Summons Under CPC
Summons Under CPC
Summons Under CPC
ASSIGNMENT ON
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
SUBMITTED BY
SUBMITTED TO
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Khan who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful Assignment on the topic
1908.which also helped me in doing a lot of Research and I came to know about so many new
things I am really thankful to his. And also thanks to give me extra time for make my
assignment.
I also wish to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher Ifti Hasan Imran for
Secondly I would also like to thank my parents and friends who helped me a lot in finalizing
CONTENTS
1.1 Introduction 01
1.2 Institution of suit 01
1.3 Parties to suit 02
1.4 Summons under the statutory law of Bangladesh 02
1..5 Meaning and definition of Summons 02-03
1.6 Importance of Service of Summons 03
1.7 Object of issuing Summons 04
1.8 Essentials of summons 04
1.9 Purpose of Summons 04-05
2. Issue and Service of Summons 05
2.1 Summons to the defendant 06
2.2 Appearance in person 06
2.3 Exception from appearance in person 06
2.4 Content of Summons 06
Chapter IV Conclusion
4.8 Recommendation 24
4.9 Conclusion 25
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Order V of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in Bangladesh is based on this principle that no
one should be condemned unheard when the suit is instituted against the defendant the court
is bound to serve the summons to defendant for appearing before the court. In fact, the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908 provided procedural rules to administer trial of civil suit from its
institution till its conclusion. After filing of suit, it becomes necessary for that party, which
files suit, to serve summon son opponent party. A summon is a legal document that is issued
by a Court on a person involved in a legal proceeding. When a legal action is taken against a
person or when any person is required to appear in the court as a witness in a proceeding, to
call upon such person and ensure his presence on the given date of the proceeding, summons
are served. A summon is served when a suit has been initiated by the plaintiff against the
defendant, the court directs to issue summons to the defendant as this ensures a fair trial. If
the summons is not duly served then no action can be taken against the defendant. 1 To
constitute a summons a copy of the plaint must be accompanied with it. Mohammadullah vs
Shamsul. 2003 BLD 414: 55 DLR 428.
Section 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 says that every suit must be instituted by
presentation of a plaint or in other prescribed manner. In every plaint, the facts must be
proved by affidavits. Plaint is a private memorial submitted to court in writing in which the
person presents his cause of action. Only the person who has got cause of action or his
authorized representative can institute a suit.2Suit must always be instituted by the
presentation of the plaint only, and hence any civil proceeding commenced by means of an
1 Torab Ali and Others Vs. Madris Ali Saha and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD)
2 Assan v. Pathumma
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
application or otherwise does not become a suit. As per Order V, Rule 1, the plaint must be
submitted in duplicate to the court. Further every plaint must comply with the rules contained
in Order VI and VII. The plaint must show in what capacity the plaintiff sues the defendant.
While submitting the plaint, the Court fee for the service of the plaint along with the
summons must be paid. Copy of the plaint is an integral part of the summons to constitute a
summons within the meaning of the provisions of the Code plaint must be accompanied with
the summons either it be served by the process server or by registered post.3
Rule 1 to 3 of Order I of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 deals with Parties to suit. For
institution of a suit, there must be two parties, a subject in dispute, cause of action and
demand of relief. A suit is instituted by the presentation of a plaint to the court. The plaint
should set out the name of the plaintiff,(if there are more than one plaintiff, the names of
every plaintiff) and the name of the defendant(and if there are more than one defendant, the
names of every defendant)
Section 27 and Order V of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with the service of
summons to the defendant when subject matter of the suit is civil nature and in the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1898 from section 61 to 69 deals with the topic of summons when
subject matter of the case is criminal nature.
In Bangladesh the term summon has not been define in the Code of Civil procedure, 1908-
But the intimation which is sent to defendant by the court is technically known as Summon.
According to the dictionary meaning4, A Summon is a document issued from the office of a
Court of Justice, calling upon the person to whom it is directed to attend before a Judge or
officer of the Court for a certain purposed. No such summons shall be issued when the
defendant has appeared at the presentation of the plaint and admitted the plaintiff's claim.
A summons has been issued; the Court may direct the defendant to file the written statement
of his defense, if any, on the date of his appearance and cause an entry to be made to that
3 Moiammadullah vs Md 55 DLR 428
effect in the summons. In all other cases Summon must be issued and served to defendants. A
summons is an official document which requires a person to give evidence at a Tribunal
hearing or to produce documents or things to the Tribunal. The term once used to describe
such a document was subpoena.
In Foreign country Legally, a summons (also known in England and Wales as a claim form
and in the Australian state of New South Wales as a Court Attendance Notice (CAN)) is a
legal document issued by a court
Finally we can say that when an individual (the plaintiff) files a complaint initiating a
lawsuit against another party (the defendant), he is legally required to inform that party
that he has done so. The summons provides the defendant with the identity of the court in
which the lawsuit has been filed, identifies all of the parties involved in the lawsuit, and
bears the signature and official seal of the court clerk. The summons is served with the
complaint on the defendant, at which point the lawsuit officially begins.
The importance of service of summons, in whatever way it may be effected, is that the
defendant may be informed of the institution of the suit in due time before the date fixed for
the hearing and to extend him an opportunity to resist the suit where the defendant is not
served with summons, the mere fact that he had no knowledge of the suit is immaterial.
There are some important of service of summons7. These are following:
7 Abdul Hamid Chowdhury (Iqbal) and Others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and Others, 2015, 44 CLC (HCD)
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
A party must have a fair and reasonable notice of the legal proceedings initiated
against him, so that he can defend himself.
It may be issued to the defendant to appear and answer the claim and may be served
in manner prescribed.
A summons may be sent by the court by which it is issued.
In every suit heard by a Court of small Causes, the summons shall be for final
disposal of the suit.
1) The summons may be issued to the defendant to issue to the defendant to appear and
answer the claim and to file a written statement within 30 days from the date of service of
summons on him .The defendant has now to file the written statements within 30 days of
service of summons and in case of defendant is not able to file against 30 days the court is
given a discretion to allow the defendant to file the written statement within a maximum
period of 90 days for which the court have to give reasons in writing every summon should
be signed by the judge or the officer appointed by court and shall be sealed,10
2) Without a copy of the plaint no summons is valid. If the summons is not accompanied by a
copy of the plaint or (where so permitted) a copy of the concise statement, it is not a valid
service.11 However when the defendant was not showing any interest to receive a copy of the
8Aid Advice vs. Bar Council of India 1995
9 Takwani C. K., Civil Procedure, 7th ed., Eastern Book Company, 2014 at p. 251.
plaint on the date fixed for supply of copy or on any other date thereafter a plea that the
summons must be accompanied with the plaint is not entertain able12 .
Attendance of witness13
The defendant is also to be directed to produce his witness too, on the date fixed for his
appearance14 with the evidence or documents or other material objects. Court may require
personal attendance of the parties where it sees reason.15
13 Order V rule 8
16 Oder 5 rule 5
17 Narendranarh v amiya choudhary AIR 1959 Cal 231 overrulling mader khan vs Kaiser ali (1958)62 cwn 718
When a suit has been duly filed by presentation of a plaint, the Court must issue Summons to
the defendant calling upon him to appear and answer the claim of the plaintiff by filling a
written statement within thirty days from the date of service of Summons. 20 No summons,
however, will be issued by the court if, at the time of presentation of plaint, the defendant is
present and admits the plaintiffs claim21.
Under the rule 3 deals that a defendant to whom a summons has been issued under sub-rule
(1) may appear-
In person, or
By a pleader duly instructed and able to answer all material questions relating
to the suit, or
By a pleader accompanied by some person able to answer all such questions.
19 Whether This Case Involves A ... vs State Of Gujarat & on 24 March, 2017
20 Immam Hossain Sawdagor and others Vs. Abul Hashem and others, 2015, 44 CLC (AD)
22 Rule 3 of order V
23 A. M Moniruzzaman, Civil Procedure Code, 3rd ed., (Dhaka: Shams Publications, 2007)p.333
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
Unless he resides
(a) Within the local limits of the courts or dinary original jurisdiction.
(b) Outside such limits, but at a place less than 50 miles; or 200 miles (where public
conveyance is available) from the courthouse.
Who is a woman not appearing in public, or
Who is entitled to exemption under the code.
The summons must contain a direction whether the date fixed is for settlement of issues only
or for final disposal of the suit. In the letter case, the defendant should be directed to produce
his witness. The Court must give sufficient time to the defendant to enable him to appear
and answer the claim of the plaintiff on the day fixed. The summons should also contain an
order to the defendant to produce all documents or copies thereof in his possession or power
upon which he intends to rely on in support of his case25.
24 Idib
25 section 27, rule 5-8, order 5, of the code of civil procedure, 1908
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
The object of the service of a summons, in whatever way it may be effected (other than
substituted service to which other consideration apply),is that the defendant may be informed
of the institution of the suit in due time before the date fixed for the hearing and to extend
him an opportunity to resist the suit 27. Where the defendant is not served with summons the
mere fact that he had knowledge of the suit is immaterial28.
26 Takwani C. K., Civil Procedure, 7th ed., Eastern Book Company, 2014 at p. 255.
30 12 BLC (AD)
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
Where no attempt is made to find the defendant and the summons is served. The inquiry as to
the where about of the defendants must not be perfunctory 31. A person who does not reside
within the local jurisdiction of thecourt will be bound by the service of notice on his manager
or agent. Commissioner vs ldris' 19 DLR (SC) 170.Service of notice on a boy who is not an
adult is not valid32The agent's authority to accept summons must be in writing. Hazari vs
Daiba' 26 DLR 3.
Service of notice on the husband of the defendant is not valid service under this rule unless it
is shown that the conditions mentioned in the rule were satisfied 33. When summons intended
for a pradanashin lady tendered to a male member of the family who was separate it was held
not be sufficient34.if a pardanashin lady could not be found and adult members refuse to
35
accept service , copy of notice can be affixed on the front door in the presence of witness S.
27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Summons to defendants.- Where a suit has been
duly instituted, a summons may be issued to the defendant to appear and answer the claim
and may be served in manner prescribed [on such day not beyond thirty days from date of the
institution of the suit].
The words on such date not beyond thirty days from the date of the institution of the suit do
not mean that the summons must be served within thirty days of the date of the institution of
the suit. The words added by amendment, fix outer time frame, by providing, that steps must
be taken within thirty days from the dare of the institution of the suit, to issue summons. In
other words, if the suit is instituted, for example, on 1st Jan, 2002 then the correct addresses
of the defendants and the process fee must be filed in the court within thirty days so that
summons be issued by the court not beyond thirty days from the date of the institution of the
suit. The object is to avoid long delay in issue of summons for want of steps by the plaintiff.
33 Eravi Pillai Vs Maluk Mohammad 1953 ILR Tr & Co 405 AIR 1953
It is quite evident that if all that is required to be done by a party, has been performed within
the period of thirty days, then no fault can be attributed to the party.
Order V of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 deals with summons to defendant. When a suit
has been duly filed by presentation of a plaint, the courts must issue summons to the
defendants calling upon him to appear and answer the claim of the plaintiff by filing a written
statement within thirty days from the date of service of summons and such summons issued
by the court must be accompanied by the copy of the plaint. Such procedure has been duly
provided for in rule 1 and 2 of Order V.
The peon's statement in the returns that finding the defendant absent and he being in Dhaka
for business he served the notice on his brother as agent is not a proper service' Emdad vs '
Habib. or in another case on the respondents mother since she was not his authorised agent.36
In Karnail Singh v. Dina Nath, it was said that it is the requirement of law that summons
must be accompanied by the copy of the plaint and unless it is done, mere presentation of
summon without copy is no service. Hence, if the plaint was not presented along with the
summons, it cannot be said that there was due service. Due Service means service of
summons along with the plaint. Word due has not been superfluously used by the legislature
but attachment of copy of complaint or concise statement thereof along with summons is
mandatory.37
In another case of Sneh Gupta v. Devi Sarup, summons were served on the party after the
date fixed in the suit had expired. The Supreme Court held that the court, in this situation, had
a legal obligation to serve another summons fixing another date of hearing in terms of order
V rule 2 of the CPC.
Where the court is satisfied that there is reason to believe that the defendant is keeping out of
the way for the purpose of avoiding service, or that for any reason the summons cannot be
served in the ordinary way, the court shall order the summons to be served by affixing a copy
36 21 DLR 747
37 Ibid
thereof in some conspicuous place in the court house and also upon some conspicuous part of
the house (if any) in which the defendant is known to have last resided or carried on business
or personally worked for gain, or in such other manner as the court thinks fit. Service may be
ordered to be effected by publication in a local daily newspaper. Service substituted by order
of the court shall be as effectual as if it had been made on the defendant personally. it is not
service in the ordinary sense of the word . its is a artificial proceeding upon a fiction imported
by necessity. Further , it should be effected as a last resorts to it all the conditions laid down
for it must be fulfilled39 and an application for substituted service should not be allowed
automatically40 .service by publication should be ordered when the court is satisfied that
personal service is not possible41. Where the plaintiff knew the where about of the defendant
and in spite of the fact, obtained by a false representation an order for substituted service by
giving the court to understand that the defendant had been deliberately avoiding service it
was held that the defendant had not been properly served42.
Where the order for substituted service was made on the representation that the defendant
has been residing at a particular place when as a matter fact the defendant never resided
there for sometime past and on such representation the court was induced to hold that the
substituted service was properly effected the service was held not to be proper 43 is cast on the
court to summon the defendant and for that purpose to pass appropriate orders under under
the code the duty is cast on the court to summon the defendant and for that purpose to pass
appropriate orders under the rules no duty is cast on the plaintiff to take the summon him
44 45
self and to serve it on the defendant. In a proper case there may be substituted service by
proclarnation in newspapers of long standing Mir vs Pir.
44 Mahbudul Islam: Law of Civil Procedure, ed.2nd , Volume 2 (or 21r. 60 to end)p.432
45 Jai hind timber depot vs Gian Chand AIR 1954 Punj 174
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
2.9Postal service46
Same procedure is followed where summons was properly addressed, prepaid, and duly sent
by registered post, acknowledgement due and the acknowledgement is lost or not received by
the court within 30 days from the date of issue of the summons. Where the summons sent by
registered post is retuned with an endorsement refused, the burden is on the defendant to
prove that the endorsement is false.
Under Order V Rule 10-A of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, a copy of summons would be
sent by registered post. A summons sent by registered post and returned with the endorsement
"refused" is a good and valid service. Shahab vs Abdu. 52 DLR 305. ' A' notice on a
corporation may be served on the Secretary or on the Director or other principal officer at the
Registered Office. But service by hanging the notice on the outer dwelling of the Manager-in-
charge is no service' Mahaluxmi Bankvs Mohammad. 20 DLR 983
Summons sent by registered post with acknowledgment receipt due would be considered duly
served even if acknowledgment is lost or mislaid or not received by the Court. Abdur vs
Shahabuddin 12 BLC (AD) 118.A bare perusal of Order V, Rule 9, CPC clearly shows that
service through process of court is mandatory. Summons to defendant residing within or
outside the jurisdiction of the court shall be served through court officer or approved courier
service or various other means such as registered post, speed post, fax, acknowledgment due,
etc. Further, summons is presumed to be served if it does not back within thirty days from
the date of issue. Subodh S. Salaskar v. Jayprakash M. Shah, 2008(3) RCR(Civil) 905 SC.
46 Ibid
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
In M. G. Dua v. Balli Mal Nawal Kishore, it was held that summons can be sent by registered
post only in the first instance. If any other mode of service is tried in the first instance and if
it fails to yield any fruitful result, it is not open to courts to endeavor to effect service on the
defendants by registered post.
R. 9 also states that where the defendant refuses to accept the summons, he is deemed to have
been served. Similarly, where an acknowledgement or receipt purported to have been signed
by the defendant is received by the court that the defendant has refused to take the delivery of
the summons, the court will proceed treating the defendant as served.
In the matter of Mst. Bhabia Devi v. Permanand Pd. Yadav, the ex parte decree was held to
be rightly passed where the defendant refused to put her sign or thumb impression on
summons when they were handed to her and she also refused to acknowledge the registered
service.
There are many type cases where summons cannot be served ordinarily or via any other
procedure as described above. For such type of cases S. 28-29 and Order V, Rules 21-30 of
the Code can be dealt with. To study them clearly, they have been categorized into various
categories as discussed below.
Order V, Rule 17 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service by affixing a copy
of summons on defendants house without an order of the court
(a) Where the defendant or his agent or in their absence an adult member of the family
refuses to sign the acknowledgment, or
(b) where the serving officer, after using due diligence, cannot find the defendant who is
absent from his residence at the time when service is sought to be effected on him at his
residence and within a reasonable time and there is no such other person on whom service
47 ibid
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
can be effected, the serving officer shall affix a copy of the summons on the outer door or
some other conspicuous part of the house in which the defendant ordinarily resides or carries
on business or personally works for gain, and then shall return the original to the court from
which it was issued, with a report endorsed thereon stating that he has so affixed the copy, the
circumstances under which he did so, and the name and address of the person (if any) by
whom the house was identified and in whose presence the copy was affixed. If the court is
satisfied it declares the service to have been duly effected.
Order V, Rule 19-A of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service by registered post
in addition to personal service. The court shall, in addition to, and simultaneously with the
issue of summons for service also direct the summons to be served by registered post,
acknowledgment due, addressed to the defendant, or his agent empowered to accept the
service, at the place where the defendant, or his agent, actually and voluntarily resides or
carries on business or personally works for gain. The court, however, shall not issue a
summons for service by registered post, where, in the circumstances of the case, it considers
it unnecessary.
48 Ibid
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
Order V, Rule 9 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Delivery of summons to the
plaintiff or his agent.
(1) The court shall issue summons and deliver the same to the plaintiff or his agent, for
service, and direct the summons to be served by registered post, acknowledgment, due or by
speed post or by such courier service as may be approved by the High Court or by fax
message or by Electronic Mail Service by such other means as the High Court may prescribe
by rules, addressed to the defendant to accept the service at the place where the defendant or
his agent actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain.
(2) The plaintiff or his agent shall send the summons by any means as directed by the court
under sub-rule (1) within two days from the delivery of summons to the plaintiff by the court
under that sub-rule.
(3) When an acknowledgment or any other receipt purporting to be signed by the defendant
or his agent received by the court or postal article containing the summons is received back
by the court with an endorsement purporting to have been made by a postal employee or by
any authorised person to the effect that the defendant or his agent had refused to take delivery
of the postal article containing the summons or refused to accept the summons by any other
means specified in sub-rule (1), when tendered or transmitted to him, the court issuing the
summons shall declare that the summons had been duly served on the defendant: Provided
that summons was properly addressed, pre-paid and duly send by registered post
acknowledgment due, the declaration referred to in this sub-rule shall be made
notwithstanding the fact that the acknowledgment having been lost or misled or for any other
reasons has not been received by the court on the date fixed by it.
Order V, Rule 9 of the code of Civil Procedure,1908 deals with Simultaneous issue of
summons for service by the court-controlled process.
(1) The court may, in addition to and simultaneously with the delivery of summons for
service to the plaintiff as provided in the manner provided in Rule 9, may also direct that
49 Order V, Rule 9 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908
50 Order V, Rule 9
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
summons to be served on the defendant or his agent empowered to accept the service at the
place where the defendant or his agent actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business
or personally works for gain.
(2) The summons shall, unless the court otherwise directs, be delivered or sent to the proper
officer in such manner as may be prescribed by the High Court to be served by him or one of
his subordinates.
(3) The proper officer may be an officer of the Court other than that in which the suit is
instituted, and where he is such an officer, the summons may be sent to him in such manner
as the court may direct.
(4) The proper officer may serve the summons by registered post acknowledgment due, by
speed post, by such courier service as may be approved by the High Court, by fax message,
by Electronic Mail Service or by such other means as may be provided by the rules made by
the High Court.
3.5 Service of summons where defendant resides within the jurisdiction of another
court.51
Order V, Rule 11 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service of summons where
defendant resides within the jurisdiction of another court
A summons may be sent by the court by which it is issued, whether within or without the
state either by one of its officers or by post or by such courier service as may be approved by
the High Court, by fax message or by Electronic Mail Service or by any other means as may
be provided by the rules made by the High Court, to any court (not being the High Court)
having jurisdiction in the place where the defendant resides.
Order V, Rule 22 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service within Presidency
Towns of summons issued by Courts outside. Where a summons issued by any court
51 Order V, Rule 11
52 Order V, Rule 22
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
established beyond the limits of the towns of Calcutta, Madras and Bombay is to be served
within any such limits, it shall be sent to the court of small causes within whose jurisdiction it
is to be served.
Order V, Rule 22 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service on defendant in
prison. Where the defendant is confined in a prison, the summons shall be delivered or sent
by post or by such courier service as may be approved by the High Court, by fax message or
by Electronic Mail Service or by any other means as may be provided by the rules made by
the High Court, to the officer-in-charge of the prison for service on the defendant.
3.8 Service where defendant resides out of Bangladesh and has no agent
Order V, Rule 25 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service where defendant
resides out of Bangladesh and has no agent. Where the defendant resides out of India and has
no agent in India empowered to accept service, the summons shall be addressed to the
defendant at the place where he 1s residing and sent to him by post or by such courier service
as may be approved by the High Court, by fax message or by Electronic Mail Service or by
any other means as may be provided by the rules made by the High Court:
Provided that where any such defendant resides in India or Pakistan, the summons together
with copy thereof, may be sent for service on the defendant, to any court in that country (not
being the High Court) having jurisdiction in the place where the defendant resides:
Provided further that where any such defendant is a public officer in Bangladesh or Pakistan
(not belonging to Bangladesh or, as the case may be, Pakistan Military, Naval or Air Forces)
or is a servant of a railway company or local authority in that country, the summons together
with a copy thereof, may be sent for service on the defendant to such officer or authority in
that country as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify,
in this behalf.
53 Order V, Rule 22
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
Order V, Rule 26 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service in foreign country
through Political Agent or Court.
(a) in the exercise of any foreign jurisdiction vested or a court has been established or
contained, with power to serve a summons, issued by a Court under this Code, in any foreign
country in which the defendant actually and voluntarily resides, carries on business or
personally works for gain, or
(b) the Central Government has, by notification in the Official Gazette, declared, in respect of
any court situate in any such territory and not established or continued in the exercise of any
such jurisdiction as aforesaid, that service by such court of any summons issued by a Court
under this Code shall be deemed to be valid service, the summons may be sent to such
Political Agent or court, by post or otherwise, or if so directed by the Central Government but
the purpose of being served upon the defendant, and, if the Political Agent or Court return the
summons with an endorsement purporting to have been made by such Political Agent or by
the Judge or other officer of the Court to the effect that the summons has been served on the
defendant in the manner hereinbefore directed, such endorsement shall be deemed to be
evidence of service.
Order V, Rule 27 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Summons to be sent to
officers of foreign countries. Where the Central Government has by notification in the
Official Gazette, declared in respect of any foreign territory that summons to be served on
defendants actually and voluntarily residing or carrying on business or personally working for
gain in that foreign territory may be sent to an officer of the Government of that foreign
territory specified by the Central Government, the summonses may be sent to such officer
through the ministry of the Government of India dealing with foreign affairs or in such other
manner as may be specified by the Central Government; and if such officer returns any such
54Order V, Rule 26
55 Mulla, The Code of Civil Procedure, 17th ed., LexisNexis Butterworths Publications, 2007 at p. 556
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
summons with an endorsement purporting to have been made by him that the summons has
been served on the defendant such endorsement shall be deemed to be evidence of service.
Order V, Rule 28 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with Service on Civil Public
Officer or on servant of Railway Company or local authority. Where the defendant is a public
officer, officer (not belonging to the Indian military, navel or, air force) or is the servant of a
railway company or local authority the Court may, if it appears to it that the summons may be
most conveniently so served, send it for service on the defendant to the head of the office in
which he is employed together with copy to be retained by the defendant.
Order V, Rule 29 of the code of Civil Procedure deals with Service on soldiers or sailors or
airman, where the defendant is a soldier, sailor or airman, the court shall send the summons
for service to his commanding officer together with a copy to be retained by the defendant.
Order V, Rule 30 of the code of Civil Procedure deals with Substitution of letters for
summons.
(1) The Court may, notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, substitute for a
summons a letter signed by a Judge or such officer as he may appoint in this behalf, where
the defendant is in the opinion of the Court, of a rank entitling him to such mark of
consideration.
56 Order V, Rule 28
57 Ibid
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
(2) A letter substituted under sub-rule (1) shall contain all the particulars required to be stated
to a summons, and subject to the provisions of sub-rule (3) shall be treated in all respect as a
summons.
(3) A letter so substituted may be sent to the defendant by post or by a special messenger
selected by the court, or in any other manner which the Court thinks fit, and where the
defendant has an agent empowered to accept service, the letter may be delivered or sent to
such agent.
After the plaintiff is adjudged a pauper and the suit if registered, a summons must be served
upon the defendant without which a decree passed ex parte is illegal. Punjab vs Kanwar 10
DLR (SC) 14
The Supreme Court in Sushil Kumar Sabharwal v. Gurpeet Singh held that non-service of
summons is a ground for setting aside an ex parte decree. The service of summons to the
party cannot be a mere formality but should, in fact, be reality. In Naresh Chandra Agarwal v.
Bank of Baroda the appellant application for setting aside an ex parte decree was rejected by
Trial Court and subsequently by the High Court as it considered the validity of notice of
substitution sent to the permanent residential address rather than his actual present residence.
The plaintiff admitted in his affidavit that the appellant was working in some other place at
the relevant time. In appeal the Supreme Court has set aside the decree as it considered that
summon was not served in reality. In Rabindra Singh v. Financial Commr. Coop., an ex parte
decree was passed against the defendant who was residing in foreign country for the past 25
years and has never received any notice though the plaintiff had knowledge of his correct
address. Summons were effected to the village address. The Court held that ex parte decree
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
When seeking remedy against an ex parte decree the Court before exercising its discretion
should satisfied that summons were not proved to be served duly.
If the applicant refuses to accept the notice and pleads for setting aside the ex parte decree on
the ground of absence of notice cannot be entertained. However, if the defendant did not
accept summons bona fide on the grounds of misdescription, even though the service is held
to be good, the ex parte decree passed as a result can be set aside.
Mere non-service of summons is not a ground in itself to set aside an ex parte decree on the
grounds of fraud but fraudulent suppression of summons is. In A.C. Ananthaswamy v. Boriah
there was a bare allegation of fraud. Moreover, no allegation of fraud was made in the two
proceedings prior to this appeal. The question before the Court was whether non service of
summons amount to fraud. The court said a suit for setting aside an ex parte decree on mere
non-service of summons is not maintainable.
If the Court rejects the defendant application for setting aside the decree under Order IX Rule
13 on the grounds of fraud in case of non-service of summons upon him subsequent regular
suit for setting aside on the same fraud is barred due to application of res judicata.
A warrant is an official authorization which gives the power for law enforcement officials to
engage in an activity.
A summons, on the other hand, is also an official request made by a court for an individual
to be present on a specific date and time to inquire after charges that have been made.
58 lawhelpbd.com/article/summons-vs-warrant/
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
The main difference between summons and warrant is that while a warrant gives authority
for law enforcement officials to perform an action, a summons requests of the individual to
be present for an inquiry.
If an individual ignores the summons then the next step would be the issue of a warrant.
In Bangladesh Summons is an important subject matter for any civil suit under the Code of
Civil Procedure,1908.59 When the plaintiff files a suit, the defendant has to be informed that
the suit, the defendant has to be informed that the suit has been filed against him, and that he
is required to appear in the court to defend it. The intimation which is sent to the defendant by
the court is technically known as Summons. Although the term Summons has not been
defined in the code, a summons is a document issued from the office of a court of Justice,
calling upon the person to whom it is directed to attend before a Judge or officer of the Court
for a certain purpose. With the provision in Rule 1 of Order V where it is stated that no
summons shall be issued when the defendant has appeared at the presentation of the plaint
and admitted the plaintiffs claim. In all other cases summons must be issued and served to
defendants.
Australia
In the Australian state of New South Wales (NSW) the service of a Court Attendance Notice
can be issued in a number of ways, the most common of which is by the NSW Police Force
when charging someone after an arrest is made, a Bail Court Attendance Notice (with bail
conditions) or regular Court Attendance Notice is issued. Other methods the Police use
include via a paper form called a Field Court Attendance Notice (Field CAN) which is issued
to the accused person on the spot after an offence has been detected. Or by way of a Future
Court Attendance Notice (Future CAN), which replaced the old court issued summons and is
served in person by Police or sometimes by mail. In all of these cases the CAN is filed at the
court after it has been served.60
United Kingdom
Historically, in old English law, a summons was called an auxilium curiae, although this term
is now obsolete.61 In England and Wales, the term writ of summons for the originating
document in civil proceedings has been replaced with the term claim form by the Civil
Procedure Rules,1999 (CPR). This is part of the reforms to simplify legal terminology.
However, despite its name, the claim form does not present the details of the claim itself (in
other words, it does not replace the complaint). The complaint is now known as the
particulars of claim.62
United States
In most U.S. jurisdictions, the service of a summons is in most cases required for the court to
have jurisdiction over the party who is being summoned.63 The process by which a summons
is served is called service of process. The form and content of service in the federal courts is
governed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the rules of many state
courts are similar. The federal summons is usually issued by the clerk of the court. In many
states the summons may be issued by an attorney, but some states use filing as the means to
commence an action and in those states the attorney must first file the summons in duplicate
before it becomes effective; one or more copies are stamped by the court clerk with the court
seal and returned to the attorney, who then uses it to actually serve the defendants. Other
61 Black's Law Dictionary
jurisdictions may only require that the summons be filed after it is served on the defendants. 64
New York is distinguished by its permissive filing system, in which the summons or
complaint need not be filed at all.
Rule 15 of Order V says that in the absence of the defendant, service may be made on any
adult male member of the family. Under this rule even the wife of the defendant cannot
legally receive summons. However, the wife of the defendant or any adult female member is
likely to be available at home when summons has to be served during working hours. The
ineligibility of the female to receive summons delays the process of its service as the process
server has to return the summons no served, if the defendant or any adult male member of his
family is not available. This rule is also discriminatory against women, and there is no
reasonable ground for its existence to-day.Service by post includes only government
institutions responsible for postal service. However, the courier service may be considered for
inclusion as this kind of service has become popular and trustworthy. The District Judge of
each district can be empowered by the law to make a list of agents of such courier service
available in his particular district. The courier service can be approved as an alternative to
government postal service. The other alternative service may also be fax message or
electronic mail (e-mail). This is very useful where the defendant is an employee/employer in
a public or private organization or business enterprise or resides in places outside the
jurisdiction of the court. The soft copies of plaint or petition can also be served along with the
process in this way. Courier service and service through fax and e-mail has already been
recognized in Bangladesh by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The advantage of fax, e-mail
and courier service is that these services will be made at the expense of the plaintiff and he
will be responsible to make the service on his own initiative. Thus it will ease the workload
of the process-servers as well as the courts, and will at the same time expedite the service.
Another aspect is that it will reduce the scopes for malpractices in the service of summons.
4.8 Recommendation
Rule 15 of Order V can be amended by deleting the word male, thereby including any adult
member of the family who is permanently residing with the defendant to be eligible to
receive summons. The words member of the family needs clarification. There is already an
Explanation under the same provision which excludes the servant as member of the family.
The existing note of explanation can be further clarified by inserting a specific definition of
the member of a family, which will include any person residing permanently with the A new
rule can be inserted right after Rule 19B of Order V introducing the above alternative
methods, or alternatively some changes can be made in Rule 19B of Order V or Rule 9 of
Order V. There should be clear provisions as to what kind of proof needs to be submitted to
satisfy the court that the process has been duly served by the plaintiff; as to who will bear the
expenses; and how long the court needs to wait to declare that the process has been served.
The main emphasis must be on the satisfaction of the court that the summons has been served
in one or any of the different modes, which would enable the court to take the next steps. It
has to be made clear that these services will be alternative to the postal service. A minor
change should also be made in Rule 1 of Order IV, indicating that in case of alternative
service a petition on behalf of the plaintiff stating that he wants to serve the summons through
courier service or fax message or e-mail within the date mentioned by the court is sufficient.
defendant except servants. Under the present procedural system, service of summons or
process is not properly effected due to procedural technicalities. Under the system, the
process-server is the most powerful person in serving the summons and there is no check and
watchdog over the work of process-server. Moreover, the postal system of our country is not
effective enough in providing its service in time. So there is glaring need to change the
present system and to incorporate a new dimension of service of summons or process. Any
or more of the following steps may be taken into consideration:
ii. A separate sell for service should be set up i.e. a separate department of service may be
established in the nezarat branch which is to deal with all functions in respect of service of
summons or process.
iii. Similarly a separate branch or sell for service should be set up in every Union
Parishad wherefrom summons or process may be effectively served to the defendant or
witness residing in the Union.
iv. Courier service and internet or cyber network access should be adopted in every
stage of the service of summons or process.
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL SUIT IN BANGLADESH
v. Process fees should be increased to a reasonable amount in consonance with present day
communication expenditure.
vi. Postal department should be instructed to give special treatment in delivering courts
summons, letters, etc
5. Conclusion
Summons is a service, where informed to the defendant about the suit which was filed by the
plaintiff. It is the judicial process to inform the defendant to submit his appearance on behalf
of him and he get the chance to say something about the suit. Whether he is liable or not.
Section 27 and order V provides the provision of summons. Here provides the provision of
service of summons. Even how a summons will serve in case of the absence of the defendant.
If the defendant is public servant of Bangladesh then which procedure will be followed that is
also specified in that Code.
Book reference:
1.Takwani C. K., Civil Procedure, 7th ed., Eastern Book Company, 2014
3. Mahbudul Islam: Law of Civil Procedure, ed.2nd , Volume 2 (or 21r. 60 to end)
5. A. M Moniruzzaman, Civil Procedure Code, 3rd ed., (Dhaka: Shams Publications, 2007
8. Md. Abul Kalam Azad, The Code of Civil Procedure, 3rd ed., (Dhaka: Lipi Law Book House,
2008)