SIR Report 2016
SIR Report 2016
SIR Report 2016
of
The Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
ISBN-
COMPLIMENTARY
Project Director
Economic Census 2013 Project
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
ParishankhyanBhaban
E-27/A, Agargaon, Dhaka
Email: dilderbbsbd@yahoo.com
This book or any portion thereof cannot be copied, reproduced or microfilmed without the prior approval
of the competent authority.
The full report is available in Compact Disc (CD) as well as BBS website: www.bbs.gov.bd.
Minister
Ministry of Planning
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh
Message
I am very glad to know that Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) is going to release the result of the
Survey on Investment from Remittance after completing its all activities successfully and quickly. I am
amazed to see the promptness of the project team to bringing out such an important survey report
including preparatory and field works within a period of four months. This bears the evidence of
strong commitment and capability of BBS in completing a survey with a very short span of time.
The present government has given due emphasis on evidence-based planning and policy making.
Hence, we have put the extreme importance to quality and timely release of statistical data. In view of
this, we have re-established the Statistics Division and renamed it as Statistics and Informatics
Division with some extended functions. In addition, we have enacted the Statistics Act 2013 and
developed the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS). All these efforts are
adding significant values to strengthen our statistical system.
Along with others, this report will provide useful information on investments which are directly
invested from the remittance received at household level. I believe that data provided in this report
could be used as the benchmark for appropriate policy intervention for ensuring the optimum use of
our remittance. Besides, it will significantly help the policy makers, planners, researchers,
administrators, development partners and other agencies for formulating their plans and programs for
overall development of the country.
My heartfelt thanks to all concerned of SID and BBS for bringing out this report ahead of stipulated
time. I do appreciate the hard work of project team to complete the survey with the quickest possible
time. I would like to thank persons both within and outside the government who contributed to the
smooth implementation of the survey and make it a success.
Message
I am happy to know that Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) has successfully conducted the Survey
on Investment from Remittance with the objective of identifying the proportion of investment that are
directly invested from the remittance by the households at the micro level. BBS has done an excellent
job in conducting the survey very quickly and publishing the report before the stipulated time.
Although the main focus of the survey is to unveil the investment which are directly invested from the
remittance at household level, some additional information relating to savings from remittance,
characteristics of expatriates as well as their households etc. are also given in the report. I believe that
the data presented in this report will provide a quality database that could be used by the policy
makers and others for formulating their plans and programs for the development of the country.
I thank Mr. K M Mozammel Hoq, Secretary of Statistics and Informatics Division and Mr. Mohammad
Abdul Wazed, Director General of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics for bringing out this report very
quickly. My special thanks to Mr. Md. Dilder Hossain, Project Director of Economic Census 2013
Project, his team members and all officials of BBS who have worked hard in completing the task in
timely manner. I also acknowledge the contribution of the persons both within and outside the
government for making the survey a success.
Dhaka M. A. Mannan, MP
June, 2016
Secretary
Statistics and Informatics Division
Ministry of Planning
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh
Foreword
The Survey of Investment from Remittance (SIR) is an instantly demand-based survey which was
carried out in a very short stipulated time. No sooner the planning of the survey was done, it had been
implemented after accomplishing a lot of pre-survey and post-survey activities. Really it was a
tremendous effort made by all concerns of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) in conducting the
survey in a hardcore situation. This is why, I express my deep contentment knowing that BBS is going
to publish the report today through overcoming especially the time-related challenge. I really feel
proud of the enhanced capabilities of the BBS officials.
The aim of the survey is to identify the sectors of investment and other related pattern and to estimate
average amount invested from remittance by the household members of the expatriates in Bangladesh
in 2015. I believe that it will serve as a very useful document for the planners and researchers of
Bangladesh in formulating evidence-based realistic policies on the use and investment of remittance. I
also hope that this report will be very useful for people of all corners who are interested in remittance-
based work.
Finally, I express my profound appreciation and thanks to Mr. Mohammad Abdul Wazed, Director
General of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Mr. Md. Baitul Amin Bhuiyan, Deputy Director General
of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Mr. Md. Dilder Hossain, Project Director of Economic Census
2013 Project and the Project Team and all other officials of BBS for their sincere efforts in timely
publication of this report. In this connection, I would like to pay my heartfelt homage to those
expatriates who send valuable foreign currencies to Bangladesh through untiring efforts in a foreign
country.
Preface
The aim of this report is to provide pattern of investment from remittance sent to Bangladesh by the
expatriates during last one year. I do believe and hope that this report will be very much useful for the
government in taking evidence-based policies to attract more productive investment from remittances
in the years to come and consequently to raise the GDP growth rate of the country. Besides,
academicians, researchers, students, expatriates and people from all respects will be benefited a lot
from this report.
I would like to thank the officials and employees of BBS who worked hard with their utmost sincerity
from planning to the implementation of the survey and thereupon bringing out this report much in
time. In particular, I would like to thank and acknowledge the heartfelt effort of Mr. Md. Dilder
Hossain, Project Director and his team in conducting the survey and publishing the report in a very
short time.
Any comments and suggestions for further improvement of the report will be highly appreciated.
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my profound regards and heartiest gratitude to Mr. K M Mozammel Hoq,
Secretary, Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) for his strong guidance and wholehearted support for
successfully conducting the survey and publishing the report. I would also like to extend my heartfelt
gratefulness to Mr. Mohammad Abdul Wazed, Director General, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS)
for his insightful views, valuable suggestions and recommendations for successful completion of the
survey. Their experiences on varying backgrounds, interest in and deep knowledge on the subject have
helped shape the report into its final form.
My deep gratitude to Mr. M. Shafiqul Islam, Additional Secretary and Mr. M.A. Mannan Howlader,
Additional Secretary (Development) of Statistics and Informatics Division and Mr. Md. Baitul Amin
Bhuiyan, Deputy Director General, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics for their outstanding support and
continuous guidance for preparing and publishing the report quickly.
Dr. Syed Shahadat Hossain, Institute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT) and Dr. Dipankar Roy,
Joint Director, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics deserve special thanks for their valuable inputs in
completion of the survey as well as the report. Mr. Hossain and Dr. Roy contributed notably in developing
the methodology of the survey including the sample design. The entire report has been reviewed by Mr.
Durga Pada Bhattacharjee, Deputy Secretary (Retd.) and Mr. Mahmudul Hoque, Deputy Secretary (Retd.).
Their contribution for enriching the report is highly admirable.
I gratefully acknowledge the contribution of all members of the Technical Committee for their cordial
guidance and advices to accomplish the survey successfully. I am also thankful to the members of the
Working Committee and the Report Finalization Committee for providing their valuable efforts in
finalizing this report. My warm thanks are also due to Mr. Md. Shamsul Alam, Ex-Director (CC) of BBS,
Mr. Md. Rafiqul Islam, Deputy Project Director, Mr. Mohiuddin Ahmed, Deputy Project Director, Reshma
Jesmin, Statistical Officer, Mr. Pratik Bhattacharjee, Statistical Officer and other staff of Economic Census
2013 Project for their untiring efforts in accomplishing the survey and completing this report at the
shortest possible time. My thanks also go to Mr. Abdur Rashid Sikder, National Consultant and Mr. Md.
Shazadur Rahman, Data Processing Consultant for their cooperation and assistance. I am especially
thankful to Mr. Md. Rezaul Karim, Assistant Statistical Officer for his uncompromising effort in
processing the data successfully. Finally, I am grateful to the respondents who extended their cooperation
for filling up the questionnaires giving time despite their involvement in their own works.
xiii
List of Tables
Table 1.1: Top 15 Recipient Countries of Remittance (In Billion US Dollar), 2008-2015 ....................................2
Table 1.2: Modes of Service Exports under GATS ................................................................................................2
Table: 3.1: Average Remittance Received by the Remittance Receiving Household by Division, 2016 and 2013......11
Table 3.2: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Received by Cash & Kind and by Division, 2016 and 2013 .12
Table 3.3: Percentage Distribution of Principal Remittance Receiver by Division, 2016 ...................................12
Table 3.4: Percentage Distribution of Principal Remittance Receiver by Sex and by Division, 2016 .................13
Table 3.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance by Mode of Sending and by Remitter Country, 2016 ...........14
Table 4.1: Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households According to Their Investment Decision by
Division, 2016 ....................................................................................................................................17
Table 4.2: Average Investment from Remittance by Division, 2016 ...................................................................18
Table 4.3: Investment by Category as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016 .................................18
Table 4.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Investment by Category and by Division, 2016 ....................20
Table 4.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Size of Investment and by Division, 2016 .......21
Table 4.6: Average Expenditures in Selected Heads from Remittance by Division, 2016 ....................................22
Table 4.7: Expenditures in Selected Heads as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016 .....................23
Table 4.8: Percentage Distribution of Expenditure in Selected Heads from Remittance by Division, 2016 .......24
Table 4.9: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Size of Expenditure in Selected
Heads by Division, 2016 ....................................................................................................................25
Table 4.10: Distribution of Loan Repayment as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016 ..................26
Table 5.1: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households According to their Savings Status by
Division, 2016 ....................................................................................................................................29
Table 5.2: Average Remittance Savings of RRHH by Division, 2016.................................................................30
Table 5.3: Savings by Category as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016 ......................................30
Table 5.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category, 2016 and 2013 ....................................31
Table 5.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category and by Division, 2016 .........................32
Table 5.6: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Range of Remittance Savings by
Division, 2016 ....................................................................................................................................33
Table 6.1: Distribution of Investment, Savings and Expenditure in Selected Heads as the Percentage of
Remittance Received in 2015 by Division, 2016 ...............................................................................35
Table 6.2: Expenditure for Land Purchase, House/Flat Purchase, Loan Repayment and Investment on
Construction and reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca house/ building/ flat/ boundary
wall/personal roads etc. as the Percentage of Remittance Received in 2015 by Division, 2016........36
xiv
Appendices ...........................................................................................................................................................37
A 1.1: Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Division .................................................................39
A 1.2: Percentage Distribution of Head of Remittance Receiving Household and General Household by Sex and
by Division ................................................................................................................................................39
A 1.3 a: Percentage Distribution of Head of RRHH by Level of Education and by Division, 2016....................39
A 1.3 b: Percentage Distribution of Head (Male) of RRHH by Level of Education and by Division, 2016 .......40
A 1.3 c: Percentage Distribution of Head (Female) of RRHH by Level of Education and by Division, 2016 ....40
A 1.4: Distribution of Head of RRHH as Principal Remittance Receiver by Division, 2016 ..............................40
A 1.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household Owning Land by Size and by Division, 2016 ...41
A 1.6: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household Owning Land by Category and by Division, 2016 .....41
A 2.1: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Sex and by Division ................................................................43
A 2.2: Gender Composition of Expatriates by Age Group, 2016 .........................................................................43
A 2.3 a: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Level of Education and by Division, 2016 ..........................43
A 2.3 b: Percentage Distribution of Male Expatriates by Level of Education and by Division, 2016 .................44
A 2.3 c: Percentage Distribution of Female Expatriates by Level of Education and by Division, 2016 ..............44
A 2.4: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Length of Living in Abroad and by Division, 2016 ...............44
A 2.5: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Occupation and by Living Country, 2016 ..............................45
A 2.6: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Level of Education and by Living Country, 2016 ..................46
A 2.7: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates Currently at Home by Reasons and by Division, 2016 ...............47
A 3.1: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Level of Education and Living Country .................................49
A 3.2: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Mode of Going Abroad and by Sex ........................................50
A 3.3: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Occupation and by Category of Own Land, 2016 ..................50
A 3.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Category of Investment and by Division ....50
A 3.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Expenditures in Selected Heads and by
Division .....................................................................................................................................................51
A 3.6: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Category of Savings and by Division .51
xv
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Flow of Remittance in Bangladesh over the Last 20 Years, 1995-96 to 2014-15 ...............................3
Figure 3.1: Average Remittance Received by RRHHs by Cash & Kind, 2016 and 2013 ....................................11
Figure 3.2: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Recieved by Cash & Kind, 2016 .........................................12
Figure 3.3: Percentage Distribution of Principal Remittance Receiver, 2016 ......................................................13
Figure 3.4: Percentage Distribution of Principal Remittance Receiver by Sex, 2016 ..........................................14
Figure 3.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance by Mode of Sending, 2016 ...................................................15
Figure 4.1: Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households by Investment Decision, 2016 ...........................17
Figure 4.2: Average Investment from Remittance by Division, 2016 ..................................................................18
Figure 4.3: Investment as Percentage of Total Remittance, 2016 ........................................................................19
Figure 4.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Investment by Category, 2016 .............................................21
Figure 4.5: Percentage Distribution of RRHHs by Size of Investment, 2016 ......................................................22
Figure 4.6: Average Expenditures in Selected Heads from Remittance by Division, 2016 .................................22
Figure 4.7: Expenditures in Selected Heads as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016 ....................24
Figure 4.8: Percentage Distribution of Expenditure in Selected Heads from Remittance, 2016..........................25
Figure 4.9: Percentage Distribution of RRHHs by Size of Expenditure in Selected Heads, 2016 .......................26
Figure 4.10: Loan Repayment as Percentage of Total Remittance, 2016.............................................................27
Figure 5.1: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households by Savings Status, 2016 .....................29
Figure 5.2: Average Remittance Savings by Divisions, 2016 ..............................................................................30
Figure 5.3: Saving as percentage of Total Remittance, 2016 ...............................................................................31
Figure 5.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category, 2016 and 2013 ..................................32
Figure 5.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category, 2016 ..................................................33
Figure 5.6: Remittance Receiving Household by Range of Remittance Savings, 2016 .......................................34
Figure 6.1: Investment, Savings and Expenditure in Selected Heads as the Percentage of Remittance Received
in 2015 by division, 2016..................................................................................................................35
Figure 6.2: Expenditure for Land Purchase, House/ Flat Purchase, Loan Repayment and Investment on
Construction and reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca house/ building/ flat/ boundary
wall/ personal roads etc. as the Percentage of Remittance Received in 2015 ...................................36
xvi
Acronyms
ASCII American Standard Code for Information Interchange
BBS Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
BMET Bureau of Manpower, Employment and Training
CSPro Census and Survey Processing System
EA Enumeration Area
FY Fiscal Year
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GNP Gross National Product
IMPS Integrated Multi-Purpose Sampling
IOM International Organization for Migration
MLM Multi-Level Marketing
OAC Other Asian Countries
OALC Other Arab League Countries
OAfC Other African Countries
OAuC Other Australian Countries
OEC Other European Countries
OMEC Other Middle East Countries
ONAC Other North American Countries
OSAC Other South American Countries
PPES Probability Proportional to Estimated Size
PSU Primary Sampling Unit
RN Random Number
RRHH Remittance Receiving Household
RS Random Sampling
SI Sampling Interval
SPSS Statistical Package for Social Survey
SRS Simple Random Sampling
TK. Taka
UAE United Arab Emirates
USA United States of America
xvii
xviii
Key Findings
Indicators Distribution
Average Remittance Received by RRHHs (In Taka)
In Cash 289493.20
In Kind 12690.75
Total 302183.95
Remittance Recieved in Cash & Kind (%)
In Cash 95.80
In Kind 4.20
Total 100
Principal Remittance Receiver (%)
Spouse 41.78
Offspring 2.22
Parents 44.18
Siblings 9.87
Others 1.95
Total 100
Principal Remittance Receiver by Sex (%)
Male 45.55
Female 54.45
Total 100
Remittance by Mode of Sending (%)
Bank 50.72
Western Union/ MoneyGram 12.66
Mobile Banking/ Bkash 14.31
Post office 0.21
Friends/ Relatives 5.45
Hundi 12.31
Known person 3.85
Others 0.48
Total 100
Investment Decision of RRHHs (%)
Invest 47.22
Do not Invest 52.78
Total 100
Investment by Category as Percentage of Total Remittance (%) 25.33
Construction or reconstruction of kutcha , semi - pucca or pucca house/ building/ flat/ boundary wall/ personal roads etc. 18.94
Pond digging/ soil filling/ construction or reconstruction of canals/ drains for irrigation 1.64
Construction or reconstruction of industry, business entity, shop etc. 1.28
Purchasing/ preparing of computer software 0.01
Expenditure for tree plantation and nursing the plants 0.25
Expenditure for poultry/ livestock/ fishery 0.49
Purchase of agriculture equipment or other machineries/ electronics goods for commercial use 0.24
Purchase of vehicles for commercial use 1.21
Cost of land ownership transfer 0.87
Others 0.40
RRHHs by Size of Investment (In Taka) from Remittance (%)
Less than 20000 59.75
20000 49999 10.15
50000 99999 9.26
100000 499999 17.80
500000 + 3.05
Total 100
xix
Indicators Distribution
Expenditures in Selected Heads as Percentage of Total Remittance (%) 24.45
Purchase of industry, business entities, shop etc. 0.43
Dwelling house/ flat purchase 0.65
Land purchase 9.08
Expenditure on own/ joint industry, business, shop 0.29
Purchase of share/ bond 0.11
MLM 0.01
Purchase of gold/ diamond jewelry etc. or alike valuables 0.94
Payment of loan taken for going abroad 10.87
Land mortgage 1.08
Others 1.00
Savings Status of RRHHs (%)
Savers 40.71
Non-savers 59.29
Total 100
Savings by Category as Percentage of Total Remittance (%) 8.40
Purchase of savings bond 0.45
Insurance 0.39
Savings account 4.19
DPS/ SDPS 1.00
Fixed deposit (one month & above) 0.61
Co-operative society 0.07
NGO 0.17
Friends & others 0.67
Savings at home 0.84
Others 0.01
RRHHs by Range (In Taka) of Remittance Savings (%)
Less than 20000 76.23
20000 49999 10.43
50000 99999 6.11
100000 499999 6.66
500000 + 0.57
Total 100
Investment, Savings and Expenditure as Percentage of Remittance Received (%) 58.18
Investment 25.33
Savings 8.40
Expenditures in selected heads 24.45
Head of RRHHs by Sex (%)
Male 48.22
Female 51.78
Total 100
Head of General Households by Sex (%)
Male 84.42
Female 15.58
Total 100
Level of Education of Head of RRHH (%)
No Education 28.56
Primary 28.95
Lower Secondary 27.19
Secondary 9.89
Higher Secondary 3.54
Graduate & Above 1.80
Dont Know 0.08
Total 100
xx
Indicators Distribution
RRHH by Size of Own Land (%)
Landless 2.23
0.01 - 0.49 acre 54.47
0.50 - 0.99 acre 16.86
1.00 - 2.49 acres 17.97
2.50 - 7.49 acres 7.65
7.50 + 0.82
Total 100
Age Group of Expatriates (%)
< 25 13.05
25 29 22.95
30 34 18.89
35 39 17.41
40 44 11.18
45 49 7.75
50 54 5.04
55 59 2.49
60 + 1.22
Total 100
Level of Education of Expatriates (%)
No Education 9.64
Primary 26.74
Lower Secondary 37.15
Secondary 15.33
Higher Secondary 8.30
Graduate & Above 2.58
Dont Know 0.26
Total 100
Expatriates by Length of Living in Abroad (In Year) (%)
Less than 1 6.85
1 to less than 3 17.54
3 to less than 5 16.86
5 to less than 10 33.16
10 years & above 25.60
Total 100
Expatriates by Occupation (%)
Job 28.34
Business 5.17
Labour 62.34
Student and Part-time job 0.83
House worker 1.15
Others 2.17
Total 100
Expatriates Currently at Home by Reasons (%)
On leave 80.16
Sick 6.17
War 0.60
Study completed 0.00
No work permit 1.93
Visa expired 4.97
Others 6.18
Total 100
xxi
xxii
Executive Summary
Currently, there are almost 8.6 million Bangladeshi migrants who are spread over the globe in
different countries, and they are continuously sending large amount of remittance at home. About two
million additional young people are added to the labour force every year but the country is unable to
create jobs to accommodate all of them. Therefore, the outflow of Bangladeshi workers will continue
until home economy can be capable to capture the supplementary labour forces. Remittance, as
identified one of the two main drivers of growth by World Bank (World Bank, 2011), will continue
play the important role in Bangladeshs development process. Hence, it is very important to ensure the
proper utilization of remittance. Accurate and reliable data can substantially help the policy-makers
and planners to take the appropriate policy for ensuring productive use of remittance. Keeping this
view in mind, the first round of the survey, the Survey on the Use of Remittance (SUR) 2013, covered
the wider spectrum of remittance uses in order to create a benchmark database. Nevertheless, the
survey uncovered many unfold stories regarding remittance uses together with expatriates
characteristics and their socio-economic condition at home.
The present round has highlighted the investment dimensions of remittance recognizing the demand of
the policy-makers for such information. How much of the remittance is directly invested in which
sectors by the remittance receiving household are the major concerns of this survey. Alongside that,
savings from remittance has duly been considered in the scope of the survey. Some salient features of
the expatriates together with remittance recipients have also been taken into account under the study.
xxiii
Seven Divisions were considered as seven separate stratums since SUR 2013 did not cover
Mymensingh Division that was created after conducting that survey. At the first stage, the required
number of RRHH-leading villages was selected for each of the divisions separately following
Probability Proportional to Estimated Size (PPES), and the PSUs of IMPS were chosen applying
Simple Random Sampling (SRS) technique. In the second stage, 20 RRHHs from each selected
village as well as 20 RRHHs from selected PSUs of IMPS were chosen using Systematic Random
Sampling technique. Before selection of samples, listing of households for identifying the RRHHs
was carried out in all selected villages and PSUs. A total of 10448 RRHHs were surveyed for data
collection.
The questionnaire was developed through a series of meetings and discussions. At first, the survey
team developed the draft questionnaire as a basis for in-house consultation. This draft was extensively
reviewed in a in-house meeting. It was revised several times to accommodate the recommendations of
various meeting. Ultimately, the questionnaire was finalised having the approval of the Technical
Committee, the highest technical body of the project.
Training, Data collection and Quality Control
Before data collection, training was imparted on different aspects of the survey in two phases. In the
first phase, Project Director together with some senior officials of BBS provided two days training to
the master trainers, who also worked as supervising officers, at the headquarters of BBS in Dhaka. In
the second phase, enumerators were trained on the same contents following the same sequence at the
former Regional Statistical Offices (RSOs). Immediately after the training, the survey workers went to
the field for data collection that was carried out during 01- 09 March 2016. A total of 415 employees
of BBS from field offices as well as headquarters were employed in data collection. Besides, a total of
62 officers of BBS, most of whom were District Statistical Officers, were engaged to supervise the
data collection. In addition, some senior officials of Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) and BBS
closely monitored the training and data collection activities.
Data Editing and Coding
In addition to the conventional method of data edition followed by BBS, a new technique was applied
to ensure high quality of the data. All filled-in questionnaires were primarily edited by some selected
efficient supervising officers at all Divisional Statistics Offices under the leadership of Joint Directors
(divisional heads) so that any flaw observed in data can be rectified instantly communicating with the
data collector as well as respondents. After that, all questionnaires were brought to headquarters for
further processing. A group of experienced staff of BBS under the supervision of the survey team
edited all data manually once again, and made coding of some responses. An instruction manual with
the editing and coding guidelines was also prepared, and editors and coders were provided training on
the manual.
Data Processing, Tabulation and Dissemination
After completion of editing, a group of experienced BBS staffs carried out the task of data entry. Data
entry template was developed by using CSPro software. A strong data dictionary based on the
questionnaire was created during the preparation of template. To avoid errors and inconsistencies, a
logical check was integrated with the software that carefully followed throughout the data entry.
xxiv
Nationally 25.33% of the total remittance received is invested in various sectors
Of the total remittance received in 2015, 25.33% is invested in various sectors by the remittance
receiving households. Among the divisions, the highest investment is evident in Dhaka, 27.37%
followed by Barisal 26.49%, Khulna 25.93%, Chittagong 24.96%, Sylhet 22.60%, Rajshahi 22.41%
and the lowest in Rangpur 18.85%.
The lions share of the total investment from remittance is invested in construction sector
At the national level, the lions share (74.78%) of the total investment from remittance is invested in
construction or reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca house/ building/ flat/ boundary wall/
personal roads etc. Investments in all other sectors are noted very minor that varies from 1% to 7%.
Repayment for loan taken for going abroad occupies significant share of total remittance
Nationally, a significant share of total remittance, 10.87% is used for repaying loan that was borrowed
to meet the expenditure for going abroad. In case of divisions, some variations are observed. However
in most of the divisions notable portion of the remittance is used for loan repayment.
Spending for land purchase is fairly substantial
Of the total remittance received, a substantial portion, 9.08% is used for land purchase. These figures
vary importantly across the divisions; the highest spending for land purchase is recorded in Rangpur
(20.64%) while the lowest is evident in Chittagong (4.87%).
Less than half of the total RRHHs make savings
At national level, less than half of the total remittance receiving households (40.71%) has reported
that they have saved part of the remittance they received in 2015, while the majority (59.29%) has
reported that they have not saved any amount from the remittance.
Proportion of savings from remittance is low
Of the total remittance, at national level, 8.40% is saved in various forms by the remittance receiving
households. Across divisions, the proportions of savings from remittance fairly vary; the highest
proportion of savings from total remittance in various forms is observed in Khulna 9.20% followed by
Rajshahi 8.76%, Chittagong 8.58%, Dhaka 8.48%, Sylhet 8.28%, Barisal 7.06% and the lowest in
Rangpur 5.36%.
Bank is the main custodian of savings made out of remittance
At the national level, bank is the biggest custodian of savings made out of remittances. Most of the
savers kept their money with banks in different forms such as savings account (49.86%), DPS/SDPS
(11.86%), fixed deposit (7.24%) and purchase of savings bond (5.31%). Banks are appeared as the
main destination for savings in all divisions as well.
Female headed households are dominant in case of RRHHs
The characteristic of the remittance receiving households shows that more than half (51.78%) are
female-headed households compared to only 15.58% female heads in general households.
xxvi
Most of the remittance receiving households own land
Only 2.23% remittance receiving households are landless compared to 9.58% landless households for
all households. In case of divisions, these figures are also found quite low, that vary between 0.39%
(the minimum in Sylhet) to 3.37% (the maximum in Dhaka).
Male with youth are the dominant in migrant workers
Most of the migrant workers are males (97.38%), and of them more than 54.90% are below 35 years.
In case of females 55.11% are below 35.
Nearly three-fourth of the migrants have been staying aboard for less than 10 years
It is notable that nearly three-fourth of the migrant workers are staying abroad for less than 10 years
which ranges from less than one year to less than 10 years with the highest 33.16% staying between 5
and less than then 10 years.
Occupation of migrant workers varies across regions
Occupation of migrant workers varies widely among the regions where they work. In the Middle East
countries and Asian countries, they are mostly engaged in job or labour. However, in some countries
like South Africa and Other Middle East Countries (OMEC), they do some business also.
Majority of the migrants are less educated
The majority of the migrants are less educated while insignificant portion of them have attained higher
education. The highest, 63.89% are educated lower than SSC level and only 2.58% have obtained
graduation degree. It is found that some (9.64%) of the expatriates have no education at all.
xxvii
xxviii
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Chapter I: Introduction
1.1 Remittance in Economic Development
Foreign remittance generally means the earnings of international migrant workers sent back from the
country of employment to the country of origin. In the modern era, remittance has been appeared as a
significant driving force of development for most of the developing countries, creating employment
opportunities for the home workers to foreign countries. It supports a nation prominently to increase
its national income and to alleviate poverty. In addition, the foreign remittance accelerates the
economic growth, diminish the pressure of unemployment, and boost up the capacity for import
payments. At micro level, remittance helps increase consumption, savings and investment. At the
household level, using foreign remittance, the expatriates family members can fulfill their basic needs
and can meet their educational, medical and other expenses readily. Besides, they can acquire assets
such as land, home, car, furniture etc. Remittance also contributes to increase the social recognition as
well as standard of living of the expatriates family in their locality.
If wage earners remittance is invested in productive fields, then also they generate positive multiplier
effects (Stahl and Arnold 1986). Adelman and Taylor (1990) revealed that, for every dollar Mexico
received from migrants working abroad, its GNP increased by $2.69 to $3.17, depending on whether
remittance were received by urban or rural households. Remittance is shown a very stable source of
foreign exchange (Ratha, 2005). So, it is manifested that, in the labour-sending countries like
Bangladesh, remittance play a very significant role for their overall economic development.
Figures in Table 1.1 depict that in 2015, India and China, the two economic giant of Asia, received the
largest amount of remittance followed by Philippines, France and Mexico respectively, while
Bangladesh earn about US$15.80 billion securing tenth position. India and China are likely to
gradually reduce the export of natural persons with their continued growth creating an opportunity for
other countries including Bangladesh to export more persons.
1
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 1.1: Top 15 Recipient Countries of Remittance (In Billion US Dollar), 2008-2015
Country Year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
India 49.98 49.20 53.48 62.50 68.82 69.97 70.97 72.20
China 47.49 41.60 52.46 61.58 57.99 59.49 61.49 63.90
Philippines 18.63 19.96 21.56 23.05 24.61 26.70 27.90 29.70
France 26.04 16.06 19.46 22.56 22.05 23.34 23.94 24.60
Mexico 16.28 22.08 22.08 23.59 23.37 23.02 24.50 25.70
Nigeria 19.21 18.37 19.82 20.62 20.63 20.89 20.88 20.89
Egypt 8.69 7.15 12.45 14.32 19.24 17.83 19.83 20.40
Germany 8.94 12.34 12.79 14.52 15.14 15.20 16.60 17.50
Pakistan 7.04 8.72 9.69 12.26 14.01 14.63 17.80 20.10
Bangladesh 10.97 10.74 11.28 12.96 14.24 13.86 15.10 15.80
Belgium 10.42 10.44 10.29 10.98 10.16 11.11 11.11 11.10
Vietnam 6.81 6.02 8.26 8.60 10.00 11.00 11.80 12.30
Ukraine 10.15 5.94 6.54 7.82 8.45 7.67 8.45 6.20
Spain 9.07 8.95 9.10 9.92 9.66 9.58 10.10 10.50
Indonesia 6.78 6.79 6.92 6.92 7.21 7.62 8.66 10.51
Source: World Bank data is used for all countries and years. Data access on April 24, 2016 on 11.00 A.M.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remittance#Top_recipient_countries)
Recognizing the importance of trade in services which includes export of natural person, the World Trade
organization (WTO) formulated the General Agreement of Trade in Services (GATS) that entered into force
in January 1995 as a result of the Uruguay Round negotiations. The treaty was created to extend the
multilateral trading system to service sector, in the same way the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT) provides such a system for merchandise trade. The GATS agreement covers four modes of
supply for the delivery of services in cross-border trade. They are shown in table 2.
Modes Criteria
Service delivered within the territory of the Member, from the territory of
Mode 1: Cross-border supply
another Member
Service delivered outside the territory of the Member, in the territory of
Mode 2: Consumption abroad
another Member, to a service consumer of the Member
Service delivered within the territory of the Member, through the
Mode 3: Commercial presence
commercial presence of the supplier
Service delivered within the territory of the Member, with supplier present
Mode 4: Presence of a natural person
as a natural person
As can be seen from table 1.2, mode 3 and 4 are related to migration and directly contribute to remittance.
Following the adoption of GATS, remittance will continue playing a prominent role globally, more so in case
of developing countries like Bangladesh. Along with the future growth and development trajectory of
developing countries, poverty, condition of health, and spending on education by households will also depend
on remittance in these countries.
Source: The Report on the Survey on the Use of Remittance 2013
2
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Figure 1.1: Flow of Remittance in Bangladesh over the Last 20 Years, 1995-96 to 2014-15
35
30
25
15.32
20
14.46
14.23
10.99
12.84
11.65
15 Billion
9.69
US Dollar
7.91
1.53
10
Growth
4.8
3.85
6
3.37
3.06
1.22
1.95
1.88
1.71
2.5
1.48
-5
In 2015, the total remittance was recorded 15.32 billion US Dollar, which registered a bit rise in
absolute term from 2014 by 14.23 billion US Dollar. However, this accounted for about 12.83% of
national income and 49.10% of total export earnings of the country.
Analysing the figures of GDP of last 20 years, it is observed that the growth has been increased
significantly over the period, and in 2016, it has been recorded 7.05%, a remarkable achievement for
Bangladesh, when the per capita income is US$1,466. Studies found that remittance has a notable
impact in lading up the growth of GDP and per capita income as well.
On top of macro-level impact, remittance directly contributes to poverty alleviation. Observing the
socio-economic condition, it is found that most of the Bangladeshi expatriates belong to a group of
either poor or nearly poor. Hence, in absence of remittance, there is a possibility of falling their
household into poverty trap, and it will trigger up the aggregate number of the poor in the country. As
a result, it would have been difficult to eradicate poverty at the existing rate.
3
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Moreover, remittance has a significant social dimension in Bangladesh. Expatriates family at home
can enjoy better livelihood in respect of fooding, clothing, housing, education, health, social spending
etc. as expatriates continuously send money to home.
Remittance has also a spatial aspect in Bangladesh. According to International Organization for
Migration (IOM), although people from all over the country fly abroad for work, Comilla, Chittagong,
Tangail, Brahmanbaria and Dhaka are the districts that occupy the highest number of migrants.
Overall development and quality of life in these districts are likely to be affected more than that of
other districts by remittance.
Considering the various dimensions of remittance, the maiden survey on remittance was carried out by
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) in 2013, especially to know its usages at micro level. Even
then, there are some data gaps in identifying the direct investment from the remittance properly at the
household level. In order to meet the data gaps, the current survey has been undertaken with the
objective of helping the policy makers to take evidence-based decision to attract the direct investment
in production from remittance.
The present round has highlighted the investment dimension of remittance recognizing the demand of
the policy-maker for such information. How much of the remittance is directly invested in which
sectors by the remittance receiving household are the major concerns of this survey. Alongside that,
savings from remittance has duly been considered. In addition to that, some salient features of the
expatriates together with remittance recipients have been taken into account under the scope of the
survey.
4
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
5
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
6
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
7
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
former Regional Statistical Offices (RSOs). Most of the trainees both the supervising officers and the
enumerators- were extremely vibrant in the training.
Immediately after the training, the survey workers went to the field for data collection that was carried
out during 01- 09 March 2016. A total of 415 employees of BBS from field offices as well as
headquarters were employed in data collection. Besides, a total of 64 officers of BBS, most of them
were District Statistical Officers, were engaged to supervise the data collection. Alongside the
supervision of the data collection activities, they were responsible for taking care of any untoward
problem arisen during data collection in the field, and they stayed at the field until the data collection
was completed. In addition, some senior officials of Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) and
BBS closely monitored the data collection. The Project Team was extremely engaged in successful
completion of data collection.
2.4 Data Editing and Coding
Data editing refers to the activity of checking and cleaning data that have already been collected from
the field. In addition to the conventional method of data edition followed by BBS, a new technique
was applied to ensure high quality of data. All filled-in questionnaires were primarily edited by some
selected efficient supervising officers at all Divisional Statistics Offices under the leadership of Joint
Directors (divisional heads) so that any flaw observed in data could be rectified instantly
communicating with the data collector as well as respondents. After that, all questionnaires were
brought to headquarters for further processing. A group of experienced staff of BBS under the
supervision of the survey team edited all data manually once again, and made coding of some
responses. An instruction manual with the editing and coding guidelines was also prepared, and
editors and coders were provided training on the manual beforehand.
2.5 Data Processing
Data processing involves a number of steps such as data entry, appending and merging files, data
validation (further checking, editing and imputation) and so on. After completion of editing and
coding, a group of experienced staff of BBS carried out the task of data entry. Before data entry, a
template was developed using CSPro software with a strong data dictionary based on the
questionnaire adding unique ID and values of the items to be entered. To avoid errors and
inconsistencies, a logic check was also fitted with data entry template which was reviewed again and
again, and eventually finalized for use. As data was captured by a number of BBS officials, a number
of files were generated. After completion of the data entry, these files were appended and merged to
generate a single one. Validation was accomplished after appending and merging files by checking the
number of variables, the cases, wild codes, missing values and consistencies. It was also checked
whether the number of variables generated was matched with the number of variables in the data set.
If an error was identified during data validation, the related questionnaire was checked and in some
cases it was sent back to the survey team for review and decision. In some cases, members of the
survey team revisited the field to collect the actual response of the relevant respondent.
Four software named CSPro, STATA, SPSS and Excel were used for processing the survey data.
CSPro was used for data entry and editing, STATA and SPSS for both tabulation and data analysis,
and Excel for converting the STATA or SPSS files to table format.
8
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
2.6 Tabulation
A tabulation plan first designed by the survey team was shared with the committee headed by the
Director General of BBS in order to make it more user-friendly. The committee suggested some
valuable modifications which were successively incorporated. Furthermore, the committee
recommended to reshaping the report focusing the investment chapter at the beginning followed by
savings. Additionally, the committee suggested to placing detailed methodology of the survey,
characteristics of the expatriates and remittance receivers and other components as appendices in the
report. Accordingly, the survey team followed the advice of the committee, finalised the structure of
the report and ultimately, completed the tabulation plan.
2.7 Data Analysis
Survey results were analyzed in tabular form using STATA and SPSS software. Major variables, in
terms of percentage, were explained vertically (columns) and cross tabulation by another related
variables horizontally. In the analysis, variations of the magnitude of major variables were described
by category and by division.
2.8 Data Dissemination
The final report has been disseminated both in electronic form such as CD and hard copy as book.
Results are available in the website of BBS. Some data may also be published in other publications of
BBS such as Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh, National Accounts Statistics and Monthly
Statistical Bulletin etc.
2.9 Scope and Coverage of the Survey
Geographically, the survey covered the entire area of the country including urban and rural areas.
A list of villages holding the dominance in terms of remittance receiving households (RRHH)
across the country was prepared and used to cover the rural areas. On the other hand, the PSUs of
IMPS was purposively used to cover especially urban areas as there had no other alternative.
2.10 Limitations of the Survey
For successful completion of the survey, all methodological aspects were applied very carefully. Even
then, the survey has a few caveats as mentioned below:
Due to time constraint, the sample design of the first round, the Survey on the Use
of Remittance 2013, was predominantly used to conduct this survey. Nevertheless,
listing in the sample areas was newly done to identify the current RRHHs.
Subsequently, the ultimate sample, RRHHs, was randomly selected following the
new list of RRHHs.
Although the sampling frame covered the entire country, only five villages from
each Upazila were included into the sampling frame. Therefore, weighting was
made on the basis of the number of RRHHs in selected five villages and in PSUs of
IMPS.
9
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
10
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table: 3.1: Average Remittance Received by the Remittance Receiving Household by Division,
2016 and 2013
Division Average Remittance Received
2016 2013
Total In Cash *In Kind Total In Cash *In Kind
(In Tk.) (In Tk.) (In Tk.) (In Tk.) (In Tk.) (In Tk.)
National 302183.95 289493.20 12690.75 205642.00 197395.00 8247.00
Barisal 285860.20 272507.02 13353.18 192611.00 184664.00 7947.00
Chittagong 298032.70 287577.70 10455.00 215707.00 208150.00 7557.00
Dhaka 359833.09 339556.59 20276.50 219740.00 210390.00 9350.00
Khulna 233235.16 225879.75 7355.41 191094.00 187248.00 6846.00
Rajshahi 242920.89 234751.18 8169.70 167700.00 157676.00 10024.00
Rangpur 234449.05 226656.30 7792.75 182925.00 176195.00 6730.00
Sylhet 333125.46 321401.58 11723.88 189359.00 182144.00 7215.00
(*In kind means the value of goods sent to Bangladesh by the expatriates.)
How much remittance in cash and kind was received by the RRHHs in 2015 is explained in Table 3.1.
Figures indicate that at national level, the average remittance received by the RRHHs in the last year
is Tk.3,02,183.95 of which Tk.2,89,493.20 is received in cash and Tk.12,690.75 in kind. Among the
divisions, the highest average remittance received is recorded in Dhaka (Tk.3,59,833.09) followed by
Sylhet (Tk.3,33,125.46) and the lowest in Khulna (Tk.2,33,235.16).
Figure 3.1: Average Remittance Received by RRHHs by Cash & Kind, 2016 and 2013
289493.20
197395.00
In Taka
12690.75
8247.00
In Cash
In Kind
2016 2013
Remittance Type
Comparing the figures of the two surveys, 2016 & 2013, it is noticed that average remittance received
has been increased from Tk.2,05,642.00 in 2013 to Tk.3,02,183.95 in 2016, which implies 46.95%
rise over the last three years .
11
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 3.2: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Received by Cash & Kind and by Division,
2016 and 2013
Division Cash & Kind
2016 2013
* *
Total In Cash In Kind Total In Cash In Kind
National 100.00 95.80 4.20 100.00 95.99 4.01
Barisal 100.00 95.33 4.67 100.00 95.87 4.13
Chittagong 100.00 96.49 3.51 100.00 96.50 3.50
Dhaka 100.00 94.37 5.63 100.00 95.74 4.26
Khulna 100.00 96.85 3.15 100.00 96.47 3.53
Rajshahi 100.00 96.64 3.36 100.00 94.02 5.98
Rangpur 100.00 96.68 3.32 100.00 96.32 3.68
Sylhet 100.00 96.48 3.52 100.00 96.19 3.81
(*In kind means the value of goods sent to Bangladesh by the expatriates.)
The current survey, like as the first round, has also collected information on the composition of the
total remittance in terms of cash and kind. The results portrayed in Table 3.2 explains that major
portion of the remittance is received in cash (95.80%), although some are received in kind (4.20%).
These figures are evident almost the same across the divisions. Comparing the data of the two surveys,
no significant changes are found.
Figure 3.2: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Recieved by Cash & Kind, 2016
4.20%
In Cash
In Kind
95.80%
12
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 3.3 describes the principal remittance receivers who receive the remittance at home on behalf of
expatriates. Findings show that among the categories, parents are the dominant remittance receiver
(44.18%) followed by spouse (41.78%). The similar findings were come out in first round, from
which it was revealed that in 44.63% cases, it is none other than parents who received the remittance.
Figure 3.3: Percentage Distribution of Principal Remittance Receiver, 2016
9.87% 1.95%
41.78%
Spouse
Offspring
Parents
Siblings
Others
44.18%
2.22%
It is important to note that these figures vary across the divisions; the largest number of expatriates
from Barisal, Chittagong, Dhaka, Rangpur and Sylhet send money to their parents while the highest
share of expatriates from Khulna and Rajshahi send money to their spouses. A different picture is
evident in Sylhet where parents hold the highest share with 38.27% followed by spouse 28.58%, but
siblings also occupy a significant share 26.05%, which is the case appeared only in Sylhet.
Table 3.4: Percentage Distribution of Principal Remittance Receiver by Sex and by Division,
2016
Division Remittance Receiver
Total Male Female
National 100.00 45.55 54.45
Barisal 100.00 46.70 53.30
Chittagong 100.00 45.04 54.96
Dhaka 100.00 43.06 56.94
Khulna 100.00 44.24 55.76
Rajshahi 100.00 43.81 56.19
Rangpur 100.00 47.92 52.08
Sylhet 100.00 62.79 37.21
Table 3.4 illustrates the figures of principal remittance receivers by sex. It is important to note that
female has been evident as the dominant principal remittance receiver with the proportion of 54.45%
while male is 45.55% who receive the remittance at home.
13
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
45.55%
54.45%
Male
Female
Across the division, figures expose the same scenario except Sylhet where male holds significantly
large share, 62.79% while female occupies decisively less share, 37.21%.
Table 3.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance by Mode of Sending and by Remitter Country,
2016
Mode of Sending
Western Mobile
Living country Total Post Friends/ Known
Bank Union/ Banking Hundi Others
office Relatives person
MoneyGram / Bkash
Total 100.00 50.72 12.66 14.31 0.21 5.45 12.31 3.85 0.48
Saudi Arabia 100.00 47.38 11.45 16.98 0.27 5.16 14.51 3.83 0.42
UAE 100.00 56.10 10.46 11.65 0.00 5.08 13.04 3.59 0.08
Malaysia 100.00 49.51 17.77 14.11 0.01 4.77 8.16 4.35 1.31
Oman 100.00 44.30 12.92 16.66 0.29 6.34 15.38 3.92 0.19
Qatar 100.00 56.33 15.64 13.62 0.18 4.68 7.76 1.58 0.20
Singapore 100.00 42.03 10.87 9.12 0.40 9.62 22.52 4.96 0.49
Kuwait 100.00 62.37 10.49 9.56 0.98 6.82 6.81 2.71 0.26
Bahrain 100.00 51.32 12.32 17.76 0.02 6.43 7.17 4.46 0.52
Italy 100.00 64.56 9.10 7.39 0.25 5.48 10.07 3.15 0.00
United Kingdom 100.00 70.79 10.97 8.16 0.20 5.18 3.51 0.27 0.92
Maldives 100.00 43.05 8.76 35.29 0.67 3.74 4.91 2.86 0.72
Iraq 100.00 58.60 19.84 13.52 0.00 1.75 1.05 4.30 0.94
Lebanon 100.00 47.62 22.79 8.36 0.24 5.69 5.26 9.32 0.72
Libya 100.00 33.84 21.57 24.86 0.00 7.87 9.15 2.12 0.59
USA 100.00 65.13 18.74 3.20 0.00 0.00 2.67 5.76 4.49
Jordan 100.00 57.55 12.21 19.83 0.39 2.91 2.51 4.60 0.00
South Africa 100.00 34.96 13.20 3.34 0.00 11.04 23.64 11.77 2.05
Brunei Darussalam 100.00 44.42 15.48 14.99 0.00 6.79 11.30 7.03 0.00
Mauritius 100.00 35.90 19.89 30.80 0.00 8.16 5.24 0.00 0.00
France 100.00 62.35 22.71 2.28 0.00 2.79 5.36 4.51 0.00
Greece 100.00 41.26 19.31 18.20 0.00 3.92 15.90 1.41 0.00
14
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Mode of Sending
Western Mobile
Living country Total Post Friends/ Known
Bank Union/ Banking Hundi Others
office Relatives person
MoneyGram / Bkash
South Korea 100.00 72.81 6.64 2.30 0.76 1.42 8.59 7.49 0.00
Spain 100.00 55.39 14.83 23.05 0.00 0.28 5.80 0.64 0.00
Canada 100.00 78.00 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Germany 100.00 31.43 8.32 29.58 0.00 10.21 13.90 0.00 6.55
Australia 100.00 85.20 14.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Japan 100.00 63.21 16.70 0.00 0.00 16.70 0.00 3.39 0.00
OSAC 100.00 69.44 0.00 7.42 0.00 13.09 9.58 0.00 0.47
ONAC 100.00 45.05 16.03 14.35 0.00 0.24 18.78 5.56 0.00
OMEC 100.00 57.18 2.05 11.81 0.00 5.46 20.57 2.94 0.00
OEC 100.00 51.20 14.89 7.02 1.94 1.30 6.54 17.12 0.00
OAuC 100.00 61.13 11.38 12.58 0.00 7.14 6.28 0.00 1.49
OALC 100.00 59.44 10.67 12.34 0.00 9.19 5.32 1.63 1.41
OAfC 100.00 48.35 21.02 5.17 0.00 4.12 17.77 3.57 0.00
OAC 100.00 50.50 12.08 13.68 0.00 2.32 15.60 3.45 2.38
(Note: In above table, the Sub groups of Others Country are given in Apendix-5).
Figures in Table 3.5 describe the various channels through which remittance is sent to home from
abroad. Out of the total remittance, 77.90% is remitted through formal channels, of which bank have
been appeared at the most preferable channels with the highest share, 50.72% followed by Mobile
Banking/ Bkash 14.31%, Western Union/ MoneyGram with 12.66% and Post Office 0.21%. In
addition, much amount of the remittance is sent through informal channel, 22.09%, of which Hundi
occupies the largest share with 12.31% followed by Friends/ Relatives 5.45% and the known person
3.85%.
Figure 3.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance by Mode of Sending, 2016
3.85% 0.48%
5.45% 12.31%
0.21% Bank
Post office
Friends/ Relatives
Hundi
14.31%
Known person
50.72% Others
12.66%
15
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
16
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 4.1 explains what proportion of the remittance receiving households invested remittance in
2015. The findings show that at national level, nearly half of the total remittance receiving households
(47.22%) did investment from the remittance while majority 52.78% did not. Across divisions, Barisal
ranks the top with the highest remittance receiving households (63.09%) that did investment followed
by Chittagong, 51.73%, Rangpur and Khulna nearly equal (47.50% and 47.27% respectively), Dhaka,
40.82% and the lowest in Rajshahi 38.20%. It can be noted that the figures vary importantly across the
divisions.
Figure 4.1: Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households by Investment Decision, 2016
47.22%
52.78%
Invest
Do not Invest
17
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 4.2: Average Investment from Figure 4.2: Average Investment from Remittance by
Remittance by Division, 2016 Division, 2016
Division Average Investment from
98469.36
76546.50
75713.90
75288.30
74401.31
Remittance (In Taka)
60484.25
54442.06
National 76546.50
44194.47
Barisal 75713.90
In Taka
Chittagong 74401.31
Dhaka 98469.36
Khulna 60484.25
Rajshahi 54442.06
Rangpur 44194.47
Division
Sylhet 75288.30
Table 4.2 shows the figures of average investment that are invested by the remittance receiving
households in 2015. Average investment from remittance at national level is accounted Tk.76,546.50
in 2015. These figures significantly vary across the divisions. The highest investment from remittance
is recorded in Dhaka (Tk.98,469.36) followed by Barisal (Tk.75,713.90), Sylhet (Tk.75,288.30) and
Chittagong (Tk.74,401.31). However, the lowest is recorded in Rangpur, Tk.44,194.47, which is
substantially lower than the national average investment from remittance.
18
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 4.3 depicts the figures on what portions of the remittance received in 2015 are invested in which
sectors. Of the total remittance received, 25.33% is invested in various sectors by the remittance
receiving households. Among the divisions, the highest investment is evident in Dhaka, 27.37%
followed by Barisal 26.49%, Khulna 25.93% and the lowest in Rangpur 18.85%.
Figure 4.3: Investment as Percentage of Total Remittance, 2016
26.49%
25.93%
25.33%
24.96%
27.37%
22.60%
22.41%
18.85%
Percentage
19
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 4.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Investment by Category and by Division, 2016
Investment Division
Category National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Construction or 74.78 78.47 82.82 64.70 80.05 73.18 70.77 74.61
reconstruction of
kutcha , semi - pucca
or pucca house/
building/ flat/
boundary wall/
personal roads etc.
Pond digging/ soil 6.47 5.62 6.68 7.83 2.83 3.61 4.43 6.34
filling/ construction
or reconstruction of
canals/ drains for
irrigation
Construction or 5.07 1.43 1.65 7.98 5.09 13.36 6.26 4.46
reconstruction of
industry, business
entity, shop etc.
Purchasing/ 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.02 0.08
preparing of
computer software
Expenditure for tree 0.99 1.74 1.29 0.85 0.29 0.60 0.48 0.75
plantation and
nursing the plants
Expenditure for 1.94 1.40 1.91 1.83 2.15 2.02 4.14 1.91
poultry/ livestock/
fishery
Purchase of 0.93 0.96 0.37 0.95 1.92 0.30 1.74 3.62
agriculture
equipment or other
machineries/
electronics goods for
commercial use
Purchase of vehicles 4.78 1.53 1.25 11.18 1.33 0.95 2.35 2.47
for commercial use
Cost of land 3.42 7.42 2.51 2.83 5.64 4.28 8.35 3.67
ownership transfer
Others 1.58 1.41 1.47 1.85 0.65 1.63 1.43 2.08
(Note: Others include car purchase for rent-a-car, establishment of deep tube well, setting electric pole etc.)
Figures in Table 4.4 describe the proportions of investments in various categories by division.
Nationally, the lions share (74.78%) of the total investment from remittance is invested in
construction or reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca house/ building/ flat/ boundary wall/
personal roads etc. Investments in all other sectors are found very minor that varies from 1% to 7%.
20
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
(1: Construction or reconstruction of kutcha , semi - pucca or pucca house/ building/ flat/ boundary wall/ personal roads etc., 2: Pond
digging/ soil filling/ construction or reconstruction of canals/ drains for irrigation , 3: Construction or reconstruction of industry,
business entity, shop etc., 4: Purchasing/ preparing of computer software, 5: Expenditure for tree plantation and nursing the plants, 6:
Expenditure for poultry/ livestock/ fishery, 7: Purchase of agriculture equipment or other machineries/ electronics goods for
commercial use, 8: Purchase of vehicles for commercial use, 9: Cost of land ownership transfer, 10: Others)
In case of divisions, no significant differences are observed i.e. in all divisions most of the
investments are noted in construction or reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca house/
building/ flat/ boundary wall/ personal roads etc. Investments in all other sectors are apparent the same
as national figures.
Table 4.5 shows the percentage distribution of remittance receiving households by size of investment.
At national level, the highest portion of remittance receiving households, 59.75% invested in the range
of less than Tk. 20,000.00 followed by 17.80% in Tk.1,00,000.00 - 4,99,999.00, 10.15% in
Tk.20,000.00 49,999.00 and 9.26% in Tk.50,000.00 99,999.00. The figure also shows that some of
households, i.e. 3.05% invested more than Tk.0.50 million in 2015.
21
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
10.15%
59.75%
Across the divisions, the highest number of remittance receiving household invested in the range of
less than Tk. 20,000.00. Among the divisions, the highest share of remittance receiving households
that invested in the range of Tk.1,00,000.00 to 4,99,999.00 is recorded in Barisal (22.40%) followed
by Dhaka (19.85%) and Sylhet (19.09%), which are almost equal, and the lowest in Rangpur
(15.80%).
Table 4.6: Average Expenditures in Selected Heads Figure 4.6: Average Expenditures in Selected Heads
from Remittance by Division, 2016 from Remittance by Division, 2016
Division Average Expenditure in Selected
90712.86
86551.12
112243.67
84166.95
82064.18
Barisal 82064.18
Chittagong 54274.00
In Taka
Dhaka 90712.86
Khulna 84166.95
Rajshahi 86551.12
Rangpur 112243.67
Division
Sylhet 56962.77
Table 4.6 displays the figures of average expenditure in selected heads those were assumed to be
substantial in addition to the investment. In 2015, the average expenditure of remittance receiving
households in selected heads from remittance at national level is Tk.73,879.46 which is slightly less
than the average investment (Tk.76,546.50).
22
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Large variations across the division are evident from the table. The highest expenditure in selected
heads from remittance is noted in Rangpur (Tk.1,12,243.67) where the lowest average investment
(Tk.44,194.47) is recorded. Chittagong and Sylhet, having a slight difference, are found at the bottom
with average expenditures of Tk.54,274.00 and Tk.56,962.77 respectively while the average
investments in these divisions are found quite high that are Tk.74,401.31 in Chittagong and
Tk.75,288.30 in Sylhet. So, there is a paradox observed between investment and expenditures in
selected heads from remittance.
Table 4.7: Expenditures in Selected Heads as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016
Heads of Expenditures Division
National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 24.45 28.71 18.21 25.21 36.09 35.63 47.88 17.10
Purchase of industry, 0.43 0.07 0.87 0.12 0.11 0.36 0.12 0.14
business entities, shop
etc.
Dwelling house/ flat 0.65 0.07 0.71 0.72 1.51 0.11 0.30 0.05
purchase
Land purchase 9.08 15.00 4.87 9.59 11.72 16.40 20.64 10.77
Expenditure on own/ joint 0.29 0.08 0.19 0.14 0.51 0.29 1.04 1.07
industry, business, shop
Purchase of share/ bond 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLM 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.21 0.00
Purchase of gold/ 0.94 1.11 1.44 0.63 0.65 0.41 0.31 0.57
diamond Jewelry etc. or
alike valuables
Repayment of loan taken 10.87 11.07 7.83 12.58 19.08 13.96 17.27 4.23
for going abroad
Land mortgage 1.08 0.26 0.58 0.53 2.46 3.01 7.74 0.07
Others 1.00 1.03 1.72 0.57 0.05 1.05 0.22 0.20
(Note: Others include dowry, expenditure for sending family members abroad, others loan repayment etc. Purchase of bond includes
Premium/ Investment/ Wage earners development bond)
Figures in Table 4.7 represent the percentages of the remittance spent in selected heads from the total
remittance received in 2015. Of the total remittance, 24.45% is spent in selected heads while 25.33%
is invested in various sectors by the remittance receiving households. Across the divisions, the
expenditures vary importantly; the highest expenditure from total remittance in selected heads is
noticed in Rangpur 47.88% followed by Khulna 36.09%, Rajshahi 35.63% and the lowest in Sylhet
17.10%.
23
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Figure 4.7: Expenditures in Selected Heads as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016
47.88%
36.09%
35.63%
28.71%
25.21%
24.45%
18.21%
17.10%
Percentage
Division
24
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 4.8 illustrates the proportions of expenditure in selected heads by division. Nationally, the
largest amount (44.46%) is used for loan repayment that was borrowed likely by the expatriates to
meet the expenditure for going abroad. Nevertheless, a substantial portion, 37.13% is used for land
purchase. Expenditures in all other heads are reflected insignificant.
Figure 4.8: Percentage Distribution of Expenditure in Selected Heads from Remittance, 2016
Land purchase
MLM
In case of divisions, no significant differences are observed i.e. most of the remittance other than
investment are used for loan repayment and land purchase. However, across the divisions,
dissimilarities are noticed between loan repayment and land purchase; in some divisions (Barisal,
Rajshahi, Rangpur and Sylhet) land purchase occupies the biggest share while in other divisions, Loan
Repayment scores the top.
Table 4.9: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household by Size of Expenditure
in Selected Heads by Division, 2016
Expenditure Size Division
(In Taka) National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Less than 20000 51.61 42.56 58.21 50.56 37.88 46.08 30.35 66.90
20000 49999 10.00 10.83 12.45 7.82 10.54 8.45 6.28 6.88
50000 99999 12.86 18.81 12.25 10.65 18.70 14.15 16.58 7.73
100000 499999 23.37 26.24 15.82 27.32 31.36 28.68 44.84 15.98
500000 + 2.17 1.56 1.27 3.65 1.52 2.65 1.94 2.51
Table 4.5 shows the percentage distribution of remittance receiving households by size of expenditure
in selected heads in 2015. It is important to note that, like as investment, at national level, the majority
of remittance receiving households, 51.61% did spending in the range of less than Tk. 20,000.00
followed by 23.37% in Tk.1,00,000.00 - 4,99,999.00, 12.86% in Tk.50,000 99,999.00, and only
10.00% in Tk. 20,000 49,999.00. The figure also indicates that some of the households, i.e. 2.17%
made expenditure of more than Tk.0.50 million in selected heads in 2015.
25
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Figure 4.9: Percentage Distribution of RRHHs by Size of Expenditure in Selected Heads, 2016
23.37%
2.17%
500000 + (Tk.)
12.86%
51.61%
10.00%
Across divisions, no significant variation is observed i.e. the highest number of remittance receiving
household in all divisions spent in the range of Tk. Less than 20,000.00 in selected heads except
Rangpur. Among all divisions, Rangpur scores the top having the largest share of remittance receiving
households (44.84%) that did spending in the range of Tk.1,00,000.00 to 4,99,999.00 in selected heads
and Chittagong scores the lowest with 15.82% that did the same.
Table 4.10: Distribution of Loan Repayment as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016
Division Loan Repayment for Going Abroad Other Loans Repayment
% of RRHH % of Amount % of RRHH % of Amount
National 32.51 10.87 3.29 1.08
Barisal 33.30 11.07 0.94 0.26
Chittagong 27.44 7.83 1.66 0.58
Dhaka 37.27 12.58 1.87 0.53
Khulna 46.38 19.08 6.27 2.46
Rajshahi 32.79 13.96 7.33 3.01
Rangpur 37.05 17.27 18.01 7.74
Sylhet 17.09 4.23 0.19 0.07
Loan repayment has been distinctly analysed as it has been appeared as a substantial category of
spending from remittance. Among other categories, special focus was given on the loan repayment
that was borrowed probably by the expatriates for going abroad. Table 4.10 portrays the figures on the
percentage of remittance receiving households that paid loan for going abroad and for other purposes.
Alongside that, figures on the amounts that were paid by RRHHs against the loans for both purposes
are also described in Table 4.10. It is evident from the table that nationally, 32.51% of the remittance
receiving households paid aggregately 10.87% of the total remittance received in 2015 for loan
repayment for going abroad while very small percentage (3.29%) of RRHHs paid insignificant amount
(1.08%) for other loans repayment.
26
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
46.38%
37.27%
37.05%
33.30%
32.79%
32.51%
27.44%
Loan Repayment for
18.01%
Going Abroad
17.09%
Percentage
Other Loans
7.33%
6.27%
Repayment
3.29%
1.87%
0.19%
1.66%
0.94%
Division
Across divisions, the highest percentage of RRHHs (46.38%) that paid loan for going abroad is
evident in Khulna with the biggest amount (19.08%) of the total remittance received in 2015 while it
is the lowest in Sylhet (17.09%) with remarkably lower amount that is only 4.23 % of the total
remittance received in 2015.
27
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
28
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Chapter V: Savings
Generally savings is a common characteristic of the households in Bangladesh. They usually save
from the precautionary objective. However, they do savings not only to meet unpredicted expenditure
but also to do investment. But neither all savers invest nor all savings are invested. So, there is a
divergence between saving and investment that are made out of remittance. Considering this
phenomenon, different dimensions of saving have been analysed in this chapter.
Table 5.1: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households According to their
Savings Status by Division, 2016
Division Remittance Receiving Household
Total Savers Non-savers
National 100.00 40.71 59.29
Barisal 100.00 37.55 62.45
Chittagong 100.00 47.85 52.15
Dhaka 100.00 36.02 63.98
Khulna 100.00 37.49 62.51
Rajshahi 100.00 33.28 66.72
Rangpur 100.00 31.11 68.89
Sylhet 100.00 39.80 60.20
Figures in Table 5.1 describe the savings status of remittance receiving households. At national level,
less than half of the total remittance receiving households (40.71%) has reported that they have saved
part of the remittance they received in 2015, while the majority (59.29%) has reported that they have
not saved any amount from the remittance in 2015.
Figure 5.1: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Households by Savings Status, 2016
40.71%
59.29%
Savers
Non-savers
Across divisions, the highest savers have been recorded in Chittagong (47.85%) followed by Sylhet
(39.80%) and the lowest in Rangpur (31.11%). It implies that the percentage share of households, who
save from the remittance they received, varies across divisions.
29
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 5.2: Average Remittance Savings of RRHH Figure 5.2: Average Remittance Savings by Divisions,
by Division, 2016 2016
Average Savings from Remittance
27570.00
25560.82
25385.45
30528.64
Division
(In taka)
21464.12
21287.70
20174.41
Total 25385.45
12559.41
Barisal 20174.41
In Taka
Chittagong 25560.82
Dhaka 30528.64
Khulna 21464.12
Rajshahi 21287.70
Rangpur 12559.41
Division
Sylhet 27570.00
Table 5.2 displays data on average remittance savings of RRHHs by division. It is manifested from the
table that national average remittance savings stands at Tk. 25,385.45 whereas it is higher than the
national average in Dhaka (Tk. 30,528.64), Sylhet (Tk. 27,570.00) and Chittagong (Tk. 25,560.82)
divisions and lower in Barisal (Tk. 20,174.41), Khulna (Tk. 21,464.12), Rajshahi (Tk. 21,287.70) and
Rangpur (Tk. 12,559.41).
Table 5.3: Savings by Category as Percentage of Total Remittance by Division, 2016
Category of Savings Division
National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 8.40 7.06 8.58 8.48 9.20 8.76 5.36 8.28
Purchase of savings bond 0.45 0.18 0.04 0.87 1.52 0.32 0.00 0.13
Insurance 0.39 0.20 0.49 0.37 0.13 0.47 0.18 0.40
Savings account 4.19 2.72 3.95 4.54 4.70 4.44 1.99 5.36
DPS/ SDPS 1.00 2.02 1.06 0.69 0.84 1.32 1.25 1.13
Fixed deposit (one month 0.61 0.87 1.03 0.40 0.03 0.23 0.18 0.17
& above)
Co-operative society 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.04
NGO 0.17 0.06 0.21 0.17 0.10 0.28 0.10 0.02
Friends & others 0.67 0.37 0.65 0.84 0.82 0.55 0.76 0.03
Savings at home 0.84 0.48 0.99 0.58 1.07 1.11 0.76 0.99
Others 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.00
(Note: Others include Clubs, Local Associations etc.)
Table 5.3 presents the proportions of the remittance that were saved in different forms by the
remittance receiving households from the total remittance they received in 2015. Of the total
remittance, at national level, 8.40% is saved in various forms by the remittance receiving households.
30
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
9.20%
8.76%
8.58%
8.48%
8.40%
8.28%
7.06%
5.36%
Percentage
Across divisions, the proportions of savings from remittance fairly vary; the highest proportion of
savings from the total remittance in various forms is observed in Khulna 9.20% followed by Rajshahi
8.76%, Chittagong 8.58%, Dhaka 8.48% and the lowest in Rangpur 5.36%.
Table 5.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category, 2016 and 2013
Category of Savings Survey Year
2016 2013
Total 100.00 100.00
Purchase of savings bond 5.31 5.79
Insurance 4.66 4.89
Savings account 49.86 66.07
DPS/ SDPS 11.86 7.13
Fixed Deposit (one month & above) 7.24 5.02
Co-operative society 0.88 0.24
NGO 2.04 -
Friends & others 7.98 1.07
Savings at home 10.00 9.14
Others 0.16 0.65
(Note: Others include Clubs, Local Associations etc.)
Table 5.4 shows the distribution of savings in different forms saved by the households from the
remittance they received in 2015. It is evident from the table that two-third of the savers keep their
savings in bank in various forms. Among the forms with banks, savings account has been reported as
the most preferable custodian of savings with unparalleled share 49.86% followed by DPS/ SDPS,
11.86%, Fixed deposit, 7.24% and so on. Conversely, some of savings are kept in hands at home
10.00% while friends & others with 7.98% have also been noted as a custodian of savings of
remittance.
31
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Figure 5.4: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category, 2016 and 2013
49.86%
Percentage of Remittance Savings
66.07%
11.86%
10.00%
9.14%
7.13%
7.98%
7.24%
5.79%
5.02%
4.89%
5.31%
4.66%
0.65%
0.24%
1.07%
0.88%
0.16%
2016
2013
Category of Savings
Note: NGO is not shown in the graph as there is no information in that field in 2013
Table 5.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Savings by Category and by Division, 2016
Category of Division
Savings National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Purchase of savings 5.31 2.55 0.49 10.29 16.46 3.60 0.00 1.55
bond
Insurance 4.66 2.84 5.69 4.32 1.40 5.36 3.34 4.85
Savings account 49.86 38.49 46.08 53.51 51.06 50.66 37.23 64.77
DPS/ SDPS 11.86 28.60 12.33 8.11 9.16 15.06 23.25 13.64
Fixed deposit (one 7.24 12.31 12.02 4.70 0.30 2.63 3.29 2.09
month & above)
Co-operative 0.88 1.18 1.66 0.28 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.51
society
NGO 2.04 0.79 2.47 2.00 1.11 3.15 1.82 0.23
Friends & others 7.98 5.29 7.60 9.91 8.92 6.28 14.20 0.38
Savings at home 10.00 6.82 11.55 6.82 11.59 12.64 14.15 11.98
Others 0.16 1.14 0.11 0.04 0.00 0.12 2.21 0.00
(Note: Others include Clubs, Local Associations etc.)
Table 5.5 showcases the proportions of savings in various forms by division. As mentioned earlier
(also observed from the table), nationally, the largest amount (49.86%) is saved on savings account
with the bank followed by DPS/SDPS, 11.86%.
32
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Co-operative society
NGO
49.86% Others
In case of divisions, moderate differences are observed. Though, like as national scenario, major
portions of the savings from remittance in all divisions are kept on savings account with the bank
followed by DPS/SDPS, the figures vary prominently across divisions. As usually, savers in Barisal
prefer the most savings account (38.49%); yet, they prefer DPS/SDPS (28.60%) equally. The same
picture is also evident in Rangpur where DPS/SDPS has been appeared as the second choice of
savings with a substantial share 23.25% although saving account constitutes the top score (37.23%).
Table 5.6 depicts the state of remittance receiving household by range of savings from remittance. At
national level, out of total remittance receiving households that did savings in 2015, the highest
76.23% saved less than Tk.20,000.00 followed by 10.43% with the savings of Tk.20,000.00
Tk.49,999.00, 6.66% with Tk.1,00,000.00 Tk.4,99,999.00, 6.11% with Tk.50,000.00Tk.99,999.00,
and only 0.57% saved more than Tk.5,00,000.00.
33
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
10.43%
Less than 20000 (Tk.)
20000 - 49999 (Tk.)
50000 - 99999 (Tk.)
100000 - 499999 (Tk.)
500000 + (Tk.)
76.23%
Diversified savings patterns are observed across divisions; although the highest percentage, like as
national figure, in all divisions saves less than Tk.20,000.00 followed by the range of Tk.20,000.00-
Tk.49,999.00, the figures vary significantly across divisions. In the range of less than Tk.20,000.00,
the highest, 45.87% of remittance receiving households that do savings is found in Khulna and the
lowest, 26.63%, which is significantly less than the highest figure (45.87%), in Sylhet. Observing the
higher ranges of savings, significant variations are noted; the households that do savings more than
Tk.0.50 million are recorded highest in Dhaka (3.06%) while it is the lowest in Barisal (0.27%), which
is multi-times lower than the highest figure (3.06%).
34
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
35.63%
28.71%
27.37%
26.49%
25.93%
24.45%
25.21%
25.33%
24.96%
22.60%
22.41%
18.21%
9.20%
7.06%
8.40%
8.76%
18.85%
17.10%
8.48%
8.58%
5.36%
8.28%
These figures are significantly dissimilar across the divisions. However, the highest figure is recorded
in Rangpur (72.08%), which, so far, indicates that consumption spending from remittance in Rangpur
is comparatively low. On the other hand, the total figure of investment, savings and expenditure in
selected heads is the lowest in Sylhet, 47.98%, which perhaps implies that consumption spending
from remittance in this division is moderately high.
35
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Table 6.2: Expenditure for Land Purchase, House/Flat Purchase, Loan Repayment and
Investment on Construction and reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca
house/ building/ flat/ boundary wall/personal roads etc. as the Percentage of
Remittance Received in 2015 by Division, 2016
Division Expenditure Expenditure for Expenditure for Loan Investment on Total
for Land House/ Flat Repayment (Loan for Construction and (2+3+4+5)
Purchase Purchase going abroad) reconstruction of kutcha.....
1 2 3 4 5 6
National 9.08 0.65 10.87 18.94 39.54
Barisal 15.00 0.07 11.07 20.78 46.92
Chittagong 4.87 0.71 7.83 20.68 34.09
Dhaka 9.59 0.72 12.58 17.71 40.61
Khulna 11.72 1.51 19.08 20.76 53.06
Rajshahi 16.40 0.11 13.96 16.40 46.87
Rangpur 20.64 0.30 17.27 13.34 51.56
Sylhet 10.77 0.05 4.23 16.86 31.91
Table 6.2 illustrates the figures of the percentages of remittance used in some specific sectors out of
total remittance received in 2015. It is assumed that these sectors are dominant in catching up the
remittance in our country. In total, a significant share, 39.54%, of the total remittance received in 2015
is used in the mentioned four sectors at national level. Across the division, these figures are
importantly varied; it is the highest in Khulna, 53.06% while the lowest is recorded in Sylhet, 31.91%.
Figure 6.2: Expenditure for Land Purchase, House/ Flat Purchase, Loan Repayment and
Investment on Construction and reconstruction of kutcha, semi-pucca or pucca
house/ building/ flat/ boundary wall/ personal roads etc. as the Percentage of
Remittance Received in 2015
18.94%
10.87%
9.08%
0.65%
36
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
APPENDICES
37
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
38
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
A 1.3 a: Percentage Distribution of Head of RRHH by Level of Education and by Division, 2016
Level of Education
No
Division Total Lower Higher Graduate Dont
Education Primary Secondary
Secondary Secondary & Above Know
National 100.00 28.56 28.95 27.19 9.89 3.54 1.80 0.08
Barisal 100.00 16.83 32.84 29.37 14.43 3.76 2.78 0.00
Chittagong 100.00 21.56 28.98 30.00 13.15 4.58 1.69 0.04
Dhaka 100.00 36.65 28.58 24.41 6.60 2.17 1.59 0.00
Khulna 100.00 32.08 30.16 26.94 5.41 3.27 1.82 0.32
Rajshahi 100.00 35.23 25.79 26.71 7.49 3.02 1.75 0.00
Rangpur 100.00 32.34 24.96 24.60 10.22 4.86 2.77 0.25
Sylhet 100.00 30.35 33.10 22.02 9.52 2.66 2.01 0.34
(Note: No education: Never attend school/not passed class-I, Primary: Class-I to Class-V, Lower Secondary- Class-VI to Class-IX, Secondary: Class-X,
Higher Secondary: Class-XII, Graduate & Above: Degree (Pass)/ Hons/ Post Graduate/ M.S/Ph.D./ equivalent)
39
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
A 1.3 b: Percentage Distribution of Head (Male) of RRHH by Level of Education and by Division, 2016
Level of Education
No
Division Total Lower Higher Graduate Dont
Education Primary Secondary
Secondary Secondary & Above Know
National 100.00 35.13 29.11 19.55 9.24 4.15 2.72 0.10
Barisal 100.00 22.72 32.05 25.64 10.84 4.60 4.16 0.00
Chittagong 100.00 24.85 30.93 23.40 12.50 5.80 2.52 0.00
Dhaka 100.00 46.66 27.70 15.03 6.28 1.64 2.69 0.00
Khulna 100.00 43.11 26.26 20.13 3.80 4.34 1.73 0.63
Rajshahi 100.00 43.61 21.78 18.49 8.86 4.57 2.68 0.00
Rangpur 100.00 39.21 25.84 14.80 9.60 6.46 4.09 0.00
Sylhet 100.00 31.06 37.50 15.72 9.85 2.20 3.13 0.54
(Note: No education: Never attend school/not passed class-I, Primary: Class-I to Class-V, Lower Secondary- Class-VI to Class-IX, Secondary: Class-X,
Higher Secondary: Class-XII, Graduate & Above: Degree (Pass)/ Hons/ Post Graduate/ M.S/Ph.D./ equivalent)
A 1.3 c: Percentage Distribution of Head (Female) of RRHH by Level of Education and by Division, 2016
Level of Education
No
Division Total Lower Higher Graduate Dont
Education Primary Secondary
Secondary Secondary & Above Know
National 100.00 22.43 28.79 34.30 10.49 2.97 0.95 0.06
Barisal 100.00 9.36 33.84 34.09 18.97 2.69 1.04 0.00
Chittagong 100.00 18.93 27.40 35.29 13.67 3.60 1.03 0.07
Dhaka 100.00 27.60 29.38 32.88 6.88 2.65 0.60 0.00
Khulna 100.00 21.05 34.06 33.74 7.02 2.21 1.91 0.02
Rajshahi 100.00 27.26 29.61 34.53 6.19 1.55 0.87 0.00
Rangpur 100.00 24.29 23.93 36.07 10.94 2.99 1.23 0.54
Sylhet 100.00 29.14 25.64 32.70 8.96 3.43 0.12 0.00
(Note: No education: Never attend school/not passed class-I, Primary: Class-I to Class-V, Lower Secondary- Class-VI to Class-IX, Secondary: Class-X,
Higher Secondary: Class-XII, Graduate & Above: Degree (Pass)/ Hons/ Post Graduate/ M.S/Ph.D./ equivalent)
40
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
A 1.5: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household Owning Land by Size and by
Division, 2016
Division
Size of Land
National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Landless 2.23 1.12 1.58 3.37 3.04 3.17 1.38 0.39
0.01 - 0.49 acre 54.47 41.42 63.71 57.97 45.53 45.92 34.78 28.14
0.50 - 0.99 acre 16.86 22.51 15.41 16.10 18.61 20.95 17.35 16.41
1.00 - 2.49 acres 17.97 24.64 13.56 16.23 22.29 20.27 29.92 31.01
2.50 - 7.49 acres 7.65 8.97 5.30 5.65 9.28 9.15 15.29 21.14
7.50 + 0.82 1.34 0.44 0.69 1.26 0.55 1.28 2.91
A 1.6: Percentage Distribution of Remittance Receiving Household Owning Land by Category
and by Division, 2016
Category of Land
Division Total Landless Homestead Agricultural Commercial Others
with
Courtyard
National 100.00 2.23 96.89 61.60 2.68 33.64
Barisal 100.00 1.12 97.74 78.14 2.54 53.99
Chittagong 100.00 1.58 98.07 55.25 2.90 45.04
Dhaka 100.00 3.37 95.37 55.70 1.93 18.61
Khulna 100.00 3.04 96.21 71.87 2.77 25.79
Rajshahi 100.00 3.17 94.74 68.86 1.98 24.72
Rangpur 100.00 1.38 96.57 77.70 3.64 32.54
Sylhet 100.00 0.39 99.61 78.58 4.79 34.92
(Note: Others include pond, graveyard, garden, abandoned land etc,)
41
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
42
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
43
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
A 2.3 b: Percentage Distribution of Male Expatriates by Level of Education and by Division, 2016
Level of Education
No
Division Total Lower Higher Graduate Dont
Education Primary Secondary
Secondary Secondary & Above Know
National 100.00 9.48 26.55 37.37 15.47 8.25 2.62 0.26
Barisal 100.00 4.44 26.24 33.77 20.15 10.67 4.73 0.00
Chittagong 100.00 6.52 23.98 39.74 17.20 9.30 2.99 0.28
Dhaka 100.00 12.39 27.00 38.35 13.57 6.61 1.60 0.49
Khulna 100.00 13.60 30.87 30.95 15.80 6.23 2.50 0.05
Rajshahi 100.00 14.28 27.99 34.07 12.66 9.53 1.42 0.04
Rangpur 100.00 11.24 23.45 36.49 15.17 11.04 2.54 0.07
Sylhet 100.00 7.88 36.35 33.51 11.82 5.82 4.51 0.12
(Note: No education: Never attend school/not passed class-I, Primary: Class-I to Class-V, Lower Secondary- Class-VI to Class-IX, Secondary: Class-X,
Higher Secondary: Class-XII, Graduate & Above: Degree (Pass)/ Hons/ Post Graduate/ M.S/ Ph.D./ equivalent)
A 2.3 c: Percentage Distribution of Female Expatriates by Level of Education and by Division, 2016
Level of Education
No
Division Total
Education Primary Lower Higher Graduate Dont
Secondary
Secondary Secondary & Above Know
National 100.00 15.42 33.63 28.93 10.31 10.28 1.43 0.00
Barisal 100.00 4.02 44.27 39.53 7.45 0.44 4.30 0.00
Chittagong 100.00 2.12 18.51 30.92 20.66 27.79 0.00 0.00
Dhaka 100.00 22.76 38.11 33.03 3.20 1.49 1.40 0.00
Khulna 100.00 21.78 47.47 11.79 10.85 5.06 3.06 0.00
Rajshahi 100.00 33.51 45.82 6.69 2.68 8.17 3.12 0.00
Rangpur 100.00 21.51 21.91 45.29 11.29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sylhet 100.00 18.39 49.64 19.65 7.33 2.50 2.50 0.00
(Note: No education: Never attend school/not passed class-I, Primary: Class-I to Class-V, Lower Secondary- Class-VI to Class-IX, Secondary: Class-X,
Higher Secondary: Class-XII, Graduate & Above: Degree (Pass)/ Hons/ Post Graduate/ M.S/ Ph.D./ equivalent)
A 2.4: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Length of Living in Abroad and by Division, 2016
Length of Living in Abroad (Year)
Division 10 years &
Total Less than 1 1 to less than 3 3 to less than 5 5 to less than 10
Above
National 100.00 6.85 17.54 16.86 33.16 25.60
Barisal 100.00 5.59 16.38 18.47 34.80 24.76
Chittagong 100.00 5.18 16.08 18.67 31.66 28.42
Dhaka 100.00 7.78 16.51 14.92 33.80 27.00
Khulna 100.00 10.98 24.53 14.17 33.23 17.08
Rajshahi 100.00 9.69 18.30 13.26 39.87 18.88
Rangpur 100.00 7.64 23.17 16.52 36.94 15.73
Sylhet 100.00 5.15 17.97 20.18 28.44 28.26
44
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
45
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
A 2.6: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates by Level of Education and by Living Country, 2016
Level of Education
Country No Lower Higher Graduate Dont
Total Primary Secondary
Education Secondary Secondary & Above Know
Total 100.00 9.64 26.74 37.15 15.33 8.30 2.58 0.26
Saudi Arabia 100.00 11.03 28.11 35.63 15.18 7.38 2.52 0.15
United Arab Emirates 100.00 8.36 28.03 39.10 16.00 6.10 1.96 0.44
Malaysia 100.00 13.87 31.64 33.84 12.04 6.67 1.64 0.29
Oman 100.00 9.30 33.75 37.21 12.71 6.61 0.40 0.01
Qatar 100.00 9.01 18.36 42.67 18.14 8.89 2.14 0.79
Singapore 100.00 3.95 7.84 30.43 30.72 24.84 2.21 0.00
Kuwait 100.00 9.27 27.11 38.04 18.28 5.92 1.20 0.16
Bahrain 100.00 8.59 22.71 53.53 9.52 3.78 1.06 0.82
Italy 100.00 2.96 14.54 39.69 23.31 13.95 5.55 0.00
United Kingdom 100.00 6.11 13.34 18.89 19.38 21.41 20.58 0.30
Maldives 100.00 9.94 41.98 39.63 7.14 0.98 0.25 0.09
Iraq 100.00 12.61 27.79 46.19 7.57 3.98 1.85 0.00
Lebanon 100.00 12.29 26.70 48.31 8.29 4.42 0.00 0.00
Libya 100.00 17.14 17.88 53.07 10.06 1.10 0.00 0.76
United States of America 100.00 0.00 18.11 12.92 13.72 17.66 37.58 0.00
Jordan 100.00 15.65 46.27 32.18 5.91 0.00 0.00 0.00
South Africa 100.00 2.60 3.86 51.40 19.17 17.27 3.36 2.34
Brunei Darussalam 100.00 8.16 35.41 36.78 13.06 5.94 0.66 0.00
Mauritius 100.00 8.10 45.21 45.63 0.52 0.53 0.00 0.00
France 100.00 0.00 36.12 9.97 14.15 31.96 7.81 0.00
Greece 100.00 1.26 25.22 24.64 27.63 3.92 17.34 0.00
South Korea 100.00 0.00 0.00 15.20 24.73 53.00 7.06 0.00
Spain 100.00 0.41 0.81 18.56 24.43 18.27 37.52 0.00
Canada 100.00 0.00 0.00 3.54 16.25 36.07 44.14 0.00
Germany 100.00 0.00 1.07 33.69 25.35 13.35 26.54 0.00
Australia 100.00 0.00 3.23 0.00 16.95 0.00 79.82 0.00
Japan 100.00 0.00 0.00 9.27 24.33 18.69 0.00 47.72
OSAC 100.00 11.45 15.34 42.95 7.94 17.60 4.73 0.00
ONAC 100.00 1.39 19.41 36.52 13.03 29.65 0.00 0.00
OMEC 100.00 8.59 32.08 40.51 10.83 4.56 3.44 0.00
OEC 100.00 14.71 17.94 36.07 13.35 16.17 1.76 0.00
OAuC 100.00 1.79 33.87 27.91 5.89 3.01 27.53 0.00
OALC 100.00 11.75 27.87 54.48 2.00 3.90 0.00 0.00
OAfC 100.00 7.79 21.47 45.09 2.98 16.06 6.62 0.00
OAC 100.00 6.61 31.46 37.86 12.69 11.38 0.00 0.00
(Note: In above table, the Sub groups of Others Country are given in Apendix-5).
46
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
A 2.7: Percentage Distribution of Expatriates Currently at Home by Reasons and by Division, 2016
Division
Reason
National Barisal Chittagong Dhaka Khulna Rajshahi Rangpur Sylhet
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
On leave 80.16 84.79 82.76 75.82 77.11 86.80 77.13 76.53
Sick 6.17 8.51 7.18 7.10 6.89 0.54 4.87 2.45
War 0.60 1.07 0.00 1.31 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Study completed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No work permit 1.93 3.27 0.14 4.06 0.57 4.35 4.53 0.53
Visa expired 4.97 0.31 3.33 5.55 8.69 4.74 6.93 9.39
Others 6.18 2.06 6.59 6.16 4.48 3.58 6.53 11.10
47
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
48
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
49
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
50
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
National 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Barisal 3.53 3.73 4.41 8.08 8.58 1.17 2.90 2.71 2.61 12.55
Chittago 22.12 50.55 49.81 53.05 64.04 83.06 42.94 51.27 44.45 29.29
ng
Dhaka 56.49 29.56 19.38 18.24 16.86 12.27 26.83 27.24 19.63 17.00
Khulna 6.56 5.87 7.59 7.26 0.88 0.05 8.39 9.83 17.10 2.08
Rajshahi 7.26 4.85 7.07 5.59 5.11 0.79 14.10 4.79 8.83 17.97
Rangpur 0.00 2.61 2.82 4.40 3.55 0.73 3.92 3.19 2.41 21.11
Sylhet 4.04 2.82 8.93 3.39 0.99 1.93 0.93 0.97 4.98 0.00
51
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
52
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
53
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
54
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
55
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
56
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Adelman. Irma, and J Edward Taylor, 1990, Is structural adjustment with a human face
possible? The case of Mexico., Journal of Development Studies, V.26, pp.387-407.
2. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2014, Report on Survey on the Use of Remittance (SUR)
2013, Dhaka, June 2014.
3. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2013, National Strategy for the Development of Statistics,
Dhaka, October 2013.
4. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2013, Report on Economic Census 2013, Dhaka, December
2015.
5. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2011, Household Income Expenditure Survey 2010, Dhaka.
6. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2010, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2009, Volume -1,
Dhaka June 2010.
7. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2010, Census of Agriculture 2008, National Series, Volume-
1, Dhaka, November 2010.
8. International Organization for Migration, 2002, A Study on Remittance Inflows and Utilization,
Dhaka, November 2002.
9. International Organization for Migration, 2010, The Bangladesh Household Remittance Survey
2000, Dhaka.
10. Ratha Dilip, 2005, Worker Remittances: An Important and Stable Source of External
Development Finance., In Samuel M. Maimbo and Dilip Ratha (eds), Remittances:
Development Impact and Future Prospects, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
11. Stahl, Charles W., and Fred Arnold. 1986, Overseas Workers Remittances in Asian
Development., International Migration Review 20(4): 899-925.
12. System of National Accounts 2008 (SNA 2008), UN Publication
13. World Bank data is used for all countries and years. Data access on April 24, 2016 on 11.00
A.M.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remittance#Top_recipient_countries)
14. Bureau of Manpower, Employment and Training (BMET) website. Data access on June 07,
2016 on 1.34 P.M. (http://www.bmet.org.bd/BMET/viewStatReport.action?reportnumber=20).
15. Foreign Exchange Policy Department, Bangladesh Bank. Data access on April 24, 2016 on
11.00 A.M. (https://www.bb.org.bd/econdata/wageremitance.php#)
16. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, National Accounts Statistics, (Provisional estimates of GDP,
2015-16 and Final estimates of GDP, 2014-15).
http://www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/GDP/GDP_2015-16p_final.pdf
57
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
58
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
ANNEX
59
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
60
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Indicators % Distribution
RRHH Head by Sex
Male 51.88
Female 48.12
Total 100
General Household Head by Sex
Male 84.42
Female 15.58
Total 100
Educational Status of Head of RRHH
Illiterate 33.04
I IX 52.28
SSC 8.99
HSC 3.40
Degree/Hons. 1.47
Masters 0.58
MBBS/Eng. 0.24
Total 100
RRHH by Main Source of Income
Remittance 77.89
Agriculture 14.38
Industry 0.67
Service 7.06
Total 100
RRHH by Ownership of Size of Land
Landless 1.68
0.01 - 00.49 acre 49.73
0.50 - 00.99 acre 14.88
1.00 - 02.49 acres 22.42
2.50 - 07.49 acres 9.93
7.50 + 1.36
Total 100
Age Composition of Expatriates
< 25 19.44
25 - 29 25.84
30 - 34 18.01
35 - 39 14.95
40 - 44 9.68
45 - 49 6.39
50 - 54 3.33
55 - 59 1.40
60 + 0.96
Total 100
Educational Status of Expatriates
Illiterate 9.56
I IX 61.50
SSC 16.25
HSC 7.19
Degree/Hons 2.47
Masters 0.62
MBBS/Eng. 2.41
Total 100
Expatriates by Length of Living in Abroad (year)
Less than 1 6.90
1 to less than 3 19.07
3 to less than 5 16.71
5 to less than 10 34.99
10 years & above 22.33
Total 100
61
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Indicators % Distribution
Expatriates by Occupation
Job 33.77
Business 5.95
Labour 57.28
Student 0.59
Student/ Part time job 0.19
House worker 0.93
Others 1.29
Total 100
Expatriates Received Training (at Home Country) before Going Abroad
No Training 87.82
Vocational 6.01
Language 1.79
Computer 0.38
Driving 1.59
Others 2.41
Total 100
Expatriates Currently at Home by Reasons
On leave 63.25
Sick 22.38
War 0.30
Study completed 0.27
No work permit 3.67
Visa expired 2.32
Permanently return 6.22
Others 1.59
Total 100
Remittance Receiver
Wife/ Hus./Offspring 38.81
Parents 44.63
Father/Mother in law 0.89
Brother /Sister 12.08
Others 3.59
Total 100
Expatriates by Mode of Sending Money
Western Union 6.87
MoneyGram 1.65
Post office 0.24
Bank 67.32
Friends & others 8.50
Hundi 10.04
Known person 4.23
Others 1.15
Total 100
Distribution of Income of RRHH by Sources
Remittance in Cash 75.46
Remittance in Kind 3.15
Non-Remittance Income 21.39
Total 100
Expenditure from Remittance by Category (Last One Year)
Food 38.84
Non-food 38.86
Durable & Others 22.30
Total 100
Savings Status of RRHH
Savers 56.96
Non-Savers 43.04
Total 100
62
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Indicators % Distribution
Remittance Savings by Category (Last one year)
Purchase of savings bond 5.79
Insurance 4.89
Savings account 66.07
DPS/SDPS 7.13
Permanent deposit (one year & above) 5.02
Co-operative society 0.24
Friends & others 1.07
Savings at home 9.14
Others 0.65
Total 100
RRHH by Amount of Savings (In Tk.)Last One Year)
Less than 20000 46.06
20000 - 49999 21.34
50000 - 99999 16.01
100000 - 499999 15.87
500000 + 0.72
Total 100
Investment Status of RRHH
Invest 25.32
Do not Invest 74.68
Total 100
Remittance Investment by Category (Last one year)
Own business/industry 5.05
Joint business/industry 1.69
Purchase of agriculture equipment 0.20
Purchase of share 0.36
Purchase of bond (premium/investment/wage earners development bond) 0.10
MLM 0.11
Purchase of flat 15.89
Commercial building 1.26
Dwelling house construction 72.05
Others 3.29
Total 100
RRHH by Size of Investment from Remittance (Last One Year)
Less than 20000 18.16
2000049999 12.46
5000099999 19.28
100000499999 36.21
500000 + 13.89
Total 100
Expenditure as the percentage of Income from Remittance by Category
Food 32.81
Non-food Items 32.82
Durable & Others 18.84
Total 84.47
Investment and Savings as the Percentage of Income from Remittance
Investment 33.45
Savings 13.74
63
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
64
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
65
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
from each Upazila was taken into account as the list frame, and 1433 PSUs of IMPS design were
considered as the area frame. The list of RRHH-dominant 5 villages was done by field officials of
BBS during 26 April to 10 May 2013 assuming that field officials are better informed about the
village status in terms of any issue as they are deeply involved in statistical activities at those villages.
During listing 588 staff members of BBS were engaged in collecting the information whether the
household was remittance receiver or not. Names of household heads and addresses were recorded in
the list.
Out of RRHH-dominant 2320 villages, 400 were selected as the sample by PPES. Probability
Proportional to Estimated Size (PPES) is a sampling technique in which the probability of selecting a
sampling unit such as village is proportional to the size of its estimated population (RRHHs). It gives
a representative sample. It becomes very useful when the sampling units vary considerably in size
because it ensures equal probability for large and small units to be selected. A quick count was made
in all the RRHH-dominant 2320 villages to identify the number of RRHHs. As the aim was to provide
estimates at division level, the samples (400 RRHH-dominant villages) were reasonably allocated by
division proportionally. Table 2.1shows the sampling distribution by division.
At first, the total number of RRHHs was derived by a quick head count by division. Then, the
Sampling Interval (SI) for each division was calculated by dividing the total number of RRHHs of
each division by the respective sample size (number of villages). The procedure is also portrayed in
66
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Col-6 of table 2.1. Then, a Random Number (RN) between 1 and the SI for each division was
generated by computer. After that, the following formula:
RS (Random Sample); RN + SI; RN + 2SI was independently applied to select the sample
villages under each division. RS means the first sample village corresponding to first RN; RN+SI
means the second sample village identified by adding the SI with RN; RN+2SI means the third sample
village selected by adding RN with SI multiplying by 2 and this formula had been continued
additively until the last sample village of the respective division was selected. This method was
separately applied for each division to select the sample villages of the respective division.
67
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
68
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Preparing a comprehensive manual of data collection with clearly defied concepts and
definitions;
Conducting rigorous training programme for the enumerators and supervisors;
Deploying sufficient number of enumerators in order to ensure smooth data collection;
Taking extra measure in data collection activity by engaging sufficient number of
supervisors.
3.2.1 Questionnaire Design:
Along with sampling, the questions asked to a respondent are equally important to collect the desired
information. The questionnaire was designed and finalized on the basis of experts opinion collected
through formal and informal consultation.
69
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
meaning and clarity which yields the intended information from the respondent, was taken care of.
Furthermore, the enumerators manual was also modified accordingly.
70
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Data entry
Appending and merging files
Data validation (further checking, editing, and imputation)
Final decision on errors
Completion of data processing and generation of data files
Final documentations
Conversion of data files to another software.
Storage of all files
i. Data Entry
After completion of editing, a group of experienced BBS staffs carried out the task of data entry
following the steps mentioned below:
a) Designing Data Entry Application: Data entry template was developed by using CSPro
software. A strong data dictionary based on the questionnaire was created during the preparation of
template. The data dictionary contained unique ID and values of the items to be entered. To avoid
errors of inconsistencies, a logical check was also maintained throughout the data entry. The template
was reviewed for convenience and eventually finalized for use.
b) Data Capturing and Preliminary Validation: Data were captured in computer as soon as
the data editing was completed. A variety of common errors were identified during data capturing. As
a result, observing the error messages, data were cross checked with questionnaire. In addition to that,
following procedures were followed for data cleaning and primary validation:
Wrong data and out of range codes: As the code was given during the preparation of
questionnaire, naturally, it restricted the enumerator to a set of codes within the
acceptable range for most of the questions. Moreover, the values were set during the
preparation of data entry screen for avoiding wild codes for most of the questions.
Inconsistency checking: To avoid errors, omissions and inconsistencies, this
mechanism was also developed during the data entry program designing.
Treatment of Missing values: The data entry program was designed not to allow blanks
that ensure not having missing values in the data.
Incomplete records and dropped cases. The data entry program was designed to accept
the complete data case; otherwise, it would not be saved. This was set to avoid
incomplete records and dropped cases.
Duplication of entries. The data entry program was designed in view of rejecting
duplication of entries based on the identifiers.
71
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Validation was accomplished after appending and merging files by checking the number of variables,
the cases, wild codes, missing values and consistencies. It was also checked whether the number of
variables generated was matched with the number of variables in the data set.
After completion of the entire process, data were stored in ASCII format. In order to have the print
out, the data were also been converted to Microsoft Excel Format. Both original and new formats were
preserved. Finally, a copy of the data set put forward to the survey authority for tabulation and
analysis. The questionnaires were also preserved in the safe storage of BBS under the guidance of
survey team for future reference.
Four software named CSPro, STATA, SPSS and Excel were used for processing the survey data.
CSPro was used for data entry and editing, STATA and SPSS for both tabulation and data analysis,
and Excel for converting the STATA or SPSS files to table format.
3.2.5 Tabulation
A tabulation plan was designed by the survey team, which was shared with the working committee for
their opinion. The working committee suggested some modifications which were subsequently
incorporated. A total of 94 tables focusing on the major issues relating to the social, demography and
economic aspects of the study population were generated. Drafting statistical tables along with data,
these were presented before some important stakeholders in order to know whether these tables
fulfilled their demand or they had more requirements. They provided some valuable suggestions those
were incorporated afterward. Eventually, these tables were finalized and furnished in the report as the
part of the analysis as well as statistical tables.
72
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
The final report was disseminated both in electronic form such as CD and hard copy as book. Results
are available in the website of BBS. Some data may also be published in other publications of BBS
such as Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh, National Accounts Statistics and Monthly Statistical
Bulletin etc.
73
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
74
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
75
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
76
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
77
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
78
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
List of Villages
Sl Division District Upazila Union
1 Barisal Barguna Bamna Bukabunia
2 Barisal Barguna Betagi Bibichini
3 Barisal Barisal Agailjhara Rajiher
4 Barisal Barisal Babuganj Kedarpur
5 Barisal Barisal Babuganj Kedarpur
6 Barisal Barisal Banari Para Chakhar
7 Barisal Barisal Gaurnadi Mahilara
8 Barisal Barisal Barisal Sadar (Kotwali) Kashipur
9 Barisal Barisal Mhendiganj Char Ekkaria
10 Barisal Barisal Mhendiganj Ulania
11 Barisal Barisal Muladi Muladi
12 Barisal Barisal Muladi Muladi
13 Barisal Barisal Muladi Nazirpur
14 Barisal Barisal Wazirpur Sholak
15 Barisal Bhola Bhola Sadar Illisha
16 Barisal Bhola Burhanuddin Tabgi
17 Barisal Bhola Lalmohan Lord Hardinje
18 Barisal Bhola Tazumuddin Chanchra
19 Barisal Bhola Tazumuddin Chandpur
20 Barisal Jhalokati Jhalokati Sadar Nabagram
21 Barisal Jhalokati Kanthalia Chenchri Rampur
22 Barisal Jhalokati Nalchity Subidpur
23 Barisal Jhalokati Rajapur Mathbari
24 Barisal Jhalokati Rajapur Mathbari
25 Barisal Patuakhali Dashmina Alipur
26 Barisal Patuakhali Galachipa Kalyankalas
27 Barisal Patuakhali Patuakhali Sadar Chhota Bighai
28 Barisal Pirojpur Bhandaria Telikhali
29 Barisal Pirojpur Bhandaria Telikhali
30 Barisal Pirojpur Kawkhali Kawkhali
31 Barisal Pirojpur Mathbaria Gulishakhali
32 Barisal Pirojpur Nazirpur Upazila Malikhali
33 Barisal Pirojpur Pirojpur Sadar Shankarpasha
34 Barisal Pirojpur Zianagar Pattashi
35 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Akhaura Ward No-01
36 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Akhaura Dharkhar
37 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Banchharampur Saifullakandi
38 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Banchharampur Darikandi (Purba Saifullakandi)
39 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Ashuganj Araisidha
40 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Ashuganj Paschim Talsahar
41 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Kasba Kaimpur
42 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Nabinagar Ibrahimpur
43 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Nasirnagar Nasirnagar
44 Chittagong Brahmanbaria Sarail Sarail
45 Chittagong Chandpur Faridganj Paschim Baluthupa
79
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
80
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
81
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
82
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
83
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
84
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
85
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
86
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
87
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
88
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
89
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
90
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
91
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
92
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
93
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
94
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
95
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
96
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
97
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
98
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
99
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
100
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
Report Reviewer
1. Mr. Durga Pada Bhattacharjee Deputy Secretary (Retd.)
2. Mr. Mahmudul Hoque Deputy Secretary (Rtd.)
Special Contributor
1. Mr. Md. Rezaul Karim Assistant Statistical Officer
101
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
102
Report of the Survey on Investment from Remittance 2016
103