Averting The Danger of Catastrophic Climate Change: Is The Nuclear Renaissance Essential
Averting The Danger of Catastrophic Climate Change: Is The Nuclear Renaissance Essential
Averting The Danger of Catastrophic Climate Change: Is The Nuclear Renaissance Essential
Averting the Danger of Catastrophic Climate Change: Is the Nuclear Renaissance Essential?
The WNA secretariat maintains this analysis through an on-going dialogue with the WNAs worldwide industry membership and with experts in leading energy organizations, including IEA, WEC, IAEA and OECD-NEA. The secretariat welcomes advice from all quarters as it continues to update the Outlook analysis. The latest Outlook tabulation can be seen on the WNA website.
1
~ 9150 GW (83%) ~
~1900 GW ~
(17%)
Current Nuclear Power Countries Future Nuclear Power Countries
Please consult the WNA website for the latest Outlook numbers
These aspects of the Outlook bear emphasis: The low and high global trajectories are not growth scenarios as such, but rather the boundaries of a domain of likely nuclear growth. Even the low boundary of about 2,050 GW represents more than a five-fold increase over todays nuclear capacity of 370 GW. Growth within the Outlook boundaries is postulated on the assumption that fuel availability will pose no constraint in operating a much larger global nuclear fleet. Most experts support this view on the grounds that a combination of factors new ore discoveries, advanced mining techniques, use of uranium tailings, more reprocessing, introduction of the thorium fuel cycle and, ultimately, employment of breeder reactors will ensure ample and affordable nuclear fuel supplies into the distant future. The Outlook country projections are implicitly based on the assumption of global environmental stability. This assumption will be vitiated if and as the pace of worldwide conversion to clean-energy technologies proves insufficient to avert catastrophic climate disruption. The essential goal of the Nuclear Century Outlook is to assess and demonstrate the pace of global nuclear growth necessary to prevent that outcome.
2
? ? ?
Future Transport: What will be the comparative efficacy of advanced batteries vs. hydrogen fuel cells? Clean Fossil Fuel: Will large-scale Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) prove feasible, affordable and sustainable? Renewables Technology: Can New Renewables (wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, tidal) overcome obstacles of cost and intermittency to contribute on a major scale?
Despite these technological unknowns, the essential components of a global clean-energy economy are already well understood: 1) More and Cleaner Electricity: Full transformation of electricity to emissions-free technologies Greater use of electricity in industrial processes and heating Electrification of transport (trains & battery-powered cars). 2) New Elements (using clean electricity or clean heat): High-efficiency, zero-emission plants producing a combination of heat and power (CHP) Desalination of sea water to meet an intensifying world water crisis Hydrogen production for fuel cells. Future Global Clean-Energy Need can be projected as the combined output for clean EHDH: Clean Electricity (including battery power) Clean Heating (process and factory/office/home) Clean Desalination Clean Hydrogen production.
3
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
This order-of-magnitude estimate of future Clean-Energy Need gains credence from an alternative calculation. Today the IEA judges nuclear powers 370 GW to represent 6.3% of world primary energy consumption. If so, world energy consumption equates to 5,875 Nuclear GW. If total energy consumption doubles by 2050, 85% of energy must be supplied by clean technologies in order to attain a 70% GHG cut from 2000 levels. On that basis, Clean-Energy Need in 2050 would be 9,990 Nuclear GW.
Even with roboust growth assumptions for Renewables and Clean-Fossil, the Clean-Energy Gap closes in the 21st Century only when nuclear growth rises significantly above its Low Boundary - to a capacity of about 8,000 GW.
While new countries can and should introduce nuclear energy, over 80% of nuclear growth and thus most of nuclear technologys environmental contribution will occur in nations already generating nuclear power. Even with expansive growth in nuclear power, renewables will also be needed on a large scale, despite their higher cost. In this sense, nuclear and renewables are not competitors but clean-energy partners. Conversely, even if renewable and clean-fossil technologies meet extremely optimistic assumptions, a global clean-energy revolution adequate to avert catastrophic climate change will require an enormous contribution from nuclear power and extensive realization of its worldwide growth potential.
5
The World Nuclear Association is the international private-sector organization supporting the people, technology, and enterprises that comprise the global
nuclear energy industry.
WNA members include the full range of enterprises involved in producing nuclear power from uranium miners to equipment
suppliers to generators of electricity. With a secretariat headquartered in London, the