Julian (Emperor)
Julian (Emperor)
Julian (Emperor)
1
1.1
Life
Early life
Initially growing up in Bithynia, raised by his maternal grandmother, at the age of seven he was under the
guardianship of Eusebius of Nicomedia, the semi-Arian
Christian Bishop of Nicomedia, and taught by Mardonius, a Gothic eunuch, whom Julian wrote warmly of
later. After Eusebius died in 342, both Julian and
Gallus were exiled to the imperial estate of Macellum
in Cappadocia. Here Julian met the Christian bishop
George of Cappadocia, who lent him books from the classical tradition. At the age of 18, the exile was lifted and
he dwelt briey in Constantinople and Nicomedia.[12]
LIFE
1.2
Caesar in Gaul
ucation, Julian proved to be an able military commander, obtaining an important victory in Gaul and leading a Roman army
under the walls of the Sassanid Empire's capital.
After dealing with the rebellions of Magnentius and Sylvanus, Constantius felt he needed a permanent representative in Gaul. In 355, Julian was summoned to appear
before the emperor in Mediolanum and on 6 November
was made Caesar of the West, marrying Constantius sister, Helena. Constantius, after his experience with Gallus, intended his representative to be more a gurehead
than an active participant in events, so he packed Julian
o to Gaul with a small retinue and Constantius prefects
in Gaul would keep him in check. At rst reluctant to
trade his scholarly life for war and politics, he eventually
took every opportunity to involve himself in the aairs
of Gaul.[16] In the following years Julian learned how to
lead and then run an army, through a series of campaigns With Barbatio safely out of the picture, King
against the Germanic tribes that had settled on both sides Chnodomarius led a confederation of Alamanni
of the Rhine.
forces against Julian and Severus at the of Battle of Ar-
1.3
Rebellion in Paris
1.2.2
Rebellion in Paris
4
Raetia.[36] Julian then divided his forces, sending one column to Raetia, one to northern Italy and the third he led
down the Danube on boats. His forces claimed control
of Illyricum and his general, Nevitta, secured the pass of
Succi into Thrace. He was now well out of his comfort
zone and on the road to civil war.[37] (Julian would state
in late November that he set o down this road because,
having been declared a public enemy, I meant to frighten
him [Constantius] merely, and that our quarrel should result in intercourse on more friendly terms...[38] )
LIFE
tian burial, escorting the body to the Church of the Apostles, where it was placed alongside that of Constantine.[41]
This act was a demonstration of his lawful right to the
throne.[42] He is also now thought to have been responsible for the building of Santa Costanza on a Christian site
just outside Rome as a mausoleum for his wife Helena
and sister-in-law Constantina.[43]
The new Emperor rejected the style of administration of
his immediate predecessors. He blamed Constantine for
the state of the administration and for having abandoned
the traditions of the past. He made no attempt to restore
the tetrarchal system begun under Diocletian. Nor did
he seek to rule as an absolute autocrat. His own philosophic notions led him to idealize the reigns of Hadrian
and Marcus Aurelius. In his rst panegyric to Constantius, Julian described the ideal ruler as being essentially
primus inter pares (rst among equals), operating under the same laws as his subjects. While in Constantinople therefore it was not strange to see Julian frequently
active in the Senate, participating in debates and making
speeches, placing himself at the level of the other members of the Senate.[44]
1.6
5
that the re was the result of an accident.[50][51]
6
Emperor he had risen against, and he had tried to woo it
through the Chalcedon Tribunal. However, to solidify his
position in the eyes of the eastern army, he needed to lead
its soldiers to victory and a campaign against the Persians
oered such an opportunity.
An audacious plan was formulated whose goal was to lay
siege on the Sassanid capital city of Ctesiphon and denitively secure the eastern border. Yet the full motivation
for this ambitious operation is, at best, unclear. There was
no direct necessity for an invasion, as the Sassanids sent
envoys in the hope of settling matters peacefully. Julian
rejected this oer.[59] Ammianus states that Julian longed
for revenge on the Persians and that a certain desire for
combat and glory also played a role in his decision to go
to war.[60]
LIFE
1.7
Tomb
der Procopius and Sebastianus, set o east into the Persian interior, ordering the destruction of the eet.[72] This
proved to be a hasty decision, for they were on the wrong
side of the Tigris with no clear means of retreat and the
Persians had begun to harass them from a distance, burning any food in the Romans path. A second council
of war on 16 June 363 decided that the best course of
action was to lead the army back to the safety of Roman borders, not through Mesopotamia, but northward
to Corduene.[75][76]
1.6.3
Death
7
buried outside Tarsus, though it was later removed to
Constantinople.[80]
In 364, Libanius stated that Julian was assassinated by a
Christian who was one of his own soldiers;[81] this charge
is not corroborated by Ammianus Marcellinus or other
contemporary historians. John Malalas reports that the
supposed assassination was commanded by Basil of Caesarea.[82] Fourteen years later, Libanius said that Julian
was killed by a Saracen (Lakhmid) and this may have
been conrmed by Julians doctor Oribasius who, having
examined the wound, said that it was from a spear used
by a group of Lakhmid auxiliaries in Persian service.[83]
Later Christian historians propagated the tradition that
Julian was killed by Saint Mercurius.[84] Julian was succeeded by the short-lived Emperor Jovian who reestablished Christianitys privileged position throughout the
Empire.
1.7 Tomb
As he had requested, Julians body was buried in Tarsus.
It lay in a tomb outside the city, across a road from that
of Maximinus Daia.[86]
However, chronicler Zonaras says that at some later
date his body was exhumed and reburied in or near the
Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople, where
Constantine and the rest of his family lay.[87] His sarcophagus is listed as standing in a stoa there by Constantine
Porphyrogenitus.[88] The church was demolished by the
Ottoman Turks after the fall of Constantinople in 1453.
Today a sarcophagus of porphyry, identied as Julians,
stands in the grounds of the Archaeological Museum in
Istanbul.
Porphyry sarcophagi outside the Istanbul Archaeological Museum. Julians is the left-hand one.
2
2.1
Beliefs
Julians personal religion was both pagan and philosophical; he viewed the traditional myths as allegories, in which
the ancient gods were aspects of a philosophical divinity.
The chief surviving sources are his works To King Helios
and To the Mother of the Gods, which were written as
panegyrics, not theological treatises.
While there are clear resemblances to other forms of
Late Antique religion, it is controversial as to which variety it is most similar to. He learned theurgy from
Maximus of Ephesus, a student of Iamblichus;[89] his
system bears some resemblance to the Neoplatonism of
Plotinus; Polymnia Athanassiadi has brought new attention to his relations with Mithraism, although whether
he was initiated into it remains debatable; and certain aspects of his thought (such as his reorganization
of paganism under High Priests, and his fundamental
monotheism) may show Christian inuence. Some of
these potential sources have not come down to us, and
all of them inuenced each other, which adds to the
diculties.[90]
After gaining the purple, Julian started a religious reformation of the state, which was intended to restore the lost
strength of the Roman state. He supported the restoration of Hellenistic polytheism as the state religion. His
laws tended to target wealthy and educated Christians,
and his aim was not to destroy Christianity but to drive
According to one theory (that of G.W. Bowersock in the religion out of the governing classes of the empire
particular), Julians paganism was highly eccentric and much as Buddhism was driven back into the lower
atypical because it was heavily inuenced by an esoteric classes by a revived Confucian mandarinate in 13th cenapproach to Platonic philosophy sometimes identied as tury China.[96]
theurgy and also Neoplatonism. Others (Rowland Smith, He restored pagan temples which had been conscated
in particular) have argued that Julians philosophical per- since Constantines time, or simply appropriated by
spective was nothing unusual for a cultured pagan of wealthy citizens; he repealed the stipends that Constanhis time, and, at any rate, that Julians paganism was not tine had awarded to Christian bishops, and removed their
limited to philosophy alone, and that he was deeply de- other privileges, including a right to be consulted on apvoted to the same gods and goddesses as other pagans of pointments and to act as private courts. He also reversed
his day.
some favors that had previously been given to Christians.
Because of his Neoplatonist background Julian accepted
the creation of humanity as described in Platos Timaeus.
Julian writes, when Zeus was setting all things in order there fell from him drops of sacred blood, and from
2.2
On 4 February 362, Julian promulgated an edict to guarantee freedom of religion. This edict proclaimed that all
the religions were equal before the law, and that the Roman Empire had to return to its original religious eclecticism, according to which the Roman state did not impose
any religion on its provinces. Practically however, it had
as its purpose the restoration of paganism at the expense
of Christianity.
9
tian schools which at that time and later used ancient
Greek literature in their teachings in their eort to present
the Christian religion as being superior to paganism. The
edict was also a severe nancial blow, because it deprived
Christian scholars, tutors and teachers of many students.
In his Tolerance Edict of 362, Julian decreed the reopening of pagan temples, the restitution of conscated temple
properties, and the return from exile of dissident Christian bishops. The latter was an instance of tolerance of
dierent religious views, but it may also have been seen
as an attempt by Julian to foster schisms and divisions
between dierent Christian sects, since conict between
rival Christian sects was quite erce.[99]
His care in the institution of a pagan hierarchy in opposition to that of the Christians was due to his wish to create
a society in which every aspect of the life of the citizens
was to be connected, through layers of intermediate levels, to the consolidated gure of the Emperor the nal provider for all the needs of his people. Within this
project, there was no place for a parallel institution, such
as the Christian hierarchy or Christian charity.[100]
2.2.1 Paganisms shift under Julian
During Julians brief reign from 361-363 CE, his popularity among the people and the army indicated that he might
have brought paganism back to the fore of Roman public
and private life.[101] In fact, during his lifetime, neither
pagan nor Christian ideology reigned supreme, and the
greatest thinkers of the day argued about the merits and
rationality of each religion.[102] Most importantly for the
Coptic icon showing Saint Mercurius killing Julian. According pagan cause, though, Rome was still a predominantly pato a tradition, Saint Basil (an old school-mate of Julian) had
gan empire that had not wholly accepted Christianity.[103]
been imprisoned at the start of Julians Sassanid campaign. Basil
prayed to Mercurius to help him, and the saint appeared in a
vision to Basil, claiming to have speared Julian to death.
Even so, Julians short reign did not stem the tide of Christianity. The emperors ultimate failure can arguably be
attributed to the manifold religious traditions and deities
that paganism promulgated. Most pagans sought religious
aliations that were unique to their culture and people,
and they had internal divisions that prevented them from
creating any one pagan religion. Indeed, the term pagan was simply a convenient appellation for Christians to
lump together the believers of a system they opposed.[104]
In truth, there was no Roman religion, as modern observers would recognize it.[105] Instead, paganism came
from a system of observances that one historian has characterized as no more than a spongy mass of tolerance
and tradition.[105]
This system of tradition had already shifted dramatically
by the time Julian came to power; gone were the days
of massive sacrices honoring the gods. The communal
festivals that involved sacrice and feasting, which once
united communities, now tore them apartChristian
against pagan.[106] Civic leaders did not even have the
funds, much less the support, to hold religious festivals.
Julian found the nancial base that had supported these
ventures (sacred temple funds) had been seized by his un-
10
cle Constantine to support the Christian Church.[107] In
all, Julians short reign simply could not shift the feeling
of inertia that had swept across the Empire. Christians
had denounced sacrice, stripped temples of their funds,
and cut priests and magistrates o from the social prestige
and nancial benets accompanying leading pagan positions in the past. Leading politicians and civic leaders
had little motivation to rock the boat by reviving pagan
festivals. Instead, they chose to adopt the middle ground
by having ceremonies and mass entertainment that were
religiously neutral.[108]
After witnessing the reign of two emperors bent on supporting the Church and stamping out paganism, it is understandable that pagans simply did not embrace Julians
idea of proclaiming their devotion to polytheism and their
rejection of Christianity. Many chose to adopt a practical approach and not support Julians public reforms actively for fear of a Christian revival. However, this apathetic attitude forced the emperor to shift central aspects
of pagan worship. Julians attempts to reinvigorate the
people shifted the focus of paganism from a system of
tradition to a religion with some of the same characteristics that he opposed in Christianity.[109] For example, Julian attempted to introduce a tighter organization for the
priesthood, with greater qualications of character and
service. Classical paganism simply did not accept this
idea of priests as model citizens. Priests were elites with
social prestige and nancial power who organized festivals and helped pay for them.[107] Yet Julians attempt to
impose moral strictness on the civic position of priesthood only made paganism more in tune with Christian
morality, drawing it further from paganisms system of
tradition.
ANCESTRY
11
Works
The religious works contain involved philosophical speculations, and the panegyrics to Constantius are formulaic
and elaborate in style.
The Misopogon (or Beard Hater) is a light-hearted account of his clash with the inhabitants of Antioch after he
was mocked for his beard and generally scruy appearance for an Emperor. The Caesars is a humorous tale
of a contest between some of the most notable Roman
Emperors: Julius Caesar, Augustus, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Constantine, and also interestingly Alexander the
Great. This was a satiric attack upon the recent Constantine, whose worth, both as a Christian and as the leader
of the Roman Empire, Julian severely questions.
One of the most important of his lost works is his Against
the Galileans, intended to refute the Christian religion.
The only parts of this work which survive are those excerpted by Cyril of Alexandria, who gives extracts from
the three rst books in his refutation of Julian, Contra
Julianum. These extracts do not give an adequate idea
of the work: Cyril confesses that he had not ventured to
copy several of the weightiest arguments.
These have been edited and translated several times since
the Renaissance, most often separately; but all are translated in the Loeb Classical Library edition of 1913, edited
by Wilmer Cave Wright.
In ction
In 1847, the controversial German theologian David
Friedrich Strauss published in Mannheim the pamphlet Der Romantiker auf dem Thron der Csaren
(A Romantic on the Throne of the Caesars), in
which Julian was satirised as an unworldly dreamer,
a man who turned nostalgia for the ancients into
a way of life and whose eyes were closed to the
pressing needs of the present. In fact, this was a
veiled criticism of the contemporary King Frederick
William IV of Prussia, known for his romantic
dreams of restoring the supposed glories of feudal
Medieval society.[131]
Julians life inspired the play Emperor and Galilean
by Henrik Ibsen.
Julians life and reign were the subject of the novel
The Death of the Gods (Julian the Apostate) (1895)
6 See also
Libri tres contra Galileos
Anbar, the ancient town of Perisabora destroyed by
Julian in 363.
Diodore of Tarsus
Itineraries of the Roman emperors, 337361
12
that the kind Eusebia of Julians panegyric is a literary creation and that she was doing the bidding of her husband
in bringing Julian around to doing what Constantius had
asked of him. See especially p.597.
[16] David S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180395,
p.499.
[17] Most sources give the town as Sens, which is well into the
interior of Gaul. See John F. Drinkwater, The Alamanni
and Rome 213496, OUP Oxford 2007, p.220.
[18] Cambridge Ancient History, v.13, p.49.
[19] David S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180395,
p.501.
[20] David S. Potter, p.501.
[21] Cambridge Ancient History, v.13, pp.5051.
[22] Ammianus says that there were 35,000 Alamanni, Res
Gestae, 16.12.26, though this gure is now thought to be
an overestimate see David S. Potter, p.501.
[23] D. Woods, On the 'Standard-Bearers at Strasbourg:
Libanius, or. 18.5866, Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, Vol.
50, Fasc. 4 (August, 1997), p. 479.
[24] David S. Potter, pp.501502.
[25] Cambridge Ancient History, v.13, p.51.
[26] Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 16.12.27, 38, 55
[27] Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 16.12.6465
[28] John F. Drinkwater, The Alamanni and Rome 213496,
pp.240241.
[29] Athanassiadi, p.69.
[30] grammation: cf. Zosimus, Historia Nova, 3.9, commented by Veyne, L'Empire Grco-Romain, p.45
[31] Julian, Letter to the Athenians, 282C.
[32] Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 20.4.12
[33] Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 20.10.12
13
[69] Dodgeon & Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the
Persian Wars, p.203.
[71] Dodgeon & Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the
Persian Wars, p.204.
[76] Dodgeon & Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the
Persian Wars, p.205.
14
8 SOURCES
which is to the north, lies a cylindrically-shaped sarcoph- [112] St. John Chrysostom, The Cult of the Saints (select homiagus, in which lies the cursed and wretched body of the
lies and letters), Wendy Mayer & Bronwen Neil, eds., St.
apostate Julian, porphyry or Roman in colour. 44 AnVladimirs Seminary Press (2006).
other sarcophagus, porphyry, or Roman, in which lies the
[113] Quoted in : Schmidt, Charles (1889). The Social Results
body of Jovian, who ruled after Julian.
of Early Christianity (2 ed.). Wm. Isbister. p. 328. Re[89] The emperors study of Iamblichus and of theurgy are a
trieved 2013-02-09.
source of criticism from his primary chronicler, Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.13.68 and 25.2.5
[114] Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 23.1.23.
[90] Tougher, Shaun (2007). Julian the Apostate. Edinburgh [115] See Julian and the Jews 361363 CE (Fordham UniverUniversity Press. p. 27, 58f. ISBN 9780748618873.
sity, The Jesuit University of New York) and Julian the
Apostate and the Holy Temple.
[91] Julian, Letter to a Priest, 292. Transl. W.C. Wright,
v.2, p.307.
[116] A Psychoanalytic History of the Jews, Avner Falk
[92] As above. Wright, v.2, p.305.
[96] Brown, Peter, The World of Late Antiquity, W. W. Norton, [121] Athanassiadi, p.90.
New York, 1971, p. 93.
[122] Athanassiadi, p.131.
[97] Julian, Epistulae, 52.436A .
[98] See Theourgia-Demiourgia John P Anton.
[99] Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.5.4.
8 Sources
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, Libri XV-XXV
(books 1525). See J.C. Rolfe, Ammianus Marcellinus, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.,
1935/1985. 3 Volumes.
15
Ammianus Marcellinus, The Roman History of Ammianus Marcellinus During the Reigns of the Emperors Constantius, Julian, Jovianus, Valentinian,
and Valens. Translated by C. D. Yonge. Full text
at Internet Archive at https://archive.org/stream/
theromanhistoryo28587gut/28587-0.txt. Gutenberg etext# 28587.
Julian the emperor: containing Gregory Nazianzens
two Invectives and Libanius Monody : with Julians
extant theosophical works., Translated by C.W.
King. George Bell and Sons, London, 1888. At the
Internet Archive
Claudius Mamertinus, "Gratiarum actio Mamertini
de consulato suo Iuliano Imperatori", Panegyrici Latini, panegyric delivered in Constantinople in 362,
also as a speech of thanks at his assumption of the
oce of consul of that year
Gregory Nazianzen, Orations, "First Invective
Against Julian", "Second Invective Against Julian".
Both transl. C.W. King, 1888.
Libanius, Monody Funeral Oration for Julian the
Apostate. Transl. C.W. King, 1888.
Further reading
Roberts, Walter E., and Michael DiMaio, Julian the
Apostate (360363 A.D.)", De Imperatoribus Romanis (2002)
Athanassiadi, Polymnia. Julian. An Intellectual Biography Routledge, London, 1992. ISBN 0-41507763-X
Bowersock, Glen Warren. Julian the Apostate. London, 1978. ISBN 0-674-48881-4
Browning, Robert. The Emperor Julian, London,
1975.
Dodgeon, Michael H. & Samuel N.C. Lieu, The
Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars AD
226363, Routledge, London, 1991. ISBN 0-20342534-0
Drinkwater, John F., The Alamanni and Rome 213
496 (Caracalla to Clovis), OUP Oxford 2007. ISBN
0-19-929568-9
Gardner, Alice, Julian Philosopher and Emperor and the Last Struggle of Paganism Against
Christianity, G.P. Putnams Son, London, 1895.
ISBN 0-404-58262-1 / ISBN 978-0-404-582623. Downloadable at https://archive.org/details/
julianphilosophe00gard.
10 External links
Laws of Julian. Two laws by Constantius II, while
Julian was Caesar.
16
Imperial Laws and Letters Involving Religion, some
of which are by Julian relating to Christianity.
A 4th century chalcedony portrait of Julian, Saint
Petersburg, The State Hermitage Museum.
Julians Spin Doctor: The Persian Mutiny, Article
by Adam J. Bravo.
Rowland Smiths Julians Gods, Review by
Thomas Banchich.
Excerpt from by Adrian Murdoch, The Last Pagan
at the California Literary Review.
The Julian Society. A society of pagans that admires
Julian.
THE EMPEROR JULIAN, PAGANISM AND
CHRISTIANITY., In BTM Format.
Julian the Apostate why he was important, and his
place in world history
10
EXTERNAL LINKS
17
11
11.1
11.2
Images
18
11
11.3
Content license