Application Thermo Metall
Application Thermo Metall
Application Thermo Metall
Procee~ings
Edited by G.R.Fitterer
PAR rfl
CONTENTS
Page
'''
ix
word
VAILABILITY OF FUNDAMENTAL
I lllmMODYNAMIC DATA
Ji,,, 1 mrm :
N11 f 111
I,
i1
I 11 ll I Lute Alloys
Ii v llr . John Chi pman, Emeritus Professor of Metallurgy
23
39
53
111
1111
I llll
67
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
105
153
179
197
Discussion
221
...
'
81
'l'lu~
vI
..
249
Low Pressure
11.Y llr. Paul Gilles, Professor, Department of
l'hmn1stry, University of Kansas
1111d
281
I'
299
325
337
343
t ' 111111 111t 111 1.J11 Non - F rrous Industries and a Note
1111 I I l 11111 t. I011 nf' II ILL apaci ty
! 1' 11111
111 11.11. Kt I log g , F.xtractive Metallurgy,
1 11 I11111111 It 1111 I v111 lt.y, Ntw York City
357
v 11
367
385
391
7.
Discussion
399
8.
Participants
409
4.
5.
6.
'
v I 11
FOREWORD
I'1111I01'111
I 111.rn l oh.I
ti v
of th
n ll o v1r Lho world who were eit her c urrently con1111w t.h1 r 1110<1.v1mmI dnLn LLlld pr i ncipl s or who were
l.11 1L1H1l ,Y Liu 111 Ln 1io 111111t r 1111 m t ullurgical pr c ss
1111111
Ix
G.R.Fitterer
Director of the Center
March 1967
'
PANEL I
THE CURRENT STATUS AND AVAILABILITY
OF FUNDAMENTAL THERMODYNAMIC DATA
Chairman
Dr.Frederick D.Rossini
Dean, College of Science, Notre Dame University
'l' ht
~1etallurgy,
'1'111
Ltlc ulation of Phase Boundaries in
Mo I.id lie Systems
tt
tdm
Institute of Technology
~1LLu 1d n.rd
Ill
11111
PANEL I
Dr. Frederick D.Rossini
1,1 dies and Gentlemen, it is a great pleasure for me to open this
I I 1rt l. Hess ion of the Symposium on Applications of Fundamental Thermoilv1111m I s t o Metallurgical Processes . As Dr.Fitterer has said, this
I 1111tainly one of the most important subjects facing us today.
11!1 l.n11ic for discussion under Panel I in this first session is the
1 111 ,.,111, Status and Availability of Fundamenta1 Thermodynamic Data.
' 11 I I lcnow from experience how seemingly little thermodynamic data
I l.11 I.hat we would like to have available for us, but at the same
I 11111 w11 recognize that there does in fact exist an enormous quantity
111 I ht rrnodynami c data of all kinds scattered throughout the literal 111 11 I' Lhe world. our big problem is to know precisely what data
I I ILll<l how to put them in their proper frameworks so that they
1 111 111 11 H d easily and efficiently.
Next we need to evaluate these
11111 1111d t hen to determine what data are missing from the literature
1Ii111111 hont t he world and what new data must be obtained. This brings
f 11 Lilt big pr oblem facing science today - the storage and
I 1I1 vr I f quantitative scientific information. Many simple facts
11 II c oct d, stored and retrieved by machines, but the problem of
1111d ret rieving what we may call quantitative scientific
1111111111 I. I on is not so simple, because careful appraisal of much
1111 I ~ I tm I materi al is required to recover the full significance and
of such data.
these ki nds of information, thermodynamic data are
111 st i mportant. Data on the thermodynamic properties of
t (:ul materi als and material systems are becoming more and
I1 l in our modern science and technology. I think we can
t.h1 ndvance of science r ests heavily upon quantitative
The better and more accurately we can
I 1 1111!1 me uHur , t he better and more precise l y we can develop
11 1 11 I 1 1 Lo 1 x.1>lain the nat ure of t hi ngs in our world.
To give us
111 11 111. Into t h current status and availability of fundamental
'"'"tlv11111111i' rlL n, wo have a pane l of five eminent scientists with
1 w1111 ld 11111 now to introduce t hese gentlemen to you in the
r I 1 I 11 wll I1 h I. hoy will present t heir r eports. Beginning on my
ltt 111111 v1111 r 1n l'L Aid Dr. Ralph Hultgr en, Profes sor of
f California at Berkeley; Dr .Oswal d
1 111 w h I , Ile 11I11r l'r I 11 c I pn l
c I c nL ifi Offi r at t he National
t 11 l 1,11l111111t 111,v l11'1'11dcll11 "l.011 , l:1w. l1L11cl , who IH urr ntly visiting
I
1al lh1 1111lv1111 1t ,v 111 I' ll.I. ll11 r11h: l)1..Joh11 C:h11J1n11n,
t ht
11111
1 1111
I hnt
:1
DR.FREDERICK D.ROSSINI
Professor (Emeritus) of Metallurgy at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology; Dr.C.B.Alcock, Professor of Chemical Metallurgy at the
Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, England, who
is currently visiting professor at the North Carolina state
University; Dr.Everett R.Johnson, of the Office of Standard Reference
Data at the National Bureau of standards. our session this morning
will consist of presentations of about 15 or more minutes in length
by each of our five panelists . This will be .followed by an intra- .
panel discussion of approximately 20 or 25 minutes . This will leave
about a 30 minute period in which we can have questions and answers
involving audience participation. For this last question and
answer period, there will be cards distributed to you so that you
can write down your questions and the name of the panelist to whom
you wish to address your question . These cards will be collected in
time to be activated at the final question and answer period. l
hope very much that every member of the audience will feel free to
participate actively in this question and answer period.
our first paper is by Professor Ralph Hultgren, who will discuss
Additional Data Needed to Establish the Thermodynamic Properties of
Alloying Systems .
'
Ralph Hultgren
Professor of Metallurgy , University of California
It would be much easier to describe the data we have than what we
because we have so little and need so much . The data can be
ii 1rwussed under three categories :
111111<1
(1 )
(2 )
(3 )
It
11 11. In nt meas ur ements of elements are the low- and high' 1111111111L1,ur heat capaciti es and enthalpies and heat capacities of
" 11
11il ulat ed from spectroscopic data. From these measurements
111 1111 01il u1ated th e ent halpies , entropies, and Gibbs energy
111111111111 1 of t h
1
111
"
11 111111 1! I 1
RALPH HULTGREN
higher melting metals, to temperatures well over 1000c. Techniques
for heat content measurements at truly high temperatures need to be
developed.
The paucity of liquid data for the elements is, however,
astonishing. It would seem that these measurements went out of
fashion forty or more years ago . Data on even simple and important
metals date mainly from that time and are often seriously in error.
It is probably true that liquid heat capacities decline with
temperature increase; the measurements are sufficiently accurate to
show this in only a few cases. As an example, our laboratory had
occasion to measure liquid tin and liquid silver recently and found
notably different latent heats of fusion and heat contents from the
best values found in the literature . The state of affairs is shown
in Figure 1.
Binary alloys are much more inadequately studied. Of 3160
possible combinations, only 166 are listed. When it is remembered
that the data on some of the listed systems are very sketchy indeed,
the magnitude of the work to be done can be appreciated. Trans
uranic metals and rare ones (Tc, Po, Fr, Ra, Ac, Pa) are not
represented at all and only five systems involving lanthanides were
found. Of the remaining 49 metals less than 6% of the systems are
covered . This distribution of the systems is shown in Figure 2.
Most of the systems are between the more common, low-melting
metals. The transitionmetals, except for iron, are a vast wasteland. The intensity of coverage of the 12 systems involving iron is
usually low. It would seem that in this area data badly needed for
modern technology is almost entirely lacking.
The reasons for the neglect are technical . Transition metals are
high-melting and easily contaminated especially by elements difficult
to detect as C, H, ...N, 0, etc:' Acid solution calorimetry is
inaccurate and most of the metals will not dissolve with sufficient
rapidity in solvents such as tin. The products of combustion bomb
calorimetry may be complex and difficult to quantitatively identify.
Equilibrium emf measurements have to be carried out a high temperatures where techniques ..have not been well developed; moreover,
electropositivities may not differ enough for easy measurement s .
vapor pressure measu r ements lo.ok t he most promising, but t chn iques
fl
::
--~ - -
H I
I
IO
12
II
13
14
15
16
17
18
He
I
I
He Li
2
Ne
3
Ar
Be
Si
Na
Mg
Al
:-Mg : Al
: 0
: 0
ca
SC
Ti
Cr
Mn
Fe
co
Ni
cu
Zn
Ga
Sr
Ne
Cl
Ar
Kr
Rb
Zr
Nb
Mo
Ma
Ru
Rh
Pd
Ag
Cd
Ge
As
Se
Br
::a
0
In
>--3
Sn
Sb
Te
cs
Bo
LO
Hf
Ta
Re
Os
Ir
Pt
Au
Hg
Tl
Pb
Bi
Po
At
Rn
Fr
Ra
Ac
Th
Pa
Np
Pu
Rn
Arr. Cm
7
0
Kr
!
.....
(")
.....
l:r:l
r:tJ.
>
~
~
.....
~
~
r:tJ.
f}3
Ce
Ga
Fig.1.
Pr
Nd
11
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm Yb
0
Lu
0
X =satisfactory, O =unsatisfactory
- 0n
-'H-,
10
12
II
13
14
15
16
17
18
He
I
I
He Li
Be
:-Mg : Al
Ne
Si
Cl
Ar
Ge
AS
Se
Br
Kr
2
g
Ne
No
Mg
Al
Ar
10
16
15
ca
SC
: 16 : 15
Ti
er
Mn
Fe
co
Ni
Cu
Zn
GO
11
Rh
Pd
Ag
Cd
15
17
13
21
Ir
Pt
Au
Hg
Tl
Pb
16
17
13
Rb
Sr
Zr
Nb
Mo
MO
cs
Bo
LO
l;lf
To
Re
Rn
Fr
RO
Ac
Th
Po
Np
Pu
. 0
Ce
Pr
Nd
11
Sm
Eu
Gd
12
Ru
16
16
In
Sn
Sb
Te
5I
0
Os
19
Bi
Po
At
18
16
Tm Yb
Lu
Am Cm
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
60I
0
::r:
Cl
Fig.2.
;g
Kr
==
Rn
With Data
Total
11
814
14
1015
459
111111 r M tals
49
166
2695
111 111 1
80
166
3160
1t11rn M t als
( I f , ~ I Po , Fr, Ra, Ac, . Pa)
r ~ l~ . 3 .
RALPH HULTGREN
are stable . Composition variance of the phase is then treated as
solid solubility with, perhaps, assumptions made as to the ideality
of the solution .
It would take too much time to show how this leads to confusion
in some cases . In my opinion, these phases could be treated as are
alloy phases of variable composition . Partial and integral quantities
should then be tabulated as functions of composition.
The amount of data in this field is small but rapidly increasing.
I have at present no way of citing statistics of coverage, but it is
certainly small. We hope at my laboratory to develop these
fragmentary ideas I have mentioned within the next few years .
...
.1
10
O.Kubaschewski
Senior Principal Scientific Officer
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex
1,, - 1,M111 ,
or
u:1,
It
O.KUBASCHEWSKI
the investigators, but even in certain liquid alloys equilibration
may be delayed by slow diffusion. This applies in particular to
metals that exhibit pronounced short-range order in the liquir. state
(e.g. Bi, Ga). One can assess the partial heats and entropies of
solution in the system gallium-zinc, for example, from the
calorimetric work of Kleppa (SJ and the e.m.f. measurements of
Svirbely and Read ( 6 J and Genta, Fiorani and Valenti ( 7 l and
calculate the liquidus curve by means of the equation
(1)
where .6.Hi and .6.si are the partial heat and entropy of solution of
1 g-atom i (= Ga or Zn) in an alloy of given composition, and Li
and cri the heat and entropy of fusion of pure i. The small solid
solubilities may be disregarded .
The resulting liquidus curve was found to disagree near the
eutectic composition with the earlier experimental results:
Figure 1. An attempt to check the results by normal thermal
analysis by Chart (BJ produced similar results to the earlier ones,
the alloys showing a very strong tendency towards super-cooling.
200;--------------~
Put.chin
c t . al
Valent i
and
.6
Heumann
Fioroni
and
Prcdcl
C.olculotcd
Prcunt
Zn
work
..
cryatal found
150
...
.u
100
/;
.1/
...
>!
so
/0
.
G'l
I
"
I' I IC . I .
Ot - 7.11 11:11L1 r
10
20
(, !ti f;(lffi(loil
( '.
I I, I rm Corre
50
Li d
(2)
I.It
I 11w1
I 11
11
h1
Dh 111
I.he
nr mtxL11r1
low1 HI.
hml 1Ll1H1
O.KUBASCHEWSKI
ATOM IC
FRACTION
6.G
ATOMIC
Fig.2.
FRACTION
Atomic Fraction
or
oc
1000
40
60
900
800
700
600
Mo
20
Cr
At 0 /o Cr
l'lv. . a.
80
OtLl)
i n th
Solid State
O.KUBASCHEWSKI
Bi-Zn
700
600
500
400
300
Bi
02
0 4
06
08
Zn
-Nzn
Fig.4.
17
O.KUBASCHEWSKI
E
...
0
0
+100
I
C7'
c:
0
-100
....0
0
-200
>C7'
L..
~
c:
~
-300
~
~
L..
u..
-400
20
Fe
40
60
80
Cr
Atomic percent Cr
Fig . 5.
ot.
I'
I ..
/.
600
o<.'
I / 1a
700
I
I
.(
. /
:. I
ol'..+
3+ct.'
500
400
ol+oL'
JOOL-~---'~~~~~~~~~~~
Fe
20
60
40
80
Cr
Atomic /o Cr
Fig. 6.
11:vo n so, the thermochemical method cannot fully replace the con1111L I 011 al methods, for the simple reason that all the stable phases
I 11 IL 11,YHtem must first be known before the thermochemical investi1111 I 1111 an begin, and, of course, structures, densities and other
11111111 rLl s of the various phases are also required in addition to
1111 11huH boundaries.
lf 11w1 v r, t he restricti on that the thermochemical method depends
Lht Aupport by conventional methods is overcompensated by the
1111111 1111, of ad dit ion a l information it presents. The equilibrium
'd I 11 111i11 1.1; part of the free en ergy diagram and not vice versa. In
11 y nrllh t of process metallurgy it will be necessary to know the
11111 11 111 t. ho.t will be pr esent i n equilibrium, but the knowledge of
. t h1 r111t
n rgy r lations hips gi ves additional information on the
r 1111 I 1 <.1111 llbrium con ntratiom1 and pressures . Th is appli es , of
11111 1, t.n 1 11 t.ypoA of mt allurgi 1 r n 1011 1::1 wh r
quilibri um
Hll ,
0.KUBASCHEWSKI
is approached or attained, be it the production and/or refining of
metals and alloys, be it contamination of metals by refractories or
similar problems. The thermodynamic assessment of the purification
of 'spent' reactor fuels by the method of partition between a liquid
metal and a fused salt presented by I.Johnson to this conference is
a good example that demonstrates the usefulness of thermodynamic
data of alloys.
The method of evaluating phase boundaries from such data is, of
course, not confined to alloys : salt mixtures may be similarly
treated. Examples of this application were given in an earlier
paper ( 2 0 >.
The thermochemical method may eventually acquire some considerable
significance for the estimation of phase boundaries in ternary and
multicomponent systems. In a ternary system, the free energy curves
of the binaries assume the form of free energy surfaces and the
tangents become tangent planes. Graphical evaluation would be too
cumbersome, and Gomputers will have to be used.
It is envisaged that the heats and entropies of the ternary
phases may often be estimated from the thermochemical properties of
the corresponding binary phases. Much more experimental work on
ternary alloy systems is thus called for in order to establish
these relationships.
Figure 7 shows an attempt to calculate the phase diagram of the
iron-chromium-nickel system at 65o0 c. No claim is made that the
diagram is even approximately correct; it is supposed merely to
serve as an example of . what one might aim at. The thermochemical
properties of the binary diagrams are known. For the sake of
simplification it was assumed that the excess free energies of the
ternary alloys can be obta~~ ed additively from those of the
isostructural birt"ary phases and that the entropies of the ternary
alloys can be calculated by means of the equation
F~-cr-Ni
650
- - -
c
Cook
and
Brown
0 8
~LJ.<~--''---;o~-8;;-~~----;;0~6:--_____
~~~0~4~~~~0~2=--~~---lNi
N Fe
Fig.7
REFERENCES
( l ll!1!i) .
11
.J . lr1 .~ t.M11t.
O.KUBASCHEWSKI
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15 .
16.
17.
A.F. Cook and F.W.Jones, I.Iron and S te e l Ins t. 148, 217 (1943).
18.
19 .
20.
'
'
..
E ( 3)
2
+ E2 ( 2 ) x
= (o Zn y~ Cl x 3 )
+ E 2 ( 3 ) x3 + E 2 ( 4 ) x 11 +
xl .....
1.
(1)
-v.
1
(2)
= RT
E ( 3 )x
2
(3)
The quantity F 2 x3 is the extra partial molal free energy of component 2 occasioned by the addition of component 3. This extra
free energy is a linear function of concentration within a finite
range, at least within the limits of present-day experimental
accuracy. For example in the case of sulfur or oxygen or nitrogen
in liquid iron, the slope Cl Zn yi/Cl xj= E{ is constant up to 10
percent or more of nickel or manganese or chromium; for other
solutes such as silicon or carbon, deviations occur at lower
concentrations .
* Emeritus Prof ssor of M tallurgy
= (oHx3/Clx
2
and Hx 3 = ~( 3 )x
2
(4)
= (osx23;Clx
x -. 1
and sx 3 = a-( 3 )x
2
2 3
(5)
Rx 3
2
---
(7)
d( 1/T)
'
I 11 111 H
e:{ and
111 11
E; =
(:I) =
(9)
Ml
wit I ch the M's are the atomic weights. Corresponding terms for
111 11 1.tn,y and entropy are hp) = oH; 3;0[33] and s;3) = os;3;o[% 3].
11t1 I 1 n lat ions to the corresponding mole-fraction terms are:
111
100~ h( 3)
M
,I :I
100 ::
( 10)
'~3)
[ M,
~' M,
(11)
El
7rl
I
I
11r
"'
0.
Ii 1n l111 1
.,
"'
/ [% N in alloy]T
(12)
(13)
tN
= !':l_
.6.F = 86 0
'+ 5.
(14)
71 T
This is also the standard free energy of solution in any liquid iron
alloy .
In a given iron alloy let .6.Fa represent the free energy of
solution of half a mole of nitrogen in the hypothetical 1 pct .
solution of N in the alloy. This partakes of the nature of a
'standard' free energy but is a function of alloy composition.
write
} N2
[% N] a
- RT Zn - - -
We
(15)
N2
d(c.Fa/T)
d(l/ T)
all
clla
,J
= -
R( 8 Zn [% N]a \
o (1/ T)
)p
(16)
N2
'I
1 1 ~j
RT Zn [3 N] a/ [3 N in Fe]
+ RT Zn fN [in alloy]
11111
(17)
d(l/T )
d Zn fN
d(l/T)
R---
4. 575
d ej
[% j] __
N
d(l/T)
( 18)
Vnl ues of the heat of solution of nitrogen in iron alloys Lilia are
lv111 by Pehlke and Elliott. (lll Their Fig.22 gives the heat effect
111 1 IL atom of N rather than per mole of N2 as stated. It was
1 d rnwn from the original data in Pehlke' s thesis< 5 1 and is shown
I 11 11' I H. 1. Here the best average straight line is shown in preference
I 11 11 rtain curved lines in the original.
Results of Humbert and
1,l I lnl.t <6 1 for Fe-Cr-N are in good agreement. Data of El Tayeb and
111 1In< ( 7 1 for Fe-V-N and of Nelson ( 8 1 for Fe-C-N are added.
1
11 I 11
1~ {l:ul) 7.0 ~
( Ill )
111 willnh , .N
1 IH th< v11l1Hl at Lit
,/{
+4
Co
+2
~Ho
Ni
'\7.
'\1-
-2
-4
-0
-6
<l
-8
+ C- Nelson
-10
-12
-14
.. 2
10
12
l'' b(. 1 .
II n.t, nf so1ut1
14
-50
0
-100
~
~
i::-
-150
-200
1' 11( ,
2.
250
-25
-20
-15
-5
+5
11 ~
It'!'
~ ( for ~j
(',() )
0) ...
3: 73 kc al inst ad of th
xp ri mouto. I
v1
l11 n
~ =
1. 75
E~
(21)
The activity coefficient of nitrogen, fN= ~/% N at any temperature in any of the iron solutions studied, within the concentration
range in which it is a linear function
of x.,
may now be expressed
.
J
in terms of a single parameter E~ (at about 1600C) and the
concentration of the alloying element.
(lnfN)T=(E~)T
xj=
[3:20_0.ss]
(Ei)1873xj
(22)
t mp ratur .
Th
'111w o
l ' OHll I LH ()
:10
1'11
hiRhly nn c rtain.
IUld Tm11it.nw1 11 .
rkdoi.11ui
(la)
11 11
1111
e~ ( YFel1200<:
-o.~2~~--~o~.1~~__.o~~--07.1~~-+-"""o.2
oC
-2
cu
-4
~
~Z
-6
-8
-10
-0.2
v ( ?)
- 0 .1
eJ
tO . I
+0.2
l'IK.:J.
-w
Fig.4.
771/Ej
s s is 11 kcal instead of 4.1 as suggested by Eq. (8).
HYDROGEN IN LIQUID IRON ALLOYS
The data on heat of solution of hydrogen in liquid iFon alloys
are neither extensive nor convincing. The work of Liang, Bever and
Floe< 19 > indicates essentially constant heat of solution in Fe-Si
alloys up to 21.7 pct Si. Weinstein and Elliott( 20 > determined the
interaction coefficients and heats of solution for a number of
liquid iron alloys at 1592C. Fig.5 contains the results of those
experiments which gave concordant results for h~. The relation is
of the same character as that observed in other groups of systems,
with the notable exception of Fe-Si-H.
HYDROGEN IN ALUMINIUM AIJLOYS
Opie and Grant< 21 > made accurate measurements of the solubility
of hydrogen in molten Al-Cu and Al-Si alloys at 700 - 1000c and
calculated the peat of soi'ution in each alloy. Precise evaluation
of r{iu and ~i is not possible because of uncertainty in the base
line for pure Al, especially the points at 700 and 800.
Accepting the 700 point as correct, and redrawing the line for pure
Al, we find very roughly, ~u = + 70 kcal and ~i = + 18 kcal.
0.2
c(..)
::i:::
~
0.1
:r
..c.
0.1
fi'ig. 5.
1'1 11 1 nll P
11v
1 11KC
2.34.
The
f.h
1 1 111 11111
Wt
11111 1111 [
hl11 t.o
to 11fl f'lll
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
hj
N
kcal
ej
N
P. and E.
ej
N
others
Ref.
1.0 0.2
0.62 0.25
0.13 0.01
0.10 0.04
-0.04 0.04
-0.09 ?
-0. 13 0.04
-0. 31 0.10
-0.40 ?
-0.60 0.09
-0.70 0.05
-1. 34 0. 10
-1. 44 0.10
+0.2 (?)
+0.047
+0. 011
+O . 010
-0.002
+0.006
+0.009
-0. 011
-0.02
-0.034
-0.045
-Q.067
-0.100
+O. 13
+0.065
+O. 007
+0. 010
8
9
9
9
'l'hird
11: 1 ment
c
Si
0
Ni
w
'n
Cn
Mo
Mn
To,
Cr
Cb
+0. 002
-0 . 013
-0.023
9
11
10
-0.045
-0.094
~
22
31
11
10
Ej
N
4
12
1
4
13
-13
-19 ?
-15 5
-53 17
-40
-195 29
-68 5
-220 16
-132 9
7.0
5.9
2.7
2. 5
-3.8
+1. 8
+1
-5.0
-5.2
-27.2
-9.6
-26. 3
-20.9
TABLE II
Summary
<I rnnp
11 I N
1'1 I N
I 11 I 11
I 1 I ll
I
II
l quid
HO lid
11 Qnid
l I qn 1 d
J I au1d
Temp.
oc
77if E{
kcal
Toil17i
RTE{ /77{
1600
1200
1400
1592
900
7.0
8.7
11. 0
10. 8
10?
. 47
. 66
. 69
. 66
. 76
. 53
. 34
. 31
. 34
. 24?
--
:I I
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
E.C.Nelson,
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Trans.Met.So~.A.I.M.E.
...
'
:111
I 1.
(1938).
f !J.
532-535 (1961).
17.
l fl .
(1946).
n.
:~!.
(1963 ).
' :1.
A.LM.E .
:I'/
C.B.Alcock
Professor of Metallurgical Chemistry, Imperial College, London
i\l11-1tract
Although there exists a considerable amount of experimental in/11r mation concerning the thermodynamics of dilute metallic solutions,
11 sa tisfactory theoretical description is still lacking, even for
l1inary systems. For the more complex solutions of the metallurgist,
i.mp le models can be applied to make semiquantitative calculations
using experimental data from binary systems. The extent to which
rnr:ces s can be achieved in this way is reviewed, and a comparison is
mad between calculated and measured activities in ternary solutions.
In the special case of dilute solutions of sulfur and oxygen in
I i'tuid metals, which are of particular interest to the process
111rtnllurgist 1 experimental techniques are still required for the
tndy of systems in which there are strong interactions. Progress
111. this direction is discussed especially with reference to
r le troc hemical 'and mass spectrometric techniques.
C.B.ALCOCK
techniques at our command, than can the problem be solved
theoretically, given an equal involvement of man-years.
Descending from the fundamental theoretical analysis, there exist
however, a number of semi-empirical treatments which enable us to
make reasonably quantitative predictions of the behaviour of, for
example, ternary systems, given data for the composite binary
systems. One procedure is entirely algebraic, and another draws on
the concept of constant pair-wise chemical bonding.
THE ALGEBRAIC ANALYSIS
It is well known that for any binary system at constant temperature, . or for one having an ideal entropy of mixing over a range of
temperatures, the excess partial molar free energy of a component
can be expressed by a power series in the mole fraction thus,
L-Gxs
B
RTX A2
.c:.GB
RT Zn XB + X~(2A2-A1) + x1(2A1-A2)
tJO
axs
/\ B+A/C
(1-XB)
j" [~"
(1~XB)2 d~
X/Xe
-XA
(1~XB)2
J [~"
dx8 ]
-Xe
[-"
GB
(l-X8 )
dX8
=0
XA
=0
1111d
Xe
(i)
1 11i.1 11 l
I 11
CI . 11. X - 0)
8
I 11 y
wl11 110
I\
1 11
(ii)
A+e
RT
1111 )1
11
N .~+A/C
- (a l
+ bl + cl
XA/Y. .. + X
~
+ Xe ( a3 + b3 +
2
ii I
(a
A 2
+ b2 + c2
--;
2 ... . )X
3
=O
-S ) Xe=O
C.B.ALCOCK
where subscripts for the a, b, etc. are 1 when the A+C mixture is
the solvent, 2 when pure A is the solvent, 3 when pure C is the
solvent for the dilute solute B.
Now if we use the fact that
b~
cl
3
XA{b~ + c~ .. }~=O
-} XA/XB
~r~ + c~
(iii)
... }xA=O
. .
wh ere th e excess f ree energy o f mixing
Gxs
A+C
(iv)
~/XA + ~
+XA and
,..
....
A IJ
XA
nB
XB
.0.E
e
RT instead of
nB
11 l11 Lion.
lh r
C-B + A
C.B.ALCOCK
+3.000
Cd - Pb
:Pb-Sb=2:1
0
Pb
-2.000
Sb
= O. 500
Ob - Sb
-3.000
'
1.. 0
o.s
Fig. la.
o.q.
0.6
o. 2.
Cd
0.0
+2.0
+1. 75
+1. 5
+1.25
+1.0
+0, 75
-xs
b.GCd
+0.50
K Cal
+0.25
0
-0.25
-0.50
-o. 75
-1.0
-1.25
-1.50
0 Xcd = 0
El Xcd 0.25
-1. 75
Icd
-2.0
Xcd
= o. 50
= 0.75
Pb - Sb
-2 . 25
-2.50
Binary System
-2. 75
-3.0
0
-- -
0.66
1.0
!Pb + 1 sb
I'' I . lb .
C.B.ALCOCK
1/z
+
XA (yA~C)
B
~
1/z
.. (V)
Ye
yBA
46
AE
= &:lo(Ni)
- &:!Ni(Fe+Ni)
- &:lo(Fe) + &:!Fe(Fe+Ni)
z
wh re Z is the nearest neighbour co-ordination number throughout the
111nge of compositions. Approximating the excess free energy of each
lllnary system to the heat of mixing when we then have
1
YNi
0 YFe+Ni
Fe
- . log
Z
0
Ni
[
Ype Ype+Ni
Nnw i t would seem reasonable to use y~i for the binary OXYgen +
11 I c ke l system, in this expression for the exchange energy, at the
11! kel- rich end of the ternary system, and similarly the binary
rt)( ffic ient for J{!e at the iron-rich end of the system. Any
tit purt ure of the measured exchange energy in the ternary system from
Ch1LL calculated using binary systems data may be reasonably ascribed
I 11 Lhe activity coefficient involving the nickel at the iron-rich
11 11!1 and vice versa.
noth of the possibilities suggested above for accommodating the
data within the framework of chemical bond theory have
,,fiv Ious weaknesses. They show the fact that the theory in essence
l~1 i rLs a product of bond energies and co-ordination number which
. 111111ot be separated into its components from consideration of
I ht nnodynamic data alone.
1
~ porimental
'17
C.B. ALCOCK
sulfur in liquid metals and the heats of formation of the corresponding oxides and sulfides suggested by Richardson<e> has been
borne out by experiment. The following table demonstrates the
present state of knowledge for the oxygen solutions.
TABLE I
Solvent
-di
%0 2 cal.
Ag
7,300
2,700
Cu
40,000
9,900
Ni
Co
11 900
14 700( 9 )
Fe
63,500 (43,200)
28,000
Pb
52,400
28,500
Sn
68 , 400
43,800
Note :
191
his 'stability barri r' and b gi: to gath r knowl QdK nhcmt mo_t__ __,
11
C. B. ALCOCK
With respect to mass spectrometry, it cannot be claimed at the
moment that the technique is superior to the older gas equilibrium
except in two respects. Firstly the spectrometer is most conveniently
used in conjunction with the Knudsen cell in a high vacuum system.
This means that higher temperatures of operation, and therefore
greater dissociation pressures for a given system can be contemplated
than in gas-solid or gas-liquid equilibrium where the porosity of the
reaction tube often sets a limit to the temperature range. Secondly,
it is possible to measure the vapour pressure of one specie in the
presence of a number of other, and even higher, partial pressures.
This is a distinct advantage over the gas equilibrium technique and
means that when the technique of leaking controlled partial pressures
of gases into Knudsen cells< 12 > is firmly established , we may look
to an extension of our knowledge concerning dilute solutions of
sulfur in a number of metals, e.g. Ga, In, Zn .
The lower and upper limits of pressure measurement using the
Knudsen technique in the mass spectrometer seem to be about 10- 11
and 10- 4 atmos. The lower limit could be pushed down by another
order by individual ion counting techniques at the spectrometer
detector, but the upper limit is the practical limit of applicability
of the Knudsen condition of collision-free effusion. Higher partial
pressures might be handled by the use of heated capillary inlets to
the ion source of the spectrometer similar to the cold capillary
inlets at present used for permanent gases. The author is not aware
of any reports of such a technique being used at present, although
the measurement of partial pressure by capillary flow techniques is
by no means nove1< 13 >.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
I.
2.
ibid
I> .
o.
'I.
J.S . Ll.Leach.
II .
II.
G. R. Belton.
10 .
II .
Unpublished work.
Private communication.
Private communication.
I :i.
1:1.
Everett R.Johnson
Off ice of Standard Reference Data
National Bureau of Standards
In order to ensure that scientists and engineers might have
access to evaluated data, the Federal Council for Science and
'I' ohnology recommended to the Director of the President's Office of
t<' l1nce and Technology that a government-wide, co-ordinated, compre11 11 lve effort be established in the field of physical science.
l'tH pti ng this recommendation , Dr. Jerome Wiesner promulgated a
Ir 111 ral policy in June 1963, creating a National Standard Reference
llnl.1t System and assigning to the National Bureau of Standards the
11 111onsibility for its administration. The general objective of this
v t, m is to co-ordinate and integrate existing data compilation and
'v11luation activities into a systematic program, supplementing and
nm1di ng technical coverage when necessary, establishing and main1nI11 l ng standards for the output of the various groups, and providing
1111w h1tnisms for the dissemination of the output as required. The full
f 11xf. f the federal policy statement is given as Appendix A o this
1 p11rt and the press release announcing the establishment of the
NI ltll ' is given as Appendix B.
"l' LI mum
'l'h
EVERETT R.JOHNSON
groups of specialists for advice and for active assistance in
planning the program. The program is envisioned as permanent but
with ever-changing internal emphasis in the many fields of knowledge
as the requirements of the users of quantitative data change.
The assignment that was given to the National Bureau of Standards
by the Office of Science and Technology includes the following tasks:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
r '1
EVERETT R.JOHNSON
data have important applications and that the development of a comprehensive program for their compilation is worthy of serious
consideration.
Additional types of data not considered appropriate for systematic
activities in the System are those that relate to proprietary
materials, those that have validity for only a limited time, and
those that relate to materials which are of interest only for highly
specialized commercial purposes.
TYPES OF ACTIVITIES APPROPRIATE FOR NSRDS
The achievement of the objectives of the NSRDS require both the
compilation of 'standard reference data' and the 'processing' of
data - that is, gathering, sifting, and evaluating raw data and storina
retrieving, and disseminating evaluated data. For the compilation of
standard reference data, four types of activities are considered to
be approrriate in the program of the NSRDS:
1.
2.
3.
4.
1'h
I
IL< U.Ori 8 iS th
'T
EVERETT R.JOHNSON
the Office of the NSRDS at the National Bureau of Standards. This
responsibility involves the following steps, many of which are being
taken concurrently over an extended period of time. Each category
is to be further subdivided into areas of smaller scope, listing and
organizing in a logical fashion the subfields which in the opinion
of specialists comprise the broad category. In effect, this step
constitutes a definition of the field. No two scientists seem to
agree completely on the exact way in which this categorization should
be carried out nor even on the names of the broad subdivisions.
Certainly there is no uniquely ideal set of principles upon which to
base such a classification. For practical purposes the ideal of
unanimous agreement is not necessary; the goal is to obtain a system
which can help to identify the activities which should be undertaken,
to indicate the completeness of coverage of the various fields of
science, and to judge the development of program activities from
year to year.
Another step in the development of the program is a survey of the
operations of e!isting data compilation and evaluation groups. This
survey is to determine the technical scope covered, the nature of
the output. the number and types of staff required, the financial
arrangements, plans for the future, and any other relevant
information.
Still another essential feature of the program is a determination
of the needs of the technical community for activities of the type
appropriate to the NSRDS. A great deal of information has been
obtained during the survey of existing groups now under way.
Additional information is obtained by consultation with individual
specialists who use the data, with representatives of industrial and '
professional organizations Xe.g. the Manufacturing Chemists'
Association, The American Society for Testing and Materials, etc.),
with committees of the National Academy of Sciences-National Research
Council, with program office~~ in other government agencies, and with
any other sources -ehat seem appropriate.
As a result of the surveys and consultations a list of desirable
activities can be prepared, with a priority assigned to each. No
attempt will be made to develop a detailed scale of priorities;
perhaps three levels at -most will be quite sufficient. The area
program leaders at the Nationa~ Burea of Standards hav th
EVERETT R.JOHNSON
United States is being sought for these panels. They will be asked
to make significant contributions during all of the planning and
implementation of the program - to the definition of the area, to
the appraisal of existing activities, to the assessment of priorities,
to the recruitment of individuals and groups for specific data
compilation and evaluation activities, to the evaluation of the
technical output of the various groups under the cognizance of the
NSRDS, and to any other tasks to which they are prepared to contribute.
The recommendations of these panels will be perhaps the most
important factor in the operational decisions made in the NSRDS.
In addition to seeking the aid of the panels of consultants just
described, it is planned to confer at intervals with advisory
committees established under the auspices of the National Academy of
Sciences-National Research Council . Arrangements have been made
with the Office of Critical Tables of the NAS-NRC to provide both
the channel of communication with these advisory committees and also
advice on the over- all operation of the NSRDS. In their fields of
specialization, the NAS-NRC committees will be requested to discuss
the general and specific problems encountered in the NSRDS , to
review and criticize the NSRDS program, and in general to serve as a
means of keeping the activities of the NSRDS in tune with the needs
of the technical community.
(j()
0I
EVERETT R.JOHNSON
The word 'product' has been used in the preceding paragraph
because of its broad, all-inclusive connotations. This word is
intended to imply that many physical forms are considered appropriate
for recording the results of compilation and evaluation activities.
The product may be a separate monograph with a hard cover or a paper
cover; it may be a critical review published in a recognized journal;
it may be a set of IBM or other data-processing cards; it may be a
computer tape or a computer print-out. In short, the product may
take any form that the users of the data find to be most convenient .
.In the planning of the detailed program, considerable study is
being given to the nature of the services to be provided by the
'Information Services Operation' of the Off ice of Standard Reference
Data at the National Bureau of Standards. The guiding principles
for the introduction of a service are that it shall be of value to
the technical community and that it shall be concerned with compilations of evaluated data. The initial planning envisions the following
activities. The data in storage will consist of a complete collection
of the world output of 'standard reference data', regardless of place
of origin or physical form, appropriately indexed and stored for
rapid retrieval. The file and compilations shall be accessible to
all qualified persons who wish to use them, and information on their
contents shall be made readily available to the technical community.
An editorial and publication service shall be operated which will
have the capability of turning the raw output from a data compilation
group into a finished product, whether it be a monograph, a deck of
IBM cards, a computer tape, or something else.
BUDGETARY PLANS
The funds made available to the NSRDP are to be used for new and
supplementary activities of the standard reference data type.
Financial responsibility for existing activities now under the
sponsorship of other agencies will not be assumed by the NSRDP except in unusual CiPcumstances~ and certainly not1until the most .
urgent needs for new projects have been satisfied. It has already
become apparent during the earliest stages of establishment of the
NSRDS that this point must be reiterated often. The program at NBS
is not intended to supplant existing activities and sources of
financial support but ta augment them.
(I'
APPENDIX A
n I
f1J11
EVERE.Tl' R.JOHNSON
Standard Reference Data Center (NSRDC) at the National Bureau of
Standards and such other Standard Reference Data Centers as may be
required.
The National Bureau of Standards will be charged with the
administration of the National Standard Reference Data System. This
assignment will include the establishment of standards of quality,
methodology including machine processing formats, and such other
functions as are required to ensure the compatibility of all units
of the NSRDS.
The National Bureau of Standards will be charged with funding and
administering the National Standard Reference Data Center. This
Center will be an identifiable part of the National Scientific and
Technical Information System (NSTIS).
Standard Reference Data Centers covering certain specific areas
of effort may be established by or be assigned to the various
Departments and Agencies in accordance with their specific desires
and capabilities. Such Centers will be financed and administered
by the Department to which assigned but will meet the quality
standards and other requirements of the NSRDS. Such Centers will be
included as identifiable components of the NSTIS.
The NSRDS may also include Standard Reference Data Centers at
universities, research institutes, and other appropriate nonGovernment activities. To be included in the NSRDS, such Centers
will meet the quality standards and other requirements of the NSRDS
and will be included as identifiable components of the NSTIS.
There will be an Advisory Board to review and recommend policy
relative to the operation of the NSRDS. It will include among
others, representation from the National Academy of Sciences ,
National Science Foundation, Fed ~ ral Agencies engaged in research
and development. and Such other ' representatives of the scientific~
and technical community as the Director of the National Bureau of
Standards may determine .
In establishing the NSRDS, the intent is to provide an articulat ed
system of Centers and acti~ities under -such co- ordi nat i on and
di r ect i on as to ensure an output meeting quality standards for
(Jtl
APPENDIX B
Office of Science and Technology
Executive Office of the President
7 June 1963
Dr.Jerome B. Wiesner, Director of the Office of Science and
'I' chnology in the Executive Office of the President, today announced
11r
EVERETT R. JOHNSON
has been the now almost totally out-dated International Critical
Tables, an eight-volume publication last issued in 1933. That data
source was compiled under the auspices of the National Academy of
Sciences, Office of Critical Tables, and published by the McGraw-Hill
Book Company.
Under the new system the National Academy of Sciences will act as
advisor to the National Bureau of Standards, providing the guidelines
to the fields of science and technology having greatest demand for
data.
In recent years the mass of available data resulting from the
stepped-up Federal research and development programs, has become
much too large to be handled by a private publishing venture. Also,
the flow of new data requires continuing efforts to update collections.
Only a national system is able to cope with this information flow.
Under the plan for the new system, the data will be published in
much smaller collections than in the old International Critical
Tables. In this form, the data will be more responsive to the
dynamics of modern research and development.
Detailed plans for the system components are presently being
developed by the several participating agencies and the National
Academy of Sciences. One set of these plans will be the the subject
of an all-day meeting on June 20, 1963, sponsored by the Office of
Critical Tables, National Academy of Sciences.
...
'
(HJ
PANEL I
DISCUSSION
Ur.Rossini - We will now proceed to our intra-panel discussion, and
[ wi ll invite our panelists to make comments on any matters which
have been so far recorded.
!Ir. Chipman - Why don't I start it off by making a comment on somehing Dr.Johnson said. There's a little story going about our
A r onautics Information Office. There was a man who went to a
11 ychi atrist. He said, "Doctor, I'm afraid I'm losing my mind. I
<;o.n' t remember anything. I can't remember what I did last night.
r can't remember what I had for breakfast this morning. I can't
r member whether I kissed my wife when I left home. In fact, I
< 1tn' t remember leaving home.
What can I do?" The Doctor said,
rhis is pretty serious. How long has this been going on?" The
1110.n said, "How long has what been going on?"
llr. nossini - That's a pretty good start John.
lit'. Hult gren - I don't think we' re far enough along to answer that
11111 Hti on. The metallic chemical bond is much more complex than the
111111 - metallic bonds, because it involves a resonance that is very
I111portant and not much understood. We can calculate bond energies
I 11 tl great extent in organic compounds. For instance the bond
11111rgies. are generally additive except in recognized cases, and we
' 1111 alculate the properties quite well for many organic compounds
Ii I t;h have never been made. However, I don't think we' re far
111111gh along in metallic systems to do very much on this. Maybe
Ill' . Al ock will disagree.
111 /\I cock_ - No, I'm not going to disagree, but I was merely going
11 1 Lh
11111 1111H
- I
l!ll!' f.ll ,
07
I.
PANEL I
Dr.Alcock - If I could speak as a one-time extractive metallurgist,
I think that there are many problems in this field to which we can
get approximate solutions, and the thermodynamic content of these
problems largely revolves around heats of mixing. There are many
examples in the industrial applications of thermodynamics where we
can be satisfied with a modest degree of accuracy. Of course, when
one considers atomic model building for solution theory, then the
more accurate data are vital, but here again I suppose it is prudent
not to pursue accuFacy too far, because the more accurate data one
gets, the more embarrassing it becomes to try to fit them to a model.
Dr.Hultgren - This brings up a real war between the scientifically
minded and the engineering minded person. A scientifically minded
person wants to pick out something he can measure accurately and he
avoids everything else, and concentrates on this. The engineers
problem presented here is something we've got to do and ask if you
have any data? If not, a guess comes forth and is used. If it is
correct within the factor of four, maybe it's all right. So
everyone has to choose whether he shall interpret a lot of guesses,
or shall wait for more accurate experimental data. In our books we
stuck to purity. But, you certainly have to have the guessing. But
often these things get mixed up. We just measured some heat contents
of germanium the importance of which no one would deny, and it
develops that there are tables on the heat contents of germanium
which were once originated in an idle afternoon by Dr.Kelley because
someone wanted a guess. Those have been copied and copied. I just
made the statement that if you copy a thing three times it's true.
Our measured values are considerably different, and Dr.Kelley is more
amused at this than anyone else.
Dr.Rossini - Any other comments?
Dr.Kubaschewski - I agree with Ralph Hultgren, and this conference
is concerned with the ApplicationI of Thermodynamic Data and Principles
to Practical Problems. ~ I've dealt with quite a few such practical
problems, and I don't think there was a single case when I had all
the data I needed of sufficient accuracy. Mostly, 'half of them I
have not. So, we have to supply quite a lot of guess work, and I
think it is very important for a thermochemist to have experience in
estimating data. This intFoduces, of course, substantial errors in
the calculations, but this is acc~ptable as long as the final answer
OU
DISCUSSION
18 given with a value. Even if this is large, it is better than
not hing. Now, the ternary systems which have been discussed today
I 11 particular by Dr.' s Chipman and Alcock, are examples. We usually
11 og lect the inter-action between the metal and oxygen or another
11 n-metal in a solvent metal, and we get quite good results because
I.he two effects partly compensate each other. For instance , you
q 1m calculate the solubility of alumina in nickel, or iron, and get
wlthin 50% of the correct answer. But when you are working at a
I( ve l of . 002 per cent,. this is completely sufficient and no
1u1alysis can do better than that. I can't think of any further
11xamp les at the moment, but there are many of them. Of course ,
w1' ve got to pursue the accurate measurements, and as I've said
IH fo r e, we must find simplified rules such as are indicated in these
l.u.lks. But the problem still remains that we've got to supply data
11 11 t of the blue.
Sometimes we are really impudent, and mostly, of
1ourse, we are inaccurate, but not so inaccurate that it isn't
worthwhile.
!Jr.Rossini - Thank you. I think we might turn now to some of the
1J11 s t ions from the audience. E.W. Dewing of Aluminium Laboratories,
1,1.d. asks Dr. Hultgren: By what percentage did your new heat
<'I LPac i ty values fo r silver a11d zinc differ froln the old ones based
1111 heat contents?
111. llultg ren
PANEL I
Dr.Chipman - Can you express the pre-melting effect in terms of
In practice
with samples that are not too pure, there is quite a large effect,
but with absolutely pure samples, we are not sure. There is, we
think, a small effect, but not nearly as much as is measured
ordinarily.
Dr.Chipman - Do you include anything about pre-melting, or whether
heat value.
Dr.Hultgren - This is included in the latent heat, . because you must
effect cover?
Dr.Hultgren - A couple of hundred degrees sometimes.
It is quite
large.
I
magnetic transformation of iron, you usually condense the corresponding heat of transformation to one temperature, otherwise, you
would have calculations of great length.
Dr.Hultgren - Dr.Kelley has done that. I don't think that's right.
-Our tabulation, of course, gives the whole curv
Th
cond ordor
70
DISCUSSION
r eaction takes place over many hundreds of degrees; melting is
supposed to be a first order reaction.
Dr.Chipman - Dr.Kubaschewski has suggested that this is immaterial
with increasing temperature and then come back to near the melting
poin t , would you get a different curve?
llr. Hul tgren - No, it reproduces, and we did this not by drop
1;alo rimetry but we set up our liquid metal in a crucible and dropped
c ld metal into it, whose heat content we knew. That gave us our
noolirig effect . We know that heat absorbed by the cold metal, and
wo divi de that by the temperature drop to find the heat capacity.
We can go up and down in temperature and reproduce the measurements .
I hope we ' 11 have these experiments published within a year.
llr. Rossi ni - One final question from J. W. Linhart of Ohio Steel
l'nundries to Dr.Hultgren has to do with the classification as satisl 1i Lory or unsatisfactory of data of the elements .
The question is:
\\\t111L
t he difference in accuracy approximately?
Well , a lot of unsatisfactory data is sheer guess.
n.t t h on tr~py of melting as 2. 3 and multiplies by the
1-11~<
HHOA
'1 1
PANEL I
temperature of melting, and that is the heat of fusion. Then it is
guessed that the liquid will have the same heat capaci ty as the
solid at the melting point, and that the heat capacity is constant
with temperature ; so it is very hard to say what you think is the
per cent accuracy. The specific heat may be off by 20% at least.
With the heat contents , of course, the percentage accuracy looks
much better, and I can' t tell you what the answer would be.
Dr.Rossini - This is a question from Dr.Wallace of the University
of Pittsburgh for Dr.Kubaschewski regarding the chromium, molybdenum
and chromium- iron systems. How do the measured~ S's correspond
with ~ S for random mixing?
Dr. Kubaschewski - Very poorly. Actually, for us, this is sort of a
disaster. We' ve always calculated or assumed for many years that
alloy systems with complete mutual solubility and activity not
deviating too much from Raoult would be. essentially regular . We
first measured the free energies of chromium-molybdenum, chromiumiron and other systems and assumed that to use excess free energies
in place of the heats would be quite sufficient. When we actually
measured the heats, we found we had substantial excess entropies,
the maximum being of the order of one entropy unit , plus , or half
an entropy unit minus. We suspected our measurements and checked
them again and we compared the .results with those of others who used
independent methods , and we have now resigned ourselves that at
least in the transition metal systems there are considerable heats
and excess entropies . With the phase diagram calculations , this is
not necessarily too much of a drawback as long as the calculation
is not too far away from the temperature of measurement, and in
this sense the method is rather fool-proof at least for superficial
calculations.
Dr. Hultgren - I could add a little, too, for non-transition metals .
In the liquid alloys in our book 1 , we went through those that we
thought had a reasonabf y good entropy determination. We plotted
those entropies of formation and they vary as Dr.Kubaschewski said,
from one unit less than ideal to one unit entropy more than ideal;
more or less uniformly scattered. One could say the ideal entropy
was the average of them all, but it certainly was not a Boltzman
di stribution about the average . It' s rat her un ifo rm excess entropy
varyi ng from pl us on and mi nus on~.
7''
DISCUSSION
Dr.Rossini - Dr.Wallace also asks Dr.Kubaschewski about the same
systems. The presumption is that the A H's and A S's were measured
at a fixed temperature or over a restricted range of temperature.
The question is: How are values obtained for the A H's and AS' s
needed at these temperatures? Was A Cp assumed equal to zero?
Dr.Kubaschewski - Yes, that is true. I admit the fact that if AH
and A sxs are finite you will also find a non-zero A Cp. This
correction is relatively small, and if it amounts to say 2 calories
per degree, it will not affect our calculations unduly, if we don't
go away too far from the actual temperature of measurements. But I
agree that for really good assessments we should also measure the
A Cp' s.
Dr.Rossini - Thank you. This is a question for .Dr.Chipman. In your
correlation of interaction coefficients, what can be done to estimate
the values for other unmeasured elements in a series? Mr.M.Parkman
of Aerojet General wants to know.
Dr.Chipman - There have been a number of things done about this. If
you read some of Schenck's papers in the last few years, you will
ind rather elaborate systems of estimating the inter-action
oefficient for various elements on nitrogen in iron, both solid
ond liquid iron. A plot of the inter-action coefficient against the
utomic number of alloying element gives regular periodic variations
li ke many other periodic functions, and with enough spots identified
by experiment, one can estimate the others by drawing this sort of
urve. This is about the only recourse we have in estimating, where
the re is no measurement.
fir.Ros sini - Thank you. This is a question for Dr.Johnson. The
~1nes tion is for the program you described.
Why are ceramics
1 liminated since many of these systems are well definable?
~ IL , L.i ttlewood of the Steel Co. of Canada asked.
Ill'. Johnson - We have eliminated the tabulation of mechanical
11tlcu lations of ceramics because unless one has a knowledge of the
u1I ro-st ructure for the particular measurement, the measurement
ll.11 lf is not of, say, standard reference data. That is, one manurr 'turer will produce the so-called same ceramic material, and yet
11111( htmi al m asurements on this ceramic, for instance, would vary
lll)l) I' illbly,
73
PANEL I
Dr.Chipman - You can, Dr.Johnson, on the same basis eliminate tabu-
_ _ __
DISCUSSION
Some of these now actually are rece1v1ng some support from the
program that Dr.Johnson has mentioned. This Office of Critical
Tables that we have in our country serves as the agency through the
Nati onal Academy of Sciences whereby we can join with efforts on
data in other countries.
A movement is under way at the present time to have the International Council of Scientific Unions! which encompasses all the
Sc ientific Unions of the world. to consider broadly this important
problem of critical tables and standard reference data. We hope
that there will be established in each country something corresponding to the Office of Critical Tables and the National Standard
Reference Data Program. Then through this International Council of
Sc ientific Unions some mechanism may be set up to co-ordinate the
fforts in the various countries, because clearly there is so much
to do that it would be most unfortunate if there were any serious
dup lication. Most of all, we want to bring to light the knowledge
of all the work that is going on.
In closing I. would like to say that I think all of you will agree
ihat our first session this morning may be declared successful
b cause I think we have raised more questions than we have answered.
'l'h is problem of making thermodynamic data available is a world-wide
one. Work needs to be done in each country, with some appropriate
International organization to co-ordinate the work and to arrange
I' r unnecessary duplication of effort. I think we can see that for
ttuanti tati ve information of the kind which we are discussing, the
llltire communication process may be thought of as occurring in
rour steps:
1)
2)
:l)
11) LIH
PANEL I
I think we may say that the aim of our system of communication in
science must be to make the proper information available to the user,
quickly and efficiently.
Now, in closing this session, I want to extend on behalf of
Dr.Fitterer and the management of the Symposium, thanks to all of
the panelists of our first session for their reports and discussion,
and to the audience for patient listening and active participation
through their questions.
,J
70
PANEL II
APPLICATIONS OF THERMODYNAMIC PRINCIPLES
TO METALLURGICAL SYSTEMS
Chairman
1.
2.
3.
4.
f?.
fl .
Disc ussion
Tl
PANEL I I
Dr.Wallace
Ladies and Gentlemen, I am very happy to welcome you to the
second session of the Conference devoted to the Application of
Fundamental Thermodynamics to Metallurgical Processes.
It was rather in the nature of things that the distinguished group
of panelists that we had this morning were forced to accentuate the
negative. They, in this aspect, performed, I think, quite a useful
function, but there is going to be a change of pace, I hope this
afternoon. The equally distinguished group of panelists that we
have here this afternoon and which I have the privilege to introduce
to you will have a better chance to accentuate the positive. They
will be telling us of the applicability of the thermodynamic
principles to certain metallurgical problems. The first paper this
afternoon is by Dr.G.W.Mellors and Dr.Senderoff of the Parma Research
Laboratories of the Union Carbide Company .. It's entitled 'Electrode
Reactions in the Electrolysis of Fused Salts.' The paper will be
presented by Dr.Senderoff.
711
ELECTRODE REACTIONS IN
THE ELECTROLYSIS OF FUSED SALTS
by
INTRODUCTION
It has .been found that of the nine refractory metals of Groups
IVB, VB and VIB, all but titanium can be electrodeposited in the
form of coherent, dense pore-free deposits on a large number of
electrically conducting substrates from electrolytes consisting of
molten fluoride mixtures ( 1). The appl'tcation to electrocladding
with tantalum, or molybdenum, for example for corrosion or wear
resistance. is obvious. Also, the substrate may be removed and a freestanding electroformed object may be produced. In addition,
consolidation by electrorefining is in some cases a more economical
techR ique than the usual powder metallurgy procedures and frequently
produces a product of superior propePties. Electrorefining, both
instead of, and in addition to, electron beam melting have provided
extremely pure metals for electrical and other applications which
could not be produced in any other way, Finally, electrowinning of
these metals may be accomplished by this process. It has been of
consideraqle interest, therefore, to study the thermodynamics of the
lectrode reactions of these systems.
The study of the thermodynamics of fused salt systems has been
uccomplished by the usual thermodynamic techniques such as vapor
pressure measurements, cryoscopy, mass spectrometry, and particularly
ff ectively by static EMF measurement of .reversible cells. However,
t he corrosive nature of molten flu9rides have rendered these methods
very difficult and in many cases unworkable. This factor, together
with the ambiguities generated by questions of reversibility and
tdentity of the reactions encountered with the polyvalent transition
ni tal ions, have in some cases proved pitfalls for the unwary. For
Lhose reasons it was decided to seek the thermodynamic information
l'r m the st udy of electrochemical transients, a type of experiment
wh Loh. hnti bo n ui:1od for studying electrochemical kinetics more than
l'or
h l'lnodyn11111I H.
Ill
-1.3
~ -I.I
...J
>-0.9
_...,. / :
i--
.r
/
~
0.2 SEC
-OJ It
0
Fig.1.
l'Hibl
to
'Iii:
..
~7T1/2 Fnol/2
(1)
~=n2 +2n2
n 2
(3)
EXPERIMENTAL
'
Solvent Preparation
The eutectic mixture LiF-NaF-KF* (46.5-11.5-42 mole per cent,
M.P. 454 C) was used as t~e solvent electrolyte. Approximat e ly
Referred.to as 'Flinak' .
1~~{~"'
/-
Fig.2.
Chronopotentiomettic Cell
G. Steel flange
H. Water-cooled stainless steel can
Vacuum gauge
I. Steel flange
Vacuum or gas inlet line
Gas exit bubbler tip
J. St ee 1 flange
Steel Flange
. ~ Hastelloy X can
Plexiglas cover di sk
B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
Cell Components
The chronopotentiometric apparatus is depicted in Fig.3. Containers for the test melt wer e molybdenum cups (I ). 6 cm wi de by 4
i n deep , No.Q14792-A from the Fa ~ t el M tall ur gical Corporation.
l Lr d npH (C) . w n mo.de l)y Mr1 ng out 1" l n ths.
~
IHI
11 1
1 111>
E
-Ht-- - F
IHl1t-W--- - G
~-illiiilil!l~-- H
c- -- -
Fig.3.
F. Counter electrode
G. Thermowell
H. Indicator electrode
I. Crucible (nickel or molybdenum)
for electrolyte under study
J. Nickel cradle
Insulation Problems
The use of a metal electrolysis can in conjunction with metal
ontainers for both the reference electrode and test melt led to
i;orious e1ectrical insulation problems. In the first few experiments
t ns rilation was attempted through the use of recrystallized alumina
ror' base supports, but at 700-800C this refractory acquired
1tppreCiable conductivity in the presence of the vapors of the
fluor ides and led to electrical leaks from the anode through the
t st melt container to the grounded metal electrolysis can giving
11se to' abnormally long transition times. The only effective means
or 1 trt nl jHol atjon has b n to upport all of the cell
I
117
Ill>
0.08
...
!:~
0 .0<
0 .04
'
~
~, 0.0 2
CONC.
Fig.4.
10
no
-2.0
-1.5
V>
f-
,.
-
-LO
>
-0.5
0.05 SEC
Fig.5.
83.
-1.0
(/)
I...J
>
-0.8
-0.6
=~
---
I SEC
'
-0.4
r---
-- '
0
1'11(. 6.
. Ill
PRECISION OF DATA
Cone.
K2TaF 7
C.D.
(moles cm- 3 ) (amp/cm 2)
x 10 5
Min. Max.
2.0
3.0
4.0
4.4
4.5
5.9
5.9
7.0
8.0
9.6
0. 056
0. 075
0.065
0.092
0.092
0.050
0. 045
0.050
0.061
0.113
0.110
o. 230
0.115
0.142
0.158
0.250
0. 246
0.180
0.240
0. 151
Overall Average
iT 1/2
No.
[El] 1/4
[E2] 1/4
1
(amp sec 112cm- 2) of
(Volt)
(Volt)
Avg. std.Dev. Avg. Std.Dev.
Avg. Std.Dev. Runs
1. 06
1.05
1.08
0.025
0. 024
0.056
0. 025
o. 033
1. 24
1. 28
1. 29
1. 34
0.057
0.031
0.052
0.040
0.022
o. 97
0. 038
1.18
0.020
0.97
1.07
0.052
0. 017
1.18
1. 31
0.064
0.021
1. 04
1. 02
1. 03
0.054
03
1. 24
1. 26
0.060
0. 020
0.031
0.045
0.060
0.057
0.071
0.081
0. 093
0.0025
0. 0029
0.0015
10
11
11
0.0015
0.0028
0. 0030
0.0024
0.0036
3
4
5
11
12
7
7
iT 1/2/C
1
(amp sec 112cm mole- 1)
x 10- 3
Avg.
Std.Dev.
1. 01
0.05
Cone.
1 2 /T
1
(mole cm- 3)Avg. Std.Dev.
2. oxrn- 5 2.9
3.0
2.3
4.0
0.91
5.9
1. 5
8.0
2.1
1. 1
0.8
0. 07
0.02
0.02
Overall
Average
0. 7
1. 8
iT 1/2
No.
2
i1 2 1 1 2;c
of
(amp sec 112cm- 2)
1
2
1
(amp
sec
l
cm
mole)
Runs
Avg. Std.Dev.
.036
.044
. 044
. 068
. 118
.010
.005
.006
.013
.052
1. 80
1. 47
1.10
1.15
1. 47
TABLE III
...
T2/ 1 1
Ill
n2
0.56
1. 8,
5.3
24.0
4
3
2
1
2
3
4
'
9
5
11
11
0.7,
f(t) LOG (T
112
-t
0
-0.4
-0.8
-1.2
-1.6
1.05
1.00
1.10
VOLTS
Fig.7.
..
1)(1
....... ~
(/)
~ - 1.0
0
> - 0 .5
_v
Fig.8.
--0.05 SEC
fin
0.5SEC
1--
-1.5
~ -1.0
g-o.5
0
II
7 l
:,.- i-- ~
...J
A. First Step of
Niobium Reduction
Fig.9.
0.5 SEC
I'\
B. Second Step of
Niobium Reduction
Cathodic-Anodic Chronopotentiogram
-2.0
(/)
.....
-1.5
-1.0
..J
> -0.5
j.
--
0.05SEC
Fig.10.
100
TABLE IV
EMF Series for Transition Metal Ions in Molten
NaF-KF-LiF Eutectic Mixture at 1023K
- 1. 5
_, Ta 0
- 1. 26
cr 0
_, TaII
- 1. 13 *
- 1. 03
- 1. 03
-+
_, Nb 0
Nb IV _, Nb 1
- 0.754
crIII _, crII
- 0.69
Fe II
_, Fe 0
- 0.512
Fe III _, FeII
NbV _, NbIV
Ni II
_,Ni
- 0.21
- 0.11
- 0
101
...
10 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11 .
IO:J
Abstract
1Oh
(2)
[cJ [o]
K
[A] [BJ
(3)
Very often the square bracket terms are equated t o the analyti cal
concentrations of the various species but from the thermodynamic
vi ewpoint, with which we are now conce rned, the square brackets refer
to the effective chemica l concentrations, i.e. the activities of the
species. Equation (3) should therefore be re - written as
K
(3a)
(4)
The standard free energy change, L F0 , for the reaction can also be
xpressed in another form. If the reaction in (2) is considered to
b the basis of a perfectly reversible electrochemical cell then tlte
maximum net work obtainable from it is n.E . F. where n is the number
of Faradays passing through the cell to complete the reaction, E is
t. he potential of the cell in volts and F is the Faraday (96, 487
oulombs). This maximum net work must equal the standard free energy
hange of the reaction, hence
-.Cw0 = n.F. E.
(5)
'l'huH alt hough t he ext ent t o which a reaction will proceed is given
d r ctly by t h equ ili brium constant K there are three
1 t111 I v 1t l 11t ways in wh i h this tendency to completion can be assigned
1 11 ll1 1H~1 nl va.lu, lh H ar
i nt rr lat d by
10 7
11101-1L.
-n.E. 23,060
2. 303 RT log 10 K
(6)
It will be seen later that the most widely used reducing gas for
precipitating metals from solutions is hydrogen. For this reason
most attention will be given to the thermodynamics of the general
reaction
n
Men+ + - H
2
Me + n.H+
(7)
M1;1.n+ + n. e. 1
Potential = EMe
f7a~
Potential = E
(7b)
H2
Clearly if EMe exceeds ~H 2 then the metal will liberate hydrogen fro m
water and pass into solutlon but if EH 2 exceeds EMe the hydrogen wil l
108
Eo
,H2
2.303 RT
F
log 10 ~+
(Sa)
loglOaMen+
(Sb)
and
EMe
(i)
= EoMe
2.303 RT
n.F
The potential of the hydrogen electrode is governed by the concent ration of hydrogen ions and hydrogen molecules in solution in contact
wi th the electrode and is therefore a function of both pH and hydrogen
gas pressure. Equation (Sa) ,should therefore be re-written as
~2
= EoH2 -
2. 303 RT
2. 303 RT
x
. log1o'ii+ +
. loglOPH
F
2F
2
(Sc)
= 0. 05916
pH +- 0.0295S loglOPH
(Sd)
H<J l ut
100
By definition
where fMen+ is the activity coefficient of the ion Men+ and [Mell+]
is the analytical concentration of the ion. Hence at 25C.
EoMen+ -
0. 05916
n
. loglO [Men+] -
0.05916
n
TABLE I
Activity Coefficients in Some Metal Salt Solutions
Activity Coefficients in solutions of molality
Salt
0.001
MgS04
0.002 0.005
0.01 o. 02 0.05
o. 1
0.40 0.32
Niso 4
cuso 4 0.74
znso 4 o. 70
o.1f
o. 41 0.31 0. 21
0. 61
0.48
0.39
MgC1 2
FeC1 2 0.89
CuC1 2 0.89
ZnC1 2 0.88
0.86
0. 85
0.84
0.80
0.78
0.77
0.75
0. 72
0. 71
,,-
0.22
0.2
- 0. 56 0.53
0.70 0.62 0.58 0.55
0.66 o. 58 0. 52 0. 47
0. 64 0.56 0. 50 0. 45
110
0.5
1. 0
0.52 0.62
0.59 . 0.67
0. 42 0.43
o. ::!8 0.33
= Eo
Me
_ 2 .. 303 RT
l
2
. og100.05
(9)
The value of EMen+ clearly depends upon the value taken for the
standard electrode potential and in all that follows the values of
E0 Men+ will be those quoted by Latimer 4 except for those of Ni++
and co++. The standard electrode potentials used by Schaufelberger 1
were also those of Latimer except for Ni++ and co++. But whereas
Schaufelberger 1 used the values of Haring 5 6 for NiT+ and co++ the
present discussion uses the values for Ni++ and co++ taken from the
National Bureau of Standards circular 'Selected Values of Chemical
Thermodynamic Properties' . The values of these potentials for
comparison are;
Haring
N.B.S.
Latimer
Ni/Ni++
Co/co++
0. 231 volt
0.241
0.250
0.278 volt
0.267
0.277
In Figure 1 the hydrogen potential at 25C and 1 and 100 Atmospheres is plotted against pH while the potential ordinates are also
used to plot the values of EMen+ in 1. O x 10 3 molal solutions.
' This figure is essentially the same as that used by Schaufelberger 1
hut differs from it in that the metal potential values have been
culculated taking activities into account. Because these corrections
tuw a much larger effect in 1. O molal solutions the slopes of the
r1:M 0 n+ iines from 1. O to 1. O x 10 3 molal are much flatter than
1uctt ated by Schaufelberger.
111
l0.11 10 r.ilolol
l OMol I
+ 10
!----------------------------<
.,,_
..I
0
~o
...;::
..I
=Ci------------------------1c.,++
0
Q.
-10+--r--.------,.------.---.----.---r--r---r---.--....----.---'
10
12
4
Fig.1.
pH-
E Me -
0.05916
loglO~en+
( 11)
n. pH - - - - -
0.05916
Ion
zn++
Fe++
Cd++
co++
Ni~ +
cu++
Ag++
Eo
.0.762
0.440
0.403
o..r267
0.241
-0.337
-0.799
10 2 Molar
pH
13.9
8.5
7.8
5.5
5. 1
-4.7
-11. 5
-'_ _ ____,
(1-x)
x + n.x
Hence
E0 Me
0. 05916
-
u.nd
EH
re
0. 05916
M
. log 10 [1-x]
0.04916 log 10 nx
11
(12)
+ 0.241, n
Hence
0.241 - 0.02958 loglO (1-X)
Q.241
0.02958
..
8. 15
10 8 x 1. 41
.. 5.64x10 8
0. 05916 log 10 . 2x
(1-x)
loglO - 4x2
log 10 P
1-x
4x 2
x 2 +x-1= 0,
.. x=4.21x10- 5
3 x
11 7
x.NH 3 + Ni++
TABLE 3
Potentials f or the Nickel Ammines
E0 Ni "' 0. 241 v. 10
Equilibrium Constantll
..=
2.80
Log10K1
K2 = 2. 24
..
..
..
,,
..
XEoNi
'
1Eo
Ni =0.324v.
2EoNi
3Eo
Ni
4Eo .
N1
5EONi
K3 = 1. 73
K4 = 1..19
0.75
K5
0. 03
K5
F. N I
1111
0.390 v .
0. 441
0. 477
0. 499
0. 490
v.
v.
v.
v.
Where aammine represents the activity of the ammine [Ni(NH 3)x]++ and
~H 3 represents the activity of ammonia in solution. Since no activity
oefficient data are available for the nickel ammines the usual
1Lpproximation of substituting concentrations for activities must be
made and hence
[Ni (NH 3) x] ++
ENi = E0 Ni - 0.02958 log 10
Fig.2.
Potential of Ni++ - NH 3
TA BLE 4
Concentrations and Potentials for the Ni/NH3 System at 25c
Total Nickel Concentration = 1. 0 Molal
NH 3/.Ni
Rat io
:-'"
0
o. 064.
0. 184
0. 50
1. 12
1. 50
1. 99
2. 52
2. 97
3. 56
4.01
4. 73
5. 02
6.22
15 . 91
Ammine Concentrations
Ni++
0. 940
0. 826
0. 573
0.233
0.166
0.040
0.010
0. 002
0
Potential
..0. 059
o. 165
o. 361
0.466
0.393
0.251
0.115
0.047
0. 011
0.003
0
.
I
0. 001
0.009
0.063
0.256
0.372
0. 437
0.375
0. 258
0. 114
0.050
0. 009
0.003
0
0
0
0. 003
0.043
o. 109
0.234
0.379
0.438
0. 379
0. 270
0.108
0.057
0. 006
0
0
0.009
0.036
0. 110
0.215
0. 362
0. 418
0.356
0.278
0.092
0. 001
0
0. 002
0. 012
0.038
o. 126
0.235
0.429
0.494
0.461
0.085
0
0.001
0. 008
0.025
0. 099
0. 168
0.440
0. 913
XENi
0.242
0.242
0.248
0.260
0. 269
0.282
0.300
o. 318
0.346
0. 370
0. 411
0.460
0.497
0. 517
D'
~
~
;<:
~
~
~
H
concentration of each
and from these results
a 1 molal nickel
are tabulated in Table
Figure 2 also shows the hydrogen potential line, this being der ived from the observed pH of ammoniacal nickel solutions. From
t his figure it is clear that the greatest driving force for the
r eduction occurs at about an ammonia/nickel ratio of 2. 0 - 2. 5.
Thi s is in agreement with the findings of Wadsworth 12 that in the
hydrogen reduction of cobaltous sulphate solutions the maximum rate
of reduction occurs at a ratio of NH 3/co = 2, it is also the ratio
f N~ 3 /Nichosen in commercial hydrometallurgy.
Bjerrum has also determined the equilibrium constants for the
ca++ - NH 3 system and the same calculations of the change of metal
potential with ammonia/metal ratio have been carried out and tabulated
t n Tables 5 and 6. These results are very similar to those for the
Ni ++ - NH 3 system.
TABLE 5
Potentials for Cobaltous Ammines
E0 Co = 0. 267 v. lO
XEO
Equilibrium Constant
log 10K1
2.11
K2
.
,,
.
K3
K4
,,
Ks
,,
K6
lEo
Co
0.329 v.
1. 63
Co
2Eo Co
0.378 v.
1. 05
3Eo
Co
0.409 v.
0.76
4Eo
Co
0.431 v.
0.18
5Eo
Co = 0.436 v.
6Eoco = o. 418 v.
-0.62
Ll
TABLE 6
Concentrations and Potentials for the Co/NH 3 System at 25C
Total Copalt Concentration = 1. 0 Molal
NH 3/Co
Ratio
.....
~
t-:1
0.124
0.509
0.901
1. 520
2.571
2.879
3.643
3. 687
4.429
4.998
5. 288
5. 663
7 .042
8.428
10.466
.
co++
0.882
0.575
0.345
0.126
0.013
0.006
0.001
0.001
0
Ammine Concentration
Co(NH )++
3
0.113
" 0.350
0.444
0.380
0. 123
0.075
0.017
0. 016
. 0. 003
0.001
0
.
,
Co(NH 3) 2++
0.005
0.071
0.189
0.380
0.388
0.320
0.148
0.140
0.044
0.016
0.010
0.005
0. 001
0
Co(NH 3) 3++
0
0.004
o. 021
0.100
0.323
0.359
0.332
0.326
0. 198
0.114
0.084
0.057
0.016
0.006
0.002
Co(NH ) ++
3 4
0
0
0.001
0.014
0. 138
0.207
0. 381
0.389
0.455
0.414
0.377
0.326
0.180
0.106
0.560
Potential
Co(NH 3) 5
0
0
0
0.0005
o. 016
0.031
0.115
0.122
0.274
0.395
0.445
0.494
0.544
0.505
0.428
++
Co(NH 3) 6++
0
0
0
0
0
0.0007
0.0055
0.0061
0.026
0.060
0. 083
0.118
0.260
0.383
0.514
Eco
0.269
0.275
0.280
0.293
0.323
0.333
0.360
0.362
0.394
0.419
0.430
0.445
0.488
0. 519
0.550
C7:l
~t::l
zc:'l
Ul
~
<
z
:><:
1 111
n+
+ - H2
2
(13)
"M
n+
H+n
(14)
H22
J 2:1
k .
( 15)
This is kinetics.
d [H2]
dt
= k [Men+]
or = k [Men+]
[H2]
k [Men+] [H 2]
or
[H+]
or -=
k f.Men+J [H 2J .i
[tt+2J
In general
Rate = k [Men+] a
'
[H 2Jb
[H+J c . [Me]d
1Jf metal ions from solution to produce elemental metal often involves
hi ghly specific factors, such as surface area, which cannot be
v. neralised. For this reason some of the kinetic factors in the
hydr ogen reduction of Ag+, cu++, Ni++ and co++ species will be
ns idered separately and compared and contrasted.
Silver Salts
I t has been shown by Halpern and Webster 13 that aqueous solutions
of s ilver salts can be reduced to metallic silver by hydrogen. Using
11 l utions of silver acetate it was found that the rate was first
order with- respect to silver concentration. The rate with respect
Lo hydrogen was not determined but was assumed to be first order and
1.h r ate law was therefore expressed as
d [H2]
dt
-~
d [AgI]
- - = k [Ag ] LH 2]
dt
(16)
Copper Sal ts
Like t he Ag+ ion, cupric ions have a negative electrode potential
J 0. 33 7 v. ) and should therefore be reducible by hydrogen in bot!}
11 ldi and al kaline solutions.
'l'h
111 11 11
125
dt
and deduced the following reaction mechanism:
cu++ + H
(17)
( 18)
2cu+ - - - - . Cu + Cu++
''"1
(19)
In this scheme (19) is rapid while (17) and (18) are rate controlling.
This reaction path and rate equation is thus able to account for the
observed fact that the reduction slows down very rapidly and virtually
ceases at little more than 50% reduction even although thermodynamic
considerations, as given in the preceding section, clearly indicate
that the equilibrium position corresponds essentially to 100%
reduction . These workers also studied the reduction of cupric sulphate in sulphuric acid solution and obtained a rate expression of
the same form as above but in this case the reduction was both more
rapid and more complete. Addition of sodium sulphate to the system
pushed the equilibrium position even further towards complete reaction
and it was concluded that the ' hydrogen ions produced in the reduction
were being bound up by the sulphate ions to form the weakly dissociated
bisulphate ion and this therefore retarded the back reaction of
equation (17). In these acidic,,conditions it wa~ also found that tjJ.e rate of reaction was 'independent of the amount of copper powder in
_s uspension in the system and the reduction was therefore a
homogeneous reduction as opposed to a heterogeneous one.
The reduction of acidic cupric sulphate sol utions has al so bee n
described by Schaufelberger 1 in some det ail. No rate expression was
126
:::
I' I
12R
Ni + 2NH 4 + (x-2)NH 3
(20)
1. n
d [Ni++]
dt
= 2.303
10 2
1:10
Anthraquinone Used
Fig. 4. Nickel
Powder x 160
Fig. 3. Nickel
Powder x 160
1:11
...
- - o- - - - -- -
-0 -
...
0
TIME
Fi g.5 .
3
(M INI.I TU ) -
..
'
.- - ...,...
. -.. -----::. , - - - - - - ----,1
Pig. IL
Anh n111
...t
I.
1 5 0---~~,o~--~.-o~---'--.-0---.0----,00
TIME ( oMutu) -
Fig.7.
I
2
-0 4
-06
ANTHRAQUINONE CONCENTRATION (gm /
Fig.8.
.os
LITRE)-
ta r
110
ond.
e .
RT
Nh
= Ax . e RT
-EA
where Z
P.Z. e RT
P
6 s#
e .
RT
Nh
e R
-EA
e RT
Collision number
'Probability' factor
1:17
dt
where N
-d [Ni++]
and
dt
-d [Ni++]
dt
O gives
dt
k .
[Ag+]2 . [co]
-EA
=A
[Ag+J2 . [co] . e R
MO
dt
= 2. 56 x
10 13 .
[cu] 2 [co] . e
RT
141
142
1111d
dt
v2o3
by;
----~
Moo 2 + 20H -
No precise kinetic data were presented for the reaction but it was
shown that the reduction was accelerated by the addition of
molybdenum or molybdenum dioxide powder to the solution before
reduction. In other respects the rate of reduction varied with
conditions in a manner to be expected from the overall equation
given above, the rate was increased by an increase in hydrogen
pressure and temperature and by a decrease in the pH of the solution.
This work has been largely confirmed and extended to ammoniacal
solutions within the research laboratories of Sherritt Gordon Mines
and fuller details of the hydrogen reduction stage will be given in
a later paper. The molybdenum dioxide produced by this hydrometallurgical process can be reduced to metallic molybdenum very
conveniently by reduction with hydrogen in a furnace.
CONCLUSION
At the end of a survey of this nature it is possible to look back
and see that the most commonly used reducing gas in modern hydrometallurgy is hydrogen . The reasons for this are not difficult to
discover. Hydrogen is simple and cheap to produce on a large scale
and can be readily purified. Because of its molecular weight a
reduction can be carried out with less weight of reducing gas using
hydrogen than any other reducing gas and this is reflected in all the
mass transfer machinery within a plant designed to utilize gaseous
reduction of aqueous solutions to recover metals. From the chemical
po int of view the reaction products from aqueous hydrogen reductions
are either hydrogen or hydroxyl ions so that in effect there are no
by-products to contaminate the product or solution. Other reducing
gases such as CO or so 2 either produce gaseous or aqueous reaction
products which must be recovered or separated and in specific cases
11111y tend to contaminate the product.
The great advantage of gaseous reduction of metal solutions lies
111 t he high reaction rate with which solutions of even low metal
<:011tonts can be rapidly depleted of metal values and processed. The
1111 Lhod also offers the very attractive possibility of separating two
01 111or
m tals from the same soluqon if their reduction potentials
ILi'( 11 111'1' I I 11L l y far apart.
It should be noted that the pure nickel
14
'
110
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Mr.E.L.Brown,
President, and to the management of Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited
for permission to publish this paper.
The assistance of their colleagues in discussions, particular jy
Dr.D. J.I.Evans, is also gratefully acknowledged.
Thanks are also due to Professor H.H.Kellogg of Columbia
University for helpful discussions upon the potentials of solutions
of nickel ammines.
147
REFERENCES
1.
2.
S.Glasstone,
3.
4.
W.M.Latimer,
New York.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Oxidation Potentials
Selected Values of
'
11111
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
N.K.Adam,
(1956).
Physical Chemistry
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Wilcox, U.S.Re.12,815.
43.
44.
45.
46.
"
u
l hO
I I
Abstract
1~
I.JOHNSON
The purification of 'spent' nuclear reactor fuel involves the
separation of fission product elements from uranium, plutonium,
their alloys or compounds. These fission products range from zinc
(at No.30) through gadolinium (at No.64) and hence elements from
all the families in the periodic table are involved. Nuclear fuels
are usually clad in metallic alloys during use; often it may not be
practical to remove these clads prior to purification and hence one
may al$O need to separate the cladding metals during the purif ication process. Thus the purification of nuclear reactor fuels
presents rather formidable separations problems. The large variety
of different elements which must be separated makes it unlikely
that a single step process will be adequate . It would be convenient
to develop a single type of process which by suitable control of
conditions or reagents could be made to achieve different separations.
Separation by partition between a liquid metal and a fused salt
offers the possibility of achieving this objective. The large
differences in stability of different fused salts offer the
possibility that substantial differences in partition will exist
for different substances. The large variety of fused salts and
liquid metals which might be used allow considerable latitude in
the choice of container materials . . It is the purpose of this paper
to present the thermodynamic basis for these processes and to
indicate the ways in which practical objectives may be achieved .
The partition of a metal between a liquid metal solvent and a
fused salt involves the existence of the metal in two or more
oxidation states. It is conventional to consider the oxidation
number of the metal when. dissolved in a liquid metal as zero but to
consider it some positive integar when the metal is dissolved in a
fused salt. The transfer of the metal from liquid metal phase to
the. fused salt phase invol v.es the oxidation (i.e. , loss of
electrons) of the metal. Since electrical neutrality is maintained,
this oxidation must be balanced by the reduction of some substance.
In the discussion which follows, the second reduction will be
assumed to involve .the transfh of a second metal from the salt
phase to the metal phase. The balanced oxidation-reduction
equilibrium may be written
(fused salt)
154
(1)
PARTITION OF METALS
where M is the metal whose partition is of principal interest and R
i s the 'reductant'. X is some univalent anion.
The practical systems which will be discussed generally involve
t wo or more 'M' metals. In such systems all possible pairs of
redox couples must be balanced if the system is in equilibrium.
This condition is obtained when each 'M' couple is in balance with
t he 'reductant' couple .
The thermodynamic equili~rium constant , Ka, is related to the
st andard free energy change for the reaction by the equation:
_ m
- RT In Ka - ~ AGf R~ - C:.Gf M~
( 2)
where
xM~
8Rx
yM/yM~'
c onv
log D -log Ka
+ (-
-r log
8R
8Rxr
(4)
1
I.JOHNSON
- log Ka
(5)
m
- - log ~+ log 'YM
r
m
log
r
~~ + log 'YM~
( 6,,)
(7)
therefore,
log D = PKa
PR - pO
(8)
- 6Gf oMX
(9)
2.3 RT
PARTITION-OF METALS
matters as corrosion properties, melting point, cost, and stability
usually limits the choice of the salt system to a halide or possibly
a chalcogenide. If relatively low temperatures are desired, the
halides are limited to the chlorides, bromides, or iodides. The
available thermodynamic data are not extensive or good enough to
make a very critical choice between these three systems. The
chlorides were chosen for the examples to be considered in this
paper.
Bo
20
..
Rb,C1
~o
p,
Z
In
,,
Go
AQ
Bo
____
Cd
r~C
V
Pu
..'"
Z
~ -10
Go
Mo
Pd
..
z~
Cd
Sb
-20
..
G
'"
T<
-40
-oo~-----
11' 1g.1.
I.JOHNSON
'noble-metal leach' (if the fuel-fission product mixture is
initially in the salt phase) or 'salt oxidation' by the use of zinc
chloride (if the fuel-fission product mixture is initially in the
metal phase) might be considered the first step in a process. If
the salt phase from this first step is then contacted with a liquid
metal phase containing magnesium as the principal reductant,, a
separation of uranium from plutonium and the more active metals
would seem possible. However, the influence of the two other terms,
pR and pO, on the distribution coefficient must be studied before
the utility of the proposed process can be decided. It is unlikely
that the reduction or oxidation potential terms will be large
enough (either positive or negative) to change the phase to which a
metal will partition when the pKa values are greater than +5 or less
than -5. For values of PKa within this range, it is necessary to
evaluate the reduction and oxidation potentials before a reliable
prediction can be made of the phase to which the metal will
concentrate.
Since the reaction potential is proportional to a free energy
difference divided by the absolute temperature, a large dependence
on temperature is indicated. The free energy of formation of the
compounds of interest decreases with increasing temperature. This
temperature dependence is remarkably similar for compounds of the
same type. Thus, the free energy of formation of ionic chlorides
decrease by about 8 kilocalories per mole of chlorine between 500
and 1000K. The decrease ranges between about 6 and 9 kcal over
this temperature interval. Therefore, the difference between two
free energies of formation would be expected to be only slightly
dependent on temperature. This fact permits one to estimate PKa
values at a series of temperatures by the simple proportional
relation
(10)
,I
where PKa T and pKa T are the reaction potentials .at absolute
1
. 2
temperatures T1 and T2. The reaction potentials for UC1 3 and CeC1 3
when reduced with magnesium (to form U, Ce and MgC1 2) are -5.15
and 5. 70 at 1000K and -10,32 and 10. 97 at 500K, respectively, when
computed from the actual vaiues 2 of th e free ener gi es at the two
t mp ratur s .
15 13
PARTITION OF METALS
The inverse temperature dependence of the reaction potential
l eads to an increase in absolute value as the temperature is lowered.
This would be expected to spread out the distribution coefficients
11.nd generally lead to better separations. As will be noted below.
I.his improved separation is often almost completely counterbalanced
hy t he change in the reduction potential.
lllo:OUCTION POTENTIAL, pR
The reduction potential depends on the composition of the liquid
rnot al phase and the temperature. To investigate this dependence we
nons ider a liquid metal containing metals M, R and a sol vent metal
II at atom fractions xM' xR and x , respectively. The 'solvent'
8
111 tal S is chosen so that its compound SX
is of low enough relative
8
11(,abil ity so that essentially all S is present in the liquid metal
phase .
The dependence of the reduction potential on the liquid metal
nompos i tion would be too complex for calculation but for the fact
Llmt several simplifications are possible in systems of practical
Im portance. The concentration of M in the reductant-solvent system
111 gener ally low, being limited by its solubility to a few atom
t1111 ent. Thus, the effect of M on the activity of the reductant is
r 1111111 and to a very good approximation the activity of the reductant
1111 y be computed from the experimental data for the binary
1'11<luct ant-solvent system.
Th
R
S
IOI{ 'Yu .. XR log 'Y + Xs l og 'Y
u
M
M
( 11)
I.JOHNSON
under-estimate the effect of the metal in which M has the larger
activity coefficient. Thus when magnesium is added to zinc, the
activity coefficients of the actinide and rare-earth metals in the
solution are greater than would be computed using Equation 11. In
this case ~g is several orders of magnitude greater than yzn.
Darken 3 and Alcock and Richardson 4 independently suggested M
equations which are equivalent to Equation 11 with the addition of
a term (-~a;~x/2 . 3 RT) proportional to the excess free energy of
mixing ~G!~x of the reductant-solvent system. Since the excess free
energy of mixing of magnesium-zinc solutions is negative, the
correction would make log yM larger and closer to the values
actually observed. This correction would be the same for all
solutes in a given solvent system. The limited experimental data
available indicate that the deviations from Equation 11 depend in
part on the specific solute being considered. Nevertheless,
Equation 11 has proved to be extremely useful in making nearly
quantitative predictions of the effect of the reductant-solvent
composition on log yM. It must be used with care., keeping in mind
that errors as large as 0.5 in log yM may be made . In those few
cases where actual data on log yM as a function of reductant-solvent
composi,t ion are available for one solute. one may use the deviations
from Equation 11 as an approximate correction for other similar
solutes. It should be noted that Equation 11 is limited to
relatively low concentrations of M in the reductant-solvent systems.
We have generally limited the concentration of M to about 5 atom
percent .
The reduction potential may be represented by the approximate
equation
PR
m
s
r log ~ + log yM
(12)
,I
PARTITION OF MIITALS
-2
-3
0.2
0 .4
0.6
0 .8
1.0
l'lg.2.
xR.
111'
minimum will exist. The greater the difference between log '{
log '{. the greater the depth of the minimum. The more negative
lht value of log'{ . the larger the range of values of xR over which
11 1 is ne gative. Negative deviations from ideality in the reductant11 11 l v nt system t end to displace the minimum to larger values of xR
111ul to decrease the range of values of xR (if any) over which PR
11 n gat ive.
1111
11 11<1
n ugh .
101
I.JOHNSON
The temperature dependence of pR depends on the temperature
dependence of log yR and log yM. Activity coefficients in metallic
systems generally tend toward unity as the temperature increases.
Large differences in the temperature coefficient are found for
different systems; for typical reductant-solvent systems the effect
of temperature on log yR is gene:ally small. On the other hand, the
extensive data now available 5 on solutions of actinide metals in
liquid metals indicate large temperature coefficients for log yM.
Thus, the temperature dependence of pR is largely dependent on the
temperature dependence of log yM. (Since in practical cases a
separation of two solutes is under consideration, only the difference
between values of PR is significant. In this case the terms
involving log YR may cancel each other.) Some typical examples of
the temperature dependence of log yM will be given below when the
temperature dependence of the separation coefficient is discussed.
OXIDATION POTENTIAL, pO
162
PARTITION OF METALS
hence tend to shift the equilibrium of Equation 1 to the right. If
t he 'inert' salt forms a very stable complex with the oxidant, then
t he shift of the equilibrium will be significantly larger than
would be expected from the dilution alone . If the 'inert' salt also
f orms a stable complex with the oxidized form of the metal, then the
activity coefficient yM~ would be expected to be significantly less
t han unity; hence log
yM~
101< D c 1. 34 on the assumption that both yAlCl and Yucl are unity
3
3
(~>Kn 4. 76 and pR = -2. 78 at 725C). The experimental value of
I OK D is 0. 85. At xAlC l = 0. 5, log D would be 1. 59 if no salt
3
1 r 11 t.H wor pr A nt; t he expe r i ment al value is -1.01. Thus, the
v111.v 11f.1i11108 KAl 14 ompound has led to a large decrease in yAlCl
3
I.JOHNSON
It should be noted that the large changes in yAlCl
in this system
3
on addition of KCl would be independent of the metal chloride (MClm)
as long as the concentration is not comparable to that of AlC1 3 .
Differences in the extent that KCl complexed the various MClm
compounds would lead to changes in pO and in the separations possible.
Thus if one wished to reduce the tendency of a metal to transfer to
the metal phase by the modification of the salt composition, it
would be necessary to add a salt which formed a strong complex with
the particular metal halide and which did not strongly complex the
other metal halides in the system.
THE DISTRIBUTION COEFFICIENT
U (Mg-Zn Soln)
3
2 MgC1 2
(liq.)
(13)
PARTITION OF METALS
TABLE I
Computation of Distribution of Uranium Between
Magnesium-Zinc Solutions and Liquid Magnesium
Chloride (800C)
pO
PR
XMg
PK a
log D
3 log
3
15
8Mg log 'Yu - 2 log 8MgC1 log 'Yuc1 Cale. Obs
2
2
3
0.0063 -4.45
4.60
-0.74
0.00
0. 00
-0.59 -0.51
0. 059
-4.45
2.92
-0.31
0. 00
0.00
- 1.84 -1.87
0.144
-4.45
2.03
0.26
0.00
0.00
-2. 16 -2. 08
0.290
-4.45
1. 24
1. 10
0.00
0.00
-2.11 -2.03
0. 46 5
-4. 45
0.87
2. 02
0. 00
0.00
-1. 56 -1. 66
0. 606
-4. 45
0.43
2.74
0.00
0.00
-1. 28 -1. 30
0.698
-4.45
0.30
3. 19
0.00
0.00
-0.96 -0.99
0. 779
-4.45
0.21
3.60
0.00
0.00
-0.64 -0.63
0 . 802
-4.45
0. 18
3.72
0.00
0.00
-0.55 -0.51
:moK
Hrn
I.JOHNSON
activity coefficients are the reciprocal of the atom fraction
solubilities. The maximum error which would have been made if
Equation 11 had been used to estimate log Yu would be about -0.3
(at XMg = 0. 4) .
The oxidation potential involves only log Yucl
in pure liquid
3
~gCl
1.
PARTITIOO OF METALS
Fig.3.
would be 7. 198, 1.606, and -1 . 363 for cerium, plutonium and uranium
r espectively. The values of log D given in Figure 3 are 0. 44, -1.27
and -1.80 for Ce, Pu, and U. These latter results are understandable
when it is noted that the logarithm of the activity coefficients of
Ce, Pu, and U in pure zinc are -6.18, -3.12, and -0 . 80, respectively.
The large leveling effect of the liquid metal solvent, zinc, in
bringing the distribution coefficients for Ce, Pu, and U closer
together in value is rather typical of the other B-subgroup lowmel ting metals when combined with magnesium as the reductant.
Approximate values for the re~uction potential in zinc, aluminum,
admium, and lead for magnesium at xMg = 0.05, computed using
t:quation 12 are given in Table II. The ideal solution value was
omputed assuming YMg = 1 and yM = 1. It is seen that both positive
und negative deviations from the ideal solution valae are found in
the case of uranium; thus. Mg-Zn and Mg-Pb are relatively poor
r ducti on solutions for uranium while Mg-Al and Mg-Cd are good
' duction solutions. All of the solvents listed are excellent
r duction solutions for cerium.
Vulu s for log D, f or the di stribution of uranium and cerium
iQu d mo.gn sium chloride and each magnesium-solvent
h1 Lw1on
Hl7
I.JOHNSON
solution (xMg = 0.05), are tabulated in Table III. A significant
difference in the separation which can be achieved with the different
solvents is shown. Thus reduction with magnesium-cadmium would give
the greatest separation and reduction with magnesium-lead the
smallest separation of uranium from cerium. The values in Table Ill
illustrate the large shifts in distribution coefficient values which
may be produced by changing the metallic solvent used to dilute the
reductant metal.
TABLE II
= 0.05, t = 800C
pR
"'ij;
Reductant-Solvent
Mg-Zn
Mg-Al
Mg-Cd
Mg-Pb
Ideal Solution
Uranium
Cerium
2.55
0.44
0.08
4.62
1. 95
-2.83
-3.71
-1. 70
-2.21
1. 95
TABLE III
= 0.05, t = 800C
log D
Uranium
Cerium
Mg-Zn
Mg-Al
Mg-Cd
Mg-Pb
Ideal Solution
-1. 90
1. 28
0.40
2.41
1. 90
6. 06
'
-4. 01
-4.37
-0.17
-2.50
168
PARTITION OF METALS
SEPARATION COEFFICIENT
(14)
Therefore in terms of the potentials for the two metals one may
write
(15)
In the case where a=b=m, i.e., where the two metals have the same
oxidation number (valence) in the salt phase., Equation 15 may be
written in the form
(16)
where 6Gf 0 A~ and 6Gf 0 8Xm are the free energies of formation of A~
and B~. YA and y8 the activity coefficients of A and B in the metal
phase and y~ and Ys~ the activity coefficients of A~ and B~ in
the fused salt phase. Thus the separation coefficient depends on a
fre e energy term, a term involving only the metallic solvent and a
term involving the fused salt. Althoygh the composition of neither
t he liquid metal nor the fused salt appears explicitly in
Equat ion 16 it must be remembered that the activity coefficients
are dependent on these compositions.
If Equation 11 is used to compute log YA and y8 , log Q will be
When
H
II
ls gr nt r than
Yu
11'10
I.JOHNSON
xR __, O. When the reverse is true, the largest separation will occur
as xR __, 1. For example , in the separation of plutonium and cerium
,.zn
PARTITION OF METALS
ratio of the activity coefficients 'YAX and 'Ysx Knighton and
m
m
Steunenberg 16 have attempted to increase the separation factor of
plutonium and praseodymium by changes in the salt composition. While
the changes in the individual distribution coefficient were often
significant, their ratio was not greatly affected. Apparently
plutonium and praseodynium chlorides are similar in their complex
formation properties .
The effect of temperature on the separation coefficient depends
mainly on the effect 0f temperature on the difference in the reaction
potentials and the difference in the reduction potentials . The
temperature ranges of practical use are not large enough to cause
large changes in the oxidation potentials. Equation 10 indicates
that. pKa is inversely proportional to the absolute temperature
and therefore will be markedly affected by temperature. The terms
log 'YA and log 'YB in Equation 16 are both linear in the reciprocal
of the absolute temperature and are found in practice to have co efficients for the l/T term comparable in magnitude to the term
pKa T T2 in Equation 10. Thus , to a first approximation, the
effect of temperature on the separation coefficient is expected to
be small . The effect of temperature on each particular separation
coefficient must be examined separately. For example , changing the
t emperature from 1000 to 800K lowers the separation coefficient for
plutonium-uranium but raises the separation coefficient for ceriumplutonium. Since the temperature dependence of the activity
coefficients in the pure solvent differs from that in the pure
reductant metals (i . e., log 'Y~ and log 'Y~ in Equation 11), the effect
of temperature on the separation coefficient will vary with the
liquid metal composition. If the temperature dependence of the
act ivity coefficients of the solvents in the two pure liquid metals
is known, good predictions can be made of the effect of temperature
on the separation coefficient.
APPLICATI ON OF PARTITION STUDIES TO THERMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS
The ease which distribution coefficients can be measured to good
accuracy s uggests the i r use for the determination of thermodynamic
properties, Equati on 8 indicates that from knowledge of D and any two
f tho potentials, t he t hi rd can be computed. On the other hand, if
num rioo.l values of t wo of t he potential s are not known but the
poi, ntiuls o.r known tb ' be constant , the changes i n the value of the
71
I.JOHNSON
third potential can be computed .from measurements of the distribution
coefficient. This scheme has been particularly useful for the study
of the variation of the reduction potential with metal composition.
Since the activity of the reductant is usually known as a function
of reductant-solvent composition the variation of log yM with
composition can be studied. If Equation 8 is written in the form
log D +
m
;
log aR
= pKa
- pO
log yM
(17)
172
PARTITION OF METALS
The use of distribution studies for the determination of values
of the reaction potential and hence values of free energies depends
on the availability of accurate values of both pR and pO. Probably
pR and pO can be estimated well enough to indicate gross errors in
free energy values but such estimates do not seem particularly
attractive for accurate determinations.
17:1
I.JOHNSON
Symbols
;11:
M, A, B
m, r , s, a, b
Ka
Separation coefficient
)llliii
{. ~
8Rxr
L'GfOMXm.
pR
'
pO
Absolute temperature , K
..
17'1
log -v.:v
.
, IYJAm
PARTITION OF METALS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The thermodynamic treatment of liquid metal - fused salt
partition presented in this paper originated from the need to
furnish a rational basis for process development work. Mr.James
B.Knighton and Dr . Robert K.Stuenenberg have worked closely with the
author. They have made all their experimental data available and
often extended the range of their experiments to obtain data
helpful in the testing of theoretical predictions. Their help was
invaluable and greatly appreciated. Finally, special thanks are due
to Dr.H.M.Feder and Professor Scott Wood for many valuable
discussions.
This study was performed under the auspices of the U.S.Atomic
Energy Commission.
17h
I.JOHNSON
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
C.B.Alco~k
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
A.E.Martin, Argonne
14.
15.
...
Nationa.~
170
PARTITION OF METALS
16.
177
Abstract
New decomposition pressure data obtained using a corrosionresistant pyrex bellows mercury manometer are reviewed for the
cobalt, copper, iron, nickel and zinc sulphate systems. The data
are combined with published results for the metal-oxygen and metalsulphur systems to construct predominance area (log Pso vs log P0 )
and predominance volume (log
170
T.R.INGRAHAM
INTROOUCTION
In this paper a description will be given of some of the experimental techniques used recent!~ to establish the thermodynamic
properties of cupri~ sulphate r 1o), cupric oxysulphateClO), cobaltbus
sulphate<ll), tricobalt tetroxide(ll), ferric sulpliate< 12 ), nickelous
sulphate< 12 >, zinc sulphate<l3) and zinc oxysulphate< 13 ). The
techniques include (a) the use o.f differential thermal analysis and
effluent gas analysis for identifying reactions and phase changes and
for estimating the enthalpies of the . phase changes, and (b) the use
of a corrosion-resistant pyrex-.bellows mercury manomet er for
mo
T.R.INGRAHAM
During the course of this work it was observed that the DTA
patterns were highly reproducible from run to run, and that, by
alteration of the paper speed and amplification, it was possible to
draw peaks having areas of the order of 150 cm 2. This made it
possible to make interesting comparisons of the heats of the various
processes from the areas under the peaks. For example, by accepting
the established heat of transition of potassium sulphate and assuming
that the thermal conductivities of potassium sulphate and zinc
sulphate are identical, and then substituting potassium sulphate for
the usual alumina reference in DTA from the areas under the respective
curves, Ingraham and Kellogg< 13 ) made an estimate of the enthalpy of
a to ft transition for zinc sulphate which was in good agreement with '
an estimate made on the basis of the difference in slopes of a log p
versus reciprocal temperature relationship for the a form and for the
ft form. The limiting factors in this technique of estimation are
the validity of the assumption of identical thermal conductivities,
and the reproducibility of packing the DTA cell. The error due to
packing is probably less than 10%.
APPARATUS
The apparatus used in this program has been described in detail
in previous papers< 15 16 >. The essential features consist of a
resistance-wound tube furnace fitted with an inconel sleeve for
reducing temperature gradients, and a u-tube mercury manometer. The
temperature of the furnace can be maintained with 1. 5C at 950C
with a gradient of about 0.2C/cm. The exposed end of the mercury
manometer is fitted with a corrosion-resistant, flexible pyrex
bellows. The mercury column is deflected about 30 cm for a 1
atmosphere change in pressure. within the apparatus. The manometer
response is linear and the manometer is maintained at 100.0 0.5C
in a silicone oil bath to prevent condensation of the sulphur trioxide
liberated during decomposition. No effects attributable to thermal
diffusion have been observed ih1 this apparatus< 13 >. The open end of
the manometer is vented to a container in which the pressure is
maintained at 76.00 cm of Hg. When the readings of the sample
pressure are to be made, the air pressure in this container is alternately increased and decreased to minimize any errors caused by
sticking of the mercury column.
Ill :'.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
The sulphate samples were placed in a platinum boat in the furnace.
As a catalyst, the platinum ensured the equilibration of the sulphur
tri oxide, sulphur dioxide and oxygen at each experimental temperature.
Re adings of the total pressure generated by these gases were made at
regular intervals to establish the equilibrium pressure. The
t emperature was then raised (often about 20C) and another series of
re adings made. The procedure was repeated with a decrease of
t emperature.
The time required to attain equilibrium depended on the compound
and varie d within the limits of 6 to 30 hours. Cobalt sulphate was
t he mo t difficult material to r e- f orm . It was found that nickel
sul phut , whi h wuH qual l y dif icult tor -form us ing a small
1tt~
T. R. INGRAHAM
RESULTS
The total decomposition pressures measured in the experiments
were resolved for the partial pressure of sulphur trioxide on the
basis of the argument by KelleyCl 7) that: a) the total pressure is
the sum of the partial pressures , b) the sulphur trioxide, sulphur
dioxide and oxygen are present throughout the app~ratus in their
equilibrium proportions at the sample temperature , and c) there has
been no reaction to alter the 2-to-1 ratio of sulphur dioxide to
oxygen in the system. These three assumptions may be combined to
develop a cubic equation. In this work, an IBM 1620 computer
program was used to obtain solutions of the equation.
For extrapolation to room temperature to check the reasonableness
of the values, the partial pressures of sulphur trioxide were incorporated, with the appropriate specific heat terms, in the type of
sigma equation suggested by KelleyC 18 ).
The results of the experiments with copper, cobalt, iron, nickel
and zinc sulphates are shown in Table 1 as constants for the
three-term equation,
6G 0 = a
-'
+ bT l ; g T + cT.
L~-104
___
TABLE I
Free Energy Relationships
6G 0 =a + b T log T + cT
Reaction
CoSO4 ;:::: CoO + S0 3
Co 3o 4 ;:::: 3 coo + 1/2 o 2_
2 CUS04 ;:::: cuo CuS04 + S03 .
.uOcuso 4 ;:::: 2 CuO + S0 3
Range K
62,362* 15.000
-92.784
950-1250
36,153
-29.306
950-1250
50,945
3.519
-54.913
750-1000
49,914
3.324
-50. 121
750-1000
-0.056
-42.314
800-1100
2.900
-53. 666
1000-1200
53,733
-45.210
800-1007
39,281
-30. 866
1007-1200
110 3
;:::: so 2 + 1/2 02
57, 189
7.598
-65.629
800-1200
25,009
5.563
-40.522
700-1300
111
T. R. INGRAHAM
for the lead-sulphur-oxygen system by Kellogg and Basu<2 3 ). The construction of these diagrams requires information on the free energies
for the metal - sulphur systems and for the metal-oxygen systems.
With this information, the free-energy change and corresponding
equilibrium constant are calculated for the various reactions in
the system at the temperature of interest. The essential features
of the calculation can be illustrated with two examples:
For the system:
(1)
K = Pso 2/Po 2 .
(2)
and
log
Pso
log K + log
Po
(3)
P80
Po .
2
to the ratio of the multiple of the log P0 term to that of the log
2
P80 term; in this instance +1.
2
'
Pso 2
log
Pso
(4)
Po1/2
.
2
K - 1;2 1og
(5)
Po.
(6)
mo
+4
NIS
"'
Ni*
- 4
N IO
-12
-20
111 11{.1.
-16
-12
-4
Th
.
I rtrnl -2 and log Po
1117
T. R. INGRAHAM
(Po
2
=5
= 1%)
16~-----------.,-----,
10501<
FoS
- 16
Fe
FeO
-24'-L----L..-'-----'---~~-~~--~
-40
Fig.2.
-32
-24
-1 6
J'lg. 3.
11111
T. R. INGRAHAM
c"s
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
c"
8
/
/
Co
Fig.4.
~---------------.
0
0
POSSIBL E SEPARATIONS
BASED
-
ONLY
1000K
OF
Fe-Cu
3 - 10
3 - 10
1 -10
1-10
I - 10
3 - IO
Ft -Co
AT
PRE SSURES
-t0 S02
Ft - NI
ON
METALS
e -Zn
1 -!0
1-10
Cu- Co
1 -2
1-2
Cu - Zn
1- 2
1- 2
I -Hi
,_,,,
.,,,. CoJ'Of
1-2
NI - Co
Ni - Zri
Zn -Co
N! -Cu
Fig .5.
- 10
LOG
,,,
-2
If) J
T. R. INGRAHAM
TABLE II
Values of Log
Pso
Po
0 and -10
log P80
2
Reaction
at log P0
2
CoS0 4
so 2 + 1/2 o2
Co 3o4 + 80 2 + 1/3 o2
CoO +
CoS0 4 ; 1/3
'
=o
at log P0
2
-3.4438*
+1. 5562
-2.9449
+O. 3884
-1.6966
+3.3034
-2.3912
+2 .6088
-o. 6277
+4.3723
-2.7230
+2.2277
-2. 0960
+2.9040
-3.3940
+1. 6060
-10
Metals
Fe-Cu
3-10
3-10
Fe-Co
1-10
1-10
Fe-Ni
1-10
3-10
Fe-Zn
1-10
1-10
Cu-Co
1-2
1-2
Cu-Zn
1-2
1-2
Ni-Co
1-2
1-2
Ni-Zn
1-1. 5
1-1. 5
Zn-Co
*
*
Ni-Cu
..
%02
o/t.S02
10:1
T.R.INGRAHAM
Their linear relationships for each system are shown in Figure 5.
The shaded square corresponds with gas compositions in the range
1-10% each of sulphur dioxide and oxygen. For any specific system,
the area below the line represents the region of oxide or oxysulphate
stability and that above the line represents the area of stability of
the corresponding oxysulphate or normal sulphate.
Study of the diagram, on the assumption that the solid phases are
at unit activity and equilibrium can be approximated, indicates that
at l000K the sulphate separations shown in Table III might be feasible
at the suggested gas compositions .
Assessment of the possibility of making these separations at
other temperatures can be made by repeating the calculations using
the free-energy relationships shown in Table I.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is indebted to H.H.Kellogg of Columbia ' University, who
co-authored the zinc work reviewed in this paper, for much helpful
advice and guidance, and to R.A.Charlebois for most of the experimental work, P.Marier for the DTA and EGA experiments, and S.Kaiman
for the X-ray analyses.
104
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
~.
ri .
G.Marchal,
<J.
'{.
II,
I,
].Chim.Phys~
H.H. Kellogg,
22 , 559 (1925).
tt ,
I '!.
1 1,
lI.
II ,
n. N.l11 l 11 11 f11iH
IL !ICI
1111.
T.R.INGRAHAM
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Ibid., 24.
...
'
106
Abstract
'l'll!o:ORETICAL STWIES
The purpose of the calculational work was to define the temperaand the initial amounts of tungsten hexacarbonyl, steam and
h,vdr oge n to yield a final plating gas in equilibrium with tungsten
11111t.1 Ll at one atmosphere pressure.
The final plating gas was to be
11 1111c1uburizing and nonoxidizing to tungsten metal. The condition of
i11 I 11 l111um vol ume of plating gas per unit weight of deposited tungsten
w1 11 1 l AO desir ed in order to maximize deposition rates .
A detailed
11111. 11111 of t he ca l c ula tional model is given in the Appendix to this
1. tll' ll
IN Ill
I '.
First, since
I 1111111 L11 11 1:1L1' bo11y l 111 highly un table at high t emperature, it is fully
11111 111111 1111 1 d
i'111<l ur Li u
cmcJJ t
(A)
co + 3H 2
CH 4 + H20
(B)
WC + co 2
w+
(C)
and
2co
or
W0 2 + 2H 2 t= W + 2H 20
(D)
It can be shown that methane formation is negligible over the conditions of interest and the problem in actual practice is simplified to
one less unknown and one less restraint.
...
'
"'
3:
0
I
~o~~ ,,c:P
d--WC
25
'
20
"'
15
"'
<1>
:a:
0
.;::
:s
10
\200K
we
w
WC W
10
15
20
1300K
WC
1400
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
H2
Initial Moles, /W (C0) 6
Fig.1.
1.5
28. 0
It, <tLll b H <11 t hnt at 1300K t hese limits are wide and allow for
<011111<1< rnbl1 J' r 1 1 <10111 111 rn1 xing W( 0) 0 nrnl co 2 to give metall ic tungsten .
'flt
TABLE I
Equilibrium Gas Composition over Tungsten-Tungsten Carbide Mixtures
After Reaction of Tungsten Hexacarbonyl at 1100K and 1200K
Initial Molar Ratios
for W-WC Equilibrium
Reactants
1200K
ll00K*
2. 7011 *
4.603
54.621
25.586
;..
N
0
N
.....
4.062
4.938
45.330
8.670
20. 790
3.210
?"
0
~
~
Gas Components
co
co 2
H2
H20
CH 4
.L
Mole
Moles Xi
Fraction per Mole
W(C0) 6
xi
0.0492
0.0204
0.6540
0.2764
(0.0002)
1.0000
Mole
Mole
Mole
Mole
Moles Xi
Moles Xi
Moles Xi
Moles Xi
Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole
W(C0) 6
W(C0) 6
W(C0) 6
W(C0) 6
xi
xi
xi
xi
4.241
1.759
56:379
23.828
0. 313
o. 138
0.341
0.208
4.164
1. 836
4.537
2.767
0.2853
o. 1147
0.3855
0.2145
4.280
1. 720
5.783
3.217
0.1627
0.0373
0. 7303
0.0697
4.881
1.119
21.909
2.091
0.0888
0. 0112
0.7672
0.1328
5.328
0.672
46.032
7.968
86.207 II
1. 000
13.304
1.0000
15. 000
1. 0000
30.000
1.0000
60 . 000
w-wc-wo 2,
::i::
TABLE II
;g
Reactants
ol es H2/ W(C0) 6
ol es H20/ W(C0) 6
1300K**
0.06
1. 44
6.885
2.115
2.28
1. 72
21 . 39
2. 61
>"'3
51.06
2.94
>-i
.,,~
:...i
>"'3
Gas Components
co
co2
H2
H20
Mole
Mole
Mole
Mole
Moles Xi
Moles Xi Mole
Moles Xi
Moles Xi
Moles Xi
Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole Fraction per Mole
x.l
X.l
W(C0) 6
W(C0) 6
W(C0) 6
W(C0) 6
W{C0)6
xi
xi
xi
0.662
0. 138
o. 146
0.054
4.965
1. 035
1. 100
0. 400
0.518
0. 082
0. 310
0. 090
5. 18
0. 82
3.10
0. 90
0. 359
0. 041
0.500
0. 100
5. 39
0.61
7. 50
1. 50
0. 189
0. 011
0.724
0. 076
5.67
0.33
21. 72
2. 28
0. 097
o. 003
0.854
0.046
5.82
o. 18
51. 24
2. 76
1. 000
7. 500
1 . 000
10. 00
1. 000
15.00
1. 000
30.00
1. 000
60.00
CH4
2:
At this or higher temperatures and one atmosphere pressure, three solid phases and a gas phase cannot
coexist.
Cl
LE III
~-------
::..5
x.:r.:~e s
: :oc o:
c...
c...
=s
1400 K
oles H:/W(C0 ) 6
oles H20/W( CO ) 6 \
0.942
4.246
0.754
0. 558
23 . 028
0.972
)>
Gas
Component s
co
co2
H2
H20
Mole
Fraction
x 1.
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
, Mole
Fraction
Mole
Fraction
xi
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
xi
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
0. 7509
0. 0491
0.1747
0. 0253
5. 632
0.368
1. 310
0. 190
0.4795
0. 0205
0. 4577
0. 0423
5.754
0.246
5.492
0.508
o. 1968
0.0032
0.7708
0. 0292
5.904
0.096
23 . 124
0.876
1. 0000
7.500
1.0000
12.000
1. 0000
30.000
CH4
c...
r:
ABLI;. H
1200K
Reactant s
"ti
13. 053
10.947
3.744
5.256
Si;
31. 667
22.333
>
>-3
H
"lj
"ti
::::::
Mole
Fraction
x1
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
0.2774
0.1226
0.3723
0.2277
1.0000
4.161
1.839
5.585
3.415
15.000
Mole
Fraction
Gas Components
co
co2
H2
H20
.L
Mole
Fraction
xi
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
xi
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0)6
0.1387
0.0613
0.4964
o. 3036
1. 0000
4.161
1. 839
14.892
9.108
30.000
0.0693
0.0307
0.5585
0.3415
1. 0000
4.158
1.842
33. 510
20. 490
60.000
t.:i:.:1
>-3
11
c;:l
Ul
>-3
zt.:i:.:1
~
>-3
TABLE V
Equilibrium Gas Composition over Tungsten-Tungsten Dioxide Mixtures
After React ion of Tungsten Hexacarbonyl at 1300K and 1400K
Initial Molar Ratios
for W-W0 2 Equilibrium
Reactants
Moles H2/W(C0) 6
Moles H20/W(C0) 6
11.22
12.78
0. 28
3.72
..
co
co 2
H2
H 2o
2:
c...
c...
1400K
0.949
5. 051
II
24.3
29;7
0
C')
II
Mole
Fraction
x.l
0.409
o. 191
0.219
0.181
1.000
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
4.09
1. 91
2. 19
1.81
10.00
Mole
Fraction
xi
0. 136
0.064
0.438
0.362
1.000
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(CO) 6
4.08
1. 92
13.14
10.86
30.00
~0
?'"
Gas Components
II
1300K
8:.;;:
Mole
Fraction
xi
Moles Xi
per Mole
W(C0) 6
xi
Moles X1
per Mole
W(C0) 6
0.2425
0.2575
0.3366
0. 1634
1. 0000
2. 910
3.090
4.039
1. 961
12.000
0.0686
0.0314
o. 4363
0.4637
1. 0000
4.116
1.884
26.178
27.822
60.000
Mole
Fraction
~
~
::i::
0
~
~
Water vaporizer
Manometer
Hydrogen or
helium supply
Vent
r oler
eoctor
3 [Heater2
>
_) ("~'
Dus t traps
Oibutyl phthalate
bubbler
Tungsten
hexocorbonyl
vaporizer
I'ig. 2.
111 th
Fig.3.
as the deposits were very fine grained and porous. Germer and
Lander have reported on the pyrophoricity of some of their
products(l) which are believed to be similar to these reported
herein. Oxygen contents in the 500 to 1000 ppm range were usually
obtained. However, this range of oxygen content is somewhat less
than the range of oxygen contents for most fine particle size
commercial grades of tungsten powder< 22 ) . Caves has pointed out in
a private communication that high purity tungsten particles of a
commercial grade of much larger size than reported in this paper
have three to five times the oxygen content of tungsten prepared in
the experimental investigation< 23).
A limited number of experiments using mixtures of carbonyl, carbon
dioxide and helium were also carried out. The deposits for these
runs also had considerable porosity . However, material with carbon
contents of less than 10 ppm could be readily prepared at temperatures of about 1000c. At temperatures around 500c, Lander and
Germer were unable to deposit carbon-free tungsten with carbon
dioxide additions (1) ,,..
'
The porous nature of the deposits is believed to be due to gas
phase nucleation of tungsten , tungsten carbide, and/or tungsten
oxide particles which are subsequently reacted, s inter ed, and/or
cemented by subsequent co~ting, to the surface of the larger particles in the fluidized bed. Further work to avoid this ga phas
nucl eation was conduct d in a part i o. l vacuum uH In~~ 11 li (ltt ct Lungl'lt n
20fl
TABLE VI
1-1
Sm:.ber
Initial
Bed,
g.
W(C0)5
Fed,
g./hr.
Cfi07 -6
40.0
20707 -9
20707-10
Run
Temperature
Bed W(C0) 6,
Tungsten
H20,
Final
H2/
W(C0) 6 W(C0) 6 Bed, g.
Deposited~
Efficiency,
%
Carbon
Content,
ppm
Reactor
Diameter,
in.
c.
c.
7.33
1000
129
50.3
744
47.3
2.66
35.0
1000
80.0
13.85
1000
138
44 . 3
736
97.8
9.62
83.4
75
80.0
15.20
1000
136
60.6
57
101. 8
10.90
72.0
g./hr.
;;g
~
>-3
2:
~
~
Fig . 4.
CONCLUSIONS
The overall conclusion that can be made from the computational
and experimental work of gas plating from tungsten hexacarbofiyl is
that:
(1)
(2)
(3)
l1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14,
212
16 .
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
' 2.
2 ~.
w[co) 6
(1)
where n 1
= gaseous
1 = - Cnco + nco ]
6
(2)
Lllg
~ = - [xco + Xco ]
...
2
(3)
'
ABLE A- I
=
Temperature
1300K
1200K
llOOK
1400K
1500K
"'Cl
f':.F 0f
Cal.
6F f0
Cal.
6F f0
Cal.
6F f0
Cal.
f':. FO
f
Cal.
log 10Kf
C02(g)
-94, 617
18. 798
-94,638
17.235
-94,653
15.912
-94,663
14.777
-94, 670
+13.793
OO(g )
-49,956
9.925
-52,046
9.478
-54, 121
9.098
-56, 185
8.270
-58, 240
+8. 485
"'Cl
320(g)
-44,708
8.882
-43,367
7.898
-42 , 017
7.063
-40,657
6.347
-39,292
+5.724
C(c )
-9,950
+1. 977
-10,270
+l.871
-10,600
+1. 782
-10, 950
+1. 710
-11,630
+1. 695
2C(c)
I0 2 (c)
+ll, 100
-2.206
+7,890
-1. 437
+4,670
-0.785
-1,460
-0.228
-1, 750
0.255
-93, 179
18,512
-89,078
16.223
-85,012
14.291
-80, 984
12.642
-76,989
11. 215
f()3 ( C)
-134,162
26 . 654
-128, 411
23.386
-122,697
20.626
- 117, 021
18.267
-111,380
+16.227
0 3 (c)
-55,927
11.111
-54,655
9.954
-53,382
8.974
-52, 109
8.134
-50,833
+7.404
CH4(g)
+7,257
-1. 442
+9,897
-1. 802
+12,547
-2. 109
+15,206
-2, 374
+17,871
-2.604
log11ff
log 10Kf
log 10Kf
log 10Kf
;:..
o-3
......
!.;
o-3
rA
TABLE A-II
standard Free Energy Change and Logarithms of
Equilibrium Constants of React ions of Interest
1200K
llOOK
t,pO
t,pO
Reaction
~
:::::
Cal.
t,pO
loglOKR
Cal.
1300K
t,pO
loglOKR
Cal.
1400K
loglOKR
+l,504 -0.253
+13,589 -2.285
-40,532 6.816
Cal.
'
1500K
6F 0f
loglOKR
Cal.
log 10KR
~
>
!='
(')
0
0
:z
-0.925
+816 -0.149
-2,990 +0.503
-0.748
+980 -0.165
-330 +0.052
-1,595 +0.231
+8.882
-43,370 +7 . 898
-42,020 +7.063
-40,660 +6.347
-40,657 +6.347
+o. 006
-1. 043
-780 +0.138
+8,680 -1.980
-1 , 490 +0.247
+12, 100 -2 . 035
-2,862 +0.416
+18,948 -2.761
-17,207 +3.419
2H2(g)
-49,956 +9.925
+ 1/202 := co
XI ~ + lf0 2 (c) ;: 2C0 +
2
{c )
-20,617 +3,673
-52, 046 +9. 476
~
0
!'--<
?=
~-
xc
c....
c....
-. 709
-0.663
-0.628
t;;l
><
- -=-Tu g 6 + b
Cxco + xH o + 2Xco ]
(5)
+ 2nH 0 ,
2
(6)
(7)
111 n
x0
+ Xco
+ XH
+ XH 0
(8)
=1
Lion
3, 5, 7 and 8, respectively.
17
(9)
And :
x2co
( 10)
. p .
"'
jri
(~,"r
aw
Kv
awo2
( 11)
and:
aw
Kxr = - -
awo 2
Method of
(~~
Xco
Calcul ~tion
(12)
'
KIV
+ Xco - - - = 06
2:ng
- x 2co
CO is obtained, then
1 -
the sum of XH
co 2
(13)
Since:
co - co 2
(14)
+ XH 0 is obtained.
2
(15)
W-Wc-wo 2
(16)
and:
(17)
'
' 20
PANEL II
DISCUSSION
Dr.Wallace - I wish to thank the panel for their interesting
presentations which we have just heard. I am sure that the audience
will wish to ask some questions. However, we will first have some
intra-panel discussion. To start the discussion I should like to ask Dr.Senderoff, what
material he used for the containers for his fluoride melts.
Dr.Senderoff - Most of the containers which we used in working with
the tantalate solutions were nickel. Platinum and molybdenum were
used in a few cases. With columbium we used platinum since nickel
was unsuitable. As we go to more noble metals, it looks as though
platinum or gold will be the most suitable containers. For the
nickel-nickel fluoride, Flinak reference electrode, the nickle
ruc ible can itself be the electrode. In order to maintain an inert
atmosphere, all compoqents were contained in a Hastelloy can filled
with argon.
Dr.Ingraham - May I add one more question? You are well known for
your work on fused salt potential series in chlorides. Have you
done enough work on the various fluorides to be abl~ to say how
lhe potentials agree between the chloride melts and the fluoride
111 Its.
nr.Senderoff - I have not studied the same systems in them, so I
nn' t say. It is pretty clear that if we interpolate among the
vurious elements that we have looked at in both systems, that in the
fluor ide system, the EMF series is spread out more. That is, there
mlght be a total of four volts from fluorine to sodium in the alkali
t'luoride solvent, but it is nearer 3 volts from chlorine to sodium
In the alkali chloride solvent. Nickel is extremely noble in both
HyHt ms compared to its place in water systems, and in general the
1 1 rn nts take their equivalent places in chlorides and fluorides.
l'd like to ask Dr.Johnson a question. He pointed out that a very
wid spread of activity coefficients is observed as one varies the
mt l1tl so lvent.
I would expect a similar effect if one varied the
rm It, HOlv nt.
Do you have any information or opinions along those
t
I Ill H?
PANEL II
.,.,.
' ' '"
..f
DISCUSSION
chloride). You are correct in suggesting that both the activity of
the oxidant and the activity coefficient of the solute halide can
be modified by changing the solvent composition. However, only
changes in the activity coefficient of the solute halide will affect
the separation coefficient. It would be interesting to determine
whether sufficient differences exist in the acidity of the actinide
and rare-earth halides to markedly change their activity coefficients
by the addition of a basic component to the fused salt mixture.
Dr.Wallace - I have a question to ask you Dr.Johnson. I was concerned about one point in connection with your paper. I assume I
misunderstood something. Perhaps you could clarify this for me and
others, as well. I thought I picked up the impression from your
sl ide that magnesium was more effective in displacing certain species
f rom the fused salt solutions when in reduced concentration, (mole
~r action a half or two-tenths) than it was in the pure material.
I
can't understand this and it seems anti-thermodynamic to me . It
~ee ms to me that you're saying that the activity of the magnesium is
higher in the solution of mole fraction 0.2 or thereabouts, than it
is in the purer material. If this were the case, you should have a
t wo-phase' system.
Ur.Johnson - Nol I hope I have not given that impression. The
1Lct ivity of magnesium in a 20 atom per cent mixture, for example,
I~ certainly less than in pure magnesium.
The greater reducing
t>otential of a dilute magnesium-zinc solution compared to pure
mugnes tJrn is due to the very small activity coefficient of the metal
b i ng reduced in this metallic solution. Thus the low activity of
I.ho reducing agent in a dilute metallic solvent may be compensated
t or by a small activity coefficient of the metal being reduced.
'l'h se two factors are taken into account in the reduction potential
t. rm. The neglect of the activity coefficient factor can lead to
v ry erroneous predictions of the reduction potential of a metallic
11ol ution. When activity coefficient data are lacking a qualitative
Ind ication can be obtained by examination of the phase diagrams of
t.h metal being reduced with each of the metallic constituents of
t.h , r duction solution. Low solubilities of the solute metal comh Ind with s table intermediate phases may be taken as an indication
t.l11tL t h activity coefficient of the solute is small.
PANEL II
L_.- _ _
224
_ __
DISCUSSION
hydroxides rather than soluble complexes. The reduction of these
compounds with hydrogen might be by an entirely different process
not related to the EMF considerations discussed. Does one have any
information on stability of these ammonia complexes at the
temperature of operation?
Dr.Meddings - Yes, indeed one does. In the first case, I should
perhaps have mentioned that the nickel ammine solutions used for
the commercial production of nickel by hydrogen reduction are
buffered with ammonium sulphate. The molar ratio of ammonium sulphate to nickel sulphate is about three to one. As a result there
is no discernible hydrolysis at the usual operating temperature of
350 F.
ilot.
PANEL II
Dr.Wallace - I have one other question for Dr.Johnson. As many_of
us know, there has been work done primarily by Bredig that shows
that the alkali halides and the alkali metals are miscible in all
proportions at elevated temperatures. Your partitions, of course,
depend on the fact that you're dealing with two phases. Are there
instances in which things go along for a little while, and then you
achieve miscibility of your metallic phase and salt phase, so that
the two phase character disappears? Or is this an effect which is
unique with the alkali halides?
Dr.Johnson - We have not seen evidence for complete miscibility of
the metal and salt phases in the systems which we have studied.
Since these systems consisted of a binary magnesium-zinc liquid
metal phase and a magnesium chloride-alkali metal chloride fused
salt phase miscibility is not to be expected. It is generally
found that extensive miscibility of a liquid metal and a fused salt
is confined to the pure metal and the pure halide of the metal.
The addition of a foreign salt to the fused salt phase greatly
decreases the solubility of the metal.
Dr.Wallace - I have a question for Dr.Ward. In cracking or
pyrolizing this carbonyl since you want to keep the tungsten free of
oxygen , I would think that you would want to avoid putting any
other oxygen in the system. Why put steam in? What is the purpose
of the steam?
Dr.Ward - That's to decarbonize the tungsten monocarbide that's
being formed. See, there's a balance drawn between the deoxidation
and decarburization.
Dr.Wallace - Is it a kinetic 'proposition then? Would it not be
possible to decarbonize through the methane formation?
Dr.Ward - At the temperatures ,imvolved, we .couldn't, because the
equilibrium constant for the formation of methane is unfavorable.
We only have about 0.008 of a mole fraction of methane formed at
equilibrium.
~
DISCUSSION
faradays, of reduction reactions. Do you believe that agreement
within 5% of an integral value is about as good as can be expected
using your method?
Dr.Senderoff - There are a number of ways of getting n, depending
upon what reactions you are dealing with. The most general way is
the least accurate. That is the plot of E as a function of t that
we have shown in the paper as Fig.7. The fact that we have a
plateau in which E varies slowly with t (i.e., Fig.1) tells us
that this will not be a sensitive measure of n, but it is
nevertheless useful. However, where there is a step-wise reaction,
obtaining n by the ratio of the lengths of the two plateaus is an
extremely sensitive measure of n as shown in Table III. If r 2/r 1
can be obtained with even moderate accuracy, it provides a valuable
criterion for evaluating the n for each step. A third way of getting
n requires an independent knowledge of the diffusion coefficient.
If one knows the diffusion coefficient of the ion under study, the n
.for the reaction may be obtained from the equation,
11
11 m ved
((i11< st i on from the floor) - How do you prevent iron from entering the
11 trolyt e when plating on ferrous alloys?
111, Hn111 lnrnl1 f - That is part of the, shall we say, art of plating which
1 cl 1!111' i xp ct t
up in this discussion. The art consists of getting
.v111 11 11l11LJ111<
1,1111
I'll!'
<ll1111<~lv
PANEL II
wi ll not dissolve rapidly, and what does dissolve plates out
l'r ferentially. It is a serious problem only when there is accldental
Kross contamination which may be caused by anodic dissolution of
f rrous alloys or their long exposure to the electrolyte in an
nnplated state.
llL
th
w re in equilibrium.
r u1 ?
llr. lniiraham - On close examination of the diagram you can see four
r n 1 cl phnses and one gas phase.
This is an invariant point in the
r .YHt.um and it occurs near a temperature of 1050K. When the
W1ll llL
~211
DISCUSSION
Dr.Ingraham - Not yet. The first copies will be available when the
proceedings of this conference are published.
Dr.Wallace - The session this afternoon has involved quite wide
thermodynamic coverage. You will recall that there are several
techniques recommended from text books for obtaining thermodynamic
information. There are electrical methods, methods which depend
upon chemical reactivity, partition coefficient methods, freezing
point depressions or boiling point elevation methods for obtaining
thermodynamic data which are nothing more than specific kinds of
phase equilibria. All of these classic methods for obtaining
reliable thermodynamic information have been involved in the
discussion here this afternoon.
'.'II
PANEL III
APPLICATIONS OF THERMODYNAMIC PRINCIPLES
TO METALLURGICAL SYSTEMS(continued)
Chairman
Dr.J.Alfred Berger
Chairman, Metallurgical Engineering Department
University of Pittsburgh
1.
2.
3.
4.
,o.
Discussion
PANEL III
Dr.Berger, Chairma
THE
G.R.St.Pierre
The Ohio State University
INTRODUCTION
At the 1964 Symposium on Process Simulation and Control held in
conjunction with the Annual Meeting of AIME, the author suggested
that free energy balances could be as useful to the process analyst
as enthalpy balances 1. The intent of this paper is to extend the
discussion of the free energy balance as a representation of
metallurgical processes. The initial part of the paper will review
the criteria for spontaneous changes within reacting systems. The
latter part of the presentation will outline the methods of computing
free energy and entropy balances for processes .
Although the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be stated in a
number of equivalent forms, the best known of which are the Clausius,
Kelvin-Planck and Caratheodory statements 2, the following choice has
been made for the purpose of this presentation: 'Within an isolated
system, internal energy must remain constant and entropy must tend
toward a maximum value' . The previous statement is a combined statement of both the First and Second Laws. To use the principles
contained in it, the definitions of isolated systems, internal energy
and entropy have to be fully understood. An isolated system is one
which can interact in no manner whatsoever with its surroundings.
Inte rnal energy, E, is all of the energy within a system other than
its stored potential energy relative to a force field and its motion
as a body. Entropy, S, is defined in terms of the addition of entropy
to a system:
dS = - (reversible).
T
G.R.ST.PIERRE
dE = TdS - PdV + 2,pdn .
(1)
<(/
Equation (1) allows for the calculation of the change of the internal
energy of a system along a reversible path. The final term 24dn.
includes all mass and work terms other than work of expansion. If
the system is open with respect to addition or removal of mass, then
24dn would include a series of terms:
(2)
"i (~ 0
S,V,N
~~i)
S,P,N -T
":w
~:,)
E,V,N
~:J.P.N
21
s 1 = f - dE
1 T
F2 - F1 =
A2 - A1
VdP -
=- f2
1
,.2P
+ j
1 T
dV
s21 SdT
PdV -
.r21 SdT
(4)
(5)
(6)
lii
Since,
From the Second Law, dSA must be >o and disallowing negative
values of T it follows that dFA + dF 8 <o for any spontaneous change
which does not result in a net change in P and T4 Similar arguments
may be made to establish that :
(DE)s,v <o
(lOa)
(d.H)P,S <o
(lOb)
(dA)T,V <o
(lOc)
(dV)E,S
<o
(lOd) .
(11)
x)
X.
l'iF =
(1
-A) Fe0( 2 ) +
(l -
x)
The superscripts (1) and (2) designate the initial and final state,
respectively. From the definition of activity, 1 1 +RT ln a 1,
equation (12) becomes
6F =
+ RT { X1nX + (1 -
x)
ln ( 1 - A)}
and
f~r
(13)
6F = +1940,X + 5500 {
X1ogX
+ (1 - ,X) log (1 -
x)}
(14)
~~
Arn=
0.31
\l
(15)
G.R.ST.PIERRE
+2000
+ 1800
+ 1600
+ 1400
(llOO) (1100,
(llOO)
(llOO) (1100)
(1100)
+1200
+ 1000
+800
+600
.,
+400
ii:
0
..J
+ 200
<I
<(
..:-200
~il 1
-400
-600
1;;::
''"
-800
~,
1000
'iii
0
.2
.4
.6
X, EXTENT of
REAC~ON
.8
1.0
Fig.1
The value of X at the minimum satisfies equilibrium within such a
system at the particular temperature and pressure.* However, it is
important to note that there are many states other than the
equilibrium state for which6F is negative and the criterion of
spontaneous change is satisfied. For example at X = 0. 2, 6F = -812
and at X = O. 4, 6F = -849. Both of these states are energetically
more favorable than the initial state; however, the system could
never move to X = 0.4 from its initial state because that would
require that the system pass through its equilibrium position. This
illustration serves t Q.. point out ' the existence of lower free energy .
states for the system other than the equilibrium state. To determine
whether or not a particular change is possible it is necessary to
establish that the final state has lower free energy than the initial
* That is, it satisfies solution of the equilibrium constant
expresstion, K = Pc 02/ Pco. 5
2110
(16)
where the first two summations must be taken for each component
within each input phase and the second two summations must be made
over each component of each output phase. Although equation (16)
appears complicated, it is quite simple to apply. One of the most
import ant ways of simplifying the computations is to adopt standard
states as follows:
( 1 ) For condensed phases, the standard state of each component is
the pure component in its equilibrium structure at one atmosphere
pressure and the temper ature in question;
The terms,
(F~ ~ H~)
m st
uur
1(118
G.R.ST.PIERRE
Illustrates the simplicity of this function:
r cop
-T
cpdT
0
J [J
0
-dT
T
T
Cp0 dT
dT
(17)
T2
F T
tt0)
0
does not
(18)
111111' I.hi
l{lLl:I
OU
A11.
,I
( 11,
02
(19)
(20)
where
2n 1 + n 2 - 1
1 - n1
If it is proposed that 6H
+0.9 log-_9_)
n 2 + .1
n 2 +. 1J
(21)
0.9
1. 0
1. 45
1. 90
2.80
+976
+201
-274
-1544
-2324
-3324
:Iii rn.
' L 11
G.R.ST.PIERRE
TABLE I
Input
1 mole Fe
at 1200K
n 2 mole CO at 1200K
at 1200K
(2n 1
n 2 - 1) mole CO at 1200K
(1 -
n 1) mole
2n 1
Pco
atm
Pco
co 2
at 1200K
n2 - 1
n1 + n2
1 - n1
Pco 2 = - nl + n2
'
co,}
(1 - y) mole Fe(T)
y mole FeO(T)
(0.1 + y) mole CO(T)
(0.9 y) mole C0 2 (T)
(1200)
F g. 2.
Phn3
tooo 0 c
and
G. R. ST. PIERRE
:,IJ(J
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
47
C.W.McCoy
Senior Research Scientist
A.F.Kolek
Metallurgical Technician and
F.C.Langenberg
Director
Process Research and Development Laboratory,
Crucible Steel Company of America, Pittsburgh, Pa.
I NTRODUCTION
Stainless steels are iron-base alloys containing 12 to 30%
chromium. These steels are normally classified as austenitic,
ferritic or martensitic. The major divisions are the 300 series
with nickel-stabilized austenite, the 400 series that are either
ni ckel-free or contain up to 2. 5% nickel, and the 200 series in
which some of the nickel has been replaced with manganese and
ni trogen. The carbon content of stainless steels is usually less
t han 0.12% and in many grades is less than 0.07%. Silicon is
normally present up to 1% maximum. Supplementary alloying elements
us ed in some stainless grades would include molybdenum, columbium,
titanium, copper and aluminium.
In 1964, over 1,500,000 tons
have been cast. The production
over two-thirds of the chromium
St ainless steels also represent
chr om i um, manganese and iron. The oxides of these metals become
pnrt of t h slag. The partial recovery of chromium and manganese
. fl'O m t h R]ng by silicon during the reduction period (before slag-off)
l 11 11 . iH1ttry fol'
on mi u l op ration. Aft er slag-off or re ladling,
I. ht IH 1LI, tu 'fl11l 11 l11 !1' 1111 <1 1 o. R ond Hl o.g and t; apped.
VIII
1
2
- M +-
y-
o2 (g)
(1)
M.
~ - M 0
y
xy
(2)
p
02
1/2
APPLICATION OF
THERM~HEMICAL
DATA
and
K2
(4)
=----a X/Yp
M
1/2
o2
(5)
[%] f
02
1/2
and
K2 = - - - - - - - -
(6)
02
(7)
K2 f
x/y
M
or
ln (
fV
x/y
M.
_',b l
(8)
= -RTlnK,
But 6 F0
ln
ln
or
r~x/')
- -
+ ln
!'II
and by substituting,
(9)
re&
r~xl~
--
(6
=
H~
- 6
H~)
RT
C.fM
.f0)
( fCCG
(6
+
s~
- 6
s~)
C 0)
- -x ln ( f M.f. f
y
MMM
(10)
log
o/<Mx/~
-o/
(Constant) 1
T
+ (Constant) 2
(11)
a.76
(12)
. 252
TABLE I
Stmunary of Chemical Analyses and Measured and calculated Temperatures
Temperature (K)
Alloy Analysis (%)
Tes t
:..>
Sample
Cr
Ni
--
Tm
Cale. by
Eq. ( 12)
Cale . by
Eq. (13)
Tc
Cale. by
Eq . (15)
1863
1898
1861
1895
1861
1895
1861
1895
2
3
2
3
2
3
Tm,
Measured
Tc'
T -T
m c
T -T '
m c
T -T ''
m c
A-1
1
2
0.42
0.30
9. 16
8.96
B-1
1
2
3
0,33
0.23
0.16
8.95
8.48
8.06
4.13
4.18
4. 22
1879
1914
1951
1883
1919
1955
1871
1905
1941
1867
1901
1937
-4
-5
-4
8
9
10
12
13
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0. 24
0.22
0 . 21
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.13
0.11
9 . 86
9.14
9. 12
8.58
8. 45
8. 42
7. 73
7.61
8.36
8. 42
8.37
8.40
8. 42
8.47
8. 68
8.61
1895
1892
1894
1928
1926
1927
1956
1955
1933
1933
1938
1949
1954
1953
1975
1994
1904
1905
1911
1921
1926
1925
1946
1965
1895
1896
1902
1913
1917
1916
1937
1955
-38
-41
-44
- 21
-28
-26
-19
-39
-9
-13
-15
7
0
2
10
-10
0
-4
-8
15
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
o. 18
9 . 50
9.16
8.97
8.59
8.57
8. 56
8.50
12.25
12.44
11.90
12. 16
12.33
12.37
12.09
1914
1916
1919
1939
1946
1947
1952
1961
1957
1954
1979
1988
1988
1997
1920
1916
1915
1939
1947
1946
1956
1908
1903
1903
1926
1933
1933
1943
-47
-41
-35
-40
-42
-41
-45
-6
0
4
0
-1
1
-4
6
13
16
13
13
14
9
B- 3
B-4
0. 18
0.18
0. 14
0.13
0. 13
0. 12
11
19
0
~n
1-C
1-C
~
o-:3
II
1-C
n
~
0
~
>
TABLE I (continued)
Temperature (OK)
Alloy Analysis (%)
Test
Sample
Cr
Ni
Tm
Measured
Tc,
Cale. by
F,q.
B-5
:"
.:.J.,
.:::.
B-6
0.19
9. 11
2
0.19
8.97
3 \ 0.16
8. 97
4
0.14
8.53
5
0.13
8.42
6
o. 12 8. 38
0.098 7.85
7
8 , 0. 095 1.75
9 . 0.090 7.58
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
o. 18
0.14
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.082
0.078
0.076
9.32
9.14
8.65
8.55
8.49
7.83
7.69
7.73
( 12)
Tc
Cale. by
Tc
Cale. by
(13)
Eq. (15)
Eq.
Tm-Tc
16.46
16.27
16.54
16.40
16. 50
16.56
16.62
16. 63
16. 52
1877
1882
1882
1907
1910
1909
1955
1955
1950
1949
1948
1968
1978
1986
1995
2013
2015
2019
1897
1895
1914
1924
1931
1939
1956
1958
1962
1880
1879
1896
1907
1913
1922
1938
1940
1944
-72
-66
-86
20.29
20.18
20.07
20. 02
20.05
20. 27
20. 21
20.11
1883
1885
1921
1921
1923
1948
1949
1950
1961
1987
1999
2009
2008
2035
2040
2044
1893
1920
1932
1941
1940
1965
1969
1974
1873
1898
1911
1920
1919
1943
1947
1951
-78
-102
-78
-88
-85
-87
-91
-94
-71
-76
-86
-58
-60
-69
Tm-Tc'
Tm-Tc''
-20
-13
-32
-17
-21
-30
-1
-3
-12
-3
3
-14
0
-3
-13
17
5
6
-10
-35
10
-13
10
1
4
5
2
-1
-11
-20
-17
-17
-20
-24
C')
"';;;:::"
0
.><
?"
:;i
;
~
:;i
C')
I
Q
2
-4
-32
- 42
-73
-89
0
4.18
8.47
12. 36
16.51
20.27
Eq . (13)
2
9
-3
-1
-18
-16
Eq . (15)
2
13
5
12
0
2
Alt hough equation (12) was derived from data obtained from
xper i ments with plain chromium steels, it was also applied to
Htainl ess steels containing nickel. Richardson 4 speculated that
high concent rations of nickel in steel would increase the carbon
nctivity coefficient. Fuwa and Chipman 5 later published data in
which t hey meas ured the effect of nickel on the activity coefficient
. o carbon for nic ke l contents between zero and 30%. Simkovich and
MoCoy 6 r 1l atod the Hilty experiments in systems containing up to
'0 u r 1 ut, 11 i It 1. Tnblos I and II show the results. The column
., 11>
tg,
tg,
log
o/tCrj
--
( %
-13,800
T
(13)
+ 8. 76 + 0. 012 [%Ni]
+ 8.76 + o.012[o;.Ni]
x
y
log tNi
Cr
(14)
:,r n
o/r
Differences between the experimentally measured values of log %Q
and those calculated by equation (13) are -x/y log f~i and the
slope of these values versus [o;.,Ni] is ye ~i = -0.004 as shown in
Fig.1 so that the final form of the relationship is:
-13,800
+8.76 +0.016[o;,Ni]
(15)
0
~
.,.01101.,.
L'...._j
-0.050
"'
.!:!
<I
-0.100
- 0. 140
0
10.0
5.0
15.0
20.0
WEIGHT PERCEN T NI
Fi~ .1 .
. 11'/
log
%Cr)
( %Q
-13,800
8
= T + 4. 21 [o/JU] + ' 76
(16)
The authors have recently begun similar work on the manganesecarbon-temperature and the manganese-nickel-carbon-temperature
relationships which are important in the Type 200 stainless steels
where manganese is also oxidized concurrently with carbon during the
oxidation period.
!ii
f[
TABLE III
~mp le
Mn
Tm
Measured
Tc
Cale. by
Eq. (17)
Temperature
Deviation (K)
Tm-T c
~~
Y.A
1
2
0.30
0.23
3.99
3.47
1916
1927
1901
1933
15
-6
1i!B
1
2
3
0.77
0.63
0. 44
10.70
10. 01
9.59
1908
1958
1983
1912
1945
2029
-4
13
-46
MC
1
2
3
0. 59
0. 46
0.32
7. 81
6.97
6.77
1926
1972
2002
1900
1933
2021
26
39
-19
1-i .
MD
1
2
3
4
0.95
0.79
0. 71
0.59
10.60
9.88
9.64
9.09
1841
1880
1911
1927
1859
1886
1906
1937
-18
-6
5
-10
ME
1
2
0.17
0.11
2.22
1.49
1889
1908
1896
1906
-7
2
MF
1
2
3
4
0.51
0.47
0.37
0.30
6.26
5. 88
5 . 51
5.09
1880
1908
1930
1941
1881
1886
1929
1962
-1
22
1
-21
MG
1
2
3
4
0.59
0.54
0.46
0.41
7. 26
6.97
6.42
5.82
1Cl72
1902
1916
1922
1882
189.4
1913
1917
-10
8
3
5
~
~
~
::z::
H
(")
~
0
~
>
IUli IT
~
Te~
'Ie;:perattire ( :K}
A:lqy Ana lys is ( %}
Sac11le
Mn
Ni
Ta
Measured
"
Tc
Cale . by
T ,
Ca le~ by
( 17)
Eq. (18 )
F.q .
Tm-Tc'
~
~
1
2
3
0.67
0. 59
0. 35
9.07
8 . 57
4 . 58
2.19
2.1 9
2.21
1878
1894
1890
1905
1922.
1897
1891
1906
1885
-27
-28
-7
-13
-12
l\
2
3
0.60
0. 53
0.43
7.09
6.76
6.27
2.10
2.11
2.15
1853
1883
1900
1872
1891
1924
1857
187'7
1907
-19
-8
-24
-4
6
-7
>
'.'9
1
2
3 .,.,
0.62
o. 45
0. 27
7. 35
6.48
4.12
3. 67
3.80
4.14
1847
1894
1905
1874
1921
1935
1848
1894
1906
-27
-27
-30
-1
0
-1
1
2
0.18
0.14
2. 53
2.16
4.07
4.02
1889
1909
1915
1938
1889
1900
-26
-29
0
9
MN
1
, 2
3
0.62
0.57
0.40
7.65
7.14
5.80
6. 10
6.31
6. 38
1835
1858
1884
1833
1886
1922
1840
1845
1875
-48
-28
-38
-5
13
9
MO
1
2
3
0.20
0 . 19
0.18
2.86
2. 82
2.48
6.08
6.10
6. 08
1878
1883
1878
1919
1928
1910
1878
1887
1869
-41
-45
-32
0
-4
9
1
2
0. 44
0.38
5.59
5.31
6.19
6. 24
1848
1878
1889
1913
1850
1872
-41
-35
-2
6
MK
ML
g
0
MM
MP
(')
~
~
::>=:
>
~
~
(')
I
c;'l
%Mn -6440
40
loQ " g_
=-r-+1.51
20
11~10
..
6
4
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
_.__~
5.4
5.5
I
4
TKELVIN X IO
Pct. M!!
Pct.
log (:)
-6,449
(17)
- - - + 4. 51
T
Table III also shows the good agreement between the experimentallymoasured temperatures and those calculated by equation (17) .
Preliminary experiments in the manganese-carbon-nickel system are
s hown in Tables IV and V. As in the chromium-carbon-nickel system,
H gnificant deviations from the behavior of the nickel-free system
wor noted, as seen by comparing the measured temperatures versus
Lh temperatures calculated by equation (17). Again in this study,
111:1
of the Fuwa and Chipman data 17 for the correction of the carbon
. u L i vi~y coefficient caused by nickel according to equation (10)
m1Lcl the two sets of data consistent:
o/.tMTI) --6,440
( .%f
T
4.51 +
o. 012
[o/<.Ni]
(18)
Equation (18)
2.16
-19
3.94
6.18
-28
-38
-4
+l
+3
4.51
(19)
REACTIO~
PERIOD
'.O:!
2 (Si0 2)
slag
(21)
\
Variable Speed Elect ric Molar (Riohl Ar191e Drivel
Quartz
Tube
()
:El
==
(')
Pyrex. Gloss
Sholl
1ef >
>:g
Ceramic
Top
:'.:>
,.;:..
.L'
94
t"'
~
>:g
()
~
Tronsile
L7
--..;:,,,r
>--- - - -- -- - -- --
Fig. 3.
- - -- - - -- 4 2 - f -
I
Cl
- -- - - -- -- - - -- --
--I
a [er] a(Si0 2)
(22)
(23)
W20.o.
rf
i 1.5.0 f~x...
. . ~----..
X~ x_xJL... .\
Ill
J
.5
10.0
r_l,,.--1-
'-t---t-
--'CrJ Heat
v
7B
0.80
-~ 55
-_."le,...Cr,__-
0.40~
5.0v
o0
0.20
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
Time , Minutes
Fig.4.
~I
8866
4. 887 - - - + O. 340 log [%Cr J
T
(24)
where
T = absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin
[rt.Cr] = equilibrium weight ,per cent chromium in the metal
[%Si] = equilibrium weight per cent silicon in the metal
V = slag basicity expressed as wt %Ca0/wt o/J)i0 2.
'
The agreement between the experimental
and the estimated values
of chromium in the slag predicted from equation (24) i~ shown in
Fig.5.
:~on
TABLE ' VI
Summary of Chemical Analyses, Temperatures and Calculated Final Slag Basicities
Chromium Slag-Metal Equilibrium Study
Final
[er]
Heat
in
Metal
(%)
~-=
....::
5S
5V
5W
5Z
6A
60
6E
6G
61
6J
6K
6L
6Q
6U
6P
11. 95
11. 05
11.14
11. 70
11. 74
11. 71
11. 66
11.30
11.81
11. 73
10.97
16.24
17.91
16.65
17.32
Final
[si]
in
Metal
(%)
[cao]
in
Slag
(%)
0.39
0.09
0.11
0.52
0.52
0.27
0. 32
0.12
o. 29
0.28
0.09
0. 27
0.80
0.16
0.32
37
30
35
30
35
30
40
30
50
50
30
35
30
30
30
[A1203J
in
Slag
(%)
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
(CaF 2)
in
Slag
(%)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
(Si0 2 )
Originally
in
Slag
(%)
Final
(Si0 2)
in
Slag
(%)
Final
(Cr)
in
Slag
(%)
Temperature
(OK)
63
55
50
55
50
55
45
55
35
35
55
50
55
55
55
50.3
42.8
44.9
47.7
46.0
46.8
45.6
45.2
43.6
43.6
42.4
37.8
49.3
47.1
44.1
10.0
14.9
10. 2
7.6
5.4
10.0
5.1
13. 0
4. 1
4.1
14.0
15.6
8.5
19.8
9.8
1839
1872
1839
1855
1805
1900
1878
1864
1866
1865
1914
1972
1814
1814
1889
Calculation,
Final
Basicity
>
1-t
a
~
1-t
0. 71
0.564
o. 63
0.582
0.715
0.56
0. 75
0.539
0.89
0.89
0.595
0.745
0.524
0.37
0.637
i
~
==
1-t
~
~>
c
G>
:. 20.0
CJI
iii 15.0
.5
i 10.0
Cr = 11.0 - 18.0%
Si = 0.10 - 0 .80%
Temp = 1800-2000 K
J:!
5.0
u"
= 0.4- 0.9
<t
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Fig.5.
...
.on
949
1.118 + -
(25)
;!,11 l
~ --I
14.00
c
~12 . 00
&.
.;io.oo
en
.~
8.00
~ 6 .00
.:
u 4 .0 0 W J 1 1 J t t 1 1 . i
2.00 ~
o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2 .00
. .
( %Cao + %MgO)
%Si0
Slag Bas1c1ty,
2
Si
Cr = 15.0%
Temp= 1825 K (2826 Fl
=0.40%
810.00
~
a..
,!;;
5.00
E
~
.:
0.50
1.00
1.50
2 .00
.
( %Cao + %MgO)
Slag Basic1ty,
%S i 0
2
'
(26)
The left side of the equation represents the energy input into the
furnace. A, B and C are the respective heats evolved when one per
cent of the element in solui ion per ton of charge is oxidized, and
concentration changes in the brackets are expressed as weight per
cent. E is the electrical energy input during the oxygen blow. The
factor 70 represents the heat 1 of fusion of a ton of steel and m is
the fraction of the bath stiil solid at the start of the oxidiz ing.
period.
The right side of the equation represents the energy output of
I
the system. Cp is the 'apparent heat capacity' of the molten bath
plus the furnace on a per-ton basis. The temperature change during
oxidation is given by the differ ence between the final t emp rature
272
UJ
UJ
....----....-----.------,.------....----....----~
1-
Ul
1-
......
U)
1Ul
(.)
~
ii:
UJ
!q
:::E
~
UJ
U)
~ 0
II:
(.)
UJ
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
Fi g.8.
(28)
Estimated Cr
Temperature Metal Composition (%) Slag Composition (%) in Slag.from
Equation (24)
v
Cr
F'
Cr
Si
K
(%)
1824
1834
1830
1806
1806
1812
1829
1817
2824
2842
2834
2792
2792
2803
2833
2812
17.62
16.50
17.65
17.50
17. 15
17.59
18.60
18. 62
1. 73
1. 81
1. 90
0.24
0.39
0. 18
0.38
0.42
0.45
0.42
o. 50
1. 68
1. 78
1. 59
1. 59
1. 48
1. 89
1. 90
2.30
2. 98
2.16
3. 00
2.70
2.30
1. 41
1. 25
1.82
1. 23
1. 08
1.35
1. 64
1. 59
0.025.....----.--~--~--~-~
OBS.Q=.OOIOt.9082 C.ALC.Q
2cr=.0016
01
lZ 0.020
l&J
a:
l&J
11..0.015
~
::c
~
l&J
31: 0.010
0
l&J
&:
~0.005
m
0~--~--~----'-----'----'
J11 (
.9.
Act,nnl v rsus
O.OO!S
0.010
0.015
0.020 0.025
CALCULATED WEtGHT PERCENT Q
l" 11 H
'.l'il1
23 , 24 )
F.C.LANGENBER~
'I'/ '/
C.W.McCO~,
1.
- 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
. 7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
...
'
','/II
l Proceedings ,
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21 .
22 .
23.
...,'
'
These are topics about which I should like to talk this morning:
pressure -- composition diagrams , (2) the factors that influence
the mode of vaporization and determine the vapor pressure of a
substance, (3) the steps i n a vaporization study and (4) finally, a
few suggestions of practical uses.
(1 )
P. W.GILLES
establishes the nature of high temperature reactions. It provides
data on the vapor pressure which establishes the ultimate limit on
the use of a material in a high temperature system. Finally, a
vaporization study may be useful in the preparation of new compounds
or in the preparation of single crystals. Professor Alcock 2
mentioned yesterday that there is no better way to obtain the partial
molal free energies of components in solutions then by carrying out
a vaporization study, and with that I surely agree. Some industrial
processes are interrelated with vaporization reactions. Among these
can be named metal preparations, vapor plating and metal purification.
Some reasons for vaporization studies are summarized in Table I.
TABLE I
Purposes of Vaporization Studies
1. To obtain for simple gaseous substances thermodynamic data
essential for chemical binding theory.
2. To obtain thermodynamic data for refractory phases.
I
'
VAPOR
Fig.1 .
Ideal Solution
Now, if a system does not show ideal behavior, it may exhibit the
h havior shown in Figure 2. In such a system there is no intermediate
ompound, but partial solubility of the components occurs. Again the
total pressure is plotted as a function of the solid composition for
t.h upper curves and of the gaseous composition for the lower curves.
AL , low pressures only vapor is present. At temperatures and pressures
Cul ling within the area at the upper left which is labeled~ (solution),
th Rystem contains a variable composition solid solution phase of ~
111 P!. Similarly at the upper right, mutatis mutandis. In the upper
c:cntrul 1)1\r'L Lw Holid phas , each saturated with the minor component,
1xlr1t. In 10111ll hrlu m. 'l'h cq111l j br 1um phases in the lenticular areas
111 1
ow 1
P.W.GILLES
A (8-SAT'D SOLN)
0
A(SOLN l
8 (SOL Nl
8 ( A-SAT'D SQ' N)
VAPOR
Fig.2
at the ends of tie-line. Along the horizontal line three phases, ~
saturated with ~. vapor of composition f and ~ saturated with A. exist
in equilibrium.
In Figure 3 the same areas are shown, but both solid solutions
yield vapors relatively richer in component ~ Fractional distillation of the system represented in Figure 3 produces pure ~ in the
distillate and pure ~ in the residue. Regardless of the initial
composition, partial vaporization always prod.uces a residue richer
in ~ If the residue is a single phase, its equilibrium pressure is
less than that of the initial sample.
Fractional distillation of the system shown in Figure 2 causes the
composition of the residue to change toward ~ if the original solid
composition lay to the left of the point ~. and toward ~ if to the
right. Again if the residue is a single phase, its equilibrium
pressure is smaller than that of the initial sample.
0
2fJ4
B(SOLN)
A(SOLN)
B (A-SAT'D SOLN)
VAPOR
Fig.3
BW!-5A
A(AB-SAT D)
+
A(SOLN)
AB (SOl.N) AB (B-SA
AB (A-SAT[j
VAPOR
Fig . 4
tt111gle-phase regions. The vapor phase is at the bottom; the lenti'Ular ar as at the sides have the same significance as before, and
t.hoH in th
nter r pr sent equilibrium between the solid
11o l11L.Lon ' ompcmnd' und vapor solution with compositions given at
I. ht
1 111111
ul'
I\
LI 1 - 1 Im
P.W.GILLES
The intermediate phase is shown as a congruently vaporizing one.
At the minima in the curves in the center of the diagram, the vapor
and solid have the same composition, and vaporization of the phase
at this composition occurs at constant pressure without a cJmposition
change. Moreover, samples of the 'compound' with different
compositions produce a vapor relatively richer in the component which
is in excess compared to that at the minimum, thus causing the
residue to approach the composition of the minim1.p11. Again the
horizontal lines join the compositions of the three phases in
equilibrium with one another.
B
(AB-SATD B (SOCN)
A
A
(AB-SATO)
AB
(SOLNl
(SOLNl
AB
(A-SATO)
AB
(B-SATOl
AB
+V
VAPOR
Ne
Fig.5
Figure 5 shows the incongruent vaporization of an intermediate
phase. The left and right sides and the bottom of 'the diagram
have the same significance as previously. The vapor in equilibrium
with the 'compound' is always relatively richer in component ~ than
the condensed phase. Accordingly, as vapor is removed, the residue
must grow richer in component ~ Vaporization of 'compound' ultimately produces the~~ solid SO'lution. Fractional distillation ~of .
any sample ultimately produces pure solid ~ and pure gaseous .
Figure 6 shows the results of an extensive experimental investigation on the titanium-oxygen system carried out in our laboratories
by Drs.Q.D.Wheatley, P.G_.Wahlbeck, H.F.Franzen, K.D.Carlson and
286
a-Ti
a+/3
TiO
Ti 20
+
VAPOR
Q2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Ti 20 3 rTi30,
+
+
Ti3 0 5
fr;,p.,
Ti 3 0 5
TiO
+
Ti 2 0 3
TiO
m,
Ti 20 3
Ti20
f3
------
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
_./
1.8
2.0
o/r;
Fig . 6
Mr.G. D.Stone. In the titanium-oxygen system numerous condensed
phases h~ve been identified, and some are shown in the figure . The
most important of these are Tio, Ti 2o 3, Ti 3o 5, and Ti0 2. Between
Ti 30 5 and Ti0 2 are many phases discovered by Magneli and coworkers 3 4 5 whose compositions are described as Tino 2n-l These
nre only roughly indicated in the figure. The vaporization studies
have revealed that Tio and Ti 2o3 vaporize incongruently, always
producing a titlll'ium-rich vapor and a residuP containing the next
higher oxide. It is well known that Ti0 2 loses oxygen, and so also
do most of the complex phases. The congruently vaporizing compoHition has been shown to lie in the Ti 3o 5 solid solution region.
Th se f acts are summarized in the figure.
This kind of diagram does not of course reveal the nature of the
aseous species . It is only the composition of the gas phase which
s. indicated. In the titanium-oxygen system, the principal species
ov r the TiO phase are Ti(g) and TiO(g) ; over the Ti 2o3 phase, the
vr, 11 iriul gas is TiO(g); over the Ti0 2 phase, the principal gas is
o:x.yg 11, but Ti0 2(g) is appreciable. The principal species over the
m1 11 gr111 utly vo.p ril'.jng T o solid solution appear to be TiO and
3 5
llXYK\ n
~Lom11.
'!II'/
P.W.GILLES
SCHEMATIC
PRESSURE - COMPOSITION
PHASE
DIAGRAM
li
s~
l i,. S TV
VAPOR
03
SI Ti
Fig . 7.
ATOMIC
RATIO
(1)
us 2 (a) +
U\
US
(1)
U(i)
u(.Q l +us,.,.<1
us 2
U.f'
(sl
u2.s3 (1)
"':::>a:
"'"'a:"'
(1)
u3s5 <> +
a..
u (i)t v
_ ___......-- ._ u s Cal + v
2 3
..J
..:
....
....0
us,..(S) + v
VAPOR
1.0
1.5
1.67
s I u
Fig.fl
'1.11 11
2.0
3.0
gj v
1:1
P.W.GILLES
in establishing the mode of vaporization and the vapor pressure. If
a gaseous molecule of great stability exists, the condensed phase
of that same composition will tend to vaporize congruently with a
high pressure. The stabilities of the condensed phases are less
important, but to illustrate the influence of this factor, consider
the hypothetical case of a solid compound whose stability can be
altered. As the stability of the solid compound is increased
without a change in the stability of a gas phase, the vapor pressure
falls. Inasmuch as congruent vaporization occurs at a locally
minimum pressure, the tendency of the condensed phase to vaporize
congruently increases. Also its tendency to vaporize by decomposition
into the elements instead of into a gaseous compound increases .
Not only does the existence of a stable gaseous compound of a
particular composition tend to cause a condensed phase of that same
composition to vaporize congruently, but also its existence causes
other solid phases to tend to vaporize incongruently. Brewer 15
aites several such cases among the metal halides, ~ or example, the
titanium trihalide disproportionation. An interesting illustration
is provided by the work of Hildenbrand 16 on the lithium-aluminumfluoride system; Li 3AlF 6 (s) vaporizes incongruently primarily
because of the appreciable stability of the gaseous molecule LiAlF 4
which has no counterpart in the condensed phase. This discussion
also shows that the composition of the condensed phase, more
particularly its r elationship to the composition of gaseous molecules,
influences the vaporization mode and pressure.
In the absence of gaseous molecules, vaporization proceeds by
decomposition to the elements, and the heats of sublimation of these
elements become the most important factor in establishing the mode
of vaporization and the vapo~ pressure. In a binary system with
greatly different heats of vaporization for the components the usual
mode of vaporization is by preferential vaporization of the component
with the higher volatility. In extreme cases , the ultimate residue
is the other componept . A goocf example is the tantalum-boron
sys t em17 in which boron is preferentially vaporized from all the
phases. Another example is provided by the chromium-boron system
in which chromium is preferentially vaporized from all phases. If
the elements have comparable volatility, then a congruently
vaporizing compound frequently exists such as has been shown for
zircon!~ diboride1 8. The fact ors are t empered of course by t he
?.90
charact~ristics
Mt
I)!'
11
t reaction.
1.1 11
P.W.GILLES
5. Calculation of thermodynamic properties.
6. Deduction of molecular structures and constants.
7. Measurement of the kinetics of vaporization .
8. Establishment of the mechanism of vaporization .
These are listed in the order in which they might most reasonably
be accomplished, but rarely is this order followed in actual practice .
In the initial characterization of the vaporization process, one
first investigates possible reactions between the sample and other
parts of the system, which are numerous. A crucible is frequently
present; residual gas is present in a vacuum system; gases in a
transpiration experiment are not always pure; shields surround the
vaporizing s ample; and sometimes a suspension is present in the
apparatus. The apparatus should be designed and operated in such a
fashion so as to reduce or eliminate reactions between the sample
and the other ingredients. This initial characterization also is
used to establish which phases are congruently vaporizing and what
is the variance of the system. Simple, easy experiments can be used
to accomplish these investigations. The crucible material may be
changed; the apparatus may be altered; x-ray diffraction studies may
be employed; a mass balance can be attempted; a series of step -wise
vaporization experiments can be performed; chemical analyses can be
performed; and the closed crucible technique may be employed. The
results of the initial characterization of the chemical system are
usually presented in the form of a pressure-composition diagram
similar to those described previously.
After this study into the ,properties of the system has been accomplished, the gaseous specie ~ should be identified. The mass
spectrometer has been spectacularly successful in deducing the
vaporizing species 24 but other techniques may be used .
...
'
r: :;
MAGNETICALLY
ACTUATED
EJECTOR ROD
{-
~?~f-
--
.,
JOINT
TARGET MP<:;AZINE
TARGET RECEIVER
rnc~ACT::Eo=;;~
~
SHVHER i~ 1~~ ~fO; WATE::~~NG OUTLET
~
INDUCTION COtL
CRUC18LE ASSEMBLY
I
.
QUARTZ TABLE
PYREX WATER JACKET
PYREX
(I)
'
WATER
TO
COOLI N G INLET_ 1
OIFF'USION
.f
CON OE NSER
JOINT
B&S
~;
p~""-'---~ I
-1
GAUGE
~1' ~r ~
I ~1
'
'
~~
'""'" , :
O~:AL
WINDOW
J1!NT
Po
,'"'"'
f
f
'"'"T
'"'"T
~ltf'
) -.~ : ----~ ~:@+-.=.
PRISM
MAGNETIC SHUTTER
024t
W.WJ
,:c:~~
:.
Fig.9.
d.
,f)
:1
P.W. GILLES
0
L..L..J
SCA LE
IN CM.
~ f ..IOINT
SILA STI C
GA SKETS
WATER COOLED
SUPPOflT FLANGE
PRE SSUR E
GAUG E .
TO DIFFU S ION Pl.MP
LIQU ID NITROGEN
COLO
CURRENT
CO NCENT~(ITOR
VACUU M
Fig.10.
SY STEM
TRAP
APPARAT US
14
:,!)
P.W.GILLES
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11J
12.
13.
14.
15.
...
Mat~rials,
200
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
P.W.GILLES
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
'
'l 111
G.R.Fitterer
Distinguished Professor, Metallurgical Engineering and
Director of the Thermodynamics Center, University of Pittsburgh
imr
ion
G.R.FITTERER
has been a tremendous number of laboratory experiments which have
produced considerable reliable thermodynamic data. However, there
are a surprisingly few engineers who are currently using this
information to develop new materials or new processes.
In other fields of science this procedure has become known as
the 'spin-off' of scientific discoveries into useful commercial
products. Fortunately, there is no need today for one to wait for
new data in order to initiate many of these developments. Much
useful information has been waiting for its commercial application
for many years.
The scientist has already done a good portion of his job and has
furnished s with more information than we can use for some time.
One should not expect the scientist to visualize our needs. Instead,
the engineers must anticipate the needs of commerce and direct the
'spin-off', accordingly.
Forty-one years ago, the publication of the text on Thermodynamics
by Lewis and Randall(l) marked the beginning of the applications of
this science. However, at that time, the amount at available data
was meagre and it was often necessary to perform costly pilot-plant
or full-scale commercial experiments in order to improve a commercial
process or to develop a new one. Today, much of the groundwork can
be done by careful thermodynamic calculations.
At this point, I would like to relate just a few experiences of
one who has in the past resorted to full-scale, commercial experiments for answers. However, thermodynamic principles and data were
kept in mind and used whenever possible.
This work began in 1926, when as a student at Carnegie Tech, I
was assigned a thesis on the Deoxidation of Steel with Silicon'
under the direction of Dr.C.H.Her}y, Jr., at the U.S. Bureau of
Mines <2 ). This was a p'a rt of a large program under his direction on
the 'Physical Chemistry of Steel Making' in co-operation with some
70 industrial firms.
In these investigations , the 'test tubes' were open hearth furnaceR
ranging in siz fro m 30 to 250 tons capacity .. Literally hundreds of
mm r 1ul hottLH f liquid Ht, 1 w.r st udi d tn rd r to d termine
t.h
:lllfl
LllmH.
= co
= 0.0022
This constant does not change much with temperature but because
f the CO gas evolution, the value of m is pressure sensitive .
nit
:101
G.R.FITTERER
At one atmosphere pressure, m, expresses the minimum amounts of
oxygen which one can expect to find in steel at the respective
carbon contents. Thus, at equilibrium with 1% carbon, a steel would
contain about 0.0022% oxygen. Similarly, a 0.10% carbon steel would
contain about 0.022% oxygen. Actually it is doubtful if this
equilibrium is reached for any length of time by any steel process.
Instead, much more oxygen is found in commercial steels for a given
carbon content.
TABLE I
Equilibrium in the Carbon - Oxygen Reaction in Liquid Steel
Year
Investigator
m = o/iQ x %Q
t 0c
o. 0022
1600
1600
1927
Le Chatelier< 3 >
Styri( 4)
Pierarct< 5)
0.0019
1600
1928
Field( 6 )
0.0023
1600
1931
0.0025
1650
0.0019
1600
0.0025 +
Variable
0.0022
1500
0.0033 +
Variable
0.0028
1600
1957
0.0022
1600
1963
0. 00186 to
0.00218
0.00245
1500 to
1600
1900 ~ . -
1912
1919
1934
1937
1938
1940
1941
0.002
....
,I
0.3
OBSERVED
REBOILED
m 0.00214
500# FeSi
0.2
"'k
a
0.02
%Q
% Si
0.01
0.1
10
0
TIME FROM SILICON
Fig.1.
20
30
ADDITION, MINUTES
:10:1
G.R.FITTERER
At this time in the heat, a carbon 'reboil' (i.e. a renewal of
the CO evolution) was observed. This point, as indicated in
Figure 1, was taken to indicate that the reaction had just exceeded
the Q + Q = (CO) equilibrium level. Thus, an analysis of carbon
and oxygen in these steels at this time was assumed to indicate the
equilibrium level.
Although the values were determined at different temperatures,
the average of these 14 (50 - 250 ton) commercial basic open hearth
heats indicated <3 ) that m = (o/<&) (o/i:Q) = 0. 0022. The point to be
made here is that selected data from commercial open hearth heats
can supply a fairly accurate indication of the equilibrium level in
high temperature refining reactions under controlled c.o nditions.
In fact, these commercial heats of 1930 have (more or less)
confirmed the later laboratory results as well as Le Chatelier's
1912 value,
In summarizing all of the work which has been done, we should now
consider that the equilibrium relations in the carbon and oxygen
reaction in liquid steels has been established for all time. We
are, however, not finished with this reaction, but will return to it
shortly.
The Silicon-Oxygen Reaction in Liquid Steel
All medium and high carbon steels are deoxidized with some element
such as silicon so as to prevent the Q-Q reaction from occurring
during solidification. This addition produces a steel which is
solid or free from 'blow-holes', which are caused by CO evolution.
A~.stated previously, a study of the Si-0 reaction in liquid
steel was my first assignment by Herty< 15Y.- The total silicon
content of a steel deoxidized with silicon is the sum of the silicon
which has combined with the oxygen to form Si0 2 and that which is
dissolved but uncomb ined with ol ygen in the iron. Obviously in 'the
study of the reaction
~i +
2Q
= Si0 2 (glass)
one must .analyze the stee~ for both the c ombined and the unc ombined
. silicon. Thus, it was necessary t o deve l op a special analytical
3CM
on rn d .
:w
G.R.FITTERER
-6.0
-5.5
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
04
LOG Kd-5.0
-4.5
04
-4.0
1500
Fig.2.
1600
1550
TEMPERATURE, C
1700
Investigators
Year
Method
1.
1928
250# heats
2.
1931
3.
1933
laboratory
4.
Chipman< 8)
1934 thermo.
calc*
o. 743
5.
1935
open hearth
1. 76
6.
Schenck &
Bruggeman< 27 )
Schenck< 28 )
1945
open hearth
1. 24
7.
1950
laboratory
8.
1952
laboratory
9.
1953
laboratory
1963
thermo.
calc
0.743
---
--
--
--
1. 34 3.60 10.6
1.60 3.00
5.30
2.8
1. 05 2.80
7.00
7.60
where
G.R.FITTERER
(riBi) (%Q) 2 = 0.72 ,x 10 5 at the melting point of iron according
to Kubaschewski
ilF 0 = 142,000 - 55T
Solid 510
0
(Cristobalite)
2
and Liquid
..:
Solid 510
(Tridymite)
2
and Liquid
f..
2000
'13stite and
Fayalite
Tridymite and
Fayalite
Fayalite
Fe25i04
15
0
100%
FeO
Fig.3.
20
40
6o
80
100%
5102
G.R.FITI'ERER
the same equilibrium analysis providing the temperature has not
changed. In using the oxygen lance*, the carbon reaction subsides
very quickly after the lance has been removed, for the same reason.
The practical usefulness of this discovery will be described
shortly but at this point, the thermodynamic significance of this
phenomenon must be discussed.
From the phase diagram, it is obvious that the activity of Si0 2
in the slag is unity along line A-C because it is in equilibrium
with solid Si0 2 , which is thus in its standard state .
llol Fraction, 510
O.l
0.2
l.O
0.3
Activity of 510
0.4
2
l5J6c
' '
0.6
'
'
o.6
"
.\l
o.4
Normal range of
canposition of acid
open hearth slags
0.2
0
i.o
Fig.4.
0,9
o.6
0.7
Mol Fraction, FeO
,,
o.6
O.S ~ao
Because of the fact that the carbon reaction ceases as. the slag
composition approaches this saturation line it was concluded several
A tube in which oxygen is
slag le vel.
for~ e d
:1 10
0.9
0.8
0 .7
0
ol
0.6
0.5
.................
0.4
10
15
20
~-~-~-~-~-~
25
WEIGHT "
Fig.5.
., Wh n
30
35
40
40
So<\
N 1H Lhn m 1
fni t 1 n.
:111
-
'
G. R.FITTERER
Schuhmann and Ensio< 36 ) studied high FeO-silicate slags with the
iron activity fixed at unity since the slags were melted in iron
crucibles in the gamma iron temperature range.
Their results are shown in Figure 5 where it may be seen that
the activity tends to follow the ideal or Raoult's law at high FeO
concent rations but beyond 20 weight per cent of Sio 2, the trend is
markedly below the ideal line.
SCHUHMANN
1.0
@ 1535C
@ 1600C
@ 1650C
0.9
o.8
0.7
0.6
a=N
Fe0 0.5
.... ......
.....
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
Fig. 6.
0.1
0.412345
0.2
:11 2
1.0
............
,
0...
0.5
' ...
... ...
'----'~~~-'-~-""-~---~.L-~'--~~_.__...
~
Nsio 2 --+-
.,,. 2-
...
' LIQUIDS'
SOLID Si02
CRYSTOBALI TE
Nsi02 ( 1600)
SATURATED
t C
1.0
LIQUID
1500
SOLID Si02
TRIDYMITE
LIQUID
1000
Fig.7.
0.2
0.8
1.0
The relationship of such lines with the phase diagram are shown
i n Figure 7 and it can be seen that the saturation mol fracti on for
i 0 2 has affected the activity of FeO in these slags. Also the
Ht epness of the saturation line or liquidus in the phase diagram
i ii the r egion of 1340C explains the COQlment by Schuhmann and
,naio that a variation of temperature within a range of 116 C
clo 1::1 not 1::1 m to affect the activity of FeO materially. Neither
cl A Lt 1Lff t th saturation concentration of Si0 2 very much.
:1 1:1
G.R.FITTERER
These three examples illustrate large scale thermodynamic
experiments which have established three equilibria and which have
been verified by labora~ ory experiments. However, excessive
concentration on the E!'Iact' level of equilibrium can produce a
sterile science.
'THE FORGO'ITEN EQUATION''
or
6 FR
= RTZnJ - RTZnK
The standard free energy is thus only a part of a larger and for
.some purposes, a more important equation. 6FR indicates the free
energy of a reaction which starts with the reactants at any activity
t o generate products at any activity with the reaction being
re f erred to the standard free energy. If the initial and final
st ates of the reactants and products respectively are unity, then
J = 1 and 6 FR = 6F 0
INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS
My upp al to t he ngineer or applied scientist is that principles
t,h nu ti n fr
nor gy, 6 FR, be given more consideration
wl11 11 <lnr 111111 wI Lil comm r e: II 1 pro <HR s.
Wit h i ts use, thermodynamics
lnv o lv i n~t
:1 1r1
G.R.FITTERER
becomes a more vitally important science, It describes the
characteristics of re '!.jtions which can be made to occur under a wide
variety of conditions. The standard free energy, 6F 0 , describes
one set of conditions which can be changed only by selecting
different standard states or temperatures .
Vacuum Degassing of Liquid Steel
Returning to the three examples used in this paper, Figure 8
illustrates the normal trend of the Q + Q reaction in liquid steel
in forming CO. The reaction for a 0.25% C steel with the usual
degree of oxidation at point J will tend to follow line J-K which
has the slope of
16
12
= 1. 33.
*EQUILIBRIUM
AT
ATMOSPHERE
0
A.
AFR = AF 2
2
+ RTlnJ
B.
AFR =AF~
1
+ RTlnJ
-4,150 \
PRESSURE
= -12,715 cal.
0 .04
= -4,150 cal.
1-
lf
0.03
w
Q.
z
~ 0 .02
>x
0
0.01
0.10
0.20
0.30
CARBON,
Fig.8.
0.40
AF 1 = RTlnK1
., _
= -22,764 cal.
0.50
0.60
PERCENT
G.R.FITTERER
0.05
.J
*C+ 0
AT ATMOSPHERE
PRESSURE
0.04
I-
Si+2Q AT
LIJ
<.> 0.03
a=
LIJ
a..
LIJ
(!)
>-
0.02
= -16,600
cal.
0.01
Fig.9.
G.R.FITTERER
saturation percentage of Si0 2 increases according to the phase
diagram and c<ft'r esponds to a decrease in FeO content in the slag of
some 12 weight per cent.
With a 50 ton heat and a six pe r cent slag weight this amounts
to an addition of approximately 720 pounds of FeO. This, together
with the action it creates , can account for the elimination of about
0. 30% carbon in the 50 ton heat .
In addition, steels in the acid hearth can be partially deoxidized
merely by chilling the slag from point C to D in F'igure 3 thus
precipitating Si0 2 from the slag . This can be accomplished by
reducing the fuel input.
With an excess of Si0 2 in the slag blanket as indicated at point
D and with excess oxygen in the metal, the oxygen will diffuse from
the metal upwards into the slag in an attempt to approach
equilibrium by passing from point D to A.
In this reaction, D is a function of J and A a function of K in
the re.action free energy equation. This procedure will reduce the
oxygen content to near the ~ - Q equilibrium. All of these
manipulations have been made successfully on conmercial heats .
In pr esenting this paper it is hoped that others may be
encouraged to seek thermochemical data from industrial processes
when they are not otherwise available . Some plant work is always
desirable in any case so as to properly define the important
problems and to identify the controlling reactions. Such
applications are not easy but it is rewarding to see them in
operation on such a large scale.
In the work of the new Thermodynamic Center at the University
of Pittsburgh it is planned to explore such applications whenever
possible but also t ~ determine fundamental data where vacancies exist. The bulk of our work will be at higher temperatures than
those which are usually reported and will involve a variety of
metallic and some refractory compound systems.
'
:120
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
G.R.FITTERER
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24 .
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
G.R.Fitter, Campbell
31.
32.
33.
34.
~emorial,
...
36.
37.
PANEL III
DISCUSSION
Dr.Berger - We will now open the session for the intra-panel
discussion. Dr.Fitterer, it seems to me that in this panel we have
thoroughly discussed many interesting applications of thermodynamic
processes. Dr.Gilles' discussion of some of the low pressure systems
and some of the effects we get by going to low pressures was very
interesting and yet it seems that much of the discussion this after noon was relative to vacuum degassing. Also, some of the reactions
of the metal-metal oxide systems will be bette~ understood as a
r esult of the experiment which he described. We will start with
Dr . St.Pierre.
Dr. St . Pierre - I would like to bring up a point with Dr.Langenberg
about the large error in the temperature difference which can be
produced by a rather small error in the interaction coefficient. We
we re just making some calculations and a 5% uncertainty in the interaction coefficient produces a 20 degree difference between the
ca lculated temperature and the observed temperature for the chromiumcarbon equilibrium. Even a two per cent error would represent about
a s ix degree uncertainty in the temperature.
Or.Langenberg - I think the point that Dr.St . Pierre makes is
exce l lent . The fact that a five per cent error in determining an
interaction parameter can cause a temperature deviation of 20 degrees
at 2, 000K is very important . Also, the errors in analysis for carbon at very low percentages is a problem which can lead to errors,
especially when you get down to less than 0. 03% carbon which is not
typica l of stainless steel blowing conditions .
llJ.Fitterer - Well , along that line, Dr . Langenberg, I was wondering
_:I!? '
PANEL III
metal oxide was unity in the oxygen impingement zone. If the slag
is not the pure oxide or is not saturated with the oxide, the activity
is less than unity. There was some German work done in 1961 where
the slags contained quite a bit of lime and fluorspar and the slags
were on the metal before blowing started; in this case, there was
not agreement with the other investigators who studied this system.
We feel this difference occurred because the activity of the
chromium oxide was not unity. The temperature difference is what
one would expect assuming that the oxide activity was less unity.
We have not studied our slags for spinel formation.
Dr.Fitterer - I think und~r the conditions that you and also Dr.Hilty
worked, this is a very important contribution, and I think it's
probably been verified. The only thing is that in more oxidizing
slags, you're liable to be affected by spine! formation. Your slags
were not too far from a neutral condition as far as acid and bases
are concerned.
Dr. Langenberg - They were essentially pure chromium oxide plus the
iron oxide which was formed concurrently. The slags would be
saturated with the chrome oxide, so the activity would still be
unity..
Dr.Fitterer - I'd like to ask Dr.Gilles what he's done on metallic
systems by his method.
Dr.Gilles - None of my students has worked on a metal since 1955 or
so when two of them measured the vapor pressure of cerium. That
work has not yet been completely analyzed because the free energy
function for gaseous cerium has not yet been available. Some of the
borides with which students have been working have many metallic
characteristics.
Dr. Fitterer - I watched your work with interest on metallic systems. .
with oxygen, and this is what I mean by being very important
relative to the vacuum degassing work.
~
DISCUSSION
investigations that in the commercial vacuum degassing processes
t here is a tendency to approach an equilibrium with a carbon monoxide
pressure of 100 millimeters. In other words, it' s very difficult to
get carbon-oxygen products which are below this pseudo-equilibrium
val ue equal to a CO pressure of 100 millimeters. If you plot carbonoxygen results for the various commercial degassing processes they
tend to level off at this value. Now, there probably are ways, and
we think we know some, that wil~ permit us to go below these values.
Ther e might be some disagreement on this because it is a highly
commercial field with very strong sales pressures depending on the
degassing process you have.
Dr.Ber ger - Dr.Langenberg, I'd like to ask you if you've carried
your work down to the very low carbon contents i n some of the
stainless materials. I know some of your curves stop around 0.06%
carbon, or might that be a proprietary question?
Dr. Langenberg - No, the data which you have in the paper is all we
have developed in these experiments.
Dr.Berger - Thank you. Now, I would like to distribute the
ques tions from the audience to the various participants, and then
we' 11 discuss them one at a time. I think we might start with
Dr.Gi l l es . He has one that's rather interesting,
llr. Gilles - This is not a question. It is an assertion . It comes
from Pr ofessor Chipman. I quote, 'Headline in Pravda. Distinguished
~cien t i st states - U.S. vaporizes congruently.'
(Laughter)
llr . Fitterer - I have three questions from the audience, all of which
are essentia lly the same. These are relative to my suggestion that
the activity of FeO in a silica saturated slag tends towards zero.
One of t he discussers states that aFeO cannot be equal to zero in such
slags. Let ' s put it this way. It is probable that the time element
i.e., t he rat e of diffusion in a very viscous slag is a controlling
fact or. Never t hel es s , heats ~n the acid furnace may be held upwards
t,o an hour, for example, wit hout a carbon reaction under a silica
Ho.t.urnt d slag. This is tr ue even with the silicon content under
n fuct, t h silicon reaction will r everse under these
0. 01%.
con cl It, I onH HO nl'l Lo nor n1:10 th silicon content . In all of the
1x1>1. l'l 1111 11 l.11 ll<1<l'lh1cl In Lh lri t)l\IJ 1 l, h 1.-1 11 n
nt nt of the metal
PANEL III
was under 0.01%. So, let's say that FeO behaves as if its activity
is zero under these conditions .
Dr.Berger - Does that answer the question satisfactorily to the
benefit of those who participated? Are there any further
discussions? Dr . st.Pierre .
Dr . St . Pierre - Two questions have been referred to me from th r!
audience. The first one is , 'Can the 6F of the reaction be w~ed in
general to calculate rates of re actions quantitatively? For example,
by the methods of thermodynamics of irreversable processes?' I
have to say no . In order to apply irreversable thermodynamics, it is
necessary to have all of the coefficients on the intensity gradients
within the system, and, of course, these are unknown for most
systems. However, the magnitude of the overall 6F {s some indication
of how fast we might expect a process to procede, so it is a
qualitative indication.
The second question is , 'How could knowledge of the free energy
balance be used to change processing procedures?' There is some
possibility that this can be done quantitatively. If a proposed
minor change in a process results in an increased dissipation of
free energy, all other things beirig relatively constant, the process
should procede a little faster. When the kinetics are not changing
drastically, that is , there are no changes in the kinetic processes,
an increase in the dissipated free energy should represent an
increased reaction rate.
Dr.Langenberg - The first question I have is from Mr.Burr, United
states Steel. 'Have we made any production scale studies on the
effect Of bath temperatur e at s! ag- off on chromium recovery?' From
equilibrium considerations, we would expect that the higher the
temperature, the poorer would be the chrome recovery. But. as you
know from your operating experie~qe, the higher the temperature, t ~e
more fluid the slag beco mes. This then becomes a kinetic considera~
tion which masks and overwhelmes any of the equilibrium conditions .
In fact, if you looked at the two equations, one representing
equilibrium, and the other which we developed from th~ 12 production_
heats you noticed that the sign in front of the temperature term was
different. In practice, the "higher the t emperatur e during the
r eduction. step, the bet t er is your .chrome recovery . However, you
f'
have to watch t he r fractories.
:!',II
DISCUSSION
Dr.Langenberg - The second question refers to the slides showing the
difference between the measured and calculated temperatures for the
chromium-carbon-nickel system. It asks 'what is the meaning between
the two degree difference at zero per cent nickel?' We are
referencing our work against the Hilty equation within two or three
degrees. Instead of listing our own constant which is only slightly
different, we went along with the Hilty values without concern for
the two degree error in temperature measurement. There was no use
developing a new equation for that slight difference since Hilty's
equation is already established in the literature and probably built
into several linear programs by steel companies that are using it.
, His second question is, 'Can you predict the composition changes
during iso-thermal evaporation of binary alloys? If yes, how?'
Well, _yes, s ure. Brewer and Rosenblatt have as a matter of fact
don pr cis ly that for metal phases containing oxygen. The data
Umt nrn r oq n1r cl in or,d r to mak an appropriate prediction are
l.hoHi
of my pn.p r.
PANEL III
Professor Hultgren has been asked, 'In measuring equilibrium
vapor pressures, equilibrium is established with the surface of the
sample. For non-stoichiometric samples the surface becomes more
depleted of the more volati'ie component. The result depends on the
relative rate of diffusion and evaporation. Can you comment on
this?' H~ recognizes the difficulty that all of us in vaporization
work recognize, and we do our best to ascertain first of all whether
surface impoverishment is causing difficulty. If the surface is
being depleted so as to cause departure from equilibrium, we take
steps to rectify the difficulty. The means that we use to establish
whether depletion of the surface is causing problems are several.
Most simply, one can observe the vaporization rate as a function of
the extent to which vaporization has already occurred. If the rate
is diminishing with the temperature, we know we're in trouble. One
sensitive means of indicating whether the rate is following is to
observe the vaporization in the mass spectrometer. Now, if there
are problems, several remedies can be used. First , one can stir the
sample occasionally. Second, he can change the proportions of the
two phases if there are two condensed phases present. Third, he can
change the orifice size in the crucible in order to estimate
appropriate corrections to be made for the effect with both orifices.
Finally, he can work with a sufficiently small orifice in some
circumstances so as to reduce the surface impoverishment to a
minimum.
Mr.Alex Simkovish from Latrobe Steel Company asks the following
question. _ 'From your pressure-composition diagram for the titaniumoxygen system, what was the oxygen pressure at which Ti0 2 began to
decompose?' The diagram that I drew was for a constant temperature.
It was not a quantitative diagram. The pressure at which Ti0 2
loses oxygen depends, of course, on the temperature. The feeling
that. I usually have is that i f one heats Ti0 2 in a vacuum to a
temperature in the neighborhood of 1200 to 1400 degrees centigrade,
appreciable oxygen losses
... occur. ,1
Dr.Berger - Are there any additional questions from the audience?
If not, I'd like to briefly summarize the program this morning by
saying that Dr.St.Pierre told us something about the theoretical
calculations of the Free ~nergy Balances and illustrated those v ry
effectively with laboratory applications.
PANEL III
PANEL IV
NEEDS FOR FUTURE APPLICATIONS OF THERMODYNAMICS
Chairman
1.
2.
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
D1A ttHt-d on
PANEL IV
Dr.Elliott
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the final session of the Conference,
and as you can see by your program, it is entitled 'Needs for Future
Application of Thermodynamics' . We have a panel of six people who
are eminently suited and able to point up what these needs are in
several specific areas. We hope to cover more than just those areas
as we get into the discussion area of the session.
On our Panel we have several college faculty members and several
people from the industrial world who are face to face with some
real problems of making things go even though they don't have all
the information necessary to make a complete and final analysis.
As one looks into the availability of information on phases and
reactions of interest to process metallurgy, it is clear that
we still do not have facts with regard to the thermodynamic
properties of many of them. In addition, it seems that any kinetic
study that we undertake is severely handicapped at the start for
lack of some important thermodynamic data. It is our responsibility
this afternoon to point out some of these areas that are critical to
the technology.
Our speakers today will mention directly and obliquely the areas
where these numbers are yet unknown. We would like the audience to
bring up issues where these numbers are known.
Dr.Charles E.May will speak on Requirements of Space Materials and
I think he has primary reference to thermodynamic information.
Dr.May.
Dr.Charles E.May
Head, High Temperature Chemi st ry Section
Lewis Research Center , NASA
CHARLES E.MAY
MELTING POINTS OF SOME REFRACTORY MATERIALS
M. P.,
OF
c
Ta
Mo
Nb
6600*
6120
5430
4710
4530
Th02
Zr02
Cr203
5970
4920
4410
M. P . ,
OF
M.P . ,
OF
4 TaC : l ZrC
Hf'C
Tac
ZrC
NbC
T1C
we
~~c
Mo2C
S1C*
7110
7030
7020
6380
6330
5710
5190
5170
5120
4870
4710
ThB4
5880
5500
5430
5400
5250
5180
4530
Hf'N
TaN
ZrN
T1N
5990
5600
5400
5310
HfB2
ZrB2
TaB2
T1B2
NbB2
WB
*SUBLIMES
Fig.1
melting poi nt of any known compound . Some of the other carbides
should also be considered . These materials have the properties of
metals with room temperature electrical conductivities greater than
some of the common metals . These refractories are not chosen for
space applications at present because many of their properties are
unknown . Their stability limits at high temperature are not
adequately known and the nature of their vapor species is for the
most part speculative . In short , there is a great need for a concerted investigation into the thermodynamics of these materials;
the results of such an investigation would allow these materials to
be considered for space applications .
A few additional comments should be made concerning these refractories . First, these materials have high heats of formation.
For this and other reasons, they should definitely be considered to
be compounds. However, for sqme of these materials, in particular
tantalum carbide, the optimum properties apparently occur at other
than the expected stochiometric composition. Figure 2 illustrates
this; tantalum carbide has a minimum magnetic susceptibility at
Tac 0. 8. Other proper.;t.ies are a'l'so a maximum or minimum at this same
composition. Thermodynamics might also give an insight into this
unusual situation .
Looking a bit further , one should note that the thermodynamics of
the pseud9-binary alloys . ~f the refractories would al s o be of much
interest. It has been reported that haf nium carbi de .and t antal um
carbide form an alloy with a high"er me l ti ng p i nt than hafni um
4
VOLUME
SUSCEPTIBILITY,
CGS
.8
.9
MOLAR RA TIO, C/T a
1.0
Fig.2
carbide, itself. Other examples of this type may also exist among
the refractories.
The second general topic to be discussed is the compatibility of
solids. The important item to be discussed here is the various
problems where the question of compatibility arises. One example
where two phases contact each other is in the strengthening of
materials; the well known method of precipitation hardening dates
back many years. However, there are other methods of strengthening
involving more than a single phase; the potentialities of some of
these are being investigated at our laboratory. One of these involves
TRANSVERSE SECTION
TUNGSTEN REINFORCED COPPER COMPOSITE COMPOSED OF 48.3 - 5 MIL WIRES
UNETCHE'D MAG:
Fig.3
:1:w
SOX
CHARLES E.MAY
the embedding of whiskers or fibres in a matrix in such a way that
the fibres will retain their high tensile strength. The systems of
most practical interest are, of course ; those for which strong
whiskers are available. The preliminary study at our laboratory is
being carried out for fine tungsten wire in a copper matrix . Figure
3 shows a photomicrograph of a test specimen.
Another strengthening method involves dispersion similar to the
SAP process for aluminium. The first metal investigated was nickel.
The strict SAP process would require submicron particles of nickel
oxide to be dispersed in submicron particles of nickel metal. Since
the oxide is soluble in the metal at elevated temperatures, a judicial
selection of another oxide had to be made; in this case, the choice
was alumina. Figure 4 shows some results; the successfulness of the
method is easily noted. Application of this method would require
the finding of a compatible oxide or a substitute for each metal of
interest.
STRESS FOR RUPTURE VS RECIPROCAL OF MEASURED
INTERPARTICLE SPACING IN Nl-Al 2 0, ALLOYS
10 HRS AT 1500 F
14
10
STRESS,
IOOO PSI
PURE NICKEL
.I
.2
.3
.4
.5
10
.6
P. ' MICRONS
Fig.4
Another example of"'two phases' in contact is in the containment
of a nuclear fuel in a matrix metal. Our selection of materials is
quite restricted in this case. The matrix must be a refractory and
the dispersed material is limited to the few compounds that act
as a nuclear fuel.
The final two phase problem is associated with coat i ngs . . It is.
true that, many times , th prob l m i nvolved is.J;ho Atab ility of t he
:MO
P.T.Stroup
Assistant Director of Research, Aluminum Company of America
P.T.SI'ROUP
and the subsequent behavior in the electrolytic production of
aluminum. The list starts with an oxygen ion and progresses
through stages of aluminate, oxyfluoride and aluminofluoride to
the fluoride ion.
TABLE I
Alumina Formula
Allmand
1924
Alo 2
Aluminate Ion
Pointelli
1940
Al204 -2
Alo 3- 3
Alumina Solubility
Frejacques
1949
AlumiIJ,ate Ion
Fedotier
1923
C0 2 Solubility
For land
1953
Co-ordination of 4
1950
Cryolite Eutectic
Boner
Treadwell
1940
Solid Solution
Griinert
1942
Al302Fl4-9
AlOF 5 - 4
Alumina Solubility
For land
1953
Solid Solution
Grunert
1942
A1F 4-
Co-ordination
Phase Diagram
Boner
Frejacques
1950
1949
Dissociation of AlF 6
Dissociation of AlF 6
Fi:irland
1953
For land
1953
Fedotier
1932
Drossbach
1934
Al0 2F 2- 3
AlOF 2
Al20# 4-2
AlOF3 - 2
Al 2F9 - 3
AlF - 2
5
Al2F11.5
AlF 6 3
F
Ionization
Dissociation
From this wide choice Foster and Frank 5 have selected Alo 2 and
AlOF 2- to be the most accepta~\e from a thermodynamic approach ~~~g
Temkins 6 formulation"for the activity of a component in an ionic
melt from cryoscopic data. The log of activity of cryolite from
several ionization patterns in the cryolite-alumina system was
plotted as a function of temperature and the species Alo 2 and AlOF 2showed the closest similarity to the slope for the cryoscopic heat
of fusion. The presently. favored mechanism for solution of alumina
in molten cryolite. is:
Frank and Foster 7 identified the ions that carry the current in
the electrolysis of alumina in cryolite by transport experiments
employing the radioactive tracers sodium 24, fluorine 18 and
aluminum 26, and following migration across semipe rmeable membranes
of highly sintered alumina or hot pressed boron ni t r ide. Substantially all the current was carried by the sodium ion from anode to
cathode. About 1% of the c'urrent was carried from cathode to anode
by an anion in which the fluorine to aluminum ratio was 2 to 1. The
oxyfluoride ion, AlOF2, was suggested as that anion .
The simplest explanation for the production of metallic aluminum
at the cathode requires a reaction between the discharged sodium ion
and some aluminum containing species , such as AlOF 2 -. A more positive
i dentification of this and other ionic species may some day be accompl ished by Raman effect studies of molten cryolite if a suitable
container can be developed for such experiments.
A,lmost nothing is known concerning the electrode reaction at the
an ode in the Hall process so much study is needed. The predominant
product is carbon dioxide mixed with varying amounts of carbon
monoxide. It is thought by most investigators that carbon dioxide
is the primary product and any carbon monoxide is formed by reaction
of carbon dioxide with carbon, aluminum or sodium in the form of a
vapor, mist, fog or suspension. This behavior is quite important
commercially because such a reaction means a loss of aluminum and
a lower current efficiency.
Another area of interest in the aluminum industry is concerned
with carbothermic smelting recently reviewed by Stroup 8. Thermodynamic calculations and experience have taught that all the major
oxide s in bauxite except zirconia are reduced by carbothermic
smelting before alumina is reduced, as shown in Figure 1 where the
free ~nergy of formation of these oxides is shown as a function of
temperature and indicates the temperature at which metal formation
might be expected from carbon reduction. In practice, the oxides
rlo not behave as simply as predicted. This is partly caused by the
r rnution of carbides , i nt rrnediate compounds and volatile sub0011111mnldA. A ording t . this dntn, al nmin um oxide should be reduced
P.T.STROUP
- >O
-40
_,o
~
~
i
~
-60
-70
-80
- 90
-100
t!)
~w
-110
~ -120
1000
TEMPERATURE,
Fig.1.
2000
3000
DEGREES K.
'
4Al + 3C
...
P.T.STROUP
The formation of suboxides can occur by several proposed types
of reactions:
"'
~"'
0
<I
a:
"'u
0:
.,."'
~----.----------!
Al20C
+ LIO.
I
I
J. _____,
O'
I
I I
I
I
...,..~ Al404C
__L_
"'
4 l
a:
,/
I
,\
-'I
+ I
N
LIO. /
~I
1900
I
I
"'
"'
"'0
a:
"'
"'::>
ci>
I
I
2000
ALUMINUM
PRODUCING
REGION
2100
+ LIQ .
I-
1800
'
20
40
60
80
Fig,2.
Theoretical
Mols C/Mols Al 2o3
1/3
Product
Al 3o4
96:4
90: 10
AlO
85: 15
81:19
1 1/2
2
Al 4o4c
74:26
74:26
3
3
65:35
4 1/2
Al 20
Al 20C
Al
Al 4C3
P.T.STROUP
400
300
._,
<.>
200
a:
...
"
:!j
100
:':
......
Al20:s
Af20
e:
Al 2 0,
+ 3C
2AI
+ 3CO
+ 2C
2CO
"'
"
'
- io~o~o---.,.1.,.i
oo~o---,-'000---,--'ooo
TEMPERATURE,
Fig.3.
Free
Ener~y-Temperature
DEGREES K.
Al 2o3 + 3C
2Al + 3CO
...
lOO
z
~
w
..."'
0
200
..,
"'w
~
00
w
w
:::
TEMPERATURE,
Fig.4.
DEGREES K.
= AlCN
A ordlnl( to P bi n y; t h .formo.tion
:1 I
f th
volatile monocyanide
P.T.STROUP
increases with temperature above 17oo 0 c, and this explains the
apparent decrease in nitride formation. The presence of carbide
was reported in nitride made at elevated temperatures and explained
by the formation and disproportionation of monocyanide. Aluminum
monocyanide vapor can react with aluminum to form carbide and
nitride:
3AlCN
4Al
= Al 4C3
3AlN
2Al
AlF3
1200c
_ _ _ 3AlF
soo 0 c
100
""
1600
c
Cl
a:
C>
i= 1400
""
""""a:
""c
CHARGE
50% FERROALLOY
90% AICI + 10% AICl3 -
1200
U)
C>
1000
..;
a:
::>
I-
800
Cl
a:
""
""
IL
;I:
600 .
...
Rt:TURN LINE
I-
Fig,5,
2Al
3A1Cl
7oo 0 c
The ,reformed AlC1 3 is not condensed but is recirculated through
the reaction furnace.
~
ii:
;;;;;::-.;;;;;;;:::',....;;;;;::r-::::::J
0.40 rM:.c.A::..:X:.c.IMc:.UM"'-=-EF'-'F-'"'IC'-"IEo;.;Nc:.CV;__r---==:::::==:r---<;;;;::----==::::::r:-......
1sooc
1sooc
~
:!'
0.32
"3
"...
0
0.24
=>
0
a.
a:
~ 0.16
":!'=>
"=>_,
<l
...0
0.08
<f>
0
OL_----~~.::r::~::;;::;;;;::;;c::=::t::==,,,,,J,,======::::::::.L_..:::::i::::==::::::~::r==:::L-_j
10
100
50
TOTAL PRESSURE IN MILLIMETERS OF MERCURY
Fig.6.
500
760
P.T.STROUP
A1203 + 3C + AlC1 3 _, 3A1Cl + 3CO
l
2Al + AlC1 3
Oross 20 calculated that the above reaction would occur at 17oo 0 c
r t. ut..mospheric pressure, but warned that the reaction products must
In Hh c k-cooled or the aluminum quickly absorbed from the vapor to
1111 v nt r e versal to alumina and carbon. This is the same procedure
t.1 I 1 d f r carbothermic reduction of magnesia using hydrogen for
r hoc; lt
oling, which was not successful on a commercial scale. Free1111 rgy values for this reaction are shown in Figure 7 and confirm
llm 1H' ti calculations.
lOO
_j
;:
.."'
200
Alz03
3AICI
0:
3C
3CO
+ A ICl 3
"0
>-
<!>
0:
100
"'w
w
e:
- 100 ~--~----~---~
1000
lOO
2000
lOOO
TEMPERATURE, DEGREES K.
l'IK . 7.
l'r
111t.11'1HL
hrw I 11u UH
nHidorably as more re liable values have appeared for
1.111 t.111 rmooh1 mion.l properties of cryolite, aluminum fluoride,
r l.11111l1111m cai rhl<l< 1uHI nlum1num. n1tr1d . Additional confirmations are
11111 d1 d for, Liu 111 comDtiUndH tLn<l tLLt 11tion Rh uld now also. b directed
lnw111d I.he 1111111ov1il111L ti1imLHllllHl11, o:xy ' urb1dlH, i111ho ld fl rind othr
I 1 111 1 1 h1fi1w11 111111uo1111d 11 011 re 111111, 11 O!iKt1 I I, lo11 ,
:11,11
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17 .
P.T.STROUP
18.
19.
20.
'
.;
...
:i
(I
Abstract
HERBERT ff.KELLOGG
Sixty-nine of the ninety-two natural elements qualify as nonferrous metals, and this fact has some important consequences for
the subject under discussion. About half of these metals are
recovered and used on an industrial scale. These are: Li, Na, Be,
Mg, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Co, Ni, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, Zn,
Cd, Hg, Al, Sn, Pb, Sb, Bi, U. New additions to the list of
'industrial' non-ferrous metals have been frequent because of the
special requirements of the materials engineer in the space age.
Ferrous metallurgy involves the chemistry of iron and some ten
to fifteen associated elements. Other papers on this program have
illustrated the complexities of ferrous thermochemistry, and the
many gaps in knowledge which stand between us and fuller understanding
of the subject.
The principles of thermochemistry remain unaltered when we shift
our attention from ferrous to non-ferrous metallurgy. Any one nonferrous system is much like ferrous metallurgy in the degree of
complexity which must be unraveled by thermodynamic methods to
achieve understanding. But there are thirty or more industrially
important non-ferrous systems to be understood and only one ferrous
metallurgy. This fact alone explains much of the apparent backwardness of the non-ferrous industries in application of
thermochemistry to their problems. Activity-concentration relations,
for example, are relatively well known for molten pig iron and steel,
and this knowledge contributes greatly to our understanding of iron
and steel making. By comparison we have only rudimentary knowledge
of activity concentration relations in blister copper, black copper,
crude nickel, tin, aluminium, magnesium, lead bullion, etc.
Not only is the scope of non-ferrous thermochemistry many times
the .scope of ferrous thermochemistry, but the industries which must
support research in this area are small compared with the ferrous
industry. All of the non-ferroqs industries, lumped together, don't
equal the iron and st'eel industry in dollar volume of business. ~ The
largest of the non-ferrous industries (aluminium and copper) are
smaller than the ferrous industry by a factor of ten or more.
The enormity of the task and the limited resources of numerous
small industries represent the legitimate reasons for the slower
growth of' thermochemical knowledg e in non "' ferrous m tallurgy. One
....
:!!ill
HERBERT H.KELLOGG
extrapolated into the future, seem to answer these questions in the
affirmative . I take the optimistic view, however, that a resurgence
of research and development in the traditional non-ferrous industries
will soon reverse these trends and help to re-establish their
competitive position.
In summary, then, the needs of the non-ferrous industries are
for a more active and modernized approach to metallurgical research
and process development. For this purpose , a vast amount of presently
unknown thermochemical data will be required. Other papers on this
program have already indicated many of our needs for thermochemical
data, but I will summarize those most urgent for the non-ferrous
industries .
In hydrometallurgy, there exists a deplorable lack of data on
aqueous reactions at elevated temperature and pressure. The development engineer , concerned with pressure-leaching and
pressure-precipitation, lacks data on solubilities, phase relations
and equilibrium constants at temperatures in excess of 60c.
Aqueous equilibria involving ions often exhibit abnormally large
val ues of ,t",cp the change in heat capacity, with the result that
1 g K vs 1/T is a highly curved relation (often showing a maximum
r minimum). It follows that estimation of equilibrium constants
nt. 150-200c by calculation from known values of ,t",ff 0 298 and,i",s 0 298 1
on t.h ass umption that ,t",cp equals zero, can lead to entirely
1 1..-c n ous resul t s . The need for extensive new data in this area is
11 rl{t nL.
d-1:10.lt chemistry, which holds so much promise as the basis
l e r - winn ing of metals, for refining of spent atomic fuel, and
rnl' 111 t ornplishi ng many difficult separations of one metal from
n111ll.h1 r, tn n knowledge of solubilities, vapor pressures and activities
I 1ml't, I 11lnrly meager.
It will require many new data and conlih rnhlc d v lopment of solution t~eory before we can adequately
1111 cl let. b ho.vi r i n these.... fascinating : solution systems.
111 l' m-1
r111 1
In tlY romotnllur gy
1md J'o l l pwlnl( 1111 Ltl mrn-1L on Uri ly lllJ> ri e.l Ll))pr n.ch , I hav d vis d
ILll ( 11L,1 1111 t.111
11101:1 Cllll'I l'or c,,~Oll wht h l'( ti( mblo11 Ii" Lh J.1Lt.1nu 1 fl
:11 I
HERBERT H.KELLOGG
entropy method and a more detailed form of the Kopp-Neumann rule.
All the values needed to use the method are included in Tables I and
II. I can best summarize the value of the method by stating that the
Kopp-Neumann rule has an average error of 0.5 cal per 0 c per atom
in the compound when tested against a representative list of known
heat capacity values; my method reproduces the data with an average
error of .12 cal per 0 c per atom, when tested against normal valence
compounds, and .23 cal per 0 c per atom when tested against nonvalence intermetallics, carbides, silicides, borides, etc. The
increase in accuracy is noteable when estimating CP for a complex
compound such as M2(S0 4) 3, containing 17 atoms. The Kopp-Neumann
accuracy would be 8.5 cal/C/gram mole compared to 2.0 cal/C/gram
mole for the new method.
After compiling the tables, I tested the method by using it to
estimate CP for twelve compounds for which newly measured heat
capacities were reported in the current chemical literature. The
results are shown in Table Ill, and the accuracy of these estimates
(.1 cal/C/atom) is even a little better than I found for the data
on which the tables are based. This experience has given me some
confidence in the value of the method for estimating unknown data.
I am anxious for you to try the method and I would welcome your
suggestions for improvement. Following are a few typical examples
which illustrate the rules to be followed in using the data of TableH
I and II.
1) Estimate CP 298 for Al 2(S0 4) 3: In Table I find Al
valence compounds. In Table II find
so4=
3.5 for
'
5.6 in valenc
TABLE I
Atomic Contributions to CP 298
pt
6.3
Hf 6.3
Rb
6.3
Hg 6.3
Rh 6.2
s [5. o]
Ag 6.1
Al 3.5 (5.6)
As 5.1
Au 6.3
1. 5b
[6. 8]
In 5.6
Ir 6.3
K 6.2
La 6.5
Lanthanides 6.3
Sb 6.1
Li 4.9
Sr 6.1
Ca 5.6 (6.0)
Mg 4. 4 (5. 7)
Ta 6.3
Cd 6.0
Cl [6. O]
Mn 6.0
Mo 6.1
Te ?
Th 6.7
Co 6.0
N 4.5 (4.5)
Ti 5.7
Cr 6.0
Na 6.0
Nb 6.2
Ni 6.0
Tl 6.1
u 6.9
[4. o]
6.1
Ga 4.8
3.6
Ge 5.2
Pd 6.1
1. 3 (2. 6)
Ba
6.5
Be 1.8 (2.8)
Bi 6.5
Br [6. 6]
C
[2.0] (2.5) 8
Cs 6.4
Cu 6.0
F [5 . 3]
Fe
Pb 6.5
Sc 4.8
Se [6. 5]
Si 3.0(4.8)
Sn 6.1
v 6.0
6.5
5.6
Zn 5.4 (6.0)
Zr 6.1
= 4.0
HERBERT H.KELLOGG
TABLE . I I
Anion Contributions to Cp 298
Cation Charge
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
F.
5.5
5. 3
5.1
5.0
5.1
(5. 4)
c1
6.1
6.0
5.8
5.7
Br
6. 6
6.6
6.6
6.3
6.8
6.8
(7 . 0)
(6 . 8)
o=
s=
4.2
4.6
4.1
3.8
7.0
5.7
5.5
5.0
se=
Te=
N3
(7 . 5)
(6 . 5)
(8 . 8)
(6.)
(3. 8)
5.3
4.0
4.0
ow
(7. 7)
7. 1
SW
(12 . 6)
SeH.
( 11. 2)
co3=
14.5
13 . 8
N0 3so =
3
Cl03.
16.5
15.0
(16.7)
(16.3)
18.1
( 17)
Bro 3
(18. 9)
(18)
I03so 4=
Clo 4
crot
Cr204 =
(19)
BH -
4
CN-
(11)
3.6
4.1
(4 . 7)
(14.)
18. 2'
18.9
(5.7)
17. 9
(17.4)
19.2
22.2
...
25 . 7
'
15.5
(9)
(9)
(8)
..
cP
for MgO
= 29.3
= CP for Mg 3Sb 2
:10
HERBERT H.KEILOGG
TABLE III
Estimation of CP 298 for
Measured*
Compound
Soli~
Compounds
Estimated
6/atom
11. 53
11. 3
. 08
ZrC
9.13
8.6
. 27
BN
4.69
5.3
. 30
Ga 2Te 3
35.99
36.0
.oo
V Si
3
21. 84
22.8
. 24
Mo 3 Si
22.22
23.1
. 22
SrC1 2
17.98
18.1
.04
156.9
.08
ZrB 2
153.6
BeS0 4
20.65
20.0
.11
CaMg(C0 3 ) 2
37 . 65
37.6
.01
NbBl. 963
11. 42
11. 3
.04
UN
11. 31
10. 9
.20
...
'
..
Abstract
Owing to their speed and inaccessibility to direct observation
during blowing, oxygen steelmaking processes require computerized
control methods based on mathematical models in order to achieve
their potential capability and versatility. For these autogenous
processes a heat balance is essential even to the most elementary
control of tapping temperature through proper proportioning of the
charge. Heat contents of hot metal and liquid slags are not known
reliably and new de terminations are needed. The scope of other
thermochemical and activity data for slag-metal reactions needs to
be extended to cover a broader range of temperature and composition.
W.O.PHILBRUOK
In its essential physical chemistry, oxygen steelmaking is not
intrinsically different from the older methods of steel refining in
basic-lined furnaces. The primary objective of all of these
processes is the selective oxidation from liquid iron of carbon,
silicon and other solute elements down to the required low levels
while at the same time minimizing the loss of iron and other valuable
elements. Basic, rather than siliceous, furnace refractories are
now used almost universally, both for compatibility with the basic
slags that are necessary to remove phosphorus and sulfur and for
their superior ability to withstand high operating temperatures.
Some interesting applications of thermodynamics to steel refining
and deoxidation have already been presented at this symposium by
Dr.Fitterer and Dr.Langenberg and his coauthors.
The significant feature of oxygen steelmaking for the present
discussion is that it combines some of the characteristics of older
processes in a way that accentuates the desirability - indeed , the
necessity - fo r a much more comprehensive background of thermochemical
data than now exists. Furthermore, this comes at a time when our
ability to make use of this information is greatly enhanced by the
availability of high-speed computers and by ~mproved analytical
methods and sensing devices that are being developed.
One important attribute of oxygen steelmaking is its speed , which
compresses the time scale by about an order of magnitude in comparison with its natural competitor, the basic open-hearth process.
The open-hearth furnace of 15 years ago took 8 to 10 hours or more
to produce a heat of several hundred tons of steel, depending on
furnace size. The refining period lasted a couple of hours, and the
furnace was readily accessible for observation and periodic sampling
for chemical analysis and temperature to follow the progress of the
heat. Physical chemistry was ' a nice plaything for the metallurgists,
but a good melter usually did pretty well without it .
In contrast, the bJ sic oxyge~ furnace processes a heat of lOO ~ tO:
300 tons in 45 minutes to an hour, of which only 20 to 25 minutes is
the actual blowing time wherein all of the melting and refining are
accomplished. The equivalent of the refining period in the open
hearth has been compressed to less than 15 minutes and the oxygen .
converter is virtually inacessible without halting the blow t o
permit turning down the vessel. It mi ght seem logic~l to t hink t hat,
:rnn
...
:inn
W.O.PHILBROOK
called upon to do a man's job. The present situation is almost like
expecting a skilled mechanic to build an automobile engine with hand
tools. Even though the need for and ability to use physical chemistry
has suddenly jumped by an order of magnitude, the purchase or rental
of computers is not by itself going to produce the capital stock of
process data that still needs to be developed.
THERMODYNAMIC NEEDS
Most physical chemists prefer to work with nice, tractable
stoichiometric substances or binary solutions. The relatively small
number who have chosen to study the complex, multicomponent systems
that the metallurgist is forced to cope with, have properly concentrated on the problems that were most important at the time. It is
to their credit that the amount of information that has been developed
on steelrnaking systems is quite impressive as may be judged from
recent compilations. <23 > The emphasis thus far has been on
essentially isothermal studies of activity coefficients and equilibrium
constants of importance to terminal slag-metal reactions and
deoxidation. The available experimental data have been extended to
the utmost through the assumption of quasi-regular solution behavior
and other approximations. Not only do we need information on
additional systems, but we need also the enthalpy and heat capacity
data for extending calculations over the temperature span of
approximately 1600 to 2000K (2420 to 3140F) which is of active
interest in iron and steelmaking.
ENTHALPIES AND HEAT CAPACITIES
Because of the importance that heat balances have assumed in
oxygen steelmaking it is conv~nient to subdivide the discussion of
incomplete thermodynamic information. Enthalpy and heat capacity
data needed for heat balances and temperature coefficients will be
considered first, followed by ~~ee-energy and activity values for _
isothermal equilibritniJ calculations. The theoretical and experimental
interrelations among these quantities are recognized but are not of
primary concern in this treatment.
Metal Phases
The largest single contribution to the heat balance (298K
reference temperature) of the basic oxygen process is t h h at
content of the hot metal, wh ich a countA or ""ough y lml f t h
<l70
~71
W.O.PHILBROOK
400
~'Y-
375
./'.3V
/,
350
Y/
.' :/-I
_,/~
11V,~ /
'2P
.v
325
~ 300
'">
275
"
>-
~ 250
I
I
I
I
'-'
3 225
I
I
:i:
200
..
175
PIG IRON
o------o Experimental, Umino, (1926)
I/
150
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
TEMPERATURE, C.
Fig.1.
..
W.O.PHILBROOK
alloys. This seems like a reasonable approximation for solutes for
which the heat capacity in the liquid state can be used but is less
palatable for graphite. At their normal low concentration levels,
phosphorus and sulfur are best ignored in heat balance culculations.
The specific heat derived by the additive rule for the liquid pig
iron of Fig.1 was 0.200 compared with 0.215 reported by Umino. For
heat balance purposes, the writer prefers the calcuJation of the
heat content of the hot metal relative to elements at 298K from
high-temperature data by the methods outlined, instead of extrapolating Umino's experimental values of uncertain accuracy and
reference stdte. With the limitations of present thermodynamic data
there is a possible error of several per cent in this important entry
in the heat balance.
The heat content and heat capacity of the liquid metal at various
stages of processing to steel are obviously obtainable by the same
type of calculation, but the more closely the composition approaches
that of pure liquid iron, the less is the probable error.
Slag Phase
Slags are complex ionic melts of eight to a dozen or more componentR.
For heat balance purposes it is not necessary to understand their stru
ture or the reactions by which they are formed. It must be possible,
however, to compute the net enthalpy change for forming a melt of final
composition and temperature from components in a defined initial state.
Even disregarding considerations of accuracy, a formally correct
calculation of this kind is not now possible for steelmaking slags.
Heats of reaction and fusion are the first problem. It is customary
and convenient to define the components of slags as oxides, sulfur
compounds appropriate to the system, and fluorspar; phosphorus is
best handled as a phosphate to avoid complications of gaseous SP,ecies.
The heats of formation of these components from elements are well
known <3 13 > at 298K Q.nd in most' cases at steelmaking temperature's
as well . However, aside from molten wiistite and fluorspar, the major
components thus defined are solids at 1600C, and their heats of
fusion and reaction to form the melt are not known with any degree of
accuracy if at all. While it is interesting to know t hat nearly
ideal mixing occurs< 14 > between homologous molten silicates having.
cations of like valence and similar size, t his infor mation has limit d
usefulness when the
. heat s of formation a11d f usion of tho individ ual
:w
W.O.PHILBROOK
TABLE I
Heat and Entropy of Fusion and HeatCapacity
of Molten Substances of Possible Relevance
to Steelmaking Slags
6u
Tm(oK)
CP(t)
6sm/at.
Cp(.e,)/at.
ca 2Fe 2o5
36, 110
1750
74.20
2.29
8.25
CaFe 2o4
25,870
1510
54.90
2.45
7.84
Ca 2P2o7
24,100
1626
96.80
11
1.35
8.80
CaTiSi0 5
29,590
1670
66.80
2.22
8.35
CaF 2
7, 100
1691
23.90
1. 40
7. 97
Fe.9470
FeS
7,490
7,730
1650
16. 30
1. 95
2.33
8.36
1468
17.00
2.63
8.50
Fe 2Si0 4
22,030
1490
57.50
2.11
8.21
FeTi0 3
21, 670
1640
47. 60
2.64
9.52
MnS
6,240
1803
16.00
1. 73
8.00
V204
27, 210
1818
51. 00
2. 50
8.50
Ca3B206
Ca 2B2o5
35,490
1760
94.00
.. 11
1. 83
8.55
24,090
1585
68.20
1. 69
7.58
CaB 2o4
17,670
1435
1. 76
8.81
CaB 4o7
27,060
1260
91. 70
106 . 30
7
12
1. 79
8.86
NaFe0 2
11, 760
1620
37.30
1. 81
9.32
Na 2Si0 3
12,470
) 361
42.'80
1. 53
7. 14
Average
8 ..40
...
I
50 0
.-;
~ 40 0
/I
30
"'>
."'
1-
"'
1-
.I
20 0
'
I-
;:\
:i:
1/
p '
"'
.' i
10 0
_.,..Y
/
0./
0
200
400
600
800
TEMPERATURE , C.
Fig.2.
In Fig.2 are reproduced Umino's (lS) data for his sample 4, which
was carried to the highest temperature, and Naesers< 19 ) composite
resul~s for his samples 3 and 4, which had about the same 18% Si0
2
W.O.PHILBROOK
content as Umino's slags. The analyses reported for these slags,
weight per cent, were as follows :
p
Umino, No.4
Naeser, No.3
Naeser, No.4
18.3
3.1
41 . 9 5.4 13.7
..
where Mstand for any oxidizable element and 0 for oxygen dissolved.
in the liquid iron. Exceptions are carbon, with its gaseous oxides
that escape from the system, and sulfur, which enters the slag
predominantly in sulfide form.
From a purely thermodynamic viewpoint, the data needed comprise
activities or activity coefficients of elements in the liquid metal
and of oxides in the slag, together with equilibrium constants for
the correspond i ng reactions. Just as the components of molten slags
ur " ommonly d fin d. in terms of oxide species , so also are pure
Jd o UHULlly ~~ lo t1 d uH Htnndard stat s for o.ctivities of slag
:1'{ I
W.O.PHILBROOK
constituents. Ionic models have had only limited success for thermodynamic applications thus far. The standard free energies of oxides
from elements at steelmaking temperatures are in general well known.
This provides the basis for a thermodynamic treatment that is formally
correct and utilitarian but is independent of any particular model of
slag structure and gives little insight into reaction mechanisms.
The underlying principles and the considerable body of avai : able
equilibrium data have been capably summarized(2,3).
Multicomponent solutions with liquid iron as the solvent have
been studied rather extensively, and activities and interaction
parameters for solute elements have been measured for both dilute
and carbon-saturated alloys. The data up to 1963 have been compiled
by Elliott and colleagues< 2 3 > subject to a systematic
correction<2 2023 > dependent on molecular weight. As noted in connection with heats of solution, most of the tabulated activities
are based on experiments in a restricted temperature range and their
variation with temperature has been assumed to follow regular
solution, behavior. More recent work in several quarters is directed
toward obtaining molal enthalpies and entropies, so continuing
improvement of the activity data for liquid steel is anticipated.
The slag phase is inherently more complex and less well understood than the metal. For the oxidizing slags of steel refining
the experimental problem is complicated by the reactivity of liquid
iron oxide toward all available crucible materials. Hence, the
activity data are by no means as complete as the elegant treatment
that has been worked out< 24 > for slags of the CaO-MgO-Si0 2-Al 2o3
system under reducing conditions. Laboratory studies of slag-metal
equllibria are usually restricted to comparatively simple melts, and
various empirical correlations have been contrived in attempts to
extend the results to mor.e complex real slags. To be sure, the
equilibrium relations for s.ulfur and phosphorus elimination are more
involved than for the metallic impurities, but one needs only to
scan the 14 pages devot~d to sulfllr and phosphorus distribution in
Reference 3 to recognize that satisfactory, generalized thermodynamic
models for slags have not yet been achieved.
It might be argued that a need for more comprehensive thermodynamic
data is not the bottleneck in the construction of process models at
the present moment. Dynamic models require a knowl dgo of kinetics,
...
:1110
W.O.PHILBROOK
and oxygen balances throughout most of the heat. As these are perfected there will be increasing demand for thermodynamic activity
values over a wider range of slag and metal compositions and temperatures than are covered by present data. Research to broaden the
scope of fundamental information on steelmaking systems should be
fostered now in anticipation of the need.
The most serious and glaring deficiency for both current and
future needs is the absence of reliable heat content data for molten
pig iron and slags. A precise heat balance is the keystone of even
the most rudimentary mathematical model of oxygen steelmaking, Yet
it is not possible to make with confidence a heat balance for this
or any other steel refining or iron smelting process that involves
molten charge or products. Filling this gap in the thermochemical
data should be the first order of business, and it will probably be
accomplished most quickly by utilitarian calorimetric work on real
or synthetic slags and metals covering composition ranges of
industrial importance.
After supplying the immediate need for some numbers for practical
heat balances, a systematic calorimetric study of heats of mixing in
binary and multicomponent solutions in liquid iron and in molten
oxide systems would contribute immensely to the objectives of extending the accuracy and range of usefulness of activity data for
steelmaking. Such work would also be important basic research in
high-temperature physical chemistry.
'
:111 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
:m:i
W.O.PHILBROOK
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
:JIM
John E.Fogarty
Superintendent
South Division
Republic Steel Corporation
The subject of this panel session is the 'Needs for Future
Applications of Thermodynamics' . In illustration of such needs as
related to the vacuum degassing of liquid steel, some of the problem
areas associated with Republic Steel Corporation's induction stirred
ladle degassing facility in Canton, Ohio will be reviewed.
Consider that in order to achieve a reasonable profit, operating
management must produce a high quality product at the lowest practi cal cost. From a technical viewpoint, therefore, the best possible
systems analysis must be made.
Probably, the first thermodynamic aspect the degassing engineer
encounters is defined by the K
Pco
% c x fc x % o x f 0
equation.
:m
JOHN E.FOGARTY
E 3 50
)//
~
~
/V
3 25
30
.."'
27
...>
12~
....
z
~ 2 50
....
....
:z:
PIG IRON
2 25 t---t--~,-1 '
00
,)
1---17'--t
at 298K.
75/
5,l6'-oo--110'--o--12....
oo-1~30_0_1---+40_0_1~50-o-1s~o-o-11""'=
!l!f
TEMPERATURE, c.
Fig.1
Referring again to the equilibrium equations , it is found that
when they are used in an attempt to estimate the oxygen content of
a degassed heat that a tremendous difference exists between the
approximate oxygen c.o ntent of the steel and the theoretical
estimation. For example, a 1% C low alloy steel that is degassed
in the fully 'open' condition, at a pressure less than 100 microns
(Hg), normally ranges over 100 times higher in oxygen content than
the thermodynamic potential.
:mo
:1117
JOHN E.FOGARTY
include the immersion of the brick sample. This
difference provided a measure of the rate of
deterioration (stability) of the brick .
220
.200
l \
.180
.160
(
'\
._\
IYG
~s
2D
30
.032
.09
.030
.OS
~'
70
!
6
.<Yf
.06
(J
...,..
,,,,-
.
~
'!!
....
"!l
.05
.022. f<
.04
""" " ~
0
....
.,..0
. 021\
. 020
.03
.018
.()12
.016
. 01
...
:ll
8
u
::::
<ii
(~
X Gas ivol.Rate
Carbon IDss
Gl 51 Ucon "hop"
1<
.10
;)
.020
. 03~
. 026
.060
.o4o
. 11
.0'2@
'
.080
.036
80
Fig.2
This experiment was conducted on samples of several commercial
Al 2o3-Si0 2 bricks of varying composition. Gas evolution rates were
calc ulated from the pressure rise rates . The results showing
increased stability for bricks with higher Al 2o3 content, are
plotted in Figure 2.
The difference in the rates of evolution for the various brickl?
w uld be related to the effect of carbon in the bath on the products
o , for example, the Si0 2 = Sio(g) + FeO reaction, as follows:
2
:11111
Lly
:11111
JOHN E.FOGARTY
(1) The samples were centerless ground 1/4" rd
rod sections of AISI 52100 from the product
of a 25" x 27" x 12,000 pound ingot. A 500
pound length was sectioned and analyzed for
oxygen at 12" intervals to insure uniformity.
Included samples (3" long) were sent out for
the 'round-robin' analyses.
'
390
T.B.Winkler
Assistant to Director of Research,
Bethlehem Steel Co.
T.B.WINKLER
principles of thermodynamics, heat transfer, thermochemistry and
other di sciplines.
CHANGE OF SECTION SIZE
The last of the three aims, that of improving the efficiency of
section-size change, will be discussed only briefly, becaus~
solution of the problem is one of engineering design, hence not a
proper subject for extensive discussion at this conference.
Commercial requirements of size and gage for flat-rolled products
made on finishing mills of current design dictate that semifinished
slabs be made in a wide variety of sizes. This variety is readily
achieved with existing primary-mill facilities. If continuous
casting is to fit easily into an existing plant as a replacement
for a primary mill, then it must be capable of producing the same
variety of slab sizes. However, the current designs of continuous
casting machines do not provide for section-size changes to be made
easily or inexpensively .
At least three ways of compensating for this deficiency can be
advanced:
1. Finishing mills might be modified so that fewer slab sizes
would be needed for the same mix of final sheet or plate sizes.
2. The casting machine could handle a selected few sizes
representing a substantial portion of the tonnage and the primary
mi ll could continue to roll the balance.
3. The number of slab sizes could be reduced if re-examination
f the finishing mill operation' showed that not as many slab sizes
wr
actually needed.
...
:10:1
T.B.WINKLER
to withstand both the ferrostatic pressure of the liquid steel
within the bar and the tensile stress imposed by the stripping action
of the oscillating mold. If the casting speed is too fast and the
skin too thin and weak, the skin will rupture, a breakout will occur
and the casting operation will be forced to stop. In some instances,
a breakout results in damage to the machine.
If casting speed is to be increased, the rate of tieat transfer
from the solidifying bar to the water-cooled mold must be increased
to promote quicker formation of a strong skin. During casting, the
surface of the solidifying bar is in contact with the mold for a
distance of only a few inches below the molten metal surface. In
this area , the rates of heat transfer and of solidification are at a
maximum. Below this point, the solidifying bar shrinks away from
the mold and the air gap formed by the shrinkage lowers heat transfer , thus causing the rate of solidification to slow down. Ther efore
to accomplish higher casting speeds, mold design must be modified to
counteract the shrinkage of the solidifying bar so that the sur face
of the bar is in direct contact with the water-cooled mold wall for .
a greater distance , if not for the full length of the mold. In one
case, a mold of unique design tried on a German casting machine
permitted a casting rate nearly double the normal .
In the portion of the casting machine below the mold, casting
speed does not appear to be limited by the rate of heat transfer
from the surface of the bar. Optimum rates of heat transfer appear
to be possible in the spray chamber where heat is extracted by water
sprays. Below the spray chamber , where heat is dissipated mostly
by radiation to the surroundings, heat transfer rates are less than.
optimum but still adequate. In both sections the limiting heat .
transfer rate is nt that from the surface, but rather that from the
interior to the surface of the solidifying bar.
Further application of the principles of heat transfer, supported
by carefuH y designecf experiments and measurements both '0n casting
machines and in laboratory simulations, can lead to significant
improvements in casting speed, hence to broader commercial
application of continuous casting.
::194
fow ~ 1
lu
:Hlfi
T.B.WINKLER
only with irregular success. These erratic results can be attributed
to our lack of adequate control of deoxidation that is needed to
develop and maintain, during solidification, the precise rate of gas
evolution required to produce both a sound skin on the bar and deeply
seated blow holes. In m.v opinion adequate control of deoxidation
would be possible if we had in-plant methods for rapid, accurate
analysis of both carbon and oxygen concentration of the steel bath
at or near tap of the steelmaking furnace. Until such methods
become available, the steelmaker will be forced to depend on approxi
mate indications and control will continue to be erratic. Much work
is being done to develop rapid carbon and oxygen analysis. Here
again application of fundamental principles of thermochemistry may
produce fruitful results.
VACUUM DEOXIDATION
Another approach to the production of slabs for application to
low-carbon sheet is to substitute vacuum-deoxidized steel for
rimming steel. Several companies have dnnounced their intention
to explore this route and it is reported that one or two are already
doing some work. The work that has already been done on the vacuum
deoxidation of ingot steel should be applicable to continuous
casting. It now seems clear that none of the commercially available
methods for vacuum treatment is capable of lowering the oxygen
concentration in low-carbon steel to a sufficiently low level to
fully kill the steel. If no metallic deoxidizers are added after
vacuum deoxidation, the ingots solidify as semikilled steel. The
assumption is that a steel fully killed by vacuum deoxidation would
produce superior quality from the standpoint both of internal
cleanliness and of freedo~ from surface defects. Application of
fundamental principles may lead to more successful vacuum deoxidation
on the commercial ~cale and thus make steel of superior cleanliness
available for continuous casting.
'
INTERNAL SOUNDNESS
Continuously cast billets are well suited to the production of
merchant bar products such as reinforcing bar, flats, small angles
and small channels . . These .products make no serious demands on
either internal soundness or on surface quality. Cast billets are
also used for bar product of more demanding application such as
....
:urn
~espect,
T.B.WINKLER
solidifying skin of the bar. Proper design of tilndishes and nozzles
or other delivery devices should be helpful for controlling splash
of metal entering the mold. Adequate adjustment of casting speed
and of cooling rates in the spray chamber and oelow can result in
crackfree product. Any or all of these variables present
opportunities for the application of fundamental principles.
To sum up, the use of fundamental principles of thermodynamics
and related disciplines will be valuable for studies aimed at
increasing the continuous casting rate and at expanding the process
to include a broader range of steel grades, quality, and applications.
'
PANEL IV
DISCUSSION
Dr.Elliott Thank you Ted. The members of the panel have been very
well behaved. They've completed their task in a reasonable amount
of time, and now we will have a short period of discussion among
them. First, let's give the panel a chance. Who wants to raise the
first question? Dr.Stroup.
Dr.Stroup - I don't believe Dr . Kellogg ever told us why he had two
values for aluminium.
Professor Kellogg - There was quite a bit I forgot to t ell, really.
There is a group of 'compounds' for which ordinary rules of valence
don't apply. For example, it would be hard to decide what the
valence of boron is in zirconium boride, or the valence of silicon
in vanadium silicide. I found that I had to treat intermetallic
compounds, borides, carbides, silicides and some of the nitrides as
what I call non-valence compounds, and to assign different values
for the atomic contribution to heat capacity than for valence compounds. For aluminium I found a value of 3. 5 in valence compounds,
like Al 2o3 and 5. 6 for intermetallic compounds of aluminium, aluminium
boride, etc. In the same way, the value for boron is 1.3 in valence
compounds like B2o3, but 2.6 in borides. In all, my table I shows
special values for non-valence compounds of nine of the low atomicweight elements. For elements of high atomic weight I could find
no difference for the atomic contribution to heat capacity between
the non-valence type of compound and the valence type. Now what
all this means I will not attempt to explain, but these special
values are necessary for empirical correlation of the data.
Dr. Elliott Are there other questions ' on this point among the panel?
I have two quick ones. The first is, can we use these heat capacity
estimates for aqueous solutions and secondly, what is the prospect
of making a correction to these heat capacities somewhat in terms
of, say a Debye temperature so that your tables could be used at
higher temperatures, where as you point out yourself, we do need
add i t i onal information?
Profe~sor Kel l ogg - These tables are intended only for solid compoundH nt room t mperature, j ust as Lat i mer' s t ables for entropy
:100
DISCUSSION
estimation apply only for solids. There are other methods for
estimating entropy of ions and dissolved substances in aqueous
solution but they are considerably more complicated. It would
probably be possible to make such estimates of heat capacity in
aqueous solutions, but I have not tried to do so. YQur second
question, regarding the Debye temperature, contains a most
interesting idea. I have not yet progressed far with estimation
methods for heat capacity at elevated temperature, and I will
certainly investigate a Debye temperature correlation.
Dr.Elliott - Thank you.
Dr. May - Do you attribute the change with temperature of the heat
cape.city for ammonia solution to a change in hydration with
temperature or some other phenomenon?
Professor Kellogg - There are remarkably few data available on the
heat capacity of ions in solution, but what little data we do have
suggests that all charged species in solution have abnormally low
heat capacities compared with uncharged species. so, if you write
a reaction, such as I did, involving two un-ionized species, such
as ammonia and water, going to two ions like the ammonium ion and
hydroxyl ion, you will get a large negative heat ca~city for that
reaction. But if you write a reaction in which the same number of
charges appear on either side of the equation, the abnormally low
heat capacity of the ions tends to cancel each other and you no
longer get this very large change in heat capacity for the reaction.
For example, writing the ammonia-ammonium equilibrium in the form,
aqueous ammonia plus hydrogen ion goes to ammonium ion, the heat
capacity change for that reaction is quite small. I'm not sure this
answers your question, but pethaps you can restate it and I can try
again.
Dr. Elliott - Are there other c<?.vunents from the panel?
...
...
'100
PANEL IV
Dr. Stroup - Yes, it looks like a natural thought. The high t mlH 11
ture chemistry of all these monovalent compounds of aluminium is i n
the range at which you add aluminum to molten steel, and I would
be suspicious that the aluminum combines with the carbon and nitrogen,
and that they interact with each other. I guess steel people
recognize aluminum-nitride and oxide and I would suspect aluminum
carbide can also be present. We are just becoming aware that some
of these reactions could occur in steel.
Dr.Elliott - I have a question for Dr.May. I noticed that you did
not say anything about sulfides in your tabulation or in your discussion. Some of them such as cerium sulfide are quite stable at
high temperatures. You also alluded to the problem associated with
non-stoichiometry of many of these compounds. Do you think that our
efforts in handling these defect lattice structures that we are
encountering here are sufficient, or do we need more attention to be
paid to them?
Dr. May - I would certainly consider the sulfides as reasonable high
temperature materials. But, the point o! reference is to look at
the compounds which have higher melting points, i.e., higher than
tungsten. If we look at these, we are limited roughly to hafnium
carbide, tantalum carbide, the alloy which exists between hafnium
carbide and tantalum carbide, and the alloy which exists between
zirconium carbide and tantalum carbide. These illustrate extreme
high in temperature , therefore, I wish to emphasize these. Obviously
for lower temperature, you would have silicides , sulfides and
phosphides as additional pertinent materials to investigate.
Dr. Elliott - The second question dealt with non-stoichiometry and the
associated problems.
Dr. May - Well , that is difficult to answer because you're asking a
sort of indirect question. One would have to consider the crystal
structure that is present in tantalum carbide and the other refractory
carbides and nitrides. It is the face centered cubic structure
composed of interpenetrating lattices of the metal and the carbon.
When there is a deficiency of what we may call anions (although they
are probably not present as anions) such as carbon or nitrogen,
obv iQ._us ly ther e are vacant s ites in these positions . As I alluded
to befor e , tantalum carbide is very difficult to make as a
401
DISCUSSION
stoichiometric compound. It always seems to lack carbon. At one
time we thought that the usual 3 per cent atomic deficiency in
carbon was perhaps related to an ordering of the carbon vacancies;
thus, we attempted to detect it by x-ray diffraction. Of course,
the scattering power of the super-lattice thus generated would be
about 1 millionth of the strength of that of the main lattice, and
therefore, even though we meticulously used counting techniques
where we thought the lattice lines would be, we found no ordering.
Because of the melting point data (I must reaffirm) we believe
that the composition like Tac is that which would correspond to
compound. However, for some reason, such compounds apparently do
not vaporize congruently: when you heat these compounds to a high
temperature, they seem to lose carbon. It may be due to the
presence of oxygen by which the carbon is removed through an oxidation process yielding C0 2. Thus, it is difficult at present to
be sure if such compounds do actually vaporize incongruently,
Dr.Elliott - can I paraphrase your answer by saying that
non-stoichiometry is a problem?
Dr.May - It's a very great problem.
Dr.Elliott - I mean we have a great deal of work to do even with
one material because of the influence of structure of properties.
Even when we consider just the few that you have highlighted.
I have a question for the other end of the row down there , i.e. ,
all three of those steel people. Vacuum pouring followed by continuous casting is being considered as a way of avoiding many of the
problems associated with the conventional means of deoxidizing
steels by additions of deoxidizing elements. It is possible in the
cyclic use of ladles, etc., that on exposure to the air, the
refractories will absorb appre~ lable quantities of iron oxide. This
iron oxide may be a ~~jor source of oxygen in subsequent use of the
ladle. Has this problem been grappled with?
Dr.Winkler - We've attempted to 1 determine the influence of used
ladles compared with new ladles, and we have found that there is a
greater pickup of non-metallics from used ladles versus very well
dried and very well cleaned newly: relined ladles. Disturbingly
'102
....
PANEL IV
DISCUSSION
Dr.Elliott Thank you Dr.Winkler. There is a great deal of
technology in this with a number of over-tones with regard to
thermodynamics. Perhaps you could meet with the questionner at the
Electric Furnace Conference tomorrow. Mr.Fogarty, may we have your
questions?
Mr.Fogarty - The first one is from Dr .C.B.Alcock of the Imperial
College and he asks, 'Don't you think the low pressure degassing
would be less misleadir.lg than your term vacuum degassing?' This
really is not my term. Probably you are correc~ but this is a
general term within the industry, and I'm sure it would be rather
difficult to change it at this time.
The second question is from someone at Crucible Steel, 'Did you
notice to pick-up of zirconia through the reaction with the zirconia
crucible in your five pound melts of ASI - 1040, and if so, how
much?' If we picked any up it was less than 0.01% and we really
don't have much confidence in the results because they were so low.
We probably did, but I'm afraid I don't have a quantitative value
to give you. The next question is what vacuum is required to degas
steel? What is the measure used to determine the end of degassing?
Well, I would expect that the lower the pressure, the better.
Normally on a production basis, we say what is the measure used to
determine the end of the degassing, it's when the boil subsides,
i.e., it ultimately goes to a steady state boil, indicating a
probable reaction with the refractory.
The other question is, 'Does degassing give any problems with
the ladle refractories?' And I'd like to turn this around and say
that ladle refractories give us trouble with degassing.
The next question is, 'Would you comment on the relative merits
of the exploding stream degassin~ versus your technique?' Well, by
exploding stream, I a~sume that ' you mean stream degassing. I would
call it ladle-to-ladle stream degassing or ladle-to-mold stream
degassing because of a very limited .number of molds. If you are
dealing with very large ingots where ladle-to-mold degassing is
practical or if you are interested in the flaking problem, and wish
to eliminate hydrogen, then I would say that the stream degassing
system is particularly satisfactory. However, if you have to teem
PANEL IV
numerous ingots ladle-to-ladle stream degassing becomes a necessity.
Here, you have to heat two ladles with your steel necessitating a
much higher tapping temperature. Looking at the economic side of
it, ladle refractory cost is doubled and the furnace refractory
costs are significantly increased.
The next question. is what is your justification in attempting to
double chec.4 .v:alties of interaction coefficients determined in systems
containing' high purity raw materials in refractories by an industrial
process where it is likely that small quantities of extraneous but
influential elements are present? Actually, I don t attempt to
justify this, because I have not attempted to do it. I merely stated
that the effect of nickel, for example, is observed to be twice as
great as could be accounted for by its interaction coefficient. You
will note that I did not give any specific values about over-all
interaction effects nor coefficients because they very likely would
not be of any value to any other system or perhaps the same system
in another plant. They are, nevertheless, real problems and some
general measurements have allowed us to at least cope with our
problems. In addition, you might find it convenient to put all the
blame on the interaction coefficients but I did state in the paper
that there are questions regarding the effect of ladle refractories,
kinetics , etc., including small quantities of extraneous but
influential elements.
Dr.Elliott - Now, there is a question asked jointly of Professors
Philbrook and Kellogg, and I don't know if they're going to sing it
in duo or in tandem or what, but we'll leave it to them.
Professor Kellogg - The question is from Dr.Moles from National
Lead Company and is, 'How do we stand on estimating high temperature
, heat capacities for solids either on extrapolating from room
temperature or making use of very sparse high temperature data?' I
don't think we stand too well. Most of you are probably familiar
with Dr.Kubaschewski's book in which he discusses estimation of heat
capacities at elevated temperature. He gives one method there which
I think has proved fairly successful; and that is taking the
temperature of the first transition which occurs in the substances,
whether it be a melting point or a crystal transformation and
assum,tng that the contribution to the heat capacity at the temperature
is about the same for each of the atoms involved. I think
DISCUSSION
Dr.K.K.Kelley of the U.S. Bureau of Mines recommends a contribution
per atom of 7 calories per gm.atom, and Dr.Kubaschewski recommends
7.25 calories per gm.atom. I have attempted to improve the accuracy
of this method for estimation of heat capacity at the first transit ion temperature by developing tables of empirical values similar
to those I have developed for room temperature. Relatively few
data are available from which to calculate the empirical values,
however, and the uncertainty of the estimation method is rather
large - about O. 5 calorie per 0 c per atom ln the formula ..
Professor Philbrook - I'd make one quick addition. For substances
of the nature of blast furnace slags, for example, it seems that
the heat content in the range where it rises virtually linearly
with temperature, before the u17Nard inflection on incipient fusion,
is fairly close to that calculated from the sum of the contributions
of the oxides making up the slag. This may be good up to about
1000c or thereabouts.
Dr.Elliott - Dr.Stroup, do you have a question?
Dr.Stroup - The question which was submitted is, 'Can you say up to
what temperature aluminum carbide is stable?' It starts getting
pretty restless around 2200 centigrade, if it's held there for a
long time, the aluminum evaporates and leaves behind some beaut'iful
graphite crystals.
Dr.Elliott - Is there a reference on this?
Dr.Stroup - Yes, you will find some reference in my recent lecture
for the AIME on carbo-thermic smelting of aluminum. There's quite
a few references given there.
Dr.Elliott - . Professor C.B.Alcock has a question for Dr.May as
follows: 'There already exists a satisfactory amount of thermodynamic data for the r&fractory metal
' silicides. Have you any
particular reason for eliminating these compounds from consideration
for space application?'
Dr.May - This question was essentially answered before when I gave
the reason for not considering sulfides. The diborides, nitrides and
400
PANEL IV
carbides have the highest known melting points and are , th r J'o ,
the compounds I emphasize.
Dr.Elliott - We have a question for Dr.May from Dr.J.B.Bennett, of
the General Electric Company. 'Please comment on expected
advantages or disadvantages of using complex carbides being
synthesized I guess beforehand as dispersion hardening components.
How, do you expect their stability at elevated temperatures to
compare with thorium oxide in tungsten or in nickel?'
Dr.May - I can give you one example that occurred in our laboratory
a week or two ago. Somebody was trying to roll or draw columbium
carbide and put a sheet of tungsten around it before processing at
high temperatures. When he was finished he found that he had tungsten carbide on the outside and columbium in the middle of his
sample. Therefore, I think, at least this particular system is not
a good one. As for a nickel system, I would expect you would find
a little of the same sort of difficulty.
Dr.Kubaschewski (from the audience) - Please note, Dr.May, that the
systems indicated by the refractory compounds in your Table I are
also the most difficult to investigate quantitatively by experimental
thermochemical methods. In fact, in some cases, we do not know of
any reliable or sufficiently accurate methods for the measurements of
~H or.~ G0 .
Dr.Elliott - Dr.Kubaschewski, this points up one of the areas needing
attention in the next ten years.
Gentlemen, I wish to thank the panel for a very interesting
afte!'noon. If I may speak for the audience, I wish to say we all
have enjoyed the papers and discussion a great deal. There are many
other things we could discuss but time has run out and I would like
to turn the meeting back to Dr.Fitterer for adjournment .
. Dr.Fitterer - Thank you Dr.Elliott. In closing this conference, I
would like to say that just five months ago when we had this idea
of this Conference we had absolutely no idea that it would turn out
as well as it has. In fact, we were quite discouraged, however, as
I mentloned at the beginning of the meeting. We feel that a great
d al of th credit for the success of this Conference can be given to
1107
DISCUSSION
Dr.Kubaschewski. We would like to thank all of you who have come to
the Conference, and thank the participants particularly for their
e~cellent thought-provoking papers.
Now, in closing, I would like
to say one more thing. I would like to thank our committees particularly I would like to thank Miss Penny Brown, David Blewitt and
Carl Cassler and the projectionists and Mellon Institute for the use
of this excellent auditorium. Now, one more item, and this is that
within a year and a half you should see the following sign in your
mail, we may be having another conference. Thank you very much for
coming!
~s
...
'
~Cp
dT
PARTICIPANTS
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERENCE
NOVEMBER 29 DECEMBER 1, 196 4
1.
Dr.C.B.Alcock
University of London
London, England .
2.
Dr . J.A.Berger
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
12. Dr . O.Kubaschewski
National Physical Laboratory
Teddington, Middlesex,
England
3.
Dr.John Chipman
Massachusetts Institute of Tech. 13. Mr.A.F. Kolek
cambridge, Mass.
Crucible Steel Co.of America
Pittsburgh, Pa..
Dr.J.F.Elliott
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
14 . Prof . H.H.Kellogg
Cambridge, Mass.
Columbia. University
New York, New York
Dr.G.R.Fitterer
University of Pittsburgh
15. Dr.F. C. Langenberg
Crucible Steel Co . of
Pittsburgh, Pa . 15213
America.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
J.E.Fogarty
Republic Steel Co.
16. Dr.B.Meddings
Canton, Ohio
Sherritt-Gordon Mines
Alberta, Canada
Dr.P.W .Gilles
University of Kansas
Lawrence , Kansas
17. Dr . V.N.Mackiw
Sherritt-Gordon Mines
Dr .R.Hultgren
Alberta, Canada.
University of California
18. Dr.G.W.Mellors
B! rkeley, Calif.
Union Carbide Co.
br. T. R. Ingraham
Cleveland, Ohio
Canadian Mine.s Branch
19. Dr.C . E. May
otta.wa, Canada
NASA
Cleveland, Ohio
D~ . Everett J ohns on
N1lt.i no. l Bureau of standards
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. '
10.
PARTICIPANTS
20. Dr.C.W.McCoy
ALCOA
New Kensington, Pa.
26. Dr.S.Senderoff
Union Carbide Co.
Cleveland, Ohio
27. Dr.J.J.Ward
23. Dr . G.R.St.Pierre
Ohio State U.
Columbus, Ohio
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
24. Dr.F.D.Rossini
29. Dr.T.B.Winkler
Registrants
1.
Dr . Allen M.Alpern
Corning Glass Works
Corning, New York
6.
R.P. Abendroth
Owens Illinois Glass Co.
Toledo, Ohio
2.
Victor P. Ardito
Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp.
Brackenridge, Pa .
7.
Lufti Amra
General Electric Co.
Cleveland, Ohio
3.
F. H. Allison
Blaw Knox Company
Pittsburgh , Pa.
8.
J.Berkowitz
Arthur D.Little, Inc.
Cambridge, Mass.
4.
Paul M.Audette
ottawa , Ontario, Canada
9.
Alfred Buchler
Arthur D.Little, Inc.
Cambridge, Mass.
5.
J.F.Anderson
Western Gear Cor p.
Pittsburgh, Pa .
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERENCE
11. H.L.Bishop
Allegheny Ludlum Steel
Brackenridge, Pa.
28. D. L. Ball
General Motors Corp.
Warron, Michigan
12. J.G.Bassett
U.S. Steel Corp.
Monroeville, Pa.
29. V.C.Boucek
Rim-blox Co.
McMurray, Pa.
13. W.F.Brizes
Westinghouse Astronuclear
Large, Pa.
30. W.H.Burr
U.S.Steel Corp.
Duquesne, Pa.
14. E.L.Bedell
320 Brunswick Rd.
Louisville, Ky.
31. C.R.Bieling
N.J.Zinc Co.
Palmerton, Pa.
15. Dr.J.G.Bennett
General Electric Co.
Cleveland, Ohio
23. R.E.Boni
Armco Steel Corp.
Middletown, Ohio
33. C.C.Brown
General Electric Co.
Cincinnati, Ohio
34. D.H.Baker
Reno Met. Res. Center
Reno, Nevada
35. L.R.Bidwell
Aero Space Res. Lab.
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Ohio
36. D.E.Babcock
Republic Steel
Cleveland, Ohio
27. E.F.Bauer
Union Carbide
Niagara Falls, New York
37. D.W.Blewitt
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
lj 11
PARTICIPANTS
38. W.D.Bennett
Falconbridge Nickel Mines Ltd.
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
48. D.L.Creazzi
Crucible Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15330
39. J.Bindels
Bell Telephone Lab.
Allentown, Pa.
49. Dr.R.S.Cremisio
Universal Cyclops Steel Corp.
Bridgeville, Pa.
40. E.Aukrust
J & L Steel Corp.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
50. G.W.Cunningham
Battelle Memorial Inst.
Columbus, Ohio
41. F. W.Amery
Colarado Fuel & Iron Corp.
Pueblo, Colorado
51. L. Cooper
Heppenstall Co.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
42. Dr.D.Crimmins
U.S.Army Materials Res.
Agency,
Watertown, Mass .
52. Dr.J.Cuthill
National Bureau of Standards
Washington, D. C.
53. R.B.Corbett
Corbett Associates Inc.
Mars, Pa.
43. W.R.Chilcott
U.S.Steel Corp.
Monroeville, Pa.
54. L.P.Connor
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
44. D.Camp
Carnegie Tech
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
55. J.A.Clumpner
Olin Matheison Chemical Corp.
New Haven, Conn.
45. C.K.Chu
Westinghouse Electric
Youngwood, Pa.
46. J.M.Cigan
St.Joseph Lead Co.
Monaca, Pa.
47. L.Cogan
Linde Div-u.c.c.
Newark, New J er sey
56. D.C.Cusanelli
U.S. Metals Refining Co.
Carteret, New Jersey
57. Dr.G.N.Campbell
University of California
Los Alamos , New Mexico
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERENCE
58. E.J.Chapin
U.S.Naval Res. Lab.
Washington, D.C.
68. H.M.Davis
Army Res. Off ico
Durham, N.C.
59. H. P.Croft
Copper Range Co.
New York, New York
69. E.W.Dewing
Aluminum Labs., Ltd.
Arvida, Quebec, Canada
60. W,L.Davis
U.S.Steel Corp.
Monroeville, Pa.
70. J.R.Dietz
National Steel Corp.
Weirton, W. Va.
61. G.Derge
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
71. T.F.Dudash
Allegheny Ludlum
Brackenridge, Pa.
62. F.J.Dewez
U.S. Steel
Monroeville, Pa.
72. E.A.Dancy
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
63. J.B.Donihee
American University
College Park, Md.
73. L. S. Darken
U.S.Steel Corp.
Munroeville, Pa.
64. P.Duby
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pa.
74. J.Feinman
u.s.steel
Universal, Pa.
65. J. M.Dugan
Ohio Steel Foundry Co.
Lima, Ohio
75. R.J.Fekete
Ford Motor Co.
Dearborn, Michigan
66. J.H.Downing
Union Carbide
Niagara Falls, N.Y.
76. H.A.Fisch
General Electric Co.
Cleveland. Ohio
67. W.S.Dritt
Union Carbide
Oak Ridge, Tenn.
77. W.B.Frank
ALCOA Research
New Kensington, Pa.
PARTICIPANTS
78. J.W.Frederickson
Dow Chemical Co.
Midland, Michigan
88. B.Grupen
Bell Telephone Lab.
Allentown, Pa.
79. H.V.Fairbanks
89. W.H.Goodnow
J & L Res.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
90. J.G.Goodwin
80. T.P.Floridis
V.P. I.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
Blacksburg, Va.
81. P.A. Foster
91. S.Gilby
Ohiq State U.
Columbus, Ohio
92. G.H.Geiger
82. J.F.Foley,
University of Michigan
Madison 5, Wisconsin.
Babcock-Wilcox
Beaver Falls, Pa.
93. J. Godshall
Westinghouse Electric
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Tohoku University
Sendai, Japan
94. K.Grjotheim
Technical University of
Norway
State College, Pa.
84. J.C.Fulton
95. W. Hogue
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
86. E.A.Gulbransen
...
96. D.Halliday
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
87. J.Gordon
Blaw Knox Co.
Pi tts burgh, Pa .
!NCO
uf1' rn , N w York
I I I
"
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERENCE
98.
Dr.J.P.Hansen
University, Alabama
108. E.J.Hohman
J & L Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
D.C.Hilty
Union Carbide
Niagara Falls, New York
109. P.Jackson
Ford Motor
Dearborn, Michigan
MTE
99.
100. R.L.Holmer
Union Carbide
Newark, N.J.
110. H.A.Johansen
Westinghouse Res.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
101. J . B.Huvos
Bureau of Mines
Greenbet, Md.
111. E.W.Johnson
Westinghouse Electric
Pittsburgh, Pa.
102. D.J.Hansen
Union Carbide
Niagara Falls, N.Y.
112. L.K.Johnson
103. C.C.Herrick
University of California
Los Alamos, N.M.
113. F.G.Jones
104 . H.P.Hopkins
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
114. C.A.Julien
105. E.Hodges
115. J.M.Henderson
American Smelting&Refining
South Plainfield, N.J.
Crucible Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Crucible Stee 1
Pittsburgh, Pa.
116. P.Grieveson
107. T.S.Howard
Chase Brass and Copper Co.
E1:1olid . Ohio
117. J.Jasper
U.S. Steel
Monroeville, Pa.
Ohio State U.
Columbus, Ohio
11
PARTICIPANTS
118. S. G. Johnson
Standard Steel Co.
Lewistown, Pa.
128. T.M.Krebs
Babcock & Wilcox
Beaver Falls, Pa.
119. E.F.Jordan
General Motors
Bristol, Conn.
129. R.Caplan
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
120. T.S.Jones
Allegheny Ludlum Steel
Brackenridge, Pa.
130. W.L.Kerlie
U.S.Steel
Monroeville, Pa.
121. R. Jackson
J & L Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
131. 0. J. Kleppa
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
122. R.E.Johnson
Penn state U.
University Park, Pa.
132. G.H.Kessler
National Steel Corp.
Weirton, W. Va.
123. S.M.Kaufman
Ford Motor Co.
Dearborn, Mich.
133. T.F.Kaveney
Union Carbide
Niagara Falls, N.Y.
124. P.J.Koros
J & L Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
134. D.J.Knight
Atlas Steel Co.
Welland, Ontario, Canada
125. J.Krawczykiewicz
Westinghouse Electric
Youngwood, Pa.
135. A.ff.King
Arthur D.Little, Inc.
Cambridge, Mass.
126. W.Kernner
Wheeling Steel
Steubenville, Ohie
136. Dr.J.G.Kreible
General Electric Co.
Cleve land, Ohio
127. S. Klinvex
Bureau of Mines
Pittsburgh, Pa.
'
137. R.J.King
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERENCE
148. Dr.A.H.Larson
Colorado School of M n OH
Golden, Colo.
138. C. W.Kovach
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
139.
149. H. Lipsey
~.Kubit
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
140. Dr.W.A.Klemm
Kaiser Aluminum & Chem.
Corp.
Permanente, California
150. Dr.A.Liberman
Zenith Radio Corp.
Chicago, Illinois
151. S.S.Lin
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas
141. W.Klawitter
Carpenter Steel Co.
Reading, Pa.
152. R.Littlewood
Steel Co. of Canada
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
142. Dr.C.H.Li
Grumman Aircraft
Bethpage, New York
153. W.Mahan
Bureau of Mines
Pittsburgh, Pa.
143. J.W.Linhart
154. J . .Morris
Bureau of Mines
Pittsburgh, Pa.
144. G.Long
155. W.H.McCluskey
Whee ling Stee 1
Mingo Junction, Ohio
145. T.S.Lundy
Union Carbide Nuclear Co.
Oak Ridge, Tenn.
156. R.C.Masse
Allegheny Ludlum
Brackenridge, Pa.
146. H. F.Leonard
Coppers Inc .
. Pittsburgh, Pa.
157. F.E.McBride
General Electric Co.
Cleveland, Ohio
147. D.C.Ludwigson
University of Pittsburgh
~ittsburgh, Pa. 15213
'11 '1
PARTICIPANTS
158. F.X.McCawley
Bureau of Mines
College Park, Md.
168. O. W.Moles
National Lead Co.
South Amboy, N.J.
159. R.T.MacMillan
Bureau of Mines
College Park, Md.
169. O.T.Marzke
U.S. Stee 1 Corp.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
160. J.J.Millen
General Electric Co.
Cleveland, Ohio
170. 0.0.Miller
Met. Engr.
New York, N. Y.
161. W. F. Morse
Columbia Gas System
Columbus, Ohio
171. L.R.Matricardi
Union Carbide Corp.
Niagara Falls, N. Y.
162. G.T.Motock
Met. Engr.
Hamden, Conn.
172. S.Mellgren
U.S.Metals Refining Co.
Carteret, N.J.
163. A.Muan
Penn State University
University Park, Pa.
173. Dr.L.A.McClaine
Arthur D.Little, Inc.
Cambridge, Mass.
164. A.E.Morris
Penn State University
University Park, Pa.
174. R.B.McLellan
Rice University
Houston, Texas
165. L.J.McGeaay
Lafayette College
Easton, Pa.
175. C.K.Mader
Swindell-Dressler Co.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
166. R.E.Musgrove
Climax Molybdenum Co.
New York, N.Y.
....
176. J.N.Marshall
Babcock & Wilcox
Beaver Falls, Pa.
'
167. R. S. Mateer
177. F.J.Millero
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Ky.
'11 IJ
178. J.Megusar
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
1111111
La n l lt 11 1,1 11 1 111
Chi cago , 1 1 l.
179. F.Muller
Inland Steel Co.
Hammond, Ind.
189. 0.0.0matete
180. H.D.Myers
Princeton University
Princeton, N. J.
192. E.F.Pearson
Colorado Fuel & Iron
Pueblo, Colo .
183 . W.McKewan
193. D.Puotinen
R.C.A.
Harrison, N. J.
194 . R.E.Paine
185. Dr.Morse
195 . M. F. Parkman
Aerojet General
San Ramon, Calif.
Consultant
Whittier, Calif .
A.F.M.L.
Yellow Springs , Ohio
186. A.E. Nehrenberg
Simonds Saw & Steel Co.
Lockport , N. Y.
187. F. G.Norris
Wheeling Steel Co .
Steubenville, Ohio
Crucible Stee 1
Pittsburgh, Pa .
119
PARTICIPANTS
208. N.Parlee
Stanford University
Stanford, Calif.
198. W.F.Portez
J & L
Pittsburgh, Pa.
199. J.Preston
Allegheny Ludlum
Brackenridge, Pa.
209. J.L.Peterson
La Salle Steel Co.
Chicago, Ill.
200. A.Prokopovitsh
U.S. Dept. of Interior
Washington, D.C.
211 . D.I.Reichmayr
Consultant
Pittsburgh, Pa.
202. Dr.A.Pehler
Westinghouse Electric
Pittsburgh, Pa.
212. D.L.Raymer
Latrobe Steel Co
Latrobe, Pa.
203. R.D.Pehlke
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Mich.
213. F.E.Rizzo
Aerospace Res. Lab.
Wright Patterson Air Fore
Base, Ohio
204 . G.W.Perbix
Republic Steel Corp.
Cleveland, Ohio
214. J.N.Reding
Dow Metal Products
Midland, Mich.
215. E.A.Reid
Columbia Gas Co .
Columbus, Ohio.
206. D. S.Parsons
Sylvania Electric
Towanda, Pa.
216. W.P.Roe
American Smelting & R f
South Plainf i e ld, N.J.
207. C.Prasky
U. S. Bureau of Mi nes
Minn apol s. Minn.
I ' 0 -
11 111
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERENCE
218. E.Rosen
Penn State U.
University Park, Pa.
228. E.Salkovitz
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213.
219. R.Reese
Ohio State U.
Columbus, Ohio.
229. H.S.Spacil
G.E.
Schenectady, N. Y.
220. T.W.Ratcliffe
Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Beaver Falls, Pa.
230. Dr.L.L.Seigle
State Univ. of New York,
Stony Brook, L.I., N.Y.
221. R.Ricksecker
Chase Brass & Copper
Cleveland, Ohio
231 . W.F.Schilling
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
222. S.T.Ross
Brooks and Perkins Inc .
Detroit, Mich.
232. Dr.A.W.Schlechten
Colorado School of Mines
Golden, Color.
223. H. J.Ritz
Climax Molybdenum Co.
Langeloth, Pa.
233. E. J.Smith
National Steel Corp.
Weirton, w. Va .
224. P.Larosa
u.s.steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
225. D.Ryan
National Forge
warren, Pa.
240. M.A.Scheil
A. 0. Smith Corp.
Milwaukee, Wisc .
226. G.Szilva
Climax Molybdenum
coldwater , Mich.
241. G.C.Sinke
Dow Chemical Co.
Midland, Mich .
227. C.E.Shoemaker
Bet hlehem St ee l Co.
B thl hem, Pa .
242. C. W.Spicer
U.S. Stee 1 Corp.
Duquesne, Pa .
ii' I
PARTICIPANTS
243. R.J.Slusar
Olin Matheison
New Haven, Conn.
253. G.Smith
J & L Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
244. L.F.Sander
Penn State U.
University Park, Pa.
254. W.Spear
International Nickel Co.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
245. A.Simkovich
Latrobe Steel Co.
Latrobe, Pa .
255. F. Tartaron
Bureau of Mines
Pittsburgh, Pa.
246. R.H.Spitzer
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
256. E.S.Tankins
Naval Air Center
Philadelphia, Pa.
247. W.F.Stowasser
Air Products & Chemical
Inc.
Allentown, Pa.
257. M.S.Tubino
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
258. R. Tougas
Ecole Polytechnique
Montreal, Canada
248. P.E.Snyder
Westinghouse Res. Lab.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
259. E.T.Turkdogen
U.S.Steel Corp.
Monroeville, Pa.
249. R.B.Shaw
Allegheny Ludlum Steel
Brackenridge, Pa.
250. Dr.H.W.Schnaible
U.S. Steel Res.
Monroeville, Pa.
251. P.Schneider
Dravo Corp.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
252. A.J.Skalican
U.S.N.
Annapolis, Md.
260. S.Tager
Case Inst. Of Tech.
Cleveland, Ohio
'
261. G. H. Turner
Consolidated Mining &
Smelting Co.
Trail, Canada
262. M. C.Udy
Udy Processes Inc.
Niagara Falls, N' Y.
THERMODYNAMICS CONFERrnNcm
263. K.J.Vogel
3648 Forest Ave.
Munhall, Pa. 15121
264 .
o. Valla
Penn state U.
College Park, Pa.
273. L. A. Will y
ALCOA Rea . LR h.
New Kensingt n, I .
274. R. W. Wilson
Pittsburgh Met . Div. Alt
Cleveland, Ohio
265. Dr.G.Waddington
National Academy of Science
Washington, D.C.
275. W. Wilson
A.Fink! & Sons
Chicago, Ill.
266. P.N.Walsh
Union Carbide
Tarrytown, N. Y.
276. W.G.Wilson
Molybdenum Corp.
Pittsburgh, Pa .
267. J.S.Warner
Columbia University
Tappan, N. Y.
277. D.W.G.White
Depart. of Mines & Tech.
Surveys
ottawa, Ontario, Canada
268. I. H. Warren
University of B.C.
Vancouver, B. C.
269. J.R . Weeks
Brookhaven National Lab.
Upton, L.I., N.Y.
270. P. L.Weston
U.S.B.M.
.Minneapolis, Minn.
271. T. C. Wilder
Kennecott Copper Co.
Lexington, Mass.
272. D. II. W lkins on
N. r. 7. lnci Co.
I I111! l'l,011, Pt
278. F.H.Woehlbier
Battelle Mem. Inst.
Columbus, Ohio
279. Dr.E.F.Wondris
,National Steel Corp.
Weirton, W. Va.
280. G.W.Worth
Republic Steel
Cleveland, Ohio
281. P. Woolf
Bureau of Mines
Pittsburgh, Pa.
282. J.E.Werner
Bethlehem Steel
Bethlehem, Pa.
....
11
PARTICIPANTS
283. F.M.Wiberg
Swindell-Dressler Co.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
293. J.M.Gaines
Union Carbide Co.
New York, N. Y.
284. Dr.C.H.Wilkins
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, Ala.
294.
285. H. A.Wriedt
U.S. Steel
Monroeville, Pa.
295. K.Schwerotfeger
U.S. Steel
Pittsburgh, Pa.
286. Dr.C.A.Wulff
Carnegie Inst. of Tech.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
296 . L.M.Diran
International Nickel Co.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
287. N.Yoshida
W.S .Atkins & Assoc.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
297. R.L.Mickelson
Interlake Iron Corp.
Wellcmick, Ohio
288. C.V.Zabielski
1685 Parkline Dr.
Pittsburgh 27, Pa .
298. C.R.Lillie
Arnsted Industries
Bensenville, Illinois
289. Dr.C.A.Zapffe
earl A.Zapffe Firm
Baltimore, Md.
299 . F.Ernick
Westinghouse Electric
Greensburg, Pa.
290. G.R.Zellars
Aerospace Science
Cleveland, Ohio
300. W.M.Hyams
Crucible Steel
Midla~d, Pa.
291. R.B.Emerick
Allegheny Ludlum
Brackenridge, Pa.
o. M.Katz
Westinghouse Electric
Pittsburgh, Pa.
'
292. B.Hoffacker
St. Joseph Lead Co.
Monaca, Pa.
302. W.A.Roberson
Rutherford Co.
Cleveland, Ohio
421