1) The document reviews the documentary film "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" which depicts the life and death of Aaron Swartz, an internet activist who was prosecuted for downloading academic journal articles.
2) Swartz believed information on the internet should be freely accessible, and broke laws to make it so. He was charged with several felonies related to accessing a protected computer network and faced 35 years in prison.
3) The reviewer argues the film could have been improved by including perspectives from the government and prosecutors to provide more balance, and by depicting support organizations that aided Swartz's activism against laws restricting internet freedom.
1) The document reviews the documentary film "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" which depicts the life and death of Aaron Swartz, an internet activist who was prosecuted for downloading academic journal articles.
2) Swartz believed information on the internet should be freely accessible, and broke laws to make it so. He was charged with several felonies related to accessing a protected computer network and faced 35 years in prison.
3) The reviewer argues the film could have been improved by including perspectives from the government and prosecutors to provide more balance, and by depicting support organizations that aided Swartz's activism against laws restricting internet freedom.
1) The document reviews the documentary film "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" which depicts the life and death of Aaron Swartz, an internet activist who was prosecuted for downloading academic journal articles.
2) Swartz believed information on the internet should be freely accessible, and broke laws to make it so. He was charged with several felonies related to accessing a protected computer network and faced 35 years in prison.
3) The reviewer argues the film could have been improved by including perspectives from the government and prosecutors to provide more balance, and by depicting support organizations that aided Swartz's activism against laws restricting internet freedom.
1) The document reviews the documentary film "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz" which depicts the life and death of Aaron Swartz, an internet activist who was prosecuted for downloading academic journal articles.
2) Swartz believed information on the internet should be freely accessible, and broke laws to make it so. He was charged with several felonies related to accessing a protected computer network and faced 35 years in prison.
3) The reviewer argues the film could have been improved by including perspectives from the government and prosecutors to provide more balance, and by depicting support organizations that aided Swartz's activism against laws restricting internet freedom.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
The Internets own Boy: A Review
Course: SOC473A Sociology of Globalization
Submitted to: Prof. Jillet Sam (13295)
by Harshit Lathi Date: 30 September 2016 th
Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to obey them, or shall we
endeavor to amend them and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Henry David Thoreau These words in the opening scene seem to depict Brian Knappenbergers belief in the cause of his subject in The Internets Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz. Swartz was the young man who refused to obey "unjust laws" and he was essentially killed after he chose to transgress them. A government turned trigger-happy by the WikiLeaks scandal and a general sense that they could no longer control the dissemination of information in the internet age threatened the technologically pioneering Swartz through over-prosecution, bringing charges that could have landed him in jail for 35 years. Completely shattered at not just the prospect of being labeled a felon for the rest of his life but the betrayal of institutions that should have defended him (like MIT), Swartz committed suicide at the age of 26. The movie depicts the entire life of Aaron Swartz (1986-2013). The main plot revolves around the years of 2010-2013 since he became research fellow at Harvard University. This was the time when the world was recovering from the Financial Crisis of 2007-08 and after the attacks of 9/11 the United States Secret Service became very powerful. Swartz was caught on video for stealing data from the MIT and JSTOR, a not-for-profit archive of scientific journals and academic work. He was charged in an indictment with wire fraud, unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer, and recklessly damaging a protected computer. The government, understanding the issue of national security through the internet, wanted to take control of the internet if not shut it down. Also, various documents that should have been made public were handed to private companies so they can generate revenue over it. The government came up with a SOPA bill. The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was a bill to expand the ability of U.S. law enforcement to combat online copyright infringement and online trafficking in counterfeit goods. It was thoroughly fought by Aaron and his team and eventually defeated. The prosecutors and federal agents saw an opportunity to set an example through Aarons case against the computer hackers. This was an effort to strengthen the Computer Fraud and Abuse act.
The movie depicts a nice combination of sociological concepts. But if I would
have to remake the movie, I would have made it with several other concepts too. One of them would be to present the point of view of the nation state (American government) as well as the organizations such as the FBI or the Secret Service. The movie has scenes of different activists who expressed their views on how Aaron was right and how the government was against internet being available to everyone. It should have included the views of prosecutors and federal agents on why was Aaron being targeted for such a small crime? Or was that really a small crime? This would have made the movie more of a judge-it-yourself kind of a thing rather than the director showing us one side of the story and making an opinion about who is right. Another concept that could have been used is to show the efforts of different organizations that stood with Aaron Swartz through the period of protest against the government taking away the freedom of common people from them and charge money for fundamental documents that they have all the right to access for free. In the protest against SOPA around 7000 websites coordinated a service blackout. This online community played an important part in the protest. Similarly, various other NGOs were there with Aaron to protest against the bill. These organizations played an important role defeating the bill. More interviews could have been done with the people that supported Aaron and show the impact of different organizations into shaping the new reforms in a nation state. These two concepts could have been used to make the movie better. The movie definitely connects private troubles and public issues. The people felt that the articles of journals and legal materials. This was a public issue since people had to pay to access the documents that should have been given for free. While on the other hand, the government felt it was only Aarons problem and people were not bothered to pay the amount for the documents. Therefore, they went up against him pitching him as the criminal of the society. The film really presents Aaron Swartz as a modern-day martyr for the cause of an open access to the internet that he deeply believed in and dedicated himself to. Perhaps because of his recent and tragic death the filmmaker seems unwilling to question the ethics of Aaron's hacker-like tactics. There really aren't any voices raising serious questions about whether his efforts to take the law into his own hands by downloading millions of documents was truly an appropriate form of civil disobedience. He did, in fact, steal millions of articles and violate intellectual property rights through his actions. He undoubtedly believed that what he was doing was right and just.
References:
Brian Knappenberger. 2014. The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of
Aaron Swartz. Luminant Media Unjustsus Films. Ritzer, George. Globalization: A Basic Text.Wiley-Blackwell.2010.Print Tallerico, Brian. "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story Of Aaron Swartz Movie Review (2014) | Roger Ebert". Rogerebert.com. N.p., 2014. Web. 29 Sept. 2016.