The Effect of Aluminum Oxide, Iron Oxide On The Thermal Conductivity of (Epoxy-Aluminum Oxide, Epoxy-Iron Oxide) Composites
The Effect of Aluminum Oxide, Iron Oxide On The Thermal Conductivity of (Epoxy-Aluminum Oxide, Epoxy-Iron Oxide) Composites
The Effect of Aluminum Oxide, Iron Oxide On The Thermal Conductivity of (Epoxy-Aluminum Oxide, Epoxy-Iron Oxide) Composites
- )
( -
/ /
:
.
) (
.
composite properties [2, 3]. The particle
fillers are distributed randomly in the
matrix material, this type of
distribution led the properties of
composite material being anisotropic.
The gross of particle sizes (greater than
1m) decrease the ratio of homogenate
of composite material, also decrease
the strengthening. It is evident that
thermo physical properties of the filled
composites are anisotropic, except for
Introduction
In order to obtain materials of
desired thermal, mechanical and
electrical properties. Fillers may be in
the form of fibers or in the form of
particles uniformly distributed in the
polymer matrix material [1] . The
choice of particle fillers depends on the
desired properties. Also we can note
here the size and geometry of particle
filler is an important role in the
114
M. K. Jawad
the very short randomly distributed
fibers. Whereas, thermo physical
properties of particle filled polymer are
isotropic. Many theoretical, numerical
and experimental studies exist about
thermal conductivity of micrometer
sized particles and fiber filled polymer
composites.
Material Used
Two types of filler were used ,
Al2O3 and Fe2O3,Epoxy resin used to
form composite materials.
Composites Preparation
In order to obtain a composite,
Al2O3 and Fe2O3 filler should be added
to epoxy resin in the filler range from
(10%, 20%, 40% and 50%) by weight
ratio. Hand lay out method was used to
prepare specimens as discs with
diameter (2cm).
115
(pr
M. K. Jawad
thermal conductivity. Also we can see
from Fig. (3) that the value of thermal
conductivity of epoxy filled with
Fe2O3 is less than of epoxy filled with
Al2O3 which they have the same
weight ratio of filler , because the
thermal conductivity of Fe2O3 is 12.5
W/m.k. [11] which lead to reduce the
value of thermal conductivity of EP/
Fe2O3 composite .
0.7
0.6
K (W /m .k.)
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0%
Sandw ish
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Precent of filler to Ep
Conclusions
1- It found that increasing the weight
ratio of Al2O3 and Fe2O3 lead to
increase in the values of thermal
conductivity, but the epoxy
composite filled with Fe2O3, have
values of thermal conductivity less
than for epoxy composite filled
with Al2O3, for the same weight
ratio.
2- Thermal conductivity calculated
for epoxy composite by contact to
every
two
specimens
(like
sandwich) content same weight
ratio of alumina-oxide and ferriteoxide, its found that the value of
thermal conductivity lays between
the values of epoxy filled with
Al2O3 and of epoxy filled with
Fe2O3.
0.7
0.6
K(W/m.K.)
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Al2o3 +Ep
0.1
Fe2O3+Ep
0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
References
[1] Putnam, S. A. ,David G.Cahili,
D. G. , Ash, B. J. &Schadler, L.
S. (2003),High precision thermal
conductivity measurements as a
probe of polymer/nanoparticle
interfaces.
[2] M.M. Bever, "Encyclopedia of
Materials
Science
and
Engineering". Vol. 3, Pergamon
Press ,LTD. New York,(1986).
[3] H. I. Jaffer "Investigation of
Interlaminar
Toughness
of
Reinforced Polymer Blends"
PhD. Thesis University of
Baghdad,(2000).
60%
percent of filler to Ep
117
[4]
118