Distance Educ in The Phil
Distance Educ in The Phil
Distance Educ in The Phil
http://www.AsianJDE.org
2013 The Asian Society of Open and Distance Education
ISSN 1347-9008 Asian J D E 2013 vol 11, no 1, pp 59 - 77
ABSTRACT :
In today's globalization and rapid technological advancements, dramatic changes have
been happening in higher education, e.g. the dearth of resources for classroom-based
instruction, the development of the open and distance learning philosophy, the need to
service the needs of adult learners and many other factors which are the reality in the
Philippines today. As a consequence, higher education institutions have been increasingly
flexible to adjust their delivery system in an effort to respond to these changes. Distance
Education (DE) has emerged as a legitimate alternative learning system (ALS) to the more
traditional educational system in a number of higher education institution (HEIs) in the
Philippines.
Under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article XIV mandates that quality education at
every level should be made accessible to all Filipinos, including self-learning, independent,
and out-of-school youth programs. Thus, the Open University systems and distance
education ideology has proliferated in the Philippines over recent years especially in the last
two (2) decadesw. This is considered as one of the most rapidly growing fields and means of
education; such that it changes the approaches used; the delivery system; faculty
requirements; and the need to respond to the rare breed of students which are being catered
to by this type of educational arrangement. The objective of this paper is to assess how
distance education/open learning evolved in the Philippines and see how it responds to
making education accessible and flexible to many Filipinos. The laws/issuances given by the
government will also be looked into to determine how the government supports this new
educational philosophy. Further, this research will look into the characteristics of learners
studying in some distance education institutions. Generally, this paper will look into current
trends, challenges and prospects in DE in the Philippines.
Key words: distance education, open learning, adult learners, adult education, higher
education institutions
A.
BASIC
FACTS
PHILIPPINE EDUCATION
ABOUT
59
60
B.
OPEN AND DISTANCE
LEARNING IN THE PHILIPPINES
AND ITS LEGAL BASES
It was during the last two (2) decades that
the concept of distance education, open
learning, alternative learning systems
(ALS) was officially introduced in higher
education (and even in the basic
education) in the Philippines. In fact, the
first issuance from the Commission on
Higher Education (CHED) about it came
out in the year 2000. However, as early
as 1987, when the new constitution has to
be put in place (as a consequence of
people power revolution in 1986), the
concept of non-formal education, selflearning, independent learning/study
programs was already introduced to
respond to the call to make education
accessible to many Filipinos. The
evolution of laws and issuances that
relates to distance education, open
learning and alternative learning system
and recently the concept of transnational
education in higher education; is best
illustrated in the following figure:
61
62
63
64
(1)The
Expanded
Tertiary
Equivalency and Accreditation
Programs
(ETEEAP)
a
comprehensive
program
of
identifying, assessing and assigning
equivalent college level learning for
non-formal and informal training,
and
demonstrated/substantiated
competencies, skills, attitudes and
values acquired from related work
experience towards the final
granting of equivalent credits and/or
awarding of appropriate academic
degree by deputized higher
education institutions. Competency
enhancement
programs
are
employed to ensure progression of
the individual student in the
Program.
(2)Ladderized Education refers to
all
education
and
training
mechanisms that allow students
and workers progression within
and between Technical Vocational
Education and Training (TVET)
and Higher Education (HE).
65
To develop a system of
continuing
education
for
sustaining professional growth
and improving technical skills
especially for those who cannot
leave their jobs or homes for fulltime studies; and
poverty
alleviation,
global
competitiveness
and
sustainable
development, for the benefit of the
present and future generations of
Filipinos.
The PUP Open University was
established in the 1970's. The initial
offerings were non-degree (technicalvocational) courses. PUP first thought of
the Open University concept when then
PCC President Nemesio E. Prudente saw
the need to provide access to educational
opportunities to millions of Filipinos who
wanted to study but were constrained by
time, distance and other circumstances.
He was assisted by then Assistant Vice
President for Branches and Head of the
OU and now Vice President for Academic
Affairs Dr. Samuel M. Salvador together
with Prof. Teofilo H. Montemayor. They
worked relentlessly in establishing
linkages with different organizations and
laid down the foundations of the OU
system in PUP. However, the initial
implementation fizzled out when Martial
Law was declared in 1972.
When Dr. Prudente was reinstated as PUP
President in 1986, he again revived the
concept of the Open University System. It
was formally launched in March 1990.
Dr. Prudente and Dr. Salvador believed in
bringing education right at the doorsteps
of the people. This concept was supported
fully by Dr. Zenaida A. Olonan during her
presidency. The appointment of Dr.
Ofelia M. Carague as president of PUP in
1998 augured well for the PUP OU since
she has been one of the prime movers of
the OU in the University. In the
presidency of Dr. Dante G. Guevarra, the
PUP OU has grown leaps and bounds as it
established the three schools that
presently compose it. While broadcastbased distance learning systems in the
Philippines were popular in the 1960's, it
was PUP which first implemented the
concept of the Open University, that is, a
university within a university offering
both degree and non-degree programs in
the
country
duly
certified
by
corresponding certificates or diplomas
upon satisfactory compliance of course
requirements.
66
68
(6) Central Luzon State University The CLSU Open University was formally
created on August 29, 1997 through
CLSU Board of Regents Resolution No.
50-97. The mandate of the CLSU Open
University is to provide education
opportunities via degree and non-degree
programs to disadvantaged individuals
aspiring for higher education or for
improved qualifications but who are
unable to avail of the traditional modes of
instruction. The CLSU Open University is
open as to people, places, and methods. Its
main aim is to provide access to higher
education to more people, to bring
education to them, wherever they live,
which in turn requires it to apply/adopt
different methods because it cannot
achieve its aims through traditional
classroom teaching. Its mission is to
provide its students with opportunities to
earn formal qualification as well as to
develop in them the readiness for lifelong
learning in today's knowledge society.
Guided and propelled by the general
objective of backstopping CLSU in
undertaking efforts to make more
meaningful contribution to the realization
of the goals of national development
through human resource development, the
OU trains its efforts and resources
towards the achievement of the following
specific objectives, to wit: (1) Offer
programs that are responsive to the needs
of the learners and of their communities
through
distance
education;
(2)
Institutionalize a system of continuing
education to sustain professional growth
69
(8)
Philippine eLearning Society
(PeLS) PeLS was founded on July 30,
2003 in Manila with the objective of
promoting
substantive
content,
appropriate pedagogy, and appropriate
use of technology for eLearning, guided
by ongoing research activities. Its
mission is to lead the development of
eLearning
competencies
through
education and training and to promote
collaboration
among
eLearning
practitioners. Its vision is to be a
recognized premiere organization that
spearheads
the
advancement
of
eLearning in the Philippines (PeLS,
2012).
E. CURRENT TRENDS ON DE IN
THE COUNTRY
As discussed at the earlier part, the
prominence of DE in the country is evident
during the past two decades although there
were efforts to provide education via
distance as early as 1940s and 1950s
through the provision of short courses on
the radio and television. This is to make
70
University,
UP
Open
University
Foundation Inc., and the Philippines
Society for Distance Learning. (Canas,
2012). The rationale for conducting such
conference is as follows: In the 21st
century,
open
learning,
distance
education, and e-learning are inextricably
linked. The philosophy of open learning,
with its emphasis on learner control over
the time, place and pace of study, has
animated distance education since its
emergence as a mode of educational
provision. Distance education in turn has
contributed much to making educational
systems more open and flexible, through
its adoption of various education
technologies. Online distance education
in particular, has proven to be a
transformative
influence,
as
it
demonstrates how the use of information
and communication technologies can reshape the teaching and learning
transaction.Open, distance and e-learning
(ODeL) has revolutionized the way we
perceive universities and the role of
education in development. It has
contributed to the making of a borderless
world driven by innovation and
knowledge
creation
for
policy
development, advocacy, and community
transformation
and
action.This
conference focused on the convergence of
philosophies,
pedagogies
and
technologies in ODeL, the opportunities
opened up by this convergence in
education and beyond, as well as issues
and challenges arising from the practice
of ODeL in various contexts(ICODeL,
2012).
2. The formation of the Philippines
Society for Distance Learning, Inc. in
2006 the PSDL is the 3rd association of
DE providers in the country that was
recently organized. The first two are
ODLF and PeLS. see details in D.9.
about the PSDL.
1.
The Conduct of the First
International Conference on Open and
Distance e-Learning in 2012. Recently in
February 2012, the First International
Conference on Open and Distance eLearning (ICODeL) was held in Century
Park Hotel in Manila wherein close to three
hundred delegates from about 20 countries
and over 100 institutions and organizations
attended said event. ICODEL 2012 was
jointly organized by the UP Open
71
Open
University
was
recently
associated with UNESCO Asia Pacific
Open and Distance Learning Knowledge
Base. The knowledge base for policy
makers in education is an initiative of the
UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional
Bureau for Education. Through this
knowledge base, regional and crosssector development of open and distance
learning by sharing resources, knowledge
and technologies of learning is
encourage. This knowledge base also
hopes to enhance the thrust for
educational accessibility and intellectual
freedom through efficient organisation
and
management
of
educational
endeavour in every country in the region.
The Asia Pacific Open and Distance
Learning Knowledge Base is committed
to the provision of free and fair access to
information on open and distance
education and to enhance educational
training and development through the use
of learning technologies. In the face of
current trends, global changes and new
pathways in education, this knowledge
base aims to provide policy makers with
a comprehensive knowledge base on the
various aspects of open and distance
learning (ODL). UNESCO Asia Pacific
Open and Distance Learning Knowledge
Base perceive that open learning and
distance education can provide for the
training and development needs of every
citizen of the world. In terms of the need
for openness and flexibility, we consider
this approach to be significant in
achieving the Millennium Development
Goals forwarded by the United Nations
in the year 2001. In order to transform
the condition of human life in the 21st
century, the Asia Pacific Open and
Distance Learning Knowledge Base aims
to achieve the following goals: (1) To
provide information that will help policy
makers and decision makers formulate
policies, develop strategies, programmes
and plans to efficiently manage ODL
programmes; (2) To offer current and
state-of-the-art
information
on
implementing ODL with reference to
teaching-learning methodology, modes
of delivery, media, learning technologies
72
Baseline
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Literacy
Simple Literacy Rate (10 yrs. old and above)a/
95.6 (2008)
98.1
86.4 (2008)
90.1
19.45
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
68.41
74.73
81.05
87.36
93.68
100.00
100.00
48.23
58.58
68.94
79.29
89.65
100.00
100.00
67.40
73.92
80.44
86.96
93.48
100.00
100.00
Care Service
Elementary
Net Intake Rate in Grade 1b/
Gross Enrolment Rateb/
58.61
65.89
73.17
80.44
87.72
95.00
100.00
105.37
108.30
111.22
114.15
117.07
120.00
122.93
88.09
90.09
92.09
94.10
96.10
98.10
100.00
74.38
76.45
78.51
80.57
82.64
84.67
86.76
Completion Rated/
72.18
75.13
76.61
78.09
79.56
81.04
82.52
68.0
70.9
71.7
72.5
73.3
74.2
75.0
81.03
86.83
92.62
98.41
104.21
110.00
115.79
59.52
65.16
70.79
76.43
82.06
87.70
93.34
78.44
79.35
80.27
81.18
82.09
83.00
83.91
Completion Rated/
73.74
74.25
74.51
74.76
75.02
75.27
75.53
45.6
54.6
58.7
62.7
66.8
70.9
75.0
1,568,617*
1,100,00
1,210,00
1,331,00
1,464,000
1,610,51
1,771,56
531,300
586,850
649,528
TVET
Enrolment
Male
Female
Graduates
Male
893,091
720,288
805,255
885,780
1,091,555
568,700
623,150
681,472
743,712
805,255
885,780
1,344,371*
1,000,00
1,100,00
1,210,00
1,331,000
1,464,10
1,610,51
856,708
494,000
545,600
602,580
664,169
732,050
805,255
Female
1,047,085
506,000
554,400
607,420
666,831
732,050
805,255
772,670*
600,000
660,000
726,000
798,600
878,460
966,306
636,689*
510,000
564,300
624,360
690,789
764,260
845,518
(2010)
Certification Rate (%)
82.40*
85.00
85.50
86.00
86.50
87.00
87.50
13,406
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
2,770,965
2,881,35
2,955,94
3,021,05
3,080,827
3,155,61
3,220,98
1,335,88
1,361,39
Higher Education
Enrolment
1,388,337
1,418,06
1,445,24
1,692,490
1,737,55
1,775,74
Male
1,255,839
1,305,17
0
Female
1,515,126
1,576,18
1,620,06
1,659,66
Graduates
481,026
509,707
524,054
538,397
552,735
567,083
581,425
Male
206,015
219,503
226,249
232,994
239,737
246,482
253,228
Female
275,011
290,204
297,805
305,403
312,998
320,601
328,197
% Masters Degree
35.04
40
45
50
55
60
65
% Doctorate Degree
9.69
10
13
16
20
25
30
20
20
23
26
29
32
35
200
800
800
800
800
800
800
42,000
44,000
44,000
44,000
44,000
44,000
44,000
34 (2008)
30
32
34
36
38
40
36.26
45.84
47.04
48.39
49.72
50.94
52.53
Faculty Qualification
Accreditation
Percent of higher education institutions with accredited
programs
Expanded Tertiary Accreditation and Equivalency
Program (ETEEAP) Graduates
Student Financial Assistance Programs (STUFAPs)
Number of HE beneficiaries
Percent of higher education institutions with Ladderized
Education Program (LEP)
National Passing Percentage in Licensure Exams
73
F. CHALLENGES
The Philippine Development Plan 20112016 provides that: :[t]he challenge for
the tertiary education is not just
broadening but rationalizing the access
of the economically and sociallydisadvantaged and potentially-restive
population. Particularly, the efficacy,
usefulness and viability of student loan
programs have not improved remarkably
through the years. Significantly, the
need to produce enough competent
and skilled workforce that will match
domestic needs has become much
more compelling. Faced with the
challenge of competitiveness and the
diversifying industry needs, the
government
continuously instituted
programs and provided the critical
resources for skills upgrading and
intensification in both high- and middlelevel professions. Post-basic education
funding has pointed to the need for
students to be channeled to fields that
G. PROSPECTS
Among the many prospects that the
government will take (as enunciated in
the Policies and Strategies in Education,
Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016)
which generally relates to distance
education, open learning, alternative
learning system and transnational
education are as follows:
1. Make education and training truly
inclusive and expand opportunities for
lifelong learning through: (a) better
and broader provision of basic
educational inputs, especially in
traditionally lagging areas by using
Alternative Learning Systems (ALS) for
out-of-school youths and adults;
74
References:
1987 Republic
Constitution
of
the
Philippine
76
UNESCO
(2004).
Asia
Pacific
Knowledge Base on Open and
Distance Learning, (Introduction,
Mission Statement and Goals).
Online available at http://asiapacificodl2.oum.edu.my/ODL/index_unesco
.asp accessed on 15 July 2012.
University of the Philippines Open
University Vision (2012). Online
available at
http://www2.upou.edu.ph/aboutus/upou-vision-and-mission,
accessed on 13 June 2012.
77