Behavioural Learning Theories (Topic 2)
Behavioural Learning Theories (Topic 2)
Behavioural Learning Theories (Topic 2)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................
TOPIC 2
Learning
TOPIC
Behavioural
Learning
Theories
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After completing this chapter you should be able to:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
10
2.1
TOPIC 2
C L A S S I C A L C O N D I T I O N I N G B Y
I VA N PAV L O V
Ivan Pavlov
1849-1936
11
This action (food and bell ringing) was done at several meals. Every time
the dog sees the food, the dog also hears the bell. Unconditioned means
unlearned, untaught, pre-existing, already-present-before-we-got-there.
Conditioning just means the opposite. Pavlov was trying to associate,
connect, bond or link something new with the old relationship. He wanted
this new thing (the bell) to elicit the same response.
Step 3: After Conditioning
This time Pavlov rang only the bell at mealtime, but he did not show any
food. Guess what the dog did. Right.
12
TOPIC 2
The bell elicited the same response as the sight of the food gets. Over
repeated trials, the dog has LEARNED to associate the bell with the food.
The bell has the power to produce the same response as the food. In other
words, the dog has been conditioned to salivate when hearing the bell.
2.1.1
Conclusion
This is the essence of Classical Conditioning. You start with two things
that are already connected with each other (food and salivation). Then you
pair a third thing (bell) with the conditioned stimulus (food) over several
trials. Eventually, this third thing may become so strongly associated, that
it has acquired the power to produce the old behaviour. The organism is
conditioned to respond to the third thing or stimulus.
Pavlov extended his experiment by using bells of different tones. Surprisingly,
the dog still salivated when it heard the different tones. The dog responded
even though the tones of the bells were different or nearly the same. In other
words the dog is capable of generalisation, and able to generalise across
different tones. For example, when driving and you hear the sound of a
siren behind you and you immediately move to the side to give way. You
do not discriminate whether it is the sound of the fire-truck, the ambulance
or the police (which may be different) but you react in the same way. In
other words, you have generalised that any sound of the siren, you will
respond similarly.
Pavlov also found that when the tone of the bell that was closer to the
sound of the original bell, the dog salivated. When the tone of the bell was
very different from the sound of the original bell, the dog salivated less
frequently. In other words the dog is capable of discrimination, and able to
differentiate among the different tones. The dog is responds to one stimulus
and not to another stimulus. However, when Pavlov continued ringing the
bell and after many trials it was not followed by food, the dog gradually
did not salivate. In other words, extinction took place and the dog did not
salivate after sometime when it realised that food was not forthcoming.
13
2.2
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN
D A I LY L I F E
The smell of fresh bread baking makes my mouth water. This is probably
the result of Classical conditioning. In the past the smell of the fresh bread
immediately preceded putting a piece in my mouth, which causes salivation.
Through the mechanism of Classical conditioning the smell itself comes
to elicit salivation.
After the bad car accident Jeffri had last year, he would cringe and break
into a sweat at the sound of squealing brakes. This is Classical conditioning.
The cringing, which is an unconditioned response to pain or fear, was
produced by the accident and its accompanying pain. That accident
was probably preceded by the sound of squealing brakes, which became
a conditioned stimulus for the conditioned response of cringing.
To treat alcoholics, we sometimes put a chemical in their drinks that
makes them sick. Eventually, the taste of alcohol becomes aversive. This is
Classical conditioning. The chemical that makes the drinker sick is being
paired with the taste of alcohol so that the alcohol itself becomes the
conditioned stimulus for being sick.
Classical conditioning works with advertising. For example, many product
ads prominently feature attractive young women. The young women
(Unconditioned Stimulus) naturally elicit a favorable, mildly aroused
feeling (Unconditioned Response) in most men.
ACTIVITY
14
TOPIC 2
2.3
FAT H E R O F B E H AV I O U R I S M
15
Watson set the stage for behaviorism, which soon rose to dominate psychology.
While behaviorism began to lose its hold after 1950, many of the concepts
and principles are still widely used today. Conditioning and behavior
modification are still widely used in therapy and behavioral training to
help clients change problematic behaviors and develop new skills.
2.4
WAT S O N S E X P E R I M E N T S W I T H
LITTLE ALBERT
Albert had LEARNED to fear the white rat because of its association with
the loud noise.
16
TOPIC 2
It was also shown that Alberts fear generalised to a variety of other objects
such as a rabbit, fur coat, and even a Santa Claus mask. In other words,
any object that was furry brought fear to the infant. The experiment by
Watson showed that our emotional reactions can be rearranged through
classical conditioning. Watson demonstrated that an emotion such as fear
could be transferred to an organism that originally that not have such a
fear. The finding is significant because it implies that if fears are learned,
it should be possible to unlearn or extinguish them.
Unfortunately, Watson and Rayner never removed Alberts fears because
his mother removed him from the hospital where the experiment was being
conducted shortly after fear was instilled.
17
2.5
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN
THE CLASSROOM
It is the first day in school and suddenly Suzy hears her teacher Ms. Lim
yell Keep Quiet at the top of her voice. Suzy was startled and terrified
and started to cry. In the next few days, whenever Ms. Lim entered the
class she cried. She had associated the presence of Ms. Lim with fear. In
other words, she has been conditioned to respond by crying whenever
encountering Ms. Lim even though she had not yelled, Keep Quiet.
Stimulus Generalisation Suzy has learned to associate fear with Ms
Lim. Could that fear generalise to other teachers? Stimulus generalisation
occurs when the organism responds to stimuli that are similar or related.
If Suzy cried each time any teacher (other than Ms. Lim) entered the class,
than Suzy has generalised. For example, in Watsons experiments, Little
Albert avoided any thing that was furry indicating that the child has
generalised fear to stimuli that is similar or related to the white rat.
Stimulus Discrimination When other teachers enter the class, Suzy
does not cry but when she encounters Ms. Lim she cries. Apparently,
her classically conditioned response seems to be limited to one stimulus;
Ms. Lim. It appears that Suzy is showing signs of stimulus discrimination.
Extinction Suzy has associated Ms. Lim with the yelling of Keep Quiet
which terrified her. However, if the stimulus (yelling Keep Quiet) is not
applied and the response has not generated over a period of time, then the
probability of conditioned behaviour (crying) may decay. If Suzy had not
heard Ms. Lim yell Keep Quiet for some time, it is possible that crying
whenever Ms. Lim appears would gradually become extinct.
18
TOPIC 2
2.6
C O N N E C T I O N I S M - E D WA R D L .
THORNDIKE
Edward Thorndike (1874 1949), whose doctoral thesis entitled Animal
Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Process in Animals
in 1898, formed the basis for his learning theories. To Thorndike the most
basic form of learning was trial-and-error learning which was based on his
experiments which involved putting a hungry animal in a puzzle box (see
Figure 2.3). The animal (he used cats) would attempt to escape to get at
the food outside the box. Pressing on the pedal would enable the animal
to escape. Before escaping, the animal would have to engage in a series
of complex responses. The animal would squeeze through an opening and
claw at anything it reaches. The animal had to perform in a certain way
before it was allowed to leave the box.
The animal claws all over the box
in an impulsive struggle to get
out of the confinement. In the
process presses the pedal and the
door opens. It gets out and eats
the food. The same cat was put
in the box over and over again.
Thorndike noted the time it took
the animal to solve the problem
as a function of the number of
trials or opportunities. The time
it took to solve the problem
systematically decreased as the
number of trials increased.
In other words, the more opportunities the animal had, the faster it solved
the problem. The animal has made a connection between the proper
response and the food the cat received (Stimulus-Response or S-R
connection). Based on his experiments, Thorndike concluded that learning
is incremental. In other words, learning occurs in very small systematic
steps rather than in huge jumps.
Based on his experiments, Thorndike proposed the following theories of
19
learning:
The Law of Readiness
The law of readiness states that when an organism is ready to act, it will
do so. When it is not ready to act, forcing it to act will be annoying. In
other words, when someone is ready to perform act, to do is satisfying
while not doing so is annoying.
The Law of Exercise
The law of exercise states that the strength of a connection between a stimulus
and a response is determined by how often the connection is established.
In other words, maintaining connection between the stimulus and response
strengthens the connection (Law of Use). The connection between the
stimulus and response is weakened when practice is discontinued (Law of
Disuse).
The Law of Effect
The law of effect states that the strength of a connection between a
stimulus and a response is influenced by the consequence of a response.
For example, if a response is followed by a satisfying state of affairs, the
strength of the connection is increased. If a response is followed by an
annoying state of affairs, the strength of the connection is decreased.
2.7
I M P L I C AT I O N S O F T H O R N D I K E S
THEORIES
Thorndike developed the idea of connectionism. He believed that
connections formed between a stimulus and a response (S-R) is the essence
of intellectual development. People of higher intellect formed more bonds
between stimuli and response and formed them more easily than people
of lower ability.
Complex ideas should be broken down into pre-requisite concepts.
Positive reinforcement should be applied as these concepts are learned so
that they can be applied to more complex, higher-level learning activities.
Transfer of learning.
o The degree of transfer between initial and later learning depends on the
match between elements across the two events.
o Transfer depends on the presence of identical elements in the original
20
TOPIC 2
2.8
O P E R A N T C O N D I T I O N I N G B Y B .F .
SKINNER
Burrhus Frederic Skinner was born in the small Pennsylvania town of
Susquehanna. He obtained his masters and doctorate in psychology from
Harvard University. He taught at the University of Minnesota and in 1945
moved to become the chairman of the psychology department at Indiana
University. In 1948, he was invited to teach and do research at Harvard
University where he remained for the rest of this life. He was an active
researcher and guided hundreds of doctoral candidates as well as writing
many books. His most famous book was Walden II, which is a fictional
account of a community run by his behaviourist principles.
B.F. Skinner, made his reputation by testing Watsons and Pavlovs theories
in the laboratory. He rejected the notion that organisms are passive and
have no control whether to act or not to act. He developed the theory of
operant conditioning, which states that we choose to behave in a certain way
because particular behaviour brings about certain consequences (Skinner,
1950). For example, if your girlfriend gives you a kiss when you give her
flowers, you are likely to give her flowers when you want a kiss. You
are acting in expectation of a certain reward. However, Skinner did not
agree that emotions or feelings play any part in determining behaviour.
Our behaviour is determined by the pleasant or unpleasant consequence
of that behaviour.
21
2.8.1
Skinners Experiments
2.8.2
Skinners Experiments
B.F.Skinner 1904-1990
22
TOPIC 2
What happens if the rat is not given any more food pellets? Skinner,
disconnected the food dispenser. When the rat pressed the bar, no food
was released. The rate of bar- pressing was less frequent and finally it
diminished. That is, the operant response undergoes extinction with
nonreinforcement just as in classical conditioning.
Next, Skinner connected back the pellet dispenser. Pressing the bar again
provided the rat with food pellets. The behaviour of bar-pushing popped
right back. In fact, the rat took a lesser time to press the bar compared to
the first time it was put in the box. So, the rat has learned that if it pressed
the bar, food will be released.
Skinner varied the experiment by linking the release of food pellets with
light. For example, the food would only be presented when the bar is
pressed while the light is on but not when the light is off. Guess what
happened! The rat only pressed the bar when the light was on. The light
has served as a discriminative stimulus that controls response. The rat is
able to discriminate between pressing the bar with the light and pressing
the bar without light (Huitt and Hummel, 1998).
Based on this experiment, Skinner introduced the word operant. It simply
means that the behaviour operates on the environment the rats pressing
the bar produces or gains access to the food pellets. In classical conditioning,
the animal is passive; it merely waits for stimuli. In operant conditioning,
the animal is active; its own behaviour brings on important consequences
or results (Skinner, 1998). Thus, operant conditioning increases the
likelihood of a response by following its occurrence with reinforcer.
23
2.8.3
24
TOPIC 2
b) When you enter a car, you put on the safety belt (behaviour) because you
want the sound of the buzzer (reinforcer) to stop.
Punishment: Punishment is not the same as negative reinforcement. The
objective of negative reinforcement is to increase the probability of a particular
behaviour occurring. Punishment has the opposite effect; it decreases the
probability of a behaviour occurring. For example, if the rat is given an
electric shock every time it presses the bar (behaviour), the frequency of
the behaviour occurring will be reduced and finally diminish.
Examples:
a) Farid refuses to help his mother wash the dishes and he is not allowed to
play football.
b) Any student who makes noise in class will have recess time reduced.
25
and goes back to the teachers lounge complaining about the stupid
reinforcement theory.
ACTIVITY
26
2.9
TOPIC 2
SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT
27
2.10
S H A P I N G B E H AV I O U R
2.10.1
A three year old child was afraid to go down a slide. The father picked
him up and put him at the end of the slide and asked him if he was okay.
He was asked to jump and he did and was praised by the father. Next, the
father picked the child and put him a foot or so up the slide and asked
him if he was okay, and asked him to slide down. He did. So far so good!
The father did this again and again, each time moving him a little up the
slide. Eventually, he put the child at the top of the slide and he could
slide all the way down and jump off.
A great deal of human behaviour is modified directionally in small steps
by reinforcement. It has often been observed, for example, that as
previously reinforcing activities become habitual and less rewarding,
they tend to be modified. For example, a motorcyclist derives some
considerable reinforcement from the sensation of turning a sharp corner at
high speed but eventually the sensation diminishes and the excitement
becomes less. And perhaps, too, as the reinforcement begins to decrease,
his speed increases, imperceptibly but progressively.
This is a clear illustration of shaping effected through the outcomes of
behaviour (Lefrancois, 1982). In the classroom, peer approval or disapproval,
28
TOPIC 2
ACTIVITY
2.11
A P P LY I N G O P E R A N T
CONDITIONING IN THE
CLASSROOM
Biehler and Snowman (1986) in their book Psychology Applied to Teaching,
suggested the following classroom practices based on the principles of
operant conditioning.
When students are dealing with factual material, do your best to give
FEEDBACK frequently, specifically and quickly.
o After giving a problem, go over the correct answer immediately
afterward.
o Have pupils team up and give each other feedback.
o Meet with students in small groups so that you can give each pupil
more individual feedback.
o When you assign reading or give a lecture or demonstration, have a
short self-corrected quiz or an informal Q&A session immediately
afterward.
When older students are dealing with complex and meaningful material,
29
30
TOPIC 2
ACTIVITY
Discuss.
31
ACTIVITY
Read the following situations and state whether they are examples of
classical or operant conditioning.
1. In order to punish my cat for sleeping on the sofa, I paired the sound
of a clicker with getting squirted with water. Now the sound of the
clicker causes the animal to get off the sofa.
2. When my son has gone for a week without arguing with his sister,
he gets to choose which favorite activity he wants to engage in on
Friday night
3. In a weight management class, participants earn points for every
healthy meal they eat and every period of exercise they complete.
Later these points result in refunds of their class fees.
4. When I first start teaching about a concept, Ill praise any answer that
is close to the right answer.
5. Each morning when I switch on the radio, my dogs bark and I give
them dog a slice of bread each. After a while, every time I switch on
the radio in the morning, my dogs bark.
REFERENCES
Biehler, D. and Snowman, G. (1986). Psychology of learning applied
to teaching. Newark: Wardsworth
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (1997). An introduction to operant
(instrumental) conditioning. Educational Psychology Interactive.
Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/behsys/operant.html.
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (1998). An overview of the behavioral
perspective. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA:
Valdosta State University. http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/
behsys/behsys.html.
Skinner, B.F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological
Review, 57(4), 193-216.
32
TOPIC 2
Skinner, B.F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching.
Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86-97.
Watson, J. (1913). Psychology as the Behaviorist Views it.
Psychological Review, 20, 158-177.
Watson, J. B. and Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. 3(1). 1-14.
33