Appraisal Form For Staff SR - Staff
Appraisal Form For Staff SR - Staff
Appraisal Form For Staff SR - Staff
Designation:
Date of Joining :
Evaluation Period:
Last Promoted on:
List below the essential functions of the position, and/or projects for which the employee is
evaluated:
Rating Standards
Rating Standards Unacceptable (U) Work performance is inadequate and inferior to the
standards of performance required for the position. Performance at this level cannot be
allowed to continue.
Improvement Needed (IN) Work performance does not consistently meet the standards of
performance for the position. Serious effort is needed to improve performance.
Meets Expectations (ME) Work performance consistently meets the standards of
performance for the position.
Exceeds Expectations (EE) Work performance is consistently above the standard of
performance for the position.
Outstanding (OS) Work performance is consistently superior to standards required for the
job.
Not Applicable (NA) The employee is not required to perform in a specific rating factor,
and it cannot be measured
1
Performance Evaluation Form
Human Resource Dept. TEMPL
IN
ME
EE
O
S
RATING FACTORS
COMMENTS
Job Knowledge
Analyses Problems
Provides Suggestions for
Work Improvement
Employs tools of the Job
Competently
Follows proper safety
procedures
Quality of work (Manner in which the employee completes job assignments
Accuracy or Precision
Thoroughness/Neatness
Reliability
Responsiveness to Requests
For Service
Follows Thorough/Follow-Up
Judgment/ Decision Making
Interpersonal Skills(Effectiveness of the employees interactions with others and
as a team participant)
With Co-workers
With Supervisors
With Colleagues,
Subordinates, Superiors
and/or Community
Team Participation
Team Contributions
Commitment to Team
Success
Communication Skills (If applicable to the job)
Written Expression
Oral Expression
Shares Information Willingly
Tact & Diplomacy
Approach to Work (Characteristics the employee demonstrates while performing
job assignments)
Actively Seeks Ways to
Streamline Processes and
2
Performance Evaluation Form
Human Resource Dept. TEMPL
NA
IN
ME
EE
O
S
RATING FACTORS
COMMENTS
Systems
Open to New Ideas and
Approaches
Initiative
Planning & Organization
Flexible/Adaptable
Follows Instructions
Challenges Status Quo
Processes in Appropriate
Ways
Seeks Additional Training and
Development
Attendance & Punctuality
Quantity of Work (Employees success in producing the required amount of work)
Priority Setting
Amount of Work Completed
Work Completed on Schedule
Overall Performance Rating
Meets
Improvemen Expectations
t Needed
Work
Work
Work
Performance is
Performance
performance
inadequate and
does not
consistently
inferior to the
consistently
meets the
standards of
meet the
standards of
performance
standards of
performance
required for the
performance
for the
position.Perform
for the
position.
ance at this level position.
cannot be
Serious effort
allowed to
is needed to
continue.
improve
performance.
Place an X in the box above that describes the
performance rating.
Unacceptable
Exceeds
Expectations
Work
performance
is consistently
above the
standard of
performance
for the
position.
Outstanding
Work
performance
is consistently
superior to the
standards
required for
the job.
employees overall
3
Performance Evaluation Form
Human Resource Dept. TEMPL
Reviewer
Signature
Date
Signature
Date
4
Performance Evaluation Form
Human Resource Dept. TEMPL