Angular Momentum University of Notre Dame
Angular Momentum University of Notre Dame
Angular Momentum University of Notre Dame
Angular Momentum
L = r p.
1
2 CHAPTER 1. ANGULAR MOMENTUM
one easily establishes the following commutation relations for the Cartesian
components of the quantum mechanical angular momentum operator:
Lx Ly Ly Lx = ihLz , Ly Lz Lz Ly = ihLx , Lz Lx Lx Lz = ihLy .
(1.3)
Since the components of L do not commute with each other, it is not possible to
find simultaneous eigenstates of any two of these three operators. The operator
L2 = L2x + L2y + L2z , however, commutes with each component of L. It is, there-
fore, possible to find a simultaneous eigenstate of L2 and any one component of
L. It is conventional to seek eigenstates of L2 and Lz .
. Moreover, with the aid of Eq.(1.7), one can establish that J+ |, mi and
J |, mi are eigenstates of Jz with eigenvalues m 1, respectively:
Jz J+ |, mi = (m + 1) J+ |, mi, (1.12)
Jz J |, mi = (m 1) J |, mi. (1.13)
1.1. ORBITAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM - SPHERICAL HARMONICS 3
Since J+ raises the eigenvalue m by one unit, and J lowers it by one unit,
these operators are referred to as raising and lowering operators, respectively.
Furthermore, since Jx2 + Jy2 is a positive definite hermitian operator, it follows
that
m2 .
By repeated application of J to eigenstates of Jz , one can obtain states of ar-
bitrarily small eigenvalue m, violating this bound, unless for some state |, m1 i,
J |, m1 i = 0.
Similarly, repeated application of J+ leads to arbitrarily large values of m, unless
for some state |, m2 i
J+ |, m2 i = 0.
Since m2 is bounded, we infer the existence of the two states |, m1 i and |, m2 i.
Starting from the state |, m1 i and applying the operator J+ repeatedly, one
must eventually reach the state |, m2 i; otherwise the value of m would increase
indefinitely. It follows that
m2 m1 = k, (1.14)
where k 0 is the number of times that J+ must be applied to the state |, m1 i
in order to reach the state |, m2 i. One finds from Eqs.(1.8,1.9) that
|, m1 i = (m21 m1 )|, m1 i,
|, m2 i = (m22 + m2 )|, m2 i,
leading to the identities
= m21 m1 = m22 + m2 , (1.15)
which can be rewritten
(m2 m1 + 1)(m2 + m1 ) = 0. (1.16)
Since the first term on the left of Eq.(1.16) is positive definite, it follows that
m1 = m2 . The upper bound m2 can be rewritten in terms of the integer k in
Eq.(1.14) as
m2 = k/2 = j.
The value of j is either integer or half integer, depending on whether k is even
or odd:
1 3
j = 0, , 1, , .
2 2
It follows from Eq.(1.15) that the eigenvalue of J 2 is
= j(j + 1). (1.17)
The number of possible m eigenvalues for a given value of j is k + 1 = 2j + 1.
The possible values of m are
m = j, j 1, j 2, , j.
4 CHAPTER 1. ANGULAR MOMENTUM
Since J = J+ , it follows that
J+ |, mi = |, m + 1i, J |, m + 1i = |, mi.
is
1
m () = eim , (1.27)
2
where m is an integer. The eigenvalue equation L2 Yl,m (, ) = h2 l(l +
1)Yl,m (, ) leads to the differential equation
1 d d m2
sin + l(l + 1) l,m () = 0 , (1.28)
sin d d sin2
for the function l,m (). The orbital angular momentum quantum number l
must be an integer since m is an integer.
One can generate solutions to Eq.(1.28) by recurrence, starting with the
solution for m = l and stepping forward in m using the raising operator L+ ,
or starting with the solution for m = l and stepping backward using the lowering
operator L . The function l,l () satisfies the differential equation
d
L l,l ()l () = hl+1 () + l cot l,l () = 0 ,
d
one obtains r
1 (2l + 1)!
l,l () = l sinl . (1.30)
2 l! 2
l+m
Applying L+ to Yl,l (, ), leads to the result
s
(1)l+m (2l + 1)(l m)! m dl+m
l,m () = sin sin2l . (1.31)
2l l! 2(l + m)! d cos l+m
1 dl 2
Pl (x) = (x 1)l . (1.34)
2l l! dxl
For m = l, Eq.(1.31) gives
r
(1)l (2l + 1)!
l,l () = l sinl . (1.35)
2 l! 2
Starting with this equation and stepping backward l m times leads to an
alternate expression for l,m ():
s
(1)l (2l + 1)(l + m)! dlm
l,m () = l sinm sin2l . (1.36)
2 l! 2(l m)! d cos lm
We can restrict our attention to l,m () with m 0 and use (1.37) to obtain
l,m () for m < 0. For positive values of m, Eq.(1.31) can be written
s
(2l + 1)(l m)! m
l,m () = (1)m Pl (cos ) , (1.38)
2(l + m)!
where Plm (x) is an associated Legendre functions of the first kind, given in
Abramowitz and Stegun (1964, chap. 8), with a different sign convention, defined
by
dm
Plm (x) = (1 x2 )m/2 m Pl (x) . (1.39)
dx
1.2. SPIN ANGULAR MOMENTUM 7
The general orthonormality relations hl, m|l0 , m0 i = ll0 mm0 for angular mo-
mentum eigenstates takes the specific form
Z Z 2
sin dd Yl,m (, )Yl0 ,m0 (, ) = ll0 mm0 , (1.40)
0 0
for spherical harmonics. Comparing Eq.(1.31) and Eq.(1.36) leads to the relation
q
1
Y00 = 4
q q
Y10 = 3
4 cos Y1,1 = 8
3
sin ei
q q
Y20 = 5
16 (3 cos2 1) Y2,1 = 8
15
sin cos ei
q
Y2,2 = 3215
sin2 e2i
q q
7
Y30 = 16 cos (5 cos2 3) Y3,1 = 64
21
sin (5 cos2 1) ei
q q
105
Y3,2 = 32 cos sin2 e2i Y3,3 = 64
35
sin3 e3i
= . (1.43)
S 2 = 34 h2 , Sz = h .
8 CHAPTER 1. ANGULAR MOMENTUM
One can use Eqs.(1.18,1.19) to work out the elements of the matrices represent-
ing the spin raising and lowering operators S :
0 1 0 0
S+ = h , S = h .
0 0 1 0
x2 = I, y2 = I, z2 = I, (1.46)
y x = x y , z y = y z , x z = z x . (1.47)
The Pauli matrices also satisfy commutation relations that follow from the gen-
eral angular momentum commutation relations (1.4):
x y = iz , y z = ix , z x = iy . (1.49)
From the above equations for the Pauli matrices, one can show
a b = a b + i [a b], (1.50)
x0 = x + y,
y0 = x + y,
z0 = z,
With the aid of this matrix, one can rewrite the equations for A in the form
A(x, y, z) = i Jz A(x, y, z), where Jz = Lz + sz . If we define angular
momentum to be the generator of infinitesimal rotations, then the z component
10 CHAPTER 1. ANGULAR MOMENTUM
The matrices s = (sx , sy , sz ) are referred to as the spin matrices. In the following
paragraphs, we show that these matrices are associated with angular momentum
quantum number s = 1.
= .
X
1
v = v , where
=1
v = v .
Using these relations, one may show, for example, that the unit vector r ex-
pressed in the spherical basis is
r
4 X
1
r = Y (, ) . (1.56)
3 =1 1,
Since the states |j1 , m1 i |j2 , m2 i are linearly independent, one concludes from
Eq.(1.58) that
(m1 + m2 m)C(j1 , j2 , j; m1 , m2 , m) = 0 . (1.59)
It follows that the only nonvanishing Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are those for
which m1 +m2 = m. The sum in Eq.(1.57) can be expressed, therefore, as a sum
over m2 only, the value of m1 being determined by m1 = mm2 . Consequently,
we rewrite Eq.(1.57) as
X
|j, mi = C(j1 , j2 , j; m m2 , m2 , m)|j1 , m m2 i |j2 , m2 i . (1.60)
m2
One can make use of this equation to invert Eq.(1.60). Indeed, one finds
X
|j1 , m m2 i|j2 , m2 i = C(j1 , j2 , j; m m2 , m2 , m)|j, mi . (1.62)
j
The state of largest m is the extended state |j1 , j1 i |j2 , j2 i. With the aid
of the decomposition, J 2 = J12 + J22 + 2J1z J2z + J1+ J2 + J1 J2+ , one may
establish that this state is an eigenstate of J 2 with eigenvalue j = j1 + j2 ; it
is also, obviously, an eigenstate of Jz with eigenvalue m = j1 + j2 . The state
J |j1 , j1 i |j2 , j2 i is also an eigenstate of J 2 with eigenvalue j = j1 + j2 . It is
an eigenstate of Jz but with eigenvalue m = j1 + j2 1. The corresponding
normalized eigenstate is
s
j1
|j1 + j2 , j1 + j2 1i = |j1 , j1 1i|j2 , j2 i
j1 + j2
s
j2
+ |j1 , j1 i|j2 , j2 1i . (1.64)
j1 + j2
1.3. CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS 13
ms = 1/2 ms = 1/2
q q
l+m+1/2 lm+1/2
j = l + 1/2 2l+1 2l+1
q q
j = l 1/2 lm+1/2
2l+1
l+m+1/2
2l+1
jX
1 +j2
which leads to the jmin = |j1 j2 |. The possible eigenvalues of J 2 are, therefore,
given by j(j + 1), with j = j1 + j2 , j1 + j2 1, , |j1 j2 |.
Values of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients can be determined from the con-
struction described above; however, it is often easier to proceed in a slightly
different way. Let us illustrate the alternative for the case J = L + S, with
s = 1/2. In this case, the possible values j are j = l + 1/2 and j = l 1/2.
Eigenstates of J 2 and Jz constructed by the Clebsch-Gordan expansion are also
eigenstates of
= 2L S = 2Lz Sz + L+ S + L S+ .
14 CHAPTER 1. ANGULAR MOMENTUM
ms = 1 ms = 0 ms = 1
q q q
(l+m)(l+m+1) (lm+1)(l+m+1) (lm)(lm+1)
j =l+1 (2l+1)(2l+2) (2l+1)(l+1) (2l+1)(2l+2)
q q
j=l (l+m)(lm+1)
2l(l+1)
m (lm)(l+m+1)
2l(l+1)
l(l+1)
q q q
(lm)(lm+1) (lm)(l+m) (l+m+1)(l+m)
j =l1 2l(2l+1) l(2l+1) 2l(2l+1)
|j, mi = |j, mi
Racah (1942):
q
(j1 +j2 j)!(j+j1 j2 )!(j+j2 j1 )!(2j+1)
C(j1 , j2 , j; m1 , m2 , m) = m1 +m2 ,m (j+j1 +j2 +1)!
P (1)k (j1 +m1 )!(j1 m1 )!(j2 +m2 )!(j2 m2 )!(j+m)!(jm)!
k k!(j1 +j2 jk)!(j1 m1 k)!(j2 +m2 k)!(jj2 +m1 +k)!(jj1 m2 +k)! .
With the aid of this formula, the following symmetry relations between Clebsch-
Gordan coefficients (see Rose, 1957, chap. 3) may be established:
C(j1 , j2 , j; m1 , m2 , m) = (1)j1 +j2 j C(j1 , j2 , j; m1 , m2 , m) , (1.69)
j1 +j2 j
C(j2 , j1 , j; m2 , m1 , m) = (1) C(j1 , j2 , j; m1 , m2 , m) , (1.70)
C(j1 , j, j2 ; m1 , m, m2 ) =
s
j1 m1 2j2 + 1
(1) C(j1 , j2 , j; m1 , m2 , m) . (1.71)
2j + 1
Expressions for other permutations of the arguments can be inferred from these
basic three. As an application of these symmetry relations, we combine the
easily derived equation
C(j1 , 0, j; m1 , 0, m) = j1 j m1 m , (1.72)
with Eq.(1.71) to give
(1)j1 m1
C(j1 , j, 0; m1 , m, 0) = j j m1 m . (1.73)
2j + 1 1
Several other useful formulas may also be derived directly from Eq. (1.68):
C(j1 , j2 , j1 + j2 ; m1 , m2 , m1 + m2 ) =
s
(2j1 )!(2j2 )!(j1 + j2 + m1 + m2 )!(j1 + j2 m1 m2 )!
, (1.74)
(2j1 + 2j2 )!(j1 m1 )!(j1 + m1 )!(j2 m2 )!(j2 + m2 )!
C(j1 , j2 , j; j1 , m j1 , m) =
s
(2j + 1)(2j1 )!(j2 j1 + j)!(j1 + j2 m)!(j + m)!
. (1.75)
(j1 + j2 j)!(j1 j2 + j)!(j1 + j2 + j + 1)!(j2 j1 + m)!(j m)!
j1 j2 j3
= (1)j2 +j3 +m3
m1 j1 m3 m3
s
(2j1 )!(j2 j1 + j3 )!(j1 + j2 + m3 )!(j3 m3 )!
.
(j1 + j2 + j3 + 1)!(j1 j2 + j3 )!(j1 + j2 j3 )!(j2 j1 m3 )!(j3 + m3 )!
(1.85)
J = Jz , = 0, (1.89)
1
2
(Jx iJy ), = 1,
In this equation, the quantity hj1 ||T k ||j2 i, called the reduced matrix element of
the tensor operator T k , is independent of the magnetic quantum numbers m1 ,
m2 and q.
To prove the Wigner-Eckart theorem, we note that the matrix elements
hj1 m1 |Tqk |j2 m2 i satisfies the recurrence relations
p
(j1 m1 + 1)(j1 m1 ) hj1 m1 1|Tqk |j2 m2 i =
p
(j2 m2 + 1)(j2 m2 ) hj1 m1 |Tqk |j2 m2 1i
p k
+ (k q + 1)(k q) hj1 m1 |Tq1 |j2 m2 i . (1.91)
18 CHAPTER 1. ANGULAR MOMENTUM
The reduced matrix element hj1 ||J||j2 i can be determined by evaluating both
sides of Eq.(1.93) in the special case = 0. We find
p
hj1 ||J||j2 i = j1 (j1 + 1)(2j1 + 1) j1 j2 , (1.94)
The left-hand side of Eq.(1.96) is (up to a factor) the integral of three spherical
harmonics. It follows that
r
X 2k + 1
Ykq ()Yl2 m2 () =
4
l1
l1 m1 l1 k l2
(1) hl1 ||C k ||l2 i Yl1 m1 () , (1.97)
m1 q m2
where we use the symbol to designate the angles and . With the aid of
the orthogonality relation (1.81) for the three-j symbols, we invert Eq.(1.97) to
find
X l1 k l2
Ykq () Yl2 m2 () =
m1 q m2
m2 q
r
2k + 1 (1)l1 m1
hl1 ||C k ||l2 iYl1 m1 () . (1.98)
4 2l1 + 1
1.4. GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION - BASIC RULES 19
It follows that two arrows directed in the same direction give an overall phase,
j1 m1
j2 m2 =
j1 m1
-
- j2 m2
= (1)2j2 j1 j2 m1 m2 , (1.104)
The + sign designates that the lines associated with j1 m1 , j2 m2 , and j3 m3 are
oriented in such a way that a counter-clockwise rotation leads from j1 m1 to
j2 m2 to j3 m3 . We use a sign to designate that a clockwise rotation leads
from j1 m1 to j2 m2 to j3 m3 . Thus, we can rewrite Eq.(1.106) as
j1 m1
j1 j2 j3 j2 m2
= . (1.107)
m1 m2 m3
j3 m3
+ j2 m2 = + j1 m1 = + j3 m3 . (1.108)
j1 m1 j3 m3 j2 m2
One can attach directed lines and three-j symbols to form combinations such
as j1 m1
+
6 j3 m3 = (1) j1 m1 j1 j2 j3
. (1.110)
m1 m2 m3
j2 m2
The orthogonality relation for three-j symbols (1.81) can be written in graph-
ical terms as
j1 m1 j1 m1
j1
X
j30 m03 j3 m3
def j30 m03 j3 m3 1
+ =
= j j 0 m m0 .
m1 m2
+ 2j3 + 1 3 3 3 3
j2 m2 j2 m2 j2
(1.114)
Another very useful graphical identity is
j2 m2
s
6J 2j3 + 1
+
?= j1 j2 m1 m2 J0 (1.115)
2j1 + 1
j1 m1 j3
From Table 1.1, we obtain the following explicit formulas for spherical spinors
having the two possible values, j = l 1/2:
q
l+m+1/2
Yl,m1/2 (, )
l+1/2,l,m (, ) = q 2l+1 , (1.117)
lm+1/2
2l+1 Y l,m+1/2 (, )
q
lm+1/2 Yl,m1/2 (, )
l1/2,l,m (, ) = q 2l+1 . (1.118)
l+m+1/2
2l+1 Y l,m+1/2 (, )
K = 1 L.
r r = 1 , (1.122)
which follows from the commutation relations for the Pauli matrices. Further-
more, the operator r commutes with J and, therefore, leaves the value of j
unchanged. The parity operation changes the sign of r. Since the value of j
remains unchanged, and since the sign of r changes under the parity transfor-
mation, it follows that
r m (, ) = am (, ) , (1.123)
r m (, ) = m (, ) . (1.124)
This identities (1.124) and (1.126) are important in the reduction of the central-
field Dirac equation to radial form.
1.5. SPINOR AND VECTOR SPHERICAL HARMONICS 23
With the aid of the orthogonality relation, this equation can be inverted to give
Z 2 Z
aJLM = d sin d YJLM r Ylm (, ).
0 0
Using the known expression for the matrix element of the C1 tensor operator
from Eqs.(1.96,1.99), one obtains
r
2L + 1
aJLM = C(L, 1, l; 0, 0, 0) Jl M m (1.131)
2l + 1
r r !
l l+1
= Ll1 Ll+1 Jl M m . (1.132)
2l + 1 2l + 1
The first of these is just a definition; we leave the proof of the other two as
exercises.
Bibliography
25