Gan Power Amplifier Design
Gan Power Amplifier Design
Gan Power Amplifier Design
High Power
High Efficiency
High Reliability
Good Frequency Range
Non Complex Matching
with wide bandwidth
Linear for Varying
Amplitude Modulation
Low Cost
IV Trajectory
VDC
V DC
Idc
Imin
VDC
Vmin
Voltage (V)
I
Vmax
Transistor Current
Gate to Source
DC Bias Voltage
GaN HEMT
Tcase = 250C
Rth = 3.80C/W
Gate
Biasing
Drain
Biasing
Output Port
Load Resistance
RF Source DC
Blocking
Cap
DC
Blocking
Cap
Drain
to Source
Voltage
and
Current
Monitors
Temperature Increase
Monitor Probe
Band Gap
Energy
(eV)
eV)
Critical
Breakdown
Field
(MV/cm)
Thermal
ConducConductance
(W/cm(W/cm-0K)
Mobility
(cm2/V/V-s)
Saturated
Velocity
(107 cm/s)
Relative
Dielectric
Constant
Si
1.1
0.3
1.5
1300
11.9
GaAs
1.4
0.4
0.5
6000
1.3
12.9
4H SiC
3.2
3.3
3.7
610
9.7
6H SiC
3.0
3.0
4.9
310
2.0
9.7
GaN
3.4
3.0
1.5
1500
2.7
9.0
High
High Power
High Power
Temperature (High Vmax)
(High Imax)
Operation
High Power GaN on 4H SiC
(Low Thermal Heating)
GaN mobility enhanced with HEMT structure for higher gain and frequency operation
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
1000
BJT (Pulsed)
MOSFET
Power (W)
100
BJT
LDMOS
FET
10
GaN HEMT
HBT
HEMT
PHEMT
0.1
0.01
0.1
10
100
Frequency (GHz)
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
High Efficiency ()
= k (Vmax
(Vmax Vmin)/(Vmax + Vmin)
Vmin)
k = 50% Class a, 78.5% Class b and higher for
class c, d, e, f, and f-1
We will discuss later in the lecture all the details of
the various classes of operation
With high voltage operation (high Vmax),
Vmax), and
reasonable low Vmin (knee voltage) the ratio of
(Vmax Vmin)/(Vmax + Vmin)
Vmin) will close to unity as
opposed to low voltage operation where the ration
takes a big hit on efficiency
High Power
High breakdown voltage
High peak current, (Saturated velocity)
High current capability
Good efficiency
Low knee voltage (Vmin
(Vmin))
High Vmax --- High breakdown voltage
Can cutoff current at high voltage low Imin
Low semiconductor and circuit losses
High Reliability
High temperature operation (High band gap material)
High reliability process
Low thermal resistance
1.9 GHz
28V DC operation
GaN HEMT Device on 100 m of 4H SiC
0.25 Gate Length
1.8 mm Wide
Nonlinear Model Developed by Dr. Walter Curtice
Load the file cfet9.dll into AWR model directory
Open up the file hb_cfet_1p8mmClassA.emp for
class A operation and hb_cfet_1p8mmClassB.emp
for class B operation
10
P = 38.9 dBm
= PAE = 45%
Note low Gain and Phase variation versus Pin ideal for low ACPR and
EVM for digitally amplitude variant modulated signals
11
Thermal Considerations
Pdc in
Prf in
Prf out
Tj = Ths + P dissipated *
Tj = Junction temperature
Ths = heat sink temperature
= Thermal resistance
Pdiss = Pdc in + Prf in Prf out
Class a has high temperature when not obtaining output power
because dc power and inputs power are the heat inputs.
With higher input powers, significant power is extracted,
reducing the dissipated power and junction temperature rise
12
13
Crey device
B
AB
Conduction Angle (Degrees)
ECN FT11.MCD
14
PNORM (R)
GNORM (R)
1
0.9
0.8
NORM (T)
0.7
NORM (R)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
NORM
/F
45
90
135
180
225
270
315
360
1.2
P/Pnorm
1.1
1
2700
0.9
2250
1800
0.8
0.7
2250
0.6
3600
2700
0.5
0.4
0.3
1800
2250
2700
3600
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
15
IV Trajectory
Imin
VDC
VDC
Class B, A0 1 / , A1 0.5
R
-180
Vmax
-90
0
-90
t (Degrees)
180
t (Degrees)
Vmin
VDC
16
17
AM to PM of Power Amplifiers
Thermal Considerations
Pdc in
Prf out
Prf in
18
High Power
High breakdown voltage
High peak current, (Saturated velocity)
High current capability
Good efficiency
Low knee voltage (Vmin
(Vmin))
High Vmax --- High breakdown voltage
Can cutoff current at high voltage low Imin
Low semiconductor and circuit losses
High Reliability
High temperature operation
High reliability process
Low thermal resistance
Thermal management critical because of the very high power
density in a small area and heat must be removed with low
thermal resistance
19
IV Trajectory
Imax
Bias Point
D, E, F, F-1
C
Imin
Vmin
A
AB
VQ
C
Vmax
-90
-180
AB
t (Degrees)
Class D
Vcc
Idc
Iout(t)
RFC
/4
Vce(t)
f0
V0ut(t)
fop01.vsd
Class F-1
Class E
20
Class D1 (Push-Pull)
Vcc
Ice1
Cser
Q1
Lser
Vce1
RG
RL
Vce2
Q2
ClassD1.VSD
Ice2
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
Operating
Class
Conduction
Angle
Gain Reduction
To Class A
DegDegrees
360
dB
Ideal Efficiency
Efficiency
Reduction
50
Poor
fo
Harmonic
Suppression
nfo
Peak Transistor
Voltage
Vmax
Vcc
Volts
Vo
Volts
F
Inverse
65
78
85
100
100
100
100
100
12Vo/Vcc
See
Notes
1Vo/Vcc
1Vo/Vcc
1Vo/Vcc
Good
Very
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
180
Short
All nf0
2Vcc2Vcc-Vo
Volts
Knee Voltage
D1
Short 2f0
Supply Voltage
<180
<100
Good
180
GHz
Pout/Pin Gain
Linearity
180
to
360
1-Vo/Vcc
Efficiency at
Reduced Power
Frequency
AB
Series LC circuit
resonant at fo
VccVcc-Vo
Poor
3.5Vcc3.5Vcc2.5Vo
<20
Short even n
Open odd n
2Vcc2Vcc-Vo
Open
even n
Short
odd n
V0+(Vcc
-Vo)
21
Conclusions
22
Cree
23
24
Thermal Improvements
25
26
27
High Efficiency Ka/Q Band PHEMT Power Amplifier MMICs Dr. James J. Komiak, BAE Systems,
IMS2011
Workshop
2014
Niehenke Consulting Inc.
GaN Power Amplifier Design -56
28
GaN T-Gate and Field Plate Technology for Applications Below 45 GHz Harris
Moyer, HRL Laboratories, IMS2011 Workshop, Introduction to GaN MMIC
Design
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
GaN T-Gate and Field Plate Technology for Applications Below 45 GHz Harris
Moyer, HRL, IMS2011 Workshop, Introduction to GaN MMIC Design
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
29
GaN T-Gate and Field Plate Technology for Applications Below 45 GHz Harris
Moyer, HRL, IMS2011 Workshop, Introduction to GaN MMIC Design
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
MMIC: B. Kim et al., A Linear, High-Efficiency GaN Power Amplifier Operating at 74 GHz, GOMAC
2011, March 2011
Presentation: IMS2011 Workshop WMA, Q/V-Band Linear Power Amplifiers using Envelope Tracking
and Digital Pre-distortion James Schellenberg, QuinStar Technology, Inc., Contributors: Bumjin Kim,
Jonmei Yan*, Donald Kimball* *University of California, San Diego, CA, USA 92093
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
30
This Work
Dual-Gate GaN MMICs for MM-Wave Operation
Ruediger Quay, Senior Member, IEEE, A. Tessmann, R.
Kiefer, S. Maroldt, C. Haupt, U. Nowotny, R. Weber, H.
Massler, D. Schwantuschke, M. Seelmann-Eggebert, A.
Leuther, M. Mikulla, and O. Ambacher
IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS COMPONENTS
LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2011, pp. 95-97
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
31
IN0.17Al0.83N on GaN
32
Stability
Stability
33
Stabilization
Add Series Resistance
Unstable
Region
Unstable
Region
Unstable
Region
Stabilization
Unstable
Region
Unstable
Region
Add Series or
Shunt Resistance
Unstable
Region
Unstable
Region
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
34
35
Unconditionally Stable
Load Line
Vgs = -1.17 V, RL = 15 . Pin = 34.2 dBm
36
37
Output Match
2.13 pF
38
Input Match
0.13 +j0.02 to 1
50 28.6
28.60
50
80
6 pF
0.13 +j0.02
2 pF
50
39
Example
Rgate = 0 Ohms
40
Example
Rgate = 50 Ohms
Example
41
Example
Rgate = 1K
Conclusion
42
Input Matched
Note Zin changes with input power a cause of AM/PM
43
44
Better PAE
Similar power
Lower temperature for low input powers
Better PAE at lower power compared to Class a
However Class B has a gain and phase variation
versus input power so design will sacrifice on Pout
with digitally modulated signals with varying input
amplitude envelop as experienced with modern
digitally modulated signals like WCDMA, LTE, and
WIMAX
45
Model
HBTUNER
ID=TU1
Mag1=Mag1
Ang1=Ang1 Deg
Mag2=Mag2
Ang2=Ang2 Deg
Mag3=Mag3
Ang3=Ang3 Deg
Fo=1.9 GHz
PORT
Zo=50 Ohm
P=1
Z=50 Ohm
Second
Harmonic
Short
RES
ID=R2
R=50 Ohm
46
= 1@141.80
47
Matching at Fundamental
50 9.550 line
Transistor
50
= 0.612@157.40
23 900 line
48
49
50
Class A
Class B
Pout = 20 W @P1dB
PAE = 51%,
14 dB SS Gain
Pout = 20 W @P1dB
@P1dB
PAE = 72%,
72%,
11.9 dB SS Gain
51
L. Dunleavy, C. Baylis, II, W. Curtice, and R. Connick, Modeling GaN: Powerful but
Challenging, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp82- 96, October 2010.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
52
Comparison of pulsed IV (solid lines without symbols) and static IV for a GaN
HEMT. Pulse conditions were 0.2 ms pulse width and 1-ms separation with
quiescent bias set at Vdsq 5 0, Vgsq 5 0. Vgs is varied from 25 to 21 V in 1 V steps.
L. Dunleavy, C. Baylis, II, W. Curtice, and R. Connick, Modeling GaN: Powerful but
Challenging, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp82- 96, October 2010.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
53
L. Dunleavy, C. Baylis, II, W. Curtice, and R. Connick, Modeling GaN: Powerful but
Challenging, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp82- 96, October 2010.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
54
IMS2011 WMJ Workshop: Modeling Considerations for GaN HEMT and Higher Level IC
Devices, Dr. Larry Dunleavy, Dr. Jiang Liu, Modelithics, Inc.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
L. Dunleavy, C. Baylis, II, W. Curtice, and R. Connick, Modeling GaN: Powerful but
Challenging, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp82- 96, October 2010.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
55
Yes
Yes
HEMT
L. Dunleavy, C. Baylis, II, W. Curtice, and R. Connick, Modeling GaN: Powerful but
Challenging, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp82- 96, October 2010.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
Yes
Yes
HEMT
Electrothermal Models
[4] Y. Tajima, Introduction of new large signal model (LS7) for MESFET family of devices, presented
at Workshop 38th European Microwave Conf.: WFR-15: Advances in Model-based HPA Design,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Oct. 2008.
[5] W. R. Curtice, Users Guide for the C_FET Model for Agilents Advanced Design Simulator.
Washington Crossing, PA: W. R. Curtice Consulting, June 2004.
[11] I. Angelov, K. Andersson, D. Schreurs, D. Xiao, N. Rorsman1, V. Desmaris, M. Sudow, and H.
Zirath, Large-signal modelling and comparison of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs and SiC MESFETs,
in Proc. Asia-Pacific Microwave Conf. 2006, Dec. 2006, pp. 279282.
L. Dunleavy, C. Baylis, II, W. Curtice, and R. Connick, Modeling GaN: Powerful but
Challenging, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp82- 96, October 2010.
2014 Niehenke Consulting Inc.
56
57
BAE 0.2mm Non field Plate HEMT, ft = 50 GHz, fmax = 220 GHz, 5W/mm, 46% PAE at 30 GHz
116
58
Transistor:
Eudyna 10W GaN HEMT amplifier, EGN010MK
Vds = 50V
Ids = 100 ma (no RF power) deep class b
Frequency range: 3.4 to 3.8 GHz
Design objectives: (at P1.5 dB)
Power > 41 dBm
PAE > 70%
> 80%
G > 8.5 dB
Stable 0.1 to 10 GHz
Input return loss > 15 dB
PA Design Steps
Step 1:
Examine IV Curves and note knee voltage (one point on
load line) and no current point at Vgs = 95 V
Note input dc voltage for no gate current
Determine Vgs for 100 ma of current
AWR circuit GaN HEMT WIMAX PA Step1
Step 2:
Examine Load Pull data and determine optimum load for
max power at Pin = 30 dBm
Determine circuit using transmission line. Hint try a
length of line of length theta and impedance Zmatch
Examine Pout vs Pin and Pout vs freq at Pin = 30 dBm
Optimize circuit for operation over full frequency
AWR circuit GaN HEMT WIMAX PA Step2
59
PA Design Steps
Step 3:
Match input at Pin = 30 dBm over frequency. Need to use a 10
degree 50 length of line on input in order to solder input
transistor lead
Suggestion: try a shunt cap and series which will also serve
as an input blocking cap
Examine circuit stability (k, MU2, input stability plane
AWR circuit GaN HEMT WIMAX PA Step3
Step 4:
Now examine stability (k factor and MU2 as well as input
stability plane) and completely stabilize circuit with minimal
degradation of gain and rematch input circuit. This is the
hardest step
AWR circuit GaN HEMT WIMAX PA Step5
Suggestion: See schematic next page
Try to keep Rsh equal to or greater than 200 so that gain is
not severely reduced
AWR circuit GaN HEMT WIMAX PA Step4
60
Results: Step 1
Results: Step 1
61
Results: Step 2
Results: Step 2
62
Results: Step 2
Results: Step 2
63
Unmatched
Matched
64
65
66
67
Final Schematic
Final Schematic
68
69
PORT_PS1
P=1
Z=50 Ohm
PStart=6 dBm
PStop=38 dBm
PStep=1 dB
1
SUBCKT
ID=S2
NET="Main PA"
QHYB
ID=U1
R=50 Ohm
COUPL=3 dB
LOSS=0 dB
0
2
-90
0
-90
RES
ID=R1
R=50 Ohm
QHYB
ID=U2
R=50 Ohm
COUPL=3 dB
LOSS=0 dB
SUBCKT
ID=S1
NET="Main PA"
4
1
RES
ID=R2
R=50 Ohm
3
-90
0
-90
PORT
P=2
Z=50 Ohm
70
TLIN
ID=TL5
Z0=50 Ohm
EL=43 Deg
F0=3.5 GHz
71
6 dB
6 dB
72
Conclusions
73