Scribd
Upload
31 views

5.1 Project Assessment Criteria: Criterion Level of Response Mark Range Maximum Mark

The document outlines the criteria and levels of response for assessing a design and technology project. It includes 7 criteria: 1) identification of a need and design brief, 2) research and specification, 3) generation of design ideas, 4) development of a proposed solution, 5) planning for production, 6) product realization, and 7) testing and evaluation. For each criterion there are 3 levels of response - limited, satisfactory, and comprehensive - with corresponding mark ranges from 1 to varying maximum marks.

Uploaded by

suriavelloo
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views

5.1 Project Assessment Criteria: Criterion Level of Response Mark Range Maximum Mark

The document outlines the criteria and levels of response for assessing a design and technology project. It includes 7 criteria: 1) identification of a need and design brief, 2) research and specification, 3) generation of design ideas, 4) development of a proposed solution, 5) planning for production, 6) product realization, and 7) testing and evaluation. For each criterion there are 3 levels of response - limited, satisfactory, and comprehensive - with corresponding mark ranges from 1 to varying maximum marks.

Uploaded by

suriavelloo
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

5.

1 Project assessment criteria


Criterion Level of response Mark
range
Maximum
mark
1. Identification of a
need or opportunity
with a brief analysis
leading to a design
brief
A statement of what is to be made.
Consideration of the design need or the intended
user(s) leading to a design brief.
Consideration of both the design need and the
intended user(s) leading to a clear design brief.
1
2–3
4–5
5
2. Research into
the design brief
resulting in a
specification
Limited examination of the design brief with a
specification identifying some basic requirements.
Meaningful research of the design brief with
some data identified. A specification including
key features of the intended product.
Thorough research of the design brief with
relevant data identified and collected. Analysis of
the research leading to a detailed specification for
the intended product.
1–3
4–7
8–10
10
3. Generation and
exploration of
design ideas
A limited range of ideas with a tendency to focus
on a single concept. Little or no evaluation of
ideas.
A range of appropriate solutions proposed.
Ideas examined with evaluations leading to the
identification of possible ideas for development.
A wide range of appropriate solutions with
imaginative interpretation. Detailed evaluation of
ideas and consideration of the requirements of
the specification.
1–7
8–13
14–20
20
4. Development of
proposed solution
Some decisions made about form, materials and/
or construction methods.
As a result of investigation, appropriate decisions
made about form, materials and construction/
production methods. Evidence of some testing
and/or trialling.
Appropriate testing and trialling resulting in
reasoned decisions about form, materials,
construction/production methods and other items.
1–5
6–10
11–15
15
26
Cambridge IGCSE Design and Technology 0445. Examination in June and November 2012.

5. Project assessment
Criterion Level of response Mark
range
Maximum
mark
5. Planning for
production
Limited evidence of any forethought. A working
drawing with little detail.
A simple plan showing awareness of the main
processes involved. A clear working drawing
showing overall layout and major dimensions.
Clear and detailed planning showing an effective
order for the sequence of operations. Drawings
and other information give full details of the final
product.
1–3
4–6
7–10
10
6. Product realisation The product will exhibit a reasonable standard of
outcome, be mainly complete and satisfy some
aspects of the specification.
The product may have some minor inaccuracies
and blemishes but will be complete and function
as intended.
The product will be completed to a high standard
of outcome with precision and accuracy. It
will meet fully the requirements of the product
specification.
1–10
11–20
21–30
30
7. Testing and
evaluation
Little or no evidence of testing. General overall
appraisal with little reference to the specification.
Appropriate reporting and/or comment on simple
testing. Reference to the specification with some
conclusions leading to possible modifications or
improvements.
Objective testing with reference to the
specification and user. Detailed and meaningful
conclusions leading

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy