Dune Jewelry v. Rebecca James - Complaint
Dune Jewelry v. Rebecca James - Complaint
Dune Jewelry v. Rebecca James - Complaint
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Upon information and belief, Rebecca James, LLC is a Florida limited liability
company with a principal place of business at 321 Beach Road Sarasota, FL 34243.
3.
Rebecca James, LLC is doing business under the fictitious name Tropicality.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
4.
This action arises under 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. including 35 U.S.C. 271, 281, 283,
284, and 285. Accordingly, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28
U.S.C. 1331 and 1338.
5.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims asserted in this Complaint
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338. This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over the
pendent state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a).
6.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Tropicality through its purposeful
minimum contacts with Massachusetts, as Tropicality has been engaged in substantial and
continuous business in this Judicial District.
7.
This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Tropicality as Tropicality has
A.
9.
On October 24, 2013, Dune Jewelry and/or its predecessor in interest filed an
application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (hereinafter the "USPTO") for a
U.S. Design Patent entitled SAND JEWELRY, to which the USPTO assigned Application No.
29/470,752.
10.
The D113 Patent claims the ornamental design for sand jewelry.
B.
12.
On October 24, 2013, Dune Jewelry and/or its predecessor in interest filed an
application with the USPTO for a U.S. Design Patent entitled SAND JEWELRY, to which the
USPTO assigned Application No. 29/470,755.
13.
The D589 Patent claims the ornamental design for sand jewelry.
C.
15.
16.
sand and infringe the claims of at least one of Dune Jewelrys issued patents.
17.
Tropicality manufactures, offers to sell, and sells the infringing products in the
Tropicality offers for sale the infringing products throughout the United States (e.g.,
Tropicality has sold at least one, if not all, of the infringing products in
Massachusetts.
D.
Sandbar Trademark
20.
Dune Jewelry has been using the mark Sandbar in conjunction with the offering
21.
On January 22, 2015 Dune Jewelry filed an in-use trademark application with the
USPTO for the mark Sandbar in international class 14 for Jewelry (Sandbar Application). The
Sandbar Application was issued Serial No. 86511361 by the USPTO.
22.
Upon information and belief, Tropicality is currently selling its horizontal silver
23.
Tropicality does minimal research and development of their own, and simply copy Dune Jewelrys
patented products.
24.
Tropicality tarnishes Dune Jewelrys reputation and erodes Dune Jewelrys ability
to leverage its patents by making misleading statements to potential purchasers of Dune Jewelrys
patented products and by providing inferior copycat products which tarnishes the sand jewelry
industry.
F.
25.
advertising and sale of the above identified infringing products, sent a letter to the Defendant to
inform it of Dune Jewlerys patents and other intellectual property rights, and provided the
Defendant notice of their infringing items. Exhibit J.
26.
Defendant confirmed receipt of the letter, but never responded in substance and
never ceased manufacturing, using, advertising, or selling any of the above alleged infringing
products.
27.
Upon information and belief, Defendant has committed the infringing acts
COUNT I
(INFRINGEMENT OF THE D113 PATENT)
28.
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1-
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287, examples of notice include a letter dated June 10, 2014
On information and belief, Tropicality has and continues to, without license from
Dune Jewelry, infringe the D113 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), by manufacturing, using, selling
and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the United States one or more of
the infringing products, which embody the design covered by the D113 design patent.
31.
On information and belief, Tropicality has and continues to, without license from
Dune Jewelry, induce others (e.g., third party re-sellers) to infringe the D113 patent under 35
U.S.C. 271(b), by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into
the United States one or more of the infringing products, which embody the design covered by the
D113 design patent, through a network of third party websites and stores who sell directly to
consumers.
32.
Dune Jewelry has been, is being and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will
continue to be injured in its business and property rights, and has suffered, is suffering and will
continue to suffer injury and damages for which it is entitled to relief under 35 U.S.C. 284
adequate to compensate for such infringement, but in no case less than a reasonable royalty.
33.
Tropicality has also caused, is causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the
Court, will continue to cause irreparable harm to Dune Jewelry for which it is entitled to
preliminary and permanent injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.
34.
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1-
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287, examples of notice include a letter dated June 10, 2014
On information and belief, Tropicality has and continues to, without license from
Dune Jewelry, infringe the D589 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), by manufacturing, using, selling
and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the United States one or more of
the infringing products, which embody the design covered by the D589 design patent.
38.
On information and belief, Tropicality has and continues to, without license from
Dune Jewelry, induce others (e.g., third party re-sellers) to infringe the D589 patent under 35
U.S.C. 271(b), by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into
the United States one or more of the infringing products, which embody the design covered by the
D589 design patent, through a network of third party websites and stores who sell directly to
consumers.
39.
Dune Jewelry has been, is being and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the Court, will
continue to be injured in its business and property rights, and has suffered, is suffering and will
continue to suffer injury and damages for which it is entitled to relief under 35 U.S.C. 284
adequate to compensate for such infringement, but in no case less than a reasonable royalty.
40.
Tropicality has also caused, is causing and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by the
Court, will continue to cause irreparable harm to Dune Jewelry for which it is entitled to
preliminary and permanent injunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. 283.
41.
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1-
As a result of the conduct of the Tropicality as described above, and unless the relief
sought in this Complaint is granted, Tropicality will unjustly benefit from and be unjustly enriched
by, their own intentional and wrongful acts.
COUNT IV
(Common Law Trademark Infringement)
45.
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1-
Plaintiff has used and has continued to use, without interruption, the Sandbar mark
By virtue of its exclusive and continued use of the Sandbar mark, Plaintiff has
acquired the sole and exclusive right to use said mark in connection with jewelry. As a result of
nationwide, and international, advertising and sales of jewelry in connection with the Sandbar
mark, Plaintiff has gained recognition and good will in the mark for use with the jewelry.
48.
Without the consent of the Plaintiff, Tropicality is offering for sale and selling
Tropicalitys use of Sandbar in connection with jewelry has caused, and will
continue to cause, a likelihood of confusion, mistake or deception, all to the Plaintiff's irreparable
injury and Tropicalitys unjust enrichment and benefit in violation of Plaintiff's common law
trademark rights and constitute a fraud on the public.
50.
Tropicalitys use of Sandbar in connection with jewelry has caused and is likely
to continue to cause members of the public to believe that the Tropicalitys jewelry is offered by
way of the Plaintiff or with the approval, consent and or sponsorship of the Plaintiff.
51.
As the direct and proximate result of Tropicalitys infringement, the Plaintiff has
suffered, and will continue to suffer, monetary loss and irreparable injury to its business,
reputation, and good will warranting an injunction and an award of monetary damages.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all claims so triable.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, as relief, Plaintiff respectfully prays for a judgment against Defendant as
follows:
A.
A judgment that Defendant has infringed one of more claims of each of Dune
An order and judgment preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendant and its
officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, affiliates, attorneys, and all others acting in privity
or in concert with them, and their parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors and assigns, from
further acts of infringement of Dune Jewelrys asserted patents and trademarks;
C.
Defendants infringement of Dune Jewelrys asserted patents, and in no event less than a
reasonable royalty for Defendants acts of infringement, including all pre-judgment and postjudgment interest at the maximum rate permitted by law;
D.
A judgment awarding Dune Jewelry all damages, including treble damages, based
on any infringement found to be willful, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, together with prejudgment
interest;
E.
entitling Dune Jewelry to an award of its reasonable attorney fees, expenses and costs in this action
as well as pre-judgment and post judgment interests;
F.
Dune Jewelry has such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and
equitable.
Dated: February 27, 2015
Respectfully Submitted,
Attorney for Defendant
By: /s/ Brendan M. Shortell
Brendan M. Shortell (BBO# 675851)
Gary E. Lambert (BBO# 548303)
Lambert & Associates
92 State Street
Suite 200
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: 617.720.0091
Facsimile: 617.720.6307
shortell@lambertpatentlaw.com
Exhibit A
(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent No.:
Daniels Christensen
(54)
SAND JEWELRY
8,281,465
2006/0166002
2007/0104928
2010/0166997
2010/0300149
2010/0307671
[Online]
14 Years
(63)
(58)
Yokochi et a1.
Ghisaka et a1.
Seliktar
David
http://data.uncomm0ng00ds.com.edgesuite.net/images/
Filed:
.............................................. ..
11-01
U.S. Cl.
USPC
5/2007
7/2010
12/2010
12/2010
(22)
10/2012 Miraldi
7/2006 Grey et a1.
(51)
(52)
B1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
MA (US)
(**)
US D705,113 S
* cited by examiner
Primary Examiner * Garth Rademaker
Assistant Examiner * Melanie Pellegrini
(56)
References Cited
(57)
CLAIM
3,997,686 A
D252,561 S
D306,707 S *
D311,356 S
8/1979
2/1982 MacFaden
11/1983
Weeks ............... ..
10/1990
*
*
7/2010
2/2012
6,607,818 B1
D619,919 S
D654,391 S
9/1976
embodies my design;
12/1976 McClure
D263,029 S *
D271,188 S
7/1960 Daniel
11/1969 Dante et a1.
12/1974 Traenckner et al.
D11/61
D11/61
D11/75
US. Patent
ig. 2
Fig. 4
Fig. 6
US D705,113 S
Fig. 3
Exhibit B
(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent No.:
Daniels Christensen
(54)
SAND JEWELRY
2010/0166997 A1
2010/0300149 A1
2010/0307671 A1
MA (US)
(**)
Filed:
14 Years
[Online] http://wwwcafepress.c0m/+threeipawisandinecklacei
[Online] http://j.horloger-paris.com/23607-34337-h0me/ch0pard
pendant-happy-diamonds-795759-1003jpg. Accessed Nov. 26,
2013*
Andrew Goss, Introduction to Basic Concrete Jewelry, 2004 pp. 1-4.
(63)
(51)
(52)
(58)
http://data.uncomm0ng00ds.com.edgesuite.net/images/
11-01
(56)
.............................................. ..
U.S. Cl.
USPC
[Online]
MA (US)
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
US D704,589 S
*1. May 13, 2014
References Cited
DESCRIPTION
2,943,953
3,477,990
3,856,644
3,997,686
A
A
A
A
D311,504 S
6,607,818 B1
D583,698 S
D619,492 S
8,281,465 B1
2006/0166002 A1
2007/0104928 A1
3/1907
7/1960
11/1969
12/1974
12/1976
Daniel
Dante et a1.
Traenckner et a1.
McClure
10/1990
10/2012 Miraldi
7/2006 Grey et a1.
5/2007 Yokochiet a1.
new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevation view of the sand jewelry;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevation view of the sand jewelry;
FIG. 4 is a bottom view ofthe sandjewelry;
FIG. 5 is a top view of the sand jewelry; and,
FIG. 6 is a side view of the sand jewelry.
U S. Patent
M y 13, 2014
US D704,589 S
Fig, 4
"ig, 6
Pig. 5
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
2/27/2015
SandbarNecklaceNecklacesJewelry
Case 1:15-cv-10597 Document
1-9 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1Exhibit
of 2
MEN U
Sandbar
Necklace
TheSandbar.Aperfectplayonwordsaccompaniesthis
statementmakingnecklace.Asterlingsilver,1.75x.25bezel
isfilledwithyourchoiceofbeachsand,thenhandsandedand
polishedtothefinalmattefinish.Availablewith16",18"or20"
silverchainorblackcord.
SKU: SBAR_N
$154.00
S E LECT A SA ND
PROVIDE YOUR OWN SAND
TYPE*
CHOOSE AN OPTION...
SIZE*
CHOOSE AN OPTION...
QTY:
https://dunejewelry.com/jewelry/necklaces/sandbarnecklace
ADD TO CART
1/2
2/27/2015
SandbarNecklaceNecklacesJewelry
Case 1:15-cv-10597 Document
1-9 Filed 02/27/15 Page 2 of 2
ADD TO CART
ADD TO WISHLIST
Fine
Print
RETURN PO
LICY
WARRANTY
& REPAIR
PRIVACY P
OLICY
Stay in the
Loop
Send Us Your
Sand
Signupforallthelatest
news&specialoffersfrom
DuneJewelry
Detailedinstructionson
howtosendusyoursand
S E E DE TA ILS
EMAIL ADDRESS
GO
BECOME A
DEALER
2015DUNEJEWELRY.ALLRIGHTSRESERVEDU.S.PATENTNO.D705,113D704,589&OTHERPATENTSPENDING
https://dunejewelry.com/jewelry/necklaces/sandbarnecklace
2/2
Exhibit J
JS 44 (Rev. 12/12)
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
Suffolk
Sarasota Florida
U.S. Government
Plaintiff
Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
U.S. Government
Defendant
Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
DEF
1
Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country
Foreign Nation
TORTS
110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Excludes Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veterans Benefits
160 Stockholders Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise
REAL PROPERTY
210 Land Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
240 Torts to Land
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All Other Real Property
PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Federal Employers
Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
360 Other Personal
Injury
362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice
CIVIL RIGHTS
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
445 Amer. w/Disabilities Employment
446 Amer. w/Disabilities Other
448 Education
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
PERSONAL INJURY
365 Personal Injury Product Liability
367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal
Injury Product
Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Personal
Property Damage
385 Property Damage
Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
463 Alien Detainee
510 Motions to Vacate
Sentence
530 General
535 Death Penalty
Other:
540 Mandamus & Other
550 Civil Rights
555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee Conditions of
Confinement
BANKRUPTCY
422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
840 Trademark
LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
720 Labor/Management
Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and Medical
Leave Act
790 Other Labor Litigation
791 Employee Retirement
Income Security Act
SOCIAL SECURITY
861 HIA (1395ff)
862 Black Lung (923)
863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
864 SSID Title XVI
865 RSI (405(g))
OTHER STATUTES
IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization Application
465 Other Immigration
Actions
2 Removed from
State Court
Remanded from
Appellate Court
4 Reinstated or
Reopened
5 Transferred from
Another District
(specify)
6 Multidistrict
Litigation
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
35 U.S.C. 271
DEMAND $
DOCKET NUMBER
02/27/2015
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT #
AMOUNT
APPLYING IFP
JUDGE
MAG. JUDGE
(b)
(c)
Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II.
Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III.
Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV.
Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.
V.
VI.
Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII.
Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
2. Category in which the case belongs based upon the numbered nature of suit code listed on the civil cover sheet. (See local
rule 40.1(a)(1)).
I.
410, 441, 470, 535, 830*, 891, 893, 895, R.23, REGARDLESS OF NATURE OF SUIT.
II.
110, 130, 140, 160, 190, 196, 230, 240, 290,320,362, 370, 371, 380, 430, 440, 442, 443, 445, 446, 448, 710, 720,
740, 790, 820*, 840*, 850, 870, 871.
III.
120, 150, 151, 152, 153, 195, 210, 220, 245, 310, 315, 330, 340, 345, 350, 355, 360, 365, 367, 368, 375, 385, 400,
422, 423, 450, 460, 462, 463, 465, 480, 490, 510, 530, 540, 550, 555, 625, 690, 751, 791, 861-865, 890, 896, 899,
950.
*Also complete AO 120 or AO 121. for patent, trademark or copyright cases.
3. Title and number, if any, of related cases. (See local rule 40.1(g)). If more than one prior related case has been filed in this
district please indicate the title and number of the first filed case in this court.
4. Has a prior action between the same parties and based on the same claim ever been filed in this court?
YES
NO
5. Does the complaint in this case question the constitutionality of an act of congress affecting the public interest?
2403)
YES
NO
YES
NO
(See 28 USC
6. Is this case required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges pursuant to title 28 USC 2284?
YES
NO
7. Do all of the parties in this action, excluding governmental agencies of the United States and the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (governmental agencies), residing in Massachusetts reside in the same division? - (See Local Rule 40.1(d)).
YES
A.
NO
B.
Central Division
Western Division
If no, in which division do the majority of the plaintiffs or the only parties, excluding governmental agencies,
residing in Massachusetts reside?
Eastern Division
Central Division
Western Division
8. If filing a Notice of Removal - are there any motions pending in the state court requiring the attention of this Court? (If yes,
submit a separate sheet identifying the motions)
YES
NO
Brendan M. Shortell
TELEPHONE NO.
617-720-5822
(CategoryForm9-2014.wpd )