View Scores: Security Information

View Scores
Registration Number: 0000000022533890
Request additional score reports
Security Information
Type: Passport
Country: Ecuador
ID: 1710055839
Test
Test Date
TOEFL
Fri Aug 22 07:28:44 EDT 2014
iBT
Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total

29
29
22
20
100
How to interpret scores
Reading Skills
Level
Your Performance
Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically
understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of
reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts.
Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically
Reading
High(22-30)
Listening Skills
Level
have a very good command of academic vocabulary and

grammatical structure;
can understand and connect information, make appropriate
inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is
conceptually dense and the language is complex;
can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role
that specific information serves within the larger text, even
when the text is conceptually dense; and
can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is
conceptually dense and contains complex language.
Your Performance
Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically
understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide
range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult
vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language),
complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or
making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information.
When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at
the HIGH level typically can
Listening
High(22-30)
understand main ideas and important details, whether they are

stated or implied;
distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
understand how information is being used (for example, to
provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex
process);
recognize how pieces of information are connected (for
example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
understand many different ways that speakers use language for
Speaking Skills
Speaking about
familiar topics
Speaking about
campus situations
Speaking about
academic course
content
Writing Skills
Level
Fair(2.5 - 3.0)
Fair(2.5 - 3.0)
Fair(2.5 - 3.0)
purposes other than to give information (for example, to

emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or
convey intentions indirectly); and
synthesize information, even when it is not presented in
sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that
information.
Your Performance
Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about your
personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and coherent
manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only occasional errors.
Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat limited and include some errors.
At times, the limitations prevent you from elaborating fully on your ideas,
but they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading

material and experiences typically encountered by university students.
You are able to convey relevant information about conversations,
newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are
missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and
pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do
not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about
academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication
problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to
understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation
may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar
and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are
not fully developed or are inaccurate.
Level
Your Performance
You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your
response indicates weaknesses such as
Writing based on
Fair(2.5 - 3.5)
reading and listening
an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or

inaccurate;
there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading
passage are related; and/or
grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may
make the writing difficult to understand.
You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your
response indicated weaknesses such as
Writing based on
knowledge and
experience
Fair(2.5 - 3.5)
you may not provide enough specific support and development

for your main points;
your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you
organize your essay or because of the language you use to
connect your ideas; and/or
grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may
make the writing difficult to understand.

View Scores: Security Information

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

View Scores: Security Information

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

View Scores: Security Information

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

View Scores

Registration Number: 0000000022533890

Request additional score reports

Reading Listening Speaking Writing Total

How to interpret scores

have a very good command of academic vocabulary and

understand main ideas and important details, whether they are

purposes other than to give information (for example, to

Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading

an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or

you may not provide enough specific support and development

make the writing difficult to understand.

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.