Efficiencies Creasing Characteristics,: of Physical Chemistry, School, Boston)
Efficiencies Creasing Characteristics,: of Physical Chemistry, School, Boston)
Efficiencies Creasing Characteristics,: of Physical Chemistry, School, Boston)
458
459
FIG. 1
Donnan pressure
The plasma proteins are not neutral non-electrolytes, and their ionic charges have an important effect on the osmotic pressure. The
extension of Van't Hoff's theory to this case
was carried out by Donnan. We will limit
ourselves to the special case of the sodium salt
of a non-diffusible protein anion and sodium
chloride, which is a rough approximation of
plasma. The solution must be electrically neutral. So, if there is no sodium chloride present,
the pressure-concentration ratio corresponds to
460
2C_-zC-2CC
P _ RT
= M[+
C_]
(2
M 2[ - +
2-(l-
lC
zC
91 ~C =1
zC
2C
zC2C .
M [
4CRT RT(z/M)'c RT M(z/M)'P
M
M
4C_
4C_
For a neutral molecule, z is equal to zero, and P/c = RT/M
at all concentrations. For an ion z2C/4C_ is zero only
when C is zero, and in dilute solutions P/c increases as a
linear function of c when C_ is constant.
For a real solution we may also write
P RT
- = M~ + bc + dc2 + * c
or
T + BP + DP' + ...
M
in which b and d or B and D are constants. The latter
form is more useful for our purposes because
1 RT
c
RT
+ C++ c--
C/+ -C'_]
-C.
MP-
461
pressure measurements, 69,000, is in good agreement with that obtained from sedimentation
and diffusion measurements reported in the first
paper of this series (1). The plasma curve (C)
has a smaller initial slope which corresponds to a
larger molecular weight, 93,000. All the experimental curves become steeper at higher concentrations. The difference between A and C is
proportional to the concentration.
In Figure 2 is shown the pressure-concentration ratio, P/c, versus the pressure.7 The ideal
Van't Hoff curve, E, is here a horizontal line
whose ordinate is the slope of E in Figure 1.
A and B intercept E at zero pressure, corresponding to the same initial slopes in Figure 1, but
they deviate sharply at higher pressures. The
plasma curve, C, has a lower intercept, corresponding to the larger average molecular weight
of plasma proteins, and the difference between
A and C is here independent of the pressure.
If 60 grams per cent of the plasma protein is
albumin (1), curve C as drawn would give an
average molecular weight of 194,000 for the
remaining 40 per cent. However, our measurements do not preclude drawing the intercept at
2.1 rather than 2.0, which would correspond to an
average molecular weight of 88,000, and a
molecular weight of 150,000 for the 40 grams per
cent which are not albumin. The probable value
for the average molecular weight of plasma
6 The ionic charges on proteins cause deviations from globulins is 170,000.
Osmotic effiiency
We are particularly interested in the volume
of solution per gram of protein, 1/c, at a given
7 The.experimental points are shown in Figure 2, whose
scale is larger than that of Figure 1. The measurements
on plasma are indicated by crosses, those on human albumin by open circles, and those on bovine albumin by
filled circles. The measurements at pH 5.4 have a perpendicular line through the circles.
The measurements on albumin at pH 5.4 are carried to
dilute enough solutions so that there is little uncertainty
about the extrapolation to zero concentration and the
resultant molecular weight. The measurements on plasma
have not been carried to such dilution, so the curve has
been drawn parallel to that for albumin.
462
8 30
25
_-
40
X--U
10'
20
.I
I
0 * cP *. .7
S
'
Ia
0*
58N.)
-
--
1'* *
15
/0
IC
6. e
3i
E.
.I0%
I.
(I1)
-6 tO
10
V)
aIt
(A
u)
:9
20
_~~~~~~
_-
I
0
so
40
Osmotic Pressure, P. (m Hg)
120
5.0
60
7.0
8.0
pH
FIG. 4
FIG. 3
P/c=268+(0.4+0.9 pH)P=
268
1+(0.4+0.9 pH)c
COMMENT
P/c
268(1 - 0.42 g)
1+ (0.4+0.9pH)c
For normal plasma this equation gives a limiting value at
zero concentration which is too large, but it should give a
fair representation of the results in undiluted plasma or
serum.
463
464
BIBLIOGRAPHY
dried plasma container or 100 cc. of 25 per cent
albumin.
1. Cohn, E. J., OncIey, J. L., Strong, L. E., Hughes, W.
SUMMARY
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.