Comments: Concerns(Improve or Standards/Cri Advanced/Exceeded Comments:

Student(Evidence Remediate) teria Standards Teacher

/ (ERWC)
Standards met)

I should have reread Reading:

the articles more Determine two
calmly to understand or more central
more about what was ideas of a text
being said. I may and analyze
have known what it their
was about but development
understanding the over the
actual concept of the course of the
article would have text, including
helped me. how they
interact and
build on one
another to
provide a
complex
analysis;
provide an
objective
summary to
the text.

I dont think I met the Writing: Write

standard for the narratives to
writing because on develop real or
answering questions imagined
from a university I experiences or
chose, the answers events using
were not as in depth effective
as I intended for them techniques,
to be. I am sure that I well-chosen
did not write about details, and
well developed well-structured
experiences with event
detail. sequences.

On the speech I The only concern for Speaking and

do think that I met this section was the Listening:
the standards in tone. I think the tone Evaluate a
choosing certain used could have been speaker's point
words that would more persuasive and of view,
make the different words could reasoning, and
audience want to have been chosen to use of
listen. The use of make the audience evidence and
evidence for react with pathos rhetoric,
came from texts more towards the assessing the
that were read in cause. stance,
class. premises, links
among ideas,
word choice,
points of
emphasis, and
tone used.

For the Animal Bill of Writing:

Rights argument Develop
essay I did not meet claim(s) and
the standards. It was counterclaims
hard trying to come up fairly and
with claims or counter thoroughly,
arguments against supplying the
animal captivity or most relevant
testing. I ended up evidence for
using outside sources each
aside from the texts while pointing
but did not cite them out the
in my essay. strengths and
limitations of
both in a
manner that
anticipates the
audience's
knowledge
level,
concerns,
values, and
possible
biases.

From the texts Reading:

that were read in Determine an
class, I was able author's point
to understand the of view or
authors overall purpose in a
purpose and text in which
theme that was in the rhetoric is
their writing. From particularly
the first two texts effective,
of To Be or Not analyzing
to Be, and The how style and
Essential Man it content
can be seen that contribute to
the constant the power,
theme is life and persuasivenes
death. In What is s or beauty of
a Life Worth? it the text.
goes into depth
on how much
people are really
worth after they
have died and the
compensation
that the persons
family will
receive.

I did not met the Writing:

standards for creating Develop the
a topic for the online topic
debate of the Human thoroughly by
Calculator. It was selecting the
difficult for me to most
participate on the significant and
debate became I relevant facts,
could not fill out some extended
parts on the website definitions,
for it therefore I did concrete
not grasp its content details,
to fully answer and quotations, or
come up with a topic other
that could be information
discussed. appropriate to
the audience's
knowledge of
the topic.

For Into the Wild, Reading:

I believe I met the Analyze the
standards in impact of the
analyzing and author's
seeing how the choices
authors choices regarding how
could impact the to develop and
reader. There relate
were many elements of a
relatable scenes story or drama.
that made you
think Something
similar like that
has happened to
me, or I know
someone that
is/was like this.
The author also
changed it up a
bit in not having
the book or
McCandless
story just be
about him.
Instead the
author also talked
about a similar
adventurous
journey that he
experienced
around the same
age as
McCandless.

I know that I met Speaking and

this standard Listening:
because in class Come to
and group discussions
discussions I prepared;
would try to explicitly draw
participate on the on that
questions or the preparation by
chapter overall. In referring to
the discussions, evidence from
especially in texts and other
groups I would research on
bring in a quote the topic or
or a scene in the issue to
chapter to see all stimulate a
the different thoughtful,
opinions from well-reasoned
everyone. exchange of
ideas.