Oral Screren
Oral Screren
Oral Screren
026
Case Report
European Journal
of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
EUROPEAN JOURNAL
OF PHARMACEUTICAL
ISSN 3294-3211
AND MEDICAL RESEARCH
EJPMR
www.ejpmr.com
*Correspondence for
ABSTRACT
Author
www.ejpmr.com
1385
Kar.
www.ejpmr.com
1386
Kar.
2mm wax according to the need of treatment. Posterior segment is not influenced by the
appliance directly. Then 2 loops were fabricated with 19 gauge stainless steel wire and the
distal side of the loop were joined together with same wire soldered with each other taking
the help of sliver solder, flux and blue flame .The loops were designed in such way that the
outer loop were extended up to distal end of first permanent molars or the last erupted molars.
A clearance of 2 4 mm was incorporated between loops and also buccal surfaces of the
dental arches. These distally joined loops actually help to restrict the buccinator muscles in
exerting inward muscle forces towards developing dental arches. A loop was also
incorporated in the anterior portion of the appliance according to Holz modification. The
distal loops were joined with each other with the help of soldering to prevent distortion and
cheek injury by the free distal loops and acting as a firm barrier. This was the modification
done in this appliance. Then acrylisation was performed with clear acrylic only in the anterior
portion to incorporate the wire components in the appliance. Allowances were given for
labial frenum. Appliance may be processed with either heat cure or self-cure acrylic.
Breathing holes were incorporated into the acrylic potion. Then properly trimmed and
polished appliance was delivered to the patient.
www.ejpmr.com
1387
Kar.
www.ejpmr.com
1388
Kar.
www.ejpmr.com
1389
Kar.
www.ejpmr.com
1390
Kar.
www.ejpmr.com
1391
Kar.
2. Screen with breathing holes - multiple small holes are created in the anterior acrylic
aspect of the oral screen to facilitate some amount of mouth breathing. Holes may be
gradually reduced in size when nasal breathing is improved.
3. Double oral screen- A separate screen is fabricated lingual to oral screen with 0.9 mm
wire bilaterally that passing through the bite in lateral incisor area or distal to the last
molar area . It is helpful in the prevention of tongue thrusting.
4. Oral screen used in open bite cases-in this appliance an acrylic projection is fabricated to
keep the tongue away from the dentition.
5. Rehaks modification- In this modification a pacifier is attached with the screen which
projects out from the outer part of the oral screen. The pacifier has to be retained by the
lips, therefore improve the hypotonic lips.
6. Modification of Goyal S : Incorporation of wire component by reducing acrylic part.
7. Present modification: With indigenous design of reducing the acrylic bulk with ovoid and
criss cross wire.
Advantages
1. Light weight
2. Easy construction
3. Easily adjustable buccal loops
4. criss cross wires causing minimum or no distortion of extended loops.
5. Needs less chair side time for adjustment.
6. Less soft tissue ulceration in vestibules
7. Easy to clean.
8. More comfortable.
9. Low maintenance
Disadvantages
Complete mechanotherapy is not possible with this appliance
It is only an initial assault or phase 1 correction of orthodontic problem.
Regular checkup is needed.
Co-operation of patient is most essential
Oral screen is also contraindicated for habitual mouth breathers due to specified nasal
obstruction. ENT surgeon consultation is needed before treatment plan.
www.ejpmr.com
1392
Kar.
CONCLUSION
Oral screen helps to establish a better muscle balance between the tongue and buccinators
mechanism. So the appliance is best suited to work with abnormal lip and tongue activity It is
more comfortable than conventional oral screen due to less acrylic part with more safety
future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Special thanks to my students Gufran Ahamed & Soumyadeep Mondal for their continuous
effort
REFERENCES
1. Schwarz, A.M., Gratzinger, M. Removable orthodontic appliances. W. B. Saunders
Company, Philadelphia., 1966.
2. Kraus F. Vestibular and oral screens. Trans Eur Orthod Soc., 1956; 32: 217224.
3. Hotz, R. Orthodontia in Everyday Practice. Hans Huber, Bern., 1980.
4. Nord, C.F.L. Loose appliances in orthodontia. Trans. Eur. Soc. Orthod., 1959; 246.
5. Nord, C.F.L. Een revolutie in die orthodontische apparatur. Ned. Tijdschr. Tandheelk.
1965; 72: 832.
6. Fingeroth, A.L., Fingeroth, M.M. Early treatment: Theory and therapy. Orthod. Record.,
1958; 1: 8799.
7. Rokytova, K., Trefna, B. Use of a vestibular screen for rehabilitation of nasal breathing in
children, Cesk. Otolaryngol., 1960; 9: 293.
8. Rogers AP. Exercises for the Development of the Muscles of the Face, with a View to
Increasing their Functional Activity. Dent. Cosmos., 1918; 60: 857897.
9. Graber, T.M., Neumann, B. Removable orthodontic appliances. W. B. Saunders
Company, Philadelphia., 1977.
10. Selmer-Olsen, R.: Personal communication, May 23; 1975.
www.ejpmr.com
1393