Mid-Term Exam: Geometry/Topology I

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Mid-Term Exam

Geometry/Topology I Solution Hints


Do any four of the following problems. 25 points each. 1. Let (X, d) be a connected metric space containing more than one point. Prove that X is uncountable. Let x and y be two distinct points of X, and set D = d(x, y) > 0. Let f : X R be the continuous function dened by f (z) = d(x, z). Since X is connected, f (X) is connected, too. Hence [0, D] f (X). Thus f (X) is uncountable. Hence X must be uncountable, too. 2. Let f : X Y be an injective continuous map between topological spaces. If X is compact and Y is Hausdor, prove that X is homeomorphic to f (X) Y . The key point is that f is a closed map. To see this, suppose that A X is closed. Since X is compact, it follows that A is also compact. Hence f (A) is compact. Since Y is Hausdor, this implies that f (A) Y is closed. Moreover, f (A) f (X) is closed in the subspace topology. The induced map X f (X) is therefore a closed, continuous bijection, and so is a homeomorphism. 3. Let Rn be given its usual Euclidean metric d and its usual topology. If A Rn is a non-empty closed set, and if x Rn is any given point, prove that there is a point y A of minimum distance from x. In other words, show that y A such that d(x, z) d(x, y) z A. Extra credit for pointing out the omitted hypothesis! 1

Given some w A, let R = d(x, w), and observe that C = A BR (x) Rn is closed and bounded. Thus C is compact by the Heine-Borel theorem, and it is also non-empty, since w C. The continuous function f : C R dened by f (z) = d(x, z) therefore achieves its minimum value at some y C A, and this is the desired closest point. 4. Let X be a compact topological space, and let A1 A2 Aj be a nested sequence of closed, non-empty subsets of X. Prove that Aj = . j=1 Suppose not. Then the open sets Uj = X Aj cover X. Since X is compact, only nitely many are needed, so X = U1 Un for some n. But since Uj Uj+1 , this implies that X = Un . However, X Un = An = , so this is a contradiction. 5. Let U R be an open set. Prove that U is a countable union of disjoint open intervals. (Hint: put o the issue of countability until the very end.) Let I U , J, be the connected components of U . Then each I is open in U , because U is locally (path) connected. Since U is open in R, this means that each I is a connected open subset of R, and so is an open interval. Thus, U = J I is a disjoint union of open intervals. To show that the index set J must be countable, now observe that each I must meet the rationals Q, since Q R is dense. Choose one rational number q from each I . Since the intervals I are disjoint, the numbers q are all dierent, and the function J Q given by q is therefore injective. Thus J is bijectively equivalent to a subset of a countable set, and is therefore countable. 6. Let X and Y be topological spaces, and assume that Y is Hausdor. Let f, g : X Y be two continuous functions. Prove that {x X | f (x) = g(x)} is a closed subset of X. Set A = {x X | f (x) = g(x)} X. Method #1 (Elementary). Suppose x A. Then f (x) = g(x). Since Y is Hausdor, U, V Y disjoint open sets with f (x) U , g(x) V . Set W = f 1 (U ) g 1 (V ). Then W is open, with x W (X A). Hence X A is open, and A is therefore closed. 2

Method #2 (Sophisticated). Let Y Y be the diagonal {(y, y) | y Y }. Since Y is Hausdor, is closed. However, f g : X Y Y is continuous. Thus A = (f g)1 () is also closed, exactly as claimed. 7. Let X be a compact Hausdor space. Prove that X is normal (T4 ). See Munkres, page 202. 8. Let X and Y be regular (T3 ) topological spaces. Prove that X Y is regular, too. (Hint: recall that the T3 axiom can be reformulated in terms of open sets.) If W X Y is open, and if (x, y) W is any point, we need to show that (x, y) has an open neighborhood U with U W . However, any such W is a union of basis open sets. So there exist open sets W1 X and W2 Y with (x, y) W1 W2 W . But since X is regular, we can nd open neighborhoods V1 of x and V2 of y such that V j Wj , j = 1, 2. Moreover, V 1 V 2 is closed in X Y , since its complement [(X V 1 )Y ][X (Y V 2 )] is open. Hence (x, y) V1 V2 V1 V2 V 1 V 2 W1 W2 W and so U = V1 V2 fullls our requirement, and X Y is regular, as claimed. Remark. In fact, V1 V2 = V 1 V 2 , but you do not need this here. 9. Let (X, d) be a metric space, and let A and B be disjoint closed sets. Using d, construct an explicit continuous function f : X [0, 1] such that A = f 1 (0) and B = f 1 (1). Then relate and compare this to the Urysohn lemma. One such function is dA (x) dA (x) + dB (X) where dA (x) = inf{d(x, y) | y A} and dB (x) = inf{d(x, y) | y B}. In par1 3 ticular, X is T4 , since U = f 1 ((, 4 )) and V = f 1 (( 4 , )) are disjoint open sets which contain A and B, respectively. However, the constructed f is better than the one promised by the Urysohn Lemma for an arbitrary T4 space, since we actually have A = f 1 (0) and B = f 1 (1), rather than just A f 1 (0) and B f 1 (1). f (x) = 3

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy