Soybean Oil

13
Soybean Oil
Earl G. Hammond, Lawrence A. Johnson, Caiping Su,
Tong Wang, and Pamela J. White
Iowa State University
Ames, Iowa
1. INTRODUCTION
The amounts of soybeans and total vegetable oil crops have been rising for a
number of years. World production of soybeans in 2003 was estimated to be
184.49 million MT out of 317.89 million MT total for vegetable oil crops, making
soybeans the worlds largest oilseed crop, rivaled only by palm oil (1). The 2003
crop of soybeans was expected to yield 29.85 million MT of soybean oil out of a
total of 91.79 million MT of vegetable oil worldwide. The U.S. production of
soybean oil was estimated at 8.59 million MT for 2002, of which 7.86 million
MT was consumed domestically. During 20022003, Brazil produced 4.90 million
MT and Argentina 4.12 million MT of soybean oil (2). The U.S. price of crude
soybean oil has varied from $0.24/kg to $0.62/kg over the past 5 years with the
lower prices being more recent (1).
Soybeans owe their dominance of the oilseed market to the value of their protein,
which is much greater than that of other oilseeds. Of the oilseed meals produced in
2003, 129.58 million MT out of a total of 185.69 milllion MT was soybean meal
(1). Of the money made on extracting soybeans, the meal accounted for between
51% and 76% of the total in the last 10 years. Soybean oil of typical composition
performs well as a salad oil, but it is usually hydrogenated for use as a margarine
stock or frying oil. Soybean oils stability to oxidation also is limited by its content
Baileys Industrial Oil and Fat Products, Sixth Edition, Six Volume Set.
Edited by Fereidoon Shahidi. Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
577
578
SOYBEAN OIL
of linolenic acid. Recent decades have witnessed numerous attempts to manipulate

the fatty acid composition of soybean oil to help it compete better in various uses,
but the cost of growing, segregating, and testing special varieties and resistance to
genetically modified oils have limited the appeal of these altered varieties.
2. COMPOSITION OF SOYBEANS
Table 1 shows the average composition of soybean seed (oil, protein, and some
amino acids) grown in the United States during recent years (3). Aside from varietal
differences, the composition is affected by various geographic/environmental factors. According to Hurburgh (5), oil is much more variable than protein from yearto-year. States most distant from the center of the Corn Belt (probably those with
the greatest weather extremes) experience the most variability in composition.
Table 2 lists some of the environmental and cultivation practices that have an
TABLE 1. Typical Composition (wt% ! std. dev.)

of Soybeans (dry weight basis) (3).
Protein
Lysine
Methionine
Cysteine
Tryptophane
Threonine
Oil
Ash
Carbohydrate
40.69 ! 0.51
2.56 ! 0.11
0.57 ! 0.03
0.72 ! 0.06
0.52 ! 0.05
1.54 ! 0.07
21.38 ! 0.64
4.56 ! 0.34 (4)
29.4 ! 3.29 (4)
TABLE 2. Soybean Protein and Oil Responses to Various

Environmental and Cultivation Practices (3).
Variable
High temperatures
Early season drought
Late season drought
Early frost/cold temperature
Additional soil nitrogen
Increased fertility (P,S)
Late planting
Insect defoliation
Insect depodding
Rhizobium inoculation
a
b
Protein
Oil
? inconclusive; increase; $ decrease.

Oil is reduced because of refining loss to remove chlorophyll.
COMPOSITION OF SOYBEANS
579
observable effect on soybean protein and oil percentages. Maestri et al. (6) grew
soybean cultivars in several regions of Argentina and concluded that the protein
and oil contents were positively correlated with altitude. Protein was negatively correlated with latitude and precipitation, and oil was negatively correlated with temperature and precipitation. Oil content in soybeans tends to be negatively correlated
with protein, but breeding soybeans for high protein while maintaining oil content
has been a priority of the U.S. soybean producers, and some progress has been
achieved (7, 8). The variety Prolina reportedly produces 22.7% oil and 45.5% protein on a dry weight basis. There also has been interest in reducing the oligosaccharides that cause flatulence and reduce the digestibility and nutritive value of
soybeans.
Isoflavones are minor constituents of soybeans whose consumption is believed to
have beneficial effects (911). The benefits of isoflavones have encouraged the
direct consumption of soy protein in the United States. The concentration of
isoflavones changes with variety and growing conditions and has been reported
to be 1.22.5 mg/g in U.S. beans (9), 0.52.3 mg/g in Korean beans (10), and
0.23.5 mg/g in Japanese beans (11).
Table 3 shows the typical composition of the lipid phase of soybeans. Triacylglycerols are the primary component. The 3.7% phospholipids content in the soy
beans is higher than that usually found in hexane-extracted oil, which is typically
TABLE 3. Typical Composition of Crude Soybean Oil.

Component
Triacylglycerol
Phospholipids
Unsaponifable matter (1315)
Sterolsc (16)
Campesterol
Stigmasterol
-Sitosterol
!5-Avenasterol (17)
!7-stigmasterol (17)
!7-avenasterol (17)
Tocopherols (16)
Alpha
Beta
Gamma
Delta
Hydrocarbons (14, 15)
Free fatty acids (18)
Trace metals (18)
Iron
Copper
a
Std. Dev.
a
94.4
3.7b
1.31.6
0.236
0.059
0.054
0.123
0.005
0.005
0.002
0.123
0.0093
0.0018
0.0834
0.029
0.38
0.30.7
ppm
13
0.030.05
1.4
1.2 (12)
0.053
0.018
0.013
0.027
0.040
0.0044
0.0028
0.036
0.010
By difference.
Based on 23 varieties chosen to represent a wide fatty acid composition.
c
Based on 13 varieties chosen to represent a wide range of composition.
b
580
SOYBEAN OIL
1.852.75% (19). Of the unsaponifiable matter of soybean oil, typically about

1.45% of the oil, 16% is sterols, 8.5% is tocopherols, and 26% is hydrocarbons.
The remaining 50% of the unsaponifiable matter consists of other minor and unidentified products. The sterols are about 52% -sitosterol, 25% campesterol, and
23% stigmasterol. Maestrl et al. (4) reported similar proportions on the three major
sterols but also reported 5.4% ! 0.82 of !5-avenasterol, 3.8% ! 0.76 of !7stigmasterol, 1.3% ! 0.42 of !7-avenasterol, and traces of cholesterol in the total
sterols. The tocopherols are about 7.6% a, 1.5% b, 67.8% g, and 23.6% d. There is
considerable variation among plant varieties in the amounts and proportions of
molecular species of sterols and tocopherols (4, 16, 20). Vlahakis and Hazebroeck
(21) also have investigated the effects of planting locations and temperature on the
sterol and total tocopherol contents of a number of soybean varieties. They found
that growth temperature can cause as much as a 2.5-fold difference in sterol
content, with higher temperatures favoring higher amounts of sterols, increasing
the campesterol/-sitosterol ratio and decreasing total tocopherols. McCord et al.
(22) examined a number of soybean lines with low and normal contents of linoleate.
The low-linolenate lines averaged about 6% lower in tocopherol than the highlinolenate lines, but some reduced-linolenate lines were not significantly different
from normal-linolenate lines in tocopherols. The a- and g-tocopherols tend to be
concentrated in the soybean germ, whereas d-tocopherol is concentrated in the
endosperm (23). The hydrocarbon fraction of soybeans consists of n-hydrocarbons
of chain length 14 to 33 plus squalene and small amounts of hexahydrofarnesylacetone (14, 15). The squalene content is reported to be about 0.014% of the oil.
There seems to be considerable variation in the distribution of the hydrocarbon
chain lengths with plant variety, judging from the two examples in the literature.
Free fatty acids vary considerably with the age and soundness of the beans
but are seldom lower than the 0.1% of the crude oil (18). Damaged beans can
contain 18% free fatty acid as well as elevated iron and copper, 37 ppm and
0.080.18 ppm, respectively.
Refined oil usually retains little phospholipid, but damaged beans can have a significant content of phosphatidic acid, and the amount of iron in the oil is related to
the amount of phosphorus (24). During deodorization, considerable amounts of
sterol and tocopherol may be removed from the oil. The proportion removed
depends on deodorization conditions, but a 30% to 40% decrease is not unusual
(25). Much of the hydrocarbons and squalene are lost to the deodorizer distillate
as well. Free fatty acids in fully refined oil are required to be <0.05% and unsaponifiable matter <1.5% (26).
Table 4 shows the percentages and standard deviations of the methyl esters of 21
typical refined soybean oil samples. This composition is typical of most presently
commercial soybean varieties. The typical composition probably has been selected
through plant breeding because it is associated with good yield and other important
agronomic properties. It has been possible to change the composition of soybean oil
considerably, and Table 4 also shows the ranges of percentages that have been
reported for each methyl ester. Many of the changes in composition can be achieved
without great losses in yield or oil content, but lines with high or low palmitate
581
TABLE 4. The Averages and Standard Deviations of Methyl Esters from Typical Soybean
Oils and the Range Reported for each Methyl Ester.
Methyl Ester
Myristate
Palmitate
Palmitoleate
Stearate
Oleate
Linoleate
Linolenate
Arachidate
Gondoate
Behenate
Lignocerate
Furanoid IIb
Furanoid IIIc
Saponification Value
Iodine Value
Typical Value %a (27)

0.04 ! 0.5 (27)
10.57 ! 0.43 (27)
0.02 ! 0.04 (27)
4.09 ! 0.34 (27)
22.98 ! 2.01 (27)
54.51 ! 1.54 (27)
7.23 ! 0.78 (27)
0.33 ! 0.14 (27)
0.18 (28)
0.25 ! 0.20 (27)
0.1 (29)
0.014 ! 0.0086 (30)
0.015 ! 0.0076 (30)
190.4 (31, 32)
132.7(31, 32)
Range Achieved %
trace0.03 (4)
3.226.4 (33, 34)
trace0.7 (29)
2.632.6 (33, 35)
8.679.0 (36, 37)
35.264.8 (3537)
1.719.0 (38, 39)
trace0.7 (28)
trace0.6 (4)
trace1.0 (4)
0.00330.0290 (30)
0.00840.0272 (30)
188.5201.6 (31, 32)
114.0138.5 (31, 32)
Based on 21 commercial samples.

10,13-epoxy-11,12-dimethyloctadeca-10,12-dienoate.
c
12,15-epoxy-13,14-dimethyloctadeca-12,14-dienoate.
b
percentages tend to have reduced oil contents (33, 40, 41). Lines with high stearate
percentages suffer from low yields and sporadically from poor germination. Wang
et al. (42) tested lines with elevated palmitate or stearate in a number of tests of
germination and seedling vigor at three temperatures and found that, although
the high-saturate seed did well in these tests, vigor was negatively correlated
with saturate percentage. Most of the changes reported in Table 4 were attained
by traditional plant breeding or use of mutagenic agents. The high-oleic mutant
is an exception and was attained by direct genetic manipulation (37). High-oleate
lines developed by traditional plant breeding have been reported, but their oleate
percentage varies widely with growth environment, which limits their commercial
value (38).
The fatty acid composition of soybean oil changes considerably with maturity
and with seed oil deposition (15, 35, 43, 44). In typical soybean triacylglycerols,
the palmitate and linolenate tend to decrease with maturity, whereas linoleate
increases. Oleate tends to increase to a maximum and then decline slightly. Soybeans selected for atypical fatty acid compositions show quite different patterns
of change with maturity from typical soybeans.
Seitz (31) and Wesolowski (32) measured the saponification and iodine values of
a number of samples from various geographic locations, and their ranges and typical values are shown in Table 4.
Harp and Hammond (45) explored the stereospecific distribution of acyl groups
on the three positions of the glycerol molecule for soybean triacylglycerols with a
wide range in fatty acid composition. They found that the amount of an acyl group
582
SOYBEAN OIL
on a particular position was linearly related to the amount of that acyl group in the
whole triacylglycerol. At low concentrations of palmitate, stearate, oleate, and
linoleate in the total triacylglycerols, the amounts on the sn-1 > sn-3, but the
reverse was true at higher total concentrations. Palmitate and stearate were confined
to the sn-1 and sn-3 positions, whereas the oleate concentration was similar on all
three positions. Linoleate concentrations at the sn-2 position were generally greater
than those at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions, but the amount of linoleate on the sn-2
position seemed to be strongly and negatively correlated with the amounts of saturates on the sn-1 and sn-3 positions. Plots of linolenate concentrations at particular
positions versus the concentrations in the whole triacylglycerol showed considerably more scatter than plots for the other acyl groups, but they generally showed
the amount of linolenate on sn-2 > sn-1 > sn-3. The saturate percentages also
seemed to influence the amounts of linolenate on the sn-2 position positively and
on the sn-3 position negatively. Table 5 shows the stereospecific distribution of typical soybean triacylglycerols.
Theoretically, stereospecific data can be used to predict the acylglycerol structure using the 1-random-2-random-3-random distribution theory (47), if one
assumes the fatty acid composition of the three glycerol positions are individually
controlled but that the combinations of the three positions are random. However,
the change in fatty acid composition with maturity, described in the previous
paragraph, shows that the triacylglycerol composition is unlikely to be truly random
in the combination of the three glycerol positions. In addition, soybeans from the
same plant or pod can have slightly different acyl group compositions, so pooled oil
from many seeds and plants is unlikely to be exactly random in its glycerol position
combinations. Thus, such a calculation can lead only to approximate compositions.
Neff et al. (48, 49) partially separated the triacylglycerols of soybean oils
with a wide range of fatty acid compositions using high-performance liquid
TABLE 5. Stereospecific Distribution of Acyl Groups in the Triacylglycerols, Phosphatidylcholine, Phosphatidylethanolamine, and Phosphatidylinositol of a Typical Soybean
(45, 46).
Compound/Acyl group
Triacylglycerols
sn-1
sn-2
sn-3
Phosphatidylcholine
sn-1
sn-2
Phosphatidylethanolamine
sn-1
sn-2
Phosphatidylinositol
sn-1
sn-2
16:0
18:0
18:1
18:2
18:3
11.8
19.3
2.9
14.9
11.2
16.0
4.1
16.0
28.5
3.5
22.2
45.1
4.6
4.6
7.5
0.8
6.4
11.9
22.6
3.7
8.3
17.1
2.4
19.3
35.2
3.4
29.4
25.4
27.9
34.8
8.6
7.3
9.9
6.8
5.0
8.7
6.1
5.3
5.9
47.1
39.6
61.1
38.9
58.6
38.3
71.1
57.3
42.4
73.8
43.4
17.1
70.9
7.2
7.8
7.4
5.0
9.9
6.0
11.2
11.7
7.1
11.7
9.3
2.4
15.3
583
chromatography, and their results are shown in Table 6. These data show how the
amounts of the triacylglycerol species change with fatty acid composition.
The primary phosphatides of soybean oil are phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphotidylinositol, which generally make up 55.3%, 26.3%,
and 18.4% of the total phosphatides, respectively (50). The stereospecific distribution of the acyl groups in these phospholipids for a typical soybean lipid is shown in
Table 5. In all the phospholipids, the saturated acyl groups are concentrated in the
TABLE 6. Acyl and Triacylglycerol Composition in mol% of Soybean Oils Having a Wide
Range of Fatty Acyl Compositions (48, 49).
Acyl group
Palmitate (P)
Stearate (S)
Oleate (O)
Linoleate (L)
Linolenate (Ln)
Triacylglycerol Species
LnLL
LnLnO
LnLnP
LLL
LnLO
LnLP
LLO
LnOO
LLP
LnOP
LnPP
LOO
LLS
LOP
PLP
OOO
LOS
POO
SLP
LnSS
POP
PPP
SOO
SLS
SOP
PPP
SOS
PSS
SSS
Sample Number
1
2
3
4
5
3.9
3.3
28.5
61.8
2.5
21.4
3.3
23.6
49.0
2.7
23.6
19.0
9.3
38.0
10.0
28.2
3.9
13.9
43.8
10.2
8.5
26.5
18.0
38.9
8.2
2.0
30.0
1.7
0.4
26.9
0.4
6.4
0.1
0.1
13.9
3.6
3.7
0.8
4.6
2.6
0.9
0.8
0.2
0.7
0.3
0.1
1.2
0.1
11.5
1.5
1.7
14.4
0.5
20.7
1.0
7.3
2.6
16.3
8.6
2.1
2.3
3.2
2.2
1.7
0.5
0.2
0.4
1.4
0.1
0.4
3.7
0.8
6.9
3.6
0.1
17.5
1.4
1.5
1.3
7.7
7.4
13.8
1.0
3.9
0.6
16.0
1.2
0.1
0.3
6.5
1.3
0.6
0.6
0.2
3.2
0.2
0.6
9.6
2.0
9.4
8.7
0.3
21.4
2.1
2.0
3.1
2.0
12.2
14.8
0.8
1.3
1.0
3.0
1.5
0.2
0.3
0.2
2.6
0.1
0.1
6.5
1.9
2.2
7.1
0.3
11.6
0.4
0.1
2.5
13.0
6.4
2.0
1.1
11.8
0.5
8.8
0.3
2.1
12.3
1.4
0.6
3.4
0.1
0.1
584
SOYBEAN OIL
sn-1 position and the unsaturated acyl groups, especially linoleate, on the sn-2 position. Phosphatidylinositol tends to be richest in palmitate and stearate, whereas
phosphatidylcholine has the least palmitate. Wang et al. (51) reported the stereospecific distribution of the acyl groups in the various phospholipids types and the
amounts of particular acyl combinations for soybean lipids with a wide variety
of fatty acid compositions. Some phosphatidic acid and lysophospholipids also
may be present as a result of hydrolysis of the phospholipids (52). The amounts
of the hydrolytic products usually increase with age and damage to the beans (53).
Soybeans also contain 170 ! 47 ppm of cerebrosides in which the sugar is glucose and the chief fatty acid is 2-hydroxy palmitic acid (54). Traces of ceramides
also are present. These are believed to play a role in cell signaling in the soybean
plant.
Crude soybean oil contains about 1.9 ppm of Vitamin K1 or phylloquinone (55).
This vitamin plays a role in blood coagulation and bone metabolism. During refining, some Vitamin K1 may be lost (56, 57), especially during deodorization. Hydrogenation of the fat converts some of the Vitamin K1 to 20 ,30 -dihydrovitamin K1 (58).
Wilson et al. (7, 8, 39, 59) have reviewed the genetic control of fatty acid biosynthesis in soybeans and discussed the advantages of soybean oil with special
compositions. Oil with reduced palmitate is available presently in a limited market.
The commercial introduction of low-linolenate soybeans has been inhibited by the
availability of corn oil, which has a composition like very low-linolenate soybean
oil. The price differential between these oils often is smaller than the costs of contract growing, segregating, and processing low-linolenate soybeans. High-oleate
soybean oil is stable under frying conditions, but this trait alters the flavor of the
fried products (60). The acceptance of high-oleate soybean oil also suffers from
public concern about the growth and consumption of plants produced by direct
genetic modification.
There are small amounts of two acyl groups containing furan rings in soybeans
(30). These oils are reported to be the sources of the odorous compound 3-methyl2,4-dione by photo-oxidation (61), but Kao et al. (62) were not able to find differences in flavor of photo-oxidized varieties with high and low content of these acyl
groups.
3. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOYBEAN OIL

The physical properties of fatty acids vary with their chain length, unsaturation, and
other substituents and change with temperature. Numerous attempts have been
made to develop equations that will predict these properties. Soybean oils properties should reflect its constituents and, especially, its fatty acid composition, and
physical properties have frequently been measured for typical soybean oils, but
there have been fewer measurements of soybean oils with modified fatty acid compositions.
Table 7 shows the values of physical properties of soybean oil of typical composition. Seitz (31) examined 77 samples of soybean oil from various parts of the
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOYBEAN OIL
585
TABLE 7. Some Physical Properties of Typical Soybean Oil.

Density 20% C
Specific Heat Capacity 20% C
Melting Point
Cloud Point
Pour Point
Heat of Combustion
Heat Transfer Coefficient
Surface Tension 30% C
Viscosity 20% C
Refractive Index nD20% C
Vapor Pressure
Heat of Vaporization
Electrical Resistivity 24% C
Dry
Water Saturated
Smoke Point
Flash Point
Fire Point
0.9165 to 0.9261 g/mL (31, 32) Decreases 0.000643 to

0.000668 g/mL%C (6367)
0.448 cal/g% C Increases 0.000616 cal/g% C (68)
0.6% C (35)
$9% C (69)
$12 to $16% C (69, 70)
9450-9388 cal/g (71)
9135 ! 91 cal/g (72)
269.7 watts/% K M2 at 180% C (73)
27.6 dyne/cm Decreases 0.077 dyne/cm% C (63, 64)
58.562.2 cP (31)
1.47331.4760 (32)
1m at 254% C (74)
44,200 cal/mol (74)
23.7 Tohm & cm (75)
7.25 Tohm & cm (75)
'245% C (76)
'324% C (76)
'360% C (76)
world over a seven-year period and reported densities at 20% C ranging from
0.9165 g/mL to 0.9210 g/mL. Wesolowski (32) examined the density of 53
Polish soybean oils at 19.9% C and reported values ranging from 0.9202 g/mL to
0.9165 g/mL. The following correlations of density and other variables were found:
with refractive index 0.62, with iodine value $0.64, with saponification value 0.34,
and with acid value 0.59. Yokota and Tachimori (77, 78) also reported a close
relation between density and iodine value. Halvorsen et al. (79) and Rodenbush
et al. (80) developed equations to predict the density of vegetable oils that took their
fatty acid compositions into account and predicted densities of soybean oils with
<0.1% error. The density of vegetable oils changes approximately linearly with
temperature, and Kravchenko et al. (65, 66) found the density decreased
0.000668 g/mL% C between 0% C and 100% C, whereas Alvarado (63, 64) found a
value 0.000643 between 20% C and 70% C, and Noureddini et al. (67) found
0.0006674 between 23.9% C and 110% C.
The densities of soybean oil-solvent mixtures at various temperatures are important for engineering calculations and have been reported for hexane, ethylene
dichloride, and tricholoroethylene at 25% C, 37.8% C, and 50% C (81); Skellysolve B
at $20% C, $10% C, 0% C, 10% C, 25% C, and 40% C (82); dichloromethane at 25% C (83);
and hexane at 25% C (84).
The specific heat capacity of soybean oil was measured by Clark et al. (85)
and varied from 0.448 cal/g% C to 0.666 cal/g% C between 1% C and 271% C. Specific
heat increased linearly with temperature at 0.00070 cal/g% C. Tochitani and Fujimoto (68) measured the specific heat capacity of soybean oil from about the
586
SOYBEAN OIL
approximate melting point to 150% C and found a linear increase that fit the following equation:
Sp: Heat Capacity in cal=g% C 0:4353 0:000616 T;
where T is the temperature in % C. Their data agreed closely with those of Clark et al.
(85) but were slightly higher than those reported by Kasprzycka-Guttman et al.
(86), who made measurements between 70% C and 140% C. Wang and Briggs (87)
estimated the heat capacities of soybean oils of various compositions based on
an equation by Morad et al. (88). They calculated that high-oleate oils should have
a slightly higher heat capacity and low-saturate oils a slightly lower heat capacity
than typical soybean oil, and the change with temperature should be 0.00057 cal/
g% C. Their equation agreed with their experimental values within !5%.
Miller et al. (73) determined the heat-transfer coefficient for soybean oil at frying temperatures and found that they varied from 261.3 watts/% KM2 to 276.2 watts/
%
KM2 between 170% C and 190% C, where M2 is square meters of surface.
The melting of natural fats and oils usually occurs over a considerable temperature range, and soybean oils typical melting range is below 0% C. The availability of
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at low temperatures has made information
on melting of soybean oil available, and interest in using vegetable oils as fuels has
also sparked measurements of their cloud and pour points. Table 8 (41) gives the
temperatures of onset, maximum, and end of melting for various types of soybean
oil. Table 7 gives the cloud and pour points of typical soybean oil. Wang and Briggs
(87) also gave DSC curves for the melting of high-oleate, low-saturate, and lowlinolenate soybean oil. Hagura and Suzuki (89, 90) used the change in electrical
capacitance of oil samples to obtain the melting range of soybean oil and found
the results agreed with those obtained by DSC.
Seitz (31) measured the viscosity at 20% C of 77 soybean oils from four
geographic locations, and the range of variation was 58.1cP to 62.2cP (Table 7).
Viscosity decreases with temperature, and the relation is not linear. Kinematic
values (viscosity/density) have been reported at 20% C and 80% C by Chioffi (91)
and by Miller et al. (73) at frying temperatures (170190% C); dynamic viscosities
have been reported between 0% C and 100% C by Kravchenko et al. (65, 66), between
23.9% C and 110% C by Nourreddini et al. (67), between 20% C and 70% C by Alvarado
TABLE 8. The Onset, Maximum Rate, and Termination of Melting Temperatures of

Soybean Oil with Various Fatty Acid Compositions % (41).
Class
Onset
Typical
18:0 "
16:0 & 18:0 "
16:0 "
16:0 #
$39.6
$13.7
$17.1
$21.8
$46.1
Maximum Termination
$9.4
18.3
16.8
8.4
$13.8
$0.6
20.7
18.9
11.6
$8.1
16:0
18:0
18:1
18:2
18:3
11.4
10.1
24.6
28.0
3.4
4.2
22.8
18.7
4.7
2.6
26.1
17.3
8.6
13.8
18.0
50.3
42.2
37.5
42.1
64.8
7.9
7.7
10.7
11.4
11.2
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOYBEAN OIL
587
(63, 64), and between 1% C and 60% C by Arissen (92). Dahlberg et al. (93) were able
to predict the viscosity of soybean and other oils from the Fourier transform infrared spectra. Rodenbush et al. (80) calculated the viscosity of oils by relating viscosity to a function they termed the reduced density, which they could calculate from
the fatty acid composition.
Several authors have fit their viscosity-temperature data to equations (6367, 87,
94). Some of these come with a claim of theoretical significance, but all have
enough variables to fit the data well. One of Alavarados equations (63, 64) is
ln m ln m0 E=RT;
where E/R was 3262 and ln m0 was $6.997 for soybean oil. Wang and Briggs (87)
reported graphically the change of viscosity with temperature from 10% C to 90% C
for soybeans with altered fatty acid compositions. They found the viscosity of higholeic soybean oil higher and low-saturated soybean oil lower than that of typical
soybean oil.
Miller et al. (73) determined the kinematic viscosity of soybean oil at temperatures of 170% C, 180% C, and 190% C, and obtained values of 3.151 cm2/sec,
2.880 cm2/sec, and 2.614 cm2/sec, respectively. The viscosities of soybean oil-hexane (Skellysolve B) mixtures at temperatures between $20% C and 40% C were investigated by Magne et al. (84). Ibemesi and Igwe (95) examined the reduced viscosity
(viscosity/concentration) of solutions of soybean oil in toluene, xylene, cyclohexane, and tetrahydrofuran. They found an anomalous reduced viscosity increase at
concentrations below about 0.12 g/mL that they attributed to clustering of the fat
molecules in the solvent. Erhan et al. (96) determined the kinematic viscosity of
blends of typical soybean oil with polyalphaolefins and isobutyrl oleate and
high-oleic soybean oil with isotrideceyl adipate and mineral oil to achieve viscosities suitable for lubricants.
The surface tension of soybean oil at 20 70% C was reported by Alvarado (63, 64)
and is given in Table 7. The surface tension decreased linearly with temperature at
0.077 dyne/cm% C.
Wesolowski (32) examined the refractive index of 53 samples of soybean oil
from Poland, and the range is given in Table 7. Sietz (31) reported average values
for samples from several geographic locations, and these values (1.47471.4752)
fall near the mean of Weslowskis samples. Refractive index depends on chain
length and unsaturation (97) and often has been used to follow hydrogenation
(98102). Refractive index also has been used to follow autoxidation (103). A closely related quantity, the dielectric capacitance also has been used to assess the
quality of frying oil (104). Perry et al. (74) measured the vapor pressure of soybean
oil at various temperatures and found that the data fit the equation:
log P 18:3 $ 9650=T;
where P is the pressure in microns and T is in K. The also estimated the heat of
vaporization (Table 7).
588
SOYBEAN OIL
Tomoto and Kusano (105, 106) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide,
nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen in soybean oil between 0.2 atm and 1 atm and
between 30% C and 70% C. The Bunsen coefficient (volume of gas at standard conditions / volume of soybean oil at 760 mm) at 30% C was 1.018 for carbon dioxide,
0.086 for nitrogen, and 0.048 for hydrogen. The Bunsen coefficient of oxygen at
30% C was 0.141 but increased with temperature, probably because of oxidation
during the measurement. The Bunsen coefficient decreases linearly to zero at
zero gas pressure. The natural logarithm of the Bunsen coefficient versus 1/T in
K is linear, and the constant is the heat of solution of the gases divided by the
gas constant. These heats of solution are $2.42 kcal/mol for carbon dioxide,
$2.58 kcal/mol for nitrogen, and $3.86 kcal/mol for hydrogen. From this relation,
one can calculate the solubility at any temperature and pressure in the range of the
study. Comparison of the values for soybean oil with olive and linseed oil suggested
that the Bunsen coefficients are influenced by the degree of unsaturation of the oil.
The viscosity of soybean oil decreased with the amount of carbon dioxide
dissolved, but dissolved nitrogen slightly increased the viscosity.
Loncin (107) reviewed the data on the solubility of water in fats and oils. For
typical soybean oil, the solubility of water was 0.11% by weight at 22% C and
rose to 0.19% at 60% C. The solubility of water decreases with fatty acid chain
length and increases with the percentage of free fatty acids.
The vapor pressures of soybean oil-hexane mixtures between 75% C and 120% C
were reported (108, 109), and similar data for soybean oil with commercial hexanes
was reported by Smith (110). Arnold and Breuklander (83) measured the boiling
point of dichloroethylene-soybean oil mixtures and found the log (V.P.) was a linear
relation of the mole fraction of oil. Kusano (111, 112) measured the vapor pressure
(P) of soybean oil-solvent mixtures that included hexane, benzene, and carbon tetrachloride between 20% C and 50% C and found linear relations between log P and 1/
T. Anikin et al. (113, 114) measured the vapor pressure of mixtures of soybean oil
with the khladon 113 (trichlorotrifluoroethane) between 30% C and 100% C. Aeberhard and Spekuljak (115, 116) measured the vapor pressure of hexane in hexanesoybean oil mixtures and found the vapor pressure at 25% C could be predicted by
the equation
P 9128x $ 0:2807x2 0:004695x3 ;
where P is the vapor pressure in Torr and x is the weight percentage of solvent in the
mixture.
Tekin and Hammond (75) measured the resistivity of soybean oil and found it
decreased logarithmically with temperature from about 100 Tohm &cm at $5% C to
0.251 Tohm &cm at 100% C. The resistivity was decreased by saturating the oil with
water and the addition of oleic acid, a-tocopherols, b-carotene, phospholipids, and
monoacylglycerol.
The smoke, flash, and fire points of soybean oil have been determined by the
Cleveland Cup method and show considerable variation. Dickhart (117) reported
a smoke point of 138% C while Detwiler and Markley (76) reported 241250% C.
589
GRADING
Detwiler and Markley (76) found that the smoke point varied considerably with the
degree of refining, especially the removal of free fatty acids, and also with the mode
of oil extraction. Yen et al. (118) found a smoke point of 191% C, which was raised
several degrees by the addition of phenolic antioxidants. The flash point of soybean
oil, the temperature at which vapors coming from the oil will catch fire from an
ignition source, were reported as 304% C (117), 326331% C (76), 174% C (69),
318% C (70), and 320% C (119). The low value reported by Ali et al. (69) was
obtained by using a Pensky-Martens closed tester and ASTM method 093-90.
The flash points of hexane-soybean oil mixtures were determined and correlated
with headspace gas chromatography data (120).
Fire points or self-ignition temperatures (SITs) for soybean oil by using the
Cleveland Cup method, which uses a brass cup, were reported to be 356363% C
(76) and 400% C using a stainless-steel cup apparatus (71). The burning rate of soybean oil was 4.3 g/m2sec, flame height 129 mm, and irradiance 0.153 kW/m2 (71).
Kowalski (119) studied the self-ignition temperature in a differential scanning
calorimeter heated at rates of 4090% C/min and under 8002800 kPa of oxygen
pressure and found values of 260290% C for soybean oil. He found the addition
of copper wire to the sample decreased the self-ignition temperature by 515% C.
The self-ignition temperature was inversely related to oxygen pressure. Wakakura
(121, 122) used a scanning calorimeter at an oxygen pressure of 980 kPa with
soybean oil spread on glass wool and in bulk and found self-ignition temperatures
of 147% C and 376% C, respectively.
4. GRADING
To facilitate soybean marketing, the U.S. Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS)
established grading standards for soybeans (Table 9) (123), and the FGIS website
(124) provides much more detailed information than can be provided here (124).
TABLE 9. Official Grades and Grade Requirements of the Federal Grain Inspection
Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Grade
U.S. No. 1
U.S. No. 2
U.S. No. 3
U.S. No. 4
U.S. Sample Grade
Minimum
Test
Weight
per Bushel
(lbs)
56.0
54.0
52.0
49.0
Maximum Limits
Damaged Kernels
Soybeans
Heat
Foreign
of Other
Damaged
Total
Material
Splits
Colors
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
0.2
0.5
1.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
8.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1.0
2.0
5.0
10.0
590
SOYBEAN OIL
Soybeans are classified into two classes based on color, Yellow Soybeans and
Mixed Soybeans. There are four numerical grades (U.S. No. 1, 2, 3, and 4) and a
U.S. Sample Grade for each class. Sample Grade designates those soybeans that do
not meet the requirements of any of the numerical grades. Six factors are considered in assigning a grade designation: test weight, amounts of beans that are
damaged or heat damaged, and amounts of foreign material, splits, and soybeans
of other colors. Although important to processors because they affect yields and
qualities of finished products, the FGIS official grades do not consider moisture,
protein, and oil contents, but these factors may be specified on contracts in some
markets. Near infrared transmission (NIT) spectroscopy is widely used to rapidly
estimate (within less than 2 min after sampling and without any sample preparation
required) moisture, protein, and oil contents. Brumm and Hurburgh (125) developed a computer program to estimate the process value of soybeans based on their
composition and selling prices of oil and meal. In some cases, price premiums are
offered for soybeans high in oil content or high in both oil and protein contents, and
details of the program are available on the Internet (126).
Beans low in test weight may contain less oil. Test weight is the weight in
pounds of grain per Winchester bushel (35.2 L) and is determined by using an Official Test Weight Apparatus and a 11/4-quart (1.18 L) sample before removing foreign material. All other grading factors are measured as percentages of total sample
weight. Foreign material, which is other grains, weed seeds, pods, leaves, stems,
etc., reduces oil and protein contents and storage life. Foreign material is determined by sieving a sample. All materials, including soybeans and soybean pieces
that readily pass through an 8/64-inch (3.2-mm) round-hole sieve and all material
other than soybeans remaining on the sieve after sieving are considered to be foreign matter. Split soybeans, which result from mechanical damage during handling
and over drying, reduce storage life and oil yield, and increase losses during oil
refining. Splits (typically the cotyledon splits into two halves) and broken beans
(more than two pieces) increase free fatty acid (FFA), phosphatides, iron, and peroxide contents of the crude oil. Heat-damaged beans have high-FFA content and
darken the oil color, both changes in oil quality increase refining loss (127). Splits
are defined as beans with more than one-fourth of the bean removed and are not
damaged. Splits are determined by sieving a portion of the grain after removing
the foreign material. Damaged beans reduce the storage life of the beans and oil
yield in processing, cause the oil to be dark-colored and poor in flavor, and increase
losses during oil refining (128). Soybeans and soybean pieces that are badly
damaged by the ground, weather, frost, heat, insects (stinkbug-stung kernels are
considered at one-fourth the actual percentage), mould, or sprouting are considered
to be damaged. Damaged beams are determined by hand picking after removing
foreign material. Soybeans of other colors may affect oil color by contributing
undesirable pigments and are those beans that are green, black, brown, or have multiple colors.
Almost 27 million MT of soybeans were exported from the United States during
the 2002 crop year, of which 4.8% was U.S. No. 1, 94.6% was U.S. No. 2, 0.4% was
U.S. No. 3, and 0.1% was U.S. No. 4. By comparison, Brazilian soybeans are
RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS
591
typically slightly higher in oil content (6-yr average of 1.2% higher oil content),
foreign matter, damage, free fatty acid, and moisture contents and lower in test
weight (129).
5. RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS

Soybeans are economically important because of their high qualities and quantities
of oil and protein. From one bushel of soybeans (60 lb, 27.2 kg), crushers typically
recover 11.1 lb (5.0 kg) of crude oil, 44.3 lb (20.1 kg) of meal (48% protein), and
3.3 lb (1.5 kg) of hulls with the remainder being shrinkage. According to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture statistics, the oil accounts for about one-third of the
returns in processing soybeans with the protein in the form of meal accounting
for the remainder (130). Over the past five years, the meal (48% protein) has ranged
in yearly average prices of $153289/MT (6.913.1 cents/lb), whereas the oil has
ranged $311569/MT (14.125.8 cents/lb). Hulls have limited outlets, mostly in
cattle feeds, and sell for about $66/MT (3 cents/lb) and return $4.04/MT of
soybeans ($0.11/bu). During the same period, the average price of soybeans in
the United States ranged from $167270/MT ($4.547.35/bu) and crushing
margins, the difference in soybean price and crusher returns, averaged $23.1
56.2/MT ($0.631.53/bu).
Farmers often store their soybeans in metal bins on the farm or in concrete silos
at local elevators for a fee. This allows farmers to sell their crop later in the year
when prices usually increase. Soybeans should be stored at less than 13% moisture
to assure safe storage and preservation of the quality. This moisture content is
usually achieved by drying in the field before harvesting. Lower moisture contents
increase the tendency of soybeans to split during handling to form two half pieces
of cotyledon. Higher moisture content during storage can lead to mold damage or
heating damage due to seed respiration (131). These forms of damage can affect
soybean grade and oil quantity and quality when processed.
The processing of soybeans has been described in more detail elsewhere than
can be done here (132134). Oil is recovered today by either mechanical means
or through the use of organic solvents. In the preindustrial revolution period, soybeans were merely pressed with lever or animal-driven screw-operated batch
presses. Around the turn of the Twentieth Century, when soybeans became a viable
commercial crop in the United States, steam-powered hydraulic batch presses were
used. Today, electric-powered continuous screw-presses, often referred to as
expellers (but this is a trademarked name for screw presses manufactured by one
supplier), or continuous countercurrent solvent extractors are used.
In either case, soybeans are pretreated prior to oil recovery to either make oil
recovery easier or more complete, or to increase the value of the defatted solids
known as meal. Usually, soybeans arriving from the farm or elevator are cleaned
to remove stems, leaves, pods, broken grain, dirt, stones, and extraneous seeds
using shaker screens and aspirators. It is usually advantageous to remove the major
portion of the hulls because they are low in oil (<1%) and protein. The hulls of
592
SOYBEAN OIL
soybeans account for 78% of the weight. Dehulling reduces the material going
downstream into costly operations and increases the protein content of the meal.
Dehulling raises the meal protein content by about four percentage points (i.e.,
from 44% for undehulled solvent-extracted soybean meal to 4849%) and reduces
fiber content (from 7.0% to <3.3%). The formulated feed market prefers high-protein and low-fiber meal, especially in manufacturing swine and poultry feeds. The
hulls are relatively easy to remove from soybeans compared with those of other oilseeds, simply cracking the bean into 68 pieces to free the hull using corrugated
roller mills and aspirating the hulls away from the oil- and protein-rich cotyledon,
known as meat, is effective. Consistent bean size is important to proper cracking
and drought-caused shrinking and wrinkling make dehulling much more difficult
and less efficient (135). Often, the aspirated hulls go to gravity tables to scavange
any small meats aspirated with the hulls. Usually, cleaned soybeans are conditioned
prior to cracking to improve dehulling efficiency by heating and drying the beans to
about 9.5% moisture and allowing the moisture to equilibrate for 17 days within
the bean to loosen the hull. Various hot-dehulling schemes have also been devised to
increase dehulling efficiency, and are often used in northern latitudes where the protein contents of soybeans, and, consequently, meal protein levels, may be lower and
specified protein levels cannot be achieved without more complete hull removal.
In the 1930s, soybeans were widely processed by screw pressing after cooking
the seed. A typical process diagram for screw pressing soybeans is shown in
Figure 1 and a plant photo is shown in Figure 2. The beans are heated and the
oil is squeezed out. The pressed oil usually goes to settling basins to reduce fine
Soybeans
CLEANING
Foreign Matter
CRACKING
optional)
ASPIRATING
Meats
DRYING
OR COOKING
Foots
SCREW PRESSING
Cake
SETTLING
POLISH FILTERING
MEAL GRINDING
MEAL COOLING
Foots
Partially Defatted
Meal
Crude Oil
Figure 1. Process flow diagram for screw pressing soybeans.
Hulls
593
Figure 2. Photograph inside a modern soybean screw-press plant (courtesy of West Central
Cooperative, Ralston, IA). (This figure is available in full color at http://www.mrw.interscience.
wiley.com/biofp.)
solids content, with the fines being recycled to the screw press. The oil then goes to
polish filters before being placed into storage for shipment to a refinery. Today, in
the United States, there are less than a half-dozen traditional screw press plants
(excluding extrusion-expelling, which will be discussed later). Only one screwpress plant crushing more than 800 MT/day exists, and it is located in Ralston,
IA. Under optimum processing, the meal can contain as low as 46% residual
oil, which contributes metabolizable energy to livestock consuming screw-pressed
meal. As a result of the heat treatment during cooking and screw pressing,
increased rumen-bypass characteristics improves feed efficiency in high producing
dairy cattle. Thereby, the meal may sell for premium prices over solvent-extracted
meal when adequate numbers of dairy animals are located nearby. As this meal is
used to feed ruminants, the beans are not usually dehulled.
Direct solvent extraction is the most widely used oil-recovery method for
soybeans, but it also requires considerable capital and large scale to compete. In
actual practice, solvent extraction is used to crush over 98% of the soybean processed in the United States. Process flow diagrams are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
Most soybean solvent-extraction plants process more than 2,500 MT/day (Figure 5),
and some are capable of processing as much as 5,000 MT/day (especially newly
constructed plants in Brazil). Direct-solvent-extraction plants smaller than 1,000
MT/day have difficulty competing in the United States. At various times, soybeans
have been extracted commercially with petroleum distillate fractions that resemble
gasoline, acetone, carbon disulfide, ethanol, trichloroethylene, and even water,
594
SOYBEAN OIL
Soybeans
Foreign Matter
CLEANING
CRACKING
(
ASPIRATING
optional)
GRAVITY
TABLING
Hulls
Meats
Cracked Meats
CONDITIONING
FLAKING
Flakes
EVAPORATING
Miscella
(oil and solvent)
STRIPPING
Crude Oil
Solvent
EXPANDING
optional)
Collets
SOLVENT
EXTRACTING
Marc
(solids and solvent)
(
optional)
FLASH
DESOLVENTIZING
Solvent
White Flakes
GRINDING
MEAL
DESOLVENTIZING
TOASTING
Enzyme-active
Flour
COOLING
GRINDING
Toasted Meal
Figure 3. Process flow diagram for direct solvent-extracting soybeans.
which is not a true solvent but facilitates oil separation by creaming. A petroleum
distillate containing a mixture of hexane isomers having a typical boiling range of
65% C to 71% C is the only solvent used today. These products typically contain 45%
to 70% n-hexane. n-Hexane is considered a neurotoxin in the United States and has
proven toxicity at high concentrations. The U.S. Occupational and Safety Administration has set the maximum workplace exposure level at 500 ppm and a timeweighted average not to exceed 50 ppm (136). In recent years, there has been considerable interest by the soybean industry in alternative solvents to hexanes because
of increasing environmental and safety concerns. Alternative solvent technologies
have been extensively reviewed (137139).
595
Figure 4. Depiction of equipment and process flow diagram for direct solvent-extracting soybeans (courtesy of French Oil Mill Machinery Co., Piqua, OH).
596
SOYBEAN OIL
Figure 5. Photograph of a modern soybean-extraction plant (courtesy of Bunge North America,

Council Bluffs, IA). (This figure is available in full color at http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.
com/biofp.)
Cleaned and dehulled soybeans are conditioned by heating to 74% C to soften the
meat prior to flaking using smooth roller mills. Proper cracking and conditioning
are important to achieve the desired cell distortion or cell rupture that is necessary
for efficient extraction and to prevent production of excessive amounts of fine meat
particles that impede proper flaking or extraction. Highly distorted cells are desired
(140) so that cell walls and pseudo-membranes around oil bodies are sufficiently
ruptured, and the oil can be easily contacted by the solvent and leached out. Soybeans are typically flaked to 0.25 mm (1012 thousandths of an inch) to achieve the
desired distortion (141). The flakes may be conveyed directly to the extractor or to
an expander. In recent years, expanders have been adopted to achieve increased cell
distortion and to produce an easily extractable porous pellet (collets) that is more
dense than flaked soybeans. Thereby, more mass of material can be placed into the
fixed volume of the extractor, the oil is more quickly extracted reducing extraction
time, and the solvent drains more completely reducing the load on meal desolventizing equipment. All of these factors increase plant throughput capacity (142144).
Plants vary in the amounts of flakes that are expanded, typically about one-third of
the flake production, but in a few cases, all flakes are expanded. Although there is
not universal agreement, expanding may also improve oil quality by quickly inactivating phospholipases, which cause phospholipids to become nonhydratable. In
the authors opinion, adoption of expanders is the most significant change in solvent
extraction during the past quarter century.
597
Figure 6. Photograph inside a modern direct solvent-extraction plant processing soybeans

(courtesy of Crown Iron Works, Minneapolis, MN). (This figure is available in full color at
http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/biofp.)
Soybeans are exclusively extracted in the percolation mode as opposed to the

immersion mode used during early days of soybean extraction. A photograph of
a modern chain extractor is shown in Figure 6. The percolating solvent flows by
gravity through the bed. Solvent is always passed countercurrent to the transport
of meal solids. There are several different types of extractors, including chain
and basket types, and shallow- and deep-bed types. Soybean flakes or collets are
extracted for 30 45 min in six or more stages.
The best quality oil, low in non-triacylglycerole components, is extracted first,
and with more exhaustive extraction, poorer quality oil is recovered. Thus, at lowresidual oil levels, the proportions of phosphatides, free fatty acid, and pigments
that are extracted are greater and so is the refining loss. However, the current industry practice strives for the most complete extraction possible, typically in the range
or 0.5% to 1.25% residual oil. For this reason, exhaustive laboratory devices, such
as a Soxhlet extractor with ground material, are not very useful when trying to
achieve oil that is representative of that produced by a commercial extractor,
and, for best results, the solvent should be percolated in stages through a bed of
flaked material.
The full miscella (oil-rich extract) containing 2030% oil drains from the freshest flaked or expanded meats and is sent to solvent-recovery operations. The operations include two-stage evaporators and an oil stripper. The oil content exiting the
first-stage evaporator is 6570% oil and is heated with vapors from the desolventizer-toaster. After the second-stage evaporator, the oil content is 90 95% oil. The oil
stripper uses steam-injection vapor, high heat, and high vacuum to remove the
598
SOYBEAN OIL
solvent to less than 0.2% remaining in the oil. The temperature of the oil in the
stripper should not exceed 115% C to prevent scorching the oil and causing dark color. Flash point determination is an easy method to assure that the solvent-evaporation equipment is operating as it should and the flash point should exceed 150% C.
All evaporated solvent is recycled to the extractor. The oil should be sent to a
vacuum dryer to remove any residual stripping steam condensate and the dry oil
immediately cooled prior to placing into storage.
As a result of natural antioxidants (i.e., phoshpahtides, tocopherols), crude soybean oil can be stored for a long time in large tanks provided the oil is first cooled to
ambient temperature and has limited access to air. The crude oil should be low in
moisture to prevent hydrolysis. Gummy deposits of phosphatides may spontaneously
form in the bottoms of storage tanks and tank cars used for shipping crude oil.
There has been much speculation about using supercritical carbon dioxide
because using this technology eliminates safety issues as carbon dioxide is not
flammable and the oil is better quality (139), but no such plants have been constructed to process soybeans. This is due to the absence of a commercially feasible
means of continuously feeding soybean flakes into a high-pressure vessel and
removing the spent flakes. Recently, one company has developed a screw press in
which supercritical carbon dioxide is injected into the barrel. This equipment has been
successfully used to produce soybean meal with lower residual oil contents than typically produced by screw pressing and with little heat denaturation of the protein.
The spent flakes or collets are sent to a meal desolventizer-toaster (DT). Newer
equipment incorporates countercurrent steam usage. The Schumacher-type desolventizer/toaster/dryer/cooler has become widely accepted in the soybean industry,
and, with this equipment, residual levels of hexane should be less that 500 ppm.
Both indirect and direct steam heating are used. Steam vapor and a modest vacuum
carry away the solvent vapors for condensing. Condensed solvent is recycled to the
extractor after separating water from the hexane. A desolventizer-toaster is a series
of trays through which the meal flows. Soybean meal is unique in that it must be
toasted to inactivate protease inhibitors (especially trypsin inhibitor) that would
reduce feed efficiency if not denatured and inactivated. Urease activity is used as
a measure of adequate heating. The toasted meal typically has low-protein solubility as measured by protein dispersibility index (typically 45 PDI). The meal is then
sent to a dryer-cooler to reduce the meal temperature for safe storage. The moisture
content should be about 12% and the residual fat content less than 1.5%. The free
extractable oil after extraction is less than 1.0%, but heating during desolventizingtoasting frees some bound fat that previously was not extractable with hexane.
Overtoasting may reduce digestibility and nutritional value of the meal. The meal
is then ground with a hammer mill to produce meal with uniform particle size.
If dehulling is employed, as is typical for plants in the United States, the meal
will contain around 48% protein. Additionally, dehulling reduces the fiber content
of the meal by over 50%. In some plants, a portion of the soybean hulls may be
added back to the meal prior to grinding to adjust and precisely control meal protein
content. Livestock feeders are concerned about having uniform protein and fiber
contents in order to formulate minimum-cost feeds for maximum feed efficiency.
599
The meal is generally ground so that 95% passes a U.S. 10-mesh screen and a maximum of 3% to 6% passes through a U.S. 80-mesh screen.
Some plants divert part of their spent flake production away from a desolventizer-toaster to a flash desolventizer, which is designed to produce white flakes with
high-protein solubility (PDI 70 90). White flakes are used as the starting material
for producing protein isolates or concentrates, which contain >90% and 65% protein, respectively, and are used as food ingredients.
Some soybean extraction plants also degum their oil before shipping to centralized refineries. There is not sufficient market to make it profitable to recover all of
the soybean phosphatides and market them as soy lecithin. The gums are added
back to the meal in the toaster to evaporate the water. The gums contribute to
the metabolizable energy content of the meal and the soybean crusher can get
meal prices for crude phosphatides.
Quality standards and trading rules for solvent-extracted soybean meal and oil
are designated by the National Oilseed Processors Association and are available
at a website (145). Soybean products are remarkably uniform in their quality characteristics compared with alternative sources of oil and meal.
Recently, a third process, known as extruding-expelling (or Express Systems as
trademarked by the equipment manufacturer), was developed (Figures 7 and 8)
(146, 147). In this process, a dry extruder, which generates heat solely through friction of the beans in the extruder, replaces steam generating and steam heating the
beans. The heated beans then go to a screw press and the rest of the process is
the same as in screw pressing. The plants typically process 550 MT/day.
Soybeans
CLEANING
Foreign Matter
CRACKING
optional)
ASPIRATING
Meats
EXTRUDING
Foots
EXPELLING
(screw pressing)
Cake
SETTLING
POLISH FILTERING
MEAL GRINDING
MEAL COOLING
Foots
Partially Defatted
Meal
Crude Oil
Figure 7. Process flow diagram for extruding-expelling soybeans.
Hulls
600
SOYBEAN OIL
Figure 8. Photograph inside a modern extruding-expelling plant processing soybeans. (This

figure is available in full color at http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/biofp.)
Approximately 70 extruding-expelling plants have been built over the past 10 years
for crushing soybeans. Usually, these plants are farmer-owned and provide meal to
nearby livestock feeders (148). The oil is sold to the large oil refineries, often at a
discount despite the oil being of excellent or superior quality because high costs are
incurred in handling small lots of oil. These plants are ideally suited to identitypreserved processing. There are niche opportunities for these plants to market
certified organic or nonGMO soybean oil, for which there is a lucrative market
in some countries. Other opportunities reside with genetically enhanced soybean
oils and meals, such as low-linolenate, high- and low-saturates, and high-oleate
oils. This process has even been proposed for producing soybean products during
interplanetary exploration (149). NASA plans to grow soybean in space because
some missions, such as Mars exploration, cannot be supported without growing
food in space.
6. QUALITIES OF SOYBEAN OILS AND MEALS EXTRACTED

BY DIFFERENT METHODS
Wang and Johnson (150) compared the qualities of soybean oils and meals obtained
by the three processing methods. Soybean oil and meal samples were collected
at three times within a one-year period from 13 extruding-expelling plants, eight
QUALITIES OF SOYBEAN OILS AND MEALS EXTRACTED
601
TABLE 10. Quality Characteristics of Soybean Meals Produced by Different Oil-Extraction Processes.
Property
Processing Method
Solvent Extraction
Screw-Pressing
Extruding-Expelling
Moisture, %
Residual oil1, %
Protein1, %
Urease, !pH
Protein solubility in KOH, %
Protein dispersibility index
Rumen-bypass protein, %
Hunter L color
Trypsin inhibitor, mg/g
Trypsin inhibitor, TIU/g
1
11.65
1.2
48.8
0.04
89.1
44.5
36.0
69.1
5.46
5280
11.03
6.3
43.2
0.03
61.6
10.6
48.1
51.5
0.3
2000
6.94
7.2
42.5
0.07
88.1
18.1
37.6
65.8
5.52
12,250
Reported at 12% moisture basis.
solvent-extraction plants, and one continuous screw-press plant. Their results are
shown in Tables 10 and 11. Solvent extraction is by far the most efficient method
of recovering oil from soybeans, typically only about 1.2% residual oil is left in the
meal. Screw-pressing is slightly more efficient in recovering oil than is extrudingexpelling, leaving 6.3% oil in screw-pressed meal compared with a mean of 7.2%
for extruded-expelled meals. Most solvent-extraction plants dehull soybeans to produce soybean meal with 48% or more protein and carefully control the moisture
content at 12%. Solvent-extracted soybean meal is highly uniform, often much
more so than either screw-pressed or extruded-expelled meal. The high-protein
and low-fiber contents of solvent-extracted soybean meal are desired when feeding
poultry and swine, which consume 46% and 25% of the soybean meal produced,
respectively. Most extrusion-expelling and screw-press plants have not invested
in dehulling equipment, as their meal generally goes into feeding ruminant animals.
Protein dispersibility indices, a measure of protein denaturation that is used in
the food industry, are lower for extruded-expelled and screw-pressed meals. Protein
TABLE 11. Quality Characteristics of Soybean Oils Recovered by Different Processes.
Property
FFA, %
Phosphorus, ppm
Tocopherols, ppm
Moisture, %
PV, meq/kg
AOM stability, h
Lovibond color, red
Processing Method
Solvent Extraction
Screw-Pressing
Extruding-Expelling
0.31
277
1365
0.08
0.96
39.8
11.1
0.33
463
1217
0.05
1.76
36.2
17.5
0.21
75
1257
0.08
1.73
23.9
10.2
602
SOYBEAN OIL
solubilities in potassium hydroxide solution, a measure of protein denaturation and

an indicator of overcooking that is used in the feed industry, are similar for
extruded-expelled and solvent-extracted meals, but higher than that of screwpressed meal (62%). Rumen-bypass protein values are higher for the screw-pressed
meals, indicating that more protein escapes the rumen and is not converted to
microbial protein that has a lower nutritive value than the original soybean protein.
All meals examined by Wang and Johnson (151), regardless of the processing method employed, had low-trypsin-inhibitor activity, which is important to proper protein digestion. Soybean trypsin inhibitors, especially in unheated soybeans, can
inhibit the protease enzymes trypsin and chymotrypsin, reducing protein hydrolysis
during digestion. There are two trypsin inhibitors in soybeans, Kunitz inhibitor and
Bowman-Birk inhibitor. The Kunitz inhibitor is relatively easily inactivated by
moist heat, comprises about 85% of the inhibitory activity, and acts only on trypsin;
the Bowman-Birk inhibitor is much more stable to heat (due to six disulfide cross
linkages) and acts on both trypsin and chymotrypsin. The activity of the enzyme
urease (easily measured as pH change) is often used as a quick and easy indicator
of adequate cooking. A valuable resource for characteristics of soybean meal is
http://www.stratsoy.uiuc.edu/epv/.
Oil properties vary considerably between different types of plants (Table 11) and
among plants of the same type and sampling times. The free fatty acid (FFA) content, a measure of hydrolytic degradation during seed storage and oil extraction, of
extruded-expelled oil is significantly lower than that of solvent-extracted oil, which
may be due to the rapid inactivation of lipases during extrusion. Screw-pressed
soybean oil typically contains 0.33% FFA, which is similar to that of typical solvent-extracted oil. The amounts of phospholipids in the oils after settling are much
lower in extruded-expelled oil (75 ppm phosphorus) than in solvent-extracted oil
(277 ppm phosphorus). Screw-pressed oil has much higher phospholipid content
(463 ppm phosphorus) than does solvent-extracted oil. The phospholipid in
extruded-expelled oil is readily hydratable and easy to settle, which are attributed
to the rapid heat inactivation of the phospholipases. The tocopherol contents of
crude extruded-expelled oils are slightly lower than those of crude solvent-extracted
oil.
Peroxide values (PVs), a measure of primary lipid oxidation products, are significantly higher for crude extruded-expelled oil than for crude solvent-extracted
oil, which is attributed to the high temperature used in extruding-expelling, the
long period typically allowed for oil cooling, or the often poor oil-storage conditions and longer storage times at extruding-expelling plants. Oxidative stability,
as measured by the Active Oxygen Method (AOM), of extruded-expelled oil is significantly lower than that of solvent-extracted oil, probably because of the higher
PV value and lower contents of phosphorus (phosphatides) and tocopherols in crude
extruded-expelled oil. The colors of extruded-expelled and solvent-extracted oils
are significantly different. Although solvent-extracted oil tends to be slightly darker
than extruded-expelled oil, screw-pressed oil is much darker in color than are the
other two types, probably because of the more severe heat treatment of the screwpressed oil before pressing.
SOY PROTEIN INGREDIENTS
603
7. SOY PROTEIN INGREDIENTS

Defatted soybean meal (white flakes) may be heated to produce a variety of solubility and enzyme-activity characteristics, ground and sized to produce grits or
flour, and used as a food ingredient in bakery products, soymilk, and meat products.
A historical accounting of the development of these products was published by
Johnson et al. (151, 152). Soy flour may be relecithinated or refatted with refined,
bleached, and deodorized oil to achieve desirable functional properties. Soy flour
can also be texturized by using an extruder to produce meat-like products called
TVP (texturized vegetable protein) that are often used to extend ground meat.
Enzyme-active soy flour is used in bread at 0.5% of the wheat flour. Lipoxygenase
in the soy flour bleaches the carotenoids of wheat flour to produce a whiter crumb
and improves dough-mixing properties. White flakes may be processed into soy
protein isolates or concentrates (132, 153). Soy protein is poorly soluble in water
at pH 4.5, the isoelectric point, and highly soluble at pH >8.0. These solubility
characteristics can be used to isolate or concentrate soy protein.
Untoasted and flash-desolventized meal in which the protein is undenatured and
highly soluble (>70 PDI and preferably >90 PDI) is the preferred starting material
in manufacturing soy protein isolates. Under some conditions, extruded-expelled
meal can be used, but the yield of soy isolate is reduced. The meal is ground in
water adjusted to pH 8.0 with sodium hydroxide and centrifuged to remove insoluble fiber. The soluble fraction is acidified to pH 4.5, and the protein precipitates.
The precipitated protein curd is separated from the soluble sugars by centrifuging.
The protein curd may be washed, neutralized, and spray-dried.
High protein solubility is not needed for protein concentrates and heating to
insolubilize the protein and facilitate extracting the solubles (mostly sugars) with
water is one way that has been used to prepare soy protein concentrates. Concentrates today, however, are normally made by extracting the sugars with either acid
(pH 4.5) or aqueous ethanol (6080%). Aqueous ethanol is most frequently used
because it produces the blandest product, but ethanol denatures the protein and
leaves the protein with reduced functional properties unless the product is refunctionalized by jet cooking (154, 155) or by homogenizing under alkaline conditions
(156). Soy protein concentrate must contain >65% protein on a dry basis.
The soybean storage proteins glycinin and b-conglycinin, which often are recognized in the older literature as 11S and 7S proteins, respectively, based on their
sedimentation during ultra centrifuging, comprise 6580% of the protein. Methods
have even been developed to separate soy protein into fractions rich in individual
proteins (157, 158). Some believe b-conglycinin has greater health benefits than
glycinin.
Soy protein isolates are used in dairy analogs (milk replacers and beverage powders), meat-pumping solutions, luncheon meats, and infant formulas, whereas soy
protein concentrates are used in dairy analogs (milk replacers, beverage powders,
cheeses, coffee whiteners, frozen desserts, whipped toppings), baked goods, and
meat products (156). These protein products are used for their functional properties
such as solubility, water absorption and binding, viscosity control, gelation,
604
SOYBEAN OIL
cohesion-adhesion, elasticity, emulsification, fat absorption and binding, foaming,

and color control. The solubility and thermal properties of these products were
recently compared by Lee et al. (159). Some products have high solubility even
though they were largely denatured.
Many health benefits have been attributed to soy protein products, either because
of the proteins or accompanying phytochemicals, such as isoflavones, saponins, etc.
There is a growing body of evidence that soy protein products may impact hypertension and heart disease, osteoporosis and bone health, and certain cancers. The
perception of such nutritional benefits is driving an increased interest by food companies in the incorporation of soy protein products. In October 1999, the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized a health claim for soy protein in cardiovascular disease. U.S. food labeling laws now permit a statement on the label that
Diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol that include 25 grams of soy protein a
day may reduce the risk of heart disease. One serving of (name of food) provides
(list number) grams of soy protein. The health claim allowance is reported in the
Federal Register (160) and is posted on the FDA website (161).
8. BASIC PROCESSING OPERATIONS

As discussed in the previous section on soybean oil composition and Table 11,
crude soybean oil can contain phospholipids, free fatty acids, lipid oxidation
products, and unsaponificable matter, which includes chlorophyll and carotenoid
pigments, tocopherols, sterols, and hydrocarbons. Some of these components negatively affect oil quality, and some may play positive roles in nutrition and functionality. The goal of oil refining is to remove the undesirable components so that a
bland, stable, and nutritious product can be obtained. The basic processing operations in oil refining are (1) degumming, (2) neutralization, (3) bleaching, (4) hydrogenation, (5) deodorization, and (6) winterization or crystallization. These steps are
outlined in a flow chart as shown in Figure 9.
8.1. Degumming
Crude soybean oil contains a relatively high concentration of phospholipids compared with other vegetable oils. Degumming is a process of removing these components from crude soybean oil to improve its physical stability and facilitate
further refining. Phospholipids can lead to dark-colored oils and they can also serve
as precursors of off-flavor (162) compounds. Free fatty acids, pigments, and other
impurities are also partially removed by degumming. Soybean oil can also be neutralized directly without degumming if gum or lecithin recovery is not desired. Conventional belief holds that the loss of neutral oil in refining crude oil by direct
neutralization is less than the combined losses of degumming and caustic refining
of the degummed oil.
The quality of crude soybean oil influences the efficacy of degumming. Phospholipids can exist in a hydratable form, which can be readily removed by addition
BASIC PROCESSING OPERATIONS
605
Crude Soybean Oil

FILTERING
Water
Foots
GUMS HYDRATING
Alkali
NEUTRALIZING
CENTRIFUGING
Water
VACUUM DRYING
GUMS DRYING
Moisture
Lecithin
Wash-water
(residual
soapstock)
Moisture
BLEACHING
FILTERING
Steam
Soapstock
(free fatty acids,
phosphatides)
WASHING
CENTRIFUGING
Bleaching
Earth
CENTRIFUGING
DEODORIZING
POLISH FILTERING
Spent Bleaching
Earth (color, residual
soapstock)
DISTILLATE CONDENSING
Deodorizer Distillate
(off-flavor compounds, minor
volatiles, free fatty acids)
Salad & Cooking Oils
Figure 9. Diagram of conventional soybean oil refining.
of water, or in a nonhydratable form, which cannot be easily hydrated and removed.

The nonhydratable phospholipids are considered to be the calcium and magnesium
salts of phosphatidic acids, which are formed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the original phospholipids. This degradation can result from seed damage during storage
and improper handling. List et al. (53) studied the factors promoting the formation
of nonhydratable phospholipids in soybeans and showed that they are promoted by
four interrelated factors: (1) moisture content of beans or flakes, (2) phospholipase
D activity, (3) heat applied to beans or flakes prior to and during extraction, and
(4) disruption of the cellular structure by cracking or flaking. These results suggest
that a nonhydratable-phosphatide formation can be minimized by control of the
moisture of beans or flakes entering the extraction process, inactivation of phospholipase D, and optimizing the temperature during conditioning of cracked beans or
flakes. Normal quality soybean oil from the conventional solvent extraction
contains about 90% hydratable and 10% nonhydratable phospholipids. Phosphoric
or citric acid can be used as a pretreatment to achieve more complete removal of
nonhydratable phospholipids, but their presence in the gum will darken it and
reduce its quality. The total phospholipid content in crude soybean oils ranges
from 1.85% to 2.75% (19) and partially depends on the seed preparation and extraction methods employed. Use of an expander or the Alcon process to cook the flakes
prior to extraction will increase total phospholipids content in the crude oil and the
phosphatidylcholine percentage in the gum (163).
606
SOYBEAN OIL
Degumming can be achieved in a batch or continuous fashion. In batch degumming, soft water at the same percentage as total phospholipid is added to oil heated
to 70% C and mixed thoroughly for 3060 min, followed by settling or centrifuging.
In continuous water degumming, heated oil is mixed with water by an in-line
proportioning and mixing system and the mixture is held in a retention vessel for
1530 min before centrifugation. The phosphorus content is typically lowered to
12170 ppm (164). A well-degummed soybean oil should contain less than
50 ppm of phosphorus, which is well below the 200 ppm level specified in the
National Oilseed Processors Association (165) trading rules for crude degummed
soybean oil. Degumming for physical refining, as opposed to alkali refining of soybean oil, requires more complete removal of the phospholipids to prevent darkening
during fatty acid distillation. For more complete phospholipid removal, several
modified degumming methods can be employed (166, 167).
Recently, polymeric ultrafiltration membranes were used for degumming crude
soybean oil and removing phospholipids from the crude oil/hexane miscella (168).
Crude soybean oil also can be de-acidified by methanol extraction of the free fatty
acids and the extract separated into fatty acids and solvent by a membrane filter
(169). A surfactant-aided membrane degumming also has been applied to crude
soybean oil, and the degummed oil contained 2058 ppm of phosphorus (170).
Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction was shown to be an effective means of
degumming (171). In this process, soybean oil countercurrently contacted supercritical carbon dioxide at 55 MPa and 75% C. The phosphorus content of the oil was
reduced from 620 ppm to less than 5 ppm. Ultrasonic degumming was also successfully used to reduce the gum content of soybean oil (172).
8.2. Neutralization
Neutralization is also referred to as de-acidification and alkali or caustic refining.
Neutralization is achieved by treating the soybean oil with aqueous alkaline solution (most commonly, sodium hydroxide) to neutralize the free fatty acids in a batch
or continuous system. The soap formed in the reaction also adsorbs natural pigments, the gum and mucilaginous substances not removed by degumming. Natural
settling or centrifugation is used to remove the soap. Crude soybean oil also can be
netralized directly without degumming. When this is practiced, the oil commonly is
pretreated with 3001000 ppm of 75% phosphoric acid to facilitate removal of
phospholipids. The percentage of excess sodium hydroxide solution required for
crude oil is higher than that for degummed oil (173).
The quality changes, such as lipid oxidation and reduction of tocopherols and
phytosteols during neutralization, are considerable compared with the other processing steps as shown by Wang and Johnson (174), and also as presented in Table 12.
The further phospholipid removal (below 2 ppm phosphorus) also reduces the oxidative stability of soybean oil (175) due to the antioxidant property of these phospholipids.
One of the new developments in neutralization is the use of silica-based adsorbent to remove the residual soap instead of using water washing. Water usage and
607
TABLE 12. Effect of processing on content of tocopherols, sterols, and squalene

in soybean oil (25).
Processing
Step
Tocopherols
ppm
% Loss
Crude
Degummed
Neutralized
Bleached
Deodorized
1132
1116
997
863
726
1.4
11.9
23.8
35.9
Sterols
Ppm
% Loss
3870
3730
3010
3050
2620
3.6
22.2
21.2
32.3
Squalene
ppm
% Loss
143
142
140
137
89
0.7
2.1
4.2
37.8
waste generation is greatly reduced by this practice. Sodium silicate also was used
as a mild neutralizing agent to refine specialty oils (176). Its agglomerating tendency allowed the removal of the soap by filtration, and its low alkalinity minimized saponification of neutral oil and loss of minor nutrients. Other adsorbents,
such as magnesium silicate, also were shown to be effective in reducing free fatty
acids, as well as reducing primary and secondary oxidation products in the treated
oil (175, 177).
Physical refining or steam refining is a process similar to steam deodorization.
Steam distillation is typically used for oil with a high free-fatty acid content to
reduce the refining loss, which would be significant if caustic refining was used.
Acid-aided degumming produces soybean oil with very low phosphorus content
and makes the distillation of free fatty acids possible. Nevertheless, the relatively
difficult task of removing sufficient phospholipids from soybean oil has prevented
extensive use of this technique in the United States. Physical refining, however, has
virtually replaced caustic refining of palm oil in Malaysia.
8.3. Bleaching
Bleaching is a process designed not only to remove the oxidation-inducing pigments such as chlorophylls, but more importantly to decompose the peroxides produced by oxidation into lower molecular weight carbonyl compounds that can be
removed by subsequent deodorization. Bleaching also removes other impurities
such as soap and metal ions. In soybean oil refining, color reduction occurs at
each step, nevertheless, the most significant reduction of chlorophylls occurs in
the bleaching step. Acid-activated bleaching clay is most effective in adsorbing
chlorophylls and decomposing peroxides, and it is commonly used for soybean
oil. The chlorophyll content in normal crude soybean oil (11.5 ppm) can be
reduced by 25% by alkali refining, and bleaching with acid earth further reduced
chlorophylls to 15 ppb (178) The subsequent hydrogenation and deodorization
remove or degrade red and yellow pigments more than chlorophyll, so incomplete
chlorophyll removal by bleaching will cause the refined oil to appear greenish. The
refined and bleached oil is particularly susceptible to oxidation and is less stable
than the crude, degummed, refined, or deodorized oils (178).
608
SOYBEAN OIL
The desired bleaching endpoint is typically zero peroxide, although a color specification is often used as an important measure. The amount of bleaching earth
should be adjusted based on the quality of oil to be bleached, and it usually ranges
from 0.3% to 0.6% for a typical soybean oil. Low contents of phosphorus (510
ppm P) and soap (1030 ppm) in the neutralized oil are essential to maximize
the bleaching effect. Successful bleaching can be achieved by atmospheric batch
bleaching, vacuum batch bleaching, or continuous vacuum bleaching at temperatures between 100% C and 120% C for 2030 min. More details of soybean oil bleaching are described by Erickson (179).
Recently, silica-based synthetic materials have been used in bleaching. The natural bleaching earth, fullers earth, a hydrated aluminum silicate, mostly has been
replaced by acid activated clays, which are sulfuric- or hydrochloric-acid-treated
bentonites or montmorillonites. Manufacturers continuously improve the quality
and develop new bleaching earths to meet the markets needs. Higher activity
and filterability are the main focuses of such development.
8.4. Hydrogenation
The high degree of unsaturation, particularly the relatively high content of linolenate, of soybean oil significantly limits its food applications because of low oxidative stability. Hydrogenation is used to improve oxidative stability as well as to
increase the melting temperature of soybean oil. A great proportion of soybean
oil is hydrogenated to produce cooking oil, bakery/confectionery fats, and shortening.
When oil is treated with hydrogen gas in the presence of a catalyst (typically
nickel) and under appropriate agitation and temperature conditions, it becomes
more saturated and forms a semisolid or plastic fat that is suitable for many food
applications. Selectivity is a term used to describe the relative reaction rate of the
fatty acids from the more unsaturated to the more saturated forms. Perfect selectivity would provide sequential elimination of linolenate, linoleate, and then oleate. To
completely hydrogenate linolenate while minimizing changes in the other acyl
groups, a high ratio of the reaction rates of linolenate to linoleate compared with
linoleate to oleate is desirable. Generally, selectivity increases with temperature and
catalyst concentration and with decreases in hydrogen pressure and agitation rate
(180). The effect of pressure on hydrogenation selectivity of soybean oil was
reported by List et al. (181), who found that the linoleate-containing triacylglycerols were reduced at a slower rates than the linolenate-containing triacylglycerols
under selective condition. At higher pressures (500 psi), the reaction was truly nonselective; whereas at 50 psi, the reaction became selective. Impurities in soybean
oil, such as phosphorus, oxidation products, carotene, and metal ions can poison
the catalyst and cause slower hydrogenation (182). A particular limitation with
nickel catalyst is its low selectivity for linolenate over linoleate, and copper-containing catalysts have greater selectivity for linolenate acid than the conventional
nickel catalysts (183). The use of copper catalyst can produce soybean oil that
has a low degree of hydrogenation (iodine value of 110115) but has less than
609
1% linolenate. However, copper catalysts are not as active as nickel catalysts; they
are also easily poisoned (184). Furthermore, any trace of residual copper in the fully
processed oil will promote lipid oxidation.
The most common tests for degree of hydrogenation are congeal point and the
iodine value as determined by refractive index. Refractive index is a valuable tool
for iodine values above 95, but when the oil is further hydrogenated, refractive
index becomes an inadequate measurement for melting prediction because
increased amount of trans-isomers results in harder oil than the refractive index
would indicate (185). For margarine or shortening, the solid fat index (SFI), as
determined by dilatometry, or solid fat content (SFC), determined by nuclear magnetic resonance, is the most appropriate method to measure the consistency of the
hydrogenated oil. These indices predict the workability and creaming ability at a
particular temperature.
Double-bond isomerization or trans-fatty acid formation is the most important
side-reaction that occurs during hydrogenation, and it has a strong impact on the
physical and possibly the nutritional properties of the products. Trans-double bonds
are thermodynamically a more favorable configuration than their cis-counterpart; so
trans-bonds are produced in significant quantities if the hydrogenation does not go
to completion. The trans-fatty acids have a much higher melting point than their
cis-isomers, therefore a fat product with considerable trans-acyl groups will have
an elevated melting point, which is desirable in shortening and margarine applications. A partially hydrogenated soybean oil can have at least 30 different one-, two-,
and three-double-bond isomers that will result in more than 4000 different triacylglycerol molecules. This complexity allows the production of a great variety of oils,
margarines, and shortenings that have a wide range of physical and functional properties. However, the established relationship between trans-fat consumption and
health has prompted research to minimize trans-double formation in fats and oils.
Hydrogenation of soybean oil may be carried out in a batch or a continuous system. In the United States, batch operations are typical. More comprehensive
reviews on hydrogenation and formulation can be found in Erickson and Erickson
(180), Hastert (186), and Kellens (187).
8.5. Deodorization
Deodorization is usually the last step in conventional oil processing. It is a steamstripping process in which good quality steam (13% of oil) generated from de-aerated and properly treated feed water is injected into soybean oil under high temperature (252266 % C) and high vacuum (<6 mm Hg) to decompose peroxides
and vaporize the free fatty acids and odorous compounds. Deodorization relies
on the large differences in volatility between the triacylglycerols and other undesirable components under certain conditions. The musty and earthy odor produced
from bleaching and the hydrogenation odor and flavor are effectively removed by
deodorization. The free fatty acids, typically ranging from 0.1% to 0.5% in neutralized oil and 0.5% to 5% in oil to be physically refined, are also reduced to below
0.03%, a value used as an indicator for deodorization efficiency. Zero peroxide
610
SOYBEAN OIL
value is another indicator for effective deodorization. Heat bleaching is achieved by

holding the oil for 1560 min at high temperature to ensure considerable decomposition of carotenoid pigments.
During the deodorization process, many desirable reactions take place, but some
undesirable reactions, such as lipid hydrolysis, polymerization, and isomerization,
also occur. Therefore, the deodorization temperature is carefully controlled to
achieve optimum quality of the finished soybean oil product. The effect of refining
condition on trans-fatty acid content in refined vegetable oils was investigated by
Okamoto et al. (188). Trans-fatty acid contents of deodorized oils increased with
prolonged exposure to high temperature, and trans-formation was higher in
oils containing greater proportions of polyunsaturates. The isomerization rate of
linolenate was 6.5- to 16.3-fold higher than that of linoleate in soybean oil. Kemeny
et al. (189) studied kinetics of the formation of trans-linoleic acid and translinolenic acid in vegetable oils deodorized at temperatures from 204230% C for
286 h. Their data can give good estimates of the trans-level of refined oils for
given deodorization conditions. Deodorization has also been modified to retain
more nutrients and prevent other undesirable reactions. Mathematical models
have been established describing the influence of different process parameters
such as time, temperature, steam rate, and pressure on tocopherol stripping, production of oxidized and polymeric triacylglycerols, and trans-fatty acid formation during physical refining of soybean oil (190). Tocopherol removal was mainly
influenced by processing temperature and steam rate, whereas oxidized and polymerized triacylglycerols were not significantly affected by any of the investigated
process parameters.
There are three types of deodorization operations. The batch process is the least
common because of its low efficiency and inconsistent product quality. The
semicontinuous and continuous deodorizers have improved processing efficiency.
There are several configurations of the continuous deodorizer, including the
single-shell cylindrical vessel type, the vertically stacked-tray type, and the thinfilm packed-column type. The thin-film system provides excellent fatty acid
stripping with minimum use of steam, but it does not achieve the desired heat
bleaching or effective deodorization because of its relatively short retention time.
A retention vessel held at high temperature has to be used after the column distillation to
achieve bleaching (191).
The overall oil quality change during refining of soybean oil was examined by
Jung et al. (178), and their results are shown in Table 13. A study of oxidative
TABLE 13. Effect of Processing Steps on Quality of Soybean Oil (178).
Refining Step
Crude
Degummed
Refined
Bleached
Deodorized
Phosphorus Iron
(ppm)
(ppm)
510
120
5
1
1
2.9
0.8
0.6
0.3
0.3
Chlorophyll
(ppm)
0.30
not available
0.23
0.08
0.00
Peroxide Value Tocopherol Free Fatty

(meq/kg)
(ppm)
Acid (%)
2.4
10.5
8.8
16.5
0.0
1670
1579
1546
1467
1138
0.74
0.36
0.02
0.03
0.02
ALTERNATIVE REFINING METHODS
611
stability of soybean oil at different stages of refining indicated that crude oil was the
most stable and highly purified oil was the least stable (192). The influence of the
refining steps on the distribution of free and esterified phytosterols in soybean and
other oils was reported by Verleyen et al (193). A significant reduction in free sterols was found after neutralization. Deodorization removed free sterols and also promoted steryl ester formation when the oil was physically refined due to a heatpromoted esterification reaction between free sterols and free fatty acids.
8.6. Fractionation and Winterization
Fractionation or winterization is a process in which the more saturated molecular
species in the oil are solidified and removed by a low-temperature treatment, which
increases the cold storage physical stability of the oil. Partially hydrogenated soybean oil with 110115 iodine value (IV) that is intended for use as salad and cooking oil should be fractionated. By doing so, the more saturated molecules and some
high-melting trans-isomers are removed to produce clear oil that meets low-temperature storage requirements. The formation of large and easily filterable crystals
and the removal of the crystallized fraction from the liquid oil can be challenging
tasks. The temperature of the oil should be lowered slowly to prevent small crystal
formation. Nucleation occurs when the oil is supercooled to a temperature that is
much lower than the thermodynamic equilibrium temperature. Heterogeneous
nucleation, i.e., the formation of nuclei on to foreign substances, typically takes
place around dust particles or on the walls of the crystallizer. The crystal growth
rate depends on the degree of supercooling and polymorphic form. In order to
have continuous and uniform crystallization, an intense but nondestructive agitation
is required. To produce salad oil with good cold stability, soybean oil is usually
hydrogenated to an iodine value of 100110 (linolenate content of 23%) and winterized at 23% C. To produce a cooking and frying oil, hydrogenation to an iodine
value less than 90 (linolenate content of less than 0.5%) is more desirable, and the
stearine fraction obtained from winterization of such oil is a good shortening and
margarine base. Crystal separation can be done by filtering, centrifuging, or decantating. More details about these systems are presented by Krishnamurthy and
Kellens (194).
9. ALTERNATIVE REFINING METHODS

Although oil extraction by mechanical pressing of soybeans accounts for a very
small percentage of soybean processing, it is used by many farm cooperatives or
family-owned on-farm operations in the United States, primarily for using protein
meals as animal feed. There is an increasing use of extrusion-expelling technology
to produce identity-preserved soybean oil and protein products for niche market.
The advantages of small tonnage requirement, no flammable solvent used, low initial capital investment, and unique products have made this processing technology
very appealing for many soybean growers and processors.
612
SOYBEAN OIL
Alternative techniques are being developed for refining soybean oil produced by
mechanical means. Simple refining methods were explored to process extrudedexpelled (E-E) soybean oils with various fatty acid compositions (174, 177). E-E
oils can be easily water degummed to very low phosphorus levels. Free fatty
acid content was reduced to 0.04% by adsorption treatment with Magnesol1, a
commercial magnesium silicate product from Dallas Group of America (Jeffersonville, IN). This material also adsorbed primary and secondary oil oxidation products. A mild steam deodorization as the last processing step produced goodquality soybean oil. This adsorption refining procedure was much milder than conventional refining, as indicated by little formation of primary and secondary lipid
oxidation products and less loss of tocopherol during refining.
10. COPRODUCTS AND UTILIZATION

10.1. Lecithin
Soybean lecithin is the predominant source of food and pharmaceutical lecithin
because of its availability and outstanding functionality. The composition of crude
soy lecithin is shown in Table 14. As a result of the presence of a large amount of
neutral oil, crude lecithin is usually de-oiled to improve its functionality. De-oiling
is based on the solubility difference of neutral and polar lipids in acetone, in which
the phospholipids are precipitated and separated. Alcohol fractionation of de-oiled
lecithin can further separate lecithin into an alcohol-soluble fraction that is enriched
with phosphatidylcholine and an alcohol-insoluble fraction enriched with phospha-
TABLE 14. Composition of Commercial Soy Lecithin in Comparison with Egg Lecithin,
wt % (195).
Compounds
Phosphatidylcholine
Phosphatidylinositol
Phosphatidylserine
Phosphatidic acid
Lysophosphatidylcholine
Lysophosphatidylethanolamine
Phytoglycolipids
Phytosterines
Other phosphorus-containing lipids
Sphingomyelin
Carbohydrate
Free fatty acids
Mono-, diacylglycerols
Water
Triacylglycerols
Soy Lecithin
Egg Lecithin
1015
912
810
12
23
12
12
47
0.52.0
58
23
max 1
max 1
max 1.5
3540
6570
913
24
24
23
max 1
Trace
max 1.5
1015
COPRODUCTS AND UTILIZATION
613
TABLE 15. Typical Composition (%) of Commercially Refined Soy Lecithin

Products (196).
Phosphatidylcholine
Phosphatidylinositol and glycolipid
Neutral oil
Others
Emulsion type favored
Lecithin
Oil-Free
Lecithin
Alcohol-Soluble
Lecithin
Alcohol-Insoluble
29
29
32
3
7
60
30
2
4
4
4
29
55
4
8
o/w
w/o
w/o or o/w
tidylinositol. The phosphatidylcholine-enriched fraction is an excellent oil-in-water

emulsifier, and the phosphoinositol-enriched fraction is a good water-in-oil emulsifier that is often used in the chocolate industry. The typical composition of de-oiled
and fractionated lecithin products is shown in Table 15.
Supercritical CO2 extraction also has been used to selectively extract phosphatidylcholine from de-oiled soybean lecithin (197). The effects of temperature, pressure, and amount of ethanol on phosphatidylcholine extraction were examined, and
a high-purity product could be produced with optimized conditions.
Lecithin recovered from solvent-extracted soybean oil had different phospholipid class compositions from those produced by mechanical pressing (198). The
percentage of phosphatidylcholine was considerably higher in lecithin recovered
from extruded-expelled oil than from solvent-extracted oil. The phosphatidylcholine- and phosphatidylinositol-enriched fractions produced by ethanol extraction
of the crude lecithin also showed different functional properties (199).
Soybean lecithins can be chemically altered to modify their emulsifying properties and improve their dispersibility in aqueous systems. Phospholipids may be
hydrolyzed by acid, base, or enzyme to achieve better hydrophilic and emulsification properties. Hydroxylation of lecithin improves its oil-in-water emulsification
property and water dispersibility. Acetylation creates improved fluidity and emulsification, water dispersion properties, and heat stability (200).
10.2. Deodorizer Distillate
Deodorizer distillate is the material collected from the steam distillation of oils. It is
a mixture of free fatty acids (especially during physical refining) tocopherols, phytosterols and their esters, hydrocarbons, and lipid oxidation products. The quality
and composition of deodorizer distillate depends on the feedstock oil composition
and processing conditions. Tocopherols and sterols are the most valuable components that can be recovered from the distillate, and they are used in the nutrition
supplement and pharmaceutical industries (201). Typical soybean deodorizer distillate contains about 33% unsaponifiable matters, of which 11% is tocopherol and
18% sterol (202).
614
SOYBEAN OIL
Soybean tocopherols are the major source of natural fat-soluble antioxidants and
Vitamin E. The Vitamin E activity of natural d-a-tocopherol is much greater that
that of synthetic Vitamin E, which is a mixture of eight stereoisomers (203). Phytosterols are used as raw materials for over 75% of the worlds steroid production.
The more recent application of phytosterol, phytostanol, and their fatty acid esters
in margarine and table spreads is based on the blood cholesterol-lowering effect of
these compounds (204, 205). The recent development of functional foods containing phytosterols has been reviewed by Hollingsworth (206) and Hicks and Moreau (207).
The preparation of high-purity tocopherols and phytosterols involves steps such
as molecular distillation, adduct formation, liquid-liquid extraction, supercritical
fluid extraction, saponification, and chromatography (175). The extraction of tocopherols from soybean oil deodorizer distillate by urea inclusion and saponification
of free fatty acids resulted in good recovery of tocopherols (208). To improve the
separation of sterols and tocopherols, Shimada et al. (209) used a lipase to esterify
sterols with free fatty acids. Then the steryl esters and tocopherols were separated
better by molecular distillation. Chang et al. (210) used supercritical fluid CO2
extraction to recover tocopherols and sterols from soybean oil deodorizer distillate.
A patent by Sumner et al. (211) advocated treatment of the distillate with methanol
to converted free fatty acids and other fatty acid esters to methyl esters that can then
be removed by a stripping operation. Then separation of sterols and tocopherols
could be carried out by molecular distillation.
10.3. Soapstock
Soap is recovered from alkaline neutralization of the crude or degummed soybean
oil. Soap consists of water, free fatty acids, neutral oil, phospholipids, unsaponifiable matter, proteins, and mucilaginous substances. Its composition depends on
seed quality and oil extraction and refining conditions. Soapstock is the least valuable byproduct from oil processing, and it is generated at a rate of about 6% of the
volume of crude soybean oil refined (212), amounting to as much as 0.8 million MT
in the United States annually. The majority of the soap or acidulated soap is used as
a feed ingredient contributing metabolizable energy. Soybean oil can be refined
using potassium hydroxide and acidulated with sulfuric acid, followed by neutralization with ammonia rather than sodium hydroxide to produce a fertilizer (213).
Soybean oil methyl esters can also be produced from soapstock (214218) for biodiesel applications.
11. FOOD AND BIOBASED PRODUCT USES OF SOYBEAN OIL

11.1. Distribution of Soybean Oil Utilization
In 20012002, when 8.32 million MT (18,300 million pounds) of soybean oil was
used in the United States, over 97% (8.09 million MT, 17,800 million pounds) was
used for food, with the remainder used in nonfood products (219). Among the food
FOOD AND BIOBASED PRODUCT USES OF SOYBEAN
615
uses, about 48% (3.89 million MT, 8,570 million pounds) was for shortening, 43%
(3.58 million MT, 7,897 million pounds) for cooking and salad oils, 7% (0.56 million MT, 1,237 million pounds) for margarine, and 1% (0.06 million MT, 125 million pounds) for other food uses. Soybean oil is used to produce about 95% of the
total margarine and 83% of the total shortening consumed in the United States.
Among the 0.24 million MT (519 million pounds) used in nonfood products,
about 16% (0.04 million MT, 85 million pounds) was for resins and plastics,
12% (0.03 million MT, 60 million pounds) for paint and varnish, 13% (0.03 million
MT, 68 million pounds) for fatty acids, and 59% (0.14 million MT, 306 million
pounds) for a myriad of other inedible uses. The use of soybean oil in lubricants
(220), oleochemicals (221), and bioplastics (222), and the production of methyl
soyate for environmentally friendly solvents (223, 224) and for blending with diesel
fuel to produce biodiesel (20% methyl soyate/80% diesel fuel) (225) are significant
parts of the soy oil used in nonfood applications (226). Usage of soybean oil to
make biodiesel is likely to increase in future years because several new plants
are planned for construction as a result of the recent Farm Bill of 2002 providing
financial incentives for producing biobiesel. Some states, notably Minnesota, have
enacted legislation that provides biodiesel tax incentives. Biodiesel interests have
become organized as the National Biodiesel Board (Jefferson City, MO) and the
Renewable Fuels Association (Washington, DC), and exercise considerable political influence. During 2002, 57 million liters (15 million gal) of biodiesel were produced in the United States (227), almost three times that which was produced in
2001.
The usage of soybean oil in food products is similar to other oils, and these uses
and products are discussed in more detail for all oils in other chapters of this edition. This chapter will focus on specifics of soybean oil in those uses. The major
products in which soybean oil is consumed are cooking and salad oils, frying oils
and fats, baking shortenings, and margarine. Only minor amounts of soybean oil are
used in vegetable dairy products and confectionery products.
11.2. Trading Rules for Crude and Refined Soybean Oils
As the U.S. government does not have trading rules, the National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA, Washington, D.C.) has established them, including quality
specifications, to facilitate trade and marketing of three types of oils: crude
degummed, once-refined, and fully refined soybean oils (Table 16). These rules
are also available on the Internet (228). Factors that impact grade of crude
degummed and once-refined soybean oils are moisture and volatile matter content,
flash point, free fatty acid content, smoke point, unsaponifiable matter content,
green color, phosphorus content, and refined bleached color. The flash point reflects
the presence of residual hexane, and the other factors reflect expected refining loss.
For fully refined soybean oils, the flavor, cold test values, peroxide value, and AOM
(Active Oxygen Method) are additional considerations that reflect crystallization
at low temperatures and stability to oxidation. Crude soybean oil is sold as
degummed oil because the gums tend to spontaneously hydrate and settle out during
616
SOYBEAN OIL
TABLE 16. Trading Specifications for Crude Degummed, Once-Refined and Fully Refined
Soybean Oils (228).
Factor
Crude Degummed
Once-Refineda
Fully Refineda
Methods of
Analysisb
Moisture and volatile

matter and
insoluble impurities (%)
0.3 max.c
0.10 max.
0.10 max.d
Ca 2d-25
(up to 0.15 with

discount)
Ca 3a-46
Flash point (% C)
Free fatty acids
(% as oleic)
121 min.
0.75 max.
(up to 0.15 with

discount)
121 min.
0.10 max.
0.05 max.
Cc 9c-95
Ca 5a-40
(up to 1.25 with

discount)
1.5 max.
(up to 0.15 with

discount)
1.5 max.
1.5 max.
Ca 6a-40
Unsaponifiable
matter (%)
Presence of fish and
marine animal oils
Phosphorus (%)
Neg.
28.121
0.02 max.
(up to 0.025 with
discount)
Ca 12-55
Refined bleached color

(Lovibond)
Green color
Flavor
Cold test (hr)
Peroxide value
(meg/kg)
AOM Stability
(hr to 35 PV)
3.5 Red max.
20 Yellow, 2.0
Red, max.
Cc 8e-63
Cc 13b-45
Bland
5.5 min.
2.0 max.
Cc 11-53
Cd 8-53
8 min.
Cd 12-57
None
The oil shall be clear and brilliant in appearance at 2129% C (7085% F) and free from settlings in this
temperature range.
b
Analyses in accordance with the Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists Society except
for presence of fish and marine animal oils in accordance with Association of Official Analytical Chemists
methods.
c
Includes insoluble impurities as determined by AOCS Method Ca 3-46.
d
Oil shall be free of settlings or foreign matter of any kind.
transportation and storage, which cause numerous handling problems. Once-refined

soybean oil is seldom traded anymore because most buyers do their own refining or
purchase fully refined oil. End-users typically have their own specifications for fully
refined soybean oil and use the NOPA values as bases for their more stringent specifications (136).
11.3. Cooking and Salad Oils
In most parts of the world, both cooking and salad oils from soybeans are refined to
have bland taste and light color. For other oils, distinct flavors and dark colors may
be acceptable. Important distinctions between salad oils, cooking oils, and frying
617
oils, however, reflect their differences in oxidative and thermal stabilities. Cooking
and frying oils need to be more stable to oxidation than salad oil because of the
higher temperatures to which cooking oils are exposed. Temperature stability is
especially required in fats and oils used in deep-fat frying. Salad oils must be physically stable so that they do not crystalize at refrigerated temperatures.
As soybean oil contains relatively great amounts of the polyunsaturates, notably
unstable linoleate (61%) and linolenate (7.8%), partial hydrogenation is customary
to make cooking or salad oils more stable to oxidation. Typical specifications for
different cooking and salad oils are shown in Table 17.
Synthetic antioxidants, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated
hydroxytoluene (BHT), propyl gallate (PG), ascorbyl palmitate, and tertiary-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), are used in soybean cooking oils and frying fats (230).
These antioxidants are typically added at 0.01% for one antioxidant and 0.02% total
for two or more. Natural antioxidants, derived from sage, rosemary, and green tea,
are increasingly popular because of consumer preferences for natural food ingredients (231).
Salad oils differ from cooking oils in their tolerance to cold temperatures without crystallizing. Salad oils must not crystallize, cloud, or leave deposits of any kind
when stored at refrigerator temperatures (4.4% C) and are defined as such. Soybean
oil used as a salad oil should not cloud or produce any visible crystals and remain
brilliant and clear for a minimum of 5.5 hr at 0% C. Fully refined soybean oil can be
directly used as salad oil because it will normally meet this specification, whereas
other oils, such as sunflower and corn, must be dewaxed before they can meet typical salad oil specifications. Soybean oil may be partially hydrogenated and then
winterized to achieve greater oxidative stability and still not crystallize nor lose
proper emulsion properties when refrigerated, although most of the soybean oil
used in commercial dressings is not hydrogenated.
New nutrition-oriented salad and cooking oils have been developed in recent
years. LoSatSoy is an oil low in saturated fatty acids that was developed at Iowa
State University, licensed to Pioneer Hybrid International (Johnston, IA), and commercialized as a salad or cooking oil. This specialty soybean oil has one-half the
amount of saturated fatty acids in normal soybean oil (7% versus 15%); therefore, it
is promoted as having improved nutritional and health benefits.
Other specialty soybean oils, low (<2% or <1%) in linolenate and with
improved oxidative stabilities in salad and cooking oil applications, are comparable
with typical soybean oil that is partially hydrogenated. Today, low-linolenic-acid
soybean oil is an attractive alternative to hydrogenated oil that contains trans-fatty
acids. Beginning in 2006, labeled food products must disclose both the grams of saturated
fat and grams of trans-fat per serving (232). This is inducing food companies to
eliminate or significantly reduce trans-fatty acid contents of their products.
All specialty soybean oils require identity-preserved soybean production, crushing, and refining systems. As financial incentives are needed all along the production process to compensate for increased costs of identity preservation, specialty
soybean oils command premium consumer prices and have been slow to impact
soybean oil markets.
618
SOYBEAN OIL
TABLE 17. Trading Specifications for Soybean Cooking and Salad Oils (229).
Factor
Source of specifications
Moisture and volatile
matter (max) (%)
Unsaponifiable content (%)
Flash point, % C
Free fatty acids (wt%)
as oleic
Red color (Lovibond)
Yellow color (Lovibond)
Peroxide value (meg/

kg)
Cooking and Salad Oil
Refined,
Fully,
Fully,
HWb
Deodorized
Refineda
Refineda
Soybean
Analytical
Methodc
Fedd,e
NSPA
ASCSf
Fedd
0.06 max.
0.10 max.
0.06 max.
Ca 2d-25
1.5 max.
0.10 max.
(0.14 with
discount)
Ca 6a-40
0.05 max.g,h
0.05 max.
228 min.
0.05 max.
0.05 max.g,h
Cc 9b-55
Ca 5a-40
4 max.
2.0 max.
2.0 (2.6 with

discount)
2.0 max.
Cc 8b-52
20 max.
Cc 8e-63
Cc 13b-45
Cc 8b-52
35 max.
20 max.
20 max.
1.0 max.h
2.0 max.
0.5 max.
(1.0 with
discount)
1.0 max.h
Cc 8e-63
Cc 13b-45
Cd 8-53
35 max.
35 max.
Cd 1257
Fat stability by AOM

methodi
(a) Peroxide value
after 8 hr
(b) Peroxide value
of 100 or less at
indicated no. of hr
Cold test (hr)
Free from sediment
and foreign matter of
any kind
Clear and brilliant at
2129% C
Fish oil and marine
animal oil test
Iodine value
Linolenic acid (wt%)
15 min.h
25 min.h
Cd 12-57
Yesj
Yes
Yes
Yesj
Ca 3-46
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Neg.
Cd 1-25
Cd 7-58
Cd 1-62
Odor and flavor
105115
3.0 max. by
or 3.5 max.
by
1
TABLE 17. (Continued )

Additives
n
/preservative
Permitted/required
n, q
619
Typically a refined, bleached, and deodorized oil.

Refined, bleached, partially hydrogenated, winterized, and deodorized, pure soybean oil.
Analyses in accordance with the Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists Society
Champaign, Illinois, unless indicated otherwise.
d
Federal specifications No. JJJ-S-30G dated March 24, 1978, issued by U.S. General Services Administration,
Washington, D.C.
e
The salad oil may contain properly refined and deodorized cottonseed, corn, peanut, soybean, sesame,
sunflower, or safflower vegetable oils or a mixture of these oils. Olive oil shall not be used. Edible vegetable
oils not specified may also be used provided they are in accordance with good commercial practice.
f
Specifications per announcement PV-501 dated June 17, 1976, issued by Agricultural Stabilization and
Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Shawnee Mission, Kansas.
g
0.05% will be acceptable if propyl gallate has been added as an antioxidant or as a component in an
antioxidant.
h
Determination will be made within 7 days after packaging each lot.
i
Active oxygen method.
j
Exclusive of particles of resinous flux material from can manufacture.
k
Association of Official Analytical Chemists Method No. 28.107.
l
The oil after heating shall be bland and free from beany, rancid, painty, musty, soapy, fishy, metallic, and other
undesirable or foreign flavors and odors when tested by the method prescribed in footnote m within 7 days
after packaging each lot.
m
Approximately 50 g of the finished product shall be placed in a clean 150-mL Pyrex glass beaker and heated
to a temperature 177 ! 3% C. The oil shall be examined for odor at this temperature, and for flavor, each
cooling to approximately 38% C. From Federal Specification JJJ-S-30G.
n
Heavy metal scavengers, antifoaming agents, and antioxidant materials may be added to improve the
keeping quality and use performance of the oils. The ASCA specifications also permit the addition of
oxystearin. Such additives should be of a kind and at levels permitted in edible oil products under the federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated thereunder.
o
Preservatives generally recognized as safe are permitted.
p
During the cooling stage of deodorization, 0.005% of citric acid or 0.006% of monoisopropyl citrate shall be
added to the oil.
q
The packaging gas shall be of food-grade quality and may consist of pure nitrogen or a mixture of nitrogen
and approximately 10% of carbon dioxide plus other inert gases in the atmosphere, but it shall contain no
more than 0.005% oxygen. Maximum permissible oxygen content of the headspace gas within 15 min after
the oil is packaged is 0.50% as measured at standard temperature and pressure. Measurement shall be made
at time of packaging or within 15 min thereafter. For method of analysis, see Bulletin 916, issued in 1963 by
American Dry Milk Institute, Chicago, IL.
b
c
11.4. Frying Oils and Fats

In addition to its use as a common household cooking oil, soybean oil is used
widely in home and commercial deep-fat frying procedures. The popularity of fried
foods among U.S. consumers has created a large market for stable frying oils and
for fast-food establishments. Typical untreated cooking and salad oils, including
soybean oil, are not suitable for frying applications because they oxidize too
quickly. Thus, the oils must be altered to make them stable to the frying treatment.
Heat treatments, such as commercial and household frying, accelerate autoxidation. The heat itself causes oxidation and breakdown of the fat. In addition, when
620
SOYBEAN OIL
fats are heated in the presence of moisture, as often is the case in food applications,
fatty acids are released via hydrolysis of the ester linkages (233). The free fatty
acids, in turn, can accelerate oxidation of the oil. Decomposition and condensation
of hydroperoxides also produces a multitude of nonvolatile monomeric products,
including di- and tri-oxygenated esters, and dimeric and polymeric materials, especially at elevated temperature. Many of these dimers and polymers are known to be
rich sources of volatile carbonyl compounds and decrease the flavor and oxidative
stability of soybean oil (234). These high-molecular-weight materials also can produce a series of physical and chemical changes to the oil and food products, including increased viscosity, polarity, free-fatty acid content, development of dark color,
and an increased tendency of the oil to foam (233).
A typical soybean oil shortening is generally hydrogenated to enhance its
stability, making it suitable for frying procedures. In addition, polydimethylsiloxane
is routinely added at a level of 0.022 ppm as an antifoaming agent, which greatly
extends the frying life of soybean oil (235). The antioxidants mentioned in the
subsection on Cooking and Salad Oils provide oil stability prior to frying and
can enhance the oxidative stability of the fried food. Even though most antioxidants
are volatile at frying temperatures, with their concentration decreasing during
frying, some antioxidant is transferred to and retained in the food (carry through),
thus providing antioxidant protection in the food during storage. In tests,
heated palm olein with no frying lost 70% of its original BHT and 60% of the
original BHA after 8 hr (236). TBHQ being the highest molecular weight (lowest
volatility) of the typical antioxidnts, provides the greatest carry-through benefit
(237).
Extensive hydrogenation produces flaked fats or shortening-like products for frying applications, which offer convenience in filling fryers and excellent frying stability. Unfortunately, the process of hydrogenation creates trans-fatty acids as
byproducts of the reaction As noted elsewhere in this chapter, recent concerns about
the presence of trans-fatty acids in our diets, and the subsequent new labeling
requirements for trans-fatty acids (232), have prompted food manufacturers and
oil producers to explore alternative treatments to create soybean oil that is stable
to frying.
One procedure to increase stability without creating trans-fatty acids involves
adding a small amount of a fully hydrogenated oil (hardstock) to a typical soybean
oil. The blended oil is then interesterified to create a stable frying oil without
trans-fatty acids. In a recent study, the low-linolenate soybean oil noted in the
subsection on Cooking and Salad Oils, when blended with 5% of a soybean oil
hardstock, was as stable as a traditional trans-fat-containing soybean oil that
had been stabilized for deep-fat frying, while still retaining excellent flavor
characteristics (238). Another approach to enhance frying stability of soybean
oils is to increase the oleate concentration in the soybean oil created by the
plant, either through traditional plant breeding or biotechnological methods. The
resulting oil, however, when used in frying, creates a fried food with a stale,
waxy-like flavor that lacks the desirable flavor components typical of a fried
food (239, 240).
621
11.5. Mayonnaise and Salad Dressing

In the United States, mayonnaise, salad dressing, and French dressing are defined
by Standards of Identity issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA;
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 21, 169.140) (241). The Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1930 and later revisions and amendments were promulgated to prevent
adulteration and misrepresentation of certain food products by establishing
Standards of Identity.
Mayonnaise is defined as a semisolid food prepared with not less than 65% vegetable oil, and egg yolk and vinegar. Most mayonnaise in the United States, however,
contains 7582% oil, to get the proper texture (242). Soybean oil is usually used in
mayonnaise but winterized cottonseed, corn, and canola and hydrogenated soybean
oil also can be used. Mayonnaise is an oil-in-water emulsion with oil droplets measuring 12 mm in diameter. The higher the oil content, the more tightly the oil droplets are packed in the continuous water phase and thus, the greater the viscosity
and rigidity. Mayonnaise production is partly an art because of the difficulty of producing an oil-in-water emulsion in which the dispersed phase has seven times more
volume than the continuous phase. The protein in the egg yolk solids is the only
emulsifier allowed and processing conditions play critical roles in achieving
high-quality and high-stability mayonnaise.
Salad dressings are also oil-in-water emulsions and were developed as alternatives to mayonnaise. The Standard of Identity (21 CFR, 1699.150) requires that salad dressings contain not less than 30% vegetable oil (but most contain 3550% oil),
vinegar, *4% egg yolk, and starch. For texture and viscosity, salad dressings rely
on starch, in contrast to mayonnaise, which depends on greater oil content. The oils
used in salad dressings are selected using the same criteria for mayonnaise.
The qualities of mayonnaise and salad dressing are determined by the physical
and oxidative stability of its lipid components. Phase separation or emulsion
breakdown is caused by mechanical shock, agitation, extreme temperatures, or
fat crystallization. Oxidation of vegetable oil and egg lipid also can occur. As the
quality of oil plays a major role in the flavor stability of these products, only the
best quality salad oil should be used. It is particularly important to use salad oils
with long cloud point times (high cold test hours). If fat crystals form during storage
at refrigerated temperatures, the emulsion will break and the product will become
unsightly with visible free oil. Crystal inhibitors, such as oxystearine, lecithin, and
polyglycerol esters, are allowed to prevent crystallization and emulsion breakdown.
Although mayonnaise and salad dressings are spoonable products due to their
high viscosity, French dressing is a pourable oil-in-water dressing. French dressing
must contain *35% oil as defined by a Standard of Identity (21 CFR, 169.115). Egg
products are optional. Other dressings, such as Thousand Island, are not subject to
Standards of Identity, and any ingredients can be used. Pourable dressings can be in
two different finished forms; emulsion or two phases depending on whether the product is homogenized. The oil used in these products is predominantly soybean salad
oil in the United States. In Canada and Europe, other salad oils are often used,
depending on the availability and costs of those vegetable oils in each specific region.
622
SOYBEAN OIL
As the oil contents of mayonnaise, salad dressings, and French dressing are high,
it is important to prepare them from salad oils that taste bland and are relatively
stable to oxidation. Peroxide values of the oil should be <2 meq/kg. Even early
stages of oxidation can be detected in mayonnaise and salad dressings as grassy
and beany flavors. Packaging with an inert headspace is important to prevent
oxidation during distribution, retailing, and consumer storage. Storage under refrigeration is important once the package is opened and the headspace gas becomes
replaced with air.
11.6. Margarine
Margarine was first produced in 1869 by the French chemist Hippolyte Megge
Mouries. During the Franco-Prussian War, he was awarded a prize and patent for
his invention of a butter substitute. It was not until the 1940s, however, that margarine became widely used. Until then, the powerful dairy industry in the United
States prevented the sale of colored margarine in many states, and consumers did
not readily accept white table margarine. Today, more than twice as much margarine is consumed as butter per capita in the United States, and margarine is no longer
considered a cheap imitation of butter. Unlike butter, margarine can be formulated
from a variety of fats and oils to give a variety of physical and functional properties,
which are needed in many food applications today.
In the United States, margarine or oleomargarine is also controlled by an FDA
Standard of Identity (21 CFR, 166.110), requiring at least 80% fat. Soybean oil is
predominantly used in the United States, followed by cottonseed and corn oils. The
other 20% of the margarine formulation may be made up of water and other
optional ingredients, including milk products, soy protein isolate, salt, selected
emulsifiers (up to 0.5%), mold inhibitors, antioxidants, color additives, flavorings,
and acidulants. Margarine is a water-in-oil emulsion.
The traditional retail form of margarine is stick margarine, but margarine is now
also marketed as pourable and soft tub products. Margarine may also be sold as a
whipped product in which air or an inert gas is incorporated. Still other margarinelike forms, including polyunsaturated and low-fat spreads, have been developed to
satisfy consumer demands for improved convenience and reduced saturated fat and
calories. In addition to the traditional use as a table food, margarine is also widely
used in baking applications such as in cookies and as roll-in fats for puff and Danish
pastries.
A significant recent consumer trend is increased demand for margarine-like
spreads that are not controlled by a Standard of Identity and that contain much
less fat. Most spreads contain 4060% fat with 40% fat spreads being more popular
in Europe and 60% in the United States. During the past 15 years, however, very
low-fat spreads containing less than 20% fat have been introduced. As a result of
these trends, there are significantly fewer 80%-fat margarine products available in
the United States today than in the previous decades. Stabilizing these high levels of
aqueous phases in such a small amount of fat as the continuous phase requires special equipment to generate the necessary shear and higher amounts of emulsifiers.
623
Moustafa (243) reports that the aqueous droplets must no longer be spherical but
rather polyhedral when loading levels of the aqueous phase exceed 74%.
Margarine processing includes blending the fats separately from the aqueous
phase ingredients and water, dispersing and emulsifying the aqueous phase within
the fat phase, chilling to solidify the fats, pin working the solidified mass, resting,
forming, and packaging. The ingredients are emulsified before being fed into a
swept-surface heat exchanger for crystallizing. The mass emerging from the cooling tubes is partially solidified, and it is further crystallized in the working unit. The
texture of the product is further modified in the resting tube before the margarine is
packaged.
Margarine and shortening have fat crystal networks in which liquid oil is
entrained. As a result, they exhibit a yield stress that must be exceeded before
the product begins to flow as a viscous fluid. The yield stress is related to spreadability. The rheological properties of margarine have been discussed by Segura
et al. (244).
In North America, margarines may be composed of blends of hydrogenated soybean oil and palm oil, partially hydrogenated soybean oil and cottonseed oil, liquid
soybean oil and partially hydrogenated soybean oil, liquid corn oil and hydrogenated corn oil, or simply hydrogenated soybean oil. Most oil blends contain high
levels of soybean oil to keep costs competitive. Table 18 shows some typical compositions and properties of margarine.
The most important functional properties of margarines and spreads are spreadability and hardness, oiliness, and melting characteristics. These properties relate to
fat level, proportion of solid fat, fat melting point, and crystal form. Diverse textures and functionalities can be achieved by varying the extent of hydrogenation.
Consistency and emulsion stability depend on the amount and type of crystallized
fat. Spreadability and hardness can be predicted by the solid fat index and penetration measurements. A cone penetrometer is typically used to determine margarine
hardness (245). Typical margarines should be spreadable at refrigeration temperatures, remain semisolid at ambient temperatures, and melt at less than body
temperature. Oil-off refers to the separation of liquid fat when the fat crystals no
longer form a network able to hold the liquid oil.
TABLE 18. Compositions and Properties of Hydrogenated and Interesterified Soybean

Margarine Oils (187).
Soybean Oil
Type
Hydrogenated
Hydrogenated
Hydrogenated
Interesterified
Interesterified
Interesterified
Stick margarine
Tub margarine
Tub margarine
90:10a
85:15a
80:20a
Melting Point
10% C 21.1% C 33.3% C

(% C)
28.6
15.6
7.1
1.7
4.3
8.0
18.9
8.8
4.5
1.3
2.2
3.5
5.3
1.3
2.0
0.2
0.9
2.2
46
46
46
40
46
47
Trans
IV
(%)
(calc)
31.0
23.2
12.9
1.7
2.1
1.6
92.1
108.0
121.8
123.8
116.6
109.4
624
SOYBEAN OIL
Fats exhibit polymorphism in which they can exist in different crystalline forms
depending on how the triacylglycerols pack in the crystal and a, b0 , and b polymorphs are known. The preferred polymorphic form for margarine is b0 , which
gives a smooth, pleasing mouthfeel and proper spreadability. Despite hydrogenated
soybean oils tendency to form b crystals, it is used in over 90% of all margarines
and table spreads in the United States. The less heterogeneous the fatty acid composition of the hydrogenated fats, the more it is b tending. Hydrogenated fats richer
in trans-isomers are less b tending and tend to produce margarines with smoother
textures. Blending small amounts of b0 -tending base fats (palm and cottonseed
oils) or different soybean base oils increase fatty acid heterogeneity favoring b0
crystal stability. Blending unmodified oils with oils that have been hydrogenated
to various degrees allows the production of margarines with desirable texture.
The greater the number of base stocks available, the greater the flexibility to produce a wide range of products and the higher the tolerance to processing conditions.
Different procedures for designing good margarine from various base stocks were
evaluated by Cho et al. (246).
Base oils for margarine must be hydrogenated to achieve the desired solid-fat
content with the consequential isomerization of some fatty acids. The new regulations requiring reporting of trans-fats content on labels may dissuade some consumers from using traditional margarine. Emken (247) reported that some traditional
margarines may have as much as 21% trans-fatty acids while Kellens (187) found
as much as 31%, and DSouza et al. (248) reported that the high-melting acylglycerols contained in hydrogenated base stocks used for formulating North American
margarines have 33.145.0% trans-fatty acid content in stick margarine and 22.4
30.1% trans-fatty acid content in soft margarine. Trans-acyl groups contribute to
the firmness of margarine. A recent comprehensive review concluded that consuming more than 4% of total calories as trans-fatty acids may raise plasma lipid levels
(249) and may cause heart disease (250, 251).
Some companies are producing low-trans- or zero trans-margarines by random
(252) or directed interesterification of mixtures of unhydrogenated and fully hydrogenated soybean oils and other fats (253). To produce these products, a liquid oil
and completely hydrogenated hardstock are interesterified, so that proper plasticity
can be obtained. Oils that contain considerable amounts of palmitic acid favorably
influence crystallization and polymorphic form of the interesterified fat blends
(254).
Chemical interesterification is conveniently achieved by using alkali metal
methylates as a catalyst. Microbial lipases are also used as biocatalysts in enzymatic interesterification. In contrast to the chemical process, the enzymatic process
can be more selective if an enzyme with positional specificity is used, but this
reaction is usually much slower and more sensitive to reaction conditions. Recent
developments in lipase-catalyzed interesterification have resulted in new industrial
applications of this process (255). Nevertheless, the high costs of enzymes and process equipment may limit widespread adoption of this process.
In developing trans-free fat, various methods for laboratory-scale, pilot plant,
and commercial batch reaction were described by Erickson (256). List et al.
625
TABLE 19. Example of Combined Hydrogenation, Interesterification, and Fractionation

to Produce Low Trans-Margarine Fat (187).
Solid Fat Content (%, at % C)
Iodine Value
Soybean oil (SBO) feedstock
Fully hydrogenated SBO (FHSBO)
Blending SBO and FHSBO (60:40)
Random interesterification of SBO
and FHSBO (60:40)
Fractionation of the interesterified oil
Soft fraction
Hard fraction
Melting
Point (% C)
10
20
30
40
134
1
81
81
$7
71
63
53
0
95
44
38
94
42
33
94
39
20
93
35
11
91
63
24
58
25
60
1
58
0
45
0
32
(252) developed a zero-trans margarine by interesterifying 80% refined, bleached,

and deodorized (RBD) soybean oil with 20% fully hydrogenated soybean oil. The
resulting product has a solid fat index comparable with that of conventional products. The randomly interesterified low- [zero-] trans-soybean margarines crystallize in the more favorable b0 crystal form (252) but tend to crystallize slowly after
chilling and result in a product that is harder than desired (257). Addition of 20%
liquid soybean oil to the interesterified oil yielded a softer, more desirable product.
Table 19 presents a typical example of the combined use of hydrogenation, interesterification, and fractionation to produce low-trans fats with physical properties
comparable with partially hydrogenated soybean oil with high trans content.
Alternatively, recent research has focused on soybeans bred for high contents of
saturated fatty acids, some with as much as '43% saturates, 23% palmitate, and
20% stearate compared with the normal '15 % saturates, 11% palmitate, and
4% stearate. Soybeans only produce cis-fatty acids and, thus, there are no sources
of trans-fatty acids in the blends. List et al. (258, 259) showed that soybean oil from
soybeans bred to produce 3040% saturates was not sufficiently solid to make good
margarine, but soybean oil with elevated saturated fatty acid contents (1738%)
could be blended with high-melting oils, such as palm oil, interesterified palm
oil, interesterified palm and soybean oils, and cottonseed and soybean hardstocks,
to make a good margarine. Kok et al. (260) used blends (50:50) of traditional soybean oil and oil from soybeans bred to produce oil high in saturated fat ('43% saturates, 23% palmitate, 20% stearate). The blend was then interesterified to produce
oil that was made into soft tub margarines. The small differences in sensory properties observed in comparisons with other tub margarines indicated the interesterified
product should be quite acceptable to most consumers. List et al. (259) also report
randomly interesterifying (randomizing) neat soybean oil high in saturated fatty
acids (10% palmitate, 18% stearate) gave good margarine without graininess
(SFI values of 58 at 10% C, 23 at 21.1% C, and 12 at 33.3% C).
626
SOYBEAN OIL
11.7. Shortenings
Shortenings are fats of vegetable or animal origin used in baking, but the term
shortening also has been accepted as a term to describe semisolid fats for frying
and cooking. Just as in margarine, the solid fat exists as a tight network of small
crystals, which trap liquid oil. Plastic shortenings differ from margarine in that
shortening is not an emulsion; it is all lipid material and may contain emulsifiers.
Prior to the development of hydrogenation, lard and tallow were the principle shortening fats, but these fats lack the diversity of texture and functionality required for
many products. Today, most shortenings contain at least some soybean oil, largely
because it is the least expensive oil that can confer adequate functionality. Shortening is available in many forms: plastic and semisolid (cubed, sheeted, and
printed), pourable fluid (with suspended solids), encapsulated powder, and flaked.
Most plastic shortenings are produced by blending oils with hydrogenated fats and
often emulsifiers and solidifying or crystallizing and plasticizing the blend. The
shortening is packaged and tempered by holding it in a quiescent state for several
days at 30% C. During solidification, 1025% air is often incorporated to improve the
color and texture. Pourable and fluid shortenings are produced by blending appropriate oils and emulsifiers. They are crystallized by cooling the fluid mass and stirring the suspended crystals for 46 hr at precise temperatures so that large crystals
do not develop, and the fluid becomes stabilized.
Shortenings are added to baked goods to shorten or tenderize them by interrupting the gluten structure. Shortenings improve mouthfeel and eating qualities, add
lubricity, improve dough-handling properties, contribute flavor and structure, and
promote desirable crumb grain and texture (261). Shortening and tenderizing
effects are especially important in cakes, piecrusts, pastries, cookies, and crackers.
Generally, solid fat indices that change little with temperature are desired for most
shortening applications. Table 20 shows plasticity and melting properties of different commercial shortenings. Typical shortening levels are 25% in bread, 525% in
cake, 2030% in sweet goods, 3040% in puff pastry, and 2035% in piecrusts.
Many plastic shortenings are packaged in 50-lb polyethylene-lined boxes, primarily for use in retail bakeries, e.g., in grocery stores. These are difficult to handle
in large, automated wholesale bakeries. Sometimes, 190-kg drums are used, but are
still difficult to manage and use in the bakery where large amounts are needed.
Pourable and pumpable fluid shortenings were developed to avoid these problems
and are based on soybean oil. However, liquid oils do not cream and aerate well.
The addition of small amounts of hardfats, known as stearine, and various emulsifiers can impart good functional properties to the liquid shortening.
Although adequate quality bread and rolls can be produced without shortening
by using the sponge-and-dough or straight-dough methods, the inclusion of shortening increases volume by as much as 25% compared with breads with no shortening. This volume increase often is referred to as oven spring, and it reduces
firmness throughout the products storage life. The largest volume of bread is
made by the continuous-mixing method in the United States and shortening is critical to good quality bread manufactured when using this method. Shortening
TABLE 20. Typical Compositions and Properties of Baking Shortenings.
Type
Cookie and pie dough shortening
Cake and icing shortening
Yeast-raised sweet goods
Fluid cake shortening
High volume cream filling and

icing
Biscuit shortening
Roll-in margarine for yeast-raised
sweet goods
Fluid bread shortening
Fluid bread shortening
Composition
Partially hydrogenated soybean and palm oils
(unemulsified)
Partially hydrogenated soybean and cottonseed oils
(mono and diglycerides)
Partially hydrogenated soybean and palm oils (mono and
diglycerides)
Partially hydrogenated soybean oil (mono and diglycerides, triglycerol monostearate, sodium stearoyl 2lactylate)
diglycerides, polysorbate 60)
Partially hydrogenated soybean and palm oils
(unemulsified)
diglycerides)
Partially hydrogenated soybean oil (mono and
diglycerides)
Partially hydrogenated soybean oil (mono and
diglycerides, sodium stearoyl 2-lactylate, ethoxylated
mono and diglycerides)
Solid Fat Index

Melting Point
10% C
21.1% C 26.7% C
33.3% C
37.8% C
(% C)
2630
1822
1620
1215
9.513
4648
2327
1619
1518
1215
912
4850
2429
1418
2528
1922
912
1821
1417
2530
1620
2530
1519
7.5
11.5
69
4447
1114
4749
4447
4142
628
SOYBEAN OIL
delays starch gelatinization and allows the dough to expand more before the structure is set. Maximum loaf volume, which is a desirable trait in the United States, is
achieved with 6% of emulsified shortening, based on flour weight, but, in practice,
35% is normally used. Hardfats in bread shortenings are important in reducing collapse of the loafs sidewall. At least 4% hydrogenated lard stearine is desired in
many bread shortenings. Refined, bleached, and deodorized soybean oil is used
in most commercial white pan breads.
Bread shortenings should crystallize in the b form. The base fat of a typical plastic bread shortening is comprised of 90% partially hydrogenated soybean oil (70
IV) and 10% lard stearine (<5 IV); whereas the base fat of a typical fluid bread
shortening is comprised of 95% partially hydrogenated soybean oil (95 IV) and
5% lard stearine. Mono-and diglycerols, are added to reduce staling rate and
more functional emulsifiers, such as sodium steroyl-2-lactylate or ethoxylated or
succinylated mono-and diglycerols, are added as dough conditioners to impart
greater mixing tolerance to enable the bread to withstand abuse without loss of
loaf volume (262).
Using emulsified shortening in layer cakes, cake doughnuts, and muffins
increases volume and reduces air cell size and produces a fine internal grain.
Creaming is defined as the mixing of the shortening over wheat flour particles
and incorporating of air nuclei into the fat. The air nuclei can become sites for
gas bubble formation, which is important in cakemaking. The large number of minute air bubbles incorporated into shortening improves the leavening in baked goods.
For the shortening used in cakes and icings, small ('1 mm) needle-like b0 crystals
are preferred to the larger (515 mm) b crystals because the b0 shortenings appear
smooth, provide good aeration, and have better creaming properties (263).
Typically, partially hydrogenated soybean oil is blended with cottonseed or palm
oil hardstock to obtain b0 crystals. Most cake shortenings contain mono- and diglycerides to decrease the size of entrained air cells during creaming, to produce finer
air cells and grain in the cake crumb, and obtain a larger volume per unit weight of
batter (specific volume). To achieve proper aeration of fluid cake shortenings, however, partially hydrogenated soybean oil with b-tending soybean hardstock is
balanced with a-tending emulsifiers, which are typically mono- and di-glycerides
and glyceryl-lacto fatty esters.
Generally, plastic baking shortenings should be firm and plastic, but not brittle or
too soft and oily. Hardfat is added to soybean oil to achieve proper texture, plasticity, and creaming properties. Plastic shortenings should be soft and plastic at low
temperatures and still remain semisolid at body temperature.
Soybean oil is excellent for preparing hydrogenated base stocks from which a
wide array of shortenings is made. Up to 50% soybean hardfats are blended with
partially hydrogenated soybean oil in some shortenings. Soybean hardfats, however,
crystallize in the b polymorph unless blended with an equal or greater amount of b0
hardfat, such as hydrogenated palm or cottonseed oil. Partial hydrogenation of the
base soybean oil improves the oxidative stability of the shortening. The amount of
hardstock is varied to achieve the desired texture for the specific product application. Various kinds of baked goods need varied shortening functionalities and
OXIDATIVE QUALITY OF SOYBEAN OIL
629
plasticities to produce optimum quality. Plasticity is controlled by achieving the

proper solid fat content or solid fat index. Typical plastic shortenings should
have a relatively flat solid fat index, with solids content in the range of 15% to
30% over the temperature range of 15% C to 32% C (264). One means of getting these
properties is blending 10% hardstock from two sources to get the proper crystal
structure with 90% partially hydrogenated soybean oil (IV 6580).
11.8. Confectionery and Imitation Dairy Products, and Low-Calorie Fat
Substitutes
Very little soybean oil is used to manufacture the hard butters used in confectionery
products or imitation dairy products. For imitation chocolate, enrobing fats, coffee
whiteners, whipped toppings, imitation cheese, frozen desserts, and filled milk,
coconut and palm kernel oils are preferred because of their sharp melting points.
It is important in these applications to have very low solids at body temperature
to prevent a waxy mouthfeel. A few fractionated specialty blends of hydrogenated
soybean oil and hydrogenated cottonseed oils (265) or soybean oil that has been
hydrogenated by using sulfur-treated nickel catalysts to achieve high selectivity
(266) occasionally may be used. These fats, however, are also high in trans-fatty
acids (>40%) and new trans-fat labeling requirements discourage their use. The
advantages of imitation dairy and chocolate products are improved functionality
compared with natural products. Thus, freeze-thaw stability in whipped toppings
and melting properties can be customized for specific applications (267).
As a result of widespread concern about weight control, the production of lipid
materials with reduced or zero calories has been of special interest recently. The
lipid-based fat replacers are esters that resist enzymatic hydrolysis, are poorly
absorbed, have relatively low-energy content, or have different modes of metabolism. Many of these materials can be made from soybean oil or contain soybean oil
fatty acids. Sucrose polyester or other synthetic esters and diacylglycerol oils are
examples of these low-calorie fat substitutes (268274).
12. OXIDATIVE QUALITY OF SOYBEAN OIL
The oxidative stability of soybean oil is affected by its composition, handling of
beans prior to extraction, processing conditions, and additives. Important compositional factors in soybean oil stability include its fatty acid composition and the presence of free fatty acids, phospholipids, natural antioxidants, and pigments (275).
Important handling and processing factors include excessive bean moisture,
damage, and temperature; exposure to oxygen; contamination by pro-oxidant
metals; and exposure to light (276).
12.1. Flavor Reversion
Soybean oil has poor oxidative stability, which is a major problem for the soybean
industry. Crude soybean oil has a characteristic green-beany flavor, which is
630
SOYBEAN OIL
eliminated during refining, bleaching, and deodorization, to produce a bland-tasting, light-colored oil. During storage, however, refined soybean oil develops a characteristic flavor that often is called reversion flavor (277). Prior to the 1940s,
some believed that soybean oil reverted to its unrefined flavor after being refined
and deodorized. Soybean oil was considered extremely light sensitive, and it was
believed to revert if one carried the freshly deodorized oil past the light of a north
window. This reversion was not considered an oxidative phenomenon (278). Actually, the term reversion is a misnomer, because (1) soybean oil does not revert to
its original crude-oil flavor, (2) the effect of light is real but was greatly exaggerated, and (3) the off-flavor development is indeed an oxidative reaction (278). Procedures available for following oxidation prior to the 1940s involved an iodometric
titration to obtain a peroxide value, but this method was too insensitive to measure
the low degree of oxidation that could be detected in soybean oil by sensory examination. With the support of more sensitive methods, we now know that upon oxidation, soybean oil develops beany and grassy flavors at the early stages (i.e.,
peroxide value 10 or below), rancidity at higher levels of oxidation (peroxide value
of 10 or more), and fishy or painty flavors at the more advanced stages. These
flavor deterioration characteristics are common to all unsaturated oils containing
significant amounts of linolenate (279). It is now widely accepted that flavor deterioration of soybean oil is an oxidative phenomenon, and that linolenate is the most
important precursor of flavor reversion of soybean oil.
The technology to handle soybean oils off-flavor was discovered by an interesting set of circumstances. Near the end of World War II, Warren Goss, who was
commissioned to learn the secrets of the German oilseed industry, found that a
Dr. Tassusky and his daughter Ilona had patented a process involving multiple
washes of crude soybean oil with water or sodium silicate solution and the addition
of 0.01% citric acid to the deodorizer (278). This process worked, not because of
the washings, but because of the addition of citric acid. Now we know that trace
metals accelerate flavor deterioration and that treatment with citric acid or other
metal deactivators is a practical and effective means of improving flavor stability
(274).
12.2. Studies on Oil Oxidation
Extensive work has been done to clarify the mechanism of oil oxidation. It is a freeradical chain reaction catalyzed by light, heat, and metals, in which molecular oxygen reacts with unsaturated fatty acids to produce hydroperoxides. (280). An important factor in initiating the oxidation of unsaturated fats is by exposure to light in
the presence of oxygen and a sensitizer. The activation of ordinary triplet oxygen in
this way forms singlet oxygen, which reacts readily with unsaturated fatty acids
(281). Oxygen is quite soluble in soybean oils (282), which frequently contain natural photosensitizers, such as chlorophylls or pheophytins. Singlet oxygen readily
reacts with the double bonds of unsaturated fatty acids; for example, singlet oxygen
reacts with methyl linoleate at a rate of at least 1500 times faster than normal triplet
oxygen (282). Once oxidation is initiated by singlet oxygen, the hydroperoxides
631
that result can decompose to yield free radicals, and the reaction mode quickly
becomes autocatalytic in the presence of triplet oxygen. A study by Carlsson et
al. (283) found that the photo-oxidation of various unsaturated vegetable oils was
not retarded by known free-radical scavengers, but was retarded by compounds
known to quench singlet oxygen. Furthermore, the degree of retardation apparently
paralleled the singlet oxygen-quenching ability of these compounds.
Commonly, the fatty acids in food lipids are exposed to heat during oil
processing and food manufacture. Once peroxides are formed, they can decompose
and generate free radicals, and the rate of peroxide decomposition increases with
temperature. Such reactions are of extreme importance to both consumers and
processors, because of their flavor significance, and under frying conditions
they can affect the physical, nutritional, and toxological properties of the fried
food.
Enzymes native to plants and animals can initiate oxidation reactions. The most
important and best known of these enzymes is lipoxygenase (linoleate:oxygen oxidoreductase, E.C. 1.13.11.12) (LOX) (284, 285). Enzymatic oxidations in plant systems are mediated by lipoxygenases that use molecular oxygen to catalyze the
oxidation of lipids containing a cis, cis-1,4-pentadiene moiety, such as linoleate
and linolenate. The reaction leads to the formation of hydroperoxides, giving the
same isomers as those formed during autoxidation of linoleate and linolenate. Soybeans are a rich source of lipoxygenase isozymes known as LOX-1, LOX-2, and
LOX-3, and their activity is associated with the development of off-flavors, especially green-beany flavors, in soybean products (285).
Monohydroperoxides are the primary products of lipid oxidation. A variety of
hydroperoxides with positional and geometrical isomers are formed depending
on the position and number of double bonds of the unsaturated fatty acids and
the oxidation mechanism. A number of reviews have been published on the composition of isomeric hydroperoxides formed from oxidation of oleate, linoleate, and
linolenate (286, 287291). The hydroperoxides formed are odorless, but they are
relatively unstable and are the precursors of a variety of volatile and nonvolatile
scission products that are important to the oxidized flavor.
Secondary volatile scission products from primary hydroperoxide decomposition
include aldehydes, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, alcohols, and hydrocarbons. There are
considerable differences, however, in the flavor significance of these volatile compounds. When estimating the impact of volatile oxidation products on flavor, it is
necessary to know not only their relative concentration, but also their relative
threshold values. One way of evaluating flavor impact is to divide the concentration
by the threshold concentration, although the relative flavor impact may change with
absolute concentration (292). Also, interactions among flavor compounds in the
olfactory response may be important. The relative volatility also may play a role
if a compound must be in the gas phase to reach the olfactory organ. Lee et al.
(293) created equations to relate the flavor impact of individual volatiles, dispersed
in an oil-water emulsion, to a specific concentration of 2-heptanone (Table 21). By
this method, in a fresh and oxidized soybean oil, nonanal contributed the greatest
individual effect on the flavor intensity, followed by trans, trans- and trans,
632
SOYBEAN OIL
TABLE 21. Concentrations (ppb in emulsion) of 2-Heptanone Perceived to Have

the Same Flavor Intensity as the Components Isolated from Commercial Soybean
Oil Oxidized at 35% C Under Fluorescent Light for up to 11 Days (293).
Component
1-Penten-3-one
Pentanal
t-2-pentenal
Toluene
Hexanal
Heptanal
t-2-Heptenal
1-Octen-3-one
1-Octen-3-ol
t,c-2,4-Heptadienal
2-Pentylfuran
t,t-2,4-Heptadienal
2-Octenal
Nonanal
t,c-2,4-Decadienal
t,t-2,4-Decadienal
Total
Day
0
4
7
11
0.21
0.27
0.27
0.80
2.57
12.35
5.37
1.58
1.41
17.09
3.54
20.80
5.14
76.58
none
none
148.0
0.46
0.27
0.18
0.44
4.67
15.50
16.02
1.86
3.98
29.30
4.51
34.27
8.07
108.18
none
none
227.8
1.14
0.34
0.24
0.37
6.21
17.47
28.55
2.43
8.74
42.66
5.26
45.10
10.82
113.70
15.62
25.09
323.8
1.00
0.35
0.35
1.24
6.42
16.19
38.86
2.47
12.60
48.05
5.52
48.18
12.09
101.90
26.24
43.30
364.8
cis-2,4-heptadienal, and 2-heptenal. Hexanal produced a large GC peak, but its

effect on flavor intensity was relatively small. More recently, Kao et al. (294)
suggested that particles formed in the oral cavity could transport entrained triacylglycerols to the olfactory epithelium, allowing the triacylglycerols themselves to
impart flavor, thus implying that compounds in oxidized soybean oil do not need
to be volatile to contribute to flavor. They noted that the nutty flavor of fresh
soybean oil could only be observed when the lips were parted or the tongue drawn
away from the palate, both being conditions that generated particles. Liu and
Hammond (295) did further work to support the hypothesis that oral particles
strongly influence flavor perception of ketones typically found in oxidized soybean
oils and of flavor compounds in other foods.
Numerous studies have shown that the off-flavor intensity of soybean oil is correlated with its concentration of linolenate. Although the concentrations of both
linoleate and linolenate, which can reach 6065% in typical soybean oil, undoubtedly contribute to soybean oils instability, it is not clear why the much smaller
amount of linolenate has such a strong effect on soybean oil flavor. Linolenate is
expected to oxidize about twice as fast as linoleate, but there is seven to eight times
more linoleate than linolenate in typical soybean oil. The flavor compounds produced by linolenate do not seem to have much lower thresholds than those produced
from linoleate. Possibly flavor interactions in olfaction may account for these
effects.
633
12.3. Control/Stabilization Measures

Selective hydrogenation to lower the concentrations of linolenate or linolenate and
linoleate has been practiced to improve the oxidative stability of soybean oil. The
linolenate concentration of soybean oil also can be altered by mutation breeding
and genetic engineering (296).
Autoxidation can be inhibited or retarded by adding low concentrations of chainbreaking antioxidants that interfere with either chain propagation or initiation
(286). Chain-breaking antioxidants include phenolic and aromatic compounds hindered with bulky alkyl substituents. Common synthetic chain-breaking antioxidants
used in food lipids include butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), and propyl gallate (PG). This class
of antioxidants react with peroxy free radicals to terminate reaction chains. The
antioxidant radical (A+) formed in Equation 5 should be relatively stable and unable
to initiate or propagate the oxidation chain reaction.
ROO+ AH ! ROOH A+
The phenolic antioxidants achieve stability by forming resonance hybrids (Figure 10)
(297). A radical intermediate, such as semiquinone, can undergo a variety of
reactions, including dismutation, to form a stable quinone and can regenerate the
original hydroquinone (Figure 11). However, these antioxidants generally lose their
efficiency at elevated temperatures, and they are most effective during the induction
period. Once the antioxidant is consumed, oxidation accelerates (297).
Preventive antioxidants reduce the rate of the chain initiation. The most important initiation suppressors are metal deactivators that chelate metal ions. Metal
deactivators used for stabilizing edible fat and lipid-containing foods include citric,
phosphoric, tartaric acids, and phospholipids. Peroxide destroyers also are preventive
OH
ROO
OH
OH
ROOH +
OH
Figure 10. The formation of resonance hybrids by phenolic antioxidants.
OH
+
OH
O
+
OH
OH
Figure 11. This dismutation of a semiquinone radical intermediate.
634
SOYBEAN OIL
antioxidants; for example, the sulfur compounds, phosphates, and phosphines

reduce hydroperoxides to more stable alcohols (286).
Ultraviolet light deactivators can prevent oxidation by absorbing irradiation
without the formation of radicals. Examples include pigments such as carbon black,
phenyl salicylate, and a-hydroxybenzophenone. A significant synergistic antioxidative effect can be achieved when chain-breaking and preventive antioxidants are
used together, because they suppress both initiation and propagation. The synergistic effect of common antioxidants in combination with metal inactivators in foods
has been known for some time (33). Loliger (298) showed that the tertiary antioxidant system of Vitamin E, Vitamin C, and phospholipids provided the best protection against oxidative degradation when compared with the two antioxidants used
alone or in combination.
Light deterioration is also an important factor in the storage stability of soybean
oils. Refining and bleaching remove not only natural photosensitizers, but also singlet oxygen quenchers such as carotenoids. The restoration of the removed carotenoids may protect lipids effectively against singlet oxygen deterioration, but the
resulting yellow coloration may be objectionable to consumers. Another approach
to protecting stored oils from light is the use of a package or container that absorbs
the light necessary for photosensitization or that prevents light from reaching the
oil.
Avoiding metal contamination is also very important, as metals such as copper
and iron are strong pro-oxidants for soybean oil. Copper or iron-containing alloys,
except stainless steel, should never be used for equipment involved in direct contact
with soybean oil. Soybean oil may be stored in containers made from carbon steel
that is coated on the interior with an epoxy or polyurethane lacquer, in stainless
steel, or in fiberglass-reinforced polyester.
Displacement of oxygen in container headspaces by nitrogen or carbon dioxide
to , 2% has been shown to reduce oxidation effectively in vegetable oil (299).
Therefore, nitrogen or other inert gas protection should be considered whenever
the oil is to be stored for an extended period or held in the hot, liquid state.
12.4. Evaluation of Finished Oil Quality
Regardless of the official specifications for soybean oil and its products, the ultimate proof of the pudding is in the eating; that is, sensory evaluation of the odors
and flavors of soybean oil and its products is the ultimate method to assess oil quality and stability. Sensory evaluation cannot be replaced fully by any chemical or
instrumental analysis, although some methods can correlate fairly well with sensory
results. Sensory evaluation of oils usually is done by a panel of experts or a trained
panel, and often the method recommended by the American Oil Chemists Society
(300) is used. During the evaluation, the panel is asked to score the overall flavor
quality, as well as the intensity of many individual off-flavors. Although chemical
and physical tests are more reproducible and less time consuming than sensory evaluations, oxidative rancidity and off-flavor evaluation of soybean oils are best done
by sensory tests. Correlations established between sensory evaluation scores and
635
various chemical tests, however, can be used to predict the sensory quality of finished oil products.
Peroxide value, expressed as milliequivalents of peroxide per kilogram of oil,
measures the primary oxidation products of oilsthe hydroperoxides. The peroxide
value has shown a particularly good correlation with sensory flavor scores of soybean oil, and its use during storage is quite common. The peroxide value is an index
to the oxidative state of an oil. Soybean oil is considered fresh with a peroxide
value <1.0 mEq/kg, to have low oxidation with 1.05.0 mEq/kg, to have moderate
oxidation at 5.010.0 mEq/kg, to have high oxidation at >10.0 mEq/kg, and to have
poor flavor quality at >20 mEq/kg (6). Several methods (300303) can be used to
measure the peroxide value of an oil depending on the specific circumstance.
One of the first steps in the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids is a shift in
the position of double bonds, resulting in the formation of conjugated hydroperoxides. The conjugated structure absorbs strongly at a wavelength of 232234 nm.
The conjugated diene value (300) is expressed as the percentage of conjugated dienoic acid in the oil and is an indication of initial or primary oxidation products.
Conjugated diene value can be used as a comparative method only when the oils
have the same initial fatty acid composition, because the greater the amount of
polyenoates in an oil, the greater the potential rise in the conjugated diene value.
As a result, this method should be used as a relative measurement of oxidation in an
oil only if the fatty acid composition is known (303).
As aldehydes and some ketones have long been identified as oxidation and
breakdown products of fats, their determination also has been common in soybean
oil quality control. The p-anisidine value (300) measures light absorbance of aldehydes, primarily 2-alkenals, and 2,4-dienals at 350 nm. However, this measure is
not entirely specific, because the color intensity developed depends not only on
the concentration but also on the structure of the aldehyde. Therefore, the results
are comparable only within oils of similar type and treatment (304).
Free fatty acid (305), polar compounds (300), viscosity, and color analyses are
often performed to determine the degree of abuse that oils receive during heating or
frying. They are important indicators of frying oil quality, because these components affect the quality of the fried food. The free fatty acid increase during frying
indicates released from triacylglyceride ester linkages via hydrolysis (233). Thus, it
is an important marker for oil quality. Abused frying oil should be discarded if it
contains >27% total polar compounds, according to a German standard of frying
oil quality (306). Changes in viscosity and color of the frying oil also are used as
indicators of the extent of frying oil degradation.
There are many other methods for measuring lipid oxidation and quality by chemical means. Among the best-known procedures are the thiobarbituric acid (TBA)
test, carbonyl value, and headspace oxygen analysis. These methods have been
reviewed and discussed elsewhere (287, 307).
The volatile carbonyl compounds formed during oxidation of fats and oils are
major contributors to off-flavor development. Therefore, there have been significant
efforts at identifying and quantifying these compounds. It is difficult to analyze
these compounds in fats and oils for several reasons. First, it is difficult to remove
636
SOYBEAN OIL
them quantitatively from the fats and oils. Second, widespread contamination by
carbonyls in solvents, glassware, and other laboratory materials may cause artifacts.
Finally, hundreds of volatile compounds may be formed in fats and oils during oxidation causing difficulties in the interpretation. Today, the use of efficient gas chromatography (GC) columns and proper means of identification has made reliable
volatile compound analysis become possible.
Three basic GC procedures are generally employed (300), including static headspace, dynamic headspace, and direct injection. Static headspace involves equilibration of gases from the area above a liquid sample; a set volume of the
headspace gas from the sample is then injected directly into the GC for separation
and quantification. The dynamic headspace method, also known as purge and trap,
employs a sorbent, such as Tenax GC, Chromosorb, or Porapak Q, to collect volatile compounds that are swept from a heated sample with an inert gas such as
helium or nitrogen. After trapping, the sorbent may be extracted with solvent, or
transferred directly to the GC inlet port. In direct injection, an oil sample may be
injected directly into the port of the GC through a silanized glass wool plug. Each
of these methods has their own advantages and disadvantages (287).
Recently, the method of gas chromatographic solid-phase microextraction (GCSPME) has been developed (308310). This method uses fibers coated with various
polymers to extract volatile compounds from a food system. The method can be
used in solid, liquid, and gaseous systems. It is fairly easy to evaluate volatile compounds by this analysis and to maintain consistent conditions.
Evans et al. (311) and Scholz and Ptak (312) used GC analysis of n-pentane as a
measurement of rancidity of vegetable oils. Dupuy et al. (313, 314) determined the
volatile carbonyl compounds from soybean oil using a modified gas chromatographic inlet tube and found good correlations between the volatile profile analysis
and sensory scores. The Flavor Quality and Stability Committee of the AOCS evaluated GC volatile profiling as a standard method of flavor evaluation (275). As a
result, they wrote two Recommended Practices, entitled Volatiles in Fats and
Oils by Gas-Liquid Chromatography Cg 4-94, 1997 (300) and Correlation of
Oil Volatiles with Flavor Scores of Edible Oils AOCS method Cg 1-83, 1997
(300). These AOCS methods were validated in an AOCS collaborative study on
sensory and volatile analyses, in which three methods of volatile compound analyses were compared with sensory analyses by using the AOCS flavor scales
(315). Despite agreement on the usefulness of these methods, the committee
stressed that only humans can measure flavor, thus these volatile GC methods measured features such as oxidative stability and compound breakdownnot sensory
perceptions per se.
Not surprisingly, heat treatment, such as commercial and household frying,
accelerates autoxidation. In addition to undergoing autoxidation, when fats are
heated in the presence of moisture, as often is the case in food applications, fatty
acids are released via hydrolysis of the ester linkages (233). The free fatty acids can
accelerate oxidation of the oil. During heat treatment, the formation of dimeric and
cyclic compounds seems to be the predominant thermolytic reaction of unsaturated
fatty acids. In the presence of oxygen during heat treatment, however, oxidative
637
polymerization also can occur (233). Obviously, temperature, heating time, availability of oxygen, etc. can largely influence the extent to which these thermal and
oxidative polymerization reactions occur.
Decomposition and condensation of hydroperoxides also produces a multitude
of nonvolatile monomeric products, including di- and tri-oxygenated esters, and
dimeric and polymeric materials, especially at elevated temperature. Many of these
dimers and polymers are known to be rich sources of volatile carbonyl compounds
and to decrease the flavor and oxidative stability of soybean oil (316). These highmolecular-weight materials also can produce a series of physical and chemical
changes to the oil and food products, including increased viscosity, polarity, free
acid content, development of dark color, and an increased tendency of the oil to
foam (233).
12.5. Storage and Handling
Production of good quality soybean oil requires close control from harvesting of the
soybeans, during bean storage, during and after oil processing, through consumption of the finished oil products to guard against oxidative, enzymatic, and microbiological deterioration. Good processing measures include careful control of
refining temperature, vacuum bleaching, and inert gas blanketing. Heat accelerates
the reaction of atmospheric oxygen with edible oils, therefore, localized overheating is detrimental to final oil quality. After processing, soybean oil should be stored
at as low a temperature as possible and practical, and with protection from light.
Vacuum conditions are very important during bleaching, because oxidation can
readily occur by exposure of a large surface area to air at elevated temperatures.
During storage, a package containing the maximum amount of oil is preferable,
because oxygen availability is lower with a lower headspace-to-oil ratio. Peroxide
formation also is a linear function of surface-to-volume ratio (275). According to
List (317), in field storage tanks, the oil is also subjected to conditions that cause
development of sizable temperature gradients that can produce considerable internal oil movement. Such movement would be expected to increase the quantity of oil
available at the surface and to accelerate oxygen diffusion. Therefore, soybean oil
stored in filled tanks should be at as low a temperature as possible to avoid such
conditions.
12.6. Special Processing for Off-Specification Oil
Oils from field-, frost-, moisture-, and storage-damaged beans usually have higher
levels of free fatty acids and iron, lower levels of phosphorous, darker colors, and
poorer flavor and oxidative stability in the finished products than do oils from undamaged beans. Such beans are difficult to process, and standard processing methods
usually do not produce finished oils that can meet soybean oil specifications for
trading or domestic consumption.
The National Soybean Processors Association (318) trading rules specify that
prime crude oils, after refining and bleaching by an official method (300), must
638
SOYBEAN OIL
meet a Lovibond color level of 6.0. Frost-damaged oils often will not meet this
requirement. Oils from frost-damaged beans tend to have an undesirable green color in the crude oils caused by compounds related to, but not identical to, chlorophyll
(includes pheophytin) or some of its derivatives, according to Stern and Grossman
(319). When bleaching such oils, acid-activated clays are more efficient than neutral
clays and increased amounts of bleaching earth make the removal of the green color
more effective. According to Stern and Grossman (319), pretreatment with charcoal
(0.41.0%) at 90% C or treatment of a cold hexane-oil mixture with charcoal is effective in partly removing the green pigment. When charcoal pretreatment is combined
with additional treatment from sugars and activated bleaching clays, complete
removal of green pigments is possible. Hydrogenation can also be used to remove
green color from soybean oil. According to Beal et al. (175), a green oil (IV 132)
hydrogenated to IV 110 in the presence of 1% copper chromate catalyst was no
longer green after cooling and filtration. However, the use of copper chromate is
not a common practice.
When soybeans are exposed to rain or humid weather in the field, the beans tend
to sprout and decay, and the oil from these beans develops a dark-brown color and
chalky texture (312). Drought stress affects protein and oil content of soybeans but
seldom damages oil quality significantly. According to List (317), off-specification
oils from field-, frost-, heat-, and moisture-damaged soybeans result in high refining
losses during processing, poor refined-bleached color, and lowered flavor and oxidative stability. High refining losses may be partly overcome by use of phosphoric
acid or acetic anhydride degumming. Color problems of oils from damaged beans
may be alleviated, in part, by use of acidic bleaching earths, increased amounts of
bleaching earths, and higher bleaching temperatures. Overall, however, the best
practice for producing high-quality oil is to segregate the bad beans and not include
them in the processing.
13. DIETARY FATTY ACIDS AND THEIR HEALTH EFFECTS
13.1. Cholesterol and Heart Disease
Heart disease is still the number one cause of death for both men and women in the
United States. High-blood-cholesterol levels increase the risk of getting heart disease (319), so, generally, serum (blood) cholesterol is measured to determine a persons risk of developing heart disease. Although some cholesterol is essential in
forming the bodys cell membranes and synthesizing hormones and bile acids,
too much cholesterol is associated with heart disease. The fat eaten can affect
the blood-cholesterol level. In addition to monitoring total blood cholesterol, the
ratio of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) to low-density lipoproteins (LDL) of the
blood also is important in predicting heart disease. As cholesterol, a waxy substance, does not mix with water, it needs help circulating through blood, which
is mostly water. Lipoproteins transport cholesterol throughout the body. Low-density lipoproteins carry cholesterol from the liver to the body and leave deposits on
artery walls. High-density lipoproteins carry cholesterol back to the liver for
DIETARY FATTY ACIDS AND THEIR HEALTH EFFECTS
639
elimination. If the ratio of low/high-density lipoproteins becomes too large, it is

likely that more cholesterol will be deposited in the arteries than is removed. So
the low/high-density lipoprotein ratio also may be used to predict a persons
chances of developing heart disease. A ratio greater than 3 can indicate above average risk. The most important dietary influences on blood cholesterol levels are saturated fat, total fat, and dietary cholesterol.
13.2. Saturated Fat and Health Effects
Saturated fat has more impact on raising blood cholesterol levels than anything else
in the diet. The most effective way to reduce the blood cholesterol level is to reduce
the amount of saturated fat in the diet. Animal products are a major source of saturated fat in the average American diet. A very few vegetable oils, including coconut, palm kernel, and palm oils, are rich in saturated fat. Other vegetable oils,
including soybean oil, can become saturated by hydrogenation. Consumption of
too much saturated fat has been associated with the development of heart disease,
some cancers, and other health problems. As soybean oil is the major edible oil
consumed in the United States, lowering its saturated fat could help reduce heart
disease in this country, even though its total saturated fatty acid composition is
only about 15% to 16%. As noted, the major saturates in soybean oil are palmitate
and stearate. Palmitate is responsible for about 70% of the total saturated fat in soybean oil. Substitution of palmitate for carbohydrates or monounsaturates in the diet
increased levels of serum low-density lipoproteins and total cholesterol (320). Stearate has been found to be relatively neutral in its effects on blood lipids, and some
researchers (321, 322) showed that dietary stearate actually lowered serum lowdensity lipoproteins and total cholesterol levels; thus, many people recommend
that this saturate not be included in the category of hypercholesterolemic acyl
groups. It was for these reasons that Iowa State University scientists developed
LoSatSoyTM, a soybean oil with half the saturated fat of conventional soybean
oil, with reduction of palmitate to <'3%.
13.3. Unsaturated Fat and Health Effects
Unsaturated fats, classified as either monounsaturated or polyunsaturated, can help
lower the cholesterol levels in blood when substituted for saturated fats. Sources of
monounsaturated fat include nuts, olive oil, and canola oil. Sources of polyunsaturated fat include corn, safflower, sesame, soybean, and sunflower oils.
Soybean oil contains about 21% of the monounsaturate oleate. Studies have
shown that the oxidation rate of oleate is much slower than that of the polyunsaturates, linoleate and linolenate, which oxidize quickly and are the major contributors
to the poor stability of soybean oil (287, 323). A diet high in monounsaturates may
help to reduce elevated levels of total plasma cholesterol without reducing the highdensity lipoprotein-cholesterol level (324). Therefore, high-oleate soybean oil is not
only more stable than conventional soybean oil (275), but also has enhanced nutritive value.
640
SOYBEAN OIL
In both clinical trials and population studies, polyunsaturated fats in the diet
have been shown to actively lower serum cholesterol levels. Soybean oil is considered to have good nutritive value mainly because of its high concentration of essential polyunsaturates. As noted previously, it contains about 55% linoleate and 8%
linolenate, both recognized as essential fatty acids. Ingestion of approximately
12% of daily calories as linoleate is widely accepted as the amount needed to
meet the essential fatty acid requirement of rodent species and humans (325).
The physiological effects of linoleate have been well characterized. Various
deficiency symptoms include depressed growth, scaly dermatoses, increased skin
permeability, fatty liver, kidney damage, and impaired reproduction. The 8%
linolenate of soybean oil, makes it not only an excellent source of essential fatty
acids, but also a member of the n-3 fatty acid group (the third carbon atom from
the terminal end of the hydrocarbon chain is involved in a double bond). A number
of health benefits have been associated with the consumption of foods or oils that
contain n-3 fatty acids. These associations originally derived from epidemiological
studies of Eskimos who consumed high levels of n-3 fatty acid from seals and
coldwater fish (326). Compared with Danish counterparts, these Eskimos were
found to have a low incidence of heart disease and immune system diseases,
although a somewhat higher level of hemorrhagic stroke. Still today, large-scale
epidemiological studies suggest that individuals at risk for CHD benefit from the
consumption of plant- and marine-derived n-3 fatty acids (327).
13.4. Trans-Fatty Acids and Their Health Effects
The process of catalytic hydrogenation of vegetable oils was discovered in 1897 to
reduce the polyunsaturates and to improve flavor stability, versatility, and performance of vegetable oils in salad dressings, during cooking, in deep-fat-frying,
and for the manufacture of margarines, shortenings, and other baking and snack
food applications (328). A side reaction that occurs during hydrogenation is the formation of positional and geometrical isomers of the unsaturated sites that are left
unsaturated. Formation of trans-isomers is rapid and extensive (320). Although
hydrogenation can improve soybean oil oxidative stability and performance versatility, the presence of the trans-fatty acids may make hydrogenated oils nutritionally
undesirable. In particular, the role of partially hydrogenated soybean oil in nutrition
has been under scrutiny because of the health concerns over the presence of transacyl groups in our diets (329); however, the biological significance of these transacyl groups is unclear. The formation of trans-acyl groups in vegetable oils also can
occur, to a small extent, during deodorization (330, 331) and during frying (332,
333). The 9-cis,12-trans-linoleate is present in most vegetable shortenings in
much greater quantities than the 9-trans,12-trans-linoleic acid (334). In heated
vegetable oils, the isomers just mentioned have been reported, plus trans-, cis-isomers of linolenate (330, 332, 335). Trans-isomers are essential fatty acid antagonists, especially when the linoleate and linolenate are limited in the diet. For
example, the cis, cis, trans-isomer of 18:3 is elongated and desaturated to form
n-3 trans-isomers of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 in rats (336); isomers that also have
REFERENCES
641
been found in human platelets (337). The 9-cis,12-trans-linoleic acid can be converted to 20:4n-6 containing a trans-double bond. Unfortunately, this trans-isomer
of 20:4n-6 inhibited the formation of prostaglandins from all-cis-20:4n-6 (338).
Mensink and Katan (250) reported that a diet high in trans-acyl groups raised total
and low/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio compared with a diet high in cisacyl groups may be more cholesterolemic than saturates (339), and were linked to
an increased risk of breast cancer development (340).
The estimated trans-acyl group intake by typical U.S. consumers is 11.127.6 g/
person/day (341). A comprehensive review concluded that trans-acyl groups consumed at 4.0% or more of total calories may raise plasma lipid levels (342). As a
result of health concerns over the presence of trans-acyl groups in our diet, modifying fatty acid composition of soybean oil to improve its oxidative and flavor
stability in ways similar to that obtained by hydrogenation, but without transformation, has become an objective of plant breeders.
13.5. Total Fat and Its Health Effects
Excessive intake of any fat is not healthy. According to Klurfeld and Kritchevsky
(342), the enhancement of tumor growth by dietary fat may result, in part, from the
caloric contribution of this nutrient. Significant reduction of tumor incidence with
consumption of 25% less energy was seen consistently in rat tumor systems induced
by chemicals. Currently, most American children get about 34% of their calories
from fat (318). It is recommended, however, that healthy childrens intake of fat
average no more than 30% of calories. Experts also suggest lowering childrens
saturated fat intake to less than 10% of calories. Similar recommendations have
been made for adults (343).
REFERENCES
1. Economic Research Service of United States Department of Agriculture. (October,
2002). Oil Crop Situation and Outlook Yearbook. Available: http://usda.mannlib.
cornell.edu/reports/erssor/field/ocs-bby/ocs2002.pdf.
2. 2004 Soya & Oilseed Bluebook, Soyatech, Inc., Bar Harbor, Maine, 2003.
3. T. J. Brumm and C. R. Hurburgh, Jr., Quality of the 2002 Soybean Crop from the
United States, Report to the American Soybean Association.
4. D. M. Maestrl, J. M. Mariles, and C. A. Guzma n, Grassas Aceites, 49, 395399 (1998).
5. C. R. Hurburgh, Jr., J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 71, 14251427 (1994).
6. D. M. Maestri, D. O. Labuckas, J. M. Meriles, A. L. Lamarque, J. A. Zygadlo, and C. A.
Guzman, J. Sci. Food Agric., 77, 494498 (1998).
7. R. F. Wilson, Agro-Food Industry Hi-Tech., 12(6), 1722 (2002).
8. R. F. Wilson, Lipid Technol., 11, 107110 (2000).
9. J. A. Hoeck, W. R. Fehr, P. A. Murphy, and G. A. Welke, Crop Sci., 40, 4851 (2000).
10. J.-S. Choi, T.-W. Kwon, and J.-S. Kim, Food Biotechnol., 5, 167169 (1996).
642
SOYBEAN OIL
11. C. Tsukamoto, S. Shimada, K. Igita, S. Kudou, M. Kokubun, K. Okubo, and

K. Kitamura, J. Agric. Food Chem., 43, 11841192 (1995).
12. T. Wang, Phospholipid fatty acid composition of modified soybeans and the effect of
saturated fatty acid content on seed performance, Ph.D. Dissertation, Iowa State
University, Ames, Iowa, 1998.
13. T. Gutfinger and A. Letan, Lipids, 9, 658663 (1974).
14. M. Bastic , L. J. Bastic , J. A. Javanovic , and G. Spiteller, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 55,
886891 (1978).
15. J. D. Weete and R. C. Manley, J. Ala. Acad. Sci., 50, 3546 (1979).
16. T. L. Mounts, S. L. Abidi, and K. A. Rennick, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 73, 581586
(1996).
17. J. L. Weihrauch and J. M. Gardner, J. Amer. Diet. Assoc., 73, 39 47 (1978).
18. C. D. Evans, G. R. List, R. E. Beal, and L. T. Black, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 51, 444448
(1974).
19. G. R. List, A. J. Heakin, C. D. Evans, L. T. Black, and T. L. Mounts, J. Amer. Oil Chem.
Soc., 55, 521522 (1978).
20. G. O. Almonor, G. P. Fenner, and R. F. Wilson, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 591596
(1998).
21. C. Vlahakis and J. Hazebroek, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 77, 4953 (2000).
22. K. L. McCord, W. R. Fehr, T. Wang, G. A. Welke, S. R. Cianzio, and S. R. Schnebly,
Crop Sci., 44, 772776 (2004).
23. S.-N. Ko, C.-J. Kim, H. Kim, C.-T. Kim, S.-H. Chung, B.-S. Tae, and I.-H. Kim, J. Amer.
Oil Chem. Soc., 80, 585589 (2003).
24. L. H. Wiedermann, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 58, 159166 (1981).
25. S. Ramamurthi, A. R. McCurdy, and R. T. Tyler, in S. S. Koseoglu, K. C. Rhee, and
R. F. Wilson, eds., Proc. World Conf. Oilseed Edible Oils Process, vol. 1, AOCS Press,
Champaign, Illinois, 1998, pp. 130134.
26. Yearbook and Trading Rules, National Oilseed Processors Association, Washington,
D.C., 1993.
27. H. Klein, Erna hrung/Nutrition, 23, 452460 (1999).
28. D. M. Maestri, D. O. Labuckas, C. A. Guzma n, and L. M. Glorda, Grasas Aceites, 49,
450453 (1998).
29. J. Siebrecht and J. Hazebroek, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 989998 (1997).
30. X. Wu, E. G. Hammond, P. J. White, and W. Fehr, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 1099
1103 (1997).
31. F. G. Sietz, Fette Scifen Anstrichm., 67, 411412 (1965).
32. M. Wesolowski, Food Sci.Technol., 95, 377383 (1993).
33. X. Ndzana, W. R. Fehr, G. A. Welke, E. G. Hammond, D. N. Duvick, and S. R. Cianzio,
Crop Sci., 34, 646649 (1994).
34. S. R. Schnebly, W. R. Fehr, G. A. Welke, E. G. Hammond, and D. N. Duvick, Crop Sci.,
36, 14621466 (1996).
35. G. L. Graef, L. A. Miller, W. R. Fehr, and E. G. Hammond, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 62,
773775 (1985).
36. T. Wang, E. G. Hammond, and W. R. Fehr, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 78, 11391144 (2001).
REFERENCES
643
37. A. J. Kinney, J. Food Lipids, 3, 273292 (1996).

38. W. R. Fehr and E. G. Hammond (to Iowa State University Research Foundation), U.S.
Patent 5,534,425, July 9, 1996.
39. R. F. Wilson, J. W. Burton, V. R. Pantalone, and R. E. Dewey, Lipid Biotechnology,
Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 95113.
40. T. F. Horejsi, W. R. Fehr, G. A. Welke, D. N. Duvick, E. G. Hammond, and S. R. Cianzio,
Crop Sci., 34, 331334 (1994).
41. R. B. Hartmann, W. R. Fehr, G. A. Welke, E. G. Hammond, D. N. Duvick, and S. R.
Cianzio, Crop Sci., 36, 14661470 (1996).
42. T. Wang, T. Harp, E. G. Hammond, J. S. Burris, and W. R. Fehr, Seed Sci. Res., 11, 9397
(2001).
43. W. R. Fehr, J. C. Thorne, and E. G. Hammond, Crop Sci., 11, 211213 (1971).
44. G. Ishikawa, H. Hasegawa, Y. Takagi, and T. Tanisaka, Plant Breeding, 120, 417423
(2001).
45. T. K. Harp and E. G. Hammond, Lipids, 33, 209216 (1998).
46. T. Wang, unpublished results, September 2003.
47. C. Litchfield, Analysis of Triglycerides, Academic Press, New York, 1972, pp. 233264.
48. W. E., Neff, G. R. List, and W. C. Byrdwell, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Related. Technol., 22,
16491662 (1999).
49. W. E. Neff and W. C. Byrdwell, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 72, 11851191 (1995).
50. T. Wang, E. G. Hammond, and W. R. Fehr, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 15871594
(1997).
51. T. Wang, E. G. Hammond, J. L. Cornette, and W. R. Fehr, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 76,
13131321 (1999).
52. T. L. Mounts and A. M. Nash, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 67, 757760 (1990).
53. G. R. List, T. L. Mounts, and A. C. Lanser, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 69, 443446 (1992).
54. E. Gutierrez, Method Development for Sphingolipid Quantification in Soybeans and Soy
Products, M. S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 2003.
55. V. Piironen, T. Koivu, O. Tammisalo, and P. Mattila, Food Chem., 59, 473480 (1997).
56. T. Yamagami, M. Aoyama, T. Tsutsumi, S. Tokairin, H. Ehara, T. Maruyama, and
I. Niiya, Yukagakkaishi, 48, 12711274 (1999).
57. T. Yamagami, M. Aoyama, T. Tsutsumi, S. Tokairin, H. Ehara, T. Maruyama, and
I. Niiya, Chem. Abstr., 132, 77768 (2000).
58. T. Koivu, V. Piironen, A.-M. Lampi, and P. Mattila, J. Food Chem., 64, 411414
(1999).
59. R. F. Wilson, J. W. Burton, W. P. Novitzky, and R. E. Dewey, J. Oleo Sci., 50, 353358
(2001).
60. K. Warner, P. Orr, and M. Glynn, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 347356 (1997).
61. H. Guth and W. Grosch, Fat Sci. Technol., 93, 249255 (1991).
62. J.-W. Kao, X. Wu, E. G. Hammond, and P. J. White, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 831
835 (1998).
63. J. deD. Alvarado, Grasas Aceites, 46, 264269 (1995).
64. J. deD. Alvarado, Chem. Abstr., 124, 200581 (1996).
644
SOYBEAN OIL
65. V. V. Kravchenko, A. K. Pugach, and V. Z. Geller, Izv. Vysshikh, Uchebnykh, Zavedenii,

Pishchevaya Tekhnol., 1987, 7981 (1987).
66. V. V. Kravchenko, A. K. Pugach, and V. Z. Geller, Chem. Abstr., 108, 54638 (1987).
67. H. Noureddini, B. C. Teoh, and L. D. Clements, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 69, 11841188
(1992).
68. Y. Tochitani and M. Fujimoto, Netsu Bussei, 15, 230236 (2001).
69. Y. Ali, M. A. Hanna, and S. L. Cuppett, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 72, 15571564 (1995).
70. R. Sh. Kuliev, F. R. Shirinov, and F. A. Kuliev, Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils., 35, 235237
(1999).
71. H. Koseki, Y. Natsume, and Y. Iwata, J. Fire Sci., 19, 3144 (2001).
72. E. W. Washburn, ed. International Critical Tables, vol. 5, McGraw-Hill, New York,
1929, pp. 162169.
73. K. S. Miller, B. E. Farkas, and R. P. Singh, J. Food Process. Preservation., 18, 461472
(1994).
74. E. S. Perry, W. H. Weber, and B. F. Daubert, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 71, 37203726 (1949).
75. A. Tekin and E. G. Hammond, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 737740 (1998).
76. S. B. Detwiler, Jr. and K. S. Markley, Oil & Soap, 17, 3940 (1940).
77. K. Yokota and M. Tachimori, Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi, 40 (Suppl. binding) 426429 (1937).
78. K. Yokota and M. Tachimori, Chem. Abstr., 32, 13680 (1937).
79. J. D. Halvorsen, W. C. Mammel, Jr., and L. D. Clements, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 70,
875880 (1993).
80. C. M. Rodenbush, F. H. Hsieh, and D. S. Viswanath, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 76, 1415
1419 (1999).
81. H. F. Johnstone and I. H. Spoor, Ind. Eng. Chem., 32, 832835 (1940).
82. F. C. Magne and E. L. Skau, Ind. Eng. Chem., 37, 10971102 (1945).
83. L. K. Arnold and L. J. Breuklander, Iowa Acad. Sci., 57, 157160 (1950).
84. F. C. Magne, E. J. Hughes, and E. L. Skau, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 27, 552555 (1950).
85. P. E. Clark, C. R. Waldeland, and R. P. Cross, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 38, 350353 (1946).
86. T. Kasprzycka-Guttman and D. Odzeniak, Thermochimica Acta, 191, 4145 (1991).
87. T. Wang and J. L. Briggs, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 79, 831836 (2002).
88. N. A. Morad, A. A. Mustafa Kamal, F. Panau, and T. W. Yew, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.,
77, 10011105 (2000).
89. Y. Hagura and K. Suzuki, Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, 49, 272276 (2002).
90. Y. Hagura and K. Suzuki, Chem. Abstr., 138, 38393 (2003).
91. V. Chioffi, Chim. Provinciali, 12, 123136 (1961).
92. G. J. Arissen, Verfkroniek, 6, 911 (1996).
93. D. B. Dahlberg, S. M. Lee, S. J. Wenger, and J. A. Vargo, Applied Spectroscopy, 51,
11181124 (1997).
94. I. Boyaci, A. Tekin, M. C izmeci, and I. Javidpour, J. Food Lipids, 9, 175183 (2002).
95. J. A. Ibemesi and I. O. Igwe, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 68, 147152 (1991).
96. S. Z. Erhan, S. Asaduauskas, and A. Adhvaryu, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 79, 11571161
(2002).
97. E. G. Hammond and W. O. Lundberg, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 31, 427432 (1954).
REFERENCES
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
645
K. R. Majors and R. T. Milner, Oil & Soap, 16, 228231 (1939).

Y. Maruta and K. Tenurama, Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi, 40 (Suppl), 299 (1937).
Y. Maruta and K. Tenurama, Chem. Abstr., 31, 65303 (1937).
J. R. Dafler, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 52, 425426 (1975).
C. F. Cole, G. M. Hill, and A. J. Adams, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 71, 13391342 (1994).
Y. H. Chu, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 68, 379384 (1991).
C. Inoue, Y. Hagura, M. Ishikawa, and K. Suzuki, J. Food Sci., 67, 11261129 (2002).
N. Tomoto and K. Kusano, Yukagaku, 16, 108113 (1967).
N. Tomoto and K. Kusano, Chem. Abstr., 66, 106141 (1967).
M. Loncin, Fette Seifen Anstrichm., 57, 413415 (1955).
A. S. Smith and F. J. Wechter, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 27, 381383 (1950).
A. S. Smith, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 28, 360361 (1951).
A. S. Smith, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 28, 356359 (1951).
K. Kusano, Yukagaku, 8, 814 (1959).
K. Kusano, Chem. Abstr., 54, 2002060 (1960).
A. I. Anikin, G. N. Danilova, and V. V. Klyuchkin, Izvestiaya Vysshikh Ucbebnykh,
Zavedenii Pishchevaya Tekhnologiya, 4345 (1987).
A. I. Anikin, G. N. Danilova, and V. V. Klyuchkin, Chem. Abstr., 108, 54636 (1988).
C. Aberhard and Z. Spekuljak, Revista Facultad Ingenieria Quimica, 48, 712 (1988).
C. Aberhard and Z. Spekuljak, Chem. Abstr., 112, 156952 (1990).
W. H. Dickhart, Amer. J. Pharm., 104, 284 (1932).
G.-C. Yen, C. H. Shao, C. J. Chen, and P. D. Duh, Food Sci. Technol., 30, 648652
(1997).
B. Kowalski, Thermochimica Acta, 173, 117127 (1990).
V. Barquin, Tecnicas Laboratorio, 11, 345349 (1987).
M. Wakakura, Kenkyu Hokoku-Kanagawa-ken Kogyo Shikensho, 55, 7677 (1984).
M. Wakakura, Chem. Abstr., 103, 217718 (1985).
Federal Grain Inspection Service, Federal Grain Inspection Handbook, Washington,
D.C., 1990.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available: http://www.usda.gov/gipsa/referencelibrary/brochures/soyinsepction.pfd.
T. J. Brumm and C. R. Hurburgh, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 67, 302307 (1990).
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois. Available: http://www.stratsoy.uiuc.
edu/epv/.
T. L. Mounts, G. R. List, and A. J. Heakin, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 56, 883885 (1979).
G. R. List C. D. Evans, K. Warner, R. E. Beal, W. F. Kwiolek, L. T. Black, and K. J.
Moulton, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 54, 814 (1977).
C. R. Hurburgh, T. J. Brumm, J. M. Quin, and R. A. Hartwig, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 67,
966973 (1990).
E. G. Hammond, L. A. Johnson, and P. A. Murphy, in C. Wrigley, C. Walker, and
H. Corke, eds., Encyclopaedia of Grain Sciences, Academic Press, London, 2003.
P. Golbitz, 2003 Soya & Oilseed Bluebook, Soyatech, Inc., Bar Harbor, Maine,
2003.
646
SOYBEAN OIL
132. D. Erickson, ed., Handbook of Soybean Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press,
Champaign, Illinois, 1995.
133. L. A. Johnson, in P. J. Wan and W. Farr, eds., Introduction to Fats and Oils, AOCS Press,
134. L. A. Johnson, in C. Akoh and D. Min., eds., Food Lipids, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker,
New York, 2002, pp. 223273.
135. T. J. Brumm, C. R. Hurburgh, and L. A. Johnson, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 67, 750756
(1990).
136. J. M. Guinn, American Soybean Association, St. Louis, MO. (2002). Available: http://
www.asasoya.org/Import/Guinn_Quality_Standards_Trading_Rules2002.htm.
137. L. A. Johnson and E. W. Lusas, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 60, 181A193A (1983).
138. R. J. Hron, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 59, 674A684A (1982).
139. P. J. Wan and P. J. Wakelyn, eds., Technology and Solvents for Extracting Oilseeds and
Nonpetroleum Oils, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1997.
140. R. D. Good, Oil Mill Gaz., 75(3), 1417 (1970).
141. F. McDonald, Oil Mill Gaz., 84(12), 25 (1980).
142. M. A. Williams, Oil Mill Gaz., 91(5), 2429 (1986).
143. M. A. Williams, INFORM, 6(3), 289293 (1995).
144. E. W. Lusas and L. R. Watkins, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 65, 11071114 (1988).
145. National Oilseed Processors Association, Washington, D.C. (2002). Available: http://
www.asasoya.org/Import/Guinn_Quality_Standards_Trading_Rules2002.htm.
146. A. I. Nelson, W. B. Wijeratne, S. W. Yeh, T. M. Wei, and L. S. Wei, J. Amer. Oil Chem.
Soc., 64, 13411347 (1987).
147. N. W. Said, INFORM, 9(2), 139144 (1997).
148. T. Wang, L. A. Johnson, and W. Wijeratne, in N. T. Dunford and H. B. Dunford, eds.,
Nutritionally Enhanced Edible Oil Processing, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 2004,
p. 219238.
149. T. Wang and L. A. Johnson, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 78, 311318 (2001).
150. T. Wang and L. A. Johnson, in Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on
Environmental Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2003.
151. L. A. Johnson, D. J. Myers, and D. J. Burden, INFORM, 3, 282290 (1992).
152. L. A. Johnson, D. J. Myers, and D. J. Burden, INFORM, 3, 429444 (1992).
153. J. C. Endres, Soy Protein Products: Characteristics, Nutritional Aspects, and Utilization.
AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 2001.
154. C. T. Egger and R. E. Olson (assigned to Grain Processing Corporation, Muscatine,
Iowa), U.S. Patent 3,849,391, November 19, 1974.
155. C. Y. Wang and L. A. Johnson, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 78, 189195 (2001).
156. P. A. Howard, M. Campbell, and D. T. Zollinger (assigned to Central Soya Co., Ft.
Wayne, Indiana), U.S. Patent Re. 32,725, August 2, 1988.
157. S. Wu, P. A. Murphy, L. A. Johnson, A. R. Fratzke, and M. A. Reuber, J. Amer. Oil Chem.
Soc., 76, 285293 (1999).
158. S. Wu, P. A. Murphy, L. A. Johnson, M. A. Fratzke, and M. A. Reuber, J. Agric. Food
Chem., 48, 27022708 (2000).
159. K. H. Lee, H. S. Ryu, and K. C. Rhee, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 80, 8590 (2003).
REFERENCES
647
160. National Archives and Records Administration, Federal Register, 64, (206), 57699
57733 (1999).
161. Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/%7Elrd/fr991026.html.
162. M. Kock, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 60, 198202 (1983).
163. C. D. Evans, P. M. Cooney, C. R. Scholfield, and H. J. Dutton, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.,
31, 295297 (1954).
164. G. R. List, C. D. Evans, L. T. Black, and T. L. Mounts, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 55, 275
276 (1978).
165. Yearbook and Trading Rules (19931994), National Oilseed Processors Association,
Washington, D.C., p. 86.
166. J. C. Seger and R. L. K. M. van de Sande, in D. R. Erickson, ed., World Conference
Proceedings Edible Fats and Oils Processing: Basic Principles and Modern Practices,
AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1990, pp. 8893.
167. A. J. Dijkstra, in T. A. Applewhite, ed., Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed
Technology and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1992, pp. 138151.
168. C. Pagliero, N. Ochoa, J. Marchese, and M. Mattea, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 78, 793
796 (2001).
169. L. P. Raman, M. Cheryan, and N. Rajagopalan, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 73, 219224 (1996).
170. S. Subramanian, M. Nakajima, A. Yasui, H. Nabetani, T. Kimura, and T. Maekawa,
J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 76, 12471253 (1999).
171. G. R. List, J. W. King, J. H. Johnson, K. Warner, and T. L. Mounts, J. Amer. Oil Chem.
Soc., 70, 473476 (1993).
172. K. J. Moulton and T. L. Mounts, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 67, 3338 (1990).
173. D. R. Erickson, in D. R. Erickson, ed., Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and
Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1995, pp. 184202.
175. R. E. Beal, E. G. Lancaster, and O. L. Brekke, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 33, 619624 (1956).
176. E. Hernandez, Abstracts: 92nd AOCS Annual Meetings and Expo, Minneapolis, 2001,
p. S98.
178. M. Y. Jung, S. H. Yoon, and D. B. Min, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 66, 118120 (1989).
179. D. R. Erickson, in D. R. Erickson, ed., Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and
180. D. R. Erickson and M. D. Erickson, in D. R. Erickson, ed., Practical Handbook of
Soybean Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1995, pp. 218
238.
181. G. R. List, W. E. Neff, R. L. Holliday, J. W. King, and R. Holser, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.,
77, 311314 (2000).
182. Y. Chu and L. Lin, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 69, 880883 (1992).
183. K. J. Moulton, R. E. Beal, and E. L. Griffin, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 50, 450454 (1973).
184. S. Koritala, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 54, 267268 (1977).
185. T. L. Mounts, in D. R. Erickson, E. H. Pryde, O. L. Brekke, T. L. Mounts, and R. A. Falb,
eds., Handbook of Soybean Oil Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign,
Illinois, 1980, pp. 131144.
648
SOYBEAN OIL
186. R. C. Hastert, in Y. H. Hui, ed., Baileys Industrial Oil and Fat Products, vol. 4: Edible
Oil and Fat Products: Processing Technology, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, 1996, pp. 213300.
187. M. Kellens, in W. Hamm and R. J. Hamilton, eds., Edible Oil Processing, Sheffield
Academic Press, Sheffied, U.K., 2000, pp. 129173.
188. T. Okamoto, T. Tsutsumi, S. Tokairin, H. Ehara, T. Maruyama, I. Niiya, and M. Sugano,
Jpn. Inst. Oil & Fat, 48, 877883 (1999).
189. Z. Kemeny, K. Recseg, G. Henon, K. Kovari, and F. Zwobada, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.,
78, 973979 (2001).
190. W. F. De Greyt, M. J. Kellens, and A. D. Huyghebaert, Fett/Lipid, 101, 428432 (1999).
191. W. De Greyt and M. Kellens, in W. Hamm and R. J. Hamilton, eds., Edible Oil
Processing, Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffied, U.K., 2000, pp. 79128.
192. T. W. Kwon, H. E. Snyder, and H. G. Brown, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 61, 18431846
(1984).
193. T. Verleyen, U. Sosinska, S. Ioannidou, R. Verhe, K. Dewettinck, A. Huyghebaert, and
W. De Greyt, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 79, 947953 (2002).
194. R. Krishnamurthy and M. Kellens, in Y. H. Hui, ed., Baileys Industrial Oil and Fat
Products, vol. 3: Edible Oil and Fat Products: Products and Application Technology, 5th
ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996, pp. 193223.
195. A. Wendel, in M. Howe-Grant, ed., Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,
vol. 15, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995, pp. 192210.
196. O. L. Brekke, in D. R. Erickson, E. H. Pryde, O. L. Brekke, T. L. Mounts, and R. A. Falb,
eds., Handbook of Soy Oil Processing and Utilization, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois,
1980, pp. 7188.
197. L. Teberikler, S. Koseoglu, and A. Akgerman, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 78, 115119
(2001).
198. Y. Z. Wu and T. Wang, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 80, 127132 (2003).
199. Y. Wu and T. Wang, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 80, 319326 (2003).
200. G. R. List, in B. F. Szuhai, ed., Lecithins: Source, Manufacture & Uses, AOCS Press,
201. M. D. Pickard, T. J. Jones, and R. T. Tyler, in Y. H. Hui, ed., Baileys Industrial Oil and
Fat Products, vol. 4: Edible Oil and Fat Products: Processing Technology, 5th ed.,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996, pp. 603630.
202. R. L. Winters, in D. R. Erickson, ed., Proceedings: World Conference Edible Fats and
Oils Processing, Basic Principles and Modern Practices, AOCS Press, Champaign,
Illinois, 1990, pp. 402405.
203. J. P. Clark and S. S. Frandsen, in S. S. Koseoglu, K. C. Rhee, and R. F. Wilson, eds., Proc.
World Conf. Oilseed Edible Oils Process, vol. 1, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1998,
pp. 135138.
204. M. R. Law, Western Journal of Medicine, 173, 43 47 (2000).
205. L. Normen, P. Dutta, A. Lia, and H. Andersson, Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 71, 908913 (2000).
206. P. Hollingsworth, Food Tech., 55, 5962 (2001).
207. K. B. Hicks and R. A. Moreau, Food Techol., 55, 6367 (2001).
208. H. Wu, X. Weng, O. Qiu, and L. Li, Shanghai Daxue Xuebao-Ziran Kexueban, 7, 331
333 (2001).
REFERENCES
649
209. Y. Shimada, S. Nakai, M. Suenaga, A. Sugihara, M. Kitano, and Y. Tominaga, J. Amer.

Oil Chem. Soc., 77, 10091013 (2000).
210. C. J. Chang, Y. Chang, H. Lee, J. Lin, and P. Yang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39, 45214525
(2000).
211. C. E. Sumner, Jr., S. D. Barnicki, and M. D. Dolfi (to Eastman Chemical Co.), U.S. Patent
5,424,457, June 12, 1995.
212. P. Golbitz, Soya & Oilseed Blue Book, Soyatech, Inc., Bar Harbor, Maine, 2000.
213. R. S. Daniels, Can. Patent 1,256,449, June 27, 1989.
214. R. Stern, G. Hillion, P. Gateau, and J. C. Guibet, in A. R. Baldwin, ed., Proceeding:
World Conference on Emerging Technologies in the Fats and Oils Industry, AOCS Press,
215. H. N. Basu, and M. E. Norris (to Agricultural Utilization Research Institute), U.S. Patent
5,525,126, June 11, 1996.
216. M. J. Haas and K. M. Scott, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 73, 13931401 (1996).
217. M. J. Haas, S. Bloomer, and K. Scott, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 77, 373379 (2000).
218. M. J. Hass, K. M. Scott, P. J. Michalski, and S. Runyon (to Runyon Industries), U.S.
Patent 2,003,158,074, August 21, 2003.
219. P. Golbitz, 2004 Soya & Oilseed Bluebook, Soyatech, Inc., Bar Harbor, Maine, 2004.
220. D. R. Kodali, INFORM, 14, 121123 (2003).
221. H. Eierdanz, in T. Applewhite, ed., Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed
222. L. Crandall, INFORM, 13, 626631 (2002).
223. Annonymous, Oils and Fats, 17(6), 1819 (2001).
224. F. Sliney, INFORM, 12, 1018 (2001).
225. G. Knothe, INFORM, 13, 900903 (2001).
226. R. Ohlson, in T. Applewhite, ed., Proceedings of the World Conference on Oilseed
227. American Soybean Association, St. Louis, MO. (2003). http://www.soystats.com/2003/
page_24.htm.
228. Yearbook and Trading Rules 20032004, National Oilseed Processors Association,
Washington, D.C., 2003.
229. E. F. Sipos and B. F. Szuhaj, in Y. H. Hui, ed., Baileys Industrial Oil and Fat Products,
vol. 2, 5th ed., John Willey & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996, pp. 497601.
230. E. R. Sherwin, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 53, 430436 (1976).
231. Q. Chen, H. Shi, and C. Ho, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 69, 9991002 (1992).
232. National Archives and Records Administration, Federal Register, 68, (133), (2003).
Available: http://fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/03 17525.htm.
233. W. W. Nawar, in D. B. Min and T. H. Smouse, eds., Flavor Chemistry of Fats and Oils,
234. G. Paquette and D. B. Kupranycz, Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J., 18, 197206 (1985).
235. I. P. Freeman, F. B. Padley, and W. L. Sheppard, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 50, 101103
(1973).
236. M. A. Augustin and S. K. Berry, J. Amer. Oil. Chem. Soc., 60, 15201523 (1983).
650
SOYBEAN OIL
237. M. H. Gordon and L. Kourimska, Food Chem., 52, 175 (1994).

238. P. J. White, C. P. Su, and M. Gupta, in American Oil Chemists Society annual meeting
abstract book, pp. 4546 (2003).
239. K. Warner and S. Knowlton, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 13171322 (1997).
240. C. P. Su and P. J. White, in American Oil Chemists Society annual meeting abstract
book, p. 132 (2003).
241. Code of Federal Regulations, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C.
242. H. J. Basset, Cereal Foods World, 24(1), 79, 24, 25, 29, 30 (1979).
243. A. Moustafa, in D. Erickson, ed., Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and
244. J. A. Segura, M. L. Herra, and M. C. Anon, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 72, 375378 (1995).
245. A. J. Haighton, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 36, 345348 (1959).
246. F. Cho, J. M. deMan, and O. B. Allen, J. Food Lipids, 1, 2552 (1993).
247. E. A. Emken, Ann. Rev. Nutr., 4, 339376 (1984).
248. V. DSouza, L. deMan, and J. M. deMan, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 68, 153162 (1991).
249. R. Wood, in C. K. Chow, ed., Fatty Acids in Foods and Their Health Implications,
Marcell Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 663688.
250. R. P. Mensink and M. B. Katan, N. Engl. J. Med., 323, 439445 (1990).
251. H. B. Hu, M. J. Stampfer, J. E. Manson, E. Rimm, G. A. Colditz, B. A. Rosner, C. H.
Hennekens, and C. W. Willet, N. Engl. J. Med., 337, 14911499 (1997).
252. G. R. List, E. A. Emken, W. F. Kwolek, T. D. Simpson, and H. J. Dutton, J. Amer. Oil
Chem. Soc., 54, 408413 (1997).
253. H. H. Hustedt, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 53, 390392 (1976).
254. M. A. M. Zeitoun, W. E. Neff, G. R. List, and T. L. Mounts, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 70,
467471 (1993).
255. C. Hoy and X. Xu, in F. D. Gunstone, ed., Structured and Modified Lipids, Marcel
Dekker, Inc., New York, 2001, pp. 209239.
256. M. D. Erickson, in D. R. Erickson, ed., Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and
257. G. R. List, T. Pelloso, F. Orthoefer, M. Chrysam, and T. L. Mounts, J. Amer. Oil Chem.
Soc., 72, 383384 (1995).
258. G. R. List, T. L. Mounts, F. Orthoefer, and W. E. Neff, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 73, 729
732 (1996).
259. G. R. List, T. Pelloso, F. Orthoefer, K. Warner, and W. E. Neff, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.,
78, 103104 (2001).
260. L. L. Kok, W. R. Fehr, E. G. Hammond, and P. J. White, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 76,
11751181 (1999).
261. C. E. Stauffer, Fats and Oils, Eagan Press, American Association of Cereal Chemists,
St. Paul, Minnesota, 1996.
262. W. M. Smith, Bakers Dig., 53(8), 810 (1979).
263. H. Birnbaum, Bakers Dig., 52(2), 2836 (1978).
264. A. E. Thomas, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 55, 830833 (1978).
265. F. R. Paulicka, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 53, 421424 (1976).
REFERENCES
651
266. R. D. OBrien, in D. Erickson, ed., Practical Handbook of Soybean Processing and

267. J. H. Hetrick, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 46, 58A, 60A, 62A (1969).
268. S. A. Schlicker and C. Regan, Topics Clin. Nutr., 6, 5060 (1990).
269. T. Nagao and T. Teramoto, Rinsho Eiyo, 99, 414418 (2001).
270. M. G. Soni, H. Kimura, and G. A. Burdock, Food Chem. Toxicol., 39, 317329 (2001).
271. N. Matsuo and I. Tokimitsu, INFORM, 12, 10981102 (2001).
272. T. Yasukawa and K. Yasunaga, J. Oleo Sci., 50, 427432 (2001).
273. C. Watkins, INFORM, 14, 70 (2003).
274. Anonymous, Oils and Fats, 17(1), 1819 (2001).
275. C. Su, Fatty Acid Composition of Oils, Their Oxidative, Flavor, and Heat Stabilities and
the Resultant Quality in Foods, Ph. D. Dissertation, Parks Library, Iowa State University,
Ames, Iowa, (2003).
276. Y. H. Hui, in Y. H. Hui, ed., Baileys Industrial Oil & Fat Products, vol. 2, 5th ed., John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996, pp. 497601.
277. T. H. Smouse, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 56, 747A750A (1979).
278. H. J. Dutton, in K. Warner and N. A. M. Eskin, eds., Methods to Assess Quality and
Stability of Oils and Fat-Containing Foods, American Oil Chemists Society, Champaign, Illinois, 1995, pp. 116.
279. E. N. Frankel, in D. R. Erickson, E. H. Pryde, O. L. Brekke, T. L. Mounts, and R. A. Falb,
1980, pp. 229244.
280. E. H. Farmer, G. F. Bloomfield, A. Sundralingam, and D. A. Sutton, Trans Faraday Soc.,
38, 348356 (1942).
281. M. B. Korycka-Dahl and T. Richardson, CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and
Nutrition, 10, 209241 (1978).
282. P. J. Ke and R. G. Ackman, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 50, 429435 (1973).
283. D. J. Carlsson, T. Suprunchuk, and D. M. Wiles, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 53, 656660
(1976).
284. J. M. deMan, in C. K. Chow, ed., Fatty Acids in Foods and Their Health Implications,
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992, pp. 1746.
285. R. J. Hsieh, in C.-T. Ho and T. G. Hartman, eds., Lipids in Food Flavors, ACS
Symposium Series 558, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp.
3048.
286. E. N. Frankel, Prog. Lipid Res., 19, 122 (1980).
287. P. J. White, in R. D. OBrien, W. E. Farr, and P. J. Wan, eds, Fats and Oils Technology,
2nd ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 2000, pp. 341353.
288. H. W. Gardner, in H. W.-S. Chan, ed., Autoxidation of Unsaturated Lipids, Academic
Press, Inc., London, 1987, pp. 5194.
289. E. N. Frankel, in D. B. Min and T. H. Smouse, eds., Flavor Chemistry of Fats and Oils,
292. M. D. Dixon and E. G. Hammond, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 61, 14521456 (1984).
652
SOYBEAN OIL
293. I. Lee, S. H. Fatemi, E. G. Hammond, and P. J. White, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 72, 539
546 (1995).
294. J.-L. Kao, E. G. Hammond, and P. J. White, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 1103 (1998).
295. L. Liu, and E. G. Hammond, J. Food Quality, 23, 521 (2000).
296. K. Liu, Inform, 10, 868878 (1999).
297. M. H. Gordon, in B. J. F. Hudson, ed., Food Antioxidants, Elsevier Applied Science,
New York, 1990, pp. 1318.
298. J. Loliger, in D. B. Min and T. H. Smouse, eds., Flavor Chemistry of Lipid Foods, AOCS
Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1985, pp. 303325.
299. S. J. Bishov, A. S. Henick, J. W. Giffee, I. T. Nil, P. A. Prell, and M. Wolf, J. Food Sci., 36,
532535 (1971).
300. D. Firestone, ed., Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil
Chemists Society, 4th ed., AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1993.
301. D. L. Hamm, E. G. Hammond, V. Parvanah, and H. E. Snyder, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.,
42, 920922 (1965).
302. C. Paqout, ed., Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivatives, 7th ed.,
Pergamon Press, New York, 1987.
303. G. Yildiz, R. L. Wehling, and S. L. Cuppett, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 80, 103107
(2003).
304. P. J. White, in K. Warner and N. A. M. Eskin, eds., Methods to Assess Quality and
Stability of Oils and Fat-Containing Foods, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1995,
pp. 159178.
305. I. H. Rukunudin, P. J. White, C. J. Bern, and T. B. Bailey, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 75,
563568 (1998).
306. G. Billek, G. Guhr, and J. Waibel, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 55, 728732 (1978).
307. J. I. Gray, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 55, 539546 (1978).
308. J. Pawliszyn, in J. Pawliszyn, ed., Solid Phase Microextraction: Theory and Practice,
Wiley-VCH, Inc., New York, 1997, pp. 97140.
309. H. H. Jelen, M. Obuchowska, R. Zawirska-Wojtasiak, and E. Wasowicz, J. Agric. Food
Chem., 48, 23602367 (2000).
310. D. D. Roberts, P. Pollien, and C. Milo, J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 24302437
(2000).
311. C. D. Evans, G. R. List, R. L. Hoffman, and H. A. Moser, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 46,
501504 (1969).
312. R. G. Scholz and L. R. Ptak, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 43, 596599 (1966).
313. H. P. Dupuy, S. P., Fore, and L. A. Goldblatt, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 50, 340342
(1973).
314. H. P. Dupuy, E. T., Rayner, and J. I. Wadsworth, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 53, 628631
(1976).
315. K. Warner and T. J. Nelsen, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 73, 157166 (1996).
316. G. Paquette and D. B. Kupranycz, Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J., 18, 197206 (1985).
317. G. R. List, in D. R. Erickson, E. H. Pryde, O. L. Brekke, T. L. Mounts, and R. A. Falb,
1980, pp. 267354.
REFERENCES
653
318. Iowa State University Extension. (2003). Available: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/

Publications/4H956.pdf.
319. K. G. Stern, and Grossman H. S., (to H. Sobotka), U.S. Pat. 2,842,577 (1958).
320. J. M. DeMan, in C. K. Chow, ed., Fatty Acids in Foods and Their Health Implications,
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992, pp. 1746.
321. A. Bonanome and S. M. Grundy, N. Engl. J. Med., 318, 12441248 (1988).
322. S. M. Grundy and M. A. Denke, J. Lipid Res., 31, 11491172 (1990).
323. S. H. Fatemi and E. G. Hammond, Lipids, 15, 379385 (1980).
324. S. M. Grundy, L. Florentin, D. Nix, and M. F. Whelan, Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 47, 965969
(1988).
325. R. T. Holman, S. B. Johnson, and P. L. Ogburn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 4835
4839 (1991).
326. W. E. M. Lands, in Fish and Human Health, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, Florida,
1986.
327. P. M. Kris-Etherton, W. S. Harris, and L. J. Appel, Circulation, 106, 27472757
(2002).
328. J. M. King and P. J. White, in L. Jackson, ed., Impact of Processing on Food Safety,
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999, pp. 5165.
329. K. Almendingen, O. Jordal, P. Kierulf, B. Sandstad, and J. I. Pedersen, J. Lipid Res., 36,
13701384 (1995).
330. R. L. Wolff, J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 69, 106110 (1992).
332. J.-L. Sebedio, A. Grandgiard, C. Septier, and J. Prevost, Rev. Francas Corps Gras, 34,
1518 (1987).
334. K. Almendingen, O. Jordal, P. Kierulf, B. Sandstad, and J. I. Pedersen, J. Lipid Res., 36,
13701384 (1995).
335. A. Grandgirard and F. Juilliard, Rev. Francais Corps Gras, 34, 213219 (1987).
336. A. Grandgirard, A. Piconneaux, J. L. Sebedio, S. F. OKeefe, E. Semon, and J. L.
Lequere, Lipids, 24, 799804 (1989).
337. J. M. Chardigny, J. L. Sebedio, and A. Granddirard, in A. Sinclair and R. Gibson, eds.,
Essential Fatty Acids and Eicosanoids, AOCS Press, Champaign, Illinois, 1992,
pp. 148152.
338. L. Bretillon, J. M. Chardigny, J. P. Noe l, and J. L. Se be dio, J. Lipid Res., 39, 22282236
(1998).
339. J. R. Judd, B. A. Clevidence, R. A. Muesing, J. Wittes, M. E. Sunkin, and J. J. Podczasy,
Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 59, 861868 (1994).
340. L. Kohlmeier and M. Mendez, Proc. Nutri. Soc., 56, 369383 (1997).
341. M. G. Enig, S. Atal, M. Keeney, and J. Sampugna, J. Amer. College Nutr., 9, 471486
(1990).
342. D. M. Klurfeld and Kritchevsky, INFORM, 3, 515516 (1992).
343. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 3rd ed., Home and
Garden Bulletin No. 232, Washington D.C., 1990.

Soybean Oil

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soybean Oil

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Soybean Oil

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

13

of linolenic acid. Recent decades have witnessed numerous attempts to manipulate

TABLE 1. Typical Composition (wt% ! std. dev.)

TABLE 2. Soybean Protein and Oil Responses to Various

? inconclusive; increase; $ decrease.

TABLE 3. Typical Composition of Crude Soybean Oil.

1.852.75% (19). Of the unsaponifiable matter of soybean oil, typically about

Typical Value %a (27)

Based on 21 commercial samples.

3. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOYBEAN OIL

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOYBEAN OIL

TABLE 7. Some Physical Properties of Typical Soybean Oil.

0.9165 to 0.9261 g/mL (31, 32) Decreases 0.000643 to

TABLE 8. The Onset, Maximum Rate, and Termination of Melting Temperatures of

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOYBEAN OIL

RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS

5. RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS

RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS

Figure 5. Photograph of a modern soybean-extraction plant (courtesy of Bunge North America,

RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS

Figure 6. Photograph inside a modern direct solvent-extraction plant processing soybeans

Soybeans are exclusively extracted in the percolation mode as opposed to the

RECOVERY OF OIL FROM SOYBEANS

Figure 8. Photograph inside a modern extruding-expelling plant processing soybeans. (This

6. QUALITIES OF SOYBEAN OILS AND MEALS EXTRACTED

QUALITIES OF SOYBEAN OILS AND MEALS EXTRACTED

Reported at 12% moisture basis.

TABLE 11. Quality Characteristics of Soybean Oils Recovered by Different Processes.

solubilities in potassium hydroxide solution, a measure of protein denaturation and

SOY PROTEIN INGREDIENTS

7. SOY PROTEIN INGREDIENTS

cohesion-adhesion, elasticity, emulsification, fat absorption and binding, foaming,

8. BASIC PROCESSING OPERATIONS

BASIC PROCESSING OPERATIONS

Crude Soybean Oil

Salad & Cooking Oils

Figure 9. Diagram of conventional soybean oil refining.

of water, or in a nonhydratable form, which cannot be easily hydrated and removed.

BASIC PROCESSING OPERATIONS

TABLE 12. Effect of processing on content of tocopherols, sterols, and squalene

BASIC PROCESSING OPERATIONS

value is another indicator for effective deodorization. Heat bleaching is achieved by

Peroxide Value Tocopherol Free Fatty

ALTERNATIVE REFINING METHODS

9. ALTERNATIVE REFINING METHODS

10. COPRODUCTS AND UTILIZATION

COPRODUCTS AND UTILIZATION

TABLE 15. Typical Composition (%) of Commercially Refined Soy Lecithin

tidylinositol. The phosphatidylcholine-enriched fraction is an excellent oil-in-water

11. FOOD AND BIOBASED PRODUCT USES OF SOYBEAN OIL

FOOD AND BIOBASED PRODUCT USES OF SOYBEAN

Moisture and volatile

(up to 0.15 with

(up to 0.15 with

(up to 1.25 with

(up to 0.15 with

Refined bleached color

3.5 Red max.

transportation and storage, which cause numerous handling problems. Once-refined

FOOD AND BIOBASED PRODUCT USES OF SOYBEAN