Arizona State University P.O. Box 876004 Tempe, AZ 85287-6004

Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1649.
pdf
Space Science Opportunities Augmented by Exploration Telepresence (ET) - Keck Institute for
Space Studies R.C. Anderson1, K. Hodges2, and J. Burdick3, 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, 2 Arizona State University, P.O. Box 876004,
Tempe, AZ 85287-6004, 3California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109,
Robert.C.Anderson@jpl.nasa.gov.
Workshop: The Keck Institute of Space Studies

organized a Study Program on "Space Science
Opportunities Augmented by Exploration
Telepresence". The first workshop in this study
was held at California Institute of Technology on
October 3-7, 2016 with 28 participants from
NASA, space agencies, and industry, providing
expertise in planetary science, telerobotics, and
human space flight. While the study report will
be developed after the second workshop, now
scheduled for May 1-3, 2017, below is a brief Fig. 1 Artist rendecion of Exploration Telepresence
summary on that first workshop. (ET). Figure courdacency of Goddradd Space Flight Center.
http://www.kiss.caltech.edu/new_website/worksh
might augment and what obstacles must be
ops/telepresence/telepresence.html#
overcome for the vision of ET science (e.g.,
geology and astrobiology) to become a reality.
Overview: The aim of this workshop was to
The aim was to evaluate the extent to which ET
provide the community with a critical review of a
might help achieve these goals. Overall, we were
potentially new space exploration strategic
interested in understanding how rapid progress in
approach: field scientific research on planetary
telerobotic technology might change the face of
surfaces conducted by astronaut/scientists using
space exploration on the timescale foreseen for
robotic surrogates when the distance from the
sending humans to Mars.
scientists to the robots is so short as to provide
the illusion of being part of the surface
Introcuction to the First Workshop: Since the
environment without requiring humans to be
end of the Apollo missions, mankind has
physically at the site. This new paradigm
conducted scientific studies on planetary surfaces
represents a synergistic partnership between
other than Earth exclusively using teleoperated
humans and robots and will pave the way for
robots. These operations require strategies to
eventually putting humans physically on
mitigate the effects of two issues related to long
planetary surfaces. We refer to this new approach
distances from Earth to the research targets: 1)
as "exploration telepresence" (ET-Figure 1).
long communication delays (high latency); and 2)
the limited rate of two-way information flow (low
Current planning at NASA and recent
bandwidth). Despite the proven successes of
independent studies have noted the potential
science done using assets such as Curiosity, it is
benefits of ET. However, these reports were
as yet unclear what penalties might be associated
primarily developed from individual scientists,
with the use of current teleoperation modes for
engineers, and teleroboticists. To formally
planetary field research as compared to
address the benefits and/or drawbacks of ET, a
alternative strategies that involve placing
multidisciplinary review was essential. For this
scientists more proximal to research targets so as
workshop, world-class representatives of
to drastically reduce latencies and minimize the
telerobotics, planetary science, and human space
effects of bandwidth limitations. To what extent
flight gathered to evaluate the pros and cons of
may low latencies improve the efficiency and
ET, with a goal to identify research tasks that ET
effectiveness of telerobotic science? What
Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1649.pdf
planetary processes that are high-value research surface assets from orbit would likely be much
targets cannot be effectively studied using less expensive than putting humans on the
telerobotics at high latencies? Is there special surface, and would increase crew safety.
value to placing scientists in a position to
teleoperate robots with communication latencies SBT may be particularly advantageous for three
less than a few hundred milliseconds, such that kinds of planetary field science. First, it may be
the scientists could effectively conduct real- the only way to do the highest-quality field
time research as if they were there on a science in environments, which are so extreme
planetary surface? that presently available technology will not offer
suitable protection for on-site astronauts. Second,
Early in the workshop, a consensus emerged that, it may be necessary to do research on transient
despite the fact that planetary field science has events (e.g., cryovolcanic eruptions, or
employed an increasingly sophisticated array of atmospheric phenomena such as dust devils), the
robotic technologies over the past four decades; timescales of which preclude effective study by
the planetary science community still largely high-latency telerobotics. Finally, SBT may
regards the research accomplishments of permit more effective teleoperation of multiple,
scientists on site as the standard against which the geographically distributed robotic assets on a
success of robotic field science must be planetary surface, enabling rapid, large-scale
measured. As a consequence, there are reasons to reconnaissance which could guide more detailed
believe that new strategies may accelerate the future research.
pace of robotic field science and yield even
greater scientific returns approaching those Despite the promise of new robotic strategies for
possible with scientists on site. These include the planetary exploration science, the participants felt
use of fully autonomous robotic agents, variably that many questions needed to be answered
supervised robotic agents, and robotic agents before these modes of research can reach their
teleoperated by scientists sufficiently proximal to full potential. Many roboticists at the workshop
the study site so as to achieve telepresence. Of felt confident that there will be dramatic advances
these, given the current state of autonomous in artificial intelligence, autonomy, and haptics
robotics, science by telepresence (SBT) offers between now and the anticipated timeframe
many attractive, near-term opportunities to human travel to regions in the vicinity of high-
improve robotic planetary field science. value exploration targets like Mars. The
harnessing of these advances to produce the next
SBT more readily enables opportunistic science, generation of robotic assets (or partners) for
encouraging the kind of real-time adaptive planetary field science will require concerted
approaches that characterize the highest-quality efforts in robotics research with sufficient support
field research on Earth. SBT also would lead to a from NASA and other funding sources. Similarly,
dramatic improvement in the efficiency with all participants recognized that we really have
which a set of research tasks could be completed. very little experience in doing planetary field
This efficiency, in turn, likely increases the science with low-latency telerobotics, even with a
realistic geographic scope of research activities large degree of supervised autonomy. As a
on other planetary surfaces. consequence, there is an urgent need to create an
effective funding stream for research on best
Participants noted additional factors that might practices of science operations under low-latency
favor SBT instead of on-site field research by conditions. In addition, well-designed
landed astronaut scientists. For example, one of experiments are needed to compare and contrast
the most interesting scientific enterprises on Mars the efficiency and effectiveness of high- and low-
the search for signs of biological activity will latency research modalities as we contemplate the
be conducted in regions where there is strong role of strategies such as SBT into mission
incentive to keep human bodies out until those planning. A second workshop is scheduled for
searches are complete. In addition, participants Spring 2017 to conceptualize specific research
agreed that low-latency telerobotic control of projects to address existing knowledge gaps.

Arizona State University P.O. Box 876004 Tempe, AZ 85287-6004

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Arizona State University P.O. Box 876004 Tempe, AZ 85287-6004

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Arizona State University P.O. Box 876004 Tempe, AZ 85287-6004

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1649.

Workshop: The Keck Institute of Space Studies

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.