Mesh Networking and AREDN
Mesh Networking and AREDN
Mesh Networking and AREDN
i i}>`,
4
hirty years ago, packet networking was the worldwide email system that, while slow, worked
new in thing. Many of us marveled at our reliably and is credited with saving many lives in
ability to communicate digitally over hundreds bad situations.
of miles using little more than an HT, computer ter-
minal, and TNC by traversing the network. Net/ (3--
ROM, TheNET, TexNet, and ROSE were the choic- Later, HSMM (high-speed multimedia) networking
es available for firmware, and each had its advan- became a thing, and folks started using low-cost
tages. Later, such systems as Germanys FlexNet and readily-available consumer-grade 802.11
increased the utility of these networks, and hams (Wi-Fi) equipment to traverse short distances at
by the thousands were drawn into the digital age. very high speeds. Several standard 2.4-GHz Wi-
Commercial competition was in the form of dial-up Fi channels are on frequencies shared with hams,
bulletin board systems and pay services such as so the modems could be modified to operate under
CompuServe, America Online, and others. FCC Part 97 rules rather than the more restrictive
Around that time, the internet formed, and the Part 15 rules. The idea was that for temporary sit-
rapid rise of reliable and inexpensive broadband uations, hams could offer excellent compatibility
access to the World Wide Web proved too tempt- with existing applications and equipment, deliver-
ing. Tunnels through the Internet were used to ing last mile connectivity in a seamless and
expand packet networks (to their eventual detri- transparent manner. Larger networks could be
ment), and some decided that 128 kb/s DSL built, since deploying many devices wasnt a finan-
access was far superior to 1200 baud. And so, the cial issue, unlike packet.
radio was leaving packet radio networking, as The problem, as it always has been, is finding
were its users. enough sites to make the network usable. Sure,
But packet never really died. It proved valuable there are a few hams in almost every town, but not
for emergency communications (EmComm), even everyone is interested in participating. Consumer-
at 300-baud speeds on HF bands, because it was grade Wi-Fi networking equipment also has a lim-
far faster than anything else available. The APRS ited range not because of power (tens of milli-
(Automatic Packet Reporting System) phenome- watts), but due to built-in 802.11 networking
non had many hams repurposing their terminal firmware that requires the receiving station to
node controllers (TNCs) to mobile and tactical acknowledge receiving data within a certain time-
uses, including EmComm. And WinLink 2000 frame. If the ACK doesnt come soon enough, the
combined internet, VHF, and HF radio to build a sender assumes it was lost and re-sends. Thats
good, unless the ACK time is shorter than the
speed-of-light delay well encounter over dis-