0% found this document useful (0 votes)
156 views7 pages

What Causes: Buildings To Fall?

A 10-story building in Delhi, India collapsed on November 15, 2010 due to heavy monsoon rains. The building was poorly constructed and its collapse killed several people. Other major building failures discussed in the document include the 1968 collapse of Ronan Point tower in London due to a gas explosion, and the 1993 Highland Towers collapse in Malaysia caused by a landslide after heavy rains and poorly maintained retaining walls. The document analyzes the causes of these failures and lessons learned about building design, construction, and maintenance.

Uploaded by

mahendranmahe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
156 views7 pages

What Causes: Buildings To Fall?

A 10-story building in Delhi, India collapsed on November 15, 2010 due to heavy monsoon rains. The building was poorly constructed and its collapse killed several people. Other major building failures discussed in the document include the 1968 collapse of Ronan Point tower in London due to a gas explosion, and the 1993 Highland Towers collapse in Malaysia caused by a landslide after heavy rains and poorly maintained retaining walls. The document analyzes the causes of these failures and lessons learned about building design, construction, and maintenance.

Uploaded by

mahendranmahe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

224 The Masterbu||der - May 2013 www.masterbu||der.co.

|n
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
60 The Masterbu||der - May 2013 www.masterbu||der.co.|n
1^! C^u3|3
8ILDING8 IO FALL?
3ooogopom 3esmoo||
Cm|et - Comleml eve|op~eml. C| - |mt|osl|uclu|e - |mv||om~eml
|story has repeated t|me and aga|n w|th devastat|ng co||apse o
huge bu||d|ngs, h|gh||ght|ng to mank|nd to rev|s|t conceptua||za-
Ht|on, des|gn, procurement & construct|on o bu||d|ngs rom the
standpo|nt o sound, sae and eth|ca| eng|neer|ng pract|ce.
Apparent|y, mass|ve so||d structures wor|d over have cracked, sp||t,
and crumb|ed to go crash|ng down |n seconds, and a|| thats |et |s debr|s
and a |ot o agony.
Bu||d|ngs, ||ke a|| structures, are des|gned to support certa|n |oads
sae|y. The |oads compr|se o we|ghts o peop|e and ob|ects, the we|ght o
ra|n and snow and w|nd pressure-ca||ed ||ve |oads wh||e the dead |oad |s
the bu||d|ng |tse|. n||ke |owr|se bu||d|ngs, |n ta|| bu||d|ngs o many |oors,
the support o the we|ght o the bu||d|ng |tse| |s the ma|n cons|derat|on,
wh||e the roo |s a |esser cons|derat|on. Ta|| bu||d|ngs a||ure cou|d be cata-
stroph|c.
The causes o bu||d|ng co||apse can be
c|ass||ed under certa|nheads as:
- Bad Des|gn
- Fau|ty Construct|on
- Foundat|onFa||ure
- Extraord|nary Loads
- nexpected Fa||ure Modes
- Comb|nat|ono Causes
Bad design |nc|udes not on|y errors
o computat|on, but a||ure to take |nto
account a|| the |oads the structure
shou|d be ab|e to carry or the bu||d|ngs
|ntended use. Prudent des|gn |s based
on estab||shed theor|es, re||ance on
accurate data, cogn|zance o the
eects o repeated or |mpu|s|ve
stresses, and proper cho|ce o mater|-
a|s based on |n-depth understand|ng
o the|r propert|es. Fa||ures many a t|me
enters a bu||d|ng pro|ect at the draw|ng
board |tse| due to |ack o due d|||gence
by the eng|neer. A case |n po|nt |s the
S|ngapore New Wor|d Hote| co||apse
c|ted where the structura| eng|neer
b|undered by orgett|ng to cons|der
the dead |oad o bu||d|ng |tse| |n the
des|gn|oads!
Faulty construction perhaps |s the
most |mportant cause o structura| a||-
ure. The |ack o proper construct|on
superv|s|on and t|me|y |nspect|on by
eng|neer & arch|tect |s a key contr|bu-
tor. Some au|ty pract|ces to be |rm|y
checked and stopped are the use o
sa|ty sand to make concrete, the sub-
st|tut|on o |ner|or stee| or that spec|-
|ed, bad r|vet|ng, |mproper t|ghten|ng
torque on nuts, excess|ve use o the dr|t
p|n to make ho|es ||ne up, bad we|ds,
and a|| such pract|ces we|| known as
taboo |nconstruct|on|e|d.
A foundation r|ght|y des|gned |s a
pre requ|s|te or every structure to
stand on, w|th ab|||ty to bear |oads that
the structure |s carry|ng. The earth
beneath the bu||d|ng shou|d be (or
made such) that structura| |oads can
be susta|ned.
Extraordinary loads can be caused
by natura| events, such as repeated
heavy snowa||s, or the shak|ng o an
earthquake, or the w|nds o a hurr|-
cane, wh|ch the structure shou|d be
capab|e o w|thstand|ng.
Unexpected failure modes turn out
to be the most comp|ex o the reasons
or co||apse. Such a||ure events are
great educators that goad the
des|gner, eng|neer & constructor to
|ook beyond the convent|ona|. Thus
each new type o structure can exh|b|t
unexpected a||ure, unt|| |ts propert|es
are we|| understood.
The r|ght m|x o comp||ance to
bu||d|ng codes comp|emented w|th
best eng|neer|ng des|gn pract|ce and
exper|ence, are the mantra or |ong
|ast|ng unct|ona||y competent bu||t
structures and sae bu||t env|ronment.
A c|ose |ook at h|gh r|ses a|ong the
t|me||ne, throws ||ght on the due d|||-
gence thats essent|a| r|ght through
the|r conceptua||z|ng, des|gn evo|u-
t|on, mater|a| |nputs, construct|on and
eventua| ma|ntenance dur|ng occupa-
t|on. Trag|c happen|ngs show how
th|ngs cou|d m|s|re |n the event o con-
sc|ous or unconsc|ous |etdowns
caused by promoters, des|gners or
managers o these estates that su-
ered a||ures. Brought out here are
some o the worst h|gh-r|se bu||d|ng
co||apses that h|gh||ght the |nadequa-
c|es that |ed to the m|shaps.
Ronan Point, London, EngIand
ln East London, on May 16, 1968, a
s|ng|e match tr|ggered the co||apse o
an ent|re corner o th|s mass|ve 22-
story bu||d|ng when 56-year-o|d lvy
Hodge, on the 18th |oor, ||t |t to make
herse| a cup o tea. The spark rom the
match was enough or a b|ast o gas
exp|os|on to tear apart the |o|nts con-
nect|ng the wa||s to the |oor and she
61 www.masterbu||der.co.|n The Masterbu||der - May 2013
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
Ponan Po|nt, London, Eng|and
62 The Masterbu||der - May www.masterbu||der.co.|n 2013
ound herse| on the ground |n a not so
pretty state.
The |oad-bear|ng wa||s had come
apart, |eav|ng the our apartments
above her w|thout any k|nd o structura|
support. What next? We||, one by one,
they came tumb||ng down, tear|ng
through the |oors be|ow ||ke a|||ng
dom|noes. At the end an ent|re corner
o the new|y constructed bu||d|ng |ay |n
shamb|es.
When Ponan Po|nt crashed, 260
peop|e were |n res|dence, o whom our
were k|||ed |n the d|saster, wh||e 17 were
|n|ured. lvy Hodge surv|ved!
Pub||c con|dence |n h|gh-r|se tower
bu||d|ngs was bad|y shaken.
Failure Cause: What caused th|s huge
a|| andthattoobyanotsob|ggas|gn|t|on?
The tower was constructed o pre-
cast concrete. Fa||ure o the s|ng|e
pane| caused one ent|re corner o the
bu||d|ng to co||apse. The pane| was
ab|e to be b|own out because there
was |nsu|c|ent re|norcement stee|
pass|ng between the pane|s. Th|s a|so
meant that the |oads carr|ed by the
pane| cou|d not be red|str|buted to
other ad|acent pane|s, s|nce there was
no route or the orces to o||ow. Co|-
|apse was |mm|nent.
Aftermath & Lessons Learnt: T|e them
we|| |s the |esson |earnt. Pe|norcements
re|norce! sethemasmuchasneeded.
As a resu|t o the co||apse, bu||d|ng
regu|at|ons were overhau|ed to prevent
d|sproport|onate co||apse. The under-
stand|ng o precast concrete deta|||ng
was great|y advanced.
Based on th|s many s|m||ar bu||d-
|ngs were a|tered or demo||shed.
HighIand Towers,
SeIangor, MaIaysia
December 11, 1993, the t|me 1:35
pm, a |ands||de w|th the orce o 200
|umbo |ets s|ams |nto the oundat|ons
o B|ock One o the H|gh|and Towers
apartment comp|ex. Eyew|tnesses
descr|be watch|ng the bu||d|ng a|| |n
"s|ow mot|on," o||owed by an eer|e
"deaen|ng s||ence."
Failure Cause: The H|gh|and Towers
comp|ex w|th three 12-story res|dent|a|
bu||d|ngs bu||t at the base o steep h|||
|ust outs|de o Ma|ays|as cap|ta| c|ty,
Kua|a Lumpur, had ser|ous prob|ems:
- The reta|n|ng wa||s and dra|nage
system had been poor|y des|gned
and bad|y ma|nta|ned.
- The s|tuat|on aggravated when
another deve|opment company
began construct|on on a r|dge |ust
above H|gh|and Towers. The |and
was str|pped and exposed to ero-
s|on, and some o the dra|nage
p|pes were b|ocked w|thbranches.
- Ten days o non-stop ra|n exerted
enormous pressure on the p|pes
caus|ng the p|pes to burst a|ong
var|ous po|nts on the h|||. The water
content o the so|| rose to danger-
ous |eve|s.
- Eventua||y, a |ands||p took down a
|arge reta|n|ng wa||.
Onehundredthousandsquaremeters
o mud s||d |nto B|ock One, carry|ng |t
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
H|gh|and Towers apartment comp|ex, Ma|ays|a
Bu||d|ng |n East De|h|
66 The Masterbu||der - 2013 May www.masterbu||der.co.|n
orward and eventua||y snapp|ng |t.
Three peop|e were pu||ed out a||ve
onthe |rst day. lnthe atermath, 48 bod-
|es were recovered.
B|ock two and b|ock three were
evacuated and stand empty to th|s day,
||ke gr|m, overgrowntombstones.
Lesson Learnt: Peta|n|ng wa||s take a
|ot o orce and need to be adequate|y
des|gned. Peta|n|ng wa||s bad|y
des|gned coup|ed w|th eventua| so||
eros|on were enough to |n|t|ate the
|ands||p w|th water on|y compound|ng
the m|shap.
DeIhi BuiIding CoIIapse,
New DeIhi, India
On November 15, 2010, monsoon
ra|ns br|ng down a poor|y constructed
tenement mu|t|-story bu||d|ng |n De|h|
w|th |||ega||y bu||t apartment b|ocks.
The structure crashed to the ground
w|thout warn|ng at 8:00 pm. Trag|ca||y
67 peop|e d|ed |n the co||apse and a
urther 150 were |n|ured.
Failure Cause: Structura| |nadequacy
&poor construct|onpract|ces.
Lessons Learnt: l||ega| construct|on |s
a s|ckness and demonstrat|on o poor
governance. D|||gent observat|on &
|nspect|on o||owed by upr|ght act|on
by c|v|| agenc|es a|one can check such
k|nds o m|shaps that are on the r|se
across the country.
SkyIine PIaza, Virginia, USA
On March 2, 1973, one o the Sky-
||ne P|aza comp|exs tower|ng apart-
ment bu||d|ngs co||apsed, |eav|ng
where |t once stood, a huge c|oud o
dust and debr|s.
Construct|onhadnt evenbeencom-
p|eted |n the comp|ex |n Ba||eys Cross-
roads, v|rg|n|a at the t|me o the d|sas-
ter and the bu||d|ng was not due to
openunt|| s|x months.
FailureCause: There was no |aw|nthe
des|gn.
lnvest|gat|onshowed that:
- Dur|ng construct|on the orms sup-
port|ng the concrete co|umns on
the 22nd |oor were premature|y
removed. The cement had not set
u||y by then. As a resu|t the co|-
umns cou|dnt bear the we|ght o
the 24th|oor and a||ed.
- The a||ure put an |ncreased
amount o pressure on the rest o
the co|umns on the 23rd |oor unt||
the ent|re |oor buck|ed and
s|ammed downonthe |oor be|ow.
- The bu||d|ng had not been eng|-
neered to w|thstand such a huge
|ncreased |oad, and the tremen-
dous we|ght proved catastroph|c.
Each |oor gradua||y succumbed
and p|ummeted onto the story
be|ow|na devastat|ng r|pp|e eect.
Fourteen construct|on workers d|ed
and 34 were |n|ured.
Lesson Learnt: Though des|gn
may be sound but so shou|d be the exe-
cut|on per des|gn and observ|ng r|ght
construct|on wh|ch pract|ce, |n th|s
case has been ound want|ng. lnspec-
t|on & test|ng coup|ed w|th regu|ar
superv|s|on are not mere orma||t|es
but act|v|t|es that can make or mar a
pro|ect, or sha|| we say, make or break
a bu||d|ng!
RoyaI PIaza HoteI, Nakhon
Ratchasima, ThaiIand
On August 13, 1993, at around
10:00 am, the sp|end|d s|x-story Poya|
P|aza Hote| |n Nakhon Patchas|ma,
Tha||and took a|| but |ess than 10 sec-
onds to come crash|ng down, c|ock|ng
|ust 1.6 seconds per |oor!
137 peop|e were k|||ed and 227
more were |n|ured |nthe co||apse.
The tragedy a|so c|a|med the ||e o
.S. A|r Force sergeant Pamon Canda,
whowas|ntown|nsta|||ngte|ephone||nes
at the Korat Poya| Tha| A|r Force Base.
"...When a docIor ma|es a m|sIa|e, he ||||s one;
When an eng|neer ma|es a m|sIa|e, he ||||s many."
oya|
P|ata
hoIe|
0o||apse
|n 1993
||||ed 137
Sky||ne P|aza, v|rg|n|a, SA
Poya| P|aza Hote|, Nakhon Patchas|ma, Tha||and Saety |rst s|ogan: Peop|es saety |s paramount
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
67 www.masterbu||der.co.|n The Masterbu||der - May 2013
Failure Cause: A||egat|ons were that
three stor|es had been added to the
bu||d|ng |n 1990 w|thout proper arch|-
tectura| rev|ew. A|so, a huge amount o
water was be|ng stored on the roo o
the hote| ahead o an expected water
shortage. Added to |ncrementa| |oad
over and above the a|ready extra |oad
o three extra stor|es.
Aftermath: Po||ce deta|ned the owner
o the Poya| P|aza Hote|, the arch|tect,
and an eng|neer. Court ordered |ve to
pay Bt152 m||||on compensat|on or
Hote| co||apse. Th|s case shou|d serve
as a rem|nder to every |oca| adm|n|stra-
t|ve organ|sat|on to never approve an
|nappropr|ate construct|on p|an, the
|awyer Weerasak Boonperng sa|d Peo-
p|es saety must come |rst.
Lotus Riverside Compound,
Shanghai, China
On June 27, 2009, B|ock 7, one o
e|even 13-story apartment bu||d|ngs
mak|ng up the Lotus P|vers|de com-
pound |n Shangha|, topp|ed over, com-
p|ete|y |ntact. The mass|ve structure e||
and was |y|ng |at w|th |ts oundat|on
p|||ars uprooted.
The h|gh-r|se was st||| under con-
struct|on, but |uck||y, most workers
were ab|e to evacuate when they e|t |t
start to a|| over.
Failure Cause: B|ock 7 e|| |ust one day
ater 272 eet o a nearby r|verbank co|-
|apsed, thus prov|ng the area to be
unstab|e and that the so|| was |oose. lt
was a case o the deve|opment com-
pany work|ng |||ega||y or |ve years on
s|te. Th|s ra|sed ser|ous concerns over
bu||d|ng pract|ces across Ch|na.
HoteI New WorId, Singapore
On March 15, 1986, a|| s|x stor|es o
Hote| NewWor|d co||apsed |n |ess than
60 seconds. The bu||d|ng housed a
hote|, a bank and a n|ghtc|ub, a|| o
wh|ch d|s|ntegrated |nto p||es o rock
and tw|sted meta|, bury|ng 50 peop|e
|ns|de.
lt was the worst d|saster S|ngapore
had exper|enced s|nce Wor|d War ll,
and |t shocked the nat|on.
Failure Cause: Ater |ntens|ve research,
|nvest|gators d|scovered a terr|b|e error
|n the or|g|na| des|gn o the bu||d|ng.
The structura| eng|neer had comp|ete|y
|et out the bu||d|ngs "dead |oad," |n
other words, the we|ght o the bu||d|ng
|tse|, dur|ng the des|gn process. As a
resu|t, |t wasnt strong enough to ho|d
|tse| up.
Trag|ca||y, Hote| New Wor|d was
doomed rom the beg|nn|ng.
Lesson Learnt: Th|s serves as a c|as-
s|c case o unpardonab|e proess|ona|
neg||gence. Leg|s|at|on to enorce
ma|ntenance checks every |ve years.
Three High-Rise Office BuiIdings,
Rio, BraziI
On January 26, 2012, a 20-story
bu||d|ng |n P|o de Jane|ro, Braz|| spon-
taneous|y co||apsed. The g|gant|c
h|gh-r|se crashed |nto another ten-
story bu||d|ng and a sma||er "three or
our" story bu||d|ng, reduc|ng a|| three
structures to one huge p||e o rubb|e.
The |mpact sent an enormous wave o
dust and detr|tus through the streets o
C|ne|and|a square, k||||ng at |east 17
peop|e. l the d|saster had occurred
|ust a ew hours ear||er, |t wou|d have
resu|ted |n mass casua|t|es. Fortu-
nate|y, the d|str|ct, home to many o|ce
bu||d|ngs and Braz||'s pr|zed Mun|c|pa|
Theater, was pretty deso|ate due to the
|ate hour o the co||apse.
Failure Cause: Author|t|es attr|buted
|||ega| construct|on work to have weak-
Lotus P|vers|de Compound, Shangha| Hote| New Wor|d, S|ngapore
Three H|gh-P|se O|ce Bu||d|ngs, P|o, Braz||
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
ened the 20-story bu||d|ng caused |t to
ragment, wh|ch |n turn tr|ggered a
cha|n react|on, br|ng|ng down the two
sma||er bu||d|ngs.
Aftermath: Th|s catastrophe has |ed
Braz|||an author|t|es to ca|| or reorms
and str|cter bu||d|ng and renovat|on
regu|at|ons, espec|a||y ahead o the
2014 Wor|d Cup.
Sampoong Department Store,
SeouI, South Korea
On June 29, 1995, |n the space o
20 seconds, the Sampoong Depart-
ment Store |n Seou|, South Korea e|| to
the ground, k||||ng 502 peop|e and
|n|ur|ng 937 mak|ng |t the |argest
peacet|me d|saster |n South Korean
h|story
FailureCause: The co||apse was ma|n|y
due to a structura| a||ure. Cr|m|na| neg-
||gence, d|sregard or eth|ca| eng|neer-
|ng pract|ces, and shoddy construct|on
|ed to structura| a||ure. Many a |esson
needs to be |earnt rom th|s d|saster:
1. Change o bu||d|ng use: The bu||d-
|ng, wh|ch was or|g|na||y des|gned to
be an o|ce bu||d|ng, was redes|gned
to be a department store. Change |n
use rom 'an o|ce bu||d|ng' to a 'de-
partment store' dec|ded when |t was
ha|way through|ts construct|on.
2. F|out|ng Des|gnNorms:
Desp|te the bu||d|ng not meant
to support a |th story, a |th
|oor added
The redes|gn |nvo|ved cutt|ng
away a severa| key support co|-
umns to accommodate the
esca|ators |nsta||at|on. Pedes|gn
dec|a-red unsae by contractors
& were term|nated. Construc-
t|on cont|nued w|th |n-house
company.
Th|s extra |eve| proved to be a
super-heavy, heated |oor (hea-
ted concrete base w|th hot water
p|pes go|ngthrough|t, as patrons
s|t on the |oor o trad|t|ona|
Korean restaurants). A|r cond|-
t|on|ng un|ts added to the roo
quadrup|ed the |oad the struc-
ture was des|gned to susta|n.
3. SubstandardMater|a|s&Construct|on:
Substandard concrete used
and had on|y ha| the 16 stee|
re|norc|ng bars |t needed.
A|so, the concrete co|umns
were th|nner than necessary
and were reduced even more
when |re sh|e|ds were |nsta||ed
around the esca|ators.
4. D|sregard to Ma|ntenance:
ln Apr|| 1995, extens|ve cracks
were spotted, revea||ng h|gh
r|sk o co||apse. These ractures
grew exponent|a||y, but man-
agement to not |ose the day's
revenue, reused to evacuate
the bu||d|ng.
Seven m|nutes beore the co|-
|apse, the bu||d|ng began to pop
andcrack, andemp|oyees soun-
ded the a|arm, but |t was too |ate
to avert d|saster, and 1,500 peo-
p|e were trapped |ns|de.
Aftermath & Lesson Learnt: Th|s trag|c
event |s a sad examp|e o uneth|ca|
dec|s|ons. Many aced |mpr|sonment
or neg||gence and br|bery ater the |nc|-
dent
Sampoong Department Store, Seou|, South Korea
68 The Masterbu||der - 2013 May www.masterbu||der.co.|n
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
The Sampoong co||apse on|y made
the pub||c aware o a dead|y prob|em
that p|agued the|r structures. Out o the
|nvest|gat|on, 14% o SouthKoreansky-
scrapers were unsae, 84% needed
repa|r, and on|y 2% met codes and gov-
ernment standards.
The d|saster |ater put a quest|on-
mark regard|ng saety standards on
other eng|neer|ng pro|ects be|ng
undertaken as South Korea |n 1980s &
90s was exper|enc|ng an econom|c
boom. A deta||ed rev|ew o South
Koreansaety regu|at|ons resu|ted
Twin Towers, New York City, USA
W|thout a doubt, the most devastat-
|ng bu||d|ng co||apse |n h|story was that
o the Wor|d Trade Center, on Septem-
ber 11, 2001.
The Tw|n Towers were masteru||y
eng|neeredus|ng||ghtwe|ght stee|, acen-
tra| core, and an egg-crate des|gn cre-
at|ng a "redundant" structure. ln other
words, | one co|umn or support were to
a||, another wou|d take |ts p|ace.
Each bu||d|ng cou|d hand|e 5,000
tons o |atera| w|nd-|oad. The
we|ght o the |ets were not enough
to overcome the strength o these
per|meter co|umns.
Though 90,000 ga||ons o burn|ng
|et ue| d|dn't me|t the stee| co|umns
ho|d|ng up the bu||d|ng, |t de|n|te|y
weakened them.
W|th 50 percent o the|r prev|ous
strength the co|umns st||| cou|d
ho|d upthe bu||d|ng.
The uneven temperature o the |re,
d|stortedthestee| onones|deo sky-
scraper caus|nga stress that proved
too much, |ead|ng to eventua| buck-
||ng o the |oors. And then began a
dom|no co||apse, pancak|ng down
one ontopo the other.
Each tower we|gh|ng 500,000 tons,
|n |ust ten seconds, had the bu||d|ngs
co||aps|ng, to h|t the ground at 124
mph.
LessonLearnt
Desp|te the act that there were no
spec||c eng|neer|ng |aws |nvo|ved |n
the des|gn o the Tw|n Towers, eng|neers
re||g|ous|y cont|nue study|ng the bu||d-
|ngs to |earn more about redundant
des|gn and progress|ve co||apse, and
most |mportant|y, w|th the a|mo ormu-
|at|ng ||e-sav|ng saety and evacuat|on
procedures |nthe uture.
PartingWords of Wisdom:
Tota| progress|ve co||apse, |s an
eng|neer|ng phenomenon, |rst recog-
n|zed |n Ponan Po|nt, where TPC tr|g-
gered the part|a| co||apse that brought
an ent|re corner o the comp|ex buck-
||ng to the ground.
Any bu||d|ngs bear|ng severe, con-
centrated b|ows that cr|pp|e s|gn||cant
structura| components (support beams,
co|umns, etc.) can crumb|e | the dam-
ages aren't conta|ned and | compo-
nents e|sewhere b|owout.
Accord|ng to Mechan|cs o Pro-
gress|ve Co||apse, when upper |oors
crash down on those be|ow, sand
w|ch|ng |ayers o rubb|e and debr|s, the
|n|t|a| he|ght o a story reduces to ,
where ex-presses the compact|on
rat|o. (ln |n|te-stra|n theory, |s ca||ed
"stretch."). From here, "the |oad can
|ncreasew|thout bounds."
TPCis a two-phase process: Crush-
down, whereby grav|ty and the |mmense
downward k|net|c thrust o |oors upon
mashed |oors success|ve|y crushes
everyth|ng be|ow, g|ves way to Crush-
up, the ree-a|||ng top|oors now p|||ng
on top o the wreckage.
The 9/11 destruct|on o the Wor|d
TradeCentre(WTC) wasab|gsurpr|seor
the structura| eng|neer|ng proess|on.
No exper|enced structura| eng|neer
expected the WTC towers to co||apse.
The act that |t d|d, co||apse compe||ed
|ndepthexam|nat|on.
The WTC |s test|mony to the danger o
progress|ve co||apse, as do,
- The co||apse o Ponan Po|nt apart-
ments |nthe n|ted K|ngdom |n
- The NewWor|d Hote| |nS|ngapore,
- The 2000 Commonwea|th Ave.
tower |n Boston |n 1971, tr|ggered
by punch|ng o |nsu|c|ent|y hard-
ened s|ab,
- among the ones d|scussed here
and many others.
Progress|ve co||apse |s poss|b|e
even or the mass|ve |oad-bear|ng con-
crete cores o the ta||est recent sky-
scrapers, though |t wou|d be much
harder to |n|t|ate. However, once a |oca|
damage causes a su|c|ent downward
d|sp|acement o the super|or part o
structure, co||apse |s unstoppab|e.
Tota| progress|ve co||apse |s a poten-
t|a| "a||uremode"o extremeconcern!
70 The Masterbu||der - 2013 May www.masterbu||der.co.|n
Bu||d|ng Fa||ures
Tw|n Towers co||apse on 11 September 2001

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy