0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views

Mathematical Analysis - Exercises: Felipe Guerra November 29, 2017

Topologias Débiles

Uploaded by

Felipe Guerra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views

Mathematical Analysis - Exercises: Felipe Guerra November 29, 2017

Topologias Débiles

Uploaded by

Felipe Guerra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Mathematical Analysis - Exercises

Felipe Guerra

November 29, 2017


In the context of the following exercise we equip X with the topology that is the weakest
topology associated to the collection {i }iI , where i : X Yi and {i }iI are a family of
topological spaces.
Exercise 1. Let Z be a topological space and let be a map from Z into X , then the next
sentences are equivalent:
i) is continuous.
ii) For all i I , i is a continuous map.
Proof. First suppose that is continuous, then i is the composition of continuous functions.
After that, suppose that i is continuous, for all i I , and let A be an open set in X , in
that case A can be written like: [\
A= 1
j (wj ) ,
iI jFi

where wj is an open set in Yi and Fj I nite. Then


!
[\ [\  [\
1 (A) = 1 1
j (wj ) = 1 1
j (w j ) = ( )1 (wj ) ,
iI jFi iI jFi iI jFi

which is open in Z since every map i is continuous.


Exercise 2. Let (X, ) be a topological space where X is compact. Show that

X 1
d (x, y) = |fn (x) fn (y) | , (x, y) X X ,
n=1
2n

denes a metric over X , where {fn }nN are continuous functions that separate points.
Proof. The meaning of a family of functions that separate points is:

x 6= y n0 N , fn0 (x) 6= fn0 (y) .

Let x, z , y X then:
i) Notice that, d (x, y) 0, for all x, y X , because each term of the series is no negative.
ii) If x = y . It's known that fn is a function that separate points, for all n N, thus

fn (x) = fn (y) |fn (x) fn (y) | = 0 , n N ,

which implies d (x, y) = 0. Conversely, if d (x, y) = 0, suppose x 6= y . As



X 1
|f (x) fn (y) | = 0 ,
n n
n=1
2

after i), each term of the series is no negative and the series converge to zero, which means
1
|f
2n n
(x) fn (y) | = 0 fn (x) = fn (y) , n N .

But {fn }nN separate points, thus x = y .

1
iii) The symmetry is done in view of the symmetry of absolute value, indeed

X 1 X 1
d (x, y) = n
|fn (x) fn (y) | = |fn (y) fn (x) | = d (y, x) .
n=1
2 n=1
2n

iv) Consider:
m
1
where when
X
Sn = |f (x) fn (z) | ,
n n
Sn d (x, z) , m + .
n=1
2

Then
m
X 1
Sn = |fn (x) fn (z) | ,
n=1
2n
m
X 1
= |fn (x) fn (y) + fn (y) fn (z) | ,
n=1
2n
m
X 1h i
n
|f n (x) f n (y) | + |f n (y) f n (z) | ,
n=1
2
m m
X 1 X 1
= n
|fn (x) fn (y) | + |fn (y) fn (z) | ,
n=1
2 n=1
2n

thus, making m +, the result is d (x, z) d (x, y) + d (y, z).

Exercise 3. Let (X, d) be a metric space such X is complete, precompact and sequentially
compact. Then X is compact.
Proof. Let {Oi }iI be an open set collection in (X, d) such cover X . Before proving the state-
ment we shall prove the following auxiliary result.
Claim 1: Exist > 0, such for all x X , exist i I where B (x, ) Oi .

Proof. Proceeding by absurd, suppose


x X , x X , B (x, ) 6 Oi , i I .
Thus, for
= 1 , x1 X , B (x, 1) 6 Oi , i I ,
then take  
1 1
= , x2 X , B x, 6 Oi , i I .
2 2
Inductively, it can dene a sequence (xn )n1 in X , suchlike
 
1
B xn , 6 Oi , i I .

n
As X is sequentially compact, exist a sub sequence (xnk )k1 convergent to x in X , i.e.
xnk x. Furthermore, exist i I , where x Oi - since {Oi }iI is a covering of X -
even more x is a interior point, i.e., exist r > 0, such B (x, r) Oi . By the denition
of convergence, to K N, large enough, for all k K , xnk lie in B (x, r) which means
xnk Oi , contradiction because (xn )n1 6 Oi , for all i I , much less the sub sequence
(xnk )k1 .

2
After that, suppose X is precompact, then exists {y1 , ..., yn } such
n
[
X= B (yp , ) .
p=1

By the claim, for all yp E , exist ip I , where B (yp , ) Oip , implying


n
[
X Oip .
p=1

That prove X is compact.


Exercise 4. Let E be a Banach space, the the canonical injection
J : (E, (E, E 0 )) (E 00 , (E 00 , E 0 ))
is an isomorphism from E , equipped with the weak topology (E, E 0 ), to J (E), equipped with
the weak* topology (E 00 , E 0 ).
Proof. It's suces to show J and J 1 are continuous on each topology associate, since J is
bijective on J (E). Remind, the weak topology, (E, E 0 ), makes all the maps g : E R
continuous, and the weak* topology, (E 00 , E 0 ), makes all the maps
g : E 00 R
7 h, giE 00 ,E 0 ,
continuous, for all g E 0 . Besides, J has the property hJx , giE 00 ,E 0 = hg, xiE 0 ,E .
Moreover, if x E and g E 0 , then we have
(g J) (x) = hJx , giE 00 ,E 0 = hg, xiE 0 ,E = g (x) ,
i.e, (g J g) (x) = 0, from where g J = g . Since g is continuous then g J es continuous,
using Exercise 1 we can deduce J is continuous from weak topology, (E, E 0 ), over E to weak*
topology, (E 00 , E 0 ), over E 00 .
Conversely, g = g J 1 as the same reasoning as before g J 1 is continuous since g
is continuous by denition of weak* topology and using Exercise 1, i.e., J 1 is continuous
from weak* topology, (E 00 , E 0 ), over E 00 to weak topology, (E, E 0 ), over E . Thus J is an
isomorphism from E to J (E) with de weak and weak* topologies respectively.
Exercise 5. Let E be a Banach space. Then E is reexive if and only if E 0 is reexive.
Proof. We need an auxiliary result, which the following is:
Claim 2: Let E , F be Banach spaces and suppose that exists : E F an isomor-
phism from E to F . Then E is reexive if only if F is reexive.

Proof. Indeed, as is bijective bounded linear operator then : F E - the adjoint


0 0

operator - is well dened, moreover is bijective bounded linear operator. Proceeding


as before : E F is bijective bounded linear operator.
00 00

Using this, the following diagram commutes:



E - F

JE JF
? ?
00 00
E
-
F

3
If E is reexive, then JF = JE 1 , since , JE and 1 are surjective then
JF (F ) = F which implies F is reexive. As the same did as before, if F is reexive,
then JE = ( )1 JF , i.e., E is reexive.

First, suppose E is reexive and notice that weak and weak* topologies coincide, just because
h, f iE 00 ,E 0 = hf, yiE 0 ,E is fullled, i.e, in E 00 has a representative y on E . By the Banach-
Alaoglu theorem B E 0 = {f E 0 : kf k 1} is compact to the weak* topology, (E 0 , E),
furthermore B E 0 is compact to weak topology, (E 0 , E 00 ), since both coincide. By Kakutani
theorem E 0 is reexive.
Conversely, suppose E is reexive. By the previously proof E is reexive, notice that J (E)
0 00

is a sub space closed of E , J (E) is a Banach space reexive. Using the isomorphism isometric,
00

J 1 : J (E) E , given by the canonical injection and the claim 2, E is reexive.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy