Munoz Gas Station
Munoz Gas Station
Munoz Gas Station
claiming that the latter misinterpreted the Revised Zoning Ordinance in stating that
their proposed project is not one of the allowable business under the zoning
ordinance of the City of San Jose del Monte. They claim that they have complied
with all the conditions for the proposed gasoline station. It was further claimed that
the opposition by certain residents on safety issues in relation to the operation of the
gasoline station were more imagined than real.
We shall resolve the sole issue in this appeal by first examining the contents
and relevant provisions of the current Zoning Ordinance No. 2016-84-04 of the City
of San Jose del Monte, Bulacan which the Sangguniang Panlungsod has adopted on
April 18, 2016 and, simultaneously with the City’s updated Comprehensive Land
Use Plan (CLUP) covering the years 2014 to 2024, was later approved or ratified by
the Sangguniang Panlalawigan of the Province of Bulacan sometime in
_____________ pursuant to the mandates of the Local Government Code of 1991,
as amended, and of E.O. No 72, series of 25 March 1993.
It must be recalled that local government units (LGUs), including cities and
municipalities, while empowered under R.A. 7160 or the Local Government Code
of 1991, as amended, and, in conformity with existing national laws, are enabled to
continue to prepare their Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUPs) by enacting them
through Zoning Ordinances which serves as the primary and dominant basis for the
future use of their land resources. These national laws upon which the preparation
of CLUPs and Zoning Ordinances LGUs must conform refers, for example, to Letter
of Instruction No. 729 dated August 9, 1978 which directed municipalities then to
submit their land use plans, enforcement systems and implementing guidelines,
including zoning ordinance, thru the HLURB for review and ratification. PD 933,
R.A. 7279 and E.O. No. 648, series of 1981, the Charter of the Housing and Land
Use Regulatory Board, empowered this Board to “promulgate” and “review,
evaluate and approve or disapprove comprehensive land use development plans and
zoning ordinances of local governments”.
The advent of the Local Government Code of 1991, as amended, and E.O.
No. 72, series of 1993 authorized the devolution of the powers of the HLURB to
approve and ratify CLUPs and Zoning Ordinances of component cities, including
the City of San Jose del Monte, to the Provinces thru the Sangguniang Panlalawigan
although still subject to the land use planning and zoning standards and guidelines
prescribed by the HLRB pursuant to national policies.
In the present appeal, records reveal that the updated CLUP and Zoning
Ordinance of the City of San Jose del Monte has divided or classified land uses in
the City into the following zones or sub-zones, to wit:
1. Nursery/Elementary School
2. Chapel/Church
3. Special schools such as performing arts school, speech clinics, schools for
the handicapped and schools for self-defence
Land use regulations within City limits intended for medium residential zone
(R-2), which is characterized mainly by low-rise single attached, duplex or multi-
level structures/residential buildings for exclusive use as multi-family dwellings,
permit all uses that are allowed in an R-1 zone. Within this R-2 zone, apartments,
boarding houses, dormitories, museums, libraries, high school, vocational school,
etc. are likewise permissible. Another land use regulation introduced is Socialized
Housing Zone (SHZ), which is a city area designated for housing [programs and]
projects covering houses and lots or home lots only undertaken by the Government
or the private sector for the underprivileged and homeless citizens.
Moving on to land use regulations falling under the City’s Commercial Zones
(C-1), a low density commercial area within the city intended for neighborhood or
community scale trade, service and business activities, the following allowable uses
therein are itemized, such as:
36. Customary accessory uses incidental to any of the above uses such
as:
• Staff houses/quarters • Parking lots/Building
• Storerooms and warehouses garage
but only as may be necessary • Pump houses
for the efficient conduct of the • Generator houses
business
Further examining the land use regulations under the Zoning Ordinance,
mostly within its Commercial Zone (C-2), a medium to high density commercial
area intended for trade, service and business activities performing complementary/
supplementary functions to the CBD, it is evident that all uses allowed in C-1 Zone
are equally permissible in this Commercial Zone (C-2). Other allowable uses in C-2
are as follows –
All the foregoing land use control and zoning regulations for the City of San
Jose del Monte under its Zoning Ordinance almost follow from top to bottom the
prescribed zoning and land use control standards and guidelines of this Board which
govern the preparation of land use plans and zoning ordinances of local government
units, except for one specific allowable use that plays consistently and conforms to
the standards of use regulations for general commercial zones or C-1 and C-2 areas
under the Model Zoning Ordinance1 of this Board, but was palpably excluded or
overlooked in the adoption of the use regulations for C-1 and C-2 zones in the City’s
Zoning Ordinance: “gasoline filling stations/services stations”.
For this essentially allowable use – gasoline filling/service stations in C-1 and
C-2 zones under this Board’s model zoning standards and guidelines in preparing
land use plans and zoning ordinances of LGUs – to be visibly excluded or excepted
in the C-1/C-2 zones conceived in the City’s Zoning Ordinance is basically odd and
deserves another hard look considering its undesirable direct and indirect impact on
other primary land uses and development activities that are essentially allowed under
the ordinance to be located in the C-1/C-2 zones.
Here lies the heart of the appellants’ locational clearance application for a
PT&T gasoline filling station which they planned to locate and operate on their real
property situated 50 meters on both sides of San Jose-Marilao Provincial Road and
falls within a Commercial-Industrial Zone (C-2). Not surprisingly, the exclusion or
omission of gasoline filling stations/service stations as an allowable land use within
C-1 or C-2 zones of the City has triggered the denial of the appellants’ application
before the City Planning & Development Office and of their appeal before the
LZBAA even though the proposed gasoline station was a permitted or allowable use
under the national standards and guidelines in preparing land use plans and zoning
ordinances for general commercial or C-1 and C-2 zones.
The said Model Zoning Ordinance is also Volume 3 of this Board’s Guidebook to Comprehensive
1
Land Use Plan Preparation and the prescribed standard or guidelines for dividing land in the local
government unit into different zones or sub-zones as well as the template for allowable uses in the various
zones.
centers, malls and supermarkets, recreational center or establishments,
transportation terminals/garage with and without repair, display for cars, tractors,
etc., motorpool, hauling services and garage terminals for trucks, tow trucks and
buses, auto sales and rentals, marine craft and aircraft sales yards, boat storage,
vehicle emission testing center, machinery display shop/center, machine shop
service operation (repairing/rebuilding or custom job orders), auto repair, tire,
vulcanizing shops and car wash (with garage/ parking area), construction supply
stores/depots, or commercial housing like hotel, apartment, apartel, pension house,
etc.
Assuming arguendo that in the commercial areas of the City other gasoline
filling stations/service stations already exist and/or operate under similar or different
commercial brands, thus, makes the proposed gasoline station of appellants in excess
of the requirements of the LGU, following the provisions of the local zoning law to
its logical conclusion will unavoidably and compulsorily make these otherwise
allowable uses or existing gasoline stations in the City suffer the identity of “non-
conforming uses and buildings”. Section 65 and 66 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance,
states, as follows:
Evidently, under the existing zoning law, the current crop of gasoline filling
stations or service stations in the City which lawfully uses any building, structure or
land at the time of the adoption of the ordinance, while they may continue although
their uses do not conform with the provision of the law, shall gradually suffer
business restraints, restricted capital expansions or improvements that may dampen
their competitive edges. The zoning controls adopted in their wake are designed to,
among others, disallow their use and activity from enlarging or extending to occupy
a greater area of land than that already occupied by their use, move (in whole or in
part) to any other portion of the lot or parcel of land where their non-conforming use
exists, alter their non-conforming structure in a way which increases its non-
conformity, etc. Again, although the general pattern and policy of uses for gasoline
filling stations/service stations are compatible with and allowable in C-1 and C-2
zones, the relevant provisions of the ordinance contravene this national standard and
planning guideline and in the process exclude would-be qualified business proposals
or restrict the growth or expansion of existing gasoline filling stations in C-1 and C-
2 zone in the City which are branded as non-conforming uses or buildings therein.
Finally, another odd aspect of the zoning regulation under review is found in
the Administration and Enforcement of the Ordinance, particularly in Section 57 on
the Processing Fees for Locational Clearance.
While the use regulation for gasoline filling stations or service stations was
not only excluded but also unmentioned in any of the divided or classified land uses
of the City, particularly in commercial zones where such use is generally allowable,
the administration part of the ordinance in the processing for locational clearance
surprisingly prescribes a certain sum of fee for special locational clearance for such
uses as gasoline station, cell sites, slaughter house, treatment plant, etc. Where the
project cost is P100,000.00 and below, the fees for special locational clearance is
P1,400.00; and when that cost is above P100,000.00, the special fees are P1,400 +
50% of 1% of cost in excess of P100,000.00. Evidently, as in the case of the present
appeal, whenever gasoline filling stations are proposed to be located or operated in
the City, the local zoning regulation that applies to such use or activities are those
that suits instances of variances/deviations considering that only special locational
clearances are the available remedies for applicants. Hence, although gasoline filling
stations are planning-wise allowable uses in general commercial areas, C-1 or C-2
zones, this particular use along with cell sites, slaughter house, treatment plant, etc.
is treated and classified to be a variance situation in the ordinance requiring a special
locational clearance.
Unfortunately, the local land use control or zoning policy for this specific use
will make the rules for deviation or variance as the general rule than the exceptional
or unique cases for which they apply. The use of special locational clearance through
variance or deviation, while by itself a valid remedy, is however susceptible to some
misuse or abuse, while also fostering spot zoning by local zoning authorities, a subtle
practice that is frowned upon by land use planning laws and guidelines. Considering
that gasoline filling stations was unmentioned as an allowable use in any of the zones
or land use classifications described by the ordinance, it will not be inconceivable
for such excepted use or activity to be located not only in C-1 or C-2 zones but also
in other zones or areas of the City, such as agro-industrial, residential, industrial, etc.
zones, by the simple expedience of resorting to a special locational clearance and the
requirements of the variance or deviation provisions of the ordinance.
No costs.