Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 38 views

    When Plants Listen: Daniel Moreno Andrés

    Uploaded by

    FelipeTorresD
    Plants are able to detect vibrations produced by environmental stimuli like wind and feeding insects. A recent study found that the plant Arabidopsis thaliana can detect the vibrations made by caterpillars chewing on its leaves. The study recorded vibrations from chewing caterpillars and other stimuli and played them back to A. thaliana leaves. Leaves exposed to chewing vibrations increased production of chemical defenses after subsequent caterpillar feeding. This suggests plants can use vibration detection to prime their chemical defenses against herbivore attack. However, the mechanisms by which plants detect vibrations and how this impacts plant-insect interactions requires further research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    When Plants Listen: Daniel Moreno Andrés

    Uploaded by

    FelipeTorresD
    38 views7 pages
    Plants are able to detect vibrations produced by environmental stimuli like wind and feeding insects. A recent study found that the plant Arabidopsis thaliana can detect the vibrations made by caterpillars chewing on its leaves. The study recorded vibrations from chewing caterpillars and other stimuli and played them back to A. thaliana leaves. Leaves exposed to chewing vibrations increased production of chemical defenses after subsequent caterpillar feeding. This suggests plants can use vibration detection to prime their chemical defenses against herbivore attack. However, the mechanisms by which plants detect vibrations and how this impacts plant-insect interactions requires further research.

    Original Description:

    A bit of plant science

    Original Title

    When Plants Listen

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Plants are able to detect vibrations produced by environmental stimuli like wind and feeding insects. A recent study found that the plant Arabidopsis thaliana can detect the vibrations made by caterpillars chewing on its leaves. The study recorded vibrations from chewing caterpillars and other stimuli and played them back to A. thaliana leaves. Leaves exposed to chewing vibrations increased production of chemical defenses after subsequent caterpillar feeding. This suggests plants can use vibration detection to prime their chemical defenses against herbivore attack. However, the mechanisms by which plants detect vibrations and how this impacts plant-insect interactions requires further research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    38 views7 pages

    When Plants Listen: Daniel Moreno Andrés

    Uploaded by

    FelipeTorresD
    Plants are able to detect vibrations produced by environmental stimuli like wind and feeding insects. A recent study found that the plant Arabidopsis thaliana can detect the vibrations made by caterpillars chewing on its leaves. The study recorded vibrations from chewing caterpillars and other stimuli and played them back to A. thaliana leaves. Leaves exposed to chewing vibrations increased production of chemical defenses after subsequent caterpillar feeding. This suggests plants can use vibration detection to prime their chemical defenses against herbivore attack. However, the mechanisms by which plants detect vibrations and how this impacts plant-insect interactions requires further research.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 7

    When plants listen

    Daniel Moreno Andrs April 20, 2015


    Filed under

    Credits: Daniel Moreno


    Everybody has heard about that. They say that plants are able to hear. Who has not ever
    heard from someone or read somewhere that talking to your plants makes them grow better
    and to be more splendid than if you treat them like a vegetable? You can believe it or not,
    but believer or skeptic, you may have asked yourself this question: How could they hear
    without ears and what for? Nowadays, nobody expects plants to have obvious sound
    receptors, but after centuries studying the plant kingdom still no apparent sound sensor has
    been found. Furthermore an evolutionary question remains. Sound perception seems to be
    pretty useful for those living beings able to move in order to hunt or to scape, being always
    on alert, in fast interaction with the environment. However, what could be the evolutionary
    utility of this capacity in motionless beings, whose speed and kind of movement, in the best
    case, allow them to close on themselves, but not to run out of danger.
    With time, science has found some evidences about plants reacting against vibrations and a
    wide range of acoustic energy frequencies (including music), but it is still intriguing the

    reason of those behaviors in the context of ecology. In a recent paper1, they have found a
    practical reason for Arabidopsis thaliana to listen, or at least to make use of meaningful
    environmental acoustic vibrations. In a really smart experimental setup they have been able
    to observe that those plants react to the vibrations produced by a caterpillar eating leaves.
    That reaction comes in the form of an improved production of certain chemical compounds
    known to affect the growth and fitness of many insects.

    Figure 1. A) Experimental setup to transmit vibrations to the leaves, showing a green


    piezoelectric actuator (upper left) and a modified speaker (lower right) connected to the
    playback leaf recording. B) View of the cages used to confine feeding caterpillars to
    individual leaves; two leaves were sampled for chemistry and one leaf was sampled for
    gene expression studies. C) Vibration waves of a chewing caterpillar on thaliana, wind and
    a leafhopper. Chewing and leafhopper song have similar amplitude spectra but different
    temporal features. | Credit: Abbel & Cocroft (2014)
    In fact they have been able to record the vibrations produced for a feeding caterpillar and
    the wind on the leaves of A. thaliana using laser vibrotomes; and also the song of a
    leafhopper on another plant. Then later, using that experimental setup they transmitted
    those vibrations to the leaves (Figure 1). For the chewing and the leafhopper song a
    piezoelectric actuator was used as high-frequency vibration transmitter. But due to the very
    low-frequency of wind, the former method was useless and a modified speaker with a stick
    worked as actuator.

    Figure 2: Vibrations produced by a feeding caterpillar on an A. thaliana leaf (Playback leaf,


    pbl) and the vibrations registered on a systemic leaf (sl) with the same age but 5 cm away
    from the feeding point. | Credit: Abbel & Cocroft (2014)
    When a caterpillar is chewing a leaf, that vibrational energy is transmitted to other leaves
    from the same plant (Figure 2). And what Appel and coworkers found is that those leaves
    exposed to chewing vibrations by playback, and also the systemic leaves from the same
    plant, produce higher amounts of some chemical defenses like glucosinolates and
    anthocyanins (Figure 3). But importantly, this effect is observable only when after that
    fake exposure the leaf was chewed by a real caterpillar for a while (allowing it eat up to
    30% of the leaf). In the same conditions, vibrations induced by playing back wind or
    leafhopper songs do not increase the production of those chemical defenses.

    Figure 3: Left panel. A) Caterpillar-chewing playbacks increased the amount of


    glucosinolates in those leaves subsequently fed upon by caterpillars. In contrast, the small
    rosette center leaves (without subsequent fed upon did not show an increase. B) Grayscale
    map showing the increase in aliphatic glucosinolates in the playback and same-age
    systemic leaves, expressed as the percent change from the levels in controls. Right panel.
    Chewing vibrations but not wind or leafhopper songs increased the amount of anthocyanin
    after caterpillar herbivory in A. thaliana. | Credit: Abbel & Cocroft (2014)

    However the question remains of whether the observed increase in these chemical defenses
    is enough to effectively stop the attackers or wether it is ecologically irrelevant. Both
    glucosinolates and anthocyanin have biological activity oninsects and estimations from the
    authors based on the observed increase of glucosinolates point to a 20% reduction in
    growing rate of caterpillars; but it is unclear what would be the biological effect of
    anthocyanin in this case.
    Anyway, it looks like if the sound of a threat would make the plant be more prepared to
    deal with a new imminent attack. But the mechanism of this priming behavior against
    herbivores is still unknown. Many hypothesis are still open, it could be that the vibrational
    information triggers cellular mechanosensors that ultimately elicit the release of phloemtransported chemical signals or volatile hormones. The acoustic energy could also
    collaborate with other chemical or electric signals released after herbivore-induced damage
    in order to boost the plant defense system. Furthermore, such a skill could provide to the
    plant for a fastest and long distance mechanism to transduce signals not only in itself but
    also through the community of plants via their contacting branches and roots.
    Therefore, vibration is suggested as a new player in plantherbivore insects interaction.
    Opening up a new field of research in this curious phenomenon that might one day render a
    pesticide in the form of a compact disc or a music file

    References
    1. Appel, H. M. & Cocroft, R. B. Plants respond to leaf vibrations caused by insect
    herbivore chewing. Oecologia175, 125766 (2014).

    Share

    Written by
    Daniel Moreno Andrs

    Daniel Moreno Andrs holds a PhD in Biochemistry. From 2006 to 2009 he developed his
    predoctoral research at the Nutrient-Mediated Signaling Unit of the Instituto de
    Biomedicina de Valencia-CSIC. Afterwards he was a postdoctoral researcher at the
    Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology of the University of Ulm (Germany).
    Currently he is a postdoctoral researcher in The Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max
    Planck Institute in Tbingen (Germany).

    Website: http://jindetres.blogspot.com.es/

    Twitter: @banchsinger

    Latest Articles for the Author

    Wearable biosensors, the next level in the information age

    Transcriptional noise seems to correlate with more closed chromatin


    environments.

    Bakers Yeast Against Pain: Alkaloids production from glucose

    Single-Cell Barcoding: Another way to understand the behaviour of a cell


    population

    Related Articles

    Let there be fascinating plants

    Smoke-derived chemicals promote seed germination

    At the crossroads of Botany and Archaeology

    Towards the generation of tubers in non-tuberizing plants: Can a tomato


    plant make pota

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy