130108ZeroPositionalTol PDF
130108ZeroPositionalTol PDF
130108ZeroPositionalTol PDF
(408) 2515329
2X .535
4.00
4.00
2.000
2.000
1.000
5.000
1.000
5.000
6.00
6.00
.XX = .01
.XXX = .005
ANGLES = 1
.040
.040
Location Tollerence
Specified
Size Tolerance
Specified
.020
.000
.500
.520
.540
.020
.000
.500 .520
.540
Hole Diameter
Hole Diameter
Figure 7-17 Plus or minus location tolerance compared with zero positional
tolerance.
Zero tolerance is never used without an MMC or LMC modifier. Zero at RFS would, in fact, be a
zero tolerance no matter what size the feature is manufactured. Where zero positional tolerance at
MMC is specified, the tolerance that applies to the feature being controlled is the bonus tolerance.
In many cases, the bonus is larger than the tolerance that otherwise might be specified in the feature
control frame. An analysis of the part in Fig. 7-17B indicates that the holes can be produced
anywhere between .500 and .540 in diameter. If the holes are actually produced at a diameter of
.535, the total location tolerance available is a cylindrical tolerance zone of .035 in diameter.
1
Cogorno, Gene R., Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing for Mechanical Design, Second
Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2011, p. 121
Technical Training Consultants
(408) 251-5329
http://www.ttc-cogorno.com
The actual hole size, .535, minus the MMC, .500, equals a bonus tolerance of .035. GD&T reflects
the exact tolerance available. For the drawing in Fig. 7-17A, the size of the holes must be between a
diameter of .530 and .540. If the holes are produced at .535 in diameter, the total location tolerance
available is actually a cylindrical tolerance zone of .035, just as it is in Fig.7-17B. However,
because the title block tolerance is specified at .005, the inspector can accept the part only if the
axes of the holes fall within their respective tolerance zones, which are .010 square. In this case, a
tolerance of at least .025 is wasted. Tolerance is money, and no one wants to waste money!
2X .500-.540
2X .520-.540
4.00
4.00
2.000
2.000
1.000
5.000
1.000
5.000
6.00
6.00
.XX = .01
.XXX = .005
ANGLES = 1
.040
.040
.020
.020
.000
.000
.500
.520
.500 .520
.540
Hole Diameter
A
.540
Hole Diameter
B
(408) 251-5329
http://www.ttc-cogorno.com
Drawing B
.535
.520
.535
.500
Bonus
Geometric Tolerance
.015
+ .020
.035
+ .000
.035
.035
Virtual Condition
Drawing A
Drawing B
.520
.020
.500
.000
.500
.500
Table 7-3 Both the total positional tolerance and the virtual condition are the
same whether controlled with a numerical tolerance or zero positional tolerance
at MMC
Suppose that a part is to be inspected with the drawing in Fig. 7-18A. The part has been plated a
little too heavily, and the actual size of both holes is .518 in diameter. The inspector has to reject the
part because the holes are too small. Suppose that both holes were located within a cylindrical
tolerance zone of .010. Would the part assemble? The answer to this question can be determined by
inspecting the part to the equivalent zero positional tolerance the drawing in Fig. 7-18B. The hole
size of .518 in diameter is acceptable because it falls between .500 and .540 in diameter. The
location tolerance equals the bonus, which is the hole size, .518, minus MMC, .500, or a cylindrical
tolerance zone .018 in diameter. The part will fit and function because only a location tolerance
of .010 in diameter is required. Is it acceptable to scrap perfectly good parts? If this is a continuing
problem for a particular part, submit an engineering change order converting the tolerance to a zero
positional tolerance.
2X .520 .540
2X ._ _ _ .540
2X .500 .540
(408) 251-5329
http://www.ttc-cogorno.com