Case Fast Gro Fertilizers

1
CASE STUDY : RED BRAND CANNERS
FACULTY : S SESHASAYEE
On Monday, September 13, 1965, Mitchell Gordon, vice-president of operations,

asked the controller, the sales manager and the production manager to meet with him
to discuss the amount of tomato products to pack that season. The tomato crop, which
had been purchased at planting, was beginning to arrive at the cannery and packing
operations would have to be started by the following Monday. Red Brand Canners was
a medium-sized company that canned and distributed a variety of fruit and vegetable
products under private brands in the western states.
William Cooper, the controller and Charles Myers, the sales manager were the
first to arrive in Gordon's office. Dan Tucker, the production manager, came in am few
minutes later and said that he had picked up Produce Inspection's latest estimate of the
quality of the incoming tomatoes. According to their report, about 20 percent of the
crop was grade "A" quality and the remaining portion of the 3,000,000-pound crop was
grade "B."
Gordon asked Myers about the demand for tomato products for the coming year.
Myers replied that for all practical purposes
they could sell all the whole canned
tomatoes they could produce. The expected demand for tomato juice and tomato paste,
on the other hand, was limited. The sales manager then passed around the latest
demand forecast, which is shown in Exhibit 1. He reminded the group that the selling
prices had been set in light of the long-term marketing strategies of the company and
potential sales had been forecast at those prices.
Source: The above case can be found in many text books or case collections on Management Science,
originally published by Stanford Business School 1965
EXHIBIT 1
DEMAND FORECASTS
Product Name
SELLING
PRICE(CASES)
PER CASE ($)
DEMAND
FORECAST
24-2 1/2 Whole Tomatoes
4.00
800,000
24-2 1/2 Choice Peach Halves
5.40
10,000
24-2 1/2 Peach Nectar
4.60
5,000
24-2 1/2 Tomato Juice
4.50
50,000
24-2 1/2 Cooking Apples
4.90
15,000
24-2 1/2 Tomato Paste
3.80
80,000
Bill Cooper, after looking at Myer's estimates of demand, said that it looked as
if the company "should use the entire crop for the whole tomatoes and should do quite
well (on the tomato crop) this year." With the new accounting system that had been set
up, he had been able to compute the contribution for each product and according to his
analysis the incremental profit on the whole tomato was greater than any other tomato
product. In May, after Red Brand had signed contracts agreeing to purchase the growers'
production at an average delivered price of 6 cents per pound. Cooper had computed
the tomato products' contributions as shown in Exhibit 2.
EXHIBIT 2
PRODUCT ITEM PROFITABILITY
Costs
24-2
Canned
Whole
Tomatoes
24-2
Choice
Peach
Half
24-2
Peach
Nector
24-2 24-2
Tomato Cooking
Juice
Apples
24-2
Tomato
Paste
Selling Price (Per Case)
$4.00
$5.40
$4.60
$4.50
4.90
$3.80
Direct Labour
1.18
1.40
1.27
1.32
0.70
0.54
Variable Overhead
0.24
0.32
0.23
0.36
0.22
0.26
Variable Selling
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.85
0.28
0.38
Packaging Material
0.70
0.56
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.77
Fruit # (cost per case)
1.08
1.80
1.70
1.20
0.90
1.50
Total Variable Costs
3.60
4.38
4.20
4.38
2.80
3.45
Net Profit (per case)
0.40
1.02
0.040
0.12
2.10
0.35
Variable Costs
Product usage is as given below.
PRODUCT
POUNDS
PER CASE
Whole Tomatoes
18
Peach Halves
18
Peach Nectar
17
Tomato Juice
20
Cooking Apples
27
Tomato Paste
25
Dan Tucker brought to Cooper's attention that, although there was ample
production capacity, it was impossible to produce all whole tomatoes, because too small a
portion of the tomato crop was "A" quality. Red Brand used a numerical scale to record
the quality of both raw produce and prepared products. This scale ran from zero to
ten, the higher number representing better quality. Rating tomatoes according to this
scale, "A" tomatoes averaged nine points per pound and "B" tomatoes five points per
pound. Tucker
noted that the minimum average input quality
for
canned whole
tomatoes was 8 points per pound and for juice it was 6. Paste could be made entirely
from "B" grade tomatoes. Thus the whole tomato production was limited to 800,000
pounds.
Gordon stated that this was not a real limitation. He had recently been
solicited to purchase any amount up to 80,000 pounds of grade "A" tomatoes at 8.5
cents per pound and that time he turned down the offer. He felt, however, that the
tomatoes were still available.
Myers, who had been doing some calculations, said that although he agreed that
the company "should do quite well this year," it would not be canning whole tomatoes. It
seemed to him that the tomato cost should be allocated on the basis of quality and
quantity rather than by quantity only, as Cooper had done. Therefore he had
recomputed the marginal profit on this basis (see Exhibit 3) and from his results, Red
Brand should use 2 million pounds of the "B" tomatoes for paste and the remaining
400,000 pounds "B" tomatoes and all the "A" tomatoes for juice. If the demand
expectations were realized, a contribution of $48,000 would be made of this year's
tomato crop.
EXHIBIT 3
MARGINAL ANALYSIS OF TOMATO PRODUCTS

Z = cost per pound of "A" tomatoes in cents
Y = cost per pound of "B" tomatoes in cents
(1)
(600,000 lb x Z)+(2,400,000 lb x Y = 3,000,000 lb x 6)
(2)
Z/9 = Y/5
Z = 9.32 cents per pound

Y = 5.18 cents per pound
PRODUCT
CANNED
WHOLE
TOMATOES
TOMATO
JUICE
TOMATO
PASTE
Selling Price
$4.00
$4.50
$3.80
Variable
Cost(excluding
Tomato Cost)
$2.52
$3.18
$1.95
$1.48
$1.32
$1.85
Tomato Cost
$1.49
$1.24
$1.30
Marginal Profit
($0.01)
$0.08
$0.55
Discussion Questions :
1. Why does Tucker state the whole tomato production is limited to 800,000 pounds
(ie where does the number 800,000 come from)?
2. What is wrong with Cooper's suggestion to use the entire crop for whole tomatoes?
3. How does Myers compute his tomato costs in Exhibit 3? How does he reach the
conclusion that the company should use 2,000,000 pounds "B" tomatoes for paste
and the remaining 400,000 pounds of "B" and all "A" in juice? What is wrong with
Myers's reasoning?
4. Without including the possibility of the additional purchases suggested by Gordon,
formulate as an LP the problem of determining canning policy for this season's

crop. Define your decision variables in terms of pounds of tomatoes. What is the
net returns for the company as per this policy?
5. Do you think you need to remodel the above scenario to see if it is worthwhile to go
for additional purchases suggested by Gordon?
6. How should your model be modified to see what is the best canning policy if you
need to include the possibility of the additional purchases suggested by Gordon?

Case Fast Gro Fertilizers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case Fast Gro Fertilizers

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case Fast Gro Fertilizers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

CASE STUDY : RED BRAND CANNERS

On Monday, September 13, 1965, Mitchell Gordon, vice-president of operations,

they could sell all the whole canned

24-2 1/2 Whole Tomatoes

24-2 1/2 Choice Peach Halves

24-2 1/2 Peach Nectar

24-2 1/2 Tomato Juice

24-2 1/2 Cooking Apples

24-2 1/2 Tomato Paste

Selling Price (Per Case)

Fruit # (cost per case)

Total Variable Costs

Net Profit (per case)

Product usage is as given below.

noted that the minimum average input quality

MARGINAL ANALYSIS OF TOMATO PRODUCTS

(600,000 lb x Z)+(2,400,000 lb x Y = 3,000,000 lb x 6)

Z = 9.32 cents per pound

4. Without including the possibility of the additional purchases suggested by Gordon,

formulate as an LP the problem of determining canning policy for this season's

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.