This document discusses challenges with cement sheaths in oil and gas wells and how failures can reduce economic value or cause total well loss. It outlines factors that can contribute to cement sheath failure at any stage, from poor slurry placement to stresses during drilling, completion, and production operations. The document focuses on flow through unset and set cement, explaining causes like gas migration through channels in the cement and potential solutions to prevent issues and design effective long-term cement sheaths.
This document discusses challenges with cement sheaths in oil and gas wells and how failures can reduce economic value or cause total well loss. It outlines factors that can contribute to cement sheath failure at any stage, from poor slurry placement to stresses during drilling, completion, and production operations. The document focuses on flow through unset and set cement, explaining causes like gas migration through channels in the cement and potential solutions to prevent issues and design effective long-term cement sheaths.
This document discusses challenges with cement sheaths in oil and gas wells and how failures can reduce economic value or cause total well loss. It outlines factors that can contribute to cement sheath failure at any stage, from poor slurry placement to stresses during drilling, completion, and production operations. The document focuses on flow through unset and set cement, explaining causes like gas migration through channels in the cement and potential solutions to prevent issues and design effective long-term cement sheaths.
This document discusses challenges with cement sheaths in oil and gas wells and how failures can reduce economic value or cause total well loss. It outlines factors that can contribute to cement sheath failure at any stage, from poor slurry placement to stresses during drilling, completion, and production operations. The document focuses on flow through unset and set cement, explaining causes like gas migration through channels in the cement and potential solutions to prevent issues and design effective long-term cement sheaths.
The well-construction process allows only one chance at designing and placing a primary cementing system. A less-than- optimal cement sheath can reduce significantly a well's economic value if it fails to prevent water from becoming part of the production stream much earlier than expected, or if it requires interrupting production altogether for costly remedial cementing treatments. In a worst-case scenario, failure of the cement sheath can cause a total loss of the well. Thus, creating a cement sheath that provides zonal isolation under any circumstance should be a primary objective in essentially every well construction project because it facilitates the production of oil and gas safely and economically over the well's lifetime. Factors that contribute to cement sheath failure can occur at any step in the well-construction process. For example, one of the earliest dangers - poor cement slurry placement - occurs if the drilling team does not remove drilling fluid or drill cuttings properly from the wellbore before pumping of the cement slurry commences. Then during the drilling phase of well construction, the cement sheath must withstand the continuous impact of the drillstring. This is particularly true in directional wells.
Design and delivery of cement system to withstand well operations from spud to abandonment. (Click image to enlarge.) During well completion, when lightweight completion fluid replaces the drilling fluid, the negative pressure differential Flow After Cementing
Ashok Santra
Senior Scientist-Chemist
Melissa Calhoun
Technical Professional Manager
created can cause debonding at the casing-cement and/or cement-formation interfaces. Also, the cement sheath should withstand stresses from perforating operations and should resist cracking under the extreme pressure events that hydraulic fracturing operations created. Production cycling in many HPHT wells can create extreme pressure and temperature events that can cause cement sheath damage and eventual casing failure. In addition, cement sheath design should consider stresses created by the subsidence of unconsolidated formations resulting from prolonged production. Cementing Challenges Challenges in constructing an effective cement sheath for long- term zonal isolation involve both flow through unset cement and flow through set cement. Flow Through Unset Cement Annular gas flow or, in deepwater cementing, shallow water flow can cause flow through unset cement. Annular gas flow. Annular gas flow, sometimes called gas migration, occurs when gas channels form as the column of unset cement loses its ability to maintain overbalance pressure on the gas-bearing formation. Two types of gas migration are short- term, which occurs before the cement sets, and long-term, which develops after the cement has set. Annular gas flow often presents itself as gas bubbles at the top of the annulus or as inter-zonal gas flow detected by noise logs or temperature logs. However, even before this manifestation occurs, operators can accurately predict the potential for gas migration and use one or a combination of treatments to help prevent gas flow. Treatments may include: Improving fluid-loss control Increasing fluid density Shortening the cement column (using stage cementing Applying annulus pressure Using special thixotropic or compressible (foamed) cement slurries. A column of cement slurry should be sufficient to maintain an overbalance pressure on the gas-bearing formation and prevent gas migration until the cement is set. However, unless the cementing engineers design the slurry specifically to prevent gas flow during setting, it may not maintain the ability to transmit full hydrostatic pressure in a static condition. As static gel strength (SGS) begins to develop and/or the slurry loses fluid to permeable formations (slurry volume reduces), the probability of gas migration increases. Whether the gas migrates to a lower-
pressure zone or to the surface, the channels it forms remain permanently in the set cement.
Click image to enlarge Delayed gel time is the length of time from cement slurry placement until it begins to develop gel structure. A transition period, during which a cement column has sufficient gel strength to support itself (thus it cannot transmit hydrostatic pressure), but insufficient gel strength to prevent an influx of formation fluid should some volume loss occur as a result of fluid loss, follows. Throughout the slurry transition time, pressure exerted on the zone of interest decreases, allowing for the potential influx of fluid or gas. Therefore minimizing "Transition Time" of the cement slurry is critical for preventing water and gas flows. Gas Channel Formation
Cement slurry placed. Slurry behaves as a fluid. Transmits full hydrostatic pressure. Static gel strength development begins. Fluid loss to formations. Volume reduction causes pressure loss. Click images to enlarge To help prevent damaging gas channels from forming, operators should consider both short "Transition Time" and minimum reduction of slurry volume due to fluid loss. There is no single infallible way of preventing gas migration, but research has resulted in several techniques for estimating the severity of the problem and for helping to achieve control. Shallow water flow. Shallow water flow (SWF) is fluid flow that emanates from shallow reservoirs in deepwater. Geopressured, poorly consolidated sands located within a few thousand feet of the mud line cause SWF. In wells with SWF, seismic data and offset information help in deciding which cement slurry to use. When available, this Overbalance pressure is lost. Fluid loss continues in lower pressure zone. Gas enters wellbore and percolates up annulus. Percolation leads to gas channel formation. Permanent channel remains after cement sets.
information allows the engineers to determine the safe boundaries of pore pressure, fracture gradient, and equivalent circulating density (ECD). The cementing engineer can customize the job based on these parameters and current information as the well progresses. Due to high flow potentials and low temperatures, shallow water flows may require special slurries with very low volume reduction due to fluid loss to formation, short "Transition Times," and acceptable strength development. However, the latter two can be difficult to achieve at low temperatures. The compressible nature of a foamed cement may compensate for volume loss during transition time and for a longer transition period because a foamed fluid expands after it is in place, maintaining a positive pressure against a formation. Another advantage of foam cement for shallow water flows is that it offers the option of changing slurry density on the job without having to retest thickening times, fluid loss, free water and settling control again in the laboratory. The option of making last-minute density changes is especially important because the tops of the water flow formations and associated gradients vary greatly from well to well. Depending on the degree of flow, the base slurry for foaming may simply consist of standard cement with surfactants and accelerators, or it may consist of a specialty blend. Cementing engineers have created special blends that exhibit the required properties through their unique chemistries. Operators use several such blends in different parts of the world, and cementing engineers can customize their components to deal with the specific idiosyncrasies of local cements. Flow Through Set Cement Another challenge to maintaining an effective cement sheath is flow through set cement. Although long-term annular gas migration can be a frequent problem, cementing engineers have developed many solutions to help prevent and control gas flow in set cement. By determining the flow potential factor (FPF) prior to performing a cement job, operators can predict the gas migration problems that may arise afterwards, the severity of these problems, and the solutions appropriate for eliminating them. Also, design changes can help prevent gas migration. As usual, employing Halliburton's cementing best practices is the first key step in any successful cementing job. Additionally, advancements in cement slurry composition, mixing, pumping and placement capabilities have improved the reliability of placing the cement slurry and are prerequisites for effective zonal isolation on a short-term basis. However, well operations that occur after placement still greatly influence the integrity of the cement sheath.
Moreover, chances of cement sheath failure increase exponentially when the application involves deep, high- pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) wells, especially in remote, logistically challenging locations such as deepwater. Problems involving cement sheath failure that occur as a result of temperature- and pressure-induced stresses created by such universal well events as pressure testing, perforating, hydraulic fracturing, completion, production, and work over, or other remedial treatments remain long after the cement slurry has hydrated. Causes for cement sheath failure include gas flow through the set cement sheath which can be caused by flow through mud channels, micro-annular flow or flow through unset cement. Flow through mud channels is the primary cause of annular flow after cementing, accounting for over 90% of cases. It usually occurs due to poor mud displacement, which leaves mud pockets within the cement column that lack any compressive strength. Using an efficient/effective mud displacement technique, expansive or insitu gas generating additives in the cement, or a compressive cement such as a foam cement can mitigate this type of problem. WellLife Cementing Service: Preventing Cement Sheath Failure To remove the guesswork from designing and placing cementing systems capable of achieving long-term zonal isolation in the most demanding downhole environments, cementing engineers recommend using an advanced cementing service. These systems enable the design, placement and monitoring of advanced, fit-for-purpose oilfield cementing applications by maximizing the understanding of the unique cementing challenges posed at each phase in the construction of a well. One of these systems is Halliburton's WellLife cementing service - a three-step process designed to reduce the risk of cement sheath failure. First, operators should initiate the process long before drilling commences. By involving the WellLife cementing process early, Halliburton can identify potentially problematic well components during the planning stage, thereby altering the well design and construction program to minimize thermal and pressure stresses created during drilling, completion, or production operations. One of the features of the WellLife cementing service, advanced finite element analysis, helps determine the properties required in the cement sheath to withstand well operations during the life of the asset. The second step involves designing the cement slurry required to create the specific cementing solution prescribed by the initial comprehensive engineering analysis. Halliburton has developed a
complete selection of cement additives that can be prescribed individually, or in combination, for specific cementing issues. Since the cement slurry should be placed in the entire annulus to the desired depth, Halliburton has addressed the parameters to achieve this objective. Cementing engineers have optimized flow rate, rheology, density and formulation of spacer, flush and cement slurry for effective hole cleaning and cement slurry placement. Halliburton has input properties of the cement sheath determined in the laboratory, such as the tensile strength, Young's modulus, Poisson ratio, and thermal characteristics, into the WellLife analysis to determine the integrity of the cement sheath when it is subjected to recurring temperature and pressure cycling. The WellLife analysis also determines the volumetric change that occurs during cement hydration, which influences the initial stress state of the cement sheath. The third step of the WellLife process requires scaling up the recommended slurry formulation to the volume required for application in the field. At this time, Halliburton deploys the equipment, instrumentation and controls, along with experienced cementing engineers who properly mix, pump and place the cement slurry in the well. They then monitor the wells during their lifetime and update and improve the process as needed. A key benefit of WellLife cementing service is that it is equally adept at identifying well-construction and production scenarios with temperature and pressure envelopes that do not require advanced cementing systems to provide life-of-the-well zonal isolation. This is particularly valuable for operators who want to avoid using advanced cementing systems in applications in which less costly conventional oilfield cements will provide optimal performance. Conclusion The well-construction process allows operators but one chance to design and place a well's primary cementing system. Therefore, construction of a cement sheath that can provide complete zonal isolation in any environment should be a primary objective in any well construction project. A less than-optimal-cement sheath can reduce significantly a well's economic value by allowing water to be produced as part of the production stream much earlier than expected or by requiring the interruption of production to perform costly remedial cementing treatments. In worst-case scenarios, failure of the cement sheath can result in loss of the well. During the past half century, the oilfield service industry has developed and introduced a host of advanced cementing
strategies in an effort to overcome the obstacles that prevent the creation of effective and long lasting cement sheaths. The most prevalent causes of cement sheath failure are flow through unset cement and flow through set cement. By employing an advanced cementing service such as WellLife, cementing engineers can manage or eliminate both challenges. The WellLife cementing service provides unprecedented precision and certainty for engineers who are designing custom cementing systems that must provide long-term zonal isolation in HPHT, deepwater, gas, steam injection, geothermal and gas storage wells, all of which routinely exhibit temperature and pressure variances in excess of most oil and gas producing wells.
Click here to unsubscribe from future issues of Fuel from Knowledge Central. Send questions or comments to Fuel 2010 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved.