Product Concept Evaluation System/overview: New Product Development 23C79000, 24.9.2013 Prof. Jaakko Aspara
Product Concept Evaluation System/overview: New Product Development 23C79000, 24.9.2013 Prof. Jaakko Aspara
Product Concept Evaluation System/overview: New Product Development 23C79000, 24.9.2013 Prof. Jaakko Aspara
OUTCOMES
Some broad opportunity areas and strategic direction for NPD (including broad market/use context targeted) 2. Concept a) User generation problem identification b) Studying other info and product idea sources c) Product concepting 3. Concept evaluation a) Initial concept evaluations/ testing
Multiple user problems identified (within selected market/use context) Relevant user problems selected
Best product concepts selected for full screen (least feasible eliminated) b) Full screen (and sales/ financial forecasting) Best product concepts selected for actual development (least feasible eliminated) 4. Actual /detailed development 5. Launch (of the new product[s] to the market
2013-09-24
Evaluations?
Evaluation = Is (idea) X good or bad? How good or bad (an idea) X is? Especially: How feasible is X (a) commercially and (b) technically? It is worth noting that evaluations happen throughout the process of new product development.
In the (1) opportunity identification stage, the selection of opportunity areas on which to focus requires at least some evaluation of various opportunities that exist. In (2) product concept ideation/generation, ideation always involves some simultaneous evaluation (even just knowing that now I have an idea means that you have already evaluated the idea at least a bit) In (4) actual development and launch stages you may evaluate different alternative designs for the product and alternative launch plans and strategies.
The concept evaluation system refers to the various evaluation tasks and techniques undertaken throughout the whole product development process.C
2013-09-24
Agenda
1. Overview of Concept Evaluation System
i.e., some evaluation considerations that are relevant to all the stages of the product development process
2013-09-24
Figure 8.1
8-7
A. Product would fail if brought to market B. Product would succeed if brought to market
AB
BB
Cells AA and BB are correct decisions. Cells BA and AB are errors, but they have different cost and probability dimensions.
8-8
2013-09-24
8-9
Key: new product participants should avoid to black-and-white "good/bad" mindsets, avoid premature closure
8-10
2013-09-24
Potholes
Know what the really damaging problems or critical drivers are for your firm and focus on them when evaluating concepts. Example: Campbell Soup focuses on:
1. Manufacturing Cost 2. Taste
8-11
People
Proposal may be hard to stop once there is buy-in on the concept. Need tough demanding hurdles, especially late in new products process. Personal risk associated with new product development. Need system that protects developers and offers reassurance (if warranted).
Failing sometimes should be considered OK. (Otherwise people just make safe decisions and concepts of low innovativeness).
8-12
2013-09-24
Surrogates
Surrogate questions can give clues to the real answer (before/when we cannot yet know the real answer).
Real Question Surrogate Question Will customers prefer it? Did they keep the prototype product we gave them after the concept test? Will cost be competitive? Will competition leap in? Will it sell? Does it match our manufacturing skills? What did they do last time? Did it do well in field testing?
8-13
2013-09-24
Agenda
1. Overview of Concept Evaluation System
i.e., some evaluation considerations that are relevant to all the stages of the product development process
OUTCOMES
Some broad opportunity areas and strategic direction for NPD (including broad market/use context targeted) 2. Concept a) User generation problem identification b) Studying other info and product idea sources c) Product concepting 3. Concept evaluation a) Initial concept evaluations/ testing
Multiple user problems identified (within selected market/use context) Relevant user problems selected
Best product concepts selected for full screen (least feasible eliminated) b) Full screen (and sales/ financial forecasting) Best product concepts selected for actual development (least feasible eliminated) 4. Actual /detailed development 5. Launch (of the new product[s] to the market
2013-09-24
Figure III.1
8-17
9-18
2013-09-24
Select respondent type(s) Select response situation Define the interview Conduct trial interviews Interview, tabulate, analyze
9-19
10
2013-09-24
Interviewing sequence: Believable? Important? Interesting? Would it work? What problems do they see? Would they buy? Test procedure, change and implement, study findings.
9-21
Figure 9.2
9-22
11
2013-09-24
Figure 9.3
It is often worthwhile to define the segments before the concept tests and target users from the right segment. Alternatively, the results from the concept test (i.e. differing evaluations by different kinds of users) can also be used to identify different segments.
x x x x x x Segment 1 x x x xx x x x Fashion x
9-23
If the concept involves new art and entertainment. If the concept embodies such a radically new technology that users have very hard time imagining. If customers simply do not know what problems they have.
9-24
12