MATEO NOTES Constitutional Law 1
MATEO NOTES Constitutional Law 1
MATEO NOTES Constitutional Law 1
Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
February 2, 1987 as pronounced by the The Constitution governing the Philippines before 1935
Supreme Court in the case of De Leon vs. was the Malolos Constitution. It was not recognized as
Esguerra. constitution because during those times the Philippines
is not an independent country.
Parts of the Constitution
a. Constitution of Government - provides for the
8. How do you propose amendments to the Constitution?
organization of government, and enumerates the
(Article 17)
powers of the same (general governmental
a. By the Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths
framework)
(3/4) of all its members/through the Congress
b. Constitution of Liberty - provides for the civil and
acting as a constituent assembly; [Article 17,
political rights of citizens and the limitations on the
Section 1(1)]
powers of government to secure those rights.
*each house may separately formulate
c. Constitution of Sovereignty – provides ways of
amendments by a vote of 3/4s of all its
amending the constitution
members, and then pass it on to the other
Interpretation of the Consitution house for a similar process*
a. Verba legis – words used in the Constitution must be b. By a constitutional convention; or [Article 17,
given their ordinary meaning Section 1(2)]
b. Ratio legis et anima – the words of the constitution *2/3 vote of Congress or majority vote of
should be interpreted in accordance with the intent registered voters*
of the framers c. Direct proposal by the people through
c. Ut magis valeat quam pereat – the Constitution has initiative/people’s initiative [Article 17, Section 2]
to be interpreted as a whole Requisites:
12% vote- total national registered voters
6. What were the constitutions of the Philippines? 3% vote – total legislative district registered
a. 1935 Commonwealth Constitution voters
b. 1973 Martial Law Constitution
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
d. Once every 5 years, no amendment 5 years - There is also revision if the change alters the substantial
following the ratification of the Constitution entirety of the Constitution, as when the change
Enabling law from the Congress affects substantial provisions of the Constitution
9. How do you propose revisions to the Constitution? 12. What are the two tests to determine whether the
a. By the Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths proposal is an amendment or revision? (Lambino vs.
(3/4) of all its members/through the Congress COMELEC)
acting as a constituent assembly; or [Article 17,
Section 1(1)] Quantitative Test
b. By a constitutional convention which is called - Whether the proposed amendment is so extensive in its
by two-thirds (2/3) vote of all the members of provisions as to change directly the substance entirety
the Congress, or by a majority vote of all the of the constitution by the delegation or alteration of
members of the Congress in case the question numerous provisions.
of calling such a convention is submitted to the - The court examines only the number of provisions
electorate [Article 17, Section 3] affected
- Does not consider the degree of changes
10. What is an amendment? (Lambino vs. COMELEC)
Qualitative Test
- It refers to isolated or piecemeal change in the
Constitution. - Whether the change will accomplish such far reaching
- Amendment broadly refers to a change that adds, changes in the nature of our basic governmental plan
reduces, or deletes without altering the basic principle as to amount to a revision
involved
- Amendment generally affects only the specific Should both the tests be present to determine whether
provision being amended. the proposal is an amendment or revision?
propose revisions to the Constitution. The framers 15. What is the difference between the law-making powers
intended, and wrote, that a people’s initiative may of Congress from its constituent powers?
propose only amendments to the Constitution. Where
the intent and language of the Constitution clearly The word “constituent” means citizens. The power to
withhold from the people the power to propose amend the Constitution is not inherent in the Congress.
revisions to the Constitution, the people cannot It is inherent in the people. However, by express
propose revisions even as they are empowered to provision of the Constitution, the people (who, in the
propose amendments. first place, made the Constitution) gave the Congress
the power to amend. Hence, the Congress is not acting
14. In People’s initiative, what should be included in the in its ordinary capacity to legislate, but as people
petition? themselves.
a. Petition
Doctrine of Fair and Proper Submission
b. Full text of the proposed amendments which must
- A plebiscite may be held on the same day as regular
be embodied in number 1 or at least attached
election provided the people are sufficiently informed
thereto and such fact of attachment is stated in the
of the amendments to be voted upon, to
petition
conscientiously deliberate thereon, and to express their
c. Twelve percent (12%) of total registered voters;
will in a genuine manner. (Gonzales vs. COMELEC)
three percent (3%) of registered voters in each
- Submission of piece-meal amendments is
representative district/legislative district
unconstitutional. All the amendments (as a whole) must
d. Authentication of the signatures by the Commission
be submitted for ratification at one plebiscite only.
on Elections (COMELEC)
(Tolentino vs. COMELEC)
e. Amendment, not revision
f. Once every five (5) years
Ratification [Article 17, Section 4]
g. Enabling law from the Congress
- After submission, the proposed changes shall be valid
h. Must contain only one topic (Hodgepodge or log-
when ratified by the majority votes cast in a plebiscite.
rolling is not allowed. The proposed amendment
- 60-90 DAY RULE
must embrace only one topic because if it contains
No election shall be held within 60 days from the
two topics, the people will be forced to accept two
submission of the proposal
changes even if they do not want the other.)
No election shall be held after 90 days from the
submission of the proposal
Thus, election will be held on the 61st to the 90th
day only
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
Exercises Sovereignty Does not exercise PEOPLE – People refers simply to the inhabitants of the
sovereignty State.
May comprise of many May comprise of many
nations states 4. What are the specific requirements in the element of
- Israel - Arab Nation “people”?
- Canada
There is no requirement as to the number of people
that should compose a State, however, they must be
State is not similar to a nation. The state is a
numerous enough to be self-sufficing and to defend
political/legal concept while the nation is an
themselves and small enough to be easily administered
ethnic/racial concept. The state as a political/legal
and sustained. People must come from both sexes to
concept means that the state is an abstract, ideal
be able to procreate.
person, existing only in contemplation of law. It is
composed of its elements, to wit, people, territory,
TERRITORY – Fixed portion of the surface of the earth
government, and sovereignty. The nation as an
inhabited by the people of the State
ethnic/racial concept means that the people are
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
“The national territory comprises the Philippine Archipelago – It is a group of islands, including parts of
archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced islands, interconnecting waters and other natural
therein, and all other territories over which the features which are so closely interrelated that such
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
islands, waters and other natural features form an Scarborough Shoal. Thus, the regime of islands are
intrinsic geographical, economic and political entity, or still part of the Philippine national territory.
which historically have been regarded as such. Simply
stated, it is a body of water studded or surrounded by
islands.
11. What would qualify an island? [Article 121(1), UNCLOS
Archipelagic Waters – The waters around, between, III]
and connecting the islands of the archipelago, An island is a naturally formed area of land, surrounded
regardless of their breadth and dimensions by water, which is above water at high tide
Archipelagic Doctrine – It is a principle which considers
12. What is the difference between normal baseline
the group of islands as one integrated unit. For this
method and straight baseline method?
purpose, it requires that straight baselines be drawn by
Normal baseline method follows the sinuses and
connecting the appropriate points of the outermost
curvatures of the islands while straight baseline method
islands to encircle the islands within the archipelago.
determines the outermost points of the outermost
We consider all the waters enclosed by the straight
islands then connects them.
baselines as internal waters.
9. What are the terrestrial or maritime features of the 13. Are our internal waters included in the right to innocent
Philippine territory? passage?
- Territorial Sea – 12 nm from the baseline - No. The law does not provide in UNCLOS III and RA
- Seabed – sea floor or sea bottom 9522 that our internal waters are subject to the right
- Subsoil – beneath the surface soil and the seabed of innocent passage. The right to innocent passage
- Insular shelves will be applicable only outside the 24NM
- Other submarine areas contiguous zone and within the 200NM EEZ. If one
state traverses the area within the territorial seas,
10. Are the “regime of islands” part of the Philippine the state must ask permission from the local state or
national territory? Does the Philippines has jurisdiction atleast there must be a bilateral agreement
over these islands? between those states. Thus, there is no innocent
Yes. In the case of Magallona v Ermita, the court passage within our internal waters unless permitted
ruled that under Section 2 of RA 9522, the law by the state.
commits to text the Philippines’ continued claim of
sovereignty and jurisdiction over the KIG and the
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
No. In PVTA vs.CIR, the Supreme Court held that such - By violence/force/the voice of the majority
distinction has been obsolete and blurred because of the (e.g. Government of England under the
repudiation of the laissez faire policy in the Constitution. The Commonwealth, first by Parliament and later by
government, under the Constitution, is under an obligation to Cromwell as Protector)
promote social justice - By insurrection (*insurrection – rebellion on a smaller
scale)
Doctrine of Parents Patriae (e.g. Government of the Southern Confederacy
- The government as guardian of the rights of the people in revolt against the Union during the war of
may initiate legal actions an in behalf of particular secession in the United States)
individual. - By military forces/war/government of paramount force
- It means parent of the country. The State acts as the (e.g. Castine in Maine, which was reduced to a
guardian of persons under disabilities. British possession in the war of 1812; Tampico,
Mexico, occupied during the war with Mexico
DE JURE GOVERNMENT by the troops of the United States; Second
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
Part III – State Immunity e. When the suit is against a government officer but
the ultimate liability will belong not to the officer but
1. What is the legal basis of the Doctrine of Immunity? to the government.
(Article 16, Section 3)
“The State may not be sued without its consent.” 4. How do you know if a suit against a public officer is a
suit against the state?
This provision reflects nothing less than a recognition of If it would require the government to do an affirmative
the sovereign character of the State and an express act. Affirmative act may be in the form of: money,
affirmation of the unwritten rule insulating it from the payment of damages, fund, appropriation, interests,
jurisdiction of the courts of justice. It is based on the properties
very essence of sovereignty.
5. When can a public officer be sued?
2. What is that doctrine stating state immunity? As enumerated in Sanders vs. Veridiano, there are
Doctrine of royal prerogative of dishonesty exceptions in which a public officer may be sued
- There can be no legal right against the authority without prior consent of the State, to wit:
which makes the law on which the right depends. - to compel him to do an act required by law
(Justice Holmes) - to sue him in his personal capacity
- Grants the state the prerogative to defeat any - to restrain him from enforcing an act claimed to be
legitimate claim against it simply by invoking its non- unconstitutional;
suability. - to compel the payment of damages refund;
- to secure a judgment that the officer impleaded
3. What are the tests to determine if the suit is a suit
may satisfy by himself without the State having to
against the state?
do a positive act to assist him; and
a. If it would require the government to do an
- where the government itself has violated its own
affirmative act. Affirmative act may be in the form
laws (e.g. recovery of property unjustly taken)
of: money, payment of damages, fund,
appropriation, interests, properties
6. How do you determine if a government agency can be
b. If it produces adverse consequence on the public
sued?
treasury.
- Determine whether the agency is incorporated or
c. The republic is sued by its name unincorporated.
d. The suit is against an unincorporated agency - If unincorporated, determine whether primary
function is governmental or proprietary.
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
If governmental, it is a suit against the State. The United Nations, as well as its organs and specialized
Consent must be determined. agencies, are likewise beyond the jurisdiction of local
If proprietary, it is not a suit against the State. courts
Case should not be dismissed.
- If incorporated, look at its charter.
10. What is the basis on the principle that International
Suable or not suable if charter says so
Organization or Agencies can invoke immunity?
If charter is silent, look at its function. G – not
Treaties where Philippines is a signatory
suable; P – suable
Bilateral Agreements
Municipal Corporations can always sue and
Consent given by DFA
be sued
Special Law
7. Can public funds be subject to writ of execution or
garnishment? No
11. According to the VCDR, who are members of the
General Rule: Whether the money is deposited by way
diplomatic mission that are immune from suit? (Art. 31.
of general or special deposit, it remains as government
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations)
funds and may not be subject to garnishment.
- Sovereigns and other heads of state
- Ambassadors, ministers, plenipotentiary, minister
Exception: When a law or an ordinance has been
resident and charges d’ affaires.
enacted appropriating a specific amount to pay a
- Consuls to a certain extent
valid government obligation, then the money can be
garnished.
12. What are the types of consent?
Express Consent
8. What is the basis on the principle that other states can
- general law Money claims arising from contracts
invoke immunity?
must be filed in COA; COA must act upon within 60
Par in parem non habet imperium
days; rejection of the claim authorizes the claimant
- An equal has no power over an equal. All States as
to elevate the matter to the Supreme Court.
sovereign equals cannot assert jurisdiction over one
- special law must be embodied to a duly
another.
enacted statute and may not be given by a mere
counsel of the government
9. What is the basis on the principle that the United
Nations can invoke immunity? (1946 Convention on the Implied Consent
Privileges and Immunities of the UN) - State itself commences litigation or files a suit.
- State enters into a contract in its proprietary
capacity.
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
13. At what point shall the state invoke immunity? Before or 16. A is a public officer working in a government agency
during the suit? which has a proprietary function. A acts in good faith
Before the suit. If trial already started, the state can no and performs his duties. Can A invoke state immunity?
longer invoke state of immunity.
17. A sues B who is a public officer. B committed the act in
14. Is suability the same as liability? the discharge of his official function and in the scope of
No. Suability depends on the consent of the State to be his authority. Can B invoke state immunity?
sued; liability on the applicable law and the
established facts. The circumstance that a State is Yes. In a Supreme Court decision, if a government
suable does not necessarily mean that it is liable. On official committed an act in the discharge of his official
the other hand, it 1 can never be held liable if it does function and in the scope of his authority, the suit
not first consent to be sued. Liability is not conceded by against him will be a suit against the state for the
the mere fact that the State has allowed itself to be ultimate liability will belong not to the officer but to the
sued. When the State waives its sovereign immunity, it is government.
only giving the plaintiff the chance to prove, if it can,
that the defendant is liable. The State, in many cases, 18. Same facts but A sues B in his personal capacity. Can B
may be suable but not liable. invoke state immunity?
- “Social justice is neither communism, nor despotism, states, it is enforceable only in regard to the grants of rights,
nor atomism, nor anarchy, but the humanization of privileges and concessions covering national economy and
laws and the equalization of social and economic patrimony and not to every aspect of trade and commerce. It
forces by the State so that justice in its rational and refers to exceptions rather than the rule. The issue here is not
objectively secular conception may at least be whether this paragraph of Sec. 10 of Art. XII is self-executing or
approximated. Social justice means the promotion not. Rather, the issue is whether, as a rule, there are enough
of the welfare of all the people, the adoption by balancing provisions in the Constitution to allow the Senate to
the Government of measures calculated to insure ratify the Philippine concurrence in the WTO Agreement. And
economic stability of all the component elements we hold that there are.
of society, through the maintenance of a proper
economic and social equilibrium in the All told, while the Constitution indeed mandates a bias in favor
interrelations of the members of the community, of Filipino goods, services, labor and enterprises, at the same
constitutionally, through the adoption of measures time, it recognizes the need for business exchange with the rest
legally justifiable, or extra-constitutionally, through of the world on the bases of equality and reciprocity and limits
the exercise of powers underlying the existence of protection of Filipino enterprises only against foreign
all governments on the time-honored principle of competition and trade practices that are unfair. In other
salus populi est suprema lex.” words, the Constitution did not intend to pursue an isolationist
policy. It did not shut out foreign investments, goods and
17. When does life begin? services in the development of the Philippine economy. While
- Conception - It starts in the fertilization of the egg the Constitution does not encourage the unlimited entry of
cell and the sperm cell foreign goods, services and investments into the country, it
does not prohibit them either. In fact, it allows an exchange on
18. How can you reconcile the decision in MPH v GSIS and the basis of equality and reciprocity, frowning only on foreign
Tanada v Angara? competition that is unfair.
It is true that in the recent case of Manila Prince Hotel vs. 19. What is local autonomy?
Government Service Insurance System, et al., this Court held - Local autonomy under the 1987 Constitution simply
that Sec. 10, second par., Art. XII of the 1987 Constitution is a means “decentralization”. It does not mean
mandatory, positive command which is complete in itself and independence or make LGUs sovereign within the
which needs no further guidelines or implementing laws or rules state.
for its enforcement. From its very words the provision does not
require any legislation to put it in operation. It is per se judicially 20. What are the kinds of Decentralization?
enforceable. However, as the constitutional provision itself a. Decentralization of power
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
2. Can Judicial, Executive, Legislative power be Referendum – power of the electorate to approve or
delegated? reject a legislation through an election called for a
- Generally no, but there are exceptions. purpose
4. Who delegated the power to the three branches of the Requisites of a valid ordinance
government?
- The People Rationale: local legislatures are more knowledgeable
than national lawmaking body on matters of purely
5. Is the rule of non-delegation of powers absolute? local concern.
- No. There are permissible delegations.
Cardinal Principle: local affairs shall be managed by
local authorities and general affairs by the central
6. What are the permissible delegations?
authority.
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
10. What is the legal basis of the delegation to 12. What is the legal basis of the delegation of emergency
administrative bodies? powers?
- Charter - Article 6, Section 23, paragraph 2
11. What is the legal basis of the delegation of tariff 14. The power of the president to declare state of lawless
powers? violence – delegated power or inherent power?
- Article 6, Section 28, paragraph 2 - Inherent power given by the Constitution
- Tariff and Customs Code
15. What are instances that Congress can delegate
Power to fix: emergency powers?
a. Tariff rate - War
b. Import and export quotas - Other National Emergency - Majority is affected.
c. Tonnage The emergency must be of nationwide proportions
d. Wharfage dues and effect.
e. Other duties or imposts under the National a. Rebellion
Development Program of the Government b. Economic crisis
c. Pestilence or epidemic
d. Typhoon
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
POWERS OF THE
PROVISION NOTES LIMITATIONS
PRESIDENT
Article VII, Section 1 - power to enforce and administer laws - The President’s power could be exercised only as
Executive Power Executive power shall be vested in the - carry out laws in their practical operation may be provided by law
President of the Philippines - the President is not above the law but is obliged to obey and - e.g., power to confer the Order of National Artists
execute them. only in accordance with relevant laws
- not for him to determine the validity of a law - that is judicial
power
Alter egos
- must necessarily appoint the alter ego of his choice (cabinet
sec) before the permanent appointee of her choice should
assume office.
- Congress cannot impose on her the obligation to appoint the
undersecretary automatically because confidence in the
appointee is essential.
Removal - implied from the power of appointment (see - President cannot remove officials where the
above provision) Constitution prescribes certain methods for
- removal – forcible and permanent separation separation of such officers from public service (such
of the incumbent from office before the as chairmen and commissioners of con coms who
expiration of his term can be removed by impeachment only; judges who
are subject to the disciplinary power of the SC)
- President cannot remove elected local officials
- should be only exercised by a cause provided by
law
- members of the career service appointed by the
President may be directly disciplined by him
- Cabinet members and others whose continuity
depends upon the pleasure of the President may
be replaced at any time but it is by expiration and
not removal
Control Section 17. The President shall have control of - Control is the power of an officer to alter or modify or nullify - power to reorganize should be done in good faith
all the executive departments, bureaus, and aside what a subordinate officer had done in the
offices. He shall ensure that the laws be performance of his duties to substitute the judgment of the Indications of bad faith:
faithfully executed. former for his own - where there is a significant increase in the number
- different from supervision (merely overseeing or the power of positions in the new staffing pattern of the
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
- President has the authority to go over, or authority to see that subordinate officers are performing department or agency concerned
confirm, modify, or reverse the action taken by their duties) - where an office is abolished and another is
his department secretaries - has the power to delagate additional duties to cabinet performing substantially the same functions is
members or other subordinate executive officers created
Take Care Clause - where incumbents are replaced by those less
- power to take care (or to investigate) that laws - includes the authority to reorganize the Executive qualified in terms of status of appointment,
are faithfully executed department (agencies and offices) performance, and merit
- until a law is declared unconstitutional, the - an exercise of his residual powers - where there is a classification of offices in the
President has a duty to execute it regardless - President is granted broad organization powers to department or agency concerned and the
of his doubts on its validity implement reorganization measures reclassified offices perform substantially the same
- with this power is the power to conduct - President has the continuing authority to group, consolidate functions as the original offices
investigations into conduct of officials and bureaus and agencies, to abolish offices, and to transfer - where the removal violates the order of separation
employees in the executive department functions, to create and classify functions, services and - The power of the President to reorganize offices
- power to prosecute violators of penal laws activities, and to standardize salaries and materials outside his office is limited to merely transferring
(DOJ) - done in order to achieve simplicity and economy functions or agencies from the OP to
Departments/agencies or vice president
Sec 31 of the Revised Admin code authorizes the President:
a. to restructure the internal organization of the Office of
the President by abolishing, consolidating, or merging
units thereof or transferring functions from one unit to
another
b. transfer functions or offices fro the Office of the
President to any other department or agency in the
executive branch and vice versa
Power of general Article X, Section 4 - President can only interfere with the affairs and activities of
supervision over The President exercises only the power of an LGU if he or she finds that it had acted in a manner
local general supervision over local governments contrary to law
governments
Military powers Article VII, Section 18. (Limitation on Military Commander-in-chief Power to Organize Court Martials
Powers) - The ability of the President to require a military official to - military tribunals cannot try civilians when civil
The President shall be the Commander-in-Chief secure prior consent before appearing in Congress pertains to courts are open and functioning
of all armed forces of the Philippines and awholly different and independent specie of presidential - members of PNP are not w/in jurisdiction of
whenever it becomes necessary, he may call authority — the Commander-in-Chief powers of the military court
out such armed forces to prevent or suppress President. By tradition and jurisprudence, these commander- - military courts take cognizance of service
lawless violence, invasion or rebellion. In case in- chief powers are not encumbered by the same degree connected offenses or crimes under the Articles of
of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety of restriction as that which may attach to executive War
requires it, he may, for a period not exceeding privilege or executive control.
sixty days, suspend the privilege of the writ of - may validly prohibit a military officer from testifying in a Power to conduct peace negotiations
habeas corpus or place the Philippines or any legislative inquiry, w/o prejudice to legislative power to inquiry
part thereof under martial law. Within forty-eight - The vitality, of the tenet that the President is the commander- Doctrine of command responsibility
hours from the proclamation of martial law or in-chief of the AFP is most crucial to the democratic way of life, - can be held responsibility for EJKs and enforced
the suspension of the privilege of the writ of to civil supremacy over the military, and to the general stability disappearances
habeas corpus, the President shall submit a of our representative system of government.
report in person or in writing to the Congress. - court martials are agencies of executive character not judicial
The Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at courts, hence, subject to the President
least a majority of all its Members in regular or
special session, may revoke such proclamation Calling-out Power
or suspension, which revocation shall not be set - Under the calling-out power, the President may summon the
aside by the President. Upon the initiative of the armed forces to aid her in suppressing lawless violence,
President, the Congress may, in the same invasion or rebellion; this involves ordinary police action. But
manner, extend such proclamation or every act that goes beyond the President’s calling-out power is
suspension for a period to be determined by the considered illegal or ultra vires. For this reason, a President
Congress, if the invasion or rebellion shall must be careful in the exercise of her powers. She cannot
persist and public safety requires it. invoke a greater power (suspension of writ) when she wishes
to act under a lesser power (call out)
The Congress, if not in session, shall, within - It when the President calls out the armed forces to suppress
twenty-four hours following such proclamation lawless violence, rebellion or invasion, he necessarily
or suspension, convene in accordance with its exercises a discretionary power solely vested in his
rules without need of a call. wisdom. The Court cannot overrule the President’s
discretion or substitute its own.
The Supreme Court may review, in an - The only criterion is that “whenever it becomes
appropriate proceeding filed by any citizen, the necessary”, the President may call out the armed
sufficiency of the factual basis of the forces. In the exercise of the power, on-the-spot
proclamation of martial law or the suspension of decisions may be necessary in emergency situations
the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus or the to avert great loss of human lives and mass
extension thereof, and must promulgate its destruction of property. Indeed, the decision to call
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
decision thereon within thirty days from its filing. out the armed forces must be done swiftly and
decisively if it were to have any effect at all.
A state of martial law does not suspend the - President does not have the authority to promulgate
operation of the Constitution, nor supplant the “decrees” because that is legislative power
functioning of the civil courts or legislative - the President has discretionary authority to declare a “state
assemblies, nor authorize the conferment of of rebellion”. The Court may only look into the sufficiency of
jurisdiction on military courts and agencies over the factual basis for the exercise of the power.
civilians where civil courts are able to function, - a mere declaration of a state of rebellion cannot
nor automatically suspend the privilege of the diminish or violate constitutionally protected
writ of habeas corpus. rights. There is also no basis for the apprehensions
that, because of the declaration, military and police
The suspension of the privilege of the writ of authorities may resort to warrantless arrests. As held
habeas corpus shall apply only to persons in Lacson v. Perez, supra., the authorities may only
judicially charged for rebellion or offenses resort to warrantless arrests of persons suspected of
inherent in, or directly connected with, invasion. rebellion as provided under Sec. 5, Rule 113 of the
Rules of Court.
During the suspension of the privilege of the - exercised only by the President and may not be exercised by
writ of habeas corpus, any person thus arrested local executive officials or anyone else
or detained shall be judicially charged within
three days, otherwise he shall be released.
Martial Law
- Willoughby: military have been called upon by the executive
to assist him in the maintenance of law and order and that
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
will the emergency still exist, they must, upon pain of arrest
and punishment, not commit any act which will in any way
render difficult the restoration of order and the enforcement
of law.
- no new powers are given to the executive; no extension of
arbitrary authority is recognized; no civil rights of the
individuals are suspended
Pardoning Power Article VII, Section 19 Pardon. An act of grace which exempts the individual on Limitations on exercise:
whom it is bestowed from the punishment that the law inflicts i) Cannot be granted in cases of
Except in cases of impeachment, or as for the crime he has committed. impeachment [Sec. 19, Art. VII].
otherwise provided in the Constitution, the
President may grant reprieves, commutations, Commutation. Reduction or mitigation of the penalty. ii) Cannot be granted in cases of violation of
and pardons, and remit fines and forfeitures, Reprieve. Postponement of a sentence or stay of execution. election laws without the favorable
after conviction by final judgment. He shall also Parole. Release from imprisonment, but without full restoration recommendation of the Commission
have the power to grant amnesty with the of liberty, as parolee is still in the custody of the law on Elections [Sec. 5, Art. IX-C].
concurrence of a majority of all the members of although not in confinement.
the Congress iii) Can be granted only after conviction
Amnesty. Act of grace, concurred in by the legislature, usually by final judgment.
Executive Clemency – granted for the purpose extended to groups of persons who committed political
of relieving the harshness of the law or offenses, which puts into oblivion the offense itself. iv) Cannot be granted in cases of
correcting mistakes in the administration of legislative contempt (as it would
justice Pardon Discretionary; may not be controlled by the violate separation of powers), or civil
legislature or reversed by the courts, unless there is a contempt (as the State is without
constitutional violation. Thus, it was a legal malapropism for interest in the same)
the trial court to interject par. 2, Art. 135, Revised Penal Code,
recommending the grant of pardon after the convict shall have v) Cannot absolve the convict of civil
served a jail term of 5 years, considering that this was a liability.
prosecution under a special law, and that the matter of a
pardon is within the President’s exclusive prerogative
vi) Cannot restore public offices forfeited
Classifications of Pardon
Plenary or partial
(a) Plenary - Extinguishes all the penalties imposed upon the
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
AMNESTY PARDON
addressed to political infractions of peace of the
offenses state
classes of persons individuals
no need for distinct acts of acceptance necessary
acceptance
requires concurrence of does not
Congress
a public act which the courts private act which must be
may take judicial notice of pleaded and proved
looks backward and puts looks forward and relieves
into oblivion the offense the pardonee of the
itself consequences of the
offense
Diplomatic Power Article VII, Section 21 Business of Foreign Relations Treaty-making power is exclusive to the President.
- deal with foreign states Congress may not interfere in the field of treaty
No treaty or international agreement shall be - extend or withhold recognition negotiations.
valid and effective unless concurred in by at - maintain diplomatic relations
least 2/3 of all the members of the Senate. - enter into treaties Concurrence of Senate pertains only to the validity
- appoint ambassadors, consuls, public ministers of the treaty not conduct of negotiations.
JUDICIAL BRANCH
JUDICIAL POWER
CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS:
- includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies
1. The Supreme Court is a constitutional body; it may not be abolished by
involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to
the legislature.
determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion
2. The members of the Supreme Court are removable only by impeachment.
amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or
3. The Supreme Court may not be deprived of its minimum original and
instrumentality of the Government [Sec. 1, par. 2, Art. VIII].
appellate jurisdiction; appellate jurisdiction may not be increased without
- Where is it vested: one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may
its advice and concurrence.
be established by law [Sec. 1, Art. VIII].
4. The Supreme Court has administrative supervision over all inferior courts
and personnel.
5. The Supreme Court has the exclusive power to discipline judges/ justices Inherent powers
of inferior courts.
6. The members of the Judiciary have security of tenure. to amend and control its processes and orders to as to make them
7. The members of the Judiciary may not be designated to any agency conformable with law and justice includes the right to reverse itself,
performing quasi-judicial or administrative functions. especially when, in its honest opinion, it has committed an error or
8. Salaries of judges may not be reduced; the Judiciary enjoys fiscal mistake in judgment, and that to adhere to its decision will cause injustice
autonomy to a party litigant [Tocao v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127405,
a. guarantee of full flexibility to allocate and utilize their resources September 20, 2001].
with the wisdom and dispatch that their needs require. It precluded from examining its own ruling and rectifying errors of judgment
recognizes the power and authority to levy, assess and collect if blind and stubborn adherence to res judicata would involve the sacrifice
fees, fix rates of compensation not exceeding the highest rates of justice to technicality [De Leon v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127182,
authorized by law for compensation and pay plans of the December 5, 2001].
government and allocate and disburse such sums as may be
provided by law or prescribed by them in the course of the Jurisdiction - power to hear and decide a case.
discharge of their functions
b. -In downgrading the positions and salary grades of two positions ORIGINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
in the Philippine Judicial Academy, the DBM overstepped its JURISDICTION
authority and encroached upon the fiscal autonomy of the Limitation Congress shall have No law shall be passed increasing
Supreme Court and its power of supervision over court the power to define, the appellate jurisdiction of the
prescribe and Supreme Court as provided in the
personnel, as enshrined in the Constitution. apportion the Constitution without its advice and
9. The Supreme Court, alone, may initiate and promulgate the Rules of jurisdiction of the concurrence [Sec. 30, Art. VI].
Court. various courts, but
10. The Supreme Court, alone, may order temporary detail of judges. may not deprive the
11. The Supreme Court can appoint all officials and employees of the Supreme Court of its
Judiciary. jurisdiction over
cases enumerated in
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
IMPEACHMENT
DEFINITION AND OTHER NOTES IMPEACHABLE OFFICERS GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT PROCEDURE
Definition 1. President 1. Culpable violation of the Constitution 1. The House of Representatives shall have the
- a criminal proceeding 2. Vice President 2. Treason exclusive power to initiate all cases of
against a public officer, 3. Chief Justice and Associate 3. Bribery impeachment
before a quasi-judicial Justices of the Supreme Court 4. graft and corruption 2. A verified complaint for impeachment may be
political court, instituted by Justices of 5. other high crimes filed by any Member of the House of
written accusation called Sandiganbayan 6. betrayal of the public trust. Representatives or by any citizen upon a
‘articles of impeachment 4. Chairmen and Members of the resolution of endorsement by any member
- a national inquest into the Constitutional Commissions Culpable violation of the Constitution – thereof
conduct of public men CSC, COA, wrongful, intentional or wilful disregard or flouting 3. Included in the Order of Business within 10
- power of Congress to COMELEC of the fundamental law. Act must be deliberate session days, and referred to the proper
remove a public official for 5. Ombudsman and motivated by bad faith Committee within 3 session days.
serious crimes or If the verified complaint is filed by at
misconduct as provided in - list is exclusive; may not be Treason – committed by a person who, owing least one-third of all the members of
the Constitution reduced or increased by allegiance to the Government of the Philippines, the House, the same shall constitute
legislative enactment levies war against it or adheres to its enemies, the Articles of Impeachment, and trial
Notes: - Special Prosecutor cannot giving them aid and comfort by the Senate shall forthwith proceed.
- impeachment case is conduct an investigation into [There is no need to refer the same to
deemed initiated when the alleged misconduct of a Bribery – acts or omissions in connection with the proper Committee.]
complaint (with the Supreme Court justice, with official duties in consideration of any offer, 4. The Committee, after hearing, and by a majority
accompanying resolution of the end in view of filing a promise, gift or present received by him vote of all its members, shall submit its report to
indorsement) has been filed criminal information against the House within 60 session days from such
with the House of him with the Sandiganbayan, Other high crimes – serious and enormous a referral, together with the corresponding
Representatives and as this would violate the nature to strike at the very life or the orderly resolution.
referred to the appropriate security of tenure of Supreme workings of the government 5. A vote of at least 1/3 of all the members of the
Committee Court justices. House shall be necessary either to affirm a
- an impeachment complaint - an impeachable officer who is Betrayal of public trust - ex. Negligence of favorable resolution with the Articles of
need not allege only one a member of the Philippine Bar duty, tyrannical abuse of authority, Impeachment of the Committee, or override its
impeachable offense; cannot be disbarred without malfeasance/misfeasance, favoritisim, contrary resolution. The vote of each member
multiple complaints may be first being impeached obstruction of justice shall be recorded
considered 6. No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated
- Rules of Court are not - list is exclusive; may not be reduced or against the same official more than once within
applicable to impeachment increased by legislative enactment a period of one year
cases because Senate is not - The acts which are impeachable 7. The Senate shall have the sole power to try
a court of Justice grounds must be committed in the and decide all cases of impeachment. When
- Congress shall promulgate performance of the official’s public sitting for that purpose, the Senators shall be on
its own rules; such rules office. oath or affirmation. When the President of the
need not be published in the Philippines is on trial, the Chief Justice of the
Official Gazette Supreme Court shall preside, but shall not vote.
- Issue on what is an A decision of conviction must be concurred in by
impeachable offense is at least two-thirds of all the members of the
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
purely political Senate.
- Impeachment proceeding is 8. Impeachment shall not extend further than
not judicial but political Removal from office and disqualification to hold
exercise any office under the Republic of the Philippines.
- HOR determines the But the party convicted shall be liable and
standard as to form and subject to prosecution, trial and punishment
substance of impeachment according to law.
complaint 9. Congress shall promulgate its rules on
impeachment to effectively carry out the
Judicial Review purpose.
Justiciable issues on impeachment
proceedings:
- manner of filing
a. verified complaint by any
Member of the House
b. by any citizen upon a
resolution of endorsement by
any member thereof
c. filed by at least one-third of all
the members of the House
- required vote to impeach
- limitation on initiating of
impeachment case (one year
bar)
OTHERS
Ill-gotten Wealth Restriction on Loans Statement of assets, liabilities and net Allegiance to the State and to the
The right of the State to recover worth Constitution
properties unlawfully acquired by No loan, guaranty, or other form of financial
public officials or employees, from accommodation for any business purpose A public officer or employee shall, upon Public officers and employees owe the
them or from their nominees or may be granted, directly or indirectly, by any assumption of office and as often thereafter State and this Constitution allegiance at
transferees, shall not be barred by government-owned or controlled bank or as may be required by law, submit a all times, and any public officer or
prescription, laches or estoppels. financial institution to the President, Vice declaration under oath of his assets, employee who seeks to change his
This provision applies only to civil President, the Members of the Cabinet, the liabilities and net worth. In the case of the citizenship or acquire the status of an
actions for recovery of ill-gotten Congress, the Supreme Court, and the President, the Vice President, the Members immigrant of another country during his
wealth and not to criminal cases. Constitutional Commissions, the of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme tenure shall be dealt with by law.
Thus, prosecution of offenses Ombudsman, or to any firm or entity in which Court, the Constitutional Commissions and
relating, or incident to, or involving they have controlling interest, during their other constitutional offices, and officers of
ill-gotten wealth in the said provision tenure. the armed forces of general or flag rank, the
may be barred by prescription declaration shall be disclosed to the public
Prescription period for ill-gotten in the manner provided by law.
wealth during Marcos regime – will
run after EDSA
Constitutional Law I Mary Evielyn N. Mateo
Atty. Antonio Nachura, Jr. San Beda Law
Appointment
Appointed by the President
Term of Office
seven (7) years without
reappointment
Subject to removal by the
President