Psychoanalysis, Its Image and Its Public - Part II
Psychoanalysis, Its Image and Its Public - Part II
Psychoanalysis, Its Image and Its Public - Part II
Propa*anda is done with the aim of !ein* conducive to certain actions from the pu!lic 9
!asically' it aims at o!tainin* a chan*e in !ehavior. 0asically' the purposes of propa*anda are
to: 1. incite to social participation and endorsement of what is !ein* advocated8 #. Producin*
stereotypicity' &. )ndicatin* the proper action to !e taen.
To these purposes' repetition is very much employed in propa*anda.
(3"2 0anguage and action
- Communication throu*h lan*ua*e is possi!le !ecause words' !oth in their present form and
throu*h their evolution' are the fruit of many other e3periences encased over the course of social
life !y people who !elon* to the same collectivity8 !ecause of this' the system of si*ns' such as it is
found !y any *roup in society' has' in its own' a normative character. )n propa*anda' as in other
forms of communication' the *roup strives to transform the *eneral lan*ua*e into a particular
lan*ua*e. This particulari:ation follows the same lines of polari:ation as the ones of the
representation and of the *lo!al situation of that *roup within society.
(:" Final observations
- a few criticisms were formulated concernin* the investi*ation on propa*anda' and it was shown
that it is essential to su!mit this phenomenon to an o!@ective study' while also tain* into account
the social conditions and the relations amon* these social conditions and the psycholo*ical and
lin*uistic content.
- there is a connection !etween representations' action modalities and lan*ua*e. On this note' the
e3amination of repetition in propa*anda allowed us to show that it is necessary to pay e=ual
attention to the co*nitive and the affective aspects8
- moreover' $oscovici showed the importance of learnin* processes' conditionin*' not in
themselves' !ut in relation to stereotypicity of the lan*ua*e.
Fifteen years later
- $oscovici says that various parties have ased him to update this chapter on the communist
partyCs anti-psychoanalytic propa*anda' !ut he refused to do this' due to the fact that it seemed to
him his analysis remained valid. Dust !ecause their aprosteriori attitude has chan*ed 9 and that they
have accepted it with considera!le delay' doesnCt mae less true that fact that' for a lon* time' they
have !een pitiless censors' and re@ected many of thr scientific innovations' such as cy!ernetics in
chemistry' cuantic physics' psychoanalysis.
- Psychoanalysis situates itself !etween science and ideolo*y 9 lie every science who was !orn in a
capitalist society' psychoanalysis cumprises a scientific nucleus and an ideolo*ical periphery. The
mar3ist analysis allows for a separation !etween the nucleus and the periphery. Psychoanalysis' as a
science' has a specific o!@ective: the unconscious' which is its point of ma3imum interest.
- a lot of the voices speain* a*ainst psychoanalyis had as a main dissatisfaction the fact that
childhood pro!lems are too emphasi:ed in e3plainin* phychic functionin*' and the essential
determinations which drive adults were mainly left out: >we donCt reproach to psychoanalysis the
fact that it doesnCt concern itself with the productive ener*ies and with production relationships'
!ecause it is not its o!@ect. What inclines us to !e a*ainst it is the fact that it presumes to e3plain
cultural facts and social movements !asin* its e3planations on the pulsions and li!idinal ener*ies'
which leads it to i*nore the very many necessary mediations in clarifyin* the pro!lems which are
situated at a specific level of human e3istence?.
- 0 $uldworf was tried to esta!lish the connection !etween pychoanalysis and mar3ism8
$%!PT&' > ) ! %ypothesis
7avin* distin*uished and descri!ed separately each system of communication 9 propa*anda'
propa*ation and diffusion 9 we need to review them from a comparative perspective. The autonomy
postulated for them is certainly not complete. Completion is not' however' everythin*. The
disctinctions we have made remain thereore valid.
- The parralel !etween these forms of communication and certain aspects of social representations'
namely those who are closely !ound up with the *eneration of !ehavior 9 opinions' attitudes and
stereotypes 9 allow us to !rin* our findin*s to*ether. $oscovici doesnCt claim that the
correspondence he is looin* for !etween communication and !ehaviour is any more than tentative'
which is not to say that it is either frivolous or ima*inary. A poet' a man who new the value of
su!@ectivity whose emer*ence scientists are so often =uic to cover up with facts and the austere
colors of laws' once said that >ima*ination is the most scientific of the faculties' !ecause it alone
understands the universal analo*y?. A metaphor is a youn* analo*y8 when it is mature' it !ecomes a
hypothesis.
- An e3amination of the similarities and differences !etween diffusion' propa*ation and propa*anda
will help to esta!lish the frame of reference we re=uire. The nature of the ordered lins !etween
messa*es provides the first dividin* line. The structure of diffusion is discontinuous and
disor*ani:ed. )n propa*anda and propa*ation' in contrast' the or*ani:ation of themes and principles
can !e descri!ed as systematic. The a!ove analyses lead us to conclude that' in propa*anda' the
systemati:ation is necessarity dichotomous.
- )n diffusion' the model 9 or in other words the set of themes and lins 9 consists of elements that
are relatively autonomous and mo!ile. The fact that they are com!ined so re*ularly !inds them
to*ether' even thou*h their contours are neither clearly defined nor e3plicitly delineated. The
conver*ence of these elements' which is random' is due to the simultaneous e3istence of a
multitude of frames of reference 9 professional' reli*ious' political and cultural.
- Propa*anda' lie propa*ation' implies models which were constructed while followin* directive
fundamental lines for *roups of people who had sufficient information. The difference !etween
them is one of de*ree. While in propa*anda the main orientations are continuously !rou*ht forth' in
propa*ation' after havin* proposed the model' it is not neccesary to refer to it every instant. %or
instance' the catholics have ela!orated a coherent vision over psychoanalysis: this vision e3ists and
has a clear influence over everythin* they pu!lish' !ut the model isnCt revealed a*ain and a*ain each
time the catholic press pu!lishes somethin* on it. The same thin* doesnCt occur in the case of the
communist press: the positions of the party are !rou*ht up a*ain and a*ain. The e3planation is
autoritharian in propa*anda' and partly persuasive in propa*ation.
- +iffusion inserts itself in a more immediate manner in the pree3istin* social institutions' and the
pu!lic it tar*ets is mo!ile.
- there is a correspondence !etween diffusion and opinion' propa*ation and attitude' and
propa*anda and stereotype.
AAN Opinions are evaluative statements a!out a controversial issue. They insta!ility' plasticity' and
specificity 9 their contradictory character 9 has !een amply proven !y !y D Stoet:el. +iffusion
doesnCt employ models that are unitary and *lo!al' !ut themes that are or*ani:ed in a non-ri*id
manner' insistin* on a certain point without incitin* to specific action. The discontinuity of themes'
the contradictions and variations which accompany them.
B The correspondence !etween attitude and propa*antion can !e seen at various levels 9 Attitudes
are psychic structures which have a ne*ative or positive orientation in relation to a *iven o!@ect.
The concept of attitude and that of structure are close. )t has a re*ulatory function. Conduct is not its
immediate or neccesary possi!ility. The creation of an attitude translated the creation of a relation
with a relevant social o!@ect.
B Stereotipicity desi*ns a simplified model of the dimensions of the stimuli' and it re=uires
immediate action. $any authors have shown there is a *reat conver*ence !etween propa*anda and
stereotypicity' since they are !oth ri*id' reductionist and authoritarian.