Peterfoss79

Schematics for free energy inverter

Kickstarter Free energy inverter

PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com

This e-book is freely distributable with quotation of the author

The world is often unkind to new talent, new creations

The purpose of this chapter is to outline the constructive guidelines of an Edwin Gray derivative

free energy inverter capable of testing the theory described so far.

The machine also incorporates some safety features not incorporated by Gray but derivated

from Tesla experience with electric power transmission, and the need of shielding the spark gap

to avoid interferences with nearby electric equipment.

Two version of the inverter are outlined in revision 01C and 01D present at the end of this

document, but before we start discussing these machines we need to familiarize with a couple

of unusual particles and electromagnetic radiations, I recommend the reader to lookup my

previous

work

on

Scribd

or

dangerous thoughts rev 01.

Bittorrent

for

more

details:

Edwin

Gray,

antigravity

and

other

Superelectrons and EMP radiation

(probably few tens of times) than a normal electron. They are generated upon impact of high

kinetic energy electrons against the anode on a spark gap and once generated they eventually

decay back to a normal electron state.

Gray mostly investigated the production and harnessing of superelectrons in his machines.

The EMP radiation is a particular type of electromagnetic radiation capable of broadcasting an

electron superstate to a receiving antenna or otherwise to an ionized gas capable of capturing

the specific EMP frequency,

Nikola Tesla worked with machines very similar to Gray ones if it wasnt for the fact that he did

not have diodes available back in the days, nevertheless he harnessed the same particles Gray

did, but also demonstrate the possibility of broadcasting superelectrons through electromagnetic

radiation.

It is important to note that the impact energy of electrons is the important parameter of operation

of both Gray and Tesla machines, meaning that it is possible to operate very compact spark

gaps but at very high voltages, or else is possible to operate very long vacuum tubes but

operating at much lower voltages.

Back to the schematics

and some condensers provide a user variable voltage through RV0 to recharge a 12 volt battery

B1.

This assembly is there for historic reasons, being the low power transformer my original and

very inefficient power source in my early experiments with the test rig.

This

item is

generated

ultimately

power

is

not

cycled

needed

back

to

once

the

recharge

machine

operates

indefinitively

the

the

way

battery

it

should,

without

an

as

the

external

recharge circuit.

The battery B1 feeds an automotive ignition coil IC 01, the coil is fed with a pulsating current

regulated by the switch S3, which is power mosfet based and whose operating frequency is

controlled by a multivibrator MV3. Also a ballast resistor R3 is provided in case multiple power

mosfets in series are required in order to protect the switch from overvoltages.

These switching overvoltages can also be mitigated by condenser C4 which can be gradually

inserted into the circuit by means of variable resistor RV4.

The ignition coil IC 01 then generates a spark across the spark gap AB, with electrons leaving

tip A and charging toward tip B.

The spark gap can be in air or in vacuum, being the optimal kinetic energy of electrons reaching

in B the main operating parameter of the system.

A stable 1 cm spark in air at 0.5 - 5.0 Hz is currently being targeted as design operating

condition of my inverter.

Upon impact in B, a part of the electrons are converted into superelectrons, also an intense

EMP radiation is to be expected and needs to be shielded by means of some metal armors A1.

The superelectrons generated on the armor A1 are also recycled to the secondary/receiving

wire.

Back to my first test runs, this unshielded EMP radiation was causing the condensers of the

battery charger to arc from their metallic top head all the way to the wooden board on which

they were mounted, and this with a spark gap SG01 only few mm long.

The superelectric current generated in B and A1 is then passed through a bulb L1 and then to a

ground in air G2 which exploits the tip effect of metallic fine wire to disperse the electrons in air.

This is obviously a very inefficient ground and can be rather bulky, but should the superelectric

tension be high enough, it is expected to radiate superelectrons in air similarly to what Tesla

experimented.

Looking

back

at

the

sophistication

of

the

experimental

apparatuses

deployed

by

Tesla

generate lighting balls, I do not expect this artificial ground to exhibit any noticeable effect.

to

Principle of operation of the inverter

negatively charge itself, electrons tends therefore to exit the conductor.

Also the secondary/receiving wire B will exhibit extremely low voltages upon receiving the

electrons and superelectrons from A, which could be exploited for energy generation (ie lighting

the two bulbs L1 and L2).

Bulbs and other low pressure gasses should ionize and lit even when not connected by any

wire, by means of the EMP radiation generated around the spark gap.

Bulbs can also be connected to a wire in which superelectrons are present (but not necessarily

flowing).

To remember that once the superelectrons have reverted back to a normal electron state, these

conductors will revert back to their original potential or even above 0 potential in case electrons

have been vented out of the conductor during the low voltage phase.

The power recycle circuit

spark gap SG3 is also present to safeguard the primary circuit from unshielded EMP radiation

which might cause damage to the primary side of the inverter.

During the low voltage spike, the electrons are being converted into superelectrons and the

secondary will negatively charge itself. A variable resistor RV62 controls the flow of electrons

from the secondary circuit to the ground and ultimately determines the charge voltage of a bank

of condensers C62.

During this phase electrons are leaving the circuit through diode D62A and also electrons are

pushed out of the condenser C62 thorugh diode D62C.

After some time (seconds? milliseconds?), the superelectrons generated in the spark event will

revert back to normal electrons and the secondary circuit will now exhibit a positive voltage in

the measure of the number of electrons passed through D62A in the previous phase,

Eventually the conductor will be forced to stay at a close to 0 (ground voltage) by means of

diode D62B.

The positive charges accumulated on the plates of condenser C62 are now pushed out of the

condenser through diode D62D, back to the primary circuit, in order to recharge the battery B1

which generated the spark event to begin with.

Differences between circuit 01C and 01D

then it will be possible to completely disconnect battery B1 and the system will still keep running

and supporting its internal or other external loads without any external power source connected

to it.

From an energy saving and overrunity perspective, it is important to maintain the ON period of

the ignition coil as short as possible regardless of the length of the OFF period, compatibly with

the charge time of the inductor inside IC 01 (schematic 01C).

From a practical point of view, Edwin Gray kept the batteries on his inverters and motors since

these can effectively replace large banks of condensers and are ultimately never discharged

and always in a full charged condition so it will be possible to modify the schematic in rev 01D.

Here the battery is connected through a diode DB which replaces the previous switch S1B.

Also a new variable resistor R2B modulates the recharge time of the battery and avoids the

condenser C62 to fully discharge on the battery itself at each event.

Ideally we should try to operate the condenser at voltages as high as possible, also in order to

reduce charge time of inductor IC01 and thus increasing the operating frequency of the system

at values far greater than a standard 12 volt system would.

Questions?
This free energy inverter of mine is meant to be an open source project and as such it will not

possible to patent it, chiefly because a commercial offer has been made and the principle of

operation disclosed (see my page on Kickstarter.com).

This project eventually relies on other peers to review my work, throw in suggestions or even

experiment the principle of operation themselves.

It is not about who gets there first, but about getting there together as a species!

I look forward to receive your feedback.

Peter Foss

Inverter schematics