. known appointment or election pursuant to unconstitutional law before declaration of unconstitutionality. DE JURE OFFICER
1. 2. rests right on the 1. 2. 3. cannot be removed in a direct proceeding 3.
color of right without being technically qualified in all points of law to act may be ousted in a direct proceeding against him.
DE FACTO OFFICER
1. officer under any of the 4 circumstances mentioned 1.
INTRUDER
one who takes possession of an office and undertakes to act officially without any authority, either actual or apparent has neither lawful title nor color of right or title to office acts are absolutely void and can be impeached in any proceeding at any time unless and until he continues to act for so long a time as to afford a presumption of his right to act not entitled to compensation
2.
2.
3.
acts are valid as to the public until such time as his title to the office is adjudged insufficient
3.
4.
4.
DE FACTO OFFICER
on reputation has possession and performs the duties under
Legal Effects of Acts - valid insofar as they affect the public Entitlement to Salaries General Rule: rightful incumbent may recover from de facto officer salary received by latter during time of
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Appointment selection, by authority vested with power, of individual who is to perform functions of a given office. Essentially a discretionary power and must be performed by the officer in which it is vested according to his best lights, the only condition being that the appointee should possess the minimum qualification requirements prescribed by law for the position (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 305) Commission written evidence of appointment. Designation imposition of additional duties, usually by law, on a person already in public office. Classification of Appointments: 1. Permanent extended to person possessing requisite qualification for the position and thus enjoys security of tenure; 2. Temporary acting appointment, given to a non-civil service eligible is without a definite tenure and is dependent upon the pleasure of the appointing power; 3. Provisional- is one which may be issued upon prior authorization of the Commissioner of Civil service in accordance with the provisions
Ad interim appointment
Made during the recess Made before such confirmation
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
64
Nepotism all appointments in the national, provincial, city and municipal governments or in any branch or instrumentality thereof, including GOCC, made in favor of a relative of the (1) appointing or (2) recommending authority or of the (3) chief of the bureau or office or of the (4) persons exercising immediate supervision over him. A relative is one within the 3rd degree either of consanguinity or affinity Vacancy when an office is empty and without a legally qualified incumbent appointed or elected to it with a lawful right to exercise its powers and performs its duties. Classifications of vacancy: 1. original when an office is created and no one has been appointed to fill it; 2. constructive when the incumbent has no legal right or claim to continue in office and can be legally replaced by another functionary; 3. accidental when the incumbent having died, resigned, or been removed; 4. absolute when the term of an incumbent having expired and the latter not having held over, no successor is in being who is legally qualified to assume the office. V. POWERS AND DUTIES OF A PUBLIC OFFICER: 1. Ministerial discharge is imperative and requires neither judgment nor discretion, mandamus will lie; and 2. Discretionary imposed by law wherein officer has right to decide how and when duty shall be performed, mandamus will not lie. VII. LIABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICER
Exceptions: 1. statutory liability under the Civil Code (Arts. 27, 32 and 34); 2. When there is a clear showing of bad faith, malice or negligence (Administrative Code of 1987); 3. liability on contracts; and 4. liability on tort . Threefold Liability Rule wrongful acts or omissions of public officers may give rise to civil, criminal, and administrative liability. (CAC liability rule) Liability of Ministerial Officers: 1. Nonfeasance neglect or refusal to perform an act which is officers legal obligation to perform; 2. Misfeasance failure to use that degree of care, skill and diligence required in the performance of official duty; and 3. Malfeasance doing, through ignorance, inattention or malice, of an act which he had no legal right to perform. Doctrine of Command Responsibility A superior officer is liable for acts of a subordinate when: (ERCAL) 1. he negligently or willfully employs or retains unfit or incompetent subordinates; 2. he negligently or willfully fails to require subordinate to conform to prescribed regulations; 3. he negligently or carelessly oversees business of office as to furnish subordinate an opportunity for default; 4. he directed or authorized or cooperated in the wrong; or 5. law expressly makes him liable.
General Rule: not liable for injuries sustained by another as a consequence of official acts done within the scope of his authority, except as otherwise provided by law.
C HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
a. by whom the proper disciplining authority may preventively suspend; b. against whom any subordinate officer or employee under such authority; c. when pending an investigation; d. grounds if the charge against such officer or employee involves: i. dishonesty; ii. oppression or grave misconduct; iii. neglect in the performance of duty; or iv. if there are reasons to believe that respondent is guilty of the charges which would warrant his removal from the service e. duration the administrative investigation must be terminated within 90 days; otherwise, the respondent shall be automatically reinstated unless the delay in the disposition of the case is due to the fault, negligence or petition of the respondent, in which case the period of delay shall not be counted in computing the period of suspension. A Presidential Appointee: a. can only be investigated and removed from office after due notice and hearing by the President of the Philippines under the principle that the power to remove is inherent in the power to appoint as can be implied from Sec. 5, R.A.2260 (Villaluz v. Zaldivar, 15 SCRA 710). b. the Presidential Commission Against Graft and Corruption (PCAGC) shall have the power to investigate administrative complaints against presidential appointees in the executive department of the government, including GOCCs charged with graft and corruption involving one or a combination of the following criteria:
2. no compensation
due for the period of suspension even if found innocent of the charges.
2. If exonerated,
Rules on Preventive Suspension: 1. Appointive Officials Not a Presidential Appointee (Secs. 4142, P.D. 807):
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
66
presidential appointees with the rank equivalent to or higher than an Assistant Regional Director; ii. amount involved is at least P10M; iii. those which threaten grievous harm or injury to the national interest; and iv. those which may be assigned to it by the President (E.O. No. 151 and 151-A). 2. Elective Officials: (Sec 63, R.A. 7160) a. by whom against whom i. President elective official of a province, a highly urbanized or an independent component city; ii. Governor elective official of a component city or municipality; iii. Mayor elective official of a barangay b. when at any time after the issues are joined; c. grounds: i. reasonable ground to believe that the respondent has committed the act or acts complained of; ii. evidence of culpability is strong; iii. gravity of the offense so warrants; iv. continuance in office of the respondent could influence the witnesses or pose a threat to the safety and integrity of the records and other evidence d. duration: i. single administrative case not to extend beyond 60 days; ii. several administrative cases not more than 90 days within a single year on the same ground or grounds existing and known at the time of the first suspension - Section 24 of the Ombudsman Act (R.A. 6770) expressly provide that the preventive suspension shall continue until the case is
C HAIRPERSONS
i.
1. 2. 3.
terminated by the Office of the Ombudsman but not more than 6 months without pay. The preventive suspension for 6 months without pay is thus according to law (Lastimosa v. Vasquez, 243 SCRA 497) R.A. 3019 makes it mandatory for the Sandiganbayan to suspend, for a maximum period of 90 days unless the case is decided within a shorter period, any public officer against whom a valid information is filed charging violation of: R.A. 3019; Book II, Title 7, Revised Penal Code; or offense involving fraud upon government or public funds or property (Cruz, The Law of Public Officers, pp. 86-87)
VII. RIGHTS OF PUBLIC OFFICERS: 1. Right to Office just and legal claim to exercise powers and responsibilities of the public office. Term period during which officer may claim to hold office as a right. Tenure period during which officer actually holds office. 2. Right to Salary Basis: legal title to office and the fact the law attaches compensation to the office. Salary compensation provided to be paid to public officer for his services. Preventive Suspension public officer not entitled during the period of preventive suspension, but upon exoneration and reinstatement he must be paid full salaries and emoluments during such period. Back salaries are also payable to an officer illegally dismissed or otherwise unjustly deprived of his office the right to recover accruing from the date of
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
68
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
expiration of term or tenure; reaching the age limit; resignation; recall; removal; abandonment; acceptance of incompatible office; abolition of office; prescription of right to office (within one year after the cause of ouster or the right to hold such office or position arose); impeachment; death; failure to assume elective office within 6 months from proclamation; conviction of a crime; and filing of certificate of candidacy. pleasure of appointing power, his replacement amounts to expiration of his term, not removal.(Alajar vs Alba, 100 Phil 683)
a. President and Vice-President Congress b. Members of Congress respective Chambers e. Governors, Vice Governors, Mayors and Vice Mayors of HUCs and independent component cities - President. f. Municipal Mayors and Vice Mayors/City Mayors and Vice Mayors of component cities Provincial Governor; g. Sanggunian Members Sanggunian concerned; and h. Elective Barangay Officials Municipal or City Mayors Recall - termination of official relationship for loss of confidence prior to expiration of his term through the will of the people. Limitations on Recall: 1. any elective official may be subject of a recall election only once during his term of office for loss of confidence; and 2. no recall shall take place within one year from date of the officials assumption to office or one year immediately preceding a regular local election. Procedure for Recall (Secs. 70-72, R.A. 7160) 1. Initiation of the Recall Process: a. by a Preparatory Recall Assembly (PRA) composed of: i. Provincial mayors, vice mayors and sanggunian (sg) members of the municipalities and component cities; ii. City punong barangay and (sg) barangay members; iii. Legislative District: iiia. SG Panlalawigan municipal officials in the district; iiib. SG Panglunsod barangay officials in the district; iv. Municipal - punong barangay and (sg) barangay members;
AND
Principle of Hold-Over if no express or implied Constitutional or statutory provision to the contrary, public officer is entitled to hold office until successor has been chosen and shall have qualified. Purpose: to prevent hiatus in public office. (But subject to Art. 237 of RPC) Retirement: Members of Judiciary : 70 years of age Other government officers and employees : 65 years of age Optional retirement age: after rendition of minimum number of years of service. Accepting Authority for Resignation: 1. to competent authority provided by law; 2. If law is silent and public officer is appointed, tender to appointing officer; 3. If law is silent and public officer is elected, tender to officer authorized by law to call election to fill vacancy:
C HAIRPERSONS
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
majority
3. Election on Recall COMELEC shall set the date of the election on recall: a. for barangay, city or municipal officials not later than 30 days after the filing of the resolution or petition; b. for provincial officials - not later than 45 days after the filing of the resolution or petition; 4. Effectivity of Recall only upon the election and proclamation of a successor in the person of the candidate receiving the highest number of votes cast during the election on recall. Should the official sought to be recalled receive the highest number of votes, confidence in him is thereby affirmed, and he shall continue in office.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
70
ELECTION LAW
I.SUFFRAGE - right to vote in election of officers chosen by people and in the determination of questions submitted to people. It includes: 1. election; 2. plebiscite; 3. initiative; and 4. referendum. Election means by which people choose their officials for a definite and fixed period and to whom they entrust for time being the exercise of powers of government. Kinds: 1. Regular election one provided by law for election of officers either nationwide or in certain subdivisions thereof, after expiration of full term of former members; and 2. Special election one held to fill vacancy in office before expiration of full term for which incumbent was elected. Failure of Elections there are only 3 instances where a failure of elections may be declared, namely: a. The election in any polling place has not been held on the date fixed on account of force majeure, violence, terrorism, fraud, or other analogous causes; b. The election in any polling place had been suspended before the hour fixed by law for the closing of the voting on account of force majeure, violence, terrorism, fraud, or other analogous causes; and c. After the voting and during the preparation and transmission of the election returns or in the custody or canvass thereof such
C HAIRPERSONS
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
election results in a failure to elect on account of force majeure, violence, terrorism, fraud or other analogous causes. (Joseph Peter Sison v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 134096, March 3, 1999) What is common in these three instances is the resulting failure to elect. In the first instance, no election is held while in the second, the election is suspended. In the third instance, circumstances attending the preparation, transmission, custody or canvass of the election returns cause a failure to elect. The term failure to elect means nobody emerged as a winner. (Pasandalan vs. Comelec, G.R. No. 150312, July 18, 2002) The causes for the declaration of a failure of election may occur before or after the casting of votes or on the day of the election. (Sec. 4, R.A. 7166) The COMELEC shall call for the holding or continuation of the election on a date reasonably close to the date of the election not held, suspended, or which resulted in a failure to elect but not later than 30 days after the cessation of the cause of such suspension or failure to elect. (Sec. 6, B.P. 881) In such election, the location of polling places shall be the same as that of the preceding regular election. However, changes may be initiated by written petition
AND
S UBJECT
Qualification for Suffrage: 1. Filipino citizen; 2. At least 18 years of age; 3. Resident of the Philippines for at least one year; 4. Resident of place where he proposes to vote for at least 6 months; and 5. Not otherwise disqualified by law. Disqualification: 1. person convicted by final judgment to suffer imprisonment for not less than 1 year, unless pardoned or granted amnesty; but right reacquired upon expiration of 5 years after service of sentence; 2. person adjudged by final judgment of having committed any crime involving disloyalty to government or any crime against national security; but right is reacquired upon
Groups Disqualified for Registration: 1. religious denominations or sects; 2. those who seek to achieve their goals through violence or unlawful means; 3. those who refuse to uphold and adhere to Constitution; and 4. those supported by foreign governments. Grounds for Cancellation of Registration: 1. accepting financial contributions from foreign governments or their agencies; and
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
72
2. failure to obtain at least 10% of votes casts in constituency where party fielded candidates.
Party System a free and open party system shall be allowed to evolve according to free choice of people. no votes cast in favor of political party, organization or coalition shall be valid except for those registered under the party-list system provided in the Constitution; political parties registered under party-list system shall be entitled to appoint poll watchers in accordance with law; and part-list representatives shall constitute 20% of total number of representatives in the House. Guidelines for screening party-list participants 1. The political party, sector, organization or coalition must represent the marginalized and underrepresented groups identified in Sec. 5 of RA 7941. Majority of its member-ship should belong to the marginalized and underrepresented; 2. While even major political parties are expressly allowed by RA 7941 and the Constitution, they must comply with the declared statutory policy of Filipino citizens belonging to marginalized and underrepresented sectors to be elected to the House of Representatives. Thus, they must show that they represent the interest of the marginalized and underrepresented. 3. That religious sector may not be represented in the party-list system; except that priests, imam or pastors may be elected should they represent not their religious sect but the indigenous community sector; 4. A party or an organization must not be disqualified under Sec. 6, RA 7941 as follows: a. it is a religious sect or denomination, organization or
C HAIRPERSONS
association organized for religious purposes; b. it advocates violence or unlawful means to seek its goals; c. it is a foreign party or organization; d. it is receiving support from any foreign government, foreign political party, foundation, organization, whether directly or through any of its officers or members or indirectly through third parties for partisan election purposes; e. it violates or fails to comply with laws, rules or regulation relating to elections; f. it declares untruthful statements in its petition; g. it has ceased to exist for at least one (1) year; or h. it fails to participate in the last two (2) preceding elections or fails to obtain at least two per centum (2%) of the votes cast under the party-list system in two (2) preceding elections for the constituency in which it has registered. 5. the party or organization must not be an adjunct of, or a project organized or an entity funded or assisted by, the government. 6. the party, including its nominees must comply with the qualification requirements of section 9, RA 7941 as follows: No person shall be nominated as party-list representative unless he is: (a) natural-born citizen of the Philippines; (b) a registered voter; (c) a resident of the Philippines for a period of not less than one year immediately preceding the day of the election; (d) able to read and write; (e) a bona fide member of the party or organization which he seeks to represent for at least 90 days preceding the day of the election; and (f) at least 25 years of age on the day of the election. In case of a nominee of the youth sector, he must at least be twenty five (25) but not more than thirty (30) years of age on the day of the election. Any
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
LOCAL POSITIONS
60 minutes for TV 90 minutes for Radio
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
74
Prohibited Campaign 1. Public exhibition of movie, cinematograph or documentary portraying the life or biography of a candidate during campaign period; 2. Public exhibition of a movie, cinematograph or documentary portrayed by an actor or media personality who is himself a candidate; 3. Use of airtime for campaign of a media practitioner who is an official of a party or a member of the campaign staff of a candidate or political party; Limitation on Expenses: 1. for candidates: President and Vice President = P10/voter; Other candidates, if with party = P3/voter; Other candidates, if without party = P5/voter. 2. for political parties = P5/voter Statement of Contribution and Expenses every candidate and treasurer of political party shall, within 30 days after day of election, file offices of COMELEC the full, true and itemized statement of all contribution and expenditures in connection with election. Election Survey The SC held that Sec. 5.4 of the Fair Election Act prohibiting publication of survey results 15 days immediately preceding a national election and 7 days before a local election violates the constitutional rights of speech, expression, and the press because: it imposes a prior restraint on the freedom of expression; It is a direct and total suppression of a category of expression even though such suppression is only for a limited period; and
the governmental interest sought to be promoted can be achieved by means other than the suppression of freedom of expression. (Social Weather Station v. Comelec, G.R. No. 147571 May 5, 2001)
Substituted and Substitute Candidate - In case of valid substitutions after the officials ballots have been printed, the votes cast for the substituted candidates shall be considered as stray votes but shall not invalidate the whole ballot. For this purpose, the official ballots shall provide for spaces where the voters may write the name of the substitute candidates if they are voting for the latter: Provided, however, That if the substitute candidate is of the same family name, this provision shall not apply.(Sec.12) V. PRE-PROCLAMATION CONTROVERSY Any question pertaining to or affecting proceedings of Board of Canvassers which may be raised by any candidate or by a registered political party or coalition of political parties before the board or directly with COMELEC or any matter raised under Sections 233, 234, 235, and 236, in relation to preparation, transmission, receipt, custody and appreciation of election returns. Issues which may be raised in a PreProclamation Controversy: 1. Illegal composition or proceedings of the board of Canvassers; 2. Canvassed election returns are incomplete, contain material defects, appears to be tampered with or falsified; or contain discrepancies in the same returns or in other authentic copies thereof as mentioned in Sec. 233,234,235 and 236 of BP 881; 3. Election returns were prepared under duress, threat, coercion, or intimidation, or they are obviously manufactured or not authentic; and
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
VIII.
ELECTION CONTESTS
Nature: special summary proceeding object of which is to expedite settlement of controversies between candidates as to who received majority of legal votes. Purpose: to ascertain true will of people and duly elected officer, and this could be achieved by throwing wide open the appeal before the court. Contest: any matter involving title or claim of title to an elective office, made before or after proclamation of winner, whether or not contestant is claiming office in dispute. Election, Returns and qualification refers to all matters affecting validity of the contestees title to the position. Election conduct of the polls, including the registration of voters, holding of election campaign, and casting and counting of votes. Returns include the canvass of returns and proclamation of winners, together with questions concerning composition of Board of Canvassers and authenticity of election returns. Qualifications matter which could be raised in a quo warranto proceedings against the proclaimed winner, such as his disloyalty to the Republic or his ineligibility or inadequacy of his certificate of candidacy. Original Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Election Contests 1. President and Vice-President Supreme Court en banc 2. Senator - Senate Electoral Tribunal 3. Representative - HR Electoral Tribunal
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
76
2.
candidate-elect when person 2. elected is declared ineligible, court cannot declare 2nd placer as elected, even if eligible
appointment court may determine as to who among the parties has legal title to office
IX.
ELECTION OFFENSES
(2) Any person, association, corporation, group or community who solicits or receives, directly or indirectly, any expenditure or promise of any office or employment, public or private, for any of the foregoing considerations. (Sec. 261, B.P. 881) One of the effective ways of preventing the commission of vote-buying and of prosecuting those committing it is the grant of immunity from criminal liability in favor of the party (person/s) whose vote was bought. This grant of immunity will encourage the recipient or acceptor to come into the open and denounce the culpritcandidate, and will ensure the successful prosecution of the criminal case against the latter. (Comelec vs. Hon. Tagle, G.R. Nos. 148948 & 148951, February 17, 2003)
Vote-Buying and Vote-Selling (1) Any person who gives, offers or promises money or anything of value, gives or promises any office or employment, franchise or grant, public or private, or makes or offers to make an expenditure, directly or indirectly, or cause an expenditure to be made to any person, association, corporation, entity, or community in order to induce anyone or the public in general to vote for or against any candidate or withhold his vote in the election, or to vote for or against any aspirant for the nomination or choice of a candidate in a convention or similar selection process of a political party.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
78
and arising out of contracts or any other source of prestation involving LGU, shall be governed by original terms and conditions of said contracts or law in force at time such rights were vested; and 6. resolution of controversies arising under LGC of 1991 where no legal provision or jurisprudence applies, resort may be had to customs and traditions in place where controversies take place. II. PUBLIC CORPORATION - one formed and organized for the government of a portion of the State. Elements of Public Corporation: 1. legal creation or incorporation; 2. corporate name; 3. inhabitants; and 4. territory. Classes of Corporation: 1. Quasi-corporation public corporations created as agencies of State for narrow and limited purposes. 2. Municipal corporation body politic and corporate constituted by incorporation of inhabitants of city or town purposes of local government thereof or as agency of State to assist in civil government of the country. 3. Quasi-public corporation private corporation that renders public service or supplies public wants. PUBLIC CORPORATION
1. established for purposes of administration of civil and local governments 2. creation of State either by special or general act 3. involuntary consequence legislation
III. DE FACTO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Requisites: 1. valid law authorizing incorporation; 2. attempt in good faith to organize under it; 3. colorable compliance with law; and 4. assumption of corporate powers.
IV. TERRITORIAL AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS ENJOYING LOCAL AUTONOMY: 1. Province cluster of municipalities, or municipalities and component cities, and serves as dynamic mechanism for developmental processes and effective governance of LGUs within its territorial jurisdiction. 2. City composed of more urbanized and developed barangays, serves as a general purpose government for coordination and delivery of basic, regular and direct services and effective governance of inhabitants within its territorial jurisdiction; Municipality consisting of group of barangays, serves primarily as a general purpose government for coordination and delivery of basic, regular and direct services and effective governance of inhabitants within its territorial jurisdiction; Barangay basic political unit which serves as primary planning and implementing unit of government policies, plans, programs, projects and activities in community, and as a forum wherein collective views of people may be expressed, crystalized and considered and where disputes may be amicably settled; Autonomous Regions created for decentralization of administration or decentralization of government; and
AND
3.
PRIVATE CORPORATION
1. created for private aim, gain or benefit of members
4.
2. created by will of incorporators with recognizance of State 3. voluntary agreement by and among members
5.
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Creation of Municipal Corporations 1. For province, city or municipality, only by Act of Congress; 2. For barangays, ordinance passed by respective Sanggunian
Plebiscite Requirement approved by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite called for the purpose in the political unit/s directly affected (Sec. 10, R.A. 7160) Based on verifiable indicators of viability and projected capacity to provide services (Sec. 7, R.A. 7160) [Note: see Annex C]
Beginning of Corporate Existence upon election and qualification of its chief executive and majority of members of its Sanggunian, unless some other time is fixed therefore by law or ordinance creating it. Mode of Inquiry to Legal Existence of LGU: Quo warranto which is reserved to State or other direct proceedings Abolition of LGU: When income, population, or land area of LGU has been reduced to less than minimum standards prescribed for its creation. The law or ordinance abolishing LGU shall specify the province, city, municipality or barangay with which LGU sought to be abolished will be incorporated or merged. Division and Merger of LGUs shall comply with same requirements, provided: 1. shall not reduce income, population or land area of LGU concerned to less than the minimum requirements prescribed;
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
80
6.
Limited by following percentage of total agricultural land area: a. for HUC and independent component cities: 15%; b. for component cities and 1st to 3rd class municipalities: 10% ; and c. for 4th to 6th class municipalities: 5%. Closure and opening of roads (Sec. 21 of RA 7160)
Requisites for validity: a. must not contravene the Constitution and any statute; b. must not be unfair or oppressive; c. must not be partial or discriminatory; d. must not prohibit, but may regulate trade; e. must not be unreasonable; and f. must be general in application and consistent with public policy. Barangay Chairman has no veto power. Corporate Powers of LGU: 1. to have continuous succession in its corporate name; 2. to sue and be sued; 3. to have and use a corporate seal; 4. to acquire and convey real or personal property; 5. power to enter into contracts; Requisites of valid municipal contracts: a. LGU has express, implied, or inherent power to enter into a particular contract; b. Entered into by proper department, board, committee, or agent; c. Must comply with substantive requirements; d. Must comply with formal requirements; and e. In case entered into by local chief executive on behalf of LGU, prior authorization by Sanggunian concerned is needed 6. to exercise such other powers as granted to corporation, subject to limitations provided in Local Government Code of 1991 and other laws. VI. MUNICIPAL LIABILITY: Rule: Local government units and their officials are not exempt from liability for death or injury to persons or damage to property (Sec. 24, R.A. 7160) 1. Statutory provisions on liability: a. Art. 2189, Civil Code defective condition of roads, streets,
AND
In case of permanent closure: a. adequate provision for public safety must be made; and b. may be properly used or conveyed for any purpose for which other real property may be lawfully used or conveyed; provided no freedom park be permanently closed without provisions or transfer to new site. 7. Local legislative power (Secs. 4859 of RA 7160) Approval of ordinances: a. local chief executive with his signature on each and every page; b. if local chief executive vetoes the same, may be overridden by 2/3 vote of all sanggunian members; (i) grounds for veto: ordinance is ultra vires or prejudicial to public welfare; (ii) local chief executive may veto particular item/s of appropriation ordinance, adoption of local development plan and public investment plan, or ordinance directing payment of money or creating liability; and (iii) local chief executive may veto an ordinance only once; c. veto communicated to sanggunian within 15 days for province and 10 days for city or municipality.
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
b. d.
2. for a. b.
3. for Violation of Law 4. for Contracts if contract is: a. intra vires liable; b. ultra vires not liable Doctrine of Implied Municipal Liability a municipality may become obligated upon an implied contract to pay the reasonable value of the benefits accepted or appropriated by it as to which it has the general power to contract (Province of Cebu v. IAC, 147 SCRA 447); the doctrine applies to all cases where money or other property of a party is received under such circumstances that the general law, independent of an express contract, implies an obligation to do justice with respect to the same (Nachura, Reviewer in Political Law, p. 431) VII. QUALIFICATION OF ELECTIVE LOCAL OFFICIALS: 1. citizen of the Philippines; 2. registered voter of barangay, municipality, city, province, or district where he intends to be elected; 3. resident therein for at least 1 year preceding election; 4. able to read and write Filipino or local language or dialect; and 5. age: a. 23 years of age Governor, Vice Governor, Board Member, Mayor, Vice Mayor or Member of City Council for HUCs. b. 21 years of age Mayor or Vice Mayor of ICCs, component cities or municipalities;
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
82
(iii.)
bayan president of liga ng mga barangay and the pederasyon ng mga sanggunian kabataan
3. Sectoral representatives women, worker, urban poor, and other sectors allowed by law. Date of Election: Every 3 years on 2nd Monday of May, unless otherwise provided by law. Term of Office: 3 years starting from noon of June 30 next following the election or such date as may be provided by law, except that of elective barangay officials, for maximum of 3 consecutive terms in same position. Consecutive: After three consecutive terms, an elective local official cannot seek immediate reelection for a fourth term. The prohibited election refers to the next regular election for the same office following the end of the third consecutive term. Any other subsequent election, like a recall election is no longer covered by the prohibition (Socrates vs. Comelec, G.R. No. 154512, November 12, 2002). IX. GROUNDS FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS: 1. disloyalty to the Republic; 2. culpable violation of Constitution;
3. dishonesty, oppression, misconduct in office, gross negligence or dereliction of duty; 4. commission of offense involving moral turpitude or offense punishable by at least prision mayor; 5. abuse of authority; 6. unauthorized absence for 15 consecutive working days except sanggunian members; 7. application for, acquisition of , foreign citizenship or residence or status of an immigrant of another country; and 8. such other grounds as may be provided in EC and other laws Under Sec. 60 of RA 7160 an elective local official may be removed from office on the grounds enumerated above by order of the proper court only (Salalima vs Guingona, 257 SCRA 55)
the
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
84
(iii)attended by opinio juris or sense of legal obligation c. general principle of law. 2. Subsidiary a. Judicial decisions; b. writings of publicists; and c. Advisory Opinions of the ICJ. Constitution vs. Treaty Generally, the treaty is rejected in the local forum but is upheld by international tribunals as a demandable obligation of the signatories under the maxim pacta sunt servanda. The treaty is always subject to qualification or amendment by a subsequent law, and the same may never curtail or restrict the scope of the police power of the State. (Ichong v. Hernandez, GR no.L-7995, May 31, 1957) Functions of International Law: 1. promote international peace and security; 2. foster friendly relations among nations and discourage use of force in resolution of difference among them; 3. provide for orderly regulation of conduct of states in their mutual dealings; and 4. ensure international cooperation in pursuit of certain common purposes of economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character. INTERNATIONAL LAW
1. Law of coordination Regulates relation of states and other international persons 1.
MUNICIPAL LAW
Law of subordination (issued by political superior) Regulates relations of individuals among themselves or with their own states
2.
2.
AND
S UBJECT
3.
Derived principally from treaties, international customs and general principles of law
3.
Consists mainly of statutory enactments, and to lesser extent executive orders and judicial pronouncements
4.
4.
Redressed thru local administrative and judicial processes Breach of which entails individual responsibility
5.
Collective responsibility because it attaches directly to the state and not to its nationals
5.
Doctrine of incorporation international law are adopted as part of a states municipal law, by a general provision or clause usually in its Constitution. (Sec. 2, Art. II, 1987 Constitution) Doctrine of transformation requires the enactment by the legislative body of such international law principles as are sought to be part of municipal law. II. SUBJECTS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: - entity that has rights and responsibilities under international law and having capacity to maintain its rights by bringing international claims, includes: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. States, independent and dependent; Colonies and dependencies; Mandates and trust territories; The Vatican; The United Nations; Belligerent Communities; International administrative Bodies; and Individuals, to a certain extent. Belligerent Community group of rebels under an organized civil government who have taken up arms
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
86
4.
Trusteeship Council organ charged with administration of International Trusteeship System (idle council); 5. International Court of Justice judicial organ of UN; World Court governed by Statute which is annexed to and made part of UN charter; Jurisdiction: decide issues referred to it (consensual). a. interpretation of treaty; b. question of international law; c. existence of fact constituting a breach of international obligation; d. nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation. 6. Secretariat chief administrative organ of UN. State a group of people, living together in a fixed territory, organized for political ends under an independent government and capable of entering into international relations with other states Creation of State: (RUSIA2) 1.by peaceful acquisition of Independence (Philippines) ; 2. by Revolution (USA); 3. by Unification of several states (Italy); 4.by Secession (Bangladesh); 5.by Agreement (Netherlands); and 6.by Attainment of civilization (Japan). Extinction of State: ( MA2D2EP) 1. Overthrow of government resulting in anarchy; 2. Emigration en masse of its population; 3. Annexation; 4. Merger or unification; 5. Dismemberment; 6. Dissolution of federal union; 7. Partial loss of independence
C HAIRPERSONS
Principle of State Continuity the state continues as a juristic being notwithstanding changes in its circumstances provided only that such change do not result in the loss of any of its essential elements III. RECOGNITION act by which a state acknowledges existence of another state, government or belligerent community and indicates its willingness to deal with the entity as such under rules of international law. Theories: 1. Declaratory merely affirms an existing fact like the possession by the state of the essential elements. Discretionary and political; 2. Constitutive - it is the act of recognition that constitutes the entity into an international person. Compulsory and legal; may be compelled once the elements of a state are established. Objects: 1. State generally held to be irrevocable and imports the recognition of its govt. 2. Government may be withdrawn and does not necessarily signify the existence of a state, as the government may be that of a mere colony. 3. Belligerent community rebels are accorded international personality only in connection with the hostilities they are waging. Kinds: 1. express or implied; and 2. conditional or permanent Effects of Recognition of a State or Government: 1. Diplomatic relations; 2. Right to sue in courts of recognizing state; 3. Right to possession of properties of predecessor on the reorganizing state.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
Requisites for recognition de jure: 1. Government is stable and effective; 2. No substantial resistance to its authority; 3. The government must show willingness and ability to discharge its international obligations; and 4. The government must enjoy popular consent or approval of the people. absence of one recognition de facto RECOGNITION DE JURE
1. Relatively permanent 1.
RECOGNITION DE FACTO
Provisional (duration of armed struggle) does NOT vest title to properties of government abroad limited to certain juridical relations
2.
to of
2.
3.
3.
IV. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF STATES (TILE2) 1. Existence and self-defense; 2. Sovereignty and Independence; 3. Equality; 4. Territorial Integrity and jurisdiction; 5. Legation or diplomatic intercourse A. RIGHT TO EXISTENCE AND SELFDEFENSE most comprehensive as all other rights of state flow from it; state may take measures including use of force as may be necessary to counteract any danger to its existence.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
88
Aggression use of armed force by a state against sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another state or in other manner inconsistent with the UN charter. Requisites for Proper Exercise of Right of Self-defense: 1. armed attack; 2. self-defensive action taken by attacked state must be reported immediately to Security Council; and 3. such action shall not in any way affect right of Security Council to take at any time action as it deems necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. B. RIGHT OF SOVEREIGNTY AND INDEPENDENCE Sovereignty totality of the powers, legal competence, and privileges arising from customary international law, and not dependent on the consent of another state Independence means freedom from control by other state or group of states and not freedom from the restrictions that are binding on all states forming the family of nations; carries with it by necessary implication the correlative duty of non-intervention C. RIGHT OF EQUALITY every state is entitled to same protection and respect as are available to other state under rules of international law. D. RIGHT TO TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND JURISDICTION Components of the Territory of A State: 1. Terrestrial land mass on which the inhabitants live; 2. Maritime and Fluvial a. internal or national waters bodies of water within the land mass, among them are:
(i) rivers which may be (a) national; (b) boundary; (c) international (iA) Thalweg Doctrine for boundary rivers, in the absence of an agreement between the riparian states, the boundary line is laid on the middle of the main navigable channel. (iB) Middle of the Bridge Doctrine where there is a bridge over a boundary river, the boundary line is middle or center of the bridge. (ii) bays and gulfs (iii) strait b. Archipelagic waters ARCHIPELAGO DOCTRINE The waters around, between and connecting the islands of the archipelago regardless of their breadth and dimensions are to be treated as internal waters Two kinds of archipelago: 1. coastal situated close to a mainland and may be considered a part thereof; e.g. Loften Islands, Norway. 2. mid-ocean situated in the ocean at such distance from the coasts of firm land. e.g. Indonesia. c. Territorial sea d. Submarine area 3. Aerial domain MODES OF ACQUIRING TERRITORY
1. 2. Discovery and occupation Cession 1. 2. 3. 4.
LOSS OF TERRITORY
Dereliction Cession Conquest
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
90
1. Pursuit commence from internal water, territorial sea or contiguous zone of pursuing state; 2. Continuous and unabated; 3. Conducted by warship, military aircraft, government ships authorized for the purpose; 4. Ceases as soon as the ship being pursued enters the territorial sea of its own, or of a third, state. E. RIGHT OF LEGATION right of state to maintain diplomatic relations with other states Governed by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) Active right of legation send diplomatic representatives Passive right of legation receive diplomatic representatives Agents of Diplomatic Intercourse: 1. head of state; 2. foreign secretary of minister; or 3. members of diplomatic service. Functions of Diplomatic Missions: 1. representing sending state in receiving state; 2. protecting in receiving state interests of sending state and its nationals; 3. negotiating with government of receiving state; 4. promoting friendly relations between sending and receiving states and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations; 5. ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in receiving state and reporting thereon to government of sending state; and 6. in some cases, representing friendly governments at their request. Agreation process in appointment of diplomatic envoy. Where states resort to an informal inquiry (enquiry) as to the acceptability of a particular envoy, to
C HAIRPERSONS
which the receiving state responds with an informal conformity (agreement). Letre de Creance(Letter of Credence) with the name, rank and general character of his mission, and a request for favorable reception and full credence. Kinds of Consuls 1. consules missi professional or career consuls who are nationals of sending state and are required to devote their full-time to discharge their duties; and 2. consules electi may or not be nationals of sending state and perform consular functions only in addition to their regular callings. Ranks: 1. consul-general heads several consular districts, or one exceptionally large consular district; 2. consul takes charge of a small district or town or port; 3. vice-consul assists the consul; and 4. consular agent usually entrusted with the performance of certain functions by the consul. Privileges and Immunities Accorded to Diplomatic Envoy: (PCLIST) 1. Inviolability of premises and archives; 2. Right of official communications; 3. Exemption from local jurisdiction; 4. Personal inviolability; 5. Exemption from subpoena; and 6. Exemption from taxation/custom duties. Exterritoriality exception of persons and property from local jurisdiction on basis of international customs. If the acts giving rise to a suit are those of a foreign government done by its foreign agent, although not necessarily a diplomatic personage, but acting in his official capacity, the
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
objects
of
Doctrine of Unequal Treaties treaties which have been imposed in an unequal character, are void. Jus Cogens customary international law that has attained the status of a peremptory norm, accepted and
Termination of Treaty: (NEW DEVIL (made) VITAL) ACCOMPLISHMENT 1. expiration of term; 2. accomplishment of purpose; 3. impossibility of performance; 4. loss of subject matter; 5. novation; 6. desistance of parties; 7. extinction of one of parties, if treaty is bipartite; 8. occurrence of vital change of circumstance; 9. outbreak of war; and 10. voidance of treaty.
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
92
Protocol de cloture an instrument which records the winding up of the proceedings of a diplomatic conference and usually includes a reproduction of the texts of treaties, conventions, recommendations and other acts agreed upon and signed by the plenipotentiaries attending the conference. It is not the treaty itself and does not require the concurrence of the Senate. (Taada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18). TREATY
1. Basic political issues ; changes of national policies permanent international agreements 1.
VI . NATIONALITY AND STATELESSNESS Doctrine of Effective Nationality expressed in Art.5 of the Hague Convention of 1930 on the Conflict of Nationality Laws that states that within a third State a person having more than one nationality shall be treated as if he had only one either the nationality of the country in which he is habitually and principally resident or the nationality of the country with which in the circumstances he appears to be in fact most closely connected. (Frivaldo v. Comelec, 174 SCRA 245) Statelessness condition or status of individual who is born without any nationality or who loses his nationality without retaining or acquiring another. Treatment of Stateless Individual - international conventions provide that stateless individuals are to be treated more or less like the subjects of a foreign state. Reintegration recovery of nationality by individuals who are natural born citizens of a state, but who lost their nationality. VII . TREATMENT OF ALIENS Flowing from its right to existence and as an attribute of sovereignty, no State is under obligation to admit aliens. The State can determine in what cases and under what conditions it may admit aliens
EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT
adjustment of details carrying out established national policies temporary arrangements
2.
Validity of the Balikatan Exercises - The VFA permits United States personnel to engage, on an impermanent basis, in "activities," the exact meaning of which was left undefined. The expression is ambiguous, permitting a wide scope of undertakings subject only to the approval of the Philippine government. After studied reflection, it appeared farfetched that the ambiguity surrounding the meaning of the word "activities" arose from accident. In our view, it was deliberately made that way to give both parties a certain leeway in negotiation. In this manner, visiting US forces may sojourn in Philippine territory for purposes other than military. As conceived, the joint exercises may include training on new techniques of patrol and surveillance to protect the nation's marine resources, sea searchand-rescue operations to assist vessels in distress, disaster relief operations, civic action projects such as the building of schoolhouses, medical and humanitarian missions, and the like (Lim vs. Honorable Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 151445, April 11, 2002).
Deportation expulsion of an alien considered undesirable by local state, usually but not necessarily to his own state. Reconduction -- forcible conveying of aliens back to their home state without any formalities A. Doctrine of State Responsibility state may be held liable for injuries and damages sustained by the alien
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
6. offense must have been committed within the territory or against the interest of the demanding State 7. double criminality -- act for which the extradition is sought
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
94
must be punishable in both States Procedure for Extradition (Judicial and diplomatic process of request and surrender) PD 1069 1. Request through diplomatic representative with: a. decision of conviction; b. criminal charge and warrant of arrest; c. recital of facts; d. text of applicable law designating the offense; e. pertinent papers; 2. DFA forwards request to DOJ; 3. DOJ files petition for extradition with RTC; 4. Upon receipt of a petition for extradition and its supporting documents, the judge must study them and make, as soon as possible, a prima facie finding whether (a) they are sufficient in form and substance, (b) they show compliance with the Extradition Treaty and Law, and (c) the person sought is extraditable. At his discretion, the judge may require the submission of further documentation or may personally examine the affiants and witnesses of the petitioner. If, in spite of this study and examination, no prima facie finding is possible, the petition may be dismissed at the discretion of the judge. On the other hand, if the presence of a prima facie case is determined, then the magistrate must immediately issue a warrant for the arrest of the extraditee, who is at the same time summoned to answer the petition and to appear at scheduled summary hearings. Prior to the issuance of the warrant, the judge must not inform or notify the potential extraditee of the
pendency of the petition, lest the latter be given the opportunity to escape and frustrate the proceedings. The foregoing procedure will best serve the ends of justice in extradition cases; (Government of the US vs. Hon. Purganan and Mark Jimenez G.R. No. G.R. No. 148571. September 24, 2002) 5. hearing (provide counsel de officio if necessary); 6. appeal to CA within ten days whose decision shall be final and executory; 7. Decision forwarded to DFA through the DOJ; 8. Individual placed at the disposal of the authorities of requesting state costs and expenses to be shouldered by requesting state. A state may not compel another state to extradite a criminal without going through the legal processes provided in the laws of the former. Due process requirement complied at the RTC level upon filing of petition for extradition. No need to notify the person subject of the extradition process when the application is still with the DFA or DOJ Extradition is not a criminal proceeding which will call into operation all the rights of an accused provided in the bill of rights For the provisional arrest of an accused to continue, the formal request for extradition is not required to be filed in court it only needs to be received by the requested state in accordance with PD 1069
Entitlement to Bail As suggested by the use of the word conviction, the constitutional provision on bail, as well as Section 4 of Rule 114 of the Rules of Court, applies only when a person has been arrested and detained for violation of Philippine criminal laws. It does not apply to
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)
CHAIRPERSON: Jonathan Mangundayao ASST. CHAIRPERSON: Andre Jacobo EDP: Shantel Aceret MEMBERS: Jeff Alarilla, Carlo Bautista, Mark Anthony Bayquen, Ian Camara, Barbara Jill Clara, Ryan Co, Bethany Conde, Beatriz Geronilla, Mary Ann Charisma Gutierrez, Christopher Linag, Hazel Manaog, Leah Merida, Jenery Perez. Fred Prieto, Russel Tacla, Ma.Melissa Yoro, Joy Zabala
96
absolutely necessary for purposes of war; and 3. Principle of Chivalry basis of such rules as those that require belligerents to give proper warning before launching a bombardment or prohibit use of perfidy (treachery) in conduct of hostilities. Participants in War: 1. Combatants a. non-privileged; b. privileged. 2. Spies; 3. Mercenaries. Rights of a Prisoner of War: 1. To be treated humanely; 2. Not subject to torture; 3. Allowed to communicate with their families; 4. Receive food, clothing, religious articles, medicine; 5. bare minimum of information; 6. keep personal belongings 7. proper burial; 8. group according to nationality; 9. establishment of an information bureau; 10. repatriation for sick and wounded (1949 Geneva Convention) Termination of War: 1. simple cessation of hostilities; 2. conclusion of a negotiated treaty of peace; and 3. defeat of one of belligerents.
X. NEUTRALITY condition of state that does not take part, directly or indirectly in war between other states. NEUTRALITY 1. dependent
on attitude of neutral state, which is free to join either of belligerents any time it sees fit
NEUTRALIZATION
1. result of treaty wherein duration and other conditions are agreed upon by neutralized state and other states governed by neutralization agreement intended operate peace and war to in in
2. governed by laws
of nations
2.
3. obtains
only
3.
during war
4.
Angary belligerent may upon payment of just compensation, seize, use or destroy, in case of urgent necessity for purposes of offense or defense neutral property found in its territory, in enemy territory or on high seas.
AND
S UBJECT
Maricel Abarentos (Over-all Chairperson), Ronald Jalmanzar (Over-all Vice Chair), Yolanda Tolentino(VC-Acads), Jennifer Ang (VC- Secretariat), Joy Inductivo (VC-Finance), Elaine Masukat (VCEDP), Anna Margarita Eres (VC-Logistics) Jonathan Mangundayao (Political Law), Francis Benedict Reotutar (Labor Law), Romuald Padilla (Civil Law), Charmaine Torres (Taxation Law), Mark David Martinez (Criminal Law), Garny Luisa Alegre (Commercial Law), Jinky Ann Uy (Remedial Law), Jackie Lou Bautista (Legal Ethics)