Vera Fra Usa U20

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

(FRA) FRANCE

1:1

UNITED STATES (USA)

Group A, 24 June 2013, 17:00 CET Istanbul (TUR) Match Officials Referee Assistant Referee 1 Assistant Referee 2 Fourth Official FIFA Referee Assessor Blog Referee Observer
1 2 3

Name Carlos Vera Christian Lescano Byron Romero Cneyt akr Carlos Alarcn Chefren

ORI ECU ECU ECU TUR PAR ITA

Mark1 8.6 8.5 8.3 8.3

Mark2 ---------

Difficulty3 Very Challenging Challenging Normal Normal

Final mark according to evaluation scale. Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred). Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of difficulty are: normal, challenging and very challenging. 4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.

Evaluation scale
(for referee, ARs and fourth official)

Description of the Marks Excellent. Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken. Good. Expected level. Satisfactory with small areas for improvement. Satisfactory with important areas for improvement. One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above. One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 8.2. Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for improvement. Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important mistakes. Unacceptable.

9.0 10.0 8.5 8.9 8.3 8.4 8.2 8.0 8.1 7.9 7.8 7.5 7.7 7.0 7.4 6.0 6.9

Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.): Matchday 2 of Group A in the FIFA U-20 World Cup, played in Istanbul at Al Sami Yen Arena, between France and USA. France had the chance to qualify in case of a victory (after having defeated Ghana in the first match) while USA were in danger of elimination, having lost the first match against Spain. Referee appointed by FIFA was Carlos Vera of Ecuador. The match in its progress presented several challenging situations for the referee, therefore it was quite difficult.

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Referee
Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.) Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the referees decision Contact in penalty area between Umtiti (FRA) and Rodriguez (USA). The referee 23 lets the game flow, acceptable decision. The defender made a very risky action from behind, trying anyway to hit the ball. Complaints by USA for a possible handball in penalty area but the decision of the 45+1 referee is correct. No foul. A penalty is whistled in favor of France for a clear foul by Torre (USA) on 48 Foulquier (FRA). The contact seems to happen exactly on the line, so the penalty is justified. Penalty given in favor of USA. Contact in area between Lemina (FRA) and 65 Rodriguez (USA). The contact appears minimal but still no mistake, the call is acceptable. Penalty appeal by USA. Contact between Digne (FRA) and Yedlin (USA). The 79 referee lets the game flow. Dangerous action by defender, but still not clear penalty.

Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight the referees tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teams and players, teamwork etc.). Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences! Positive Points The referee showed alertness when he whistled the first penalty of the match, it 1. was not easy to understand whether the foul happened inside or outside area but at the end he took the correct decision. 2. Knowledge of the LOTG, giving YC in mandatory situations. In second half the match became more intensive and Vera for this reason 3. changed his approach and style, recognizing the increasing difficulty. The decisions made by Vera, in a so difficult match, were accepted without big 4. complaints by players. The match appeared always under control. 5. Teamwork: assistants helped the referee in detecting some fouls. 6. Advantage rule: a player was booked after having given an advantage.

Points for Improvement Management of free kicks while using the spray. In the first half (9) he had 1. problems and much time was wasted prior to resume the game. 2. A YC might have been given when the penalty for USA was whistled. 3. He applied the advantage without making a clear gesture (79).

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

The referees character Physical Aspects Fitness / Stamina Always close to play without interfering with it Flexible diagonal movement Positioning at set pieces Efficient positioning, having a good angle of vision to play Close to the penalty area, if needed Tactical Approach Description Yes Consistency in the tactical approach / style The tactical approach suited to the requirements of the match / the match benefitted from the tactical approach of the referee Ability to adapt the tactical approach if needed very lenient lenient medium X X strict X So-so X X X No very strict + Expected X X X X -

Further observations (peculiarities of the referee revealing his character) The referee was forced to have a strict approach in second half because the match became intensive and the players knew that it was a crucial game to win. For this reason, the cards were issued with more frequency by Vera. We must underline also that he was ready when crucial decisions had to be taken.

Unofficial Referee Observers Report

rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Assistant Referee 1
Please assess the first assistant referees performance. Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour 45 60 80 Sanogo (FRA) is flagged offside. Correct and difficult decision. A gol scored by USA is disallowed for offside. Correct, crucial and difficult decision. Rodriguez (USA) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

Assistant Referee 2
Please assess the second assistant referees performance. Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour 26 Gil (USA) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

Fourth Official
Please assess the fourth officials performance. Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth officials behaviour All match akr performed well his duties as fourth official, nothing relevant to report. long

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy