Heat Exchanger Design
Heat Exchanger Design
Heat Exchanger Design
The Exchanger
Benzene 180 F 7500 lb/h Water: 70F 5 ft/s The Design Equation for a Heat Exchanger Q H = UA T 2 T 1 ln T 2 T 1 = UAT lm
100F
Problem Find the Required Length of a Heat Exchanger with Specified Flows: Turbulent Flow in Both Streams The design constraints are given in the schematic above. We show this as a countercurrent configuration, but we will examine the cocurrent case as well. The benzene flow is specified as a mass flow rate (in pound mass units), and the water flow is given as a linear velocity. Heat transfer coefficients are not provided; we will have to calculate them based on our earlier discussions and the correlations presented in earlier lectures. The inside tube is specified as "Schedule 401-14 inch steel."
Pipe "schedules" are simply agreed-upon standards for pipe construction that specify the wall thickness of the pipe. Perrys Handbook specifies the following dimensions for the inside pipe : Schedule 40 1 1/4 pipe Do = 1.66 in. = 0.138 ft. Di = 1.38 in = 0.115 ft. the outside pipe : Schedule 40 2 pipe Di = 2.07 in = 0.115 ft.
To calculate the heat exchanger area, we must find Ao = DL. We know the diameter; what is the length ? The Design Equation is
Qh = U o Ao Tln
1
1 1 + ln r o / r i + 1 Uo = r r ih k o roh o
We can write it as:
A ln r o / r i 1 1 U o Lo = + + 2k h o Ao / L h i Ai / L
= R
To evaluate the parameters of the problem, we need the physical and thermal properties and conditions for flow in the system
Tb = 140F
Cp = 0.45 BTU/lb-F C Pr = pb = 5 k b = 0.085 Btu / h ft F kb b = 0.39 cP = 0.39 1 = 8.1 x 10 6lb f s / ft 2 1000 47.88 = 2.6 X 104lbm/fts
b = 52.3 lbm/ft3
Nu =
The heat transfer area per unit length is so that the inner film resistance is :
A h i Li
= 249 (0.361)
Doi = 0.138 ft
The hydraulic diameter is
D i,o + D o,i
Given the water velocity of 5 ft/s, we can solve for the water flow rate
Wwater = 9300 lbm/h The Overall Energy balance (wCp T)benz = (wCpT)water
Solving for the outlet water temperature:
Tout = 99F
Lecture 20 ChE 333
Re
VD eq
From the Dittus-Boelter equation, the Nusselt number is given as: so that the external film coefficient, ho , is
ho = 1270 Btu/hft2F
The external area/length is so that the external film resistance is
A0 = (0.138) = 0.434 ft 2 / ft L
1
A h 0 L0
= 1270 (0.434)
= 0.00181hftF / Btu
Conduction Resistance
The last term in the equation for the overall heat transfer coefficient is
Heat Load Qh = wCpT = 7500 (0.45) (180 - 100) = 2.7 x 105 Btu/h Heating Rate/unit Length Q h UA = Tln = (R) 1 Tln = 3640 Btu / h ft L L
Given the heat load, we can calculate the length of tubing so that
5 Qh 2.7 x 10 L = = = 74 ft 3640 3640
The case we considered was countercurrent flow, but we noted in an earlier example that in co-current flow we could be more fluid. Now is the pipe longer or shorter ?
A Co-current Flow Heat Exchanger The Design Equation for a Heat Exchanger Q H = UA T 2 T 1 ln T 2 T 1 = UAT lm
The heat loads are identical, the Overall Resistances to heat transfer (UA)-1 are no different since the film coefficients do not change, but the Tlm are different.
Counter current
T1 (water) = 99 T1 (benzene) = 180 T2 (water) = 70 T2 (benzene) = 100 T1 = 81 T2 = 30 Tln = 51 L = 74
Co-current
T1 (water) = 70 T1 (benzene) = 180 T2 (water) = 99 T2 (benzene) = 100 T1 = 110 T2 = 1 Tln = 23.2 L = 163 ft
There are two observations to be made. First that the tube length required for co-current flow is more than twice as long. Secondly that the approach temperature for co-current flow becomes diminishingly small.
Questions
Question 1. To have a single concentric pipe heat exchanger 73 ft. long may be impractical. Why ? Question 2. What are the alternatives and can you make a rapid evaluation of the their requirements ? Question 3. What if we use more tubes, do I need more area ? How do I estimate the number of tubes and the required area for a single pass heat exchanger. Question 4. If we use more tubes, should we specify the tubes to be smaller. Why? How do we estimate the effect ?
Question 1.
To have a single concentric pipe heat exchanger 73 ft. long may be impractical. Why ? Where do I put a 73 ft. piece of pipe ? Can I fold it up? Can I cut it into shoter pieces and have them in parallel. ?
Question 2.
What are the alternatives and can you make a rapid evaluation of the their requirements ? One alternative is to cut the pipe into 12 equal length, place them in a header and put a shell around the bundle of tubes.
Question 3.
If we use more tubes, do I need more area ? How do I estimate the number of tubes and the required area for a single pass heat exchanger. If we use N identical tubes, Renew = Reold /N since
Re =
UD Q = 4D
Question 4.
If we use more tubes, should we specify the tubes to be smaller. Why? How do we estimate the effect ? When we introduced the use of multiple tubes, we decreased the Re to significantly reduce the internal film resistance. We can then use similar arguments in decreasing the tube diameter, but we have the following consequences 1. we reduce the area/length for heat transfer. 2. we increase the Reynolds number and the heat transfer coefficient 3. we increase the pressure drop 4. we make it harder to clean