5.reaction Calorimetry PDF

THEMATIC NETWORK ON
HarsNet HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF HIGHLY REACTIVE SYSTEMS
5. Reaction Calorimetry
This HarsBook text has been prepared by a HarsNet working

group. The text has been prepared in good faith but the authors
accept no responsibility for the consequences of application of the
information contained herein. The HarsNet Thematic network is
European Community Project BET2-0572 funded in part by
contract number BRRT-CT98-5066.
Keywords: bench scale reaction calorimeter, calorimetry, heat flow, heat balance,
power compensation, temperature oscillation, heat transfer coefficients,
isothermal, isoperibolic, adiabatic.
5.1. Introduction
Basic thermodynamic and kinetic data of chemical reactions, and some physicochemical
properties of reaction mixtures, can be determined experimentally using so called bench
scale reaction calorimeters. These have typical reaction volumes from 10 to 100 ml up
to several litres. They usually consist of a stirred reaction vessel and offer the possibility
of carrying out chemical reactions in batch, semi-batch or usually with modifications
of the device-, in the continuous mode. A condenser can be added to study the reaction
under reflux and special reactors are available in order to carry out reactions under high
pressure. Areas of application of reaction calorimetry include:
- determination of calorimetric data for reactor and process design (e.g., overall heat
release or supply during physical changes or chemical reactions, heat transfer
coefficients, specific heat capacity, adiabatic temperature rise, reactant
accumulation.)
- study of the kinetic behaviour of chemical reactions and or of physical changes.
- on-line monitoring of heat release rate and other analytical parameters for
subsequent process development for batch-, semi-batch and continuous reactions.
(E.g., study of the influence of mixing, errors in the charges or recipe, feed rate
errors, improper feed sequences and the effect of impurities, temperature or
concentration of reactants).
- development and optimisation of chemical processes with the objective, for
instance, of an increase of yield, selectivity or profitability.
5-1
INDUSTRIAL AND MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. PROJECT: BET2-0572
COORDINATION: Prof. Dr. R. Nomen Tel. +34-93-267 20 00 Fax. +34-93-205 62 66 http://www.iqs.url.es/harsnet
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
5.2. Fundamentals
The basis of reaction calorimetry is to perform a heat balance on the reaction vessel. The
heat rate (power) released by, or supplied to, the chemical reactions, or physical
changes, can be determined as a difference between terms for the heat production, heat
accumulation and heat exchanged with the surroundings in a macroscopic heat balance
[Hemminger te al. (1984), Barton et al. (1997), Mathot (1994), Moritz (1995)].
5.3 Isothermal, isoperibolic and adiabatic modes.
Reaction calorimeters can operate in modes so that they closely approximate to

isothermal, isoperibolic or adiabatic systems. Usually, the more sophisticated devices
can be used in all of these modes. The most simple devices usually operate
isoperibolically.
Isothermal calorimeters need an active temperature control system: this can be

achieved e.g. by using a reactor with a jacket and changing the temperature of the jacket
fluid. Another method, called power compensation consists on keeping the jacket
fluid isothermally some 10 to 20oC below the temperature of the reactor. The power
supplied to an electrical heating element (preferably with a large surface area)
submerged within the reactor is then continuously manipulated so as to maintain the
reactor at the desired temperature. As an exothermic reaction develops the power
supplied by the heater is backed off by an amount exactly equal to the power generated
by the reaction or physical change under study.
In the isoperibolic mode the surroundings of the reaction mass (usually a jacket) are
maintained at a constant temperature. Exothermic or endothermic changes will produce
a temperature increase or decrease in the reactor. If the heat exchange between the
reactor and the jacket is very fast then the temperature gradient between them will not
exceed a few degrees Celsius.
For the more sophisticated devices, a quasi-adiabatic mode is achieved by actively

adjusting the temperature of the reactor jacket such that heat losses are small. During an
exothermic change, the temperature of the reactor and the jacket will both rise with little
heat exchange between the two of them and in such a manner that heat exchange with
the surroundings stays essentially constant.
Detailed information can be found in survey articles that present different designs of
calorimeters and their applications to the investigation of chemical reactions [Nilsson et
al. (1983), Lathi et al. (1995), Grnlund et al. (1991)].
5.3.1. Heat balance equations
According to the previous definitions, even a simple reaction flask in an oil bath with a
stirrer and a thermometer could be a reaction calorimeter. This would be true if the user
is able to perform a heat balance and calculate or measure the resulting power (energy
5-2
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
per unit time) being released from (or supplied to) the chemical reactions or physical
changes in the mixture being studied.
5.3.2. Devices using a jacketed vessel and control of the jacket temperature
Mainly two types of calorimetry calculations can be described.
a) Heat balance calorimetry
The first approach is very similar to what happens in an industrial reactor: the control of
the reactor temperature is achieved by changing the inlet temperature of the circulating
fluid in the jacket. For example, if an exothermic change occurs in the reactor then the
temperature will initially start to rise. This is detected and then a temperature control loop
is used to manipulate the temperature of the fluid entering the reactor jacket such that
(essentially) isothermal conditions are restored in the reactor as quickly as possible. If the
reactor is operated in this essentially isothermally manner and if the mass flow, specific
heat capacity, inlet and outlet temperatures of the jacket fluid are known, then the heat
release rate due to chemical reactions, or physical changes, in the reactor can be
calculated as follows:
q& r = m c c pc (Tcout - Tcin ) + q& loss [Eq. 5.1]
where:
q& r: heat release rate
mc: mass flow of the jacket fluid
cpc: specific heat capacity of the jacket fluid
Tcin: inlet temperature of the jacket fluid
Tcout: outlet temperature of the jacket fluid
q& loss: heat losses
If the reaction calorimeter is not operated isothermally, a heat accumulation term must be
added to the balance (Eq. 5.2):
dT
q& r = m c c pc (Tcout - Tcin ) + m r c pr r + q& loss [Eq. 5.2]
dt
where:
q& r: heat release rate
mc: mass flow of the jacket fluid
cpc: specific heat capacity of the jacket fluid
Tcin: inlet temperature of the jacket fluid
Tr: temperature of the reaction mass
Tcout: outlet temperature of the jacket fluid
mr: reaction mass
5-3
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
cpr: specific heat capacity of the reaction mass

dTr
: rate of temperature change
dt
Note that mr, the reaction mass, will also have to account for the reactor parts submerged
in the reactants, e.g. baffles, probes, calibration heater, stirring system, etc.
In order to perform the balance, the rate of change of the temperature should be
determined continuously and the heat capacity of the reaction mass must be known, or be
determined by calibration. For example, electrical power can be added to the reactor in
the absence of other thermal effects due to reactions or physical changes. Eq. 5.2 is then
modified to the form in Eq. 5.3,
dT
q& c = m c c pc (Tcout - Tcin ) + m r c pr r [Eq. 5.3]
dt
where q& c is the calibration power. According to the previous assumptions, the only
unknown term is the specific heat capacity of the reaction mass that can thus be
determined. If all the values in the equations Eq 5.1, Eq. 5.2 and Eq. 5.3 are known or
measured (e.g. online), even a large-scale industrial reactor can be considered as a
reaction calorimeter. In fact, modern computer controlled reactors can use the on-line
calculated heat release rate as a variable in a cascade or feed forward temperature control
loop. On the lab scale, reaction calorimeters operating according to this principle are
useful for studying reaction masses with poor film heat transfer rates that are subject to
variation during reaction, such as for example polymerisations (reaction calorimeter RC1
modified by Moritz et al., isothermal heat balance reaction calorimeter (Zeton))
[(Mackenberg et al. (1998), Schulz (1996), Baranek et al. (1999), Pauer et al. (1999),
Tschonkou (1996)]. Furthermore the overall heat transfer coefficient can be determined
as a function of time and/or conversion: this gives important information for thermal
reactor design and reactor safety. If the other parameters are known and the heat release
rate qr can be measured according to Eq. 5.1, a determination of the term UA is possible
during a reaction or physical change using Eq. 5.4.
b) Heat flow (or heat flux) calorimetry
In a second type of calorimetry calculation, the temperature of the jacket is kept

essentially constant at any time by ensuring a high mass flow rate of the fluid in the
jacket. According to Eq. 5.1 if the term mccpc increases significantly, the temperature
difference between the inlet and outlet of the jacket fluid will decrease even for high heat
release rates in the reactor. For example, with a calibration power input of 25 W in a 2-
litre metal reactor of a well known bench scale reaction calorimeter, a typical temperature
difference between the reactor and jacket might be Tr-Tj = 2,5 K, whereas the difference
in temperature of the cooling fluid at jacket outlet and inlet would be ~0.025 K. As a
direct consequence the heat flow rate signal is about 100-fold times that of the heat
balance signal and is easier to measure accurately. The heat balance equation is now
written:
5-4
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
dT
q& r = U A (Tr - T j ) + m r c pr r + q& loss [Eq. 5.4]
dt
where:
U: overall heat transfer coefficient
A: heat transfer area
Tr: temperature of the reaction mass
Tj: jacket temperature
In principle, implementation of this method requires the knowledge of the overall heat
transfer coefficient and the heat transfer area throughout the whole course of the reaction.
In practice, a constant value determined from one calibration, or a linearly interpolated
relationship for the heat transfer coefficient determined from two calibrations before and
after the reaction, is used.
Most calibration devices in reaction calorimeters are simply an electrical resistance heater
submerged in the reaction mixture. It can be used to determine unknown variables,
usually in the absence of chemical reactions or physical changes. If the reactor
temperature remains constant then the overall heat transfer coefficient multiplied by the
heat transfer area (factor UA) can be determined according to Eq. 5.5. This can be
applied to both the steady state before calibration and the steady state during calibration.
By subtracting these 2 equations there is no need to determine the heat loss term (which
is assumed to remain constant.)
q& c = U A (Tr - Tj ) + q& loss [Eq. 5.5]

where:
q& c: heat power introduced by the electrical heater
Significant changes in overall heat transfer coefficient as well as a change in effective

heat exchange area during batch and semi-batch reactions can be due to changing
viscosity or density, reactor wall fouling or increasing reactor fill level (and consequently
changing stirring vortex.) These changes are often strongly non-linear with either reaction
time or reactant conversion. It is not easy to correct for these effects using either stirrer
torque measurements or geometrical filling height calculations. Such corrections are
normally sufficient for thermal measurements related to safety studies of chemical
processes. However, these types of calorimeter are not optimally suited to perform
precise measurements if big changes in the overall heat transfer coefficient (due e.g., to
changes in the viscosity) are observed during the reaction.
c) Temperature oscillation calorimetry
The principle of Temperature Oscillation Calorimetry was developed in the Technical

University of Berlin by the group of Prof. Reichert. It allows the on-line evaluation of
the change in the heat transfer coefficient and the study of mixing in high viscosity
systems. The principle of temperature oscillation calorimetry is based on an oscillatory
response that is evaluated during a reaction or physical change in the calorimeter
[Carloff et al. (1994), Tietze et al. (1995)]. A sinusoidal variation of small amplitude (1-
2C) is imposed on the reactor set point temperature. The oscillation is transferred to the
5-5
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
reactor and jacket temperature in a way that depends on the heat transfer rate. The phase
shift between the temperature variations of the jacket and the reactor makes it possible
to infer the value of the heat transfer coefficient during the reaction. The frequency
response analysis involved requires linearisation of the reaction kinetics at the mean
value of the temperature range used. This new method allows quasi-isothermal heat
flow calorimetric studies under conditions of continuously variable heat transfer
coefficient and requires only the use of a mathematical procedure for evaluation of the
measured data and a slightly modified process operation (TOC calorimeter Bocal
[Ferrara et al. (1998)], modified reaction calorimeter RC1).
d) Adiabatic calorimetry
Some commercially available devices can also operate in a pseudo adiabatic mode. In
this case the jacket temperature is set at any time close to the value of the reactor
temperature. The applications of adiabatic calorimetry for investigation of chemical
reactions and the definition of the chemical and safety data like the adiabatic
temperature rise and the value for the "Time to maximum rate" (TMR) are described in
the literature [Singh (1992), Townsend (1980), Steinbach (1998), Mosebach et al.
(1997)]. Extreme caution is advised when carrying out pseudo adiabatic experiments on
the scale of one or two litres. Violent runaway reactions can, and have, occurred. The
possibility of these being induced must first be eliminated using the thermal screening
techniques described in chapter 3 of HarsBook, or the small scale adiabatic techniques
described in Chapter 6.
5.3.3. Devices using a constant surrounding temperature (e.g. a jacketed vessel

with a constant jacket temperature)
a) Isoperibolic calorimetry
The isoperibolic operation mode requires a constant surrounding temperature (e.g., a

jacketed vessel with constant jacket temperature) (e.g., reaction calorimeter RC1,
CALWIN, SETARAM DRC) [Grnlund (1990), Kssner (1987), Stockhausen et al. (1992),
Stockhausen (1996)]. Ideally, the calorimeter should be designed in such a way that the
maximum temperature difference between the reactor and the surroundings is limited to
few Kelvin. The advantages of this quasi-isothermal mode of operation can then be
used: mass and heat balances can be simplified and solved as independent equations.
For this type of calorimeter the heat balance equation Eq. 5.4 applies.
With some calorimeters both heat flow and heat balance calorimetry is possible, for
example by adding an additional vessel (filled with water or oil) between the reactor and
the jacket. By a combination of the heat flow from the reactor to this additional vessel
(the thermal ballast) and the heat flow from this vessel to the jacket, which is held
isothermal during the reaction, it is possible to determine the chemical heat flow
independently from the heat transfer value and also the change of the heat transfer value
during the reaction. (CALWIN by Moritz et al). Other isoperibolic calorimeters use a
second reference vessel in order to compensate for fluctuations in the temperature of the
heat exchange medium.
5-6
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
The reaction flask in an oil bath could be regarded as an isoperibolic calorimeter. The
main problem is that the value of UA in Eq. 5.4 is unknown. This problem is solved in
commercial calorimeters by calibration for the UA value using e.g., an electrical
resistance heater.
b) Power compensation calorimetry
In Power Compensation calorimetry the reactor is maintained at constant temperature.

The cooling jacket is also held isothermally some 10 to 20 oC below the temperature of
the reactor. The power supplied to an electrical heating element (preferably with a large
surface area) submerged within the reactor is then continuously manipulated so as to
maintain the reactor at the desired temperature. As an exothermic reaction develops the
power supplied by the heater is backed off by an amount exactly equal to the power
generated by the reaction under study. Electrical systems have much faster response
times than circulating oil loops so power compensation can give excellent temperature
control, particularly for reactions with fast kinetics. On the other hand the method may
not be suitable for use with high viscosity systems or those where fouling of the
electrical heater occurs.
5.4. Assessment of different types of reaction calorimeters
The advantages and disadvantages of the different calorimeter types and operation
modes are shown in the following table:
5-7
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
Calorimeter Advantages Disadvantages

type and
operation mode
Temperature difference in the
jacket must be measured with
high resolution
Useful if the overall heat transfer
Heat balance coefficient and/or the exchange area A feedback temperature control
calorimeter change strongly and non- linearly system for the reactor must be
Isothermal during the time of reaction or implemented in the device
TR = const. physical change If controlled temperature
changes are to be allowed (e.g.,
TJ = f(t) a linear temperature ramp), the
specific heat capacity of the
reaction mixture and reactor
internals must be known
The overall heat transfer
coefficient must be determined
(maybe at several times) by
Useful if the overall heat transfer calibration
Heat flow (or coefficient and/or the exchange area
heat flux) doesnt change strongly during the A feedback temperature control
calorimeter time of reaction or physical change system for the reactor must be
implemented in the device
Isothermal
TR = const. If controlled temperature
changes are are to be allowed
TJ = f(t) (e.g., a linear temperature ramp),
the specific heat capacity of the
reaction mixture and reactor
internals must be known
5-8
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
The response time of an A large surface area heater

electrical heating circuit is should be used to minimize
generally much faster than that the surface temperature of the
of a circulating oil loop. heating element.
Reactions with fast kinetics can Fouling on the surface of the
therefore often be studied with heater may occur in very
better temperature control. viscous systems or with heat
Power
Calibration steps for UA are not sensitive materials. The use of
compensation
required at the start and end of power compensation
Isothermal every reaction stage. For this calorimetry in these
TR = const. reason experiments are generally circumstances is not advised.
TJ = const. much quicker than the UA can vary during the course
equivalent heat flow experiment. of an experiment so
Reaction power outputs up to interpolation between the
100 Watts per liter can be baseline power at the start and
handled. end of the reaction is still
required. (This disadvantage
applies equally to heat flow
calorimetry.)
Low cost equipment The temperature in the reactor
Isoperibolic Similar to an isothermal depends on the heat release
calorimeter if the heat transfer rate
TR = f(t)
coefficient is high enough (i.e. No emergency cooling in the
TJ = const. the reactor temperature is only a case of a runaway in the lab
few degrees above the jacket
temperature).
Adiabatic temperature is proportional to reactions and reaction rate
TR = TJ conversion (for a single reaction) depend on temperature
Heat losses are relatively small apparatus Separation of temperature
very small fast reactions can be studied and concentration effects is
only possible by modelling
Can be hazardous for
exothermic reactions.
Careful hazard identification
and risk assessment required
before experiments are
started
5-9
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
5.5. Conclusions
Reaction calorimeters allow the user to perform chemical reactions and induce physical
changes (e.g., distillation, crystallisation) under desired conditions in the laboratory.
Usually they offer the possibility of monitoring on line the heat exchanged by these
processes. This is very useful as a basis for scale-up to the pilot or industrial scale. The
thermal risks associated with the process can be easily assessed. Other analytical devices
(e.g., on-line FTIR or Raman-spectroscopy, particle sizing probes, turbidity probes, pH
or other ion selective probes, etc) can be used in association with a calorimeter to obtain
data for modelling and process optimisation studies. It is thus strongly recommended
that reaction calorimetry measurements should be performed throughout the different
stages of the life of a chemical process (specially before the pilot production or if
significant changes are to be introduced.)
5-10
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
5.6. References
Baranek, B.; Gottfried, M.; Korfhage, K.; Pauer, W.; Schulz, K.; Moritz, H-U. Closed
Loop Control of Chemical Composition in Free Radical Copolymerization by Online
Reaction Monitoring via Calorimetry and IR-Spectroscopy, RC User Forum 1999, Bern,
Switzerland
Barton, J.; Rogers, R. Chemical reaction hazards - a guide. Second Edition, Institution
of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, England, 1997
Carloff, R.; Prob, A.; Reichert, K-H. Chem. Eng. Technol., 17, 406, 1994
Ferrara, I.; Baldo, L.; De Domenico, G.; Maschio, G. Study of polymerization of

methylmethacrylate by intergrated calorimetric approach, 2nd EFCE Congress of
Chemical Engineering, Montpellier, France
Ferrara, I.; Lister, D.G.; Maschio, G. Determinazione die coefficienti di scambio

termico in reattori agitati, mediante calorimetria a temperatura oscillante, 12 Convegno
su: La calorimetria di reazione per la sicurezza e lo sviluppo dei processi chimici,
Milano, Italy, 1998
Grnlund, F. J. Chem. Thermodynamics, 22, 563-572, 1990
Grnlund, F. Thermochim. Acta, 175, 63-72, 1991
Hemmninger, W.; Hhne, G. Calorimetry - Fundamentals and Practice. Verlag

Chemie, Weinheim, 1984
Kssner, A. Thermochim. Acta, 119, 59-79, 1987
Lathi, M.; Avela, A.; Seppl, J. Thermochim. Acta, 262, 13-31, 1995
Lathi, M.; Avela, A.; Seppl, J. Thermochim. Acta, 262, 33-43, 1995
Mackenberg, A. Verkrzung der Reaktionszeit der Semi-Batch-Copolymerisation von

Styrol/n-Butylmethacrylat in Emulsion mit Hilfe der Wrmebilanzkalorimetrie,
Paderborn, Germany, 1998
Mathot, V.B.F.; Calorimetry and Thermal Analysis of Polymers, Hanser Verlag,

Mnchen, 1994
Moritz, H.U. Reaktionskalorimetrie und sicherheitstechnische Aspekte von

Polyreaktionen, Auszug aus Praxis der Sicherheitstechnik, Vol. 3, Sichere Handhabung
chemischer Reaktionen, Hrsg. G. Kreysa u. O.-U. Langer, Dechema, 115 173, 1995
Mosebach, M.; Reichert, K-H. J. Applied Polym. Sci., Vol.66, 673-681, 1997
5-11
THEMATIC NETWORK ON
Nilsson, H.; Silvegren, C.; Trnell, B. A Calorimetric Investigation of Suspension and

Emulsion Polymerization of Vinylchloride, Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie,
112, Nr. 1731, 125-142, 1983
Pauer, W.; Tschonkou, J-P.; Moritz, H-U. Handbook, 4. DECHEMA Workshop

Reaktionskalorimetrie, Frankfurt, Germany, 1999
Schulz, K. Supensionspolymerisation von Styrol mit bifunktionellen Initiatoren,

diploma theses, Paderborn, Germany, 1996
Singh, J. J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind. 5, No. 3, 1992
Steinbach, J. Safety Assessment for Chemical Prozesses, Wiley-VCH Weinheim, 1998
Stockhausen, T. Entwicklung isothermer und isoperiboler Reaktionskalorimeter und

ihre Erprobung am Beispiel der Emulsionspolymerisation von Styrol, VDI Verlag,
Dsseldorf , Germany, 1996
Stockhausen, T.; Pr, J.; Moritz, H-U. 4th International Workshop on Polymer
Reaction Engineering, K.-H. Reichert u. H.-U. Moritz (Eds.), DECHEMA Monographie
Vol. 127, 341 349 1992
Tietze, A.; Prob, A.; Reichert, K-H. DECHEMA Monograph, 131, 673, 1995
Townsend, D.I. Thermochim. Acta 37, p 1-30, 1980
Tschonkou, J-P. Entwurf und Auslegung eines isothermen Druckkalorimeters fr den

Laborbetrieb unter besonderer Bercksichtigung der regelungstechnischen Optimierung,
diploma theses, Paderborn, Germany, 1996
5-12

5.reaction Calorimetry PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

5.reaction Calorimetry PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

5.reaction Calorimetry PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THEMATIC NETWORK ON

HarsNet HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF HIGHLY REACTIVE SYSTEMS

This HarsBook text has been prepared by a HarsNet working

5.3 Isothermal, isoperibolic and adiabatic modes.

Reaction calorimeters can operate in modes so that they closely approximate to

Isothermal calorimeters need an active temperature control system: this can be

For the more sophisticated devices, a quasi-adiabatic mode is achieved by actively

5.3.1. Heat balance equations

Mainly two types of calorimetry calculations can be described.

a) Heat balance calorimetry

q& r = m c c pc (Tcout - Tcin ) + q& loss [Eq. 5.1]

cpr: specific heat capacity of the reaction mass

b) Heat flow (or heat flux) calorimetry

In a second type of calorimetry calculation, the temperature of the jacket is kept

q& c = U A (Tr - Tj ) + q& loss [Eq. 5.5]

Significant changes in overall heat transfer coefficient as well as a change in effective

c) Temperature oscillation calorimetry

The principle of Temperature Oscillation Calorimetry was developed in the Technical

5.3.3. Devices using a constant surrounding temperature (e.g. a jacketed vessel

The isoperibolic operation mode requires a constant surrounding temperature (e.g., a

b) Power compensation calorimetry

In Power Compensation calorimetry the reactor is maintained at constant temperature.

5.4. Assessment of different types of reaction calorimeters

Calorimeter Advantages Disadvantages

The response time of an A large surface area heater

Ferrara, I.; Baldo, L.; De Domenico, G.; Maschio, G. Study of polymerization of

Ferrara, I.; Lister, D.G.; Maschio, G. Determinazione die coefficienti di scambio

Grnlund, F. J. Chem. Thermodynamics, 22, 563-572, 1990

Grnlund, F. Thermochim. Acta, 175, 63-72, 1991

Hemmninger, W.; Hhne, G. Calorimetry - Fundamentals and Practice. Verlag

Kssner, A. Thermochim. Acta, 119, 59-79, 1987

Mackenberg, A. Verkrzung der Reaktionszeit der Semi-Batch-Copolymerisation von

Mathot, V.B.F.; Calorimetry and Thermal Analysis of Polymers, Hanser Verlag,

Moritz, H.U. Reaktionskalorimetrie und sicherheitstechnische Aspekte von

Nilsson, H.; Silvegren, C.; Trnell, B. A Calorimetric Investigation of Suspension and

Pauer, W.; Tschonkou, J-P.; Moritz, H-U. Handbook, 4. DECHEMA Workshop

Schulz, K. Supensionspolymerisation von Styrol mit bifunktionellen Initiatoren,

Singh, J. J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind. 5, No. 3, 1992

Steinbach, J. Safety Assessment for Chemical Prozesses, Wiley-VCH Weinheim, 1998

Stockhausen, T. Entwicklung isothermer und isoperiboler Reaktionskalorimeter und

Townsend, D.I. Thermochim. Acta 37, p 1-30, 1980

Tschonkou, J-P. Entwurf und Auslegung eines isothermen Druckkalorimeters fr den

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.