Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 125 views

    Santiago V Gonzales

    Uploaded by

    Kat Jolejole
    The owner informed a construction firm of his intention to cancel their contract. The firm then stopped construction work, claiming they were not paid fees on time. The court held that the firm was not liable because the owner had already expressed his intention to cancel the contract, so the firm stopping work was justified.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Santiago V Gonzales

    Uploaded by

    Kat Jolejole
    125 views1 page
    The owner informed a construction firm of his intention to cancel their contract. The firm then stopped construction work, claiming they were not paid fees on time. The court held that the firm was not liable because the owner had already expressed his intention to cancel the contract, so the firm stopping work was justified.

    Original Description:

    santiago v gonzales digest

    Original Title

    Santiago v Gonzales

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The owner informed a construction firm of his intention to cancel their contract. The firm then stopped construction work, claiming they were not paid fees on time. The court held that the firm was not liable because the owner had already expressed his intention to cancel the contract, so the firm stopping work was justified.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    125 views1 page

    Santiago V Gonzales

    Uploaded by

    Kat Jolejole
    The owner informed a construction firm of his intention to cancel their contract. The firm then stopped construction work, claiming they were not paid fees on time. The court held that the firm was not liable because the owner had already expressed his intention to cancel the contract, so the firm stopping work was justified.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    [G.R. No. L-36627. October 20, 1977.

    ]
    SEVERO J. SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. EUGENIO JUAN
    GONZALEZ, ET. AL., Respondents-Appellees
    Facts:
    Regarding a contract of sale with a construction firm, the owner wrote the
    firm that he intended to cancel the contract, whereupon the firm stopped
    construction work for alleged non-payment of fees at the proper time.
    Issue:
    Is the firm liable?
    Held:
    No. For after all, the adverse party had already informed the firm of the
    formers intention to cancel or rescind the contract.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy