NAT OPS Checklist PDF
NAT OPS Checklist PDF
This NAT OPS Bulletin supersedes NAT OPS Bulletin, Serial Number: 2011-019.
These checklists are promulgated by the NAT Safety Oversight Group (NAT SOG).
NOTICE
NAT Ops Bulletins are used to distribute information on behalf of the North Atlantic Systems Planning
Group (NAT SPG). The material contained therein may be developed within the working structure of the
NAT SPG or be third party documents posted at the request of a NAT SPG Member State. A printed or
electronic copy of this Bulletin, plus any associated documentation, is provided to the recipient as is and
without any warranties as to its description, condition, quality, fitness for purpose or functionality and for use
by the recipient solely for guidance only. The information published by ICAO in this document is made
available without warranty of any kind; the Organization accepts no responsibility or liability whether direct
or indirect, as to the currency, accuracy or quality of the information, nor for any consequence of its use.
The designations and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any
opinion whatsoever on the part of ICAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of
its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist available on www.paris.icao.int (EUR & NAT Documents,
NAT Documents), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.
There is no objection to the reproduction of extracts of information contained in this Bulletin if the source is
acknowledged.
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
Page 2 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
FLIGHT PLANNING
Plotting Chart
A plotting chart of appropriate scale should be used for all remote oceanic operations. This includes using a
plotting chart for published oceanic routes and tracks. ICAO groups who review oceanic errors have
determined that the routine use of a plotting chart is an excellent aid to reduce lateral errors. A plotting chart
can also serve as a critical aid in case of partial or total navigation failure. It should be noted that the pilot
should read from the plotting chart back to the master CFP when verifying data. To read from the Master
CFP to the plotting chart is a human factors issue that has lead to errors based on seeing what we expect to
see.
Equal Time Point (ETP)
ETPs should be computed for contingencies such as medical divert, engine loss or rapid depressurization. A
simultaneous engine loss and rapid depressurization should also be considered. It is advisable to note the
ETPs on the plotting chart. Crewmembers should review with each other the appropriate diversion airport(s)
when crossing ETPs. Pilot procedures should also include a manual method for computing ETPs. Crews
should not enter ETPs in the Long Range Navigation System (LRNS) as this has led to Gross Navigation
Errors.
Track message
Crews must have a current track message even if filed for a random route or filed above North Atlantic
MNPSA. Reviewing the date, effective Zulu time and Track Message Identifier (TMI) ensures having a
current track message on board. The TMI is linked to the Julian Date. Operators must also ensure that their
flight planning and operational control process notify crewmembers in a timely manner of any amendments
to the daily track message. Plotting tracks near the assigned route can help situational awareness in case the
crew needs to execute a contingency procedure.
Review possible navigation aids for accuracy check prior to coast out
It is good practice to discuss in advance a primary and secondary ground based navigational aid that will be
used to verify the accuracy of the LRNS. This planning may help to identify intended navigation aids that are
limited or NOTAMed unusable and is helpful when departing airports close to oceanic airspace. Examples
include Shannon (EINN), Lisbon (LRRT), Los Angeles (KLAX), etc.
PREFLIGHT
Master Clock
It is a requirement to have a master clock on board synchronized to UTC or GPS. This time source, which is
typically the Flight Management System (FMS), must be used for all ETAs and ATAs. The use of multiple
time sources on the aircraft has lead to inconsistencies in reporting times to ATC and resulted in a loss of
longitudinal separation.
Page 3 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
Maintenance Log
Before entering a special area of operation, crews should focus on any write-ups that affect communication,
navigation, surveillance or RVSM requirements. Any discrepancies noted in the maintenance log or during
the walk-around may require delays or rerouting.
RVSM
Required equipment includes two primary independent altimetry sources, one altitude alert system and one
automatic altitude control system. In most cases a functioning transponder that can be linked to the primary
altimetry source is also required. Crews should note any issues that can affect accurate altimetry.
Altimeter checks
Before taxi, crews should set their altimeters to the airport QNH. Both primary altimeters must agree within
75 feet of field elevation. The two primary altimeters must also agree within the limits noted in the aircraft
operating manual.
Wind Shear or Turbulence Forecast
The Master Computer Flight Plan (CFP) with projected wind shear or the turbulence forecast documents
should be reviewed for flights in RVSM airspace. Forecast moderate or greater turbulence could lead to
RVSM suspension. Operators are cautioned against flight planning through areas of forecast moderate or
greater turbulence.
Computer Flight Plan (CFP)
The document designated as the Master CFP should be carefully checked for date, type aircraft, fuel load and
performance requirements. Crosschecks should also be done for routing and forecast groundspeeds. The CFP
should be carefully checked against the ICAO filed flight plan to ensure the routing is in agreement with
both documents. The enroute time on the CFP should be compared against the distance to destination for a
reasonable groundspeed. The enroute time should also be compared against the total distance for a
reasonable fuel load.
Dual Long Range NAV System (LRNS)
Two operational LRNSs are required for remote oceanic operations. A single FMS receiving inputs from two
navigation sensors is not considered to be two LRNSs.
HF check
An HF check should be conducted on the primary and secondary HF radios in areas where dual HF radios
are required. If possible, the HF checks should be done on the ground or before entering oceanic airspace. A
SELCAL check should also be accomplished at each Oceanic Control Area (OCA) boundary even if datalink
equipped.
Confirm Present Position coordinates
Both pilots should independently verify the present position coordinates using either published ramp
coordinates or determine position from the airfield diagram. They should not rely solely on the present
position when the LRNS was shut down from the previous flight. A master source such as an enroute chart
should also be used to confirm accuracy of coordinates at the oceanic boundaries.
Master CFP symbols
Operators are encouraged to use consistent symbology on the Master CFP. For example, a circled number
() means the second crewmember has independently verified the coordinates entered or crosschecked by
the first crewmember. A checkmark () may indicate that the track and distances have been confirmed. A
diagonal line ( \ ) may indicate that the crew has confirmed the coordinates of the approaching and next way
point. An X-symbol (X) may indicate having flown overhead the way point.
Page 4 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
LRNS programming
Check currency and software version
It is important to check the effective date of the database. Crews should note if the database is
projected to expire during their trip. Crews are discouraged from flying with expired databases.
MELs may allow relief to fly with an expired database but require the crews to manually crosscheck
all data. The software version of the database should also be confirmed in case there has been a
change.
Independent verification
It is critical that one crewmember enters waypoint coordinates and that these are independently
checked by another crewmember. It should be noted that the pilot should read from the FMS screen
back to the master CFP when verifying data. To read from the Master CFP to the FMS is a human
factors issue that has lead to errors based on seeing what we expect to see.
Check expanded coordinates of waypoints
Most FMSs allow entering abbreviated oceanic coordinates. There have been cases when there was
an error in the expanded waypoint coordinate, but crews only checked the abbreviated coordinate.
Verifying only the abbreviated coordinate could lead to a lateral error. Flight crews should conduct a
magnetic course and distance check between waypoints to further verify waypoint coordinates.
Track and distance check
To minimize oceanic errors, it is important to conduct a magnetic course and distance check from
oceanic entry to oceanic exit. Operators should establish a tolerance such as 2 and 2NM. The
course and distance check comparing the Master CFP against the LRNS are critical in detecting
errors that may not have been noticed by simply checking coordinates. A difference of more than 2
between waypoints may be due to a difference of the magnetic variation in the database versus the
variation used in the Master CFP. Any difference outside the 2 or 2NM should be rechecked
and verified.
Upload winds
Some LRNS units allow the crew to upload projected winds. This procedure allows more accurate
reporting of ETAs.
Groundspeed check
The groundspeed should be noted before taxiing the aircraft. Crews should expect the groundspeed to read
zero (0) knots. This procedure is a good practice to detect an error that may be developing in the LRNS.
Page 5 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
CLIMB OUT
Transition altitude
Crews should brief the transition altitude based on information from the approach plate or from the ATIS.
After climbing through the transition altitude, the altimeters should be reset to 29.92 inches or 1013.2 hPa.
Manually compute ETAs
After climbing above the sterile altitude and time permitting crews should manually compute ETAs from
departure to destination. These should be noted on the Master CFP. This is an excellent crosscheck against
ETAs computed by the LRNS.
Page 6 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
APPROACHING WAYPOINTS
Confirm next latitude/longitude
Within a few minutes of crossing an oceanic waypoint crews should crosscheck the coordinates of that
waypoint and the next waypoint. This check should be done by comparing the coordinates against the
Master CFP based on the currently effective ATC clearance.
OVERHEAD WAYPOINTS
Confirm aircraft transitions to next waypoint
When overhead an oceanic waypoint, crews should ensure that the aircraft transitions to the next leg. This is
confirmed by noting the magnetic heading and distance to the next waypoint compared against the Master
CFP.
Page 7 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
10-MINUTE PLOT
Record time and latitude/longitude on plotting chart
Approximately 10 minutes after passing an oceanic waypoint, crews should plot the latitude, longitude and
time on the plotting chart. It is advisable to plot the non-steering LRNS. A 10-minute plot can alert the crew
to any lateral deviation from their ATC clearance prior to it becoming a Gross Navigation Error. A good
crosscheck for the position of the 10-minute plot is that it is approximately 2 of longitude past the oceanic
waypoint.
MIDPOINT
Midway between waypoints
It is good practice to crosscheck winds midway between oceanic waypoints by comparing the Master CFP,
LRNS and upper millibar wind chart. This crosscheck will also aid crews in case there is a need for a
contingency procedure such as Dead Reckoning (DR).
Confirm time
It is recommended that during a wind check the crews also confirm the ETA to the next waypoint. A change
of three (3) minutes or more requires that ATC be notified in a timely manner.
COAST IN
Compare ground based NAVAID to LRNS
When departing oceanic airspace and acquiring ground based NAVAIDs, crews should note the accuracy of
the LRNS by comparing it to those NAVAIDs. Any discrepancy should be noted in the Maintenance Log.
Remove Strategic Lateral Offset
Crews using a Lateral Offset of 1 NM or 2 NM right of centerline at oceanic entry need a procedure to
remove this Lateral Offset at coast in prior to exiting oceanic airspace. It is advisable to include this as a
checklist item.
Confirm routing after oceanic exit
Before entering the domestic route structure, crews must confirm their routing to include aircraft speed.
NOTE: Crews experiencing loss of communications leaving oceanic airspace should follow State guidance
as published in AIPs.
Page 8 of 9
NAT OPS BULLETIN 2012-024 Sample Oceanic Checklists
DESCENT
Transition level
During the approach briefing, crews should note the transition level on the approach plate or verified by
ATIS. Crews must be diligent when descending through the transition level to reset the altimeters to QNH.
This is particularly important when encountering IFR, night or high terrain situations. Any confusion
between a QNH set with inches of Mercury or hPa must be clarified.
DESTINATION/BLOCK IN
Navigation Accuracy Check
When arriving at the destination gate, crews should note any drift or circular error in the LRNS. A GPS
Primary Means system normally should not exceed 0.27 NM for the flight. Some inertial systems may drift
as much as 2 NM per hour. Because the present generation of LRNSs is highly accurate, operators should
establish a drift tolerance which if exceeded would require a write-up in the Maintenance Log. RNP
requirements demand that drift be closely monitored.
RVSM write-ups
Problems noted in the altimetry system, altitude alert or altitude hold must be noted in the Maintenance Log.
The RVSM airspace is closely monitored for any Height Deviations. An aircraft not meeting the strict
RVSM standards must not be flight-planned into RVSM airspace without corrective action.
- END -
- END -
Page 9 of 9