Introduction To Fault Analysis 1.0 Timing, Protective Systems, and Fault Types
Introduction To Fault Analysis 1.0 Timing, Protective Systems, and Fault Types
Introduction To Fault Analysis 1.0 Timing, Protective Systems, and Fault Types
Fig. 1
In Fig. 1, the fault grounds the middle bus.
There are five paths to ground in this
4
Fig. 2
In Fig. 2, we see that impedance seen by
the generator is 0.000002+j0.1, so that if
the generator voltage is 1.0, the current is
1.0/(0.000002+j0.1)=0.002-j10 pu, a large
current. Protection equipment must be able
to (a) carry the high current (for a short
time); (b) interrupt that high current.
b. Generator acceleration: From the
previous example, we see that the current
5
Fig. 3
The situation we will study is analogous to
an open circuit generator that suddenly
closes into a faulted power system. The
R+jL is the Thevenin impedance seen from
the terminals of the generator looking into
the faulted power system.
Assume that the voltage source is given by
v(t ) Vm sin( t )
(1)
The parameter provides a way to control
the timing of when the switch is closed.
Using a trig identity, we can see that the
above can be written as:
v(t ) Vm (sin t cos cos t sin )
(2)
10
s sin cos
2
2
2
2
s
(4)
RI ( s) LsI ( s ) Li (0) Vm
RI ( s) LsI ( s ) Vm
(5)
Vm
L
R
/
L
s sin cos
2
2
2
2
s
(6)
Distributing the two factors through yields:
Vm
Vm
s sin
cos
L
L
I ( s)
s R / L s 2 2 s R / L s 2 2
11
(7)
where
Vm
sin t sin e Rt / L
Z
(8)
L
tan
R
1
(9)
is the power factor angle, i.e., angle by
which steady-state current lags voltage, and
Z R 2 L
(10)
is the magnitude of the Thevenin impedance.
Notice the qualitative difference between the
two terms inside the curly brackets of (8).
The first term, call it i1(t), is a sinusoidal
12
Vm
sin t
Z
(11)
The second term, call it i2(t), is an
exponentially decreasing function of time, a
DC offset, given by:
Vm
i2 (t )
sin e Rt / L
Z
(12)
(13)
so that
i2 (t ) i20 e Rt / L
(14)
So the current, i(t), is composed of i1 and i2:
i (t ) i1 (t ) i2 (t )
(15)
One important observation here is that
because the current in the inductor is
zero just before the switch closes,
then the current in the inductor must be
zero just after the switch closes.
13
Voltage (volts)
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Time (seconds)
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Fig. 4
We can calculate:
tan 1 * L / R 1.5178 radians (86.96)
Z R 2 L 18.8761
2
ohms
0.0530 radians (3.04)
16
0.4
current (amperes)
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
time (sec)
17
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Fig. 5
Some observations:
The dotted red curve, i1, is the steadystate term, and oscillates for all time.
The yellow dashed curve, i2, is the DC
offset term. It is small to begin with and
goes to almost zero after about 0.1 seconds.
The blue solid curve, i, is the composite
current. It becomes the same as i1 after the
DC offset has died (after about 0.1 sec).
The DC offset is so small that it has
almost no affect on the composite current.
Now change =. In this case, the voltage
waveform is almost at a zero, i.e.,
v(t ) Vm sin( t ) v(0) Vm sin( ) 0
A plot of the voltage waveform for this
condition is given in Fig. 6.
18
.
10
8
6
Voltage (volts)
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Time (seconds)
0.14
Fig. 6
In this case, we have that
1.6238 radians (93.04)
Figure 7 shows the results.
19
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.6
i1
-i2
i=i1-i2
0.4
current (amperes)
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
time (sec)
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Fig. 7
Some observations:
The dotted red curve, i1, is the steadystate term, and oscillates for all time.
The yellow dashed curve, i2, is the DC
offset term and goes to almost zero after
about 0.2 seconds.
The blue solid curve, i, is the composite
current. It becomes the same as i1 after the
DC offset has died (after about 0.2
seconds).
20
I (t ) I 12 i 2 (t )
(16)
where I is the rms value of the composite
current, and I1 is the rms value of the steadystate current.
The indicated references [1,2] then show
that the upper bound of |I|()/|I1| is
.
22
3 1.73
23
L=0.05;
Vm=10;
omega=2*pi*60;
alpha=pi/2;
theta=atan(omega*L/R);
zmag=sqrt(R^2+(omega*L)^2);
t=0:.001:0.2;
% a-phase
i1a=(Vm/zmag)*sin(omega*t+alpha-theta);
i2a=-(Vm/zmag)*sin(alpha-theta)*exp(-R*t/L);
ia=i1a+i2a;
% b-phase
i1b=(Vm/zmag)*sin(omega*t+alpha-2.0944-theta);
i2b=-(Vm/zmag)*sin(alpha-2.0944-theta)*exp(-R*t/L);
ib=i1b+i2b;
% c-phase
i1c=(Vm/zmag)*sin(omega*t+alpha+2.0944-theta);
i2c=-(Vm/zmag)*sin(alpha+2.0944-theta)*exp(-R*t/L);
ic=i1c+i2c;
plot(t,ia,'r:',t,ib,'g--',t,ic,'b-');
legend('a-phase','b-phase','c-phase');
ylabel('current (amperes)');
xlabel('time (sec)');
grid
1
a-phase
b-phase
c-phase
0.8
0.6
current (amperes)
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
time (sec)
Fig. 8
24
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
25
Fig. 9
The envelope Imax(t) indicated in Fig. 9 is the
maximum symmetrical current. Division of
2 gives the rms symmetrical
Imax by
current that we previously called I1.
26
Fig. 10
We will get
I1
Eg
R j L
Eg
R jX
(17)
Eg
X
(18)
But of course, (18) only gives us a single
value of the current magnitude, and clearly
the current magnitude decreases with time
during the first few cycles.
27
I: steady-state current
The situation is illustrated in Fig. 11-a and b.
Fig. 11
In Fig. 11-a, we have discretized the current
into three intervals corresponding to I, I,
and I.
Correspondingly, in Fig. 11-b, we have
discretized the generator reactance into three
intervals corresponding to X, X, and X.
If the generator is unloaded when the fault
occurs, with internal voltage of Eg, then the
29
X d''
I
I
(19)
Eg
X d''
(19)
Eg
Xd
(19)
The above analysis applies to a smooth-rotor
machine. It is more complex for a salient
rotor machine, but smooth rotor analysis
gives good approximations for a salient pole
machine.
30
31
32
Boston, 1987.
3[] J. Nilsson, Electric Circuits, second edition, Addison Wesley, 1986.