MIT18 100CF12 Prob Set 3
MIT18 100CF12 Prob Set 3
1
We have a metric space (X, d), and dene the function d' (x, y ) = d(x, y ). We wish to show that (X, d' ) is also a metric space with the same open sets as (X, d). We rst check that d' is a metric. (a) If x = y , then d' (x, y ) = larly d' (x, x) = 0. (b) d' (x, y ) = d(x, y ) = d(x, y ) > 0 since d(x, y ) > 0, and simi
(c) For the triangle inequality, we rst need the following elementary Fact: If a, b 0, then a+b a+ b.
Indeed, squaring the right hand side gives a + b + 2 ab a + b, and the square root function is order preserving. Using this fact, for x, y, z X we have d' (x, z ) = d(x, z ) d(x, y ) + d(y, z ) d(x, y )+ d(y, z ) = d' (x, y )+d' (y, z )
Now, let E be an open set for E . We need to show that it is open for d' . Let x E . Then there is some r > 0 such that the ball of radius r around x is contained in E , where the ball is taken with respect to d, i.e. Nr (x) E . But the ball of radius r with respect to d is the ball of radius r with respect to d' , so there is a neighbourhood of x with respect to d' contained in E . In other words, E is open with respect to d' . Similarly, a set that is open with respect to d' is also open with respect to d. 1
2
We prove the result for Rn . Lemma: Qn is dense in Rn . Proof: Just use the density of Q in R for each coordinate. Theorem: Let n N and let S Rn be a set such that every point in S is isolated. Then S is at most countable. Proof: Fix s S . Since s is an isolated point, there exists an r s > 0 such that Nr s /2 and pick an element ts Nrs (s) Qn . s (s) S = {s}; let rs = r Doing this for each s denes a function f : S Qn , s ts . We now go about showing that f is injective; since Qn is countable this will show S is at most countable. Suppose f (s) = f ( s) and let t = f (s). Then t = ts = ts s). Nrs (s) Nrs ( Thus s , r s d(s, s ) d(t, s) + d(t, s ) < rs + rs max{r } s) or s Nr . so either s Nr s s (s). In either case we obtain s = s (
3
X is a space where every innite subset has a limit point. We rst prove the following Lemma 1: Let > 0. Then there exists a nite set N with the follow ing properties: (a) For every x, y N , x = y , d(x, y ) 0. (b) For every z X , there exists a y N such that d(z, y ) < . Fix > 0. We construct N inductively. Pick an arbitrary x1 X . Assume we have x1 , x2 . . . xm with d(xi , xj ) for i = j . If every point of X is within of {x1 , . . . xm }, then we can take N = {x1 , . . . xm } which satises (a) and (b) of the lemma. If not, we choose xm+1 such that d(xm+1 , xi ) for 1 i m.
We claim that this process must terminate at some nite M , at which point we are done. If not, then by this process we have constructed an innite set C = {x1 , x2 , x3 . . .} with d(xi , xj ) for i = j . By our assumption on X , this set has a limit point x. Now consider the open neighbourhood N/4 (x). This must contain two distinct points xi = xj = x (in fact, innitely many points, by Theorem 2.20.) Using the triangle inequality, we have d(xi , xj ) d(xi , x) + d(x, xj ) < /4 + /4 = /2 A contradiction. Using the above Lemma, for each m N, we have a nite set N1/m such that every point of X is within 1/m of some point of N1/m . Let D = m N1/m . D is a countable union of nite sets, and hence is countable. We claim that D is dense. Take any x X , and r > 0. Pick an m suciently large that 1/m < r. Then by denition there is a y N1/m D such that d(x, y ) < 1/m. But then y Nr (x). Since x and r are arbitrary, this proves that D is dense.
4
Let A = {p R|p = d(x, f (x) for some x X }. Since distances are non negative A is bounded below by 0. Let a = inf A. Obviously a 0. We make the following claim, which we will prove later Claim: There exists x X such that d(x, f (x)) = a. In other words, the inmum is actually attained in A. Now, assuming the claim, if a = 0, then we are done, since 0 = d(x, f (x)) so x = f (x) is a xed point. So suppose a > 0. Then x = f (x). Set y = f (x). Then we have d(y, f (y )) A, and d(y, f (y )) = d(f (x), f (y )) < d(x, y ) = d(x, f (x)) = a
Which is a contradiction, since a is a lower bound for A. So a = 0 and we are done. Proof of the claim: suppose the claim is false. Dene the set Un = {x 3
X |d(x, f (x)) > a +1/n}. We claim that the sets Un cover X . For any x X , since the inf is not attained, we must have d(x, f (x)) = a + r where r > 0. Take n N suciently large that r > 1/n. Then d(x, f (x)) > a + 1/n, so x Un and the Un s cover X . We claim that Un is open. To see this, let x Un . Then d(x, f (x) > a + 1/n. Choose a small E > 0 such that E < (d(x, f (x)) a 1/n)/2; then d(x, f (x)) 2E > a + 1/n. Then we have NE (x) Un . To see this, let y NE (x). Note that d(f (x), f (y )) < d(x, y ) < E since f is contracting. Then using the triangle inequality twice, we have
d(x, f (x)) d(x, y )+d(y, f (x)) d(x, y )+d(y, f (y ))+d(f (y ), f (x)) < E+d(y, f (y ))+E
So y Un . Thus we have showed that every point of Un has a neighbour hood contained entirely in Un , so Un is open. In other words, we have constructed an open cover {Un } of X . Since X is compact, this cover has a nite subcover {Un1 , . . . Unm }; assume we have labelled these such that ni < nj for i < j . Note that the Un are increasing, i.e. Um Un if m < n. Thus Uni Unm , and so {Unm } also covers X , i.e. X = Unm . But then for all x X , we have d(x, f (x)) > a + 1/nm by the denition of Unm . Thus a + 1/nm is a lower bound for A strictly larger than a, which contradicts the fact that a = inf A. This proves the claim, and hence the result.
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.