Counter Affidavit CA-murder
Counter Affidavit CA-murder
Counter Affidavit CA-murder
COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT
11. Cedric told me that when he told Nena to stop seeing him, she
refused. Instead, she threatened him that she would rather have them all dead
and said,"Subukan mo lang iwan ako, makikita mo."
12. At around 2pm last November 28, 2014, I received a text message
from Cedric Diaz. the content of the message was, "Pare, ayaw pumayag ni
Nena na maghiwalay kami, parang may gagawin siya pag tinigil ko relasyon
namin. Screenshots of the aforementioned text messages are likewise
attached herewith.
13. Piolo Pascual and Bradd Pitt must have been planning this plot
with Nena. Piolo and Bradd are close friends of Nena, they often visit her
store and were buying items from her store on credit.
14. Furthermore, if they truly intended to save Cedrick who was then
in a dying condition, they should have brought him to the nearest hospital at
either New Era General Hospital or Malvar Hospital and not at FEU-Dr.
Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation which would take approximately about
30 minutes to drive from the place of incidence.
15. Moreover, the submitted Post Mortem Examination is patently
deficient for it failed to completely explain and describe the cause of the
death of the victim. Mere indication therein that the cause of death was due
to stab wounds does not suffice.
16. Assuming that I am guilty of the offense accused of in the
complaint, I should only be guilty of homicide. The elements of murder are:
1) That a person is killed; 2) That the accused killed him; 3) That the killing
was attended by any of the qualifying circumstances mentioned in Article
248; and 4) The killing is not parricide or infanticide.
Treachery was the qualifying circumstance which elevated the case to
murder as alleged in the complaint. However, in the case of People vs
Tumaob, 83 Phil 742, the Supreme Court held that, "But to constitute
treachery, the means, methods or forms of attack must be consciously
adopted by the offender."
There is no treachery in the case at hand, a few minutes of interval
does not prove treachery. It was clearly indicated in the complaint that at
around 8:00pm, we started drinking which lasted for more or less than one
hour and that the incident happened at around 9:30pm.
From the time we were drinking up to the time of the killing, as
alleged by Nena, no enough time could have allowed me to plot the killing.
The spontaneity of the events disproves the presence of treachery. Hence, no
(name) (sgd.)
Asst. City Prosecutor