Varieties of The Fig
Varieties of The Fig
Varieties of The Fig
PAGE
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................323
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................................................................................325
VARIETIES OF THE CAPRIFIG TYPE..............................................................................326
Suggestive Key for Identification of California Caprifigs,
Profichi Crop.........................................................................................................................327
Caprifigs with Interior Violet or Purple; Skin Green......................................................328
Caprifigs with Interior Violet or Purple; Skin Green, Tinged with
Darker Shades of Brown or Violet....................................................................................332
Caprifigs with Interior White; Skin Green........................................................................335
Caprifigs with Interior White; Skin Brown or Purplish..................................................339
Miscellaneous Caprifigs; Interior Color not Determined...............................................340
VARIETIES OF THE SMYRNA TYPE...............................................................................342
Smyrna-type Figs with Skin Green or Yellow; Pulp White,
Amber, or Very Light Red.................................................................................................343
Smyrna-type Figs with Skin Green or Yellow; Pulp Various
Shades of Red......................................................................................................................345
Smyrna-type Figs with Skin Dark (Various Shades of Violet
to Black); Pulp White or Amber.......................................................................................354
Smyrna-type Figs with Skin Dark (Various Shades of Red, Brown
or Violet to Black); Pulp Various Shades of Red............................................................354
Smyrna-type Figs lacking Complete Descriptions..........................................................359
VARIETIES OF THE SAN PEDRO TYPE.........................................................................359
San Pedro-type Figs with Skin Green; Pulp Red.............................................................360
San Pedro-type Figs with Skin Bronze or Violet Pulp Amber or
Red........................................................................................................................................364
VARIETIES OF THE COMMON TYPE.............................................................................369
Suggestive Key for Identification of Common type Figs at
Riverside, California...........................................................................................................370
Figs with Skin Green or Yellow, Pulp Amber or
White.....................................................................................................................................372
Common-type Figs with Skin Green or Yellow; Pulp Various
Shades of Red.......................................................................................................................381
Common-type Figs with Skin Green or Yellow; Pulp Color not
Designated............................................................................................................................411
Common-type Figs with Skin Dark (Various Shades of Red,
Brown, or Violet to Black); Pulp White or Amber..........................................................414
Common-type Figs with skin Dark (Various Shades of Red,
Brown, or Violet to Black); Pulp Various Shades of Red...............................................420
Common-type Figs with Skin Dark (Various Shades of Red,
Brown, or Violet to Black); Pulp Color not Designated.................................................477
Common-type Varieties not Classified as to Color..........................................................479
INDEXED ALPHABETICAL LIST OF FIG VARIETIES.................................................481
LITERATURE CITED.............................................................................................................497
PLATES......................................................................................................................................511
HILGARDIA
A Journal of Agricultural Science Published by
the California Agricultural Experiment Station
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
THE COMMON FIG occurs in a great number of varieties, which have evolved mainly
as natural seedlings during the many centuries in which this fruit has been under
cultivation. As early as the fourth century B.C., Theophrastus (1916)4 reported that most
good fruits, including the fig, had received names. Ulysses, the hero of the Odyssey,
obtained from his father twenty fig trees, all with names. In the first century of the
Christian Era, Pliny (1855) listed twenty-nine varieties, with the localities in which they
were grown, and quoted Cato, who also had given names to several varieties. Pliny
further stated: “Since his [Cato’s] day there have been so many names and kinds come
up, that even on taking this subject into consideration, it must be apparent to everyone
how great are the changes which have taken place in civilized life.”
Various authorities maintain that certain figs now being grown in Italy are directly
descended by asexual propagation from the clonal varieties listed by Pliny, and are
therefore identical with them. Barnissotte, for example, is referred by Gallesio to “Fico
Africano” of Roman times. The Mission (Franciscana) fig of California, which was
introduced into the New World over four hundred years ago by the Spanish explorers,
had undoubtedly been previously propagated in southern Spain for many centuries.
Pliny listed names of figs and gave the color of mature fruits, but did not describe
varieties in detail. Porta, in his Pomarium of 1583 and his subsequent much larger work
of 1592, did little more than list varieties of that period, but he gave citations to previous
authorities on synonymy. Beginning with Aldrovandi in 1668, and more specifically
with Cupani in 1696, the accounts were sufficiently detailed to enable later writers to
compare characters and to identify varieties with more or less certainty. Subsequent
accounts or descriptions of fig varieties are numerous as shown in the appended
bibliography. Many have been purposely omitted from this monograph because the
____________
1 Received for publication March 4, 1954.
2 Paper No. 829, University of California Citrus Experiment Station, Riverside, California.
3 Professor of Subtropical Horticulture, Emeritus, and Subtropical Horticulturist, Emeritus, in the
Experiment Station.
4 See “Literature Cited” for citations, referred to in the text by author and date.
[ 323 ]
324 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
descriptions were very evidently not based on personal studies, but had been copied
from previous authorities. Too often, we find, writers copied verbatim, but failed to
mention the source of their information or to give credit to other authors.
This is not the first attempt to publish a monograph of fig varieties. A writer in
Revue Horticole (1865, p.31) told about an Italian, Suffren de Salerne, who had prepared
a monograph covering the descriptions and illustrations of 360 varieties. Apparently
the publication never got beyond the manuscript stage. Various authors call attention
to a compilation by Geny (1867) entitled “Les figuiers spontanés et cultivés dans les
Alpes Maritimes, Nice.” According to Eisen, this unpublished manuscript, which
consisted of colored plates without text, could not be located for his study in 1901.
Several accounts of fig varieties are excellent and detailed; examples are Vallese (1909),
Mann (1939), and Simonet et al. (1945). These deal mostly with restricted localities, and
are not monographic in character.
Probably the most complete publication is that of Eisen (1901), in which there were
described or listed some 348 common figs, 10 Smyrna figs, and 19 caprifigs. Students of
fig varieties have cause for regret that Dr. Eisen could not have been more specific as to
which crop he was considering in his descriptive notes, and that he failed in most cases
to state the locality in which the specimens were grown. Obviously, much has been
published in the ensuing fifty years, and horticulturists are enabled to study the
behavior of varieties under widely separated and varied climatic conditions.
Citations to early nursery catalogues in the United States are not included. Perusal of
several such catalogues by H. R. Fulton, United States Department of Agriculture,
shows that from 1771 to 1866, trees of numerous fig varieties were offered for sale at
prices ranging from fifty cents to one dollar each. Prominent among these nurseries
were the following: William R. Prince, Parsons and Co., and Stephen F. Mills, all of
Flushing, Long Island; John Bartram and Son, Philadelphia; William Kenrick, Newton,
Massachusetts; Hovey and Co., Boston; and Ellwanger and Barry, Rochester.
This monograph of fig varieties is based upon personal observations and studies
extending over a period of more than thirty years, mostly in California, but also
including notes taken during visits to France, Algeria, Italy, Greece, Turkey, Spain, and
Portugal. A few standard varieties were found growing even in Japan and China when
the author traveled in those countries in 1934—1935. Much has been learned from the
so-called Chiswick collection of figs, grown in four distinct localities of California.
Introduced in 1894 by the United States Department of Agriculture from the Royal
Horticultural Society of England, scions of each variety (some sixty-six in all) were
successfully grafted on trees in the orchard of the California Nursery Company at Niles.
A prized possession of the library of the University of California Citrus Experiment
Station at Riverside, is the record book containing penciled notes as well as outline
drawings made by John Rock and Gustav Eisen of these figs as grown at Niles and at
Biggs. Subsequently, the collection was transferred to the United States Plant
Introduction Garden, near Chico, where the author made notes on the varieties in 1916,
1918, and 1921. Cuttings of most of the varieties were established in a plot at Fresno in
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 325
1920, at Riverside in 1928, and again at Fresno in 1950. Numerous introductions have
been made from other parts of the United States and from foreign countries, mostly
through the Division of Exploration and Introduction, United States Department of
Agriculture. These are referred to in the text under Plant Introduction (P.I.) numbers.
As to variety names, Starnes and Monroe wrote, in 1907, that “no fruit comprising as
in this case but a single species, is so badly mixed as is the fig in its nomenclature.”
Reference to the text shows that the Brunswick has had at least twelve different names
attached to it, and the Brown Turkey has at least fourteen synonyms. This confusion in
nomenclature is emphasized by a comment from a correspondent in Algeria, “.....but
the names change from one village to another for the same variety, and it would need a
volume to establish complete synonyms.” Such varieties as Brown Turkey, Brunswick,
and the Ischia figs are undoubtedly identical with varieties grown over a long period in
some Mediterranean districts.
Recognized names have been established for the five commercial varieties grown in
California: Mission, Kadota, Adriatic, Calimyrna, and Brown Turkey. Any of their
various synonyms may be found in use in other areas.5 We have tried to clarify, so far
as possible, the nomenclature of all varieties treated in this monograph. Four types of
varieties are treated, namely, the Caprifig, the Smyrna, the San Pedro, and the
Common.
The use of Condit’s publication (1941a), entitled Fig Characteristics Useful in the
Identification of Varieties, is suggested for those who wish to become more familiar with
the descriptive terms used in this monograph.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Caprifigs are characterized by the presence inside the syconium of short styled pistillate
flowers, the ovaries of which may be inhabited by the larvae of the fig insect,
Blastophaga psenes Cav. In one or more crops, staminate flowers which produce pollen
may be present. Three crops of a caprifig tree are generally recognized and, as Eisen
(1896) predicted, their Italian names have become household words in various fig-
growing countries. These names are: Mamme, the first or winter crop, maturing in
California in early April; profichi, the second or spring crop, maturing in June; and
mammoni, the third crop, maturing in late summer. Further details about these names
and crops may be found in numerous publications, among which are the following:
Eisen (1896, 1901), Rixford (1918a), and Condit (1920a).
Caprification, the practice of providing for the pollination of the long styled flowers
of edible figs, has been carried on since ancient times in Asia, Africa, and Europe, and
varieties of caprifigs were undoubtedly recognized and names applied to them.
Contrary to the statement of Eisen (1901) that no caprifigs had previously been
described, Gasparrini published descriptions and illustrations of several varieties over a
century ago. Eisen himself described fifteen varieties under variety names, and four
more under numbers. The most fully detailed descriptions with illustrations are those
of F. Vallese (1909) and N. Mann (1939a).
There are very few records of attempts to classify caprifig varieties into groups or to
separate them by means of a key. One such key, published by W. T. Swingle (1905),
included seven principal varieties of Neapolitan caprifigs distinguished from each other
by size, shape, and lobes of leaves, length of petiole, and form and color of fruit. A key
to the identification of caprifigs can be constructed for the varieties commonly grown in
any one district but, like most botanical keys, it can hardly be sufficiently perfected to
avoid mistakes in identity, owing to local variation in size, shape, color, or other
characters. A sample dichotomous key to the principal caprifigs grown in California is
given here.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 327
The following list of varieties is divided into groups, based first on internal color of
meat and pulp, and secondly on external color of skin. A miscellaneous group includes
those which cannot be classified, because of inadequate descriptions.
Agouat. Described by Mauri (1939a); found near Sidi-Aich, vicinity of Beni-Ourlis,
Algeria. Tree vigorous and productive; leaves and fruits resemble those of Tit-en-
Tsekourt, but figs are larger and longer, with eye not so rosy; interior violet.
Akoran. Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939a) from trees at Beni-Aissi, Algeria.
Tree vigorous, productive; leaves large, generally 5-lobed. Fruit large, 2 inches broad
by 1-1/2 inches long, depressed at the apex, green at maturity; texture firm, well able to
withstand transportation; interior violet.
Amellal. (Name signifies “white,” because of the light color of the mature fruit.)
Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939a) a variety of which one tree only has been
propagated in the vicinity of Mekla.
Tree diffuse, very productive; season early; leaves large, 3- or 5-lobed. Fruit large, 2
to 2-1/4 inches in diameter, resembling that of Illoul, but less ribbed; green at maturity;
interior violet.
Arzagane. Described by Mann (1939a); found at Beni-Aissi, where it is also called
“Amerzagou.” Tree vigorous, productive, somewhat later than Tit-en-Tsekourt. Fruit
pyriform; interior violet.
Azigzaou. (Name signifies “green,” referring to the color of the mature fruit.)
Described and illustrated by Mann (1939a); fairly well distributed near Mekla.
Tree very vigorous, requiring a warm and sunny exposure, compact and erect; season
late; leaves almost entire, thick, and deep green. Fruit large, 2 to 2-1/4 inches broad, up
to 2 inches long, somewhat oblate; stalk short; color green; eye scales tinged red; interior
violet. Texture firm, especially good for transport.
Beurzel. Described and illustrated by Mann (1939a). Variety found in the vicinity of
Sidi-Aich, where it is called “Azigzaou”; also confused with Adras Violet; resembles
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 329
Agouat, but is earlier. Profichi large, less elongated than fruits of Adras Violet, green at
maturity; interior violet.
Excelsior (syn. Taylor). A seedling first distributed by G. P. Rixford, United States
Department of Agriculture; grown and fruited about 1916 by H. P. Taylor, Exeter,
California, who sold numerous cuttings at one dollar a foot; described by Condit
(1928a) and illustrated by him (1928c).
Tree vigorous and upright; terminal buds green; leaves medium; lateral sinuses
medium; petiolar sinus broad; base truncate to subcordate. (Plate 13.)6
Mamme crop fair, with many fruits imperfect; figs large, up to 1-1/2 inches in
diameter, pyriform, with short, thick neck; ribs fairly prominent; eye slightly depressed;
color green; interior light purple.
Profichi crop good; figs very large, up to 2 inches in diameter and 3 inches in length,
pyriform, with long, thick neck; ribs fairly prominent and elevated; eye in center of a
slight depression; white flecks conspicuous; color green; interior purple; pollen
abundant; cavity rather small for such a large fig. A midseason caprifig of large size,
but otherwise of no particular merit; not grown commercially.
Forbes (syn. Forbes Hardy). A seedling also distributed by G. P. Rixford; grown and
fruited by C. T. Forbes, Fresno, California; described by Condit (1928a) and illustrated
by him (1928c).
Tree with spreading habit of growth; terminal buds green.
Mamme crop fair; figs medium, spherical to pyriform, with short, flattened neck; ribs
fairly prominent; color green; interior purple.
Profichi crop fair only; figs medium, turbinate, with distinct neck generally
compressed or flattened; ribs prominent and somewhat elevated white flecks large,
scattered; color green to yellowish green; interior purple. A caprifig of no particular
value, and no longer propagated.
Heiny No. 1. A seedling developed by Francis Heiny, Brawley, California; seldom
found in commercial fig orchards.
Tree moderately vigorous; terminal buds green. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy
above, 3- to 5-lobed; upper sinuses moderately deep and narrow, lower shallow; base
subcordate to truncate; margins coarsely crenate to dentate.
Mamme figs medium, turbinate, with short neck; skin color dark green; interior
purple.
Profichi crop fair; figs medium, turbinate, with thick neck; white flecks conspicuous;
eye scales straw color; skin green; interior purple; season late.
Kearney. A seedling distributed by G. P. Rixford under his No. 2,830 in 1916, and
fruited at Kearney Park, Fresno. Described by Condit (1928a) and illustrated by him
(1928c); also described by Brooks and Olmo (1946); seldom found in commercial fig
districts.
Tree vigorous, spreading, with green terminal buds; leaves above medium 3- to 5-
lobed; sinuses of medium depth; base truncate to subcordate; outer margins coarsely
serrate.
Mamme crop good; figs large, turbinate, with very short, thick neck and stalk, or
neck absent; ribs prominent; color green, often tinged with violet white flecks very
conspicuous; scales of eye often tinged violet; interior purple.
_____________
6 All plates will be found at back of this issue, in a consecutively numbered group.
330 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Profichi crop inclined to be small; figs large, turbinate to spherical; neck and stalk
short, thick; color light green; interior purple; meat white tinged with violet; inclined to
become soft and pulpy. Midseason.
Mammoni figs numerous, unusually large, maturing over a long season; pulpy and
attractive to dried-fruit beetles.
Mendolaro. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909); more common in Lecce
district than Colombaro.
Leaves small, generally 5-lobed. Mamme figs rather small, oblate, deep green, partly
tinged with violet. Profichi medium, turbinate; color green; interior light violet;
stamens numerous.
Milco (syn. Endrich). See descriptions by Eisen (1901), Roeding (1914), Rixford
(1918a), Condit (1920a, 1947); illustrations of tree and fruit by Condit (1920a), and of
fruit (1933). According to Eisen, this variety was imported by G. N. Milco from
Dalmatia. On the other hand, Rixford states that there is little doubt that it was
introduced by W. B. West under the name Verdoni, and later exploited by Milco, whose
name it bears. However, this is in conflict with statements by Maslin (1890, page 410)
and others that Verdoni is the name under which W. B. West introduced the White
Adriatic from Italy. Milco is the oldest and for several decades the most widely
distributed caprifig in California; trees are still found in commercial orchards, but are
now seldom propagated or planted.
Trees upright, well branched; terminal buds green; leaves medium, mostly 5-lobed;
sinuses medium; base subcordate; surface somewhat glossy, gray green in color;
petioles tawny to slightly violet near insertion with blade.
Mamme crop good; figs medium, 1-1/2 inches in diameter, spherical, mostly without
neck; ribs inconspicuous; white flecks numerous, commonly tinged with violet; color
green; bloom prominent; interior purple. Mamme figs are generally regarded as
exceptionally resistant to frost damage.
Profichi crop fair to good; figs medium, oblique-spherical to turbinate, mostly
without neck; ribs narrow, only slightly elevated; eye in center of a definite depression.
surface dull green, with prominent bloom; white flecks large, scattered, fading out at
maturity; interior light purple. Season late. (Plate 6.)
Roeding No. 1. See descriptions by Eisen (1901), Roeding (1903, 1914), Rixford
(1918a), and Condit (1920a, 1933, 1947), with illustrations of profichi (1920a, 1933). It
was introduced from Meander Valley of Turkey in 1887 by Fred Roeding, Fresno, and
for many years was the most widely planted of any caprifig because of tree vigor and
ease of propagation; it was later superseded by better varieties.
Tree vigorous, spreading, with green terminal buds, inclined to produce numerous
hollow, polleniferous figs or “blanks”; leaves medium, 3- to 5-lobed, middle lobe broad
toward apex, narrowed toward base; sinuses rather shallow; base cordate; margins
coarsely crenate throughout; surface dull.
Mamme crop good; figs small, oblate-spherical, without neck; ribs indistinct, narrow;
color green, with conspicuous, small white flecks; interior purple.
Profichi crop good if well colonized by blastophagas; figs variable, small to medium,
from 1 to 1-1/2 inches in diameter, turbinate to spherical, with or without short,
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 331
prominent neck; ribs present but inconspicuous; eye slightly protruding from the
rounded apex; color light green; white flecks fairly large and scattered; interior purple.
Season medium early. (Plate 6.)
Roeding No. 4. A variety of uncertain origin and identity; probably introduced by
the Fancher Creek Nursery, Fresno, but exact records lost; see descriptions by Condit
(1920a, 1947).
Tree vigorous, upright, with slender branches much like those of Roeding No.2; bark
smooth, not scaly; leaves below medium to small, 3- to 5-lobed; sinuses moderately
deep and open; base truncate to somewhat decurrent.
Mamme crop generally good; figs medium, up to 1-1/4 inches in diameter, spherical,
without neck, or pyriform, with neck somewhat flattened; stalk short; ribs fairly
prominent; eye small, with chaffy scales; white flecks prominent, scattered; color green,
with rather prominent bloom; interior purple.
Profichi crop good; figs medium or larger, turbinate; eye protrudes from the slightly
depressed apex; neck short or sometimes wanting, occasionally more prominent and
somewhat flattened; color green, with numerous and prominent white flecks; interior
deep purple. Season late.
Another caprifig commonly designated as No.4 differs from the above in having
profichi with prominent ribs producing a corrugated surface, and with prominent neck
distinctly flattened. Roeding No.4 has no particular value as a caprifig except for the
late season of ripening of the profichi.
Rotondo (syn. Caprificus sphaerocarpa Gasparrini). Description of Gasparrini (1845)
quoted by Vallese (1964). Profichi spherical, somewhat ribbed; stalk short; color green;
pulp light violet.
Samson (syn. Markarian No. 1). See description by Condit (1920a, 1947) and
illustration by him (1920a). Original California tree is on the Stanford ranch, Vina;
introduced from Asia Minor by the Bulletin Company, San Francisco, 1882; propagated
and distributed by W. H. Samson, Corning, as Capri No.5, and described by him in 1906
as a very compact grower and productive of all three crops; later distributed by Henry
Markarian, Fresno, as Markarian No.1; large trees commonly found in commercial fig
plantings.
Tree moderately vigorous, exceptionally dense or much branched; trunks of older
trees characteristically furrowed or creased; terminal buds green; leaves medium, 5-
lobed, sometimes with additional basal lobes; sinuses of moderate depth; base cordate;
margins crenate; surface somewhat glossy.
Mamme crop fair; figs medium, oblique-turbinate, with short neck and stalk; ribs
fairly prominent; color green, with numerous and conspicuous white flecks; interior
deep purple.
Profichi crop fair; figs medium to large, turbinate, with neck prominent and thick or
sometimes tapering and up to 1/2 inch long; ribs moderately prominent; white flecks
large, and very conspicuous on immature fruit; color light green; bloom prominent;
interior violet-purple; stamens generally good but sometimes rusty and unproductive
of pollen. Midseason. (Plate 6.) Profichi are invariably affected by a virus which causes
some of the young figs to become malformed and to drop, or to be blemished with
mosaic spots in the form of a ring or crescent. See Condit (1920a, fig. 12), and Condit
and Horne (1943).
332 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
San Antonio. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Leaves very small,
scabrous, dark green above, shallowly 3-lobed. Profichi flask-shaped; apex rounded,
with the center protruding like a nipple; neck prominent, gradually narrowing to the
stalk; color pea green; interior violet.
Tardivo (syn. Gagliano del Capo). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909); also
described by De Rosa (1911).
Leaves large, intense green, somewhat scabrous on upper side, generally 3-lobed;
sinuses shallow. Profichi of medium size; neck short; apex rounded, slightly nippled at
center; color clear green, with few white flecks; interior purple.
Tit-en-Tsekourt (syn. Ain-el-Hadjel). Listed by Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872).
Described and illustrated by Mann (1939a). Name signifies “eye of the partridge,”
because of the rosy color of the eye scales. Recognized throughout Kabylia by its
variety name.
Tree spreading, productive; leaves large, 3-lobed.
Profichi large, from 1-1/2 to 2 inches in diameter; body spherical, with short neck;
eye conspicuous, on account of rosy scales; color green; interior violet.
Abetroune. Described and illustrated by Mann (1939a); named after place of origin;
regarded as one of the earliest varieties at Tizi-Rached, Algeria.
Tree productive and vigorous; leaves almost entire, or sometimes 5-lobed. Profichi
large, up to 2 inches in diameter, pyriform, with medium stalk; color green, sometimes
tinged with violet at maturity; eye scales green, or rose-tinted; interior violet.
Adras Violet. Described and illustrated by Mann (1939a) ; found with Adras Blanc,
but is later in season of maturity and has a violet interior. At Ouadhias, Algeria, it is
sometimes erroneously called Beurzel, and is also confused with other varieties.
Tree generally of large size, much branched, compact, and very productive; leaves
generally 5-lobed, but variable.
Profichi small, 1-1/2 inches in diameter, pyriform; stalk short; color green, tinged
with violet at maturity; interior violet.
Ayers. A variety found in the orchard of A. F. Ayers and of other growers near
Merced, California; similar in habit of growth to trees of Roeding No. 2, but terminal
buds are violet-brown, and fruit characters are decidedly different. Leaves below
medium size.
Mamme crop good; figs below medium to small in size, somewhat oblate; neck
absent or very short, and often slightly flattened; ribs fairly prominent; color green,
tinged with violet; white flecks conspicuous; interior very light purple.
Profichi below medium in size; neck fairly prominent, slightly flattened; stalk short;
white flecks conspicuous on the green surface; apex broad, not depressed; interior
purple.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 333
Gemini II. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Leaves very small, bright
green above, ordinarily deeply 7-lobed, more rarely 5- or 3-lobed. Profichi conical,
elongated, oblique, ribbed, rather long-stalked; color bright green, with white flecks,
becoming yellowish violet at complete maturity; interior light violet.
Mammoni and mamme crops not observed.
Grosso. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Leaves of medium size,
scabrous, deep green above, lighter below, asymmetrical, 5- or 3-lobed, sinuses deep
and broad. Profichi very large, oblique-pyriform; apex rounded, slightly nippled at
center; color bright green, changing at maturity to pale green tinged with violet; interior
violet.
Hamma. Introduced in 1901 from Algiers as a very valuable variety, found growing
by a stone quarry above the Jardin d’Essai du Hamma. “It is probably from this tree
that the Blastophaga was introduced into California in 1899.” (Swingle, in description
of P.I. No. 6,475; see also, No. 6,481, P.I. Inventory No. 10.)
Tree vigorous; leaves medium, 3- to 5-lobed; base truncate to subcordate. Mamme
crop fair at Riverside, California; figs below medium, pyriform, with prominent short
neck; white flecks prominent; surface smooth, hardly at all ribbed; color green; interior
violet.
Profichi crop good; figs below medium, pyriform, with prominent neck and short
stalk; color green until mature, then becoming reddish violet with conspicuous bloom;
interior violet. Quality fair, but not worthy of commercial planting.
Howard (syn. Solms-Laubach No. 3). Described by Eisen (1901); received (probably
at Niles, California) from Solms-Laubach, Naples, and named for L. 0. Howard. A
violet-brown fig with violet interior; probably never widely propagated or distributed.
Kara Mor. (Turkish name signifies “purplish black.”) This variety supplies over sixty
per cent of the caprifigs of the Meander Valley, according to Condit and Baskaya (1948).
Tree large, vigorous; leaves deeply lobed, much like those of Sari Lop. Figs large,
top-shaped, with neck; color purplish black; interior purple.
Magnissalis. See account of Roeding (1914) and description by Condit (1920a)
introduced from Aidin, Turkey, by G. C. Roeding in 1901, and named alter S. G.
Magnissalis; now rare or nonexistent in California.
Tree vigorous, densely branched, with large leaves; terminal buds green. Mamme
crop generally good; figs medium, spherical, mostly without neck; eye large, protruding
from apex; scales green, or violet-tinted; ribs fairly prominent; color green, flushed with
light violet; white flecks few, scattered; interior purple.
Profichi above medium to large, pyriform, with prominent neck; ribs narrow, very
slightly elevated; eye fairly large, not depressed; color green, with delicate bloom; white
flecks irregular in size, fairly conspicuous; interior purple. A green fig, but placed in
this section because of the violet mamme figs.
Montesino. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Leaves medium in size,
generally 3-lobed, but rarely entire or nearly so; sinuses rather shallow.
334 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Profichi oblique-pyriform, with rounded, slightly nippled apex; stalk rather long; color
green, becoming violet at maturity; interior violet.
Ricciuto (syn. Caprificus rugosa Gasparrini). Description of Gasparrini (1845)
quoted by Vallese (1904). A variety common at Portici, and regarded more highly than
Chiajese on account of its greater production of blastophagas.
Mamme small, spherical, rugose, somewhat flattened at the apex; color violet.
Profichi large as a guinea hen’s egg; ribs elevated; color green; pulp light violet.
Rock (syn. Solms-Laubach No.2). Described by Eisen (1901). Received in California
from Solms-Laubach, Naples, and named for John Rock, Niles. Rock (according to
Eisen) was the “owner of the largest assortment of fig varieties collected in one place.”
A pyriform caprifig, with violet-colored ribs and violet interior. Probably never
propagated or distributed.
Roeding No. 2. See description by Eisen (1901) as Smyrna No.2, and by Roeding
(1903, 1914), Rixford (1918a); and Condit (1920a, 1947). Introduced by Fred Roeding,
Fresno, with Roeding No.1, but is seldom found in commercial plantings.
Tree distinctive, on account of its upright habit of growth and slender twigs; bark of
trunk scaly, as shown by Condit (1941a, figure 20); leaves below medium, mostly 5-
lobed; sinuses, of medium depth; base cordate; surface somewhat glossy.
Mamme crop small or none; figs small, 1 inch or less in diameter, spherical, without
neck; ribs narrow, mostly prominent; eye scales pinkish; color greenish violet; interior
purple.
Profichi crop fair to good; figs small to medium, spherical to pyriform, with
prominent neck that is often flattened; apex rounded, with eye slightly protruding;
surface smooth, glossy, greenish yellow, becoming reddish violet at complete maturity;
interior purple. Season later than Roeding No.1.
Mammoni crop practically none.
Roeding No. 3. See descriptions by Eisen (1901, as Smyrna No.3), Roeding (1903,
1914), and Condit (1920a, 1933, 1947), with illustrations of fruit (1920a, 1933). It was
introduced in 1887 by Fred Roeding, Fresno, with Roeding No.1 and Roeding No.2,
from Meander Valley of Turkey. Cuttings were planted and numbered from one to
three in the nursery row; No.3 proved to be the earliest in season of maturity, and No.2
the latest. Roeding No.3 shares with Stanford the distinction of being the most valuable
and highly regarded caprifig variety in California (plate 3).
In good soil, tree is vigorous, much branched, with short, slender twigs;
distinguished from most common varieties by the brown or violet coloration of
dormant fruit and terminal buds, and by the violet color of the mamme figs. Leaves
below medium to small, 3- to 5-lobed; middle lobe broad above, narrowing toward
base; sinuses of medium depth; base subcordate; margins crenate; surface somewhat
glossy.
Mamme crop generally good, usually consisting of two types of figs, both medium in
size, up to 1 or 1-1/2 inches in diameter, oblate to oblique-turbinate, with or without
short, thick neck; figs of one type are green or light violet in color; ribs prominent;
texture somewhat soft or “punky”; apparently not fully inhabited by blastophagas;
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 335
susceptible to frost injury. Figs of the second type are violet-purple in color; ribs either
not prominent or entirely absent; texture solid or firm; white flecks small and
inconspicuous, somewhat masked by violet coloration of skin; eye depressed, in center
of the broadly flattened apex; scales reddish brown; interior purple, with meat also
tinged with violet.
Profichi crop very good; polleniferous or uninhabited figs inclined to stay green and
remain on tree; insectiferous figs variable, from medium to large, up to 2 inches in
diameter and over 2 inches in length, pyriform, with neck prominent, sometimes
curved, and often distinctly flattened; apex broad, flattened, with the eye protruding
from center of a slight depression; eye scales chaffy, erect at maturity; ribs prominent,
narrow; color light green, with white flecks numerous and conspicuous; bloom
prominent; interior purple. Season early. (Plate 6.)
Mammoni crop small but ample.
Rosso. Described by De Rosa (1911) Profichi subspherical, almost sessile eye scales
rosy; color violet; pulp light red, somewhat edible at complete maturity.
Schwarz (syn. Solms-Laubach No. 4). Described by Eisen (1901); received in
California from Solms-Laubach, Naples, and named for E. A Schwarz. A pyriform
caprifig of violet-brown skin color and violet interior Probably not propagated or
distributed.
Solms-Laubach (syn. Solms-Laubach No.1). Described by Eisen (1901) received from
Solms-Laubach, Naples, but apparently not propagated or distributed in California.
Profichi oblique-turbinate, mahogany brown, with violet flush in sun; “meat yellowish
white, with a few violet streaks.”
Ak-kaba. A Turkish variety which transports well because of its thick meat,
according to Condit and Baskaya (1948). Figs very large, pyriform, light green; interior
white or very light pink.
Azaim (syn. Orzidane). Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939a) as variety found
at Beni-Aissi, near Fort National; sometimes confused with Adras Blanc.
Leaves generally 5-lobed, with shallow sinuses. Profichi rather large, up to 2 inches
in diameter, spherical, with surface almost smooth; color green; eye scales green,
sometimes rose-tinted; interior white; texture firm, readily transported. Season early,
same as Illoul.
Bianco (syn. Caprificus leucocarpa Gasparrini). Described and illustrate Gasparrini
(1845); description quoted by Vallese (1904). A variety little grown near Naples, as it
produces few blastophagas.
Mamme about 1 inch long, smooth, turbinate; color green to violet. Profichi about
twice as large as mamme; color pale green; pulp white. The "Bianco" described by De
Rosa (1911) appears to be a different variety.
Colombaro. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909); cultivated under other
names near Lecce, and in many adjacent districts.
Tree vigorous; leaves of medium size, generally 3-lobed; sinuses deep.
336 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Mamme crop small. Profichi large, pyriform, with long neck; color green, dotted with
white flecks; interior white; cavity relatively small. Season first ten days of July.
Mammoni very few.
Croisic (syns. Saint John, Cordelia, Pingo de Mel, Gillette). Described as Croisic by
Solms-Laubach (1882, 1885), Trabut (1901), Leclerc du Sablon (1908), Rixford (1920a),
and Condit (1942, 1947). Described as Saint John or Saint Johns by Wythes (1890b,
1900b), Wright (1895), Eisen (1901), Bunyard and Thomas (1904), Starnes and Monroe
(1907, as Saint Jean Blanc), B. A. Bunyard (1925), 0. T. (1905), Thompson (1925), and
Preston (1951). Described as Cordelia by Eisen (1896, 1901). Described as Pingo de Mel
by Coleman (1887a), Eisen (1901), Thomas (1902), Henslow (1902), Cheffins (1905),
Royal Horticultural Society (1916), and Condit (1921b).
In 1882, Solms-Laubach reported observations both at Croisic and at Cherbourg,
France, of an edible fig which, like the caprifig, had a zone of male flowers inside near
the eye. Three years later he expressed the opinion that Croisic is simply a highly
developed caprifig deprived of the blastophagas which normally inhabit caprifigs. In
July, 1893, Gustav Eisen noticed in the San Francisco market some large yellow figs
shipped from Cordelia, California. He examined the fruit and found “every one with a
fully developed zone of male flowers, fully ripe, and with an abundant, perfectly
developed pollen.” Eisen concluded that this fig was possibly identical with the Croisic
described by Solms-Laubach, but he placed it in a special class, the Cordelia, or Ficus
carica relicta. At a meeting of the Royal Horticultural Society, July 8, 1902, Henslow
cited the fig variety Pingo de Mel as an exception to the rule that all edible figs are
female, since its fruit bore stamens.
According to Wythes (1890b), the Saint John, exhibited by Veitch and Sons, Chelsea,
at the Temple Show in London, was a welcome addition to the list of good varieties. In
1900, Wythes expressed the opinion that Pingo de Mel and Saint John were not the
same. However, George Bunyard, also O. T. and Thompson, regarded the two as
identical, and recommended the variety as one of the best for forcing in pots.
Trees of the Croisic are occasionally found in California, especially in the vicinity of
San Francisco Bay. They are also grown in a small way in Oregon under the name
“Gillette,” because cuttings were obtained from the Gillet Nursery, Nevada City,
California. P.I. No. 6,952, obtained from Malta as Tin Baitri or Saint John, and Nos.
18,858 and 18,885 of the Chiswick collection, have all proved to be identical with
Croisic.
Tree vigorous and productive; leaves medium to large, mostly 5-lobed; sinuses
medium, narrow; base subcordate.
Profichi medium or above, up to 1-3/4 inches in diameter, pyriform with distinct
neck; ribs prominent, with surface often somewhat corrugated; eye fairly large, with
yellowish-green scales; color greenish yellow; interior white; edible pulp insipid,
lacking in sugar; staminate flowers few, generally lacking in pollen.
Mammoni crop scanty in interior valleys but fair in cool, coastal climates; figs much
the same as profichi.
Elma. (Turkish name signifying “apple.”) Described by Condit and Baskaya (1948).
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 337
Tree large, with prominent nodal swellings; leaves dark green. Figs large, spherical,
green, with white interior. Less productive of blastophagas than some other caprifigs.
Gemini I. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Leaves of medium size;
generally 5-lobed, with deep sinuses. Profichi medium, top-shaped, with broad,
rounded apex; color green; interior white. Mammoni and mamme crops not observed.
Hajji Mestan. A Turkish variety, named after a person, according to Condit and
Baskaya (1948). Figs contain numerous blastophagas, but shrivel easily in hot weather;
for some unaccountable reason, this variety is more susceptible than other caprifigs to
attacks of Lonchaea aristella Beck., the black fly.
Figs medium, pyriform, light green; interior white.
Illoul (syn. Aoriv). Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939a); name derived from
place of origin; variety very common at Tizi-Rached, Fort National, where it represents
fifty per cent of the caprifigs of the district grown near Mekla under the name Aoriv.
Tree vigorous, diffusely branched, productive; leaves 3- to 5-lobed, rarely entire.
Profichi rather large, 1-1/2 to 2 inches in diameter, spherical; stalk thick and short;
surface slightly ribbed; color greenish yellow; eye green; interior white. Season very
early.
Kongur. A Turkish variety, named after a place, according to Condit and Baskaya
(1948). Figs medium, top-shaped, green; interior white. Season late.
Kuyucak. A Turkish variety, named after a place, according to Condit and Baskaya
(1948). Tree of medium size; leaves shallowly lobed. Figs medium, pyriform, green;
interior white. Season late.
Loomis. Seedling No.147, from the Maslin orchard at Loomis; described by Rixford
(1918a) as producing one of the earliest crops in the orchard. Trees never planted
commercially and now rarely found. Profichi large, with distinct neck and prominent
ribs; color green; interior white.
Madel (syn. Oumadel). Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939a); named for the
proprietor of the original planting, located by the railroad at Sidi-Aich; also grown in
Takricts, valley of the Soummam, under the name Oumadel. Tree vigorous and
productive. Profichi with white interior. Season early.
Markarian (syn. Markarian No. 2). Described and illustrated by Condit (1920a).
Variety propagated and distributed by W. H. Samson, Corning, California, probably
from a tree introduced from Asia Minor by the Bulletin Company of San Francisco;
described by Samson (1906) as Capri No. 3; later obtained by Henry Markarian, Fresno,
and grown as Markarian No. 2.
Tree with upright branches, similar in habit of growth and foliage to that of Sari Lop
(Calimyrna). Rarely found in collections of caprifigs.
Mamme crop light; figs medium or above, oblate, without neck; stalk thick and short,
inclined to be flattened; ribs narrow but prominent; eye rather large, in center of a
distinct, craterlike protrusion; color light green; interior white.
Profichi crop fair to good; figs large, up to 2 inches in diameter, pyriform,
338 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
with neck often distinctly flattened; eye in center of a broad depression; ribs few but
prominent; white flecks scattered, inconspicuous; color light green; interior white.
Midseason.
Maslin seedling caprifigs. See accounts by Rixford (1912, 1918a). Seedlings
distributed under numbers by the United States Department of Agriculture and given
names as follows: No. 70, Bleasdale; No. 144, Mason; No. 147, Loomis; No. 148,
Newcastle. These varieties are separately mentioned in this work, in their respective
color groups. None have been planted commercially, and trees are now seldom found,
or are completely lost. Many show close relationship to Sari Lop (the probable female
parent), in having branches with swollen nodes, large, deeply-lobed leaves, and profichi
with flattened neck.
Maslin No. 150. An unnamed Maslin seedling, of sufficient merit to warrant
inclusion in a commercial planting at Orosi, California.
Tree upright, with branches somewhat swollen at the nodes; terminal buds green.
Leaves large, mostly 5-lobed; sinuses rather shallow; base broadly subcordate; petiole
thick, of medium length; margins shallowly crenate.
Mamme crop fair; figs large, oblique-turbinate to oblate; neck sometimes flattened;
eye in center of a craterlike protrusion; ribs prominent, narrow; color light green, with
scattered white flecks; interior white.
Profichi crop good; figs large, onion-shaped; neck prominent, somewhat flattened;
ribs slightly elevated; apex broad, not depressed; color green; interior white.
Mason. Seedling No.144, from the Maslin orchard at Loomis; described by Rixford
(1918a); named after S. C. Mason, who discovered it. Figs large, green; interior white.
Not grown commercially.
Medloub (syn. Bou Ankir). Briefly described by Mauri (1939a). Variety found at
Sidi-Aich, but tree not in production; resembles Adras Blanc, but is green, with white
interior.
Newcastle. Seedling No. 148, from the Maslin orchard at Loomis; described by
Rixford (1918a). Figs large, turbinate, with flattened neck; color green; interior white.
Primaticcio. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Leaves large, generally 3-
lobed; sinuses deep. Profichi medium, turbinate; color deep green; interior white.
Samson caprifigs. Varieties obtained by W. H. Samson, Corning, from the Stanford
ranch, Vina, and distributed under numbers in 1906. No. 1 was later identified as
Stanford, and No. 5 as Samson (Markarian No.1).
Stanford. Described and illustrated by Condit (1920a, 1933); description only (1947).
This variety was mentioned by Rixford (1912) under the name Stanford as “a splendid
tree, growing at the Stanford ranch at Vina. It was raised from a cutting imported by
the writer during the winter of 1881-1882, from the Smyrna district of Asia Minor.”
According to A. Nadir and M. Halit (1929), Kara Ilek, the best caprifig of the Smyrna fig
district, is the same as Stanford. Distributed by W. H. Samson, Corning, as Capri No. 1
Stanford and Roeding No. 3 are the best commercial varieties of caprifig grown in
California.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 339
Tree vigorous, spreading (see plate 3, and Condit, 1920a); terminal buds green; leaves
above medium to large, 5-lobed, middle lobe up to 2-3/4 inches broad; sinuses medium
to deep; base truncate to subcordate or decurrent; margins crenate on upper half of
lobes, entire toward the base; surface slightly glossy. (Plate 13.)
Mamme crop good; figs medium or above, up to 1-1/2 inches in diameter, oblique-
turbinate, mostly with short, thick neck and short stalk; ribs present, slightly elevated;
white flecks large and conspicuous; color green, with prominent bloom; eye scales light
green.
Profichi crop excellent; figs above medium, pyriform, generally oblique; neck distinct,
often somewhat curved; stalk up to 1/4 inch long; ribs not prominent; eye scales chaffy;
white flecks scattered, inconspicuous; color light green; interior white (plate 6).
Midseason.
Mammoni crop small but ample.
Taranimt. Listed by Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872); described and illustrated by
Mauri (1939a); figs very similar to those of the Smyrna-type Taranimt, hence the name;
cultivated at Beni-Aissi, Algeria.
Leaves entire, or nearly so. Profichi large, up to 2 inches in diameter, pyriform, with
short stalk; color green; interior white. Season earlier than Adras Violet.
Adras Blanc. Described and illustrated by Mann (1939a); found in Kabylia under
various names, such as “Azaim” at Ouadhias, and probably “Bouhioua” at Beni-Aissi;
at Sidi-Aich it may be the same as Ameza
Tree vigorous, very compact, productive; leaves 3- to 5-lobed.
Profichi medium, 1-3/4 inches in diameter, pyriform; stalk very short; color green,
tinged with violet; interior white. Season earlier than that of Adras Violet but less
prolonged.
Averane. Described by Mauri (1939a). Name indicates a foreign or imported variety.
Found at Beni-Aissi. In appearance of tree, foliage, and fruit it resembles Adras Blanc,
but the season is later, and the profichi are violet-black outside.
Brawley. A seedling produced by Francis Heiny, Brawley, from a cross of Kadota
with pollen of Ficus pseudo-carica.
Branches and twigs slender, pubescent; terminal buds dingy green or slightly violet;
leaves small, entire to mostly 3-lobed; sinuses shallow; base truncate; margins finely
serrate.
Mamme crop good; figs small, up to 7/8 inch diameter, spherical; neck short,
distinctly flattened; apex rounded, with eye slightly protruding; stalk short; ribs fairly
prominent; color violet, with distinct bloom; white flecks present, but obscured by body
color; interior white; stamens present. Reported to be exceptionally resistant to winter
injury.
Profichi crop good; figs small or below medium, up to 1-1/4 inches in diameter,
turbinate, with slender neck; ribs somewhat elevated; eye slightly protruding from the
rounded apex; white flecks scarce, practically absent; color green, gradually changing to
reddish purple; interior white. Midseason. A good caprifig, except for its small size.
340 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Bsikri. P.I. No. 6,478, from Chetma oasis, near Biskra, Algeria, in 1900. Profichi crop
good at Riverside, California. Figs medium, pyriform; neck short, prominent,
somewhat flattened; stalk short; ribs narrow, somewhat elevated; eye medium,
protruding slightly from apex; color violet-brown at maturity; interior white; cavity
small; quality fair. Season late.
Ficus palmata Forsk. This Indian form of F. carica, probably introduced by Dr. F.
Franceschi, of Santa Barbara, has long been found in fig collections in Algeria and
California, and in both places has been used for hybridizing. See Trabut (1922) and
Condit (1947). No named varieties have been established. Practically evergreen in mild
climates, with new growth starting in late January. The character of earliness is
inherited by hybrids.
Trees variable in vigor and habit of growth; twigs pubescent, slender; terminal buds
green or colored; leaves very variable, from entire or nonlobed to deeply dissected.
(Plate 13.)
Mamme figs usually contain staminate flowers which mature pollen.
Profichi crop generally good, but figs are too small for use in commercial
caprification. Figs mostly purple outside, and invariably white inside; stigmas of very
young figs sometimes distinctly colored pink.
Ficus pseudo-carica Miq. This species, indigenous to Eritrea and Abyssinia, was
introduced into California by Dr. F. Franceschi, of Santa Barbara, in 1902; sometimes
designated as “Abyssinian caprifig.” Like F. palmata, it has been used for hybridizing
with F. carica. See Franceschi (1912), Rixford (1912, 1918a), Rixford and Heiny (1911),
Trabut (1922), and Condit (1947, 1920a); the last with illustration of fruit and leaves.
The tree has slender, willowy branches, with dormant buds violet; leaves small,
mostly 3-lobed; sinuses medium; base truncate; texture thin, velvety; petioles very
pubescent, russet in color; mosaic spots prominent, with some leaves dwarfed or
malformed. (Plate 13.)
Mamme figs small, pyriform, with prominent, slender neck and long, slender stalk;
color violet-purple; interior white; staminate flowers present.
Profichi small, elongated-pyriform, with slender neck and long stalk; ribs narrow; eye
protruding; color brown to purplish black; interior white. (Plate 6.)
Maslin No. 91. This seedling, from the Maslin orchard at Loomis, is occasionally
found in variety collections. Unlike most Maslin seedlings, the figs are purple outside
rather than green ; interior white. It has not been given a variety name.
Van Lennep. Listed in the 1915-1916 catalogue of Fancher Creek Nurseries, Fresno;
introduced from Smyrna by P. Van Lennep of Auburn; variety probably lost. Profichi
purplish brown; interior white.
Algiers No. 1 and No. 2. Listed by Eisen (1901) as forwarded by W. T. Swingle from
Algeria to the United States Department of Agriculture, and then to John Rock, Niles,
California.
Bardakji. Mentioned by Nadir and Halit (1929) as a variety from the Smyrna district,
Turkey.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 341
Swingle (syns. Algiers No. 3, Capri Smyrna No. 4). Described by Eisen (1901) as a
variety imported by the United States Department of Agriculture from Algiers, and
established on the place of George Roeding, Fresno. Blastophagas were first
successfully colonized on this tree in the spring of 1899. Named for W. T. Swingle.
Mamme figs large, greenish yellow.
Taylor (syn. Italian No.1). Described by Eisen (1901). Introduced by the United
States Department of Agriculture from Italy as “Troano”; named by Eisen for W. A.
Taylor. Tree of spreading growth. Profichi medium, light green, with a purple tint.
Mammoni large, unusually early.
Thaberkant (a black fig) and Tifouzal. Listed by Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872).
Neapolitan caprifigs. A collection of caprifig cuttings obtained in 1902 at Naples by
W. T. Swingle (1905), and introduced under Plant Introduction Nos. 8,829 to 8,847. No
variety names are given, but seven of the principal kinds are described and separated
by a botanical key, based mainly on leaf characters.
See P.I. Nos. 6,773 to 6,823 for record of miscellaneous caprifigs introduced in 1901
from vicinity of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria, mostly without variety names.
The following description of caprifigs on the island of Malta is by J. Borg (1922):
A considerable proportion of seedlings, especially those originating from the white or light-colored
edible varieties, produce uneatable fruits; and when they produce several crops, they are called caprifigs,
and fruit may be used as such. However, the fruit of the true caprifigs is always more or less dry,
becoming soft at maturity, but never fleshy or luscious as the edible figs. A “dry” caprifig is essential for
the proper development of the Blastophaga, and therefore good sorts of caprifigs are always propagated
by cuttings or layers, or budded on seedlings. The two best-known caprifigs are the so-called white
caprifig (duccar abjad) and the red caprifig (duccar atimar). The white caprifig is that most frequently
met with. Its fruits are whitish green, with red scales at the orifice. The red caprifig is smaller, round, or
somewhat flattened, of a uniform, rusty greenish-red color it is “drier” than the white variety, and is
preferred whenever obtainable. A late variety of green caprifig, producing long fruits, which mature
their galls about three weeks later than the other sorts, is much valued for the caprification of late or
secondary crops of figs which otherwise would be lost.
Smyrna-type figs reach full maturity only as a result of pollination of the flowers and
the subsequent development of the ovules into fertile seeds. They have long been
grown in Asia Minor, Greece, North Africa, and Portugal, and it is in these countries
that varieties have gradually been selected for culture. The following list includes those
varieties which are named and described in publications available.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 343
prize offered by George C. Roeding for the best name for the variety as grown in
California. Trabut and Mann both report the variety unsuccessful in Algeria.
Trees vigorous; habit of growth upright (plate 1), with prominent nodal swellings on
older framework branches (plate 4). See Condit (1933, figs. 8, 10, 11; 1941a, figs. 15, 16).
Leaves above medium to large, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses deep, of medium width,
lower shallow; base truncate to shallowly cordate; upper margins shallowly crenate,
lower entire; upper surface dull; leaves on sucker wood with much narrower lobes and
deeper sinuses. (Plate 13.)
Breba crop fair in some seasons; called Yel Injur, or “wind figs,” in Turkey, according
to Hagan. Brebas large, pyriform, with prominent neck; color golden yellow; pulp
amber, almost seedless; flavor insipid.
Second-crop figs large, up to 2-1/2 inches in diameter and 2 inches from base to apex,
oblate-spherical; neck thick, short, and flattened; average weight 70 grams; stalk short;
ribs narrow, elevated, rather prominent; eye large, open (as illustrated by Condit,
1941a); scales chaffy, dingy straw color; surface somewhat glossy, with delicate bloom;
white flecks inconspicuous, masked by yellow; color golden yellow to light lemon
yellow, attractive; meat white, 1/8 inch thick; pulp amber to light strawberry; flavor
rich and sweet; quality excellent, both fresh and dried; seeds numerous. According to
Ozbek, the seeds of Sari Lop average 708 per gram in number. Season medium. Main
defects are large eye, and tendency to split in unfavorable weather. (Plates 8; 11; 12;
15, C.)
Scionto (syn. Fico Aggiunto). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Cultivated
in the vicinity of Brindisi. Like Dottato Bianco, it is eaten fresh and is used for drying,
but requires caprification. There is no breba crop.
Leaves large, generally 5-lobed. Figs medium; body spherical; neck prominent; stalk
very short; skin greenish yellow, with scattered white flecks; pulp white; flavor sweet,
very delicate.
Teratology common in this variety, with one fruit superimposed above another,
hence the term aggiunto, or “added.”
Snowden. An unidentified variety found on the place of P. W. Snowden, Modesto,
in 1922, and therefore named after him; other trees located at Escalon. Scions grafted in
a Kadota tree at Fresno in 1924 bore fruit for many years; young trees bore large figs of
excellent quality in 1953.
Tree vigorous; leaves above medium to large, mostly 3-lobed.
Breba crop none; main crop good. Figs large, up to 2-3/8 inches in diameter and
2-3/4 inches in length; average weight 93 grams; shape pyriform, body spherical; neck
prominent, curved and somewhat flattened; stalk short; ribs elevated, fairly prominent;
eye large, open; surface somewhat glossy, with delicate bloom; white flecks large,
scattered, conspicuous; color lemon yellow, attractive; meat white; pulp amber. Flavor
rich, sweet; quality excellent, both fresh and dried. Worthy of more extensive trial. Figs
inclined to split in unfavorable weather.
Sultanie. P.I. No. 6,465; a Damascus fig grown in Algeria before introduction into
the United States in 1901. Figs medium, yellow, white inside; splitting when ripe.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 345
open, 1/4 inch across; scales brown when mature; color green; pulp red; texture fine;
quality very good. One of the best for table use; equally good dried.
Amesas. Described and illustrated by Mauri (1942). Two different varieties are
found at Mechtras under this name, which means “dull.” Amesas E.A. Tree very
productive; leaves 5-lobed. Figs are small, globular, and green, with rose-colored pulp
that is insipid and ferments readily; quality of dried fruit poor. Amesas E.P. Tree with
leaves nonlobed or shallowly 3-lobed; figs small; stalk short; pulp pale rose, of fine
texture but tasteless.
Aranim-Amellal. Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939b, 1942), who reports that
Aranim is masculine for Taranimt (“reed”); but the exact connection between the word
and this variety of fig is not clear. Amellal means “white.” See also Blin (1942).
Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872) list Aranim as a variety not requiring caprification.
Tree of moderate vigor; leaves 5-lobed.
Figs medium, short-pyriform, about the same size and shape as those of Aranim-
Aberkane; stalk short; skin thin, parchmentlike, closely adherent to the meat; eye closed,
with greenish-white scales bordered brown; color green; pulp red; flavor sweet ; quality
very good. Defects are the thin skin and the tendency to split. Counts show an average
of 864 seeds for split fruits and 744 for nonsplit fruits.
Bardajic (syns. Bardajik, Bardakjik). Name from two Turkish words, bardak,
“pitcher,” and jik, “small,” the fruit resembling a water pitcher in general shape. See
accounts by Eisen (1901), Roeding (1903, 1914), Rixford (1918a), Nadir and Halit (1929),
Hagan (1929), Condit (1920b, 1947), and Ozbek (1949). A variety grown in coastal
districts near Smyrna, where residents and visitors become familiar with the early
morning cries of the peddler, “Bardajic! Bardajic!” as he calls attention to the fresh figs
carried in panniers on the back of a donkey.
Tree compact, spreading; leaves large, 5-lobed, with shallow sinuses.
Figs large near the coast, smaller in the interior, pyriform, with prominent neck; stalk
long, slender (short, according to Ozbek); ribs distinct; eye small; color green; white
flecks scattered, small; skin thin, checking crisscross at maturity; pulp scarlet; flavor
sweet. Quality excellent fresh, but not good for drying because of the dark, tough skin,
and red color of pulp.
Ozbek gives the average weight of Bardajic figs as 52 grams and the number of seeds
per gram as 1057. Experience with the Bardajic at Fresno California, has been
unsatisfactory, on account of splitting of the fruit on the tree.
Blowers. Described by Eisen (1901), and Rixford (1918a), as one of the varieties
imported by the Bulletin Company, San Francisco, in 1882, and first planted on the
place of R. B. Blowers, Woodland; never planted commercially, and probably lost. Figs
medium, globose; ribs prominent; color lemon yellow; pulp pink.
Castelhano Branco (syn. Euchário Branco). See account by Mello Leotte (1901), and
description with illustrations by Bobone (1932). The former states that the word
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 347
euchário is from the archaic eucha, “chest,” and caixa “case”; i.e., “fig of the case.” He
also gives Euchário Preto as a synonym; but Bobone points out distinctions in size,
color, and flavor. Both require caprification and produce a second crop only.
Castelhano figs are turbinate, rounded at apex; color green, obscurely tinted chestnut;
pulp carmine; flavor agreeable; quality fair. Season medium. According to Mello
Leotte, these figs, properly matured, are unrivaled in quality, and bring high prices in
the market.
Changelge (syn. Ghengelje). Listed by Nadir and Halit (1929), also by Condit and
Baskaya (1948), as a Turkish fig, well known to growers but not widely planted.
Chefaki. Described by Minangoin (1931) as a Smyrna-type fig from Hammamet,
Tunisia. Leaves large, 3- to 5-lobed; petiole short. Figs without distinct neck; skin thin,
glossy, pruinose, yellow in color; eye nearly closed; pulp red.
Cheker Injir (syns. Leker Injir, Sheker Injir, Seker). Described by Eisen (1901),
Roeding (1903), Condit (1947), and Ozbek (1949). The name signifies “sugar fig.” The
variety is grown on the island of Chios; also in the southern part of the Smyrna fig
district for home consumption. Of no particular value in California, either fresh or
dried.
Figs medium, oblate-spherical, with short neck; color greenish yellow; ribs distinct;
pulp dark strawberry in color; seeds small.
Ozbek gives the average weight of Cheker figs as 31 grams and the number of seeds
per gram as 1,179. It has the smallest seeds of any of the twelve described by Ozbek.
Choer (syn. Biskra). Collected at Biskra, Algeria, by W. T. Swingle in 1900, and
introduced by the United States Department of Agriculture as P.I. No. 6,480. (See P.I.
Inventory No. 10.)
Tree very vigorous; branches drooping. Leaves very large, nonlobed to 3- to 5-lobed;
upper surface dull; upper sinuses shallow and broad in 3-lobed leaf to deep and
moderately broad in 5-lobed leaf; middle lobe broad, spatulate, sometimes auricled;
base subcordate; margins crenate (plate 13). Leaves practically immune to mosaic, as
stated by Swingle (1928).
Figs large, up to 2-1/4 inches in diameter, turbinate, with very short, thick neck and
short stalk; many specimens triangular in cross section; average weight 62 grams;
surface dull, with delicate bloom; eye medium to large, open; color grass green to
greenish yellow; pulp strawberry; flavor strong; quality poor. Tests in California have
been unfavorable on account of poor quality of fruit and tendency to split. (Plate 14, B.)
Cueritesto (syn. Cesario). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). An
uncommon variety producing second-crop figs only, but in great abundance; ordinarily
caprified.
Leaves small, mostly 3-lobed; sinuses of medium depth. Figs below medium size,
spherical, without neck; color greenish yellow; skin not very thick, rather difficult to
peel; pulp light red; flavor somewhat pungent.
Djaferi. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gabès, Tunisia, as a variety requiring
caprification. Leaves small, 3-lobed, some with sinuses indistinct. Figs spherical, with
348 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
very short neck; ribs present; eye closed; color light green; pulp bright red.
Djebali. Two green figs were described under this name by Minangoin (1931). No.1,
from Gabès, Tunisia, is reported to yield well as the result of caprification. Figs small;
with spherical body and long, slender neck; color light green; pulp red; seeds
numerous. No.32, from Zarzis, requires caprification. Figs with indistinct neck; skin
thick, light green in color; pulp brown.
Fietta (syns. Jetta, Treccia). Described and illustrated by Guglielmi (1908), Vallese
(1909), and De Rosa (1911). Cultivated in the province of Lecce.
Leaves large, 5-lobed; sinuses deep. Breba crop none. Second crop prolific;
commonly caprified. Second-crop figs large, oblate-spherical, without neck; stalk short;
color greenish yellow; skin checking irregularly, thin, not easily peeled; pulp light red,
sweet, but somewhat acid; seeds abundant. Consumed both fresh and dried.
Gök Lop. Described by Condit and Baskaya (1948) and Ozbek (1949). Turkish name
signifies “green delicious.” Recommended for coastal districts of Smyrna with high
relative humidity.
Figs large; stalk short; eye open; color green, with light-strawberry pulp. When
dried, skin is lighter colored than that of Sari Lop, but sugar content is lower.
Ozbek gives the average weight of Gök Lop figs as 71 grams, and the number of
seeds per gram as 827.
Hilgard. Seedling No.153 from the Maslin orchard, Loomis; named in honor of E. W.
Hilgard; described by Rixford (1918a). Trees planted only for trial; variety probably
lost.
Figs medium, oblate, lemon yellow; eye open, with pink bracts; neck very short, or
none; pulp red; quality excellent. Fruits almost immune from splitting.
Isly. Described by Trabut (1901, 1904) as a new seedling fig suitable for drying. See
also Blin (1942). Tree vigorous, remarkably prolific, with large leaves. Figs large,
oblate, yellowish green; eye large, open; pulp red, sweet, rich; seeds fertile.
Jadi (syn. Iadi). Described by Minangoin (1931) from Hammamet, Tunisia. Leaves
medium, 5-lobed. Figs oblate-spherical, with short neck and narrow ribs; color greenish
yellow; pulp red. Caprification is reported to be necessary.
Kalamata (syn. Messenia). A variety imported by the University of California from
Athens, Greece, in 1930, and reported to be identical with the commercial fig of
Kalamata. Panos Th. Anagnostopoulos, Athens, reports in a letter dated March 22,
1953, that the Kalamata fig is the same as Sari Lop of Turkey. See account by Condit
(1924). Description is from figs produced at Riverside since 1933.
Figs medium, spherical to obovate; neck very short and thick; ribs not prominent; eye
large, open; surface somewhat glossy, with delicate bloom; white flecks large,
conspicuous; skin green, unattractive, often discoloring and checking crisscross at
maturity; pulp dark strawberry; flavor rich, sweet; quality good. Commercially inferior
because of poor skin color, dark pulp, and tendency to split.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 349
Karayaprak (syn Dülekgazi). Described by Hagan (1929), Condit and Baskaya (1948),
and Ozbek (1949). Grown in some parts of the Smyrna fig district on account of its
resistance to fruit diseases and insects. Figs smaller and skin coarser and thicker than
that of Sari Lop; used both fresh and dried, mostly in homes.
Leaves mostly 5-lobed, but many nonlobed, unusually dark green. Figs medium,
oblate; eye small; color yellowish green; pulp light strawberry.
Ozbek gives the average weight as 43 grams, and the number of seeds per gram as
839.
Kassaba. Described by Eisen (1901), Roeding (1903, 1914), Rixford (1918a), and
Condit (1947). Introduced into California in 1882 by the Bulletin Company, San
Francisco, but never grown commercially.
Trees vigorous, upright; widely scattered among Sari Lop trees in the Meander
Valley; also planted as a border tree at Kassaba. Leaves 3- or 5-lobed, medium,
somewhat glossy above; upper sinuses shallow and narrow, lower very shallow, or
none; base truncate to broadly cordate; margins serrate.
Figs large, turbinate, or sometimes oblate; neck thick, short; stalk short; ribs fairly
prominent and elevated; eye medium, smaller than that of Sari Lop; surface dull; color
pale green; pulp strawberry; flavor rich, sweet; quality very good. Season late. Dried
figs readily distinguishable by the dark-red pulp. (Plate 15, A.)
Khadir. Described by Minangoin (1931) as a Smyrna-type fig from Dra Tamar,
Tunisia. Leaves variable, some small and heart-shaped, others larger, deeply 3-lobed;
petiole long. Figs small, spherical, without neck; skin of fine texture, green in color; eye
closed; pulp red.
Kouffi Vert. Described by Minangoin (1931) as a Smyrna-type fig from Kalaâ Srira,
Tunisia. Leaves medium, 5-lobed, lower lobes not clearly defined. Figs large, sessile;
skin thick; color light green, darker on ribs; pulp dark red.
Lebi. Described and figured by Ozbek (1949). Found occasionally in the gardens of
the Meander Valley. Not a popular variety, either fresh or dried, but notable because of
its resistance to cold.
Leaves medium, generally 5-lobed; lobes somewhat auricled; base truncate. Figs
medium, oblate; average weight 31 grams; eye small, open; scales pink; skin yellow,
finely pubescent, medium thick, easy to peel; pulp light red; flavor fiat. Number of
seeds per gram, 861.
Madoui. Described by Minangoin (1931) as a caprified fig from Dra Tamar, Tunisia.
Leaves large, 5-lobed; petiole long. Figs small, oblate, without neck; eye closed; skin
thick, green in color; pulp hollow at the center, bright red.
Malaki Blanc (P.I. No. 6,464). A Damascus fig, grown in Algeria before introduction
into the United States in 1901. Figs medium, yellow, with red pulp; not splitting when
ripe.
Mamari (P.I. No. 6,463). Same source as Malaki Blanc. Figs medium, yellow, red
inside; splitting when ripe.
350 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Tabelout. Briefly described by Trabut (1904, 1923), and Bun (1942), as Thabelout;
described and illustrated by Mann (1939b, 1942). Name from belout, “small gland,”
probably on account of the small size of the fruit.
Tree rather vigorous, productive; leaves 3-lobed, often nonlobed. Figs small, short-
pyriform; stalk short; eye medium; color green; pulp red; flavor subacid. Quality good
fresh; too small for commercial market.
Tabelout (large-fruited). Described and illustrated by Mann (1939b, 1942), as a
variety at Tizi-Rached. Similar to Tabelout, but with larger fruits. Figs of inferior
quality.
Tadefouit. Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939b, 1942). Grown at Tizi-Rached,
where it is sometimes erroneously called Imlloui. Eisen (1901) lists “Thadhefouith” as a
white fig from Kabylia, which does not require caprification.
Tree moderately vigorous. Leaves generally 3-lobed. Figs short-pyriform, with neck
very inconspicuous; stalk short; eye medium; color green; pulp red, sweet. Quality
good, both fresh and dried.
Taharit. Described and illustrated by Mann (1939b, 1942). One variety called Tarlit
at Tamazirt, and another known as Taidelt at Sidi-Aich, are both very similar to Taharit.
Tree vigorous. Leaves 5-lobed. Figs oblate-spherical, without neck; stalk short; eye
open; color yellowish green; pulp light red; flavor mild. Quality good fresh, but
mediocre dried.
Takourchit. Described and illustrated by Mauri (1942). Trees found near Sidi-Aich,
where this variety is sometimes called “Azigzaou.” Tree moderately vigorous, erect.
Leaves 3- to 5-lobed. Figs medium, globular; eye large, open; color light green; pulp
red.
Tameriout (syns. Taamrouth, Thaamriout, Bougiotte, and erroneously, Imlloui).
Described and illustrated by Mann (1939b, 1942). Name from Ait Aamar, near Bougie,
where the variety originated. Thaamriout, briefly described and illustrated by Mazières
(1920), and by Trabut (1904, 1923), as very common near Tizi-Ouzou, may be the same
variety. See also Bun (1942) and Montagnac (1952). The bulk of dried figs at Bougie
consists of Tameriout; it is later in maturing and more sensitive to drought and heat
than Taranimt. Successfully introduced into California in 1950 as P.I. No. 153,693.
Tree vigorous, erect. Leaves 5-lobed.
Figs pyriform, with prominent neck; stalk short; eye medium; color light green; meat
thin, white; pulp red, very sweet. Quality good, fresh or dried.
Taranimt (syns. Thaaranimt, Tagouaout). See description and illustration by Trabut
(1904, 1923). Descriptions by Mazières (1920), Mauri (1939b, 1942), and Blin (1942). See
also Montagnac (1952). Name signifies “reed,” possibly because the figs are dried on
reed trays in the mountains of Kabylia. It is the principal fig of Tizi-Ouzou; most of the
orchards in the Sebaou Valley are planted to it, as the yield is generally better than from
Tameriout; it is somewhat earlier in maturing than the latter, but more exacting in
caprification. Introduced into California recently as P.I. No. 153,694. Hanoteau and
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 353
Euscaire (syn. Euscaire Preto). Introduced as P.I. No. 18,851 in 1906, with the
Chiswick collection of English figs; listed but not described by Eisen (1901); requires
caprification in California.
Tree upright, open; terminal buds brown. Leaves medium, glossy above; upper
sinuses of medium depth and width, lower sinuses shallow; base cordate, sometimes
truncate or even decurrent; margins wavy, coarsely crenate; texture harsh, thick. (Plate
13.)
Figs medium, pyriform, with a prominent neck; average weight 40 grams stalk thick,
up to 1/2 inch long; ribs narrow, elevated; eye medium, open; scales violet; white flecks
large, conspicuous; color black; skin checking lengthwise, as shown by Condit (1941 a,
fig. 8, A); pulp amber; flavor rich, sweet. Quality excellent fresh, but inferior and small
in size when dried. Of no commercial importance. (Plate 15, B.)
Hamriti. Described by Minangoin (1931) as a variety requiring caprification at Kalaâ
Srira, Tunisia.
Leaves medium, 3- to 5-lobed; sinuses deep, sometimes closed. Figs with short, thick
neck; skin thin; eye almost closed; color dark violet, with bands almost black; pulp
amber.
Scancaniso (syn. Fico della Villa of Cavolini). Described and illustrated by Vallese
(1909); probably the same variety described by Guglielmi (1908) as Scansaniso. Planted
more commonly than Turco; occasionally produces a breba crop in favorable seasons;
caprification generally practiced.
Leaves large, 3- to 5-lobed. Figs large, broadly turbinate; neck and stalk both short;
color rosy violet; skin checking; pulp whitish. Highly esteemed for fresh consumption.
Bardakjik Black. Described by Eisen (1901) as a black fig of Asia Minor, where it is
considered one of the best for fresh consumption.
Barli. Two apparently different Smyrna-type varieties, described as Barli by
Minangoin (1931). One, from Dra Tamar, Tunisia, has small, elongated figs, with
reddish skin and light-red pulp. The other, from Monastir, produces figs that are
oblate, ribbed, and without stalk; skin thin, light green; pulp red; seeds numerous.
Belmandil. (syn. Cara Lisa). Described by Mello Leotte (1901). Name comes from
bello, “fine,” and mandil (roupa), “linen,” in reference to the texture of the skin.
Specimens collected at Loulé, Portugal, and described by Bobone (1932) under the name
Cara Lisa, were very similar, and probably identical to Belmandil.
Breba crop none; second crop requires caprification. Second-crop figs globular,
without neck, smooth; stalk short; color green tinged with violet; pulp carmine; flavor
sweet and agreeable; quality good.
Besoul-el-Khadem. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) and by Minangoin
(1931) as Bezoult Rhadem from Gabès, and by Valdeyron and Crossa-Raynaud (1950) as
Bezoul-el-Khadem. The last authors state that this name probably includes several
different clones, having figs of similar shape and of violet color. Leaves 3- to 5-lobed, or
often nonlobed. Figs medium; skin thick, violet in color; pulp dark red, hollow at
center.
Minangoin also described Bezoult Rhadem or Bou Defi from Tarzis as a dark-violet
fig, with pomegranate-red pulp. Furthermore, he recorded a variety of the same name
from Kalaâ Srira, producing large, pyriform figs, violet in color, with red pulp. The
latter requires caprification.
Biddin-el-Brel. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Dra Tamar, Tunisia, as a
Smyrna-type fig. Tree productive. Leaves small, 3-lobed, or sometimes nonlobed. Figs
with long, slender neck; eye small; skin thin; color reddish violet, with thin lines nearly
black; pulp red; seeds numerous.
Bou-Ang. Described by Minangoin (1931) as a variety requiring caprification at
Gabès, Tunisia. Leaves large, 3-lobed; upper sinuses very deep; petiole slender. Figs
with short neck; eye closed; color greenish yellow, tinged with violet; pulp red.
Bou-Harrak. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Ras-el-Djebel, Tunisia as a
Smyrna-type fig of moderate quality. Figs large, somewhat oblate, with short neck; skin
thin, dark violet; pulp red.
Castelhano Preto (syns. Euchário Preto, Castelhano da Rocha). Described by Mello
Leotte (1901) and Bobone (1932); the latter illustrates three different forms, as grown at
Cacela and Silves in Algarve.
Figs turbinate to pyriform; stalk up to 1/2 inch long; color dark violet; pulp dark
chestnut, coarse, sweet; quality good.
Habtir. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929), and Minangoin (1931), as a fig
deep violet or black in color, small to medium in size neck not distinct; eye nearly
closed; pulp dark red. According to Minangoin, it requires caprification.
Kara Injir. Described by Hagan (1929) as a black fig, grown in northern and eastern
Turkey. Fruit rather dry, thick-skinned, and generally poor in quality.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 357
Leaves small, generally 3-lobed, with some 5-lobed or even nonlobed; sinuses deep,
open. Figs below medium, 1-1/2 by 1-3/8 inches, pyriform; stalk practically none; skin
very thin, light brown in color; pulp red.
Turco. Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909). Trees large, with small, 5-lobed
leaves; not commonly found. Figs below medium, ovoid; stalk short; color violet; pulp
red.
Zafrani. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Monastir, Tunisia. Leaves medium, 3-
lobed; upper sinuses deep, closed; petiole short. Figs small; neck short; skin rather
thick, dark violet in color; ribs present; pulp light red. An attractive fruit, requiring
caprification.
The following varieties, listed and very briefly described by Trabut (1904, 1923), may
be of the Smyrna type: Timlouit, Thaaoust, Thaharchou, Thazgouart, and Thaarlit.
Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872) list five kinds from Kabylia, believed to require
caprification: Thar’animt, El Hadj, Abouzouggar, Mezzith, and Thazaicht.
San Pedro-type figs combine the fruit-setting peculiarities of both the Smyrna and the
Common type on one tree in a single annual cycle. First crop figs (brebas) are of the
Common type, and develop parthenocarpically. Second-crop figs are of the Smyrna
type, the syconia dropping unless stimulated by pollination and fertilization of the
long-styled flowers. All of the twenty-one varieties included in the list of
360 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
San Pedro-type figs bear a more or less abundant crop of brebas. Since parthenocarpic
development of second-crop figs is not a fixed character, the inclusion of certain
varieties or the omission of others may be questioned. An example of a perplexing
variety is the King, which, without caprification, drops practically all of the main crop
at Riverside, but matures a large percentage in coastal climates. Drap d’Or is included
in the San Pedro group, although at Riverside a small number of second-crop figs reach
maturity without the stimulus of caprification. The following varieties are divided into
two groups, based on the color of skin and pulp.
Cachôpeiro Branco (probable synonyms are Lampo Branco, Vindimo Branco, Santa
Catarina, Roma Branco). Described by Mello Leotte (1901) and Bobone (1932);
illustrated also by the latter. Cachopo, described by Mello Leotte, may also be the same,
although he reported the second crop set fruit without caprification. Brebas mature in
Algarve from the middle of May to the end of June, while the second crop ripens in the
middle of August.
Brebas pyriform to turbinate, with thick neck and short stalk; color greenish yellow.
Second-crop figs oblate-spherical, without neck; pulp rosy chestnut; texture coarse;
quality good.
Colombro (syns. Columbo, Colombra, Colummone, Colombone, Columbaro, and
probably Colombo Pazzo). Described by Semmola (1845, with illustration) by
Gasparrini (1845) as Colombro; by Savastano (1885) as Colombo; by Vallese (1909) as
Colummone, with illustration of leaves; by Siniscalchi (1911) as Columbro; and by
Donno (1951b) as Columbaro. According to Vallese, the names Columbo, Colombone,
etc., are probably applied to different varieties with a profuse breba crop, commonly
called “colummi” or “colombi.” Savastano stated that caprification is indispensable for
Colombo; Vallese, however, expressed doubt in the matter, since in some districts the
practice of caprification is extended to all varieties, whether they require it or not. De
Rosa (1911) found that Colombo Pazzo required caprification Donno describes the two
crops of Columbaro in detail, but does not mention caprification. Colombro is grown in
central Lecce Province and near Cape Leuca.
The tree has light-green terminal buds and mostly 5-lobed leaves; see Donno (1951a)
for account of buds and twigs.
Brebas not described by Vallese, but reported by Savastano to be small, spherical,
green in color. According to Donno (1951b) the brebas are large, pyriform, light green
in color; pulp light red.
Second-crop figs (after Donno) medium, 2 by 2 inches, spherical; stalk up to 3/8 inch
in length; eye mostly open; ribs numerous, elevated; skin color light green; pulp red.
Mostly consumed fresh.
Gentile (syns. Gentilla, Figue d’Or, Fico d’Oro, Tiburtina of Pliny, Ficus carica
pulchella Risso). Described by Porta (1592), Tanara (1651), Aldrovandi (1668), Miller
(1768), Hanbury (1770), Christ (1812), Forsyth (1803), Gallesio (1817), Risso (1826),
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 361
Lindley (1831), Holley (1854), Dochnahl (1855), Sauvaigo (1889, 1894), Eisen (1896, 1897,
1901), Bois (1928), Condit (1921b, 1947), Evreinoff (1947), and Tamaro (1948). Illustrated
by Eisen (1901) and Condit (1921b).
According to Gallesio, the Gentile fig is the same variety recorded by Pliny as
Tiburtina. Aldrovandi called it Gentilium. It was highly praised by Gallesio, who said
it well deserved the name it bears, Gentile, or “delicate”; he added that he knew of no
other variety which produced brebas equal to it in beauty, delicacy, and flavor. Figs of
the second crop, according to Gallesio, reached a certain size, then shriveled and
dropped. Sauvaigo reported that the Gentile tree bears two crops, but that figs of the
second crop are not edible, since they drop before they mature. Trees are commonly
found from Naples to Toscana and along the Italian Riviera. The Gentile described by
Simonet is regarded by them as identical with Dottato.
According to Eisen, two cuttings of the Gentile were found at San Leandro,
California, in 1852. They were planted in a nursery, and one later developed into a
large tree. The original plant died, but a cutting from it, planted on the Kimball place,
1859 Hoover Street, Hayward, is still growing and producing brebas each year. Other
trees were reported by Eisen at Alameda and at Knights Ferry. P.I. No. 18,899 of the
Chiswick collection is listed as Gentile, but no California records have been located as to
behavior of trees from that introduction. In coastal districts, the Gentile is similar in
external fruit characters to the King, but is much inferior to that variety in color and
texture of pulp and in eating quality. Gentile is not recommended for dooryard
planting, since trees of certain other varieties bear not only brebas but also main-crop
figs without caprification.
The tree is vigorous, and reaches large size, with lower branches drooping. Leaves
are large, and 3-lobed. Description of brebas is after that of Eisen, and from specimens
produced by the tree at Hayward.
Breba crop fair to good; fruits above medium to large; body spherical, with short,
thick neck; stalk very short; ribs not prominent; eye large, protruding, open, scales rose-
colored; surface glossy, with delicate bloom; white flecks prominent, numerous; color
green; pulp amber to light strawberry; flavor sweet, fairly rich; seeds few; quality good.
No description of caprified second-crop figs is available.
Comparison of the fruits and fruiting habits of Gentile and White San Pedro leads
to the conclusion that these two Italian varieties are very similar, and that they may be
identical.
Khdari. Described and illustrated by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as found in all
parts of Palestine, where it is grown especially for the fresh fruit market. The name
signifies “green.”
Trees are very distinctive in shape, with dark-green leaves.
The “daffour” (breba) crop is exceptionally good; brebas large, up to 3 inches in
diameter, oblate-spherical; neck missing; stalk short; eye open, with brownish scales;
skin thin, green; pulp light strawberry, very juicy; flavor sweet and rich. Not used for
drying.
King. The exact origin and identity of the King fig have not been determined.
About 1930, cuttings from a fig tree growing near Madera, California, were planted by
362 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Sisto Pedrini, Western Evergreen Company, at Los Altos and at San Francisco. The
young trees produced such excellent fruit that hundreds of plants were propagated and
distributed in Pacific Coast states and elsewhere by the King Fig Plantation, San
Francisco. See account by Brooks and Olmo (1949). The King tree is exceptionally
prolific of the breba crop, which often sets three to five or more fruits close together,
somewhat like the crop of certain caprifigs. At Riverside, and in most other inland
districts, the majority of second-crop figs shrivel and drop for lack of caprification, a
fact which places this variety in the San Pedro group of figs. In cool, coastal sections, a
fair percentage of the crop matures by parthenocarpy, as explained elsewhere by Condit
(1950).
Of all the varieties fruiting in the collection at Riverside, the King is unexcelled for
the production of brebas. Few home owners, however, have found the King
satisfactory, because of the severe dropping of the second crop and lack of knowledge
as to the cultural methods most likely to give best results with this variety. Branches of
King trees should not be cut back heavily in winter, as this removes the fruit buds
which normally produce a breba crop. A judicious thinning out of the older wood
occasionally would seem to be the best procedure. The following description is of trees
and fruit grown at Riverside since 1941.
Tree moderately vigorous. Leaves medium, 3- to 5-lobed; base subcordate; lateral
sinuses broad, shallow; upper surface somewhat glossy, rugose; margins shallowly
crenate.
Brebas above medium to large, short-pyriform, often oblique, with or without short,
thick neck; average weight 88 grams; stalk short; ribs present, but not prominent; white
flecks variable, large and widely scattered in some, small and numerous in others; eye
large, scales chaffy or straw colored, semi-erect; color green; bloom prominent; meat
thin, white; pulp strawberry; flavor rich; quality excellent. (Plate 16, A.)
Second-crop figs uncaprified, medium, with or without short neck; color greenish
yellow; pulp amber to very light strawberry; seeds few, tender, hollow. Caprified figs
with stalk very short and no neck; average weight 45 grams; color dark green; pulp
dark strawberry; flavor rich; quality good. (Plates 12; 16, B.)
Noce. Described by De Rosa (1911). The tree has slender branches, and large, 5-
lobed leaves. It produces brebas rather abundantly, but the fruit characters are not
given. Second-crop caprified figs are globular; stalk very short; color green; eye scales
rose; pulp red; seeds large and numerous. Matures August and September.
Pietri. P.I. No. 102,018, received from Morocco in 1933 as Pietri, and P.I. No. 101,723,
from Sochi, Black Sea district, as Violet Delicate, are identical at Riverside. These are
both very similar to Blanquette (P.I. No. 102,007), also from Morocco, but originally in a
collection of varieties from Lérida Province of Spain. All three show the characteristic
bearing habit of the San Pedro type.
Breba crop fair; figs medium or above, pyriform, with prominent, thick neck and
short stalk; eye large; color lettuce green; pulp strawberry; quality fair. Very inferior to
King in productiveness, size of fruit, and quality.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 363
Second—crop figs medium, oblate-spherical, without neck; stalk short; color green;
pulp strawberry, gelatinous in texture; seeds fertile; quality fair to poor.
San Giovanni (syn. Santa Scianni). Described by De Rosa (1911) as an Italian variety,
producing some brebas and requiring caprification for the second crop.
The figs are spherical to oblate; size medium, 2 inches in diameter and 1-5/8 inches in
length; stalk very short; eye medium, scales rose-colored; skin color green; pulp light
red; seeds large and numerous. Usually consumed fresh. Not recommended for
general planting.
San Pedro (syns. San Pedro White, White San Pedro, Apple, Saint Peter). Described
by West (1882), Eisen (1885, 1896, 1897, 1901), Fancher Creek Nursery catalogue, Fresno
(1885—1886), Colby (1894), California Nursery catalogue, Niles, (1889—1890), Starnes
(1903, 1907, the second with Monroe, both with illustrations), Roeding (1914), and
Condit (1921b, 1947). See also Condit (1941a, fig. 2, 1).
The identity and synonymy of San Pedro with a European variety have not been
established. According to Eisen (1901, p.65), “F. Pohndorff, then of Niles or vicinity,
imported the White San Pedro under the name of Breba from Spain and distributed it in
this country in 1883 or 1884.” On the other hand, Milco stated in 1884 that he had
imported the San Pedro from Dalmatia about eleven years previously. It is not the same
as San Piero, described by Gallesio, nor San Pietro, both of which are treated elsewhere
in this monograph.
Since about 1885, San Pedro has been widely distributed in California, but nowhere
has it achieved commercial importance, despite the advertisement of one California
nursery that “as a table fig this one is unsurpassed, and will exclude all others on the
market.” It was grown and tested at the California Experiment Stations, and Colby
reported analyses of the fruit grown at Fresno in 1893. The tree that grew at Parlier,
Fresno County, for many years, and that was erroneously reported in the American Fruit
Grower, November, 1929, as the largest fig tree in America, was of this variety; not of the
Adriatic, as stated (plate 5). Trees of San Pedro have been fruiting in the collection at
Riverside since 1930, and the following account is based on the behavior of this variety
during the intervening years.
The tree is rather open, with drooping branches; terminal buds are green. Leaves
variable in size and lobing, mostly 3- or 5-lobed; surface somewhat glossy; upper
sinuses of medium depth and width, lower very shallow, broad; base shallowly
subcordate to truncate; margins coarsely and shallowly crenate.
Breba crop good; figs above medium to large, turbinate, with prominent, thick neck,
or sometimes spherical without neck; average weight 78 grams; stalk short; ribs fairly
prominent; white flecks variable, conspicuous on some specimens, few on others; eye
large, scales straw color, erect; surface glossy, with delicate bloom; color yellowish
green; meat white; pulp amber, tinged with strawberry; flavor moderately rich; quality
fair to good. (Plate 17, A.)
Second-crop figs medium to large, up to 2 inches in diameter and about the same
364 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
in length, spherical or oblate, with short stalk; neck variable, present and prominent, or
missing; average weight 58 grams; ribs broad, prominent; eye large, open, but internally
closed by scales; surface glossy; bloom fairly heavy; white flecks large, scattered,
conspicuous; skin thick, rubbery in texture; color green to yellowish green; meat white,
thick; pulp strawberry; seeds fertile, numerous; texture gelatinous; flavor insipid, flat;
quality fair to poor. Fruit inclined to split when nearing full maturity. Of little value,
either fresh or dried. (Plate 17, B.)
San Vito (syn. Santu Vitu). Described by Donno (1951a, 1951b) as a variety of Lecce
Province. Valued mostly for its production of brebas; second crop requires
caprification.
Trees have green terminal buds, and mostly 5-lobed leaves. Brebas medium, 2 by 2
inches, spherical, or sometimes ovoid; eye open, scales light yellow; skin color dark
green; pulp light red. Second-crop figs below medium, oblate; eye open; ribs
numerous; color light green; white flecks scattered, variable in size; pulp light red.
Buino. Described by Portale (1910) as a variety producing only a breba crop. Brebas
rather large, spherical; stalk short; color dark violet; pulp watery, but agreeable in
flavor. Consumed fresh.
Carvalhal. Described by Mello Leotte (1901). Name refers to a fig of the Carvalhal
estate. Tree producing abundantly first and second crops, the latter being artificially
caprified.
Leaves 3-lobed, with violet stipules. Brebas large, pyriform; skin violet; pulp rose-
colored. Second-crop figs smaller, globose, of same color as brebas.
Castle Kennedy (syn. Kennedy). Described by Fowler (1865, 1866), Hogg (1866), K.
(1873), J. S. W. (1873), Watts (1890), Barron (1891), Massey (1893), Simon-Louis (1895),
Norwich (1898), Eisen (1901, after Hogg), Ward (1904), Starnes and Monroe (1907),
Reboul (1908), Brotherston (1920), E. A. Bunyard (1925), Davis (1928), Burger and De
Wet (1931), and Preston (1951).
A color illustration of Ficus carica kennedyensis Hort. is given in L’Illustration
Horticole, vol. 13 (ser. 2, vol. 3), pl. 476. 1866. A writer in the Gardener’s Chronicle,
November 19, 1864, observed that Messrs. Lawson and Son were to distribute the Castle
Kennedy fig, which had been exhibited in Scotland and had obtained an award from
the Edinburgh Horticultural Society. An anonymous account in 1865 (Florist and
Pomologist, p.141) stated that this variety had then existed at Castle Kennedy for nearly
a century; but how it came there or what was its origin were matters on which there
was no reliable information. It was believed to be quite distinct from any other variety
in cultivation in England. Archibald Fowler, who grew this fig at Castle Kennedy,
along with Brunswick and Brown Turkey, also maintained that it was distinct from both
varieties. Several reports indicate that the trees are poor producers; but on the contrary,
Hogg stated, “The tree is an abundant bearer.” A writer of 1873, signed simply as “K.,”
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 365
as Ronde Violette Hâtive, and trees were planted for trial at various experiment stations
in this state and in Arizona. At the Tulare, California, station, it was reported to be one
of the most promising commercial sorts under tests. P.I. No. 18,912 of the Chiswick
collection was labeled Dauphine. Another one of the same collection, P.I. No. 18,873,
labeled Adam, was found to be the same as Dauphine, both in tree and in fruit. A
variety introduced from France by Felix Gillet, Nevada City, as Pagaudière, has also
proved at Riverside to be identical with Dauphine, although Eisen described it as a
reddish-yellow fig.
Trees were under trial at the Government Date Garden, Indio, before 1926, and
several growers in the Coachella Valley obtained cuttings. From one small commercial
orchard, the fresh figs were sent to market under the name “Superba.” No other
commercial plantings have been made in California, as Dauphine can hardly compete
successfully with other black figs such as Franciscana (Mission) for fresh-fruit shipping,
and its quality dried is very inferior. Trees have fruited at Fresno since 1924, and at
Riverside since 1931.
In California, trees of Dauphine drop all fruits of the second crop unless caprification
is practiced.
Tree vigorous, upright; outer branches drooping; terminal dormant buds green,
shading to brown or violet. Leaves medium to large, 3- to 5-lobed; upper surface
somewhat glossy; upper sinuses of medium depth and width, lower sinuses shallow
and broad; base subcordate; margins coarsely crenate. Description of fruit is from
specimens at Riverside, in comparison with the account by Simonet.
Breba crop generally good; fruit large, 2-1/2 by 2-1/2 inches, turbinate, with or
without a short, broad neck; average weight 92 grams; stalk up to 1/4 inch long; ribs
broad, slightly elevated, more deeply colored than body; eye large, protruding, open,
scales violet; skin of firm texture, resistant; surface glossy, with white flecks numerous
and conspicuous; bloom rather heavy, pruinose; color greenish violet in the shade to
violet-purple on exposed side, shading to green toward the stalk; meat white, almost
1/4 inch thick; pulp light strawberry; seeds large, fairly numerous. Flavor fairly rich,
but lacking distinctive fig character. Quality fair to good; especially good for shipping
fresh. (Plate 18, A.)
Second-crop figs much the same as brebas, except for smaller size; shape oblate-
spherical; pulp gelatinous with fertile seeds; average weight 70 grams; quality poor;
(Plate 18, B.)
Drap d'Or (syn. Royal Vineyard). The identity of Drap d’Or is in doubt. If it is
regarded by French confectioners as one of the best figs for crystallized and glacé fruit,
as stated by Eisen, why should the variety not be described in French publications? The
only descriptions found are those of Eisen (1897, 1901), Barron (1891), Starnes and
Monroe (1907), and of Woodroof and Bailey (1931). A variety was grown and tested
under the name Drap d’Or at the California Experiment Stations from 1891 to 1895;
source of the trees was probably the California Nursery Company, Niles, since that
nursery imported trees from England in 1883. According to Shinn (1893), Drap d’Or
did well at the Tulare station, and in 1914 he included it in the list of varieties
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 367
generally cultivated. On dooryard trees fruited in various parts of California, the breba
crop has been fair to good, but the second crop is small unless caprification is practiced.
P.I. No. 18,838 of the Chiswick collection, listed as Peau Dure, is probably the same
variety, as the fruiting habit at Fresno and Riverside is similar to that of the trees just
described. Brebas conform closely in characters to the description given by Eisen, and
to his illustration.
Royal Vineyard was described and illustrated in color by Barron (1871) as a new fig
of sterling merit, “one of the very finest figs yet brought into cultivation.” It was named
for the nursery of J. and C. Lee, Hammersmith, England, where the variety was found
without a label. Later descriptions were by Hyde (1877) and Barron (1891). P.I. No.
18,849 of the Chiswick collection is labeled Royal Vineyard; it fruited at Niles,
California, and was described and also illustrated by Eisen (1901).
The tree of Drap d’Or has an open habit of growth, with branches somewhat
drooping; terminal buds green. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy above, light green in
color, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth and width, lower sinuses
shallow; lower lobes sometimes auricled; base subcordate to truncate; margins coarsely
crenate. The following description is from fruits grown at Riverside since 1930.
Breba crop small; fruits large, pyriform, with prominent curved neck; ribs prominent,
rendering the surface more or less corrugated, much like that of Pied de Bœuf; eye
somewhat depressed, with pink scales; color light coppery bronze, attractive; pulp light
strawberry; flavor sweet and rich; seeds few. Eating quality excellent, but figs are too
soft and perishable for fresh-fruit market.
Caprified figs of the second crop medium to large, pyriform, decidedly oblique;
average weight 66 grams; neck prominent, rather thick and somewhat curved; stalk
from 1/2 to 1/4 inch long; ribs prominent; eye open, scales pinkish; color reddish
brown to violet-brown, deeper at apex and on exposed side; pulp strawberry; flavor
rich; quality good. Crop is small when caprification is not practiced, as a major
percentage of the figs shrivel and drop when immature.
Uncaprified figs medium, pyriform, with prominent neck and long, slender stalk;
surface corrugated by raised ribs; eye medium, open, scales rose red; color bronze; meat
thick, white; pulp hollow at center, light strawberry, texture dry; quality very poor.
(Plates 9; 24, C.)
Fracazzano Rosso (syn. Ficazzano). Second-crop figs described and illustrated by
Vallese (1909); figs of both crops described by De Rosa (1911), who states that
caprification is necessary. Ficazzano, described by Portale 1910), is treated by De Rosa
as synonymous with Fracazzano Rosso.
Leaves large, mostly 5-lobed.
Brebas large, ovoid; color violet, shading to dark green toward the base; pulp rose-
colored; seeds few and small.
Second-crop figs turbinate to obovate, above medium; neck none; stalk very short;
eye medium, surrounded by a yellowish aureole, scales violet; color rosy violet, light
green toward the stalk; pulp red; seeds large; flavor sweet. Normally preferred fresh.
368 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Pied de Bœuf, but found it very good dried at Antibes, France. The other descriptions
leave one in doubt as to the specific crop, but it is probable that both Hogg and Barron
have considered the breba crop only, as a second crop of figs is not commonly produced
in England. The slight attention given to this variety by horticultural writers is likely
due to the fact that second-crop figs mostly drop unless caprification-is practiced. The
late Leroy Nickel, of Menlo Park, California, obtained cuttings of Pied de Bœuf from
England, and donated wood for the Riverside collection in 1927. Since that time it has
proved to be a promising variety for fresh fruit brebas and for caprified figs of the main
crop. Its behavior at Riverside has been better than in the cooler climate of Los Angeles.
Tree and fruit characters are very much like those of Drap d’Or, but the two are
regarded in this publication as distinct varieties.
Pied de Bœuf trees are slow-growing and densely branched, with terminal buds
green in color. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy above, mostly 5-lobed, the middle
lobe broadly spatulate; upper sinuses of medium depth and width, lower sinuses
shallow, basal sinuses narrow; base cordate; margins coarsely crenate. The following
description is based on notes made of figs produced during fourteen fruiting seasons.
Breba crop fair to good; figs oblique-pyriform; size large, up to 2-1/4 inches in
diameter and 3-1/2 inches in length; average weight 79 grams; neck prominent, often
curved, and up to 1 inch long; stalk slender, 1/2 to 1 inch long; ribs very prominent, the
surface of the fruit therefore corrugated; eye above medium, scales rose to violet-brown;
skin tender, waxy or glossy in appearance, with bloom fairly prominent; white flecks
scattered, more or less concealed by body coloration; color Hessian brown, shading to
green or light brown on neck; meat white, tinged with pink; pulp light strawberry,
slightly hollow at the center, texture rather coarse; quality good. Excellent in
appearance, but not well adapted to fresh-fruit shipping on account of tender skin and
ribbed surface. (Plate 23, A.)
Second-crop caprified figs oblique-pyriform, above medium to large, up to 2 inches
broad and 3 inches long; neck short and thick, or up to 1 inch long; average weight 63
grams; stalk slender, often curved, up to 1 inch long, sometimes enlarged or swollen
toward the apex; ribs elevated, prominent; white flecks scattered, fairly conspicuous;
eye large, open, scales violet; skin somewhat glossy, tender checking at maturity; color
chocolate brown to mahogany red, attractive; meat white; pulp dark strawberry; flavor
rich and sweet; quality excellent.
Uncaprified figs light in weight; center hollow; pulp amber; quality poor. (Plates 9;
14, C). See also Condit (1941a, fig. 2, R).
Figs of the Common type develop parthenocarpically, and do not usually require the
stimulus of pollination to bring the syconia to maturity. Some common figs, such as
Barnissotte and Verdal, drop all or nearly all the fruit buds of the first crop but mature a
good second crop. Others, such as Franciscana and Dottato, have practically complete
370 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Figs of second or main crop generally on wood of current season, and in axil of a leaf.
Seeds, if present, infertile or hollow unless caprification has occurred.
I. Color of fruit various shades of green or yellow. (Plate 8.)
Figs striped or banded lengthwise, with green and yellow alternating........................................Panachée
Figs not conspicuously striped, more or less uniformly colored.
Pulp white or amber.
Seeds large, conspicuous; surface dull.......................................................................................Blanche
Seeds inconspicuous or undeveloped.
Stalk swollen or prominently enlarged toward body of fruit;
many figs dropping when small............................................................................Angélique
Stalk not swollen; few figs drop when small; in cool seasons or
climates meat is violet-colored next to skin.............................................................Dottato
Pulp various shades of red.
Neck not present, or indistinct.
Stalk short and thick, seldom over 1/4 inch long.
Size above medium to large.
Shape short-turbinate, with broad apex; terminal dormant
buds brownish; lobes of leaves broad.......................................................Genoa
Shape long-turbinate, with base gradually contracting
into the semblance of a neck; terminal buds green;
lobes of leaves narrow........................................................................San Pietro
Size medium; eye scales dark to rose-colored; fruit turbinate;
leaves glossy above, stiff and harsh in texture....Verdone
Stalk longer, up to 1/2 inch or more.
Stalk swollen or prominently enlarged; surface of fruit dull,
velvety...........Yellow Neches
Stalk not swollen.
Figs oblate; eye above medium, open, scales straw color..........................Grassale
Figs spherical or turbinate.
Color light green to yellow; eye scales often
brightly rose-colored; white flecks inconspicuous......................Troiano
Color grass green; eye scales chaffy or straw-colored;
white flecks scattered, more or less conspicuous................Monstrueuse
Neck present.
Stalk short and thick, seldom over 1/4 inch long.
Eye scales brightly rose-colored; neck short.................................................Col de Dame
Eye scales not brightly rose-colored, at least not the surface
scales; neck prominent,
up to 3/4 inch long, often curved...........................................................Gota de Mel
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 371
climatic influences. The fig described and illustrated in color by Carbon (1865a) as
Figue Blanche à Peau Verte may be the same variety.
Other accounts of this fig as Blanche, Blanche d’Argenteuil, Blanche Ronde, or Grosse
Blanche Ronde are by Merlet (1667), Liger (1702), Weston (1770), Knoop (1771), La
Brousse (1774), Rozier (1781—1805); Mirbel (1802—1806), Lamarck (1783—1817), Bory
de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette (1821, 1829), Couverchel (1839), Poiteau (1838—1846),
Dochnahl (1855), Duchartre (1857), Forney (1863), Lhérault (1872), Simon-Louis (1895),
Schneider (1902), Juignet (1909), Nomblot (1913), Mazières (1920), Leclerc (1925), Société
Nationale d'Horticulture de France (1928), A. Rivière (1928), G. Rivière (1930), Delplace
(1933), Delbard (1947), and Simonet et al. (1945). Figue Royale was described by
Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), and Noisette (1829), with
Versailles as a synonym. On the other hand, it was described as Versailles, with or
without the synonym Royale, by Couverchel (1839), Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876),
Hogg (1866), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Barron (1891), Eisen (1901), Bois (1928),
Blin (1942), and Evreinoff (1947). Eisen regarded Blanche and Versailles as distinct, but
later authors, such as Nomblot, Soc. Nat. d’Hort. de France (1928), and Simonet et al.,
treat them as the same variety. See Rolland (1914) for synonymy.
Descriptions of this variety as White Marseilles are given by Brookshaw (1812),
Baxter (1820), Sawyer (1824), Lindley (1831), Rogers (1834), Holley (1854), M’Intosh
(1855), Thompson (1859), Hogg (1866), G. S. (1867, 1869), Barron (1868c, 1891), Rivers
(1873), Coleman (1887b), Lelong (1890), Wythes (1890a), Massey (1893), Burnette (1894),
Wright (1895), Forrer (1894), Eisen (1885, 1897, 1901), Thomas (1902), Ward (1904),
Starnes (1903, 1907), Royal Hort. Society (1916), B. A. Bunyard (1925, 1934), Cook (1925),
Arnold (1926), Fruit-Grower (1936), Condit (1947), and Preston (1951). Illustrations in
color are by Duhamel (1809), Brookshaw (1812), Noisette (1821), and Wright (1895).
Illustrations in black and white are by Poiteau, Eisen (1901, fig. 75), Bois, Société’
Nationale d’Horticulture de France, Starnes, Bunyard (1934), Simonet, and Condit
(1941a, fig. 2, E).
The name White Marseilles became attached to a fig that Brookshaw described and
illustrated in color in 1812 of fruit gathered by himself from the original tree at the
Archbishop of Canterbury’s palace at Lambeth. This tree was generally believed to
have been planted by Cardinal Pole during the reign of Henry the Eighth. Another
account, that of Baxter (1820), stated that a fig tree at Oxford was introduced by a Mr.
Pocock, hence the name Pocock’s fig; fruit exhibited on August 17, 1819, proved to be
that of the White Marseilles. John Wright (1895) referred to a large tree of White
Marseilles with a trunk 6 feet 9 inches in circumference 2 feet above the ground.
Sawyer, in 1824, reported that the fig he named Ford’s Seedling was sometimes called
the Pocock, but was more properly designated White Marseilles. Various authors,
including Lindley, Thompson, and Hogg, described White Marseilles, with Figue
Blanche as a synonym. The description and illustration by Eisen in 1901 of Marseillaise
White are regarded here as properly referring to Blanche. White Genoa, as pointed
374 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Trees of Blanche are slow-growing, fairly dense, with green terminal buds. Leaves
medium, 3- to 5-lobed; surface glossy above; upper sinuses of medium depth, narrow,
lower sinuses shallow; base subcordate, sometimes auricled; margins crenate; mature
blades often affected by necrotic spots (plate 13). The following description of fruit is
from specimens grown at Riverside since 1930.
Breba crop fair; figs medium or above, up to 2 inches in length and 1-7/8 inches in
diameter, turbinate, with broad, rounded apex; neck thick and short, or absent; stalk
slightly curved, 1/4 inch long; ribs few, inconspicuous eye medium, open, scales chaffy,
erect at maturity; flecks very small and inconspicuous, green rather than white; bloom
delicate; color light green; pulp and meat white; seeds large, conspicuous; quality fair to
good.
Second-crop figs much the same as brebas, except for smaller size; average weight 30
grams; shape spherical to oblate, mostly without neck; stalk up to 1/2 inch long. Flavor
fairly rich and sweet; quality fair as a fresh fruit, of light weight and poor quality when
dried; susceptible to fruit spoilage. (Plates 8; 26, A.)
Caprification has little effect upon size and color, either of skin or pulp. Figs
produced at Portland, Oregon, and in coastal districts of California, are usually larger in
size and more oblate in shape than those just described. Near Paris the second crop of
Blanche matures in warm seasons only.
Brindisino. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as an oval, yellowish fig with amber pulp,
very sweet; consumed more fresh than dried.
Castellana. A variety under this name was received from Málaga, Spain, 1925, as P.I.
No. 62,778. The second-crop figs are below medium in size, pyriform, yellowish green
in color; pulp amber; quality poor. (Plate 8.)
Citrato. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as a medium-sized fig of citron-yellow color,
hence the name. Pulp white, with numerous seeds. Consumed fresh.
Colombo Bianco (syn. Colummo Bianco). Described by Semmola (1845), Vallese
(1909), De Rosa (1911), and Ferrari (1912). Illustrated by Semmola and by Vallese;
regarded by Semmola as corresponding to Portoghese of Gallesio, but later writers fail
to mention this similarity. Semmola stated that the figs sometimes drop prematurely,
or reach only partial maturity; and De Rosa expressed doubt whether caprification is
necessary. Vallese described Colummo Bianco as very similar to Colummone
(Colombro) in fruit, but different in leaf characters.
Tree vigorous, attaining large size. Leaves large, asymmetrical, mostly 5-lobed.
Description of fruit is after Vallese and De Rosa.
Brebas large, 3 inches broad by 3-1/2 inches in length, elongated-turbinate, broad at
apex; eye large; skin thick, checking at maturity, greenish yellow in color; pulp creamy
white.
Second-crop figs smaller, 2-1/4 by 2-3/4 inches, nearly spherical; stalk short; color
greenish yellow, with many white flecks; pulp white, or sometimes light rose-colored;
flavor sweet, delicate. Variety important, not only for its excellent breba crop, but also
for the main crop. Used both fresh and dried. According to Ferrari, brebas are used as
fresh fruit at Cosenza, and not exported.
376 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Dorée Nobis (or Norbus). Briefly described by Barron (1891), Shinn (1892, 1893,
1903), Forrer (1894), and Starnes (1903, as Golden Narbus, with illustrations) Described
and figured by Eisen (1901) as a medium, pyriform fig, greenish yellow in color, with
amber pulp; very similar to Dorée, but differing in color of pulp; spelling of name
doubtful. Introduced in the Chiswick collection as P.I. No. 18,892.
Dottato (syns. Abruzzes, Adottato, Binello, Dattero (?), Datteresi, Dottato Bianco,
Grascello, Trifero, Medot, Gentile, Napoletani, Ottato, Uttato, Vottato, Kadota,
Clarkadota, Endrich, White Endrich, White Pacific, Ficus carica binella Risso).
Described by Porta (1592), La Quintinie (1692), Tournefort (1700), Liger (1702), Gallesio
(1817), Risso (1826), Gasparrini (1845, as Ficus dottata), Duchartre (1857), Pasquale
(1876), Roda (1881), Savastano (1885), Eisen (1888, 1897, 1901), Stubenrauch (1903),
Mingioli (1904), Pellicano (1907), Starnes and Monroe (1907); Guglielmi (1908), Vallese
(1909), Portale (1910), De Rosa (1911), Ferrari (1912), Siniscalchi (1911), Clark (1920),
Borg (1922), Condit (1920c, 1921c, 1923, 1927, 1933, 1947), Anagnostopoulos (1937),
Mauri (1942), Simonet et al. (1945), Tamaro (1948), Donno (1951a, 1951b), Casella (1952),
and Baldini (1953). Illustrated in color by Clark; in black and white by Eisen, Vallese,
Condit, Mauri, Tamaro, Simonet et al., Baldini, and Casella. (See last for synonyms.)
Dottato is probably the most important single fig variety grown. It constitutes a large
percentage of the 70,000 tons of dried figs produced annually in Italy. In California the
amount of dried figs of this variety totals over 3,000 tons, while 7,500 tons of fresh figs
are canned; there are also many carloads of fresh fruit sent each season to local and
distant markets, and dooryard trees are numerous.
According to Gallesio and some other Italian writers, Dottato is of ancient origin,
having been praised by Pliny as an excellent fig for drying. This and a few other
varieties may, therefore, have been perpetuated for some twenty centuries as single
clones by propagation from cuttings. Porta described it as Ottato, a name which is still
used around Naples. Gallesio reported that it is called Dottati at Sarzana, Binellino at
Spezia and Chiavari, Binelli and Fichi di Napoli at Genoa, Gentile at Voltri, Napoletani
at Finali, Fichi di Calabria and Dattaresi in western Liguria. According to Vallese, it is
known as Napoletano at Corigliano d’Otranto, Lumincella at Francavilla, and
Biancolella or Nardeleo at Oria and near Brindisi. The name Binelli is applied to
Dottato by Risso because two fruits are often found joined together at the peduncle.
Under his account of Dottato, Gallesio quoted the Latin description of Tournefort, who
gave the common name as Medot, a synonym also used by La Quintinie and Liger. The
latter stated that Medot is not raised much in France, as it is only mediocre in quality.
Simonet et al. described Gentile, grown at Cap de Antibes, where it is called Figue des
Abruzzes, and added that this variety appears to be the Dottato of Italy. Fracatsani,
introduced in 1901 under P.I. No. 6,114 as one of the finest table figs grown on the
island of Corfu, appeared to be identical with Dottato in the collection of varieties at
Chico, California.
Trifero is described by Barron (1891) and Eisen (1901). The following P.I. numbers
were labeled Trifero: 18,855, in the Chiswick collection from England; 86,802, from
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 377
Nikita, Yalta, Crimea; and 102,021, from Marrakech, Morocco. In variety trials all three
of these introductions proved to be identical with Dottato.
Dottato is grown commercially in all of the fig districts south of Naples, as well as in
Sicily. Siniscalchi calls it the variety par excellence, and states that it is rightly known as
the “golden fig.” According to Ferrari, it is the one best adapted to local conditions,
both along the coast, as at Agropoli, and in the foothill valleys, such as at Cosenza. Both
Guglielmi and Pellicano give it first rank among the figs of southern Italy, and De Rosa
classes it highly for production of dried figs, as it has few seeds, sweet pulp, and
delicate, although relatively thick, skin. It has been introduced into Greece, where
Anagnostopoulos reports that trees produced and matured fruit well.
The exact time of the first introduction of Dottato into California is not known.
Italian settlers in the foothill districts of the San Joaquin Valley undoubtedly introduced
cuttings of this and other varieties for planting; large trees are still to be found on
ranches established before the middle of the past century. White Endich is the name
applied to a fig introduced into the Stockton district before 1870 and named for Mr.
Endich of that city; later it was found to be identical with Dottato. The history of the
Kadota fig and its rise to popularity has been related by Condit (1920c, 1927). Cuttings
distributed by Van Deman (1890) of the United States Department of Agriculture under
the name Dottato, were grown by the nursery firm, Twogood and Cutter, of Riverside,
about 1889. The fruit exhibited in Los Angeles in 1893 attracted considerable attention,
and created a demand for trees. In 1898, Stephen H. Taft, of Sawtelle, obtained cuttings
and labeled the variety Kadota.
The name White Pacific was given to a fig propagated by W. R. Strong and Company,
Sacramento, and described in their catalogue in 1883. It was found on the place of a Mr.
White at Penryn, hence the name; but according to Milco (1884), trees of the same kind
were “scattered now almost every place over the State,” especially around Stockton.
Lelong (1890) reported it from San Diego. Clarkadota was the appellation coined in
1920 by a development company at Stockton, and purported to represent trees of a
superior strain. Both White Pacific and Clarkadota have proved to be identical with
Dottato when trees are grown side by side in the same orchard. P.I. No. 58,643 was
introduced from Padua, Italy, as Dottato. It was grown and tested at the California
stations, and was reported to be the best white fig fruited at Pomona in 1903, going
through fog and rain without souring. Woodard (1938) reported that in Georgia the
Kadota was the sweetest fig under test, and of superior quality, but that trees were
more subject to cold injury than those of Celeste (Malta). In 1948, a few Kadota trees
were found near Diamond Springs, Virginia.
Dottato is variously reported as a one-crop or a two-crop variety, the number of crops
depending upon the locality where grown. For example, at Riverside and in the coastal
districts of southern California the trees seldom mature perfect brebas; at Fresno, where
the day and night temperatures of spring and early summer are much higher, a good
breba crop is produced.
378 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Trees are generally vigorous, developing naturally into a compact, rounded head
(plate 1); terminal, dormant buds are green, as described by Donno (1951a). Leaves
medium, dull to somewhat glossy above, variable, with nonlobed, 3-lobed, and 5-lobed
leaves on the same tree, as shown by Condit (1927); upper and lower sinuses mostly
rather shallow; base cordate; margins serrate to coarsely crenate.
Breba crop none, or fair; fruit medium to large, pyriform, often somewhat oblique;
average weight 52 grams; neck thick, up to 7/8 inch long, sometimes curved; stalk
variable, from short to 1/2 inch long; ribs present, moderately elevated, but mostly
inconspicuous; eye medium to large, open, with thick, chaffy scales; surface fairly
glossy; bloom delicate; white flecks few, but large and conspicuous; color green to
yellowish green; meat thin, tinged with violet; pulp amber. Flavor rich and sweet;
quality excellent; seeds few, hardly noticeable. (Plates 7; 20, A.)
Second-crop figs variable from early to late part of season and under different
climatic conditions; size from below to above medium, or even large (1-3/4 inches in
diameter by 2-1/4 inches in length); weight ranges from 30 to 80 grams; shape spherical
to obovate, with or without short, thick neck; stalk variable, short and thick, or
sometimes up to 1/2 inch long; ribs fairly prominent in larger specimens, or practically
absent in smaller fruit as used for canning; eye medium, apparently open, but closed
within the orifice, often sealed with drop of gum; scales straw color; surface glossy, with
delicate bloom; skin rather thick, rubbery in texture, resistant to injury in handling;
color green in cool climates to golden yellow in hot interior valleys; meat white, or often
tinted violet in coastal climates, as pointed out by Condit (1950); pulp amber; seeds few,
small, seed coat hardly or not at all sclerified. Flavor sweet, but lacking distinctive
character; quality excellent, especially for preserving and canning; skin of dried fruit
somewhat thick and tough. (Plates 12; 20, B.)
Caprified figs larger, grass green; pulp strawberry; seeds fertile. Good for drying.
(Plates 8; 11.)
Early White (syn. Jaune Hâtive). Described by Lindley (1831); his account was
apparently copied by Hogg (1866); also described by Eisen (1888, 1901). Figs small,
turbinate-spherical, pale yellow; pulp amber, not highly flavored.
Edeisi (syn. Blati). Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety grown in
the Jerusalem subdistrict. Figs medium, spherical, flattened at the apex; neck and stalk
both short; color light green; pulp amber; quality fair.
Florentine. Described by Gould (1923) as a local variety found at Alexandria,
Louisiana, and labeled Florentine; no mention, however, was made of this fig in the
1935 edition of Gould’s publication. Fruit medium to large, pale green; pulp amber.
Fracazzano (syn. Fracazzano Bianco). Described by Guglielmi (1908), Vallese (1909,
with illustrations), De Rosa (1911), Tamaro (1948), and Donno (1951b). According to
Vallese, this variety is grown throughout Lecce Province for its two crops of fruit, the
second maturing into early October if the weather continues favorable. De Rosa reports
that caprification is practiced, but Vallese maintains that the reason growers put
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 379
caprifigs in the trees is that caprified figs mature about fourteen days earlier than those
that are uncaprified.
Leaves of medium size, 3- to 5-lobed; terminal buds green, as described by Donno
(1951a).
Brebas medium, turbinate, the body gradually narrowing toward the base into a
short neck; stalk short; color yellowish green; white flecks scattered; skin checking at
maturity; pulp amber, sweet; quality good.
Second-crop figs globular, slightly depressed at the apex; stalk short; ribs few,
extending from base to apex; eye rather small, with rosy scales; skin thick; color
greenish yellow; white flecks present; pulp creamy white, very sweet; seeds few, rather
small.
Hdadi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a subvariety of Sfari, growing in
northern Palestine, and resembling Byadi in color and size. Figs medium, green; eye
closed, scales straw-colored; pulp amber; flavor sweet, good; seeds few.
Hdeidarmal. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as an uncommon variety of
Palestine, also known as Droubi. Figs medium, spherical, green; eye open; pulp
brownish amber; flavor insipid.
Jaune de Toulouse. Described by Eisen (1901) as a very handsome fig, large, oblong;
skin and pulp yellow.
Kahramani. An Egyptian fig, described by Badie and Ghamrawi (1931). Tree of
medium size; leaves deeply lobed. Bears two crops, the first of which is most
important. Appears in the markets earlier than Sultani.
Figs medium, oblate-spherical; stalk short; skin thin, glabrous; color yellow; pulp
amber, seedless, very sweet.
Kargigna. See short description by Forrer (1894) as Rargigna. Briefly described by
Eisen (1901) as a variety introduced into California by G. N. Milco from Dalmatia. Figs
medium or below, turbinate, light green; pulp amber. Quality mediocre; good only for
the table.
Magdalen. Described by Eisen (1897, 1901), with illustration of leaf and fruit; also, in
the 1901 catalogue of Barren Hill Nursery, Nevada City, California, as a French fig, far
superior to the Ischias and the Celeste (Malta).
Starnes and Monroe (1907) reported a test of “Magdalena,” received from California,
but trees had not fruited up to that time. The variety is here considered distinct from
Madeleine, which Eisen gives as a synonym.
Figs described as small, turbinate-spherical, with long, slender stalk; ribs prominent;
color greenish yellow; pulp amber.
Minuto Bianco. Described by Ferrari (1912) as a small, elongated turbinate fig, with
short stalk; skin covered with a fine pubescence; color greenish yellow; pulp amber.
Used both fresh and dry.
Mshaki. Briefly described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety grown at
Jenin, Palestine. It produces large, light-green fruits, with honey colored pulp, sweet
and good in flavor.
Ojo de Perdiz (syns. Ull de Perdiu, Martinenca Blanca). Described and illustrated by
Estelrich (1910) as a variety commonly grown at Manacor and other towns on the island
of Mallorca.
380 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
prominent; stalk short; eye small, closed, scales yellow; skin firm, with delicate bloom;
color greenish yellow; pulp amber; seeds few. Quality good; excellent for drying.
Season late September.
Tossico. Briefly described by Ferrari (1912) as an Italian fig, greenish yellow in color,
with amber pulp; matures in September.
Urjal (syns. Capa Rôta, Branco). Described by Mello Leotte (1901) as Urjal, a
corruption of the word argel, signifying “soft”; i.e., fig of the soft skin. Described and
illustrated by Bobone (1932) as Capa Rôta, with synonyms as above.
This Portuguese variety has two crops.
Breba crop small; fruits large, pyriform, green; pulp amber. Second-crop figs below
medium, turbinate, without neck; stalk medium; pulp coarse in texture, amber; quality
fair.
Verdeccio (syns. Verdecchio, Verdichio, probably Verdino di Brianza). Described by
Tanara (1651), Gallesio (1817), Gasparrini (1845, as Ficus hypoleuca), Duchartre (1857),
and Eisen (1888, 1901). Figured by Gallesio and by Eisen. In 1651, Tanara listed
Verdecchio as a variety resistant to cold and good for drying. In 1668, Aldrovandi
included Verdecchij in a list of several Italian figs of that period. Gallesio described it as
a variety highly esteemed at Bologna and in some parts of Lombardy. Eisen does not
give the source of the material which he described and illustrated. Apparently the
variety has not attracted favorable attention in Italy, and is not represented in any
collection in California.
Second-crop figs below medium, pyriform, according to Gallesio, spherical, without
neck, according to Eisen; color yellowish green; pulp amber. Season late.
Verdillo (syns. Verdolino and Verdoso), described and figured by Tamaro (1948),
appears to be very similar to Verdeccio.
Yaffawi (syns. Bourtawi, Shourtawi, Shheimi). Described by Grasovsky and Weitz
(1932). Tree prolific, bearing regularly. Figs large, slightly elongated; neck and stalk
medium; eye almost closed, scales light green; color green, with ribs dark green; pulp
amber; seeds many.
Zonto. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as a variety grown in Lecce Province, Italy,
bearing spherical figs, with very short stalk; color yellow; pulp amber; generally
consumed fresh.
Abakor (syn. Abakour Amellal). According to Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872), the
Kabyles retain the Arabic name bakour, “early,” for this variety, because of its abundant
crop of brebas. Listed by Eisen (1901) as Abakour Amellal, probably from P.I. No.
6,469; described and illustrated by Mann (1939b) ; see also Montagnac (1952).
Trees vigorous, producing two crops. Leaves 5-lobed.
Figs medium, globular; stalk short; ribs present; eye open; skin green; pulp rose-
colored; quality mediocre. Brebas consumed fresh; second-crop figs generally dried.
382 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Aberdin. Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica aberdina. Figs above medium,
spherical; stalk short; skin color green; pulp red; honeylike drop often exuding from the
eye.
Agresto. Described by De Rosa (1911). Tree with slender branches, and medium, 5-
lobed leaves; breba crop small. Figs oblate, with slender stalk; eye large, with rose-
colored scales; skin green; pulp light red, sweet.
Ajlouni. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a very popular variety, one of
the best in Samaria; probably introduced to Ramallah from Smyrna. Figs small,
pyriform, with medium neck and stalk; color green; eye almost closed; pulp pinkish;
flavor good; seeds many.
Amudi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety grown at Nazareth.
Figs medium, spherical, with long stalk; skin green; pulp red; quality fair.
Angélique (syns. Melette, Petite Figue Grisé, Coucourelle Blanche, Madeleine, Early
Lemon, Figue d’Or). See Rolland (1914) for synonymy. There are many descriptions of
this variety. The most noteworthy ones follow. Merlet (1667), La Quintinie (1692),
Liger (1702), Tournefort (1719), Duhamel (1768, 1809), Weston (1770), La Brousse (1774),
Rozier (1787), Le Berryais (1789), Mirbel (1802), Noisette (1821, 1829), Bory de Saint
Vincent (1824), Lindley (1831), Couverchel (1839), M’Intosh (1855), Dochnahl (1855),
Forney (1863), Hogg (1866), G. S. (1867), Barron (1868b), Du Breuil (1876), Hyde (1877),
Coleman (1887b), Watts (1890), Massey (1893), Burnette (1894), Eisen (1901), Starnes
(1903), Starnes and Monroe (1907), Evreinoff (1947), and Condit (1947). The color
illustration by Duhamel (1809) shows a small, green fig with short, thick neck; the one
by Barron shows a spherical fig, badly split at the apex; it is also figured by Starnes, and
by Condit (1941a, fig. 2, D)
Confusion has existed as to the identity of this variety, as well as its synonyms. La
Quintinie (translation by Evelyn) referred to “the little grey fig, almost of a tawny color,
called Melette in Gascony.” Tournefort described it as Melette or Coucourelle, of small
size and tawny color. Duhamel (1768) quoted Tournefort, then described the fruit as
very large, of a yellow color. Bernard (1787) disagreed with Duhamel, and believed the
description of Tournefort characterized the variety Coucourelle Brune better than
Angélique. Practically all later writers describe the color as yellow. Mirbel called it
Angélique or Melette, and stated that it was cultivated in nearly all parts of France.
Figue d’Or, P.I. No. 18,880, and Madeleine, P.I. No. 18,890, both of the Chiswick
collection, proved to be identical at Riverside. In view of the descriptions reviewed and
of the specimens of Madeleine fruiting at Riverside, we are inclined to agree with Hogg,
with G. S., and with Barron, rather than Eisen, that Madeleine is synonymous with
Angélique. The Madeleine listed by some authors as a synonym of Blanche (Versailles)
is different from the variety treated here. New French, described by Earle (1900), and
by Price and White (1902), and listed as promising by Reimer (1910), is probably
identical with Angélique.
Angélique is found in California only in collections. The tree is moderately vigorous,
bearing two crops. The leaves are variously described as “more entire than any other,”
and “longer than broad, and often have only three lobes.” Leaves of Riverside trees are
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 383
medium, mostly 3-lobed; upper surface dull; upper sinuses rather shallow and narrow;
base subcordate to truncate; margins coarsely crenate.
Breba crop fair to small; fruits medium, up to 2 inches in diameter, turbinate-
spherical; neck very short and indistinct; stalk 1/4 inch long, swollen toward the apex;
ribs present, narrow; eye large, open, scales chaffy, bordered with pink, often brightly
colored; surface waxy or glossy; color lemon yellow, with white flecks few and
inconspicuous; pulp light strawberry, hollow at the center. (Plate 21, C.)
Second-crop figs very similar in appearance to the brebas, but smaller in size; average
weight 32 grams; shape oblate-spherical, without neck; stalk up to 3/4 inch long, often
curved, and prominently swollen at the apex; fruit of beautiful appearance on account
of the waxy surface, bright yellow color, and rosy eye scales; pulp light strawberry to
almost amber, hollow, as shown by Condit (1941, fig. 11, C); flavor insipid; quality poor.
Very susceptible to insect infestation through the open eye, and to subsequent spoilage.
(Plates 8; 14, D.)
Figs incompletely parthenocarpic, many fruits dropping when small; caprified
specimens much the same as uncaprified ones in size and color, but with pulp bright
strawberry in color.
Angélique Jaune (syn. Vendôme). See description and illustration by Eisen (1901)
from figs produced at Niles, California. Original tree from Thomas Rivers and Son,
London. Reported to be a most valuable fig, distinct from Angélique, with large,
pyriform fruit, greenish yellow in color; pulp deep red. This is probably the same
variety described by Langley (1728) and Ballon (1692) as Angélique or Incarnadine.
Arneo Bianco (syns. Verneo Bianco, Inverneo, Invernale, Invernengo, Invernizzo,
Natalino, Tardo). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909) as an unusually late fig,
continuing to mature into October or even December in favorable seasons; also
described by Pellicano (1907), Guglielmi (1908), Portale (1910), and De Rosa (1911).
Tree large. Leaves generally 5-lobed. Figs medium, obovate; stalk very short; neck
absent; skin pale yellow, with scattered white flecks; eye scales intensely rose-colored;
pulp red. Consumed fresh.
Assel bou Tchiche. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) and by Minangoin
(1931). Leaves medium, deeply 3-lobed. Figs spherical, medium in size; neck indistinct;
eye open; color greenish yellow; pulp light red.
Assouani (syn. Abiad Assuan). Described by Badie and Ghamrawi (1931). Trees
medium. Leaves deeply 5-lobed. Two crops. Figs oblong or pyriform; stalk short; ribs
protruding; skin thin, yellowish green, firmly adhering to the meat; pulp light red;
seeds few. Second crop continues maturing until January at Qena and Assuan.
Badalhouce. Described and figured by Bobone (1932). Breba crop especially good;
fruits large, pyriform, greenish yellow; pulp carmine; texture fine; quality very good.
Second-crop figs not described.
Barnissotte Blanche (syns. Barnissotte White, Bourjassotte Blanche, Bernissou Blanc,
Brogiotto Bianco, Burjassotte Branco, Bordissotte (or Bordissot) Blanca, Bourgassotte,
Bourgeassotte, Olho de Passarinho, Regalo, Rainha, Ficus carica meridionalis Risso).
384 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Described by La Brousse (1774), Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Gallesio (1817), Risso
(1826), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Hogg (1866),
Pasquale (1876), Du Breuil (1876), Sauvaigo (1889, 1894), Eisen (1888, 1901), Barron
(1891), Mello Leotte (1901), Mingioli (1904), Trabut (1904), Starnes and Monroe (1907),
Estelrich (1910), Mazières (1920), Borg (1922), Sanchez (1922), Priego y Jaramillo (1922),
Leclerc (1925), Bois (1928), Bobone (1932), Bun (1942), Simonet et al. (1945), Evreinoff
(1947), and Baldini (1953). Illustrations by Eisen, Starnes, Estelrich, Bobone, Simonet,
and Baldini.
In 1817, Gallesio reported Brogiotto Bianco to be the king of figs, and believed it to be
a variety brought from Syria to Genoa sometime during the Crusades. He described the
tree as a giant among fruit trees, some measuring over two meters in trunk
circumference. The variety is widely distributed in Mediterranean countries. Estelrich
reported that on Mallorca there are orchards planted exclusively to Bordissot Blanca.
Bobone collected specimens of fruit from three different districts of Algarve, and
described it as Burjassotte Branco with three synonyms. Borg stated that it is the only
white fig not requiring caprification on Malta. Although Bourjassotte Blanche is
mentioned by Shinn (1915) as one of the varieties cultivated in California, the existence
of authentic trees is not known.
The tree bears a few brebas in some seasons only; the second crop is very prolific,
maturing over a long season. Leaves large, 3- to 5-lobed. Description of fruit is after
Simonet.
Second-crop figs medium, 2-1/4 inches long and broad, turbinate, somewhat
flattened at the apex; average weight 60 grams; neck prominent, short and thick; stalk
short; ribs present, but not marked; eye large, open, often splitting at maturity, scales
red; skin rather firm, uniformly yellowish green, with light bloom; meat white; pulp
red. Quality excellent fresh; also good for drying.
Bayoudi (syn. Adsi Abiad). Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929), and by Badie
and Ghamrawi (1931), as a variety of the Common type bearing figs medium in size,
oblate, with green skin and rose-colored pulp
Minangoin (1931) described three Tunisian varieties with similar names, all three
apparently requiring caprification. No. 5, Baioudi, from Gabès, produces medium,
oblate fruits, green in color, with red pulp. No. 17, Bioudi, from Gafsa, has small, oblate
figs, light green in color, with light-red pulp. No. 56, El-Baioudi, from Menzel Temine,
is reported to bear above medium, spherical fruits, with thick skin, green in color, and
red pulp. Valdeyron and Crossa-Raynaud (1950) report that the above names probably
refer to several clones having fruits with light-colored skin.
Berdauda (syns. Grosse Berdoua, Verdaou). Described by Du Breuil (1876), Sauvaigo
(1889), and Eisen (1888, 1901). A large, turbinate fig, greenish yellow in color, with red
pulp, grown in Provence, France.
Blancassa. Described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901); Ficus carica albida Risso
given as synonym. Two crops. Brebas subglobular, green, with yellow flush; pulp pale
rose. Second-crop figs subpyriform, greenish yellow; pulp red.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 385
Bontard. Two apparently different varieties are described by Eisen (1901) under this
name; no record is given of the source or the locality where the first was grown; it was a
fig below medium in size, with yellowish-green skin and pink pulp. The second
account refers to the Bontard received from the Royal Horticultural Society in the
Chiswick collection, first established at Niles, and later at Chico, Fresno, and Riverside,
under P.I. No. 18,836. Description follows, from trees fruiting at Riverside since 1930.
Tree not vigorous, fairly dense; terminal buds green. Leaves below medium to small,
mostly 3-lobed; upper surface glossy; upper sinus shallow, rather narrow; base
subcordate to truncate; margins dentate.
Brebas few, medium or above, variable in size and shape, commonly oblique-
pyriform; neck prominent, sometimes curved; stalk short; eye medium, open, with
straw-colored scales; white flecks numerous, fairly conspicuous; color light green; pulp
light strawberry; flavor mild; quality fair to poor.
Second-crop figs medium, turbinate; neck thick, slightly flattened in some specimens;
average weight 34 grams; ribs present, but not conspicuous, of same color as body; eye
large, open, attracting beetles; surface dull, with delicate bloom; white flecks
inconspicuous; color yellowish green; pulp very light strawberry to amber, somewhat
hollow; flavor mild. Quality poor; fruit very subject to spoilage; a worthless variety
here.
Caprified figs larger, with dark-strawberry pulp. (Plate 20, C.)
Borghino. Described and figured by Baldini (1953) from the Firenze district of Italy.
Tree moderately vigorous, producing one crop only; terminal buds light green.
Leaves mostly 7-lobed, with deep sinuses; petiolar sinus narrow. Figs spherical, with
short neck and medium stalk; eye open, surrounded by a brown ring; color light green;
pulp red, fairly sweet; seeds numerous.
Bouin (syns. Bovin, Ficus carica bovina Risso). Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo
(1889), and Eisen (1901).
Tree with thick branches. Leaves mostly 3-lobed. Figs above medium, elongated,
broadest toward the apex; skin and meat strongly adhering to the pulp; color greenish
yellow; eye projecting, surrounded by a red iris; pulp bright red, of agreeable flavor.
Boukrati. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety grown only in
northern Palestine. Figs medium, green; neck and stalk short; eye slightly open, with
pinkish scales; pulp red. Good for fresh fruit.
Bourdissotte Blanche. Described by Hogg (1866); his description closely followed by
Eisen (1888, 1901). Reported to be a good French drying fig, distinct from Bourjassotte
Blanche. Figs small, spherical-turbinate; color greenish yellow; pulp pale rose; flavor
rich.
Boutana. Described by Hogg (1866), Barron (1891), and Eisen (1901, after these two).
Fruit medium, oblique-oblate; ribs distinct; stalk short; skin downy, green, without
bloom; pulp dark rose; flavor flat.
Brianzola (syns. Passin, Passet). Described by Gallesio (1817), Roda (1881), Eisen
(1901), and Tamaro (1948). The following account is after those of Gallesio and Tamaro,
both of whom reported Brianzola to be one of the better figs of Lombardy.
386 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Figs small, gourd—shaped; color green; pulp red. Fresh fruit resistant to handling
and transport. Fruit shrivels on the tree, a fact which accounts for the local name,
“Passin” (raisin) ; also dries well in the sun, and is stored for winter use.
Buttafarro. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as a medium fig with thin, smooth skin,
yellowish green in color; pulp red; mostly consumed fresh; cultivated especially in the
vicinity of Squinzano.
Byadi (syn. Fallahi). Name signifies “white.” Described by Grasovsky and Weitz
(1932).
Trees small in size, not very prolific. Leaves deeply lobed. Figs medium, spherical;
neck and stalk short; eye open, scales brown; skin color light green; pulp light pink;
flavor sweet; seeds few and small. Mainly used for drying.
Cabroliana (syn. Douqueiretta). Second crop only described by Sauvaigo (1889) and
Eisen (1901). Figs pyriform, 1-5/8 inches in diameter, 2-1/2 inches long; color greenish
yellow; pulp red. Grown at Nice and in Provence.
Caiana Blanca (syn. Ficus carica candoleana Risso, according to Sauvaigo).
Described by Sauvaigo (1889) as a pyriform fig with light-green skin and red pulp.
Carabaseta. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as one of the best drying figs
of Mallorca, receiving a gold medal at the exposition in Manacor, 1896; see also account
of Priego y Jaramillo (1922), and of Condit (1925). P.I. No. 86,169, introduced from
Lérida Province in Spain in 1928 as Carabesseta, proved to be a striped fig very similar
to Panachée.
Tree of medium size, with 3-lobed leaves. Figs medium, conical, clear green; pulp
light red, very sweet. Highly flavored fresh, and of especially good quality dried.
Caravanchina (syns. Caravanchina Bianca, Ficus carica collina Risso). Specific name
collina implies “fig of the hills.” Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen
(1901).
Tree with long branches, producing two crops. Leaves 3- to 5-lobed; blade
sometimes prolonged to a point at the petiole.
Brebas above medium, pyriform, with elongated neck; eye prominent, with reddish
scales; meat streaked with violet; pulp light red.
Second-crop figs turbinate, 1-1/2 inches in diameter, greenish yellow; pulp red.
Carlina. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as originating at Algaida from a
tree growing in a dry wall.
Tree of moderate size. Leaves mostly 3-lobed. Figs medium; skin firm, light green in
color; pulp light red. Very good for drying and for cattle feed.
Cheihk-Ali. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gabès, Tunisia. Leaves large,
often nonlobed. Figs oblate, sessile, ribbed; eye wide open; color green, pruinose; pulp
red.
Cimeirenca Blanca. Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica cemenelea, or fig of
Amiez, France.
Tree small, very prolific; branches spreading into the shape of a parasol. Leaves
small, glossy, 3-lobed, or often entire. Figs medium, turbinate, with long stalk; eye rosy;
skin thick, light green; pulp red. Flavor very agreeable.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 387
with faint bloom; white flecks large, conspicuous; color yellowish green to lemon
yellow; skin sometimes checking at maturity, as shown by Condit (1941a, fig. 8, C); pulp
strawberry, almost seedless. Flavor sweet, but insipid; quality fair; season late.
Caprified figs above medium, green; pulp dark red; seeds fertile. (Plates 12; 20, D).
Cordelière (syns. Servantine, Coucourela, Coucourelle, Coucourelle Grisé, Ficus
carica tournefortiana Risso). See Rolland (1914) for synonymy. In 1700, Tournefort
described Figue Cordelière or Servantine, and quoted the description given by Cupani
four years earlier. The latter did not use the same variety names, but reported that it
was commonly known as Ficazzini Vera. Later authorities, who apparently described
the same variety, are:
Garidel (1715), La Brousse (1774), Bernard (1787), Rozier (1805), Duhamel (1809),
Lamarck (1817), Risso (1826), Lhérault (1872), Sauvaigo (1889, 1894), Eisen (1901),
Estelrich (1910, probably), Rolet (1916), and Leclerc (1925). This fig was described by
Duhamel as Servantine, showing illustrations in color; also by Risso as Ficus carica
cotignana, commonly known as Observantine. Simonet et al. (1945) consider Cordelière
and Cotignana as identical, and give other local names, such as Célestine. However, the
last name is regarded by Société’ Pomologique de France (1887, 1947)—also by Eisen—
as properly belonging to still another French fig of ashy-gray color. See accounts of
Observantine and Célestine. Apparently Cordelière has not been grown in California,
at least under that name.
The tree of Cordelière produces two crops, of which the first is the most highly
regarded. Leaves are 5-lobed, with the middle lobe unusually long.
Brebas are larger and more elongated than figs of the main crop; quality good.
Second-crop figs spherical, small, 1 inch in diameter, according to Bernard, about
1-1/2 inches long and 1-1/4 inches in diameter, according to Risso; ribs elevated; stalk
short; color yellowish green; pulp delicate rose. Figs often plunged into boiling water to
facilitate drying. Season early.
Cotignacenque (syns. Cotignac, Potignacenque). Described by Bernard (1787),
Duhamel (1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), and
Eisen (1901). A French fig, common at Hyères.
Tree good in dry soil. Leaves 3-lobed. Figs oblong, about 2 inches long and 1 inch in
width; stalk long; eye rose-colored; skin smooth, greenish yellow; pulp red. Quality
good, both fresh and dried. Figs dry readily on tree before dropping.
Cótio (syn. Malaguenho Branco). Described by Mello Leotte (1901) and Bobone
(1932)—the latter with illustrations—as the most important commercial variety of
Algarve. The orchards of Lameira are composed almost wholly of Cótio trees. At
Cacela, it is known as Malaguenho Bravo.
Breba crop none. Second-crop figs medium, turbinate; neck short and thick or none;
stalk short; color green; pulp carmine; texture coarse. Quality good, especially for
drying.
Damascene. Described and figured by Christ (1812) as a golden-yellow fig with red
pulp.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 389
Dame Blanche. Described and figured by Simonet et al. (1945) from specimens
collected at Sollies-Pont.
Tree bears one crop only. Leaves small, 5-lobed.
Figs small, oval-pyriform, without neck; average weight 17.5 grams; ribs not very
apparent; stalk up to 1/2 inch long; eye medium, circled by rosy, projecting scales; skin
velvety, checking at maturity, uniformly greenish yellow; pulp red; texture fine; seeds
small, not very numerous; quality mediocre.
Darji. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Menzel Temine, Tunisia. Leaves
medium, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses deep, almost closed, lower sinuses less
prominent. Figs medium, 1-1/2 inches in diameter, practically spherical; eye open; skin
rather thick, light green in color; pulp light red.
Datte. Described by Gallesio (1817), Gasparrini (1845, as Ficus deliciosa var.
castanea), Audibert Frères (1854), Hogg (1866), G. S. (1869), Du Breuil (1876), Pasquale
(1876), Roda (1881), Barron (1891), Eisen (1888, 1901), Starnes and Monroe (1907), and
by Tamaro (1948, with figure). Gallesio reported the following local names in Italy Fico
Madama Rosso at Milan, F. Genovese at Pavia and Laggo Maggiore, F. della Madonna
at Bergamo, F. Rossetto at Voghera, F. Larde at Alessandria, and F. Averengo and F.
Datto at Torino.
Datte is reported to be common in northern Italy, where the brebas are especially
esteemed; in southern districts, second-crop figs are better than brebas. It was
introduced into the United States in the Chiswick collection as P.I. No. 18,845, and
fruited in Georgia and California, but trees are now found only in collections.
The tree is of slow growth, with many small, slender twigs; terminal buds green.
Leaves medium, glossy above, 3- to 5-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth and width,
lower sinuses shallow; base subcordate to truncate; margins very shallowly crenate.
Description is from fruit produced at Riverside since 1931.
Breba crop small or none; fruit medium or above, oblique-pyriform, with prominent,
often curved neck; stalk short; color green, tinged with violet from the underlying violet
meat; pulp dark strawberry; flavor good.
Second-crop figs medium, up to 2-1/2 inches long and 1-1/2 inches in diameter,
oblique-pyriform, but irregular in shape and size; average weight 28 grams; neck up to
1/2 inch long, sometimes curved; stalk thick and short, or slender and over 1/2 inch
long; ribs slightly elevated, hardly prominent; surface dull, with light bloom; white
flecks large, scattered, conspicuous; eye medium, open, scales straw color; skin light
green, discolored by brown spots at maturity; meat white; pulp light strawberry, fairly
sweet and rich, but dry in texture; quality poor. A considerable percentage of the crop
drops when figs are small, indicating lack of caprification.
Caprified specimens with dark-green skin; eye scales bright rose color; fruits inclined
to split at apex; pulp of a rich strawberry color, subacid, but of agreeable flavor. Much
improved by caprification.
Variety generally poor, both fresh and dried, and not worthy of further culture in
California. (Plate 22, D.) See also Condit (1941a, fig. 2, U).
390 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Daurada. Described by Risso (1826, as Ficus carica lutea), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen
(1901), as a small, globular fig, broad at the apex; color greenish yellow; pulp red.
Grown near Nice, France.
Domestica. Briefly described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as a pyriform fig,
with greenish-yellow skin and red pulp.
D’Or de Laura. Description by Eisen (1888, 1901), after that of Hogg (1866). Figs
below medium, oblong; ribs obscure; eye closed; color yellowish green; pulp opaline,
sweet; quality excellent.
Dorée (syns. Figue d’Or, Goutte d’Or). Described by Merlet (1667), Ballon (1692),
Liger (1702), Langley (1728), Société Pomologique de France (1887, 1947), Eisen (1888,
1901), Starnes and Monroe (1907), Juignet (1909), Simonet et al. (1945), and Delbard
(1947). Illustrated in black and white by Starnes and Monroe and by Simonet.
Illustrated in color by Delbard.
Dorée is a French fig, reported by Merlet and other early writers to be subject to
splitting or cracking of the skin, and therefore good only for hog feed; the checked skin
also suggested to them the torn robe of a beggar; in general, however, it is described as
a handsome fig of excellent quality. Starnes found in Georgia that Dorée appeared to be
the same as Magnolia (Brunswick), a report which casts doubt on the identity of the
specimens grown. It is doubtful, moreover, whether the true Dorée has ever fruited in
California, although P.I. No. 18,897 of the Chiswick collection was labeled as that
variety; no trees are now known to occur in collections of varieties. P.I. No. 102,013,
introduced from Morocco in 1933 as Goutte d’Or, was found to be the same as Dottato
at Riverside.
Tree of Dorée produces two crops. Leaves medium to small, 3- to 5-lobed.
Description is after Simonet, from fruit grown at Bagnols-sur-Ceze.
Brebas large, elongated-pyriform, somewhat oblique; length 3-1/4 inches, diameter
2-1/4 inches; average weight 85 grams; neck not distinct, merging gradually with the
body; stalk conical, swollen toward the junction with the fruit, about 1/2 inch long; ribs
not very well marked; eye in a slight depression, large, half open; scales erect, yellow to
rose-colored; skin delicate, yellowish green, becoming golden yellow slightly tinged
with rose on the exposed side; pulp salmon; texture fine; seeds few; quality fair.
Second-crop figs smaller, globular, or short-pyriform; stalk swollen; ribs none; color
same as brebas; pulp light rose. Quality good; excellent for drying.
Douqueira Blanca. Described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as a fig
resembling Douqueira Negra (Perroquine), except in color, which is yellowish green;
pulp bright red; excellent as a fresh fruit.
Du Roi. Described by G. S. (1869), Barron (1891), Colby (1894), Shinn (1893, 1903),
Forrer (1894), Eisen (1897, 1901), Price and White (1902, with figure), Starnes (1903),
Starnes and Monroe (1907, with figure), Woodroof and Bailey (1931), and Blin (1942).
Du Roi is a good example of a variety which was once tested and received high
praise, but failed to become established. Very few accounts of it are found in
horticultural publications of England. However, it was included in the ‘Chiswick
collection from that country as P.I. No.18,843, and tested widely by the California
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 391
Experiment Stations. Shinn reported in 1893 and 1903 that Du Roi was considered the
highest-flavored fig grown, especially in the foothills of the San Joaquin Valley; trees
suffered severe winter injury at the Tulare Experiment Station. Eisen regarded it as one
of the very best figs, and stated: “It cannot be too highly recommended, and will no
doubt become one of the most extensively grown figs in California and Arizona.” His
illustration shows four specimens that are pyriform and of medium size. Colby gave a
short description of figs grown at Tulare, and analysis of the fresh fruit. Price could not
have had the true Du Roi, for he represented the Texas-grown fruits as small and dark
purple. Starnes described specimens from three different sources in Georgia, and
illustrated one; the trees were found to be extremely productive, with fruit continuing
to mature until frost. In spite of its early promise, Du Roi has apparently been lost
completely from collections of fig varieties in Georgia and California. Description is
from that of Eisen; apparently only one crop.
Figs above medium, round-pyriform, oblique, with swollen cheeks; ribs few, slightly
elevated; neck short, variable; eye large, with amber scales; color pale bluish green; pulp
amber, streaked with rose; texture fine; seeds many, minute. Quality excellent, both
fresh and dried.
Barron (1891) described it as “small, roundish, pale yellow.”
El Bitri. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) and Hodgson (1931), from
Tunisia, as an interesting variety from the standpoint of production and quality. Also
described by Minangoin (1931), from Gabès.
The tree bears two crops. Figs large, green to yellowish in color, sessile; neck none;
eye open; pulp red; seeds few.
El Khadri. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) and by Minangoin (1931) as
Khedri. Figs with short, thick neck and prominent ribs; color green, as the name
indicates; pulp red; seeds numerous.
Eyrogue (syn. D’Eyrogue). Described by Hogg (1866) and Eisen (1888, 1901) as a
French fig, below medium in size, oblate, pale yellow in color; pulp light red, not
particularly rich in flavor.
Fourrassa. Described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as one of the largest of
autumn figs, oblong, greenish yellow; pulp red; quality mediocre.
Fqeisi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a midseason fig of northern
Palestine, medium in size, spherical, greenish yellow in color; pulp red; seeds few.
Gambalunga (syn. Coscialunga). Described by Savastano (1885) as a medium fig,
canary yellow in color, with red pulp.
Gennes (syns. Aubicon, Figue Fièvre). Described by Merlet (1667), Liger (1702),
Bradley (1757), Trabut (1904), and Blin (1942). First crop small; second crop good.
According to Trabut, the figs are pyriform, with very small eye, gray color, and pale-
rose pulp. Langley (1728) described Genoa, called by the French, Figue de Gennes or La
Figue Fièvre, as a long, brownish purple fig.
Genoa (syns. Genoa White, White Genoa). Described by Miller (1768), Forsyth
(1803), Lindley (1831), Rogers (1834), Holley (1854), M’Intosh (1855), Dochnahl (1855),
White (1868), Hogg (1866), G. S. (1869), Massey (1893), Eisen (1885, 1897, 1901), Davis
(1928), Burger and De Wet (1931), and Condit (1947). Illustrated by Eisen, who stated
392 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
that the identity of this variety and the origin of its name had not been established. It is
not identical with Marseilles White, as given by Rogers and by some other authors.
Although long grown in England, the Genoa has not been favored so highly as certain
other varieties, partly because the trees are such light producers. Davis reports that this
variety is grown in all parts of the Union of South Africa, where it “rejoices in eleven
other names, amongst them White Marseilles.” He regards the fruit as good both for
eating fresh and for drying.
In 1853, W. B. West, of Stockton, California, imported several varieties, including
White Genoa, from Hovey & Co., Boston; and in 1883, the California Nursery Company,
Niles, obtained it from England. The variety was tested at the California Experiment
Stations, but did not prove to be outstanding, either in tree production or in fruit
quality. Genoa has not been planted commercially in California, and is not
recommended for dooryard planting in the interior valleys. However, in coastal
districts, some growers report excellent results with it. At San Simeon, for example, the
tree produces two crops in favorable seasons; the first matures after the middle of
August, and following a short intermission, the second crop continues until frost. At
San Jose the tree bears well, but fruit is of poor quality, and is inclined to spoil on
account of the large eye and hollow center. Both P.I. No. 101,712, introduced in 1933 as
Arabaly, and P.I. No. 101,719, introduced as Neapolitan, from Sochi, North Caucasus,
proved to be identical with Genoa at Riverside.
Trees are of moderate vigor, with spreading branches; terminal buds tawny to light
brown, an unusual character for a green-fruited variety. Leaves medium to large, 3- to
5-lobed; upper surface dull; upper sinuses of medium depth and width, lower sinuses
shallow and broad; base broadly subcordate, sometimes auricled; margins shallowly
crenate. Description is from fruits produced at Riverside and Menlo Park.
Breba crop small; fruits large, 2-1/4 inches in diameter by 2-1/2 inches in length, or
in coastal districts more elongated, up to 3-1/2 inches; average weight 80 grams; shape
oblique-pyriform, with short neck, or sometimes with longer, curved neck; stalk very
short; ribs rather prominent, elevated; eye medium, open, scales chaffy or light rose;
white flecks more or less concealed by yellowish-green skin color; skin smooth; bloom
inconspicuous; pulp light strawberry, hollow at center; flavor sweet, but not rich; seeds
few, small; quality fair. (Plate 22, A.)
Second-crop figs medium or above, up to 2 inches in diameter and 2-1/4 inches in
length, somewhat oblique, turbinate; average weight 60 grams; apex broad and
flattened; neck very short, or absent; stalk short and thick, or sometimes curved, and up
to 3/8 inch long; ribs elevated, mostly prominent; surface dull; bloom hardly
perceptible; color greenish yellow, blemished by circular, brown spots at maturity; skin
thin, tender, peeling readily; pulp amber, tinged with strawberry, hollow at center;
texture gelatinous; flavor mild; quality poor; seeds practically none. Very susceptible to
spoilage. (Plate 22, B.)
Caprified specimens with green skin color, dark-strawberry pulp, and large, fertile
seeds; inclined to split at maturity. Quality fair as fresh fruit, but poor when dried
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 393
Glati. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety grown in the Safad
subdistrict of Palestine. Figs small, spherical, green, with open eye and yellow scales;
pulp distinctive, on account of its purplish-red color. Leaves are unusually thick.
Gorgone. Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica gorgonea, but this name is not
found in later publications. Figs medium, oblong, narrowed toward the long stalk;
color greenish yellow; eye large, with a raised border; pulp light red.
Gota de Mel (syn. Gota de Goma). Names signify “honey-drop” and “gum-drop”;
figs when ripening exude a sugary syrup from the eye. This variety, received at
Riverside in 1926 from Lérida, Spain, is distinct from Fraga (Col de Dame) and others in
the collection; no description under the above names has been found.
Tree moderately vigorous, with branches swollen at the nodes; terminal buds green.
Leaves medium, somewhat glossy above, mostly 3-lobed; upper sinuses shallow; base
subcordate to truncate; margins crenate. Description is from figs produced at Riverside,
Los Angeles, and Fresno.
Breba crop small; fruits elongated-pyriform, with neck over 1 inch long; stalk 1/4
inch long; ribs fairly prominent; eye medium, open; color green; pulp light strawberry;
flavor rich; eating quality good. Of no commercial value, on account of light crop and
elongated shape.
Second-crop figs medium to large, up to 2-1/4 inches long and 2 inches broad,
pyriform, with thick, prominent neck that is often curved; average weight 40 grams;
stalk thick, up to 1/4 inch long, constricted at its insertion with the thick neck; ribs
prominent, well elevated; eye medium, open; surface dull; white flecks large, scattered;
color green; skin checking at maturity, as shown by Condit (1941a, fig. 8, E); pulp light
strawberry; flavor rather strong; quality fair.
Caprified figs similar in size and shape, but with dark-red pulp. Variety of no
particular value, on account of discoloration of skin at maturity and susceptibility to
splitting and insect infestation. (Plate 22, C.) See also Condit (1941a, fig. 2, Q.)
Gounti. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Dra Tamar, Tunisia. Leaves large,
mostly 3-lobed. Figs spherical, with short neck; skin of fine texture, green in color,
without ribs; pulp solid, rose color; seeds numerous.
Another variety, also designated as Gounti, is described by Minangoin from Kalaâ
Srira. Leaves small, 3- to 5-lobed. Figs large, with indistinct neck; eye open; skin color
light green; pulp pomegranate red.
A third variety is described by Minangoin as Gounti, from Hammamet; it is reported
to require caprification. Figs small, pyriform; skin thin, glossy, golden yellow in color.
Grassale. Barron (1891) described this variety as bearing small, pyriform figs. Eisen
(1901) regarded Grassale as a synonym of Figue de Grasse or Matarassa, the fruit of
which is described as very large. P.I. No. 18,883 of the Chiswick collection was received
in California as Grassale, and fruited in several collections. At the Tulare Experiment
Station of the University, it was reported as a failure in 1890. The following description
is from trees growing at Riverside since 1928.
394 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Trees small, lacking in vigor; terminal buds green. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy
above, mostly 5-lobed; both upper and lower sinuses moderately deep and broad; basal
sinus sometimes broadly subcordate, but often narrow, or almost closed; margins
crenate.
Breba crop none. Second-crop figs oblate-spherical, below medium to small; average
weight 25 grams; neck absent, or when present, short and somewhat flattened; ribs
fairly conspicuous; eye medium, open; color green, becoming spotted with brown at
maturity, unattractive; pulp light strawberry, or dark red when caprified; quality poor.
Very susceptible to spoilage. (Plate 17, D.)
Grasse (syns. Figue de Grasse, Matarassa, Figue Grisé’, Ficus carica grassensis Risso,
Grassenque; the last according to Du Breuil and Eisen). Described by Bernard (1787),
Duhamel (1809), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Duchartre (1857),
Hogg (1866), Du Breuil (1876), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1888, 1901). Bernard
recorded this variety in 1787 as Figue de Grasse, and all other authors followed this
nomenclature until 1889, when Sauvaigo called it Matarassa. The account by Duhamel
followed very closely that of Bernard, as in fact did several others, mostly without
giving credit. Figue Castex (Grasse) described by Ounous (1863) may be the same
variety. With the exception of Hogg, British authors ignore the variety, at least under
the name Grasse. However, P.I. No. 18,850 was received in California with the
Chiswick collection under the label Grasse, and fruited in various collections. At
Riverside, this introduction proved to be a violet-fruited variety, identical with
Bourjassotte Grisé. The following description is after that of Eisen, who reported it to
be highly recommended for rich bottom lands.
Tree is vigorous, with 3-lobed leaves.
Figs very large, 8 to 9 inches in circumference by 3 inches in length, turbinate, with
flattened apex; neck short; ribs distinct; stalk very short; eye open; skin thin, light
yellow, with delicate bloom; pulp very dark red. A handsome fig, of medium quality
when fresh, but better when dried.
Grosse Jaune (syns. Aubico Blanco, Aubique Blanche, Tapa Cartin, Ficus carica
monstrosa Risso). Described by La Quintinie (1692) as La Grosse Jaune; others who
give this name preference are Tournefort (1700), Garidel (1715), La Brousse (1774),
Rozier (1805), Duhamel (1809), Lamarck (1817), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette
(1829), Couverchel (1839), Leclerc (1925), and Evreinoff (1947). The following authors
used the designation Aubique Blanche: Bernard (1787), Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil
(1876), and Bois (1928). Sauvaigo (1889, 1894) is followed by Eisen (1901) and by
Simonet et al. (1945) in listing and describing this fig as Tapa Cartin, without any
explanation as to the meaning of the name. Estelrich (1910) and Priego y Jaramillo
(1922) described it as Albacor Blanca. Risso (1826) treated it as Ficus carica monstrosa,
or “figue a’ fruit monstrueux,” because some of the figs exhibited monstrosities,
reported by Sauvaigo and by Penzig (1922) as the proliferation or superimposition of a
secondary fruit at the apex of a primary one. Both Estelrich and Simonet figure a single
fruit. Lamarck presumed that “this is the one which Miller named, La Grosse Blanche
de Genes, his variety No.4.”
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 395
The tree has 5-lobed leaves, and produces one crop only in southern France. The
following description is taken from that of Simonet.
Second-crop figs pyriform, medium in size, 2-1/2 inches long by 1-3/4 inches broad;
neck prominent, rather slender, up to 3/8 inch in length; stalk medium; ribs present;
eye medium, closed, scales red; color green to golden yellow; meat white; pulp bright
red; seeds small, numerous; quality good. Season late September.
Harraki (syn. Bou-Harraq). Described by Minangoin (1931) from Hammamet,
Tunisia. Leaves medium, thick, very rough, 5-lobed; upper sinuses deep, open. Figs
medium, 1-1/8 by 2 inches, oblate; stalk practically missing; eye open; color citron
yellow; pulp light red.
Ischia Yellow (syn. Cyprus). Described by Miller (1768); his account is closely
followed by most of the same authors listed for Ischia Brown, with the exception of
Eisen. Ischia Yellow is one of the Ischia figs, the identity of which has not been
determined; and the variety has apparently been discarded. The fruit was reported to
be large, pyramidal, yellow in color; pulp dark red.
Kaffi. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Kalaâ Srira, Tunisia. Leaves medium,
glossy above, 5-lobed; sinuses deep and broad. Figs with short, thick neck; ribs present;
eye open; skin thin, light green in color; pulp red.
Kommathri. Described by Badie and Ghamrawi (1931) as a one-crop variety, grown
chiefly near Alexandria.
Tree vigorous, with erect branches. Leaves 5-lobed. Figs large. pyriform; stalk
medium; ribs distinct; skin easily peeled, yellowish green; white flecks prominent; pulp
dark red.
Krawi (syn. Krati at Nazareth). Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a very
good drying fig.
Trees large, producing up to 180 kilos (nearly 400 pounds) per tree. Figs small to
medium, turbinate; neck medium; stalk long; eye small with light brown scales; skin
smooth, light green; pulp red, not juicy; flavor fair.
Lattarola. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as an Italian variety, much cultivated at San
Vito d’Otranto, both for fresh fruit and for drying; briefly described by Ferrari (1912).
The name refers to the abundance of latex or “milk” in various parts of the plant.
Figs medium, oblate; skin thick, checking; color clear yellow; pulp red, very sweet;
seeds numerous.
Limoncello. Described by De Rosa (1911), with a footnote stating that in some
districts it is known as Fico Ottato; however, Dottato is treated elsewhere in his
publication as a distinct variety.
Tree vigorous. Leaves large, 3- to 5-lobed. Figs ovoid, 2-3/4 inches long; stalk short;
skin greenish yellow, with scattered white flecks; eye small, scales yellowish; pulp red;
flavor sweet; seeds large, numerous. Mostly consumed fresh; dried product mediocre.
Lipari (syns. Petite Blanche Ronde, Liparensis, Blanquetto, Esquillarello, Verte Petite,
Bouton du Guêtre). Described by Cupani (1696), Tournefort (1700), Garidel (1715), La
Brousse (1774), Rozier (1805), Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Lamarck (1817), Bory de
Saint Vincent (1824), Couverchel (1839), Noisette (1829), Dochnahl (1855), Hogg (1866),
Société’ Pomologique de France (1887), Barron (1891), and Eisen (1888, 1901).
396 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
The tree bears only one crop, maturing in September. Leaves are small, 3- to 5-lobed.
The following description is after that of Simonet, from fruit grown at Sollies-Pont.
Figs small, 1-3/8 inches long and about the same in diameter, turbinate to
subglobular, with indistinct neck; average weight 22.5 grams; ribs numerous, rather
prominent; stalk up to 1/2 inch long; eye medium, surrounded by a red aureole; scales
rose, flat; skin checking at maturity, uniformly greenish yellow; pulp strawberry; flavor
sweet; quality good.
Martigiano. Described and figured by Baldini (1953) as an Italian variety, producing
one crop only in the district of Carmignano near Firenze.
Trees unusually vigorous; terminal buds green. Leaves 3-lobed, or almost nonlobed;
sinuses very shallow and narrow; base cordate; margin crenate. Figs spherical, without
neck; stalk short; eye small, open, with rosy scales; skin checking at maturity, light
green in color; pulp red; seeds few. Consumed fresh.
Mastroleone (syn. Mastruglione). Described by Guglielmi (1908) as grown
principally in the area of San Vito dei Normanni, Italy. Figs oval; skin green; pulp red,
very sweet. First-crop figs sold fresh; those of the second crop, maturing in September,
are mostly dried.
Meloncella (syn. Melonceddha). Described by Guglielmi (1908) and Vallese (1909),
the latter with illustrations of leaves and fruit. According to Vallese, this variety is
widely grown in Lecce Province, both for fresh fruit and for drying.
Tree large. Leaves both 3- and 5-lobed. Figs pyriform, with neck gradually
narrowing from body to the short stalk; ribs slightly elevated; color greenish yellow;
pulp light rose.
Meou (syns. Figue Mielleuse, Ficus carica mellifera Risso). Described by Risso (1826),
Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), and Simonet et al. (1945). F. carica mellifera was
described by Risso as a fig with luscious fruit, the one of all varieties which in drying
conserves its sweetness without change. Sauvaigo recorded the same variety as Figo de
Meou, apparently a Provençal term. The following description is a complex of accounts
from the sources listed above.
Tree is upright, with 3-lobed leaves. There are two crops.
Brebas large, 2 to 2-1/4 inches in diameter, turbinate; skin thin, checking, greenish
yellow; eye protruding; meat violet; pulp red, very sweet and syrupy.
Second-crop figs globular, up to 2 inches in diameter; stalk short; color pistachio
green; pulp light red. Good for drying, but inferior when fresh.
Monaco (syns. Monaco Bianco, Fico della Lunigiana). Described by Gallesio (1817),
Gasparrini (1845, as Ficus deliciosa var. latifolia), Audibert Frères (1854), Hogg (1866),
Pasquale (1876), Barron (1891), Eisen (1888, 1897, 1901), Wythes (1902), Wright (1894),
Forrer (1894), Stubenrauch (1903), Bunyard and Thomas (1904), Starnes and Monroe
(1907), De Rosa (1911), and Tamaro (1948). Illustrated by Eisen (1901) and by Tamaro.
According to Gallesio, this variety originated in the district of Lunigiana, where the
fruit was highly esteemed. It was grown at Genoa and other places in northern Italy,
but apparently has not been much distributed in France. Hogg reported Monaco
398 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
as a coarse fig, inclined to split, and not a first-rate variety. On the other hand, Wythes
classed it as superior to Brown Turkey in flavor, but not so reliable in production.
Monaco Bianco was introduced into California in the Chiswick collection as P.I. No.
18,853, and fruited at Niles, where Eisen found it to be a very good, juicy fig, splendid
for the table. If it was grown at Chico, no record is available as to its behavior. At
various California stations, reports were conflicting, as the following quotations show:
“Quality is fair to good, and the bearing capacity is large” (Tulare); “The best large fig at
the station” (Pomona); “One of the most useful figs at the station” (Jackson); “Former
recommendation...considerably modified; more than half the crop soured on the tree in
1896” (Pomona). The variety has since disappeared, and no trees are known to exist in
collections.
In Italy the tree is large, with shallowly lobed leaves; it produces two crops. The
following description is from various accounts.
Brebas abundant, especially along the coast, oblong, with prominent neck and very
short stalk; skin green, with white flecks; meat streaked with violet, as in Dottato; pulp
rose-colored, of fine texture; quality excellent.
Second-crop figs (according to Eisen) large, 2-1/2 inches by 2 inches, turbinate,
rounded at the apex; neck very short; ribs narrow, slightly elevated on the body, but not
on the neck; eye wide open, with large, tawny scales; skin dark green; paler on the
sunny side; bloom thin; pulp red; quality good. Consumed mostly fresh, according to
De Rosa.
Monstrueuse (syn. Grosse Monstrueuse de Lipari). Described by Barron (1868c,
1870, 1891), Hogg (1871; with figure), and Eisen (1888, 1901). Illustrated by Barron
(1870) from fruits produced at Chiswick; he reported it as Grosse Monstrueuse de
Lipari, a French variety, comparatively unknown in England. P.I. No. 18,846 of the
Chiswick collection has fruited in several test orchards under the name of Monstrueuse.
Doubt has existed as to the identity of this variety, which, according to Barron, has a
light-brown or chestnut-colored skin in England, while California specimens are green
in color. This discrepancy can be explained by the fact that Barron’s account is of the
brebas only, which in California have a general green color but are commonly flushed
with violet from the underlying colored meat. P.I. No. 18,878, labeled Dr. Hogg’s Clare,
is the same as Monstrueuse. In England it is essentially a “first-bearing” kind, and
rarely yields a second crop.
Cuttings from five different gardens in Washington, D.C., have produced fruit
identical with that of Monstrueuse in test plots in California, demonstrating the fact that
this variety is being successfully grown in the eastern United States. At Riverside,
California, the breba crop is exceptionally good. Second-crop figs are larger and better
in the coastal district of Los Angeles than at Riverside, as pointed out by Condit (1950).
Apparently Monstrueuse was not tested at the early California Experiment Stations,
and only recently have its good qualities recommended it for trial as a dooryard fruit.
The tree is vigorous, with broad, dense top; terminal buds are green. Leaves medium
to large, somewhat glossy above, 3- to 5-lobed, the former predominating; upper
sinuses shallow; base cordate; margins crenate.
Brebas above medium to large, oblique-pyriform, mostly with distinct, thick neck;
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 399
average weight 47 grams; stalk thick, up to 1/2 inch long; eye medium, open, scales
straw color, or tinged with pink; white flecks scattered, prominent; color green, tinged
with violet from the underlying meat; pulp dark strawberry, with a characteristic fig
flavor; quality good. (Plate 19, A.)
Second-crop figs medium or above, up to 2-1/2 inches long and 2 inches in diameter,
turbinate, without neck, or with short, thick neck; average weight 40 grams; stalk up to
5/8 inch long; white flecks large and scattered; ribs narrow, very slightly raised,
showing partly as thin lines of dark green; eye medium, open, scales tawny, erect; color
grass green; pulp very light strawberry, solid, or slightly hollow at center; flavor sweet,
rich; quality good.
Caprified figs somewhat larger, inclined to split at apex; pulp dark strawberry; seeds
numerous. (Plate 19, B.)
Moresca (syn. Gentilla Roussa). Described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as a
variety producing two crops near Nice. Brebas large, oblique pyriform, with long neck;
eye scales red; color gray; pulp pale red. Second crop figs not described.
Moscatel Branco (syn. Pingo de Mel). Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932) as
a Portuguese variety, not grown commercially, but widely distributed in Algarve. The
name Pingo de Mel, “honey-drop,” is sometimes given because of the honeylike gum
which exudes from the eye. The trees generally produce two crops.
Breba crop small; fruits pyriform, with short, thick neck and short stalk; color
yellowish green; pulp red, with traces of violet.
Second crop heavy; figs pyriform to spherical; skin smooth, somewhat puberulent;
color dark green; pulp red; texture fine; quality very good.
Mussega (syns. Cougourdana, Figue Reine, Ficus carica linneana Risso). Described
by Risso (1826), Du Breuil (1876), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901). Grown in southern
France, at Nice, Aix, and Saint-Rémy.
Leaves are large, commonly 3-lobed. Descriptions apply only to figs of the second
crop. These are of medium size, pyriform, with slender neck; skin thin, light green; eye
with red scales; pulp bright red; flavor agreeable.
Mwazi (Northern). Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety distinct
from the Mwazi grown in southern Palestine. Figs large, elongated pyriform, with
prominent neck and medium stalk; eye somewhat open, with purplish scales; skin thin,
glossy, green; pulp light red, containing many large seeds; texture dry; flavor flat.
Neimi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as an Egyptian variety, known in
the northern part of that country as Shuhmani. Figs small, greenish yellow; neck long;
stalk short; eye small, open, scales brownish; pulp light strawberry; seeds many, small.
Noursi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a globular fig; size medium;
color green; eye open, scales yellowish; pulp red; seeds many, small. It is grown in the
Safed Subdistrict of Egypt.
Pajajero. Described by Escribano y Perez (1884) as grown in Murcia, Spain, for its
second crop; used for eating fresh as well as for drying. P.I. No. 58,663, introduced
from Málaga in 1927 as Blanquilla, proved to be the same as Pajajero at Riverside. See
also short account by Condit (1925).
Tree is of medium size. Leaves rather small, shallowly lobed. Figs globular,
400 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
below medium to small, up to 1-1/4 inches long; stalk short and thick; skin color
greenish yellow; pulp rose-colored, juicy and sweet.
Panachée (syns. Figa Turca, Maravilla, Princessa, Rayonne, Courgette Rayée, Jaspée,
Limone, Bourjassotte Panache e, Père Hilarion, Striped, Tiger, Zigarella, Col di Signora
Panachée, Variegato, Fracazzano Rigato, Bracotedesco, Ficus carica radiata Risso, Ficus
pachycarpa var. fasciata Gasparrini). Described by Risso (1826), Gasparrini (1845),
Audibert Frères (1854), Hogg (1866), Pasquale (1876), Barron (1869b, 1891), Soc. Pomol.
de France (1887, 1947), Eisen (1888, 1901), Sauvaigo (1889), Colby (1894), Cusin (1900),
Trabut (1904), Starnes and Monroe (1907), Vallese (1909), Roeding (1914), Borg (1922),
Condit (1921b, 1928b, 1947), Davis (1928), Blin (1942), and Simonet et al. (1945).
Illustrated in color by Barron (1869b) and Condit (1941a). Illustrated in black and white
by Vallese, Condit (1928b, 1941a, fig. 8, D), and Simonet.
In Dendrologia Naturalis, published in 1668, Ulisse Aldrovandi described and
illustrated a fig designated as “ficus virgata fructu,” or virgate fruit, marked with
alternating bands of yellow and green. A translation (courtesy of Mrs. P.H. Timberlake)
of an interesting speculation as to its origin follows: “Whether or not there is any truth
in what Palladius stated in Martins, title 10, to wit, that the bicolored fig sprouts from
two branches (the white and the dark kind) which have been twisted together and
tightly bound, so that the buds are forced to mix their juices, and combine by this means
the distinct peculiarities of both, it is at least not certain that they have ever grown
together naturally.”
It was probably this same fig which Risso described as Ficus carica radiata, and
Gasparrini as Fico Limone.
According to Condit (1928b), the origin of this sectorial chimera has not been learned.
Barron (1869b) described it as a sport from the better-known Col di Signora Bianca, one
of the finest Italian varieties.
Borg reported that this variegated fig, “Tina ta Spanja,” grown at Marsascala in
Malta, is said to be of Spanish origin, and needs caprification. P.I. No. 86,169, obtained
from Lérida, Spain, in 1928, has proved at Riverside to be identical with Panachée, and
to belong to the Common type of figs. Individual trees are found in widely separated
localities of California, but there is little if any interest in extending its culture.
The tree is moderately vigorous and upright in habit of growth; bark of young twigs
commonly tawny or brown, and striped with yellow; terminal buds green. Leaves not
variegated, above medium to large, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth,
rather narrow, lower sinuses shallow, basal sinuses narrow, or in some almost closed;
upper and basal lobes often auricled; margins coarsely crenate; surface dull. The
following description of fruit is from specimens produced at Riverside since 1930.
Brebas none. Second-crop figs medium, up to 2-1/4 inches in length and 2 inches in
diameter; average weight 40 grams; shape pyriform, with neck prominent, and
somewhat flattened in some specimens; stalk to 3/8 inch long; ribs practically absent;
surface glossy, with a delicate bloom; white flecks inconspicuous; eye medium or
above, open, scales variable, from chaffy to light violet; color light yellow, with alternate
bands of green, the latter fading out at complete maturity; meat thick, white;
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 401
pulp strawberry, mealy in texture; quality mediocre to poor. (Plates 8; 26, D.)
Caprified figs are somewhat larger, with pulp blood-red in color. Splitting of fruit
bad, even when uncaprified, as shown in color illustration by Barron.
Passanudo. Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932). Second-crop figs medium,
turbinate or oblate; stalk very short; skin yellowish green, smooth, dull, commonly
checking when mature; pulp carmine, coarse, of agreeable flavor; quality good.
Pecciolo Bianco. Described and figured by Baldini (1953) from Firenze, Italy.
Tree of medium size, with open head and green terminal buds. Leaves mostly 5-
lobed; upper lobes spatulate, lower lobes triangular; base shallowly cordate. Figs
pyriform, with short, slender neck; stalk 5/8 inch in length; eye closed, scales rosy; color
light yellow; pulp red, flavor moderately sweet; seeds many. Highly regarded for table
use.
Pennese. Described by Pasquale (1876) as a light-green to yellow fig, top shaped,
with red pulp. Further listed only by Savastano (1885).
Pero. Described by De Rosa (1911). Leaves large, mostly 3-lobed. Breba crop only
occasionally produced. Second-crop figs medium, pyriform; stalk long; eye large, with
salmon—yellow scales; color green; white flecks numerous; pulp red; seeds numerous,
large. Used mostly fresh.
Perticone. Described and illustrated by Baldini (1953) from Firenze, Italy.
Tree vigorous, with light-green terminal buds. Leaves mostly 5-lobed, the lobes
spatulate and obtuse; upper sinuses deep, moderately open; base cordate; margin
crenate.
Brebas long-pyriform, with indistinct neck; stalk thick, inserted obliquely on the
receptacle; eye large, open; color dark green, flushed with brown toward the apex; light
flecks numerous, prominent; pulp solid, light red; seeds numerous.
Second-crop figs spherical, without neck; stalk thick, short; eye large, open; ribs
indistinct; color light green; light flecks numerous; pulp light red; seeds numerous.
Consumed fresh and dried; also used for processing into marmalade.
Peters White. Local name for an unidentified variety described by Eisen from
Atwater, California. Tree bears two crops of medium-sized green figs; with pink pulp.
Pissalutto (syns. Pissalutto Bianco, Pitalusse, Pittalusse Blanche, Poussouluda,
Sarnese Bianco). Described by Gallesio (1817), Semmola (1845), Pasquale (1876), Du
Breuil (1876), Savastano (1885, probably), Sauvaigo (1889, 1894), Eisen (1888, 1901),
Trabut (1904), Mingioli (1904), Mazières (1920), Blin (1942), Simonet et al. (1945), and
Tamaro (1948). According to Gallesio, Pissalutto is the same variety listed by Pliny and
Columella as “ficus liviana,” one of the best figs of the Roman Era, an identification
which Eisen considered highly doubtful. Sarnese, described by Gasparrini (1845) and
Savastano (1885), is probably the same variety. The fruit is figured by Semmola, Eisen,
and Simonet. Pissalutto is commonly grown in Liguria, and is especially well liked at
Sarzana, where it is called Binello; it is also reported to do well in Tuscany, Corsica, and
402 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Rondella Blanca (syn. Helene). Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica helena, and
referred to as Rondella Blanca by Eisen (1901). Risso stated that the variety was not
much cultivated, as the fruits were very subject to spoilage from insect infestation.
The tree produces two crops. Figs spherical, on a long stalk; eye large, rose-colored;
skin tender, greenish yellow; pulp red, sweet.
Rougette. Described by Hogg (1866) and Eisen (1888, 1901, after Hogg). Figs below
medium, obovate, smooth; eye closed; color coppery yellow on body to yellow on stalk;
pulp red; quality mediocre.
Salerne (syn. Ficus carica salernitana Risso). Described by Bernard (1787), Duhamel
(1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839),
and Eisen (1901). The identity of this variety is somewhat confused. In their accounts
of Salerne, Bernard, Duhamel, and Risso all referred to the Latin description of
Tournefort. The latter, however, gave the common name as La Grosse Blanche Ronde,
which is synonymous with Blanche. Bernard and Duhamel also reported that the fruits
of Salerne were subject to spoilage on account of the open eye, through which rain
water penetrated. Eisen referred to the open eye, but added that the fruit was “not
subject to dropping, or injury by rain.”
Authors generally agree that Salerne trees bear no breba crop. Second crop figs are
described as above medium, globular, with short stalk; skin color pistachio green; pulp
red, flavor agreeable. Very good for drying. Season early.
San Pietro. Described by Trabut (1904), Blin (1942), Société’ Pomologique de France
(1947), and Condit (1947). Illustrated in color by Condit (1941a). In 1901, the United
States Department of Agriculture introduced a variety of fig under P.I. No. 5,919 and
the name San Pietro. It came from Lesina (Hvar) Island, Dalmatia, and was reported to
be an early-season fig of exceptionally large size. Trees at Chico, California, when seen
in August, 1916, were producing medium-sized figs, green in color, with amber pulp.
In 1926, cuttings of San Pietro were obtained from the late Leroy Nickel, of Menlo Park.
These were grown first at Fresno, and since 1932, in the collection of varieties at
Riverside. It was such a satisfactory variety at Menlo Park that “it almost stopped the
quest for a better fig” (according to the gardener, Theodore Woolley), producing two
crops of excellent figs, both under glass and out of doors. The account by Trabut, and
especially that of the Société’ Pomologique de France, leave little doubt that the San
Pietro described by them is the same as the one now under trial in California, which is
treated herewith. However, if the variety does have merit, as the second account states,
it seems strange that other French and Italian horticulturists have not included it in
their publications.
The tree at Riverside is only moderately vigorous; terminal buds are green to dingy
brown. Leaves medium, glossy above, variable, some 3-lobed with shallow sinuses and
broad lobes, others 5-lobed with deep sinuses and long, narrow lobes, both upper and
basal lobes commonly auricled; base cordate; margins very shallowly crenate. (Plate
13.)
Breba crop fair; figs large, up to 2 inches in diameter and 2-3/4 inches in length,
oblique-pyriform, with prominent neck; stalk short; eye medium, open; white flecks
404 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
large, scattered; surface dull; ribs few, only slightly elevated; color light green; meat
thin, tinged with violet; pulp dark strawberry; flavor rich, sweet; quality good.
Second-crop figs large, up to 2-1/4 inches broad and 3 inches long, turbinate, mostly
without neck, or neck present and gradually narrowed from body to stalk; average
weight 73 grams; stalk short; ribs branched, slightly elevated; apex broad, flattened; eye
above medium, open, scales chaffy or pink, with scarious margins; white flecks few,
large, widely spaced; color yellowish green; pulp light strawberry, hollow; flavor fairly
rich. Quality mediocre; dried color poor.
Caprified specimens have dark-strawberry, solid pulp, with large seeds; average
weight 88 grams. Recommended for trial in coastal sections of California only. (Plate
25, A.)
Scaranzone. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as found in the vicinity of Squinzano,
Italy. Figs large, spherical; skin smooth, thick; color yellowish; pulp red, moderately
sweet. Consumed fresh.
Sfari. Described and illustrated by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as the best drying fig
of the Safad Subdistrict; also grown near Nazareth. The name signifies “yellow.”
Figs medium, pyriform, with long neck; eye open, scales pink; color yellow; pulp
light red.
Quality good, especially when dried.
Sharrawi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety grown near Nablus,
Palestine. Figs medium, pyriform; eye almost closed; skin thin, greenish yellow; pulp
light red; flavor subacid; seeds small.
Shtawi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a very late fig, grown in
Samaria and Galilee. Figs pyriform; neck medium; stalk long; eye almost closed, scales
light yellow; color green; pulp red; seeds few, small.
Sicile (syn. Ficus carica siciliana Risso). Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889),
and Eisen (1901), as a Sicilian variety, introduced into France and grown near Nice. The
description by Eisen of first-crop figs follows closely that of previous authors.
Figs large, pyriform, the body abruptly narrowed to form the neck; stalk rather long;
eye large; skin checking, yellowish green in color; meat violet; pulp pale red.
Signorella (syn. Cerva). Described by Ferrari (1912) as a Sicilian variety, having a
light-green skin color and red pulp of a somewhat bitter flavor.
Slati. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a very early variety, grown in
Samaria. Figs small, spherical; stalk long; skin thin; color green; pulp pale red; seeds
numerous.
Sucrada (syn. Ficus carica saccharata Risso, or “sugar fig”). Described by Risso
(1826), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901), as a variety grown in a small way in the Alpes
Maritimes, producing two crops.
Brebas pyriform, greenish yellow, tinged with brown on the ribs. Second crop figs
pyriform; stalk long; eye rose-colored; skin glossy, light green to yellow; pulp pale red.
Flavor very sweet, therefore subject to attacks by birds.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 405
Sulomo. Described by De Rosa (1911), but not recommended for further planting in
Italy. Brebas scarce. Second-crop figs subspherical, 2 inches by 1-3/4 inches; stalk
short; eye rather large, scales yellow; skin green; pulp amber, tinged with rose; seeds
numerous.
Sydawi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a variety found in Acre and
Nazareth subdistricts only; probably introduced from Sidon or Syria. Figs small,
spherical, without neck; stalk fairly long; eye open, scales bright red; skin thick, green in
color; pulp red; seeds few.
Tbani (syns. Tlabi, Jalboushi, Umm-et-Tabat, De’at-el-Arab). Described by
Grasovsky and Weitz (1932). Figs large, elongated; neck and stalk short; eye slightly
open, scales yellowish; color greenish yellow, darker green on the ribs; pulp red. Flavor
sweet and good. Season August.
Tordo. Described by Guglielmi (1908). The name signifies a variety subject to attack
by birds—especially the “tordo,” or thrush—because of the sweetness of the pulp.
Second-crop figs large, oblate, with short stalk; skin thick, glossy; color deep green;
pulp red; seeds numerous, large. Consumed mostly fresh near San Vito, Lecce
Province.
Toscana (syn. Florentina). Description by Sauvaigo (1889), translated by Eisen (1901);
a French variety, producing two crops. Brebas large, oblique-pyriform; eye prominent;
color greenish yellow; pulp amber, streaked with violet, highly flavored. Second-crop
figs not described.
Troiano (syns. Trojano, Campanella). Described by Porta (1583, 1592), Gallesio
(1817), Semmola (1845), Gasparrini (1845, as Ficus leucocarpa), Duchartre (1857),
Pasquale (1876), Savastano (1885), Eisen (1901), Pellicano (1907), Guglielmi (1908),
Vallese (1909), Ferrari (1912), Condit (1947), and Tamaro (1948, with figure).
Illustrations of leaves and fruit are given by Semmola; also by Vallese, who regarded
Campanella as a synonym. Porta, and later Gallesio, considered Troiano to be the same
variety listed by Pliny under the name Livia. In the vicinity of Naples this variety is
extensively cultivated, and is highly esteemed for its production of fruit over a long
season in late summer and fall. Albo, which some authors consider the same as
Troiano, produces two crops, and is treated in this monograph as distinct. A variety
found growing on Smith Island, near Crisfield, Maryland, and grown in the California
collection under the name Smith Island Lemon, has proved to be practically identical
with Troiano.
According to Eisen (1901, p. 65), the “Trojano” was introduced into California by W.
B. West in 1878, but “did not prove satisfactory in Stockton, and was never distributed.”
It was grown and tested at the California Experiment Stations from 1890 to 1903, and at
Pomona was found to be valuable and worth planting in that district. Van Deman
(1890) reported that cuttings of Trojano had been distributed from Washington, D.C.
P.I. No. 40,499, forwarded from Naples in 1915 by Dr. Gustav Eisen as “Troiaro,” was
recommended by him for planting in southern California. The fruits were reported not
to be affected adversely by fall rains, and to be possessed of advantages not found in
any other variety ripening at the same time. Three trees have been located in California
and identified as Troiano; one at Ontario, another at Redwood City, and a third at
Vacaville. A variety imported from Italy prior to 1940 by a San Francisco nursery under
406 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
the name Verdoni, has also proved to be the same as Troiano. It can be recommended
for home planting, especially in coastal districts; but can hardly compete with Dottato
for canning purposes, on account of its strawberry pulp, which will color the syrup in
which it is processed. The figs are too small for a commercial dried product. The
following description is based on the behavior of trees fruiting at Riverside since 1935,
and at Fresno in 1953.
Tree vigorous; terminal buds greenish violet. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy
above, mostly 3-lobed; upper sinuses shallow; base cordate; margins crenate.
Breba crop none. Second-crop figs below medium to small, up to 1-1/2 inches in
diameter, spherical to turbinate; average weight 35 grams; neck mostly absent, or when
present, very short and thick; stalk up to 3/4 inch long, often curved; ribs narrow,
elevated, fairly prominent; eye large, open, scales rose pink; white flecks inconspicuous;
surface dull, with delicate bloom; skin prominently checked crisscross at maturity; color
yellow, sometimes faintly tinged with brown on the exposed side; meat white; pulp
strawberry; quality fair to good. (Plates 8; 12; 26, E.)
Caprified specimens larger, average weight 41 grams; color green; pulp dark
strawberry; seeds fertile.
Unnequi. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a popular variety in
Palestine, used for drying. Figs medium, spherical to oblique-pyriform; stalk long,
distinctively enlarged or swollen near body of the fruit; neck none; eye open, scales
brown; skin green; pulp light strawberry, sweet; seeds numerous; quality fair.
Verdale Blanche (syns. Verdala Blanca, Verdal White, Ficus carica variabilis Risso).
Described by Risso (1826), Eisen (1901), and Simonet et al. (1945), as a variety grown in
Provence. Figs small, pyriform, with long neck; skin light green; pulp blood red.
Verdeal. Described by Mello Leotte (1901) and Bobone (1932), the latter with
illustrations. A Portuguese variety, producing a good second crop in August. Figs
medium, short-pyriform to oblate, with or without short, thick neck; stalk short; color
dark green; pulp carmine; quality fairly good.
Verdino. Described and illustrated by Baldini (1953) from Firenze, Italy, producing
one crop only.
Tree vigorous; terminal buds green. Leaves mostly 3-lobed; sinuses shallow, narrow;
base cordate; margins almost entire. Figs pyriform, with short, slender neck; eye small,
open, with rosy scales; stalk short; skin checking at maturity, dark green in color; pulp
red. Consumed mostly fresh.
Verdone (syns. Grosse Verte, Nebian, Adriatic, White Adriatic, Fico di Fragola,
Strawberry). Described as Verdone by Gallesio (1817), Gasparrini (1845), and West
(1882). Described as Grosse Verte by Audibert Frères (1854) and Barron (1867, 1868a,
with outline drawing). Described as Nebian by Hogg (1866), Wright (1894), and E. A.
Bunyard (1925). Described as Adriatic by Eisen (1885, 1887, 1888, 1897, 1901), Massey
(1893), Forrer (1894), Colby (1894), Earle (1900), Wythes (1902), Starnes (1903), Starnes
and Monroe (1907, with figure), Mills (1914), Roeding (1914), Potts (1917), Roberts
(1917); Condit (1920d, 1921c, 1923, 1933, 1947), Davis (1928), Burger and De Wet (1931),
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 407
Grasovsky and Weitz (1932), and by Woodroof and Bailey (1931). See account and color
plate of Adriatic by Lelong (1890) and by Taylor (1898); trees are figured by Condit
(1933).
In 1727, Richard Bradley reported that he had introduced the Verdone fig into
England from Italy. Almost a hundred years later, Gallesio published a good account of
this variety, then extensively grown in the vicinity of Rome. Gasparrini briefly
described it, giving credit to Gallesio for his earlier account; but other Italian writers
apparently ignore it. Verde Gentil, described by Tamaro (1948) may be the same
variety. The name Verdone (“greenfinch”) was given on account of the green color of
the skin. With the exception of Audibert Frères, who called it Grosse Verte, French
authors omit reference to this variety. The origin and significance of the name Nebian,
used by Hogg, have not been determined. Bunyard stated that Nebian is much grown
in California for drying, under the name Adriatic. Davis, also Burger and De Wet,
report that in South Africa the White Adriatic is a very consistent bearer of figs, good
for jam and for drying. Grasovsky and Weitz state that it produces good crops of high-
quality fruit in Palestine. Barron (1868a) described Grosse Verte as “one of the largest,
handsomest, and richest-flavored varieties in cultivation—well suited for pot culture.”
Starnes found White Adriatic an excellent variety in Georgia.
The following notes on the Verdone (White Adriatic) in California are taken from the
account by Eisen (1901, p.70). The first importation was made by W. B. West from an
English nursery, via Panama, in 1865. Later, Dr. Sposati, of Stockton, is said to have
received the same variety from his native home in Italy under the name Fico di Fragola,
or “strawberry fig.” G. N. Milco found ten-year-old trees growing on the Captain Gray
ranch at Atwater, recognized their value, and labeled them “Adriatic” as stated by
Milco (1885). Milco “did much toward making the variety known, but also much
toward keeping the growers in the dark as regards its true nature. Since 1884 the
variety has been extensively cultivated in California and distributed to many of the
southern states, especially Florida. It is a fine variety in some localities, but in others
worthless.” See also discussion by Milco and others (1887), on varieties.
The Chiswick collection from England included Nebian as P.I. No. 18,863 and Grosse
Verte as P.I. No. 18,876. These two proved to be identical in the plantings at Niles and
Chico. At the California Experiment Stations, from 1893 to 1901, trees of the Verdone
(Adriatic) grew vigorously, but at Tulare they were very susceptible to frost damage,
and the second-crop figs soured badly. (See report of Forrer, 1894.) However,
commercial plantings, made in both the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys, proved
the adaptability of the variety to climatic and soil conditions, and for several decades it
was the largest producer of dried figs in California. The bearing acreage of Verdone
trees in 1953 was 6,921, and in 1952-1953 there were 7,699 tons of dried figs shipped to
the trade. In comparison, the Sari Lop (Calimyrna) acreage was 10,267, and 9,505 tons
were marketed as dried fruit.
Trees of the Verdone planted in dooryards are not so satisfactory for production of
figs for home use as are certain other kinds, on account of the lack of a first crop and the
susceptibility of the fruit to spoilage. In the vicinity of Los Angeles, however, good
408 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
results have been secured by heavy pruning of trees and the resultant production of a
crop which matures late in the season. The influence of climate upon fruit characters is
especially marked in this variety. Condit (1950) states that “figs picked at Merced, in
the interior valley, on September 24, 1949, for example, showed a pulp light strawberry
in color, and a meat thin and white. Figs of the same variety, picked three days later at
Mission San Jose, where the climate is cool, showed the pulp to be blood red and the
meat tinged with violet.”
The following account of Verdone is based on observations of commercial plantings
and of individual trees over a long period, and of trees fruiting in the collection of
varieties at Riverside since 1932.
Trees vigorous, densely branched, with broad, spreading crown. (Plate 2.) (See also
Condit, 1941a, fig. 15.) Terminal buds green. As already pointed out (Condit, 1947,
p.103), leaves of Verdone trees appear a week or ten days before those of Sari Lop and
may, therefore, be seriously injured by late frosts, while leaves of the latter escape
injury. Leaves medium, decidedly glossy above, stiff in texture, mostly 5-lobed; upper
sinuses deep, moderately broad, lower sinuses fairly shallow; base broadly subcordate
to truncate; middle lobe spatulate, with upper margins coarsely crenate, lower margins
entire; leaf mosaic fairly conspicuous, with occasional twigs having badly distorted and
dwarfed leaves, as shown by Condit and Home (1933). (See also plate 13.)
Breba crop very small, or none (crop of 1953 was unusually heavy as the result of
frost damage to terminal buds and the resultant pushing out of lateral fruit buds); figs
medium or above, oblique-pyriform, mostly with prominent neck, up to 3/4 inch long;
stalk thick, sometimes swollen, up to 1/4 inch long; ribs narrow, inconspicuous; white
flecks fairly numerous and prominent; eye medium, scales greenish, with scarious
margins; skin thin, colored greenish violet by the underlying dark-violet meat; pulp
dark strawberry; flavor rich; quality good. (Plates 7; 16, D.)
Second crop good; figs in hot, interior valleys are medium; turbinate, with or without
short, thick neck; average weight 50 grams; stalk up to 3/4 inch long, often somewhat
curved; ribs slightly elevated, but hardly prominent; eye medium, open, scales chaffy,
straw to flesh color, or sometimes pink; surface dull, with delicate bloom; white flecks
large, prominent, widely scattered; color green to greenish yellow; meat thin, white;
pulp light strawberry, somewhat hollow at the center. Flavor fairly rich, of a
characteristic fig type. Quality good, especially for drying. In cool climates figs are
large, grass green outside; pulp blood red; quality excellent. (Plates 8; 16, C.)
Caprified figs are medium or above, deep green; pulp solid, dark red; flavor
peculiarly acid. As many as 1,600 fertile seeds in a single fruit. (Plate 11.)
Verte (syns. Cœur, De Cour, De Cuers, Verdalle, Verdale, Des Dames, Figue
d’Espagne, Trompe-Chasseur, Trompe-Cassaire, Ischia Green, Figue d’Hiver, Ficus
carica aulica Risso). Described as Verte by Merlet (1667), La Quintinie (1692),
Tournefort (1700), Liger (1702), Garidel (1715), Langley (1728), La Brousse (1774), Rozier
(1805), Duhamel (1809), Christ (1812), Lamarck (1817), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824),
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 409
Breba crop small; figs small, 1-1/4 inches in length and diameter, turbinate, with or
without distinct neck; stalk up to 1/2 inch long, and much swollen; ribs few, but well
elevated; eye medium, open, scales pink; color green; pulp strawberry; quality fair.
(Plate 23, C.)
Second-crop figs much the same as brebas, spherical to turbinate, generally without
neck; average weight 12 grams; stalk prominently swollen, up to 1 inch long; ribs
narrow, inconspicuous; white flecks indistinct, scattered; eye medium, scales rose pink;
surface dull, with faint bloom, somewhat puberulent; color green to light yellow; meat
white; pulp strawberry, practically seedless; flavor insipid; quality poor. (Plate 23, D.)
Caprified figs larger, with dark-strawberry pulp and subacid flavor.
Zamozujica. Introduced in 1901 from Lesina (Hvar) Island, Dalmatia, as P.I. No.
5,921, and reported to be a good fig, with unusually tender skin; dried figs shipped in
quantity to Trieste. Trees at Chico, California, were studied in August, 1916, and found
to produce medium fruits, similar to the Pajajero, or so-called “bird fig,” of the Vacaville
district. Variety established at Riverside in 1941 from cuttings received from Angleton,
Texas.
Second-crop figs below medium to small, pyriform, with prominent, short neck; eye
medium, with rose-colored scales; skin color green; pulp strawberry; quality poor.
Zimitza. Described by Colby (1894) and Eisen (1901). According to the latter, it was
introduced into California from Dalmatia; the tree grew well, and produced late in the
season; possibly identical with Natalino (Arneo Bianco).
Figs medium or below, turbinate, with long stalk; neck none; eye closed; color olive
green; pulp amber, with a tinge of red, hollow.
Agulla. Described and illustrated by Estelrich (1910) as a variety bearing fruit similar
to that of Alicantina. Figs small, green, resistant to rain damage; readily dried.
Alicantina (syns. Blancassa, Blanca Clara, Cantina, Blanqueta). Described by
Estelrich (1910), Sanchez (1922), and Priego y Jaramillo (1922).
Tree upright, with 5-lobed leaves; widely planted on the island of Mallorca. Figs
spherical, medium; stalk slender; color green. Highly regarded, both fresh and dried.
Resistant to spoilage in wet weather.
Biter Abiod. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) and Minangoin (1931) as a
variety producing two crops. Listed by Hodgson (1931) and Valdeyron and Crossa-
Raynaud (1950) as good for brebas, which are early, very large, pyriform, and green in
color.
Second-crop figs (according to Minangoin) large, oblate, sessile; eye wide open; skin
very thin, green. Valdeyron states that the second crop sometimes requires
caprification.
Bontalette. Listed by Eisen (1888, 1901) as a “white” fig, used for drying at Brignoles,
France.
412 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Caseta. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910). A variety similar to Parejal, but
fruit smaller, greener in color, and less pulpy. For drying, it is reported superior to
Alicantina, and even more resistant to rain damage. At Pollensa, where it probably
originated, it is highly regarded, and the dried fruit is the first of any variety to appear
in markets.
Castagnola. Described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as a medium sized fig,
globular, bright green in color. Grown near Savoy, France.
Cervone. Listed by Gasparrini (1845), under Ficus deliciosa var. maxima, as a
turbinate fig, yellow in color.
Cistallino. Described by Ferrari (1912) as an Italian variety of medium size,
spherical; skin green, glossy; tree prolific; season early; not much grown.
Comadre. Regarded by Eisen (1901) as the best white drying fig of southern
Portugal. The term “comadre,” however, commonly designates a grade of dried figs,
and not any distinct variety.
Dois à Fôlha. Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932) as a common Portuguese
fig, so named because two figs appear in the axil of each leaf. Figs are globular, with
short stalk and greenish-yellow skin.
Du Japon. Described by Simonet et al. (1945) as a variety that closely resembles
Dalmatia and Blanche Navello. Two crops are produced. Brebas large to very large,
elongated-pyriform. Second-crop figs medium, pyriform, greenish yellow in color;
quality mediocre.
El Nouchi. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a small, spherical fig of
yellow color, rather good in flavor, maturing in August.
Espagnole (syn. D’Espagne). Described by Duchartre (1857), Sauvaigo (1894), and
Eisen (1888, 1901), as a very good, light-green fig, cultivated at Aix, France.
This may be the same as Verte, described elsewhere.
Fettouai. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a fig of medium size,
globular, yellow in color, maturing in August.
Gajico. A variety listed by Pellicano (1907) as a caprified, yellow fig, of little
importance.
Graissane. See Rolland (1914) for synonymy. Described by Garidel (1715), La
Brousse (1774), Rozier (1805), Lamarck (1817), Duhamel (1809), Noisette (1829), and
Eisen (1901). According to Garidel, trees of Graissane are found throughout Provence;
but this is contradicted by Duhamel. The latter briefly describes the fruit as spherical,
flattened at the apex; skin light-colored; flavor insipid.
Hospitalière. Briefly described by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and Eisen
(1888, 1901), as a greenish-yellow fig of Salon, France; good for drying.
Jorba. Described and illustrated by Estelrich (1910) as bearing fruit similar to that of
Alicantina. Figs of small size, green in color, easily dried.
Levant (syn. Turque). Described briefly by Duhamel (1755, 1809); his account
followed by Couverchel (1839) and Eisen (1901). A variety seldom cultivated in France;
leaves deeply lobed; figs large, yellow.
Llimonenca. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a small, lemon colored fig,
spherical in shape, late in maturing; used mostly for cattle feed.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 413
New French. Described by Earle (1900) as a small, spherical, light colored fig, of
medium quality. (Maybe identical with Angélique-see p.382.)
Parejal (syns. Julia in Ibiza, Parechal in Valencia). Described and figured by Estelrich
(1910); see also account by Priego y Jaramillo (1922).
Tree attains considerable size. Leaves 3-lobed. Breba crop small, of little value.
Second-crop figs medium to large, conical; stalk medium, coriaceous; skin checking at
maturity; color dark green; color of pulp not specified. Used for drying and for cattle
feed.
Subvarieties are Parejalina and Parejal Rayada, or Pintada.
Pelosa. Described by Estelrich (1910) as a variety occasionally found in Mallorcan
villages. Called “Pelosa” because of the pubescent skin. Second crop figs medium,
conical, yellowish green; flavor mild. Used for cattle feed. Crop matures by mid-
September.
Pilosella. Described by Ferrari (1912) as a green fig, with short, thick stalk; skin
pubescent; matures in September.
Précoce (syn. Petite Blanche). A variety briefly described by La Quintinie (1692),
Cupani (1696), Liger (1702), and Tournefort (1719), as producing medium-sized, green
fruit, of mediocre quality. According to Liger, it was not much esteemed in France, and
probably was not distributed.
Ragusa (syn. Ragusaine). Described briefly by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876),
and Eisen (1888, 1901), as a light-green fig of fair quality, introduced from Dalmatia into
France. Introduced into California by G. N. Milco, under the name Dalmatian. It was
tested at the California Experiment Stations, and was found at Tulare to resemble “the
Smyrna of California, and the Brunswick, except that it is more flattened and one-sided
in shape.”
Reginella. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as a variety maturing an abundant fall
crop in Lecce Province, Italy. Figs large, oval, greenish yellow in color. Consumed
fresh.
Serra. Described and illustrated by Estelrich (1910) as a variety grown near Pollensa,
Mallorca, mainly for hog feed. Figs below medium, turbinate, without neck; stalk short;
color greenish yellow; pulp of good flavor.
Sextius. Listed by Du Breuil (1876) and Eisen (1888, 1901) as a yellow fig of good
quality, grown near Aix, France.
Sultani. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a large, round, green fig of
good quality, grown in Jenin, Palestine.
Tassiret. Briefly described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a below medium,
yellowish fig, maturing in August in Tunisia.
Tiboulenque (syn. Tibourenque). Listed by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and
Eisen (1888, 1901), as a “white” fig of France, very good both fresh and dried. No fruit
characters given.
Tira (syns. Hortella, Filera). Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a Mallorcan
variety, similar in fruit characters to Alicantina. Second crop figs medium, spherical,
yellow in color; quality excellent for drying.
Vacal. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a Mallorcan fig of minor
importance. Figs medium, oblate-spherical, without neck; eye large; color light green;
white flecks numerous, small. Used for cattle feed and for drying.
414 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
The variety Ronde Noire has proved in California tests to be identical with Osborn in
some plots, and different in others. The description and illustration of Ronde Noire by
Eisen (1901) fit the Archipel closely, even though he stated that it is very distinct from
that variety. In the collection of figs maintained by the late Leroy Nickel at Menlo Park,
the Ronde Noire and Osborn were identical. Neveralla, listed in the 1942 catalogue of
Willamette Fig Gardens, Portland, Oregon, by B. R. Amend, has proved at Riverside to
be identical with Archipel.
Various French growers imported Osborn from England, and issued reports on its
behavior. Among these are the following Anon. (1882), Carrière (1881, 1884), B. Rivière
(1907), and Reboul (1908).
Archipel (Osborn) was tested at the Amador, Tulare, and Paso Robles Experiment
Stations in California between 1889 and 1896, and was reported to produce high-quality
figs in abundance. Individual trees have been found in the foothills of Merced and
Mariposa counties in various localities near San Francisco Bay, and in southern
California.
Trees are upright in habit of growth; terminal dormant buds are green in color.
Leaves above medium, 3- to 5-lobed, the basal lobe sometimes auricled; upper sinuses
of medium depth and width, lower sinuses shallow, basal sinus sometimes narrow and
almost closed, but generally open, forming a cordate base; margins coarsely crenate;
surface somewhat glossy. The following description is from fruit produced at Riverside
since 1930.
Breba crop good. Figs above medium, pyriform, somewhat oblique; neck prominent,
often elongated; stalk short; ribs not prominent, mostly evident as dark-colored bands;
eye medium, open, scales reddish brown; skin cracking or checking at full maturity;
color bronze, tinged with violet; bloom delicate; meat white; pulp cottony white, tinged
with pink; texture spongy or mealy; flavor somewhat strong; quality fair. Of doubtful
value, on account of unattractive color and poor flavor.
Second-crop figs variable in size, from 2 to 2-1/2 inches long and 1-1/2 to 2 inches in
diameter; average weight 58 grams; shape pyriform to turbinate, commonly oblique;
neck thick, up to 3/4 inch long; stalk variable; ribs very slightly elevated, coloring more
deeply than body; eye medium, open, scales light brown, scarious on margins; surface
dull; bloom delicate; white flecks large, scattered, not prominent; color bronze, with
violet tinge; pulp amber, almost seedless; texture mealy, inclined to be somewhat dry;
flavor insipid; quality poor. (Plates 9; 27, D.)
Caprified specimens of larger size; external color darker violet; pulp strawberry,
seedy. Figs practically worthless in interior valleys, either dried or fresh; very much
subject to spoilage. In cool, coastal climates, fruit sizes are larger, and figs are of good
to excellent quality for fresh consumption.
Barbillone. Described by Eisen (1901), Schneider (1902), Juignet (1909), Nomblot
(1913), Mazières, (1920), A. Rivière (1928), Société Nationale d'Horticulture de France
(1928), Delplace (1933), Delbard (1947), and Evreinoff (1947). Illustrated in color by
Delbard. Origin uncertain, but reported to be a bud sport of Blanche, and named for
the grower at Argenteuil who found it.
Tree productive of brebas; second crop small.
416 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Brebas medium to large, variable in shape, but commonly pyriform; ribs distinct;
stalk short; eye large, with protruding scales; skin thin, easily peeled, greenish violet in
color; pulp amber, tinged with red. Quality very good, superior to that of Blanche for
fresh fruit.
Second-crop figs medium; neck lacking; eye small, open, with dark-colored scales;
skin thin, violet-black; pulp amber, coarse, juicy.
Beall. Described by Brooks and Olmo (1946) and by Condit (1947). A chance
seedling, found by W. A. Beall in the Santa Clara Valley, California, and transplanted by
him to Fresno, where it fruited in 1922. Characters suggest Archipel (Osborn) as the
female parent; variety reported well worthy of planting in desert valleys and in coastal
climates for the production of fresh fruit.
Tree moderately vigorous, bearing two crops; terminal buds violet-brown. Leaves
medium or larger, dull to slightly glossy above, mostly 5-lobed; upper and lower
sinuses of medium depth and width; basal lobes often auricled; base cordate, the sinus
generally narrow; margins crenate. Fruit descriptions are from Riverside, California,
specimens.
Brebas large, up to 3 inches long by 2-1/4 inches in diameter, pyriform, with
prominent, thick neck; average weight 71 grams; stalk thick, up to 1/4 inch long; eye
medium, open; white flecks scattered, fairly conspicuous; color brown to purplish black,
shading to green on the neck; pulp white; flavor fairly rich; quality good. (Plate 18, C.)
Second-crop figs medium to large, oblate to turbinate, with or without a short, thick
neck; average weight 66 grams; stalk short and thick; ribs elevated, more deeply colored
than body; eye medium, open, with violet scales; surface somewhat glossy, with distinct
bloom; white flecks large, conspicuous; color claret-brown to coppery black, lighter
toward the stalk; skin checking at maturity; pulp amber, hollow at center; flavor fairly
sweet and rich. (Plates 16; 18, D.)
Caprified figs with light-strawberry pulp and large, fertile seeds; dried figs of poor
color and quality.
Brunswick (syns., after Hogg and Eisen: Bayswater, Boughton, Black Naples, Brown
Hamburgh, Clare, Clémentine, De Saint Jean, Hanover, Madonna, Large White Turkey.
Also Magnolia, Dalmatian). Described by Duhamel (1755), Miller (1768), Hanbury
(1770), Brookshaw (1812), Anon. (1828), George Lindley (1831), John Lindley (1841),
Rogers (1834), Morren (1852), Holley (1854), M’Intosh (1855), Thompson (1859), Hogg
(1866), White (1868), Barron (1868c, 1891), James Anderson (1874), Hyde (1877), West
(1882), Massey (1893), Burnette (1894), Wright (1895), Forrer (1894), Eisen (1885, 1897,
1901), Earle (1900), Price and White (1902), Starnes (1903), Starnes and Monroe (1907),
Van Velzer (1909), Hume (1915), Potts (1917), Gould (1919), Cook (1925), Mowry and
Weber (1925), Davis (1928), Traub and Fraps (1928), E. A. Bunyard (1925, 1934), Stansel
and Wyche (1932), Condit (1921b, 1922b, 1941b, 1947), Arnold (1926), Fruit-Grower
(1936), Woodard (1938, 1940), Delbard (1947), and Preston (1951). Illustrations of the
fruit in color are by Brookshaw, Anon. (1828), John Lindley, Morren, and James
Anderson. Illustrations in black and white are by Potts, Price, Traub, E. A. Bunyard,
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 417
and Condit (1941a fig. 2, L). Leaves are figured by Eisen, Price, Van Velzer, Gould,
Traub, and by Woodroof and Bailey.
Brunswick is another variety about which considerable confusion has existed. Much
of this arises from the fact that most English descriptions and illustrations deal with the
first-crop fruit, which horticulturists in the United States have found so different from
figs of the main crop. Furthermore, as Eisen stated in 1901, this variety is erroneously
known in California and parts of the South as Brown Turkey; in fact, price quotations of
fresh figs in the Los Angeles markets still refer to Brunswick when the actual variety on
sale is San Piero (Brown Turkey).7 This variety has apparently been widely distributed
in fig-growing countries, and various names have been attached to it. Cuttings of the
following numbers have fruited at Riverside, and all were found to be identical with
Brunswick.
Baidi—P.I. No. 80,294, from Palestine.
Belle Dame—P.I. No. 69,010, from France.
Belle Dame Blanche—P.I. No. 86,790, from Yalta, Crimea.
Blanche d’Argenteuil—P.I. No. 92,304, from France.
Brunswick—P.I. No. 93,276, from England.
Col di Signora—P.I. No. 102,099, from Morocco.
Dalmatia—P.I. No. 102,010, from Morocco.
Dor—P.I. No. 101,715, from the Caucasus.
Kennedy—P.I. No. 69,017, from France.
Kennedy—P.I. No. 102,015, from Morocco.
Khurtmani—P.I. No. 80,297, from Palestine.
Magnolia, from Texas; cuttings from local trees at Greenwich, Connecticut; also, from
the vicinity of Washington, D.C.
Reference to descriptions of some of these varieties found elsewhere in this report
will show that the names are not synonyms of Brunswick; therefore, the material was
sent incorrectly identified. Castle Kennedy is similar to Brunswick, but is generally
regarded as a distinct variety.
According to Rogers, the Brunswick “was introduced in the early days of Miller
under the name of Madonna, which ought never to have been changed; but on the
accession of George I, it was named as above.” Lindley used the name Brunswick in
preference to Madonna because it was the better known of the two. The name
“Magnolia” appeared in a publication by Thomas Affleck in 1854 as a synonym of
Jaune, a French fig. Sometime previously, a tree peddler had gone through parts of
Texas offering magnolia trees for sale; when planted, it was found that the trees
produced figs rather than magnolia leaves and flowers, hence the name of the variety.
Van Velzer stated that Brunswick had many pet names, among them Magnolia,
Hanover, and Madonna. He added: “Those who still contend that the Magnolia is a
new variety, distinct from the Brunswick, can discover their error by studying the
leaves, bark, wood, and fruit, which have characteristics and habits that distinguish it
from all others. Some nurserymen profit from this misconception by buying cuttings of
Brunswick trees at a much lower price than is asked for Magnolia wood, and selling
them afterward as the same stock.”
_______________
7 For further comments regarding confusion in this synonymy, see descriptions of Brown Turkey (page 428) and
San Piero (page 467).
418 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Osborn Prolific (Rust). Two or three decades ago, the Edward H. Rust Nurseries,
Pasadena, California, obtained some fig cuttings from a tree peddler who said that the
variety was originally from England. The nursery propagated the material, and
eventually distributed it under the name Osborn Prolific. Trees have been located in a
few dooryards at Arcadia, San Gabriel, and Pasadena, and scions have fruited at
Riverside since 1950. Brebas are seldom produced. The main crop, however, ripens
over a long season, and is highly regarded for fresh-fruit consumption.
Leaves above medium, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth, lower
sinuses shallow, basal sinuses broad; base sometimes truncate, usually cordate; upper
margins coarsely serrate, lower margins entire.
Second—crop figs above medium, pyriform, with body 2 inches long by 1-3/4 inches
in diameter; average weight 40 grams; neck thick and short, or often slender, and up to
1 inch long, decidedly flattened, also curved; stalk slender, up to 1 inch long, allowing
the fruit to hang with the apex downward; ribs narrow, slightly raised; eye medium or
above, open; white flecks few, elongated, inconspicuous; surface somewhat glossy, skin
checking crisscross at complete maturity; bloom delicate; color bronze to violet-brown;
meat white; pulp amber, or light strawberry, somewhat hollow; flavor sweet and rich;
seeds medium; quality fair. (Plate 28, B.)
Reggitana. Described by Ferrari (1912) as a variety from Reggio, Calabria, hence the
name. Figs rather elongated; color black; pulp amber.
Roja (syn. Rojal). Described and illustrated by Estelrich (1910) as a variety which
produces brebas in abundance near Algaida, Mallorca; these appear in quantity in the
markets of Palma. Also described by Priego y Jaramillo (1922). Figs of the main crop
are resistant to rain damage, and are highly regarded for their quality; the variety is
therefore cultivated in all the Balearic Islands.
Brebas large, egg-shaped; stalk thick; skin color reddish brown; pulp amber.
Second-crop figs much the same, maturing in August and September.
Two subvarieties are given. The first, Roja d’en Bardina, rarely produces brebas. The
second, Roja de Son Suau, produces no brebas, while the main crop figs are of a darker
red color than are those of Roja.
Russello. Described by Pasquale (1876, with figure) and Pellicano (1907) as a late-
season Italian fig, of medium size, pyriform, yellowish brown in color; pulp amber.
Scavello (syn. Nero). Described by Ferrari (1912) as a variety widely grown in Italy,
especially at altitudes up to 2,109 feet. Breba crop good. Second-crop figs turbinate,
reddish violet; pulp amber. Consumed both fresh and dried. Season late.
Common-type Figs with Skin Dark (Various Shades of Red, Brown, or Violet to
Black); Pulp Various Shades of Red
Adam. Described by Eisen (1888, 1901), Barron (1891), Davis (1928), and by Burger
and De Wet (1931). P.I. No. 18,873, introduced from England as Adam, proved to be
identical with Dauphine; P.I. No. 102,003, from Morocco, also labeled Adam,
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 421
produced small green figs of no value. Apparently this is a French variety, the original
name having been lost; said to be desirable on account of its good first crop.
Brebas above medium, turbinate, with medium neck; eye large; skin dull green, with
violet flush; pulp amber-white.
Second-crop figs medium, ribbed; color yellowish brown; pulp dull amber to red.
Useful for dessert in South Africa.
Albacor de Grá and Albacor Comun. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as
black, oblong figs with red pulp; subvarieties of Albacor. The second is well regarded
on account of its abundant main crop, good for drying.
Amarouna (syn. Ficus carica amara Risso). Second crop only described by Risso
(1826), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901). Figs medium, pyriform; skin reddish brown,
checking at maturity; eye prominent; pulp red, of a bitter taste; seeds many.
Asqalawi—Asmar. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a medium sized
black fig, distinguished by a bright-red circle around the open eye; pulp pink, rather
dry; seeds few
Aubane. Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica aubana. A variety grown rarely in
southern France. Figs medium, pyriform; skin rather thick and tough, checking
crisscross; color light green, tinged with reddish violet; pulp light red.
Azaich. Described and illustrated by Mauri (1939b, 1942). Crop matures sooner than
that of the Smyrna-type Averane, which is an advantage under some conditions of
culture and climate. Listed by Hanoteau and Letourneux (1872) and Eisen (1901) as a
common fig, bearing two crops.
Tree rather vigorous and productive; leaves generally 5-lobed; petiole usually tinged
with carmine.
Figs pyriform, somewhat oblique; neck thick and prominent; stalk short; eye
medium, with rosy scales; color black; pulp red. Quality good, both fresh and dried.
Bacorinho. Described and figured by Bobone (1932) as commonly grown at Loulé’,
Portugal. Figs turbinate; stalk short; skin green, with obscure violet tint; pulp carmine,
coarse; quality good.
Bargemon. Described by Bernard (1787), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Eisen
(1901), and Leclerc (1925). Figs small, oblong to subglobular; skin pale violet, on a
yellow background; pulp red. Quality excellent, both fresh and dry. Season late.
Barnissenca (syns. Bernissenca, Bernard, Bernissenque, Barnissenquo, Martinenca,
probably Vernisingue or Vernissenque, Ficus carica bernardi Risso). Described by
Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839),
Escribano y Perez (1884), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1888, 1901), Estelrich (1910), Sanchez
(1922), Priego y Jaramillo (1922), and Simonet et al. (1945). See the account of Sarreigne
in this monograph, regarding the confusion of that variety with Barnissenca. The latter
is a fig of Provence, reported to do best in a moist, rich soil, and apt to drop its fruit
when grown on drier ground. Risso gives the season of maturity as September to
December. Sauvaigo emphasizes this by stating that Barnissenca is one of the varieties
422 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
in which late figs of the second crop may remain on the tree during the winter,
maturing in the spring. As pointed out under the description of Sarreigne, the variety
Barnissenca is properly referred to as Ficus carica bernardi of Risso, and not to F. carica
garideli, as given by Sauvaigo, and later by both Eisen and Simonet. Martinenca is
described and figured by Estelrich, with Bernissenque as a synonym; on account of its
quality and resistance to bad drying weather in the fall, growers on the Balearic Islands
call it the “queen of black figs.”
Vernisingue has been described by Merlet (1667), Ballon (1692), Liger (1702), Langley
(1728), Bradley (1757), Hanbury (1770), Christ (1812), Audibert Frères (1854), Hogg
(1866), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Eisen (1888, 1901), and by Starnes and
Monroe (1907, with illustration).
Merlet called it Vernisingue, a name which Liger stated was very plainly invented.
The spelling Vernissenque was adopted by both Hogg and Eisen. The latest account,
that of Société’ Pomologique de France, lists it as Vernissangue, with Vernissenque as a
synonym, and agrees with most early authors that the external color of the fig is ashy
violet or violet-brown. Eisen, however, followed Hogg in describing the skin as
perfectly black, without a trace of lighter color. All of this leads to the conclusion that
the identity of Vernissenque is very much in doubt. The evidence seems to point to the
conclusion that it is the same as Barnissenca, in spite of the fact that Eisen (1901)
reported it to be “a distinct and well-characterized fig, superior in flavor to the small,
round Verdal, which it somewhat resembles.”
The tree of Barnissenca bears a second crop only. No records of its occurrence in
California have been found. Description of fruit is compiled from accounts of various
authors.
Figs medium or below, about 1-1/4 by 1-1/2 inches, oblique-spherical; skin thin,
adhering to the pulp; color violet-brown; pulp bright red; texture watery; quality
mediocre.
Barnissotte (syns. Bellegarde, Bernissou Negra, Bourjassotte Noire Bouriageotte,
Brogiotto Fiorentino, Brogiotto Nero, Précoce Noire, Burjassotte Preto, Grosse
Bourjassotte, Grosso Figo, Monacello, Ficus polymorpha var. depressa Gasparrini, F.
carica barnissota Risso). Described by Tanara (1651), Merlet (1667), Cupani (1696),
Garidel (1715), Tournefort (1719), La Brousse (1774), Bernard (1787), Rozier (1805),
Duhamel (1809), Gallesio (1817), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Risso (1826), Noisette
(1829), Couverchel (1839), Semmola (1845), Dochnahl (1855), Duchartre (1857), Hogg
(1866), Du Breuil (1876), Roda (1881), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Barron (1891),
Eisen (1888, 1897, 1901), Sauvaigo (1889, 1894), Massey (1893), Mello Leotte (1901),
Starnes and Monroe (1907), Tschaen (1908), Estelrich (1910), Nomblot (1913), Rolet
(1916), Mazières (1920), Borg (1922), Sanchez (1922), Priego y Jaramillo (1922), Leclerc
(1925), Bois (1928), Bobone (1932), Simonet et al. (1945), Simonet and Chopinet (1947),
Condit (1947), Delbard (1947), Evreinoff (1947), and Baldini (1953). Color illustration by
Duhamel; also by Simonet (1947). Figured in black and white by Semmola, Estelrich,
Starnes and Monroe, and Baldini.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 423
Barnissotte is widely grown in Italy, in southern France, and in parts of Spain and
Portugal; it is the same variety described by Pliny and other Roman writers as “Fico
Africano,” according to Gallesio, who regarded it as one of the best figs, exquisite in
quality. P.I. No. 18,889, of the Chiswick collection, labeled Negro Largo, bore fruit
identical with that of Barnissotte. In 1926, this variety (Barnissotte) was introduced into
California from southern France as P.I. No. 69,009, but has been planted only in variety
collections. The description and illustration of Brogiotto Nero by Baldini apparently
represent a variety somewhat different from Barnissotte.
The tree of Barnissotte is vigorous, with brown terminal buds. Leaves medium to
large, glossy above, mostly 5-lobed; middle lobe elongated, broadly spatulate,
sometimes auricled; upper sinuses deep in some, of medium depth in others, lower
sinuses shallow; base cordate; margins coarsely crenate. Fruit description is from
specimens at Los Angeles and Riverside.
Brebas rare, above medium to large, pyriform, purplish black; pulp strawberry.
Second-crop figs medium to large, but variable in size and shape, from 1-1/2 to 2-3/4
inches in length, and from 1-1/2 to 2 inches in diameter; shape turbinate-pyriform,
sometimes oblique, with broad apex; average weight 50 grams; neck variable, either
prominent and somewhat flattened, thick, and short, or indistinguishable from body;
stalk thick, short, loosely attached, allowing many figs to drop when not quite ripe; ribs
elevated, narrow, prominent on account of deeper coloration; eye medium, open, scales
erect, chaffy; surface somewhat glossy, with distinct, pruinose bloom; white flecks large
and conspicuous, as shown by Condit (1941a, fig. 9, A); color purplish black on apex
and body, lighter toward the stalk, some specimens with green color persisting in
irregular patches on body and apex; meat white; pulp light strawberry; flavor fairly
sweet and rich. Quality good to excellent, especially in coastal climates. (Plates 10; 27,
A.)
Caprified figs larger, subject to spoilage by splitting, souring, and endosepsis; pulp
dark strawberry to blood red.
Bec de Perdrix. Described by Hogg (1866) and Eisen (1888, 1901) as a good drying fig
of Spain and southern France, of medium size, pyriform, with purple skin and dark-red
pulp.
Becuelle (syn. Bucuelle). Described by Simonet et al. (1945) as given below. Found
under the name Coucourelle à Plascassier, but differing from the variety described by
Eisen (1901) under Coucourelle Gavotte.
Tree bears two crops. Brebas small, elongated-pyriform; neck prominent; skin
reddish violet; pulp of fine texture, solid, red; flavor sweet; quality very good. Second-
crop figs similar, with sizes somewhat smaller. Good for drying.
Bellona (syns: Bellone, Belloune, Ficus carica bellona Risso). See Rolland (1914) for
synonymy. Described by Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824),
Risso (1826), Couverchel (1839), Hogg (1866), Sauvaigo (1889), Colby (1894), Eisen (1901,
after Sauvaigo), Rolet (1916), Mazières (1920), Leclerc (1925), Bois (1928), Simonet et al.
(1945), Simonet and Chopinet (1947), and Evreinoff (1947).
424 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Tree with drooping branches; producing two crops; leaves large, deeply 3- to 5-lobed.
Extensively grown in Provence, where it is reported by Sauvaigo to be the queen of figs;
excellent both fresh and dried. Description of fruit is after Simonet, from specimens
secured at Antibes.
Brebas rare, or none, medium, pyriform; neck well marked, often curved; ribs
prominent; color violet-gray; pulp red.
Second crop abundant; figs broadly oblique-pyriform, flattened at the apex; ribs
elevated; eye small, closed, scales erect, violet; skin purplish black, checking at maturity;
pulp red, with numerous small seeds; quality excellent.
Betada. Described by Hogg (1866) as a small, spherical, black fig, with rose-colored
pulp of rich flavor.
Bidh-el-Djemel. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929), and by Minangoin
(1931); the latter as Biddin-el-Djemel, from Menzel Temine, Tunisia. Leaves small, 3-
lobed. Figs below medium; eye open; skin very thin, violet in color; pulp hollow, of
wine-red color.
Biter Akhal. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Ras-el-Djebel, Tunisia, as
producing two crops in a year. Leaves below medium, 5-lobed. Figs oblate, 1-1/4
inches in length and 2 inches in diameter; stalk very short; eye wide open; skin of fine
texture, wine red in color; pulp light red.
Blavette. Described by Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824),
Noisette (1829), and Couverchel (1839). Eisen (1901) listed Blavette as a synonym of
Cotignana, but earlier authors make no mention of such a synonymy.
The figs of Blavette are oblong, violet in color, with deep-red pulp, and are very
much subject to dropping. This fault apparently accounts for the lack of interest in the
variety.
Bocarde. Described by Eisen (1888, 1901) as a French fig, medium in size, dark
brown in color, with bright-red pulp; quality very good.
Bondance Précoce. Described and illustrated by Eisen (1901) as a pyriform fig, below
medium, brown in color, with light-red pulp of fine quality.
Bordeaux (syns. Angélique Black or A. Noire, Petite Figue Violette, Albicougris,
according to Eisen, Figue de Bordeaux, Violette, Violette de Bordeaux, Figue Poire,
Petite Aubique, Figuo Aubiquoun, Negronne). In 1692, a description by La Quintinie
(translated by Evelyn) referred to the Angélique fig as “of a violet color and long but
not very big, the pulp red and reasonably good.” Both Cupani (1696) and Tournefort
(1700) described Angélique as a violet fig. Yet most later authors, from Duhamel (1768)
on, refer to this variety as bearing yellow fruit. It seems proper, therefore, to denote the
former as Angélique Black, leaving the name Angélique for the variety described
elsewhere in this monograph. Eisen (1901) gave a short account (after Barron, 1891) of
Angélique Noire, a dark fig with bright-red pulp.
It is probably this variety with dark fruit which was described as Figue de Bordeaux,
Violette, or Violette de Bordeaux by Liger (1702), Merlet (1740), Duhamel (1768),
Weston (1770), La Brousse (1774), Le Berryais (1789), Mirbel (1802), Noisette (1821),
Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), George Lindley (1831), Couverchel (1839), Thompson
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 425
(1859), Forney (1863), Hogg (1866), Du Breuil (1876), Barron (1891), Eisen (1888, 1901),
Price and White (1902), Leclerc (1925), and E. A. Bunyard (1925). Negronne was
described by Garidel (1715), Rozier (1805), Lamarck (1817), Bernard (1787), Duhamel
(1768, 1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Eisen
(1901), and E. A. Bunyard (1925).
Barron (1891) regarded Negronne to be the same as Violette de Bordeaux. Eisen
believed that the two were not identical, but very similar, except for the smaller leaves
of the latter. Bunyard (1925) agreed with Eisen, and stated that Violette de Bordeaux
resembled Negronne, but was a distinct variety. In regard to the stalk of Negronne,
Eisen reported, “stalk and part of neck bent over and rising in a curve upward, where
the fig hangs down.” This unique character is difficult to describe, but Eisen’s
statement confirms the opinion that Violette de Bordeaux of our collection is the same
as Negronne of early authors. As grown at Riverside, however, Bordeaux does not
show the green color persisting on the neck or base of the mature fruit, which Duhamel
(1768) found characteristic of the variety in France. Variety No.26 of Duhamel (1809),
described as Figue Poire, Figue de Bordeaux, and Petite Aubique (Figuo Aubiquoun in
Provence), is here considered to be the same as Angélique (Black) of Cupani and
Tournefort. Duhamel described Negronne under his No.33, and referred to the
previous accounts of Garidel and Bernard. Under Bordeaux, Eisen stated: “A
distinction must be made between the Petite Aubique and the Aubique, the former
being identical with our Bordeaux, the latter with Black San Pedro, which is
synonymous with Grosse Violette de Bordeaux.” (See p.467.)
In 1715, Garidel reported that Negronne was found in nearly all the vineyards and
fields near Aix. Duhamel and later authors, including Leclerc, assert that Figue de
Bordeaux is grown in the vicinity of Paris, where it produces two crops in warm
seasons. According to Eisen, Bordeaux is common around Bordeaux and Nagronne, in
southern France. Lindley said it was then cultivated throughout France. Bunyard
regarded the tree of Negronne as very prolific in England, and the fruit to be of
excellent quality. Fruits of Bordeaux are illustrated by Duhamel (1768), Noisette (1821,
in color), Du Breuil (1876), Rozier (1805), Wright (1894, in color), Eisen (1901), and by
Price and White (1902). See also: The Garden 41:333 (1892).
Negronne was introduced into California from England as P.I. No. 18,839 of the
Chiswick collection. At Niles, Chico, and Fresno it proved to be identical with Violette
de Bordeaux, which was obtained in 1921 from the collection of Leroy Nickel at Menlo
Park. Grosse Violette de Bordeaux, introduced as No. 18,844 of the Chiswick collection,
produced fruit indistinguishable from that of Violette de Bordeaux, confirming the
opinion of Barron (1891) that they were the same, but contradicting that of Eisen,
mentioned above. No records have been found of tests of this variety at the California
Experiment Stations. A tree, located at Santa Barbara in 1932, was identified as
Bordeaux, and other trees are occasionally found in dooryards. Price and White found
the tree of Bordeaux to be vigorous and prolific in Texas, but the fruit was insipid and
the quality poor. Cuttings of a tree growing at 597 Columbia Road, N.W., Washington,
426 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
D.C., have produced fruit in California identical with that of Bordeaux. At Portland,
Oregon, Negronne produces two crops of black figs, good in quality.
Bordeaux is similar to Ischia Black, but differs from it in leaf and fruit characters.
Leaves of Ischia Black are small, nonlobed or 3-lobed, surface dull; those of Bordeaux
are medium, 3- to 5-lobed, deeply cleft, surface glossy. Duhamel described the leaves of
Violette as smaller than those of Blanche, and divided deeply into five parts or lobes,
with the borders markedly dentate. Figs of Ischia Black do not have the peculiar thick
and crooked stalk that is characteristic of the Bordeaux fruit stalk. The small, immature
fruits of both varieties show a distinctive early coloration of a reddish-brown hue, in
contrast to fruits of Franciscana (Mission), which change to a black color just before
reaching full size and maturity. The following description is from trees which have
fruited at Riverside since 1930, and at Fresno in the season of 1953.
Tree rather dwarf in comparison with trees of Franciscana or Dottato; terminal buds
violet-purple to brown in color. Leaves with upper surface glossy; base truncate to
shallowly cordate; middle lobe narrowed toward its base, lateral lobes broad; margins
coarsely serrate.
Breba crop fair to good; figs medium, up to 2-1/2 inches long and 1-3/4 inches in
diameter, pyriform, with thick, gently tapering neck; average weight 36 grams; stalk
variable, often thick or swollen toward body of the fruit, not straight, but commonly
curved or bent at an angle, as mentioned above, up to 3/4 inch long, sometimes cracked
or split on one side, the crack extending from stalk into the neck; ribs prominent, well
elevated; eye medium, scales same color as body, which is purplish black; meat white,
tinged with violet; pulp strawberry, rich; quality very good. (Plate 25, D.)
Second-crop figs small to medium, up to 1-3/4 inches long and 1-1/2 inches in
diameter, spherical, or pyriform to obovate, often oblique; average weight 27 grams;
neck missing, or when present, short and thick; stalk up to 5/8 inch long, peculiarly
curved, as in brebas as shown by Condit (1941a, fig. 4, E), purplish in color; eye
medium, open, scales purple; color purplish black on both body and neck; bloom
commonly on basal half of fruit, but not on body or apex, characterized by Eisen (1901)
as “a distinct and fine blue bloom confined to the neck, ending sharply halfway to the
equatorial”; white flecks large, scattered, eventually masked by dark body color; skin
somewhat glossy, purplish black when fully mature; meat white; pulp strawberry,
fairly rich in flavor. (Plates 10; 25, E.)
Caprified specimens much the same, somewhat larger in size; pulp dark strawberry,
subacid in flavor; seeds numerous,
This variety is inferior to Franciscana (Mission) for commercial planting, on account
of smaller size of fruit; good for home planting, as tree is dwarf and prolific in fruit
production.
Bouche-barrique (syn. Tapa Cartin Negra, Ficus carica clausa Risso). Described by
Risso (1826); listed by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901). Second-crop figs medium,
oblong, gradually narrowed toward the stalk; skin glossy, black; pulp red; flavor
agreeable.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 427
somewhat open, with violet scales; skin glossy, slightly pubescent, reddish violet,
lighter toward the stalk; pulp red, sweet; seeds rather numerous; quality good. Second
crop not observed.
Briasca Doussa (syns. Bouffros, Ficus carica dulcissima Risso). Described by Bernard
(1787), Duhamel (1809, with color illustration), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel
(1839), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), and Simonet et al. (1945). Fruit reported to mature
early, and not much inclined to drop prematurely; therefore trees are commonly
planted near Draguignan. Two crops, June and September. Description is after that of
Risso.
Leaves 3-lobed. Figs similar to those of Ficus carica nigra, or Negrette, but with
longer stalk, more oblate shape, and redder pulp. Size small; shape oblong, with
rounded apex; skin glossy, violet-black; pulp amber in the
spring crop, reddish in figs of autumn; quality mediocre.
Brignolenque. Described by La Brousse (1774) as a variety grown at Saint-Esprit,
France. Figs very large, black, with red pulp; quality good, both fresh and dried.
Brown Turkey (syns., according to Hogg: Ashridge Forcing, Blue, Common Blue,
Blue Burgundy, Brown Italian, Brown Naples, Long Naples, Early Howick, Italian
Large Blue, Lee’s Perpetual, Murrey, Small Blue, Fleur Rouge, Walton). Described by
numerous authors, beginning with Miller (1768). Others are as follows: Hanbury (1770),
Brookshaw (1812), George Lindley (1831), Rogers (1834), M’Intosh (1855), Dochnahl
(1860), Thompson (1859), Hogg (1866), White (1868), G. S. (1869), Barron (1868c, 1891),
Hyde (1877), Coleman (1880, 1887b), Eisen (1885, 1888, 1901, probably confused),
Wythes (1890a, 1900a), W. I. (1893), Wright (1895), Burnette (1894), Price and White
(1902), Starnes (1903), Starnes and Monroe (1907), Ward (1904), McHatton (1909),
Reimer (1910), Royal Hort. Society (1916), Potts (1917), Gould (1919), flume (1915), Cook
(1925), Mowry and Weber (1925), E. A. Bunyard (1925, 1934), Arnold (1926), Fruit-
Grower (1936), Ashley (1940), Woodard (1940), Beckett (1941), Anon. (1944), Condit
(1947), and Preston (1951). Illustrated in color by Brookshaw, Hyde, and Coleman.
Illustrated in black and white by Wythes (1900a), Price and White, Anon. (The Garden
63: 427, 1903), Bunyard (1934), and Beckett.
According to a writer in the Gardener’s Chronicle, March 25, 1843, French growers
have called this fig La Perpétuelle, a name corrupted in England to Lee’s Perpetual.
Sources of other such names have not been found. It should be emphasized also that
the name “Brown Turkey” has been commonly used for two distinct varieties; one, the
English Brown Turkey, and the other, California Brown Turkey. The latter is properly
referred to as “San Piero.”
John Rogers (1834) stated: “Miller in the fourth edition of his Dictionary just mentions
the ‘long purple fig,’ though Whitmill (an eminent gardener of his day, and to whom
Miller owed much for his early knowledge of gardening), in his list or book, published
in 1726, calls it ‘Whitmill’s Early Purple’; but which was neither more nor less than the
‘long purple’ of Miller. This little bit of vanity in Whitmill—to gain a sale for his trees,
or a little celebrity to his name—has been too much practiced by many who were by
nature his juniors, and professionally by far his inferiors.”
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 429
The Brown Turkey that was described by Miller to be “so well known as to need no
description” is undoubtedly a European variety, introduced into England and given a
local name without reference to origin. The synonyms, Brown Naples, Long Naples,
and Italian, indicate that it came from Italy, but it has not yet been identified with any
variety from that country. For more than two centuries, however, this fig has stood at
the head of the list of English varieties for general cultivation, both outdoors and under
glass. Coleman reported in 1880: “For forcing we have nothing to surpass, if we have
anything to equal it, as it is early, handsome, very prolific, not liable to drop, and of
first-rate quality.” An anonymous writer in 1852 (see “Literature Cited”) described a
tree at Worthing, trained in the form of a wheel, its branches forming twelve spokes,
with the over-all height fourteen feet, and the circumference thirty feet. In 1883, J.
Clarke told of a single tree of Brown Turkey covering a wall space of twenty yards
“literally crowded with magnificent and well-formed fruit.” W. I. (1893) referred to fine
trees growing on the chalk cliffs of England, where the sea spray dashed over them.
More recently, E. A. Bunyard wrote: “This is the variety most commonly grown; more
are planted, I imagine, than of all the other varieties put together, owing to its hardiness
and productivity.”
According to Eisen, the Brown Turkey was brought to California from Boston by W.
B. West in 1853, and from England by John Rock in 1883. It has doubtless been
introduced many other times by various nurseries. Early reports of the California
Agricultural Experiment Station include Brown Turkey among the varieties being
tested at the substations. Apparently, it failed to compete successfully with other
varieties, and until recently no trees were to be found, even in collections. Introductions
have been made from England under P.I. Nos. 81,676, 93,275, and 95,598. At Riverside,
however, trees from these importations, as well as those obtained from the southern
United States, are so badly affected by the mosaic caused by Ficivir caricae Condit and
Horne, that normal fruit has seldom been produced. (See plate 13, showing effect of
mosaic on leaves.) On the other hand, trees growing in the southern and eastern states
are not at all or very little affected by mosaic. They are of a dwarf habit of growth, and
hardy, commonly bearing two crops. The Brown Turkey ranks with Celeste (Malta) as
the most popular dooryard fig from Texas east to Florida and north to Maryland. The
Everbearing fig of Texas, described by Close (1935), is very similar to, if not identical
with, Brown Turkey, although treated as a distinct variety by various nurseries.
Harrison, briefly described by Close (1933), and Delta, or New Delta, described by two
anonymous writers in 1943 and 1944 (see “Literature Cited”), are also very similar to
Brown Turkey.
Descriptions of fruit by Eisen and some other authors are not clear, as they are
probably confused with similar varieties. Confusion also exists in some descriptions, as
indicated by the two synonyms, Large Blue and Small Blue, with reference to size of
fruit. The following description is from specimens grown at Riverside and Fresno, and
as compiled from various English accounts.
Leaves small, mostly 3-lobed; upper surface dull; upper sinuses shallow and narrow;
base subcordate; margins crenate.
430 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Brebas few, medium, oblique-pyriform, with thick neck that is often curved; stalk up
to 1/2 inch long, sometimes swollen toward the body of the fruit; ribs prominent,
producing a somewhat corrugated surface; eye medium, open, scales violet-brown;
color mahogany brown, tinged with violet; meat white, with violet tinge; pulp
strawberry; flavor fairly rich; quality fair. (Plate 21, D.)
Second-crop figs medium or below, turbinate or oblate, mostly without neck; average
weight 28 grams; stalk up to 5/8 inch long, often thick and swollen at the apex; ribs
present, fairly prominent, more deeply colored than body; eye medium, open, with
violet-brown scales; white flecks large, conspicuous, scattered; color auburn to burnt
umber; pulp amber to light strawberry, practically seedless; flavor sweet, but not rich;
quality fair. (Plate 15,E.)
Caprified figs violet-brown, bloom prominent; average weight 36 grams pulp
strawberry; quality only fair. Second crop matures over a long season.
Rogers (1834) stated that if Lee’s Perpetual—bearing fig is “cultivated as it should
be—that is, in pots, under glass—it yields fruit nearly all the year round.”
Brugeotte. Described by Merlet (1667) as a large, violet fig with red pulp, produced
abundantly in autumn; this description was followed closely by Ballon (1692), Liger
(1702), Langley (1728), and Bradley (1757). In 1727, Bradley included Brugeotte in the
list of fig varieties he had introduced from Italy into England.
Caiana (syns. Bertolina, Ficus carica caiana Risso, F. carica browni Risso; the last
according to Sauvaigo). Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901).
Figs small, turbinate; skin thin, reddish violet, with distinct bloom; pulp pale red,
rather watery, and of bitter flavor. Grown at Nice and in Provence.
Calabresa. First crop only described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901). Brebas
large, about 3 inches long and 2-1/2 inches in diameter, pyriform; color bright green,
tinged with brown; meat violet; pulp red. Grown near Nice.
Calderona (syn. Paretjal Negra). Described and figured by Estelrich
(1910).
Tree of medium size; leaves mostly 3-lobed. Breba crop none. Second-crop figs
similar to and often confused with “Bordissot” and Martinenca; size medium; shape
oblate-spherical, with very short, thick neck; color black; pulp dark red. Used for
drying, but not extensively cultivated on Mallorca.
Caravanchina Negra (syns. Caravanquin Negra, Ficus carica obovata Risso).
Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901).
Tree with long, spreading branches; leaves medium, 3- to 5-lobed. Figs small,
oblong; skin thin, glossy, somewhat ribbed; color violet-black; eye surrounded by a
reddish iris; pulp dull red; flavor agreeable. According to Risso, it is necessary to
plunge the dried fruit into boiling water in order to preserve it.
Cascitello. Described by Guglielmi (1908) and De Rosa (1911) as Cascitello;
described by Vallese (1909) and Donno (1951a) as Nero. De Rosa states in a footnote
that he prefers the name Cascitello over Nero, as the latter is a general one, commonly
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 431
used for other varieties. De Rosa gives the following synonyms: Casciteddha, Cascella,
Cascetta, and Banegra. Vallese and Donno give additional synonyms: Colummo,
Colombo, San Pietro, Sampiero, Schiavone, Niuro, Canibianco, Mario, Mariu, and
Napulitano. Two of these, San Pietro and San Piero (Sampiero), are described
elsewhere in this monograph as distinct varieties. As pointed out by Donno, Cascitello
(synonym Colummo) should not be confused with Colummone or Colombo Pazzo
(Colombro).
Trees widely planted in Lecce Province, producing two crops; leaves generally 3-
lobed; terminal buds brick red, as described by Donno (1951a).
Breba crop generally abundant, although scarce in some years; fruits turbinate, broad
at apex; stalk short, often swollen; skin greenish violet, checking somewhat at maturity;
pulp rose-colored, very sweet; seeds few, hollow.
Second-crop figs of two sorts; the caprified, designated as Schiavoni, and the
uncaprified, designated as Canibianchi. Schiavoni medium, oblate, depressed at the
apex; stalk short; eye rather large, with scales violet; skin checking rather prominently
at maturity, readily peeled; color violet-black; pulp coral red; seeds fertile. Canibianchi
smaller, sometimes not even half the size of the Schiavoni, much lighter in color of skin
and pulp; flavor sweet; seeds few. Fruit of Cascitello is mostly consumed fresh,
especially the Canibianchi; the Schiavoni are preferred for drying.
Castagnolo. Described and figured by Baldini (1953) as an Italian variety, producing
one crop only.
Branches with brown terminal buds. Leaves mostly 5-lobed; lobes spatulate; sinuses
deep and wide open; base cordate; margins crenate.
Figs oblate, without neck; stalk short; eye closed; color violet-brown; bloom pruinose;
pulp red, sweet; seeds numerous. Production light. Crop matures middle of
September; of little importance.
Castanhal. Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932) as a variety very similar in
fruit characters to Sopa e Vinho. Breba crop none. Second-crop figs at Alenquer
medium, turbinate, green, tinged with violet; pulp carmine; quality good.
Catalan (syn. Ficus carica gallica, according to Sauvaigo). Described briefly by Risso
(1826), Pasquale (1876), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), Pellicano (1907), and Portale
(1910).
Figs oblate-spherical, violet-black in color; pulp red. Grown at Nice and along the
Riviera, but of minor importance; consumed mostly fresh.
Célestine (syns. Beaucaire, Figue Grisé, Grisette). Described by Langley (1728), Hogg
(1866), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Eisen (1888, 1901), Starnes and Monroe (1907,
with figure), Simonet et al. (1945), Evreinoff (1947), and Delbard (1947). (See account
under Cordelière of confusion regarding this and other variety names.) A French fig,
not reported in California collections.
Tree spreading, of moderate vigor, very productive; fresh fruit excellent.
Brebas large, pyriform, violet-gray; pulp rose, sweet; quality good.
Second-crop figs smaller, more elongated; color ashy gray; pulp red; flavor very
agreeable. Season early.
432 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Cernica. Described by Eisen (1888, 1901) as a black Dalmatian fig of medium size,
introduced into California by G. N. Milco; resembles Barnissotte. Colby (1894) gave an
analysis of the fruit grown at Fresno, and described it as a medium, spherical fig of
purple color, with blood-red pulp.
Chetoui. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Dra Tamar, Tunisia. Leaves large, 3-
lobed; petiole long. Fruit large; body spherical, elongated into a distinct neck; skin thin,
black; pulp rose-colored.
Cimeirenca. Sauvaigo (1889), followed by Eisen (1901), described this as a violet-
black fig, similar in other characters to Cimeirenca Blanca.
Claveu (syns. Clou, Ficus carica clavicularis Risso). Described by Risso (1826),
Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901). Name derived from the elongated form of the fruit
(“club-shaped”).
Tree produces two crops. Leaves 3- to 5-lobed; sinuses deep; blade prolonged to a
point on the long petiole.
Brebas large, elongated-pyriform; eye protruding; skin thin, uniformly dark brown to
black; pulp carmine. Second-crop figs smaller, turbinate.
Col de Dame Noir (syns. Col di Signora Nero, or Negra, Col de Señora Negra,
Cuello- de Dama Negra, probably Fico del Giammico of Guglielmi, Bouankirk.)
Described by Audibert Frères (1854), Hogg (1866), G. S. (1869), Eisen (1888, 1901),
Starnes and Monroe (1907), Guglielmi (1908), Estelrich (1910), Priego-y Jaramillo (1922),
Mauri (1939b), Simonet et al. (1945), Delbard (1947), and Montagnac (1952). Illustration
of fruit by Eisen; of tree, leaves, and fruit by Mann. In Spain, this black fig is not so
common or so highly regarded as Col de Dame, although the fruit is said by Estelrich to
be resistant to spoilage in wet weather. In France, it is a late variety of excellent quality;
Eisen reported it as extensively cultivated near Roussillon, and as superior to Col di
Signora Bianca. Simonet reported that the tree bears only one crop and questioned the
statement of Eisen regarding a first crop. According to Mann, the name Bouankirk
signifies “long neck.” The Kabyles also designate the variety by the names D’Abouch
Takli, “breast of a negress,” and Abgait. It is widely grown in North Africa, but on
account of thickness of skin it is not dried commercially.
Col de Señora Negra was introduced into California from England by John Rock in
1883; it was not included in the Chiswick collection. P.I. No. 6,467, listed as Baalie, has
proved to be the same variety at Riverside. The following description is taken from that
of Simonet.
Leaves large, 3- to 5-lobed; margins undulate. Figs medium; average weight 45
grams; body subglobular to oval; neck elongated-cylindrical, thick; ribs prominent,
elevated; stalk very short; eye small, with dark-red scales; skin fine, but fairly resistant,
checking crisscross at full maturity; color dark violet, greenish toward the stalk; meat
white; pulp deep red, luscious; quality excellent. Season late
Colombo Nero (syn. Colummaro Nero). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909);
description only by De Rosa (1911).
Tree bears two crops. Leaves small, asymmetrical, mostly 5-lobed.
Brebas elongated-pyriform, rounded at the apex; eye projecting, with rose-colored
scales; color violet.
Second-crop figs medium, ovoid, narrowed toward the base; stalk very short;
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 433
eye large, scales violet; skin yellowish green near the stalk, gradually becoming bluish
violet on body and apex, especially on side exposed to the Sun; pulp light red; seeds
few.
Constantine. Described by Colby (1894), Forrer (1894), and Eisen (1901, with
illustration) Introduced into California by John Rock in 1883, and in the Chiswick
collection of 1894 as P.I. No. 18,874; now found only in collections. Description is from
a tree fruiting at Riverside since 1930.
Tree fairly dense; terminal buds greenish brown. Leaves medium; glossy above,
mostly 3-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth and width; base cordate to truncate;
margins shallowly crenate.
Brebas none, or very few. Second-crop figs small to medium, up to 1-3/4 inches in
length and diameter, turbinate, with short, thick neck; average weight 26 grams; stalk
short and thick; ribs slightly elevated, coloring earlier than body; surface dull, with
prominent bloom; eye large, open, surrounded by a more or less distinct zone of
greenish color, scales violet; white flecks small, scattered; skin firm, violet-purple,
checking slightly at maturity; pulp strawberry; texture dry and mealy; seeds few.
Caprified specimens with dark-red pulp. Quality good, but fruits small and of
comparatively little value, either fresh or dried. (Plates 10; 15, F.)
Cótigo (syn. Cótio Tinto). Described and figured by Bobone (1932), who stated that
Mello Leotte (1901) regarded this variety as a mutation of Cótio, producing colored
rather than green figs. Second-crop figs green, with violet spots; stalk medium; pulp
carmine; texture coarse; quality good.
Coucourelle Brune. Described by Tournefort (1700), Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809),
Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette (1829), Duchartre (1857), Hogg (1866),
Couverchel (1839), Barron (1891), and Eisen (1888, 1901). The designation of this variety
by Eisen as Ficus carica fusca Risso, has not been found. Illustration in color by
Duhamel. The description by Tournefort seemed to Bernard to fit Coucourelle Brune
better than Angélique, as explained under that variety. According to Couverchel, trees
are common in Provence, where the fruits play an important role in supplying food for
the country people. The description is after that of Eisen.
Brebas very early; size 1-1/2 by 1-3/4 inches.
Second-crop figs below medium, spherical; stalk variable, short to moderately long;
color brown; bloom prominent; pulp dark red; flavor insipid; quality fair.
Coucourelle Gavotte (syns. Coucourelle Noire, Ficus carica labillardiera Risso).
Described by Risso (1826), Hogg (1866), Barron (1891), and Eisen (1888, 1901). Risso
described this variety as Labillardière, and referred to the previous accounts of
Tournefort, Bernard, and Duhamel; however, these last three accounts seem to belong
properly to Coucourelle Brune, and not to Coucourelle Gavotte. Eisen follows closely
the description of Hogg. The account by Barron is confusing, since the color of
Coucourelle Brune is given as dark purple, and that of Coucourelle Gavotte as dark
brown. This is just the opposite of the accounts by Risso and the others.
According to Eisen, the tree bears two crops, and his description probably refers to
figs of the second crop.
434 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Figs below medium, spherical, with dark, longitudinal lines; neck none; eye open;
color black on sunny side, pale bronze on shaded side; pulp blood red; flavor rich.
Cravé. Described by Simon-Louis Frères (1895) and by Eisen (1901) as a variety of
Italy and France. Figs medium to small, violet-black in color; pulp dark red; flavor
insipid. According to Barron (1891), Crave’ (Rivers) resembles Violette de Bordeaux.
Cumpini (syn. Del Capo). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909).
Leaves mostly 5-lobed. Figs medium, ovoid; stalk short; ribs slightly raised, deeply
colored; skin of a chestnut-rose color toward the stalk, but black on body; bloom light,
pruinose; pulp red.
Cuore (syns. Rubado, Roubauda Blanca, Arbauda, Corazón, Ficus carica richardia
Risso). Described by Gallesio (1817), Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889) Eisen (1901, with
illustration), Simonet et al. (1945), and Tamaro (1948) According to Gallesio, the name
Cuore was given to this variety because the fruit is somewhat heart-shaped. It was
designated richardia by Risso in honor of Professor Richard, of Paris. The variety is
much prized as a table fig in Italy, especially in Umbria, Sabina, and in the vicinity of
Rome the Genoese know it as Rubado. Gallesio stated that it was not found in Provence
or in Spain; but Eisen reported its culture in Provence, as well as in northern Italy.
Rubado has been reported under trial by both the California and the Texas Experiment
Stations; but its proper identity has not been established. According to Van Deman
(1890), cuttings of Rubado were distributed from Washington, D.C.
The tree reaches moderate size, with small, 3- to 5-lobed leaves; first crop very light,
or none.
Second-crop figs (according to Eisen) above medium to large, 2-3/4 inches long by 2
inches in diameter, oblong to turbinate, gradually tapering toward the short stalk; skin
thick, checking crisscross, adherent to the meat; color green, tinged brown in the sun,
and ashy gray in the shade; eye reddish, with gum exuding at maturity; pulp red,
sweet, rather sharp or caustic to the taste, and not so delicately flavored as Pissalutto or
Dottato. Skin is tough in texture when dried. Season late.
Curigo. Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932). Pata de Cavalo, collected at
Coimbra, is similar to Curigo; the two differ somewhat in intensity of color, external
and internal.
Figs pyriform to turbinate, with short, thick neck; stalk medium; skin green, with
many violet spots; pulp carmine to chestnut-rose; texture coarse; quality good.
Dame Noire. Described and figured by Simonet et al. (1945) from specimens grown
at Sollies-Pont.
One crop only; leaves medium. Figs small, subglobular, slightly narrowed toward
the stalk, which is up to 1-1/2 inches in length; average weight 20 grams; eye in a slight
depression, with rosy scales; skin pubescent, checking at maturity, uniformly reddish
violet in color; pulp light red; quality mediocre.
Datte Quotidienne. In his account of 1888, Eisen regarded Quotidienne as
synonymous with Datte; but in 1901, he classified these two as distinct varieties.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 435
One of the common names he gives for Datte Quotidienne is Constant Date; he reported
it as a very fine fig for drying, especially at Salon and Eyquières, France. The only other
account found is that by Audibert Frères in 1854; they describe it as a one-crop variety,
with elongated fruit, green skin color, and dark-red pulp. P.I. No. 18,860 of the
Chiswick collection, when fruited in California, produced pyriform figs, purplish black
in color. This leads to the conclusion that the material under P.I. No. 18,860 was not
true to the variety, and that the account by Eisen should be accepted as authentic,
although, unfortunately, he did not give the source of the specimens described.
Figs medium to large, pyriform, without neck, or with neck very short and thick; eye
closed, depressed, small; color green to violet-brown on ribs and exposed side; bloom
prominent around the stem end, but terminating abruptly at the equatorial line; pulp
rose-colored.
Dattero (syns. Donicale of Pistoia, Bezzoso of Lunigiana, Cortese of Liguria, Coasca
of Riviera di Ponente, Vezzoso at Piacentino—all according to Gallesio; Rolandine,
Rolandine Blanche, Briasca of Grasse, Blanchette, Ficus carica rolandina Risso, Ficus
polymorpha var. elegans Gasparrini). Described by Gallesio (1817), Gasparrini (1845),
Roda (1881), and Mingioli (1904), as Dattero. Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889,
1894), Eisen (1901), Trabut (1904), Bois (1928), Bun (1942), Simonet et al. (1945, with
illustration of fruit), and Evreinoff (1947), as Rolandine or Rolandina. Described by
Baldini (1953) as Donicale, with Verdiccio Gentile as a synonym. Illustration of leaf and
fruit by Baldini.
According to Eisen, Dattero is the same as Dottato. The accounts of Dattero by
Gallesio, and of Rolandine by Eisen, Risso, Sauvaigo, and Simonet, however, agree that
this is a one-crop variety, and that the skin color of the figs is green, tinged with rose.
On the other hand, Dottato trees bear two crops, and the figs are yellowish green in
color. Dattero is, therefore, treated here as a distinct variety, and Rolandine as identical
with it. Authorities also agree that it is an excellent fig, especially for drying, along the
Italian Riviera and in southern France. It seems not to have been tested in California, at
least under the names listed. P.I. No. 102,020, introduced from Morocco as Rolandine in
1933 and fruited at Riverside, proved to be identical with Archipel (Osborn’s Prolific) —
a different fig from the variety under consideration here. The following account is
based on those of Simonet et al. and Baldini.
Leaves mostly 5-lobed; base shallowly cordate.
Breba crop none. Second-crop figs medium, up to 2 inches long and 1-1/2 inches in
diameter; average weight 32 grams; shape obovate to pyriform; neck not prominent, or
entirely missing; stalk short; ribs not much in evidence; eye small, closed, scales pink;
skin checking at maturity; color yellowish green, tinged with violet; pulp light rose,
somewhat hollow; seeds small, few. Quality very good, especially for drying.
Djebali. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gafsa, Tunisia. Leaves large, 3-lobed;
petiole long and slender. Figs with prominent neck; eye wide open; color violet; pulp
light red.
436 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
erroneous. We can no more lay exclusive claim to this fig than can Mexico and Chile. It
was undoubtedly brought from Spain or Portugal at a very early date after the
conquest.”
About 1909, Eisen identified the “Mission” as Franciscana, of Spain, but the exact
reference to his publication has not been located. In 1925, Condit wrote, after personal
observations in Spain: “The Franciscana is a black fig commonly grown at Estepona,
over sixty miles below Málaga, on the coast. Dried figs of this variety seen at Motril
appeared to be identical to the California Mission.” It seems to be the same variety that
Escribano y Perez described in 1884 as Higuera Negra, of Murcia Province, where it was
much esteemed both for fresh fruit and for drying. The following two introductions
from Málaga into California have proved to be identical with the Franciscana: P.I. No.
58,664 as Negra, and P.I. No. 62,777 as Brebal.
Three varieties imported from England with the Chiswick collection, P.I. No. 18,875
as Biberaeo, No. 18,896 as Gouraud Noir, and No. 18,868 as Reculver, also produce fruit
like that of the Franciscana. The first two are described by Eisen as distinct varieties,
but the characters listed by him coincide almost exactly with those of the Franciscana.
According to E. A. Bunyard (1925), the name Reculver comes from Reculver, Kent,
England, where this fig was introduced by the Romans. Dean, in 1904, described
Reculver as a prolific fig tree with small, purple fruits.
Another introduction of the Chiswick collection, P.I. No. 18,867, labeled Douro Vebra,
bore fruit very similar to the Franciscana. According to Barron (1891), Douro Vebra is
the same as Biberaeo. In the original notebook of John Rock, Niles, dated 1895, there are
outline drawings and notes of California Black, Biberaeo, and Reculver. Under the
short description of Reculver there appears this line in the handwriting of Gustav Eisen:
“Leaves mottled, as on Mission.” This unpublished note, we might point out here, is
probably the first observation made on the occurrence of a leaf mosaic on the fig in
California.
Although it appears strange that Eisen should not have considered the above three
kinds to be the same as Franciscana, they are being treated here as identical with that
variety.
The Franciscana fig has long been grown in the eastern and southern United States.
Trees have been observed on the original Arlington estate of the Custis family near
Cape Charles, Virginia, and on a neighboring farm; also at the Virginia Truck
Experiment Station, Norfolk, and at the Hampton Institute. The probable reasons for
the lack in popularity of the variety in these districts are the susceptibility of trees to
frost damage, and their light productivity. W. S. Anderson reported in 1924 that in
south Mississippi, “the Black Mission was injured more than any other variety by the
cold, and produced very few fruits.” On the other hand, the fruit was of the highest
quality, “standing up better when left on the tree during the rainy season than any
other variety in the test.” Woodard (1940) showed that in Georgia, the Mission was
much inferior to Celeste in fruit production. Wythes (1902) reported Gouraud Noir, or
Dr. Hogg’s black fig, to be a fine flavored fruit, and excellent for pot culture in England.
Franciscana trees are widely distributed in California, both as individual trees
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 439
and in commercial plantings. Immense specimens are found, especially in the foothills
of the interior valleys (plate 5). The one figured by Condit in 1919 near Corning, with a
trunk circumference of 13-1/2 feet, has disappeared; but there are others just as large, or
larger. Another and older tree, still growing on the William Curtner place near Mission
San Jose, is reported to have been planted about 1800. Mills (1918) tells of other large
specimens. During seasons with unusually low temperatures, trees of this variety are
more subject to injury than are trees of other commercial kinds, as pointed out by Shinn
(1892) and Hodgson (1934). On account of the productive capacity of the trees,
resistance of the fruit to spoilage, and excellent quality both fresh and dried, the
Franciscana has long enjoyed an excellent reputation. The main objection to it
commercially is the black skin color, which practically prohibits use of the dried fruit in
fig paste.
The tree is a vigorous grower, with branches rather slender (plate 4), the larger often
drooping to the ground and taking root at the tip; terminal buds are violet-brown.
Leaves large, averaging 7-5/8 inches broad and 8 inches in length; lobes mostly 5, but
sometimes 3, or on vigorous wood with each basal lobe auricled; upper surface
somewhat glossy. Mosaic spots common and conspicuous on leaves and fruit, but
seldom sufficiently serious to cause alarm on the part of growers.
Breba crop good in most seasons; fruits large, up to 2 inches in diameter and 3 inches
in length, pyriform, with prominent, thick neck, often 1/2 inch long; average weight 56
grams; stalk short and thick; ribs fairly prominent, slightly raised, generally coloring
earlier than body; eye medium, scales purple; surface glossy, with pruinose bloom;
white flecks prominent, scattered; skin checking lengthwise at full maturity; color black;
meat thin, white, or slightly colored; pulp light strawberry, solid; flavor rich, decidedly
characteristic of the fig. Quality excellent. Widely used fresh for local and distant
markets, and frequently dried. (Plate 19, D.)
Second-crop figs variable in size and shape, larger and longer in cool coastal climates
than in the interior, as reported by Condit (1950); average weight near Los Angeles 41
grams, at Riverside 25 grams; size medium; shape pyriform, with thick neck, or often
without neck; body 1-1/2 to 1-3/4 inches in length; stalk short, thick; ribs narrow, only
slightly elevated; eye small to medium, fairly well closed, scales violet; surface dull,
with conspicuous bloom; flecks of white at first prominent, as shown by Condit (1941 a,
fig. 9, F), becoming obscured by body color; skin checking at complete maturity; color
black over entire surface; pulp amber to light strawberry; flavor distinctive, rich.
Quality excellent, both fresh and dried.
Caprified figs somewhat larger; average weight 56 grams; pulp dark strawberry;
seeds large, fertile. These figs are not regarded favorably, however, by dried-fig
packers because of greater loss by spoilage. (Plates 10; 11; 19, C.)
Frette (syns. Rouge de La Frette, Violette de La Frette). Described by Lhérault (1872),
Simon—Louis Frères (1895), Eisen (1888, 1901), and Delplace (1933), as a variety grown
at La Frette, near Paris.
Tree very productive; two crops. Figs large, pyriform, with reddish brown skin and
rose-colored pulp; season late.
440 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
masked by the bronze body color; pulp amber, tinged with strawberry; seeds practically
none; flavor rich and sweet; quality fair to good. Similar to Celeste (Malta), but of larger
size. (Plate 27,B.)
Caprified specimens much the same, except for dark-strawberry pulp and fertile
seeds; average weight 30 grams.
Imperial (syns. Imperiau; Ficus carica imperialis Risso; Brogiotto, according to
Gasparrini). Described by Porta (1592), Risso (1826), Gasparrini (1845), Sauvaigo (1889),
and Eisen (1901), as a rather large fig, commonly grown near Grasse, France. According
to Eisen, the tree bears two crops, the brebas being medium in size and poor in quality.
Second-crop figs medium, oblique—turbinate, with elongated neck; color greenish,
tinged with reddish violet; eye scales bright red; pulp pale red; quality only fair.
Invernengo Rosso. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as an Italian variety, grown
especially at Surbo, in Lecce Province. The figs are elongated-oval, reddish brown in
color of skin; pulp red, with numerous fertile seeds, a fact which suggests that this may
be a variety of the Smyrna type. Consumed exclusively as fresh fruit. Matures from
middle of September to December.
it: “The little white Ischia is very fickle in respect to quality; the fruits of today are
excellent, of three days hence watery and tasteless; the tree bears fruit as profusely as a
gooseberry bush.” Accounts of the variety in the southern United States are somewhat
uncertain, because of the possible confusion of the White and Green Ischia. Starnes
found Ischia White “decidedly the first choice” for Georgia, where the fruit shriveled
and dried naturally on the tree in good seasons. In 1948, a tree of this variety was found
growing at Grosse Coate, near Easton, Maryland.
According to Eisen, Ischia was introduced into California in 1853 by W. B. West, from
a nursery in Boston, and in 1883 the California Nursery Company, Niles, received it
from England. It was also brought in as P.I. No. 18,886 of the Chiswick collection.
Large trees are commonly found in the Sierra Nevada foothills, and before 1922 there
was a small orchard of at least eighty-four trees near McFarland in Kern County. One
of the largest trees of this variety is on the place of Mrs. Nettie Sullivan, Grabner P.O.,
Fresno County, near the upper end of Millerton Lake; it is reported to have been
planted by Wilburn Winchell in 1851. In Merced County an Ischia tree is growing in a
dooryard at Plainsburg.
Although trees were grown at the early California Experiment Stations, the variety
failed to receive favorable attention on account of the small size of the fruit. In good
weather the figs dry partly on the tree and drop with little spoilage; they are also good
for homemade preserves and pickles.
The tree has a dense habit of growth, with numerous small, short twigs; terminal
buds are olive green in color. Leaves small, glossy above, mostly 3-lobed; upper sinuses
shallow and narrow; base truncate, sometimes decurrent; margins crenate (plate 13).
Description of figs is from specimens grown at Riverside.
Breba crop small or none; fruits below medium, spherical, with very short neck; stalk
short and thick; eye rather large, open; color of skin green, tinged with violet; pulp light
strawberry; quality poor.
Figs of second crop borne profusely; size small, averaging 18 grams in weight, up to
1-1/2 inches in diameter by 1-1/4 inches from base to apex; shape oblate to spherical,
with or without short neck; stalk short and thick, or up to 1/2 inch long, sometimes
swollen toward the apex; ribs narrow, prominent; eye medium, open, scales pink;
surface dull, with faint bloom; white flecks scattered and inconspicuous, as shown by
Condit (1941a, fig. 9, H); skin checking crisscross, discolored or blemished by circular
brown spots at complete maturity; color green, flushed with violet; meat white, thin;
pulp very light strawberry; flavor sweet; quality fair. (Plates 9; 15, D.)
Caprified specimens slightly larger and heavier; pulp deep strawberry; flavor
somewhat acid.
Ischia Black (syns. Blue Ischia, Early Forcing, Nero). Described by Miller (1768),
Hanbury (1770), Forsyth (1803), Brookshaw (1812), Green (1824), George Lindley (1831),
Rogers (1834), Holley (1854), Dochnahl (1855), M’Intosh (1855), Hogg (1866), Thompson
(1859), Eisen (1885, 1888, 1901), Coleman (1887b), Wythes (1890a, 1893), Barron (1891),
Massey (1893), Burnette (1894), Starnes (1903), Starnes and Monroe (1907), Bunyard
444 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
and Thomas (1904), E. A. Bunyard (1925, 1934), Hume (1915), Gould (1919), Mowry and
Weber (1925), Cook (1925), Condit (1947), and Preston (1951). Illustrated in color by
Brookshaw (1812) and Condit (1941a); in black and white by Eisen (1901).
Ischia Black was apparently introduced into England from the island of Ischia by
Philip Miller, who described it as a black fig of high flavor, especially attractive to birds.
Later English authors add little to Miller’s brief description. Wythes did not grow many
trees, as he found the fruit to be of poorer quality than that of Ischia. E. A. Bunyard
(1934), however, added this note to his account: “A variety for the epicure when flavor
is valued.”
Ischia Black was obtained by the California Nursery Company from England in 1893,
and about the same time it arrived with the Chiswick collection as P.I. No. 18,894. Trees
have fruited in collections at Niles, Chico, Fresno, and Riverside, and at various state
experiment stations. Individual trees of this variety are also commonly found in
orchards of the Franciscana fig, and occasionally in dooryards. As Eisen commented in
1901, Ischia Black “is a common variety, but one which could easily be dispensed with.”
The fruits are smaller, but otherwise comparable, fresh and dried, to those of
Franciscana.
The tree is vigorous, upright in habit, with branches inclined to droop; terminal buds
are reddish brown. Leaves similar to those of Ischia, medium to small; upper surface
glossy, rugose; mostly 3-lobed, but often nonlobed; upper sinuses moderately deep and
broad; base subcordate to truncate; margins coarsely crenate (plate 13). Description of
fruit is from specimens maturing at Riverside and Fresno.
Breba crop fair; fruits medium or above, up to 2-1/4 inches long and 1-3/4 inches in
diameter, oblique-pyriform, with a short, thick neck; stalk often 1/2 inch long or more
somewhat swollen toward body of the fig; ribs narrow, slightly elevated; eye medium,
open, scales purple; color purplish black; bloom conspicuous; meat thin, white, with a
violet tinge; pulp strawberry; flavor fairly sweet and rich.
Second-crop figs small to medium, oblique-pyriform to turbinate, with or without a
short neck; average weight 30 grams; stalk up to 1/2 inch long; surface dull, bloom
fairly heavy; white flecks scattered, finally masked by black body color; pulp
strawberry; quality good.
Caprified specimens similar in external characters to the uncaprified ones; pulp dark
strawberry; seeds fertile, prominent. (Plate 27, C.)
Ischia Brown (syns. Brown Ischia, Chestnut-colored Ischia). Described by Miller
(1768), Hanbury (1770), Forsyth (1803), Green (1824), George Lindley (1831), Rogers
(1834), Holley (1854), Dochnahl (1855), Thompson (1859), Hogg (1866), Eisen (1888,
1901), Coleman (1887b), and Wright (1894). In his Gardener’s Dictionary of 1759, Miller
described Small Brown Ischia as a variety bearing small figs, with leaves less divided
than any of the other sorts. He also described the Brown or Chestnut-colored fig as “the
largest yet seen.” It is possible that the first description properly referred to the White
Ischia, the fruit of which has a violet flush when fully mature. Hogg and later English
authors treat only Brown Ischia, and ignore the prefix, “small.”
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 445
A variety, under the name Brown Ischia, was tested at the Tulare station, where the
fruit was found to be of excellent quality. A few growers later reported experience with
it, but in at least one case the variety was confused with Brunswick. If any trees are
now growing in California, their location is not known to us. The following description
is after that of Hogg and Eisen.
The tree an excellent producer, especially in pots for forcing.
Figs medium, turbinate-spherical; eye very large; color light brown or chestnut; pulp
violet, sweet and of good flavor.
Jasper (syn. A Bois Jaspé). The only descriptions found are those of Barron (1891),
Eisen (1888, 1901), and of Starnes and Monroe (1907). P.I. No. 18,848 of the Chiswick
collection, labeled A Bois Jaspé, produced fruit purplish brown in color. The variety
has probably been lost from California collections. Description is after that of Eisen.
Figs medium to large, pyriform; stalk short; color greenish yellow, tinged with
bronze; pulp pale rose in color; quality fair.
Jerusalem (syns. Figue Goutte, Gerusalem). Described by Audibert Frères (1854),
Duchartre (1857), Ounous (1863), Hogg (1866), G. S. (1869), La Brousse (1774), Soc.
Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Eisen (1888, 1901), Starnes and Monroe (1907, with
illustration), and Delbard (1947). Audibert Frères in 1854 reported, “les fruits avortent
presque tous.” This statement regarding the Jerusalem fig in France holds also for its
behavior at Riverside, California; for here, too, it drops its fruit badly. Hogg also
remarked that the tree is a very poor bearer. The main disagreement in the above
descriptions concerns fruit color, which Hogg and Eisen give as black, while Audibert
Frères and La Brousse term the color brown. On the other hand, Société’ Pomologique
de France and Delbard give the skin color as light or yellowish.
Jerusalem was introduced into California with the Chiswick collection as P.I. No.
18,862, and has fruited in various plots. In Georgia the tree was productive, with fruit
quality fair to good; color was described as “yellow, with dirty, brownish-black
blotches.” The following description is from fruits produced at Fresno and Riverside
since 1926.
Tree rather dense, spreading, with outer branches drooping; terminal buds green.
Leaves medium, glossy above, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth and
width; base subcordate to truncate; lower lobes often auricled; margins crenate.
Susceptible to mosaic injury. (Plate 13.)
Breba crop none. Main crop drops badly unless caprification is practiced; figs
medium, up to 1-7/8 inches in diameter and 1-1/2 inches in length, oblate spherical,
mostly without neck; average weight 39 grams; stalk short and thick; ribs fairly
prominent; eye medium to large, open, with violet scales; white flecks scattered, rather
conspicuous; surface dull, with light bloom; color green, shaded with brown or violet;
meat white, sometimes tinged with violet; pulp strawberry.
Caprified specimens darker-colored on outside and of a deeper strawberry inside
than when uncaprified; quality good to very good; skin color unattractive.
A variety of no particular value.
446 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Kahili. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gafsa, Tunisia. Leaves small, deeply 3-
lobed; petiolar sinus very prominent; petiole long and slender. Figs small, oblate-
spherical; eye wide open; color violet; pulp light red.
Kharroubi. Name signifies “carob,” as the figs have the color and sweetness of carob
pods. Described and illustrated by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as one of the sweetest
and best black figs of southern Palestine.
Trees are large and prolific. Figs medium, spherical; neck and stalk both short; eye
open, scales pink; skin thin, purplish black; pulp light strawberry; seeds many; season
late. Figs susceptible to rain damage.
Kus. Described and figured by Ozbek (1949) as only occasionally found in gardens at
Odemish, near Izmir, Turkey. Name signifies “bird.” Figs consumed fresh, ripening
over a long season in summer. Variety probably of the Common type.
Leaves mostly 3-lobed. Figs medium, pyriform, with prominent neck; stalk slender;
average weight 23 grams; eye protruding, partly open; white flecks large; color violet;
pulp light red, moderately sweet, somewhat aromatic.
Lardaro (syns. Lardaio, and probably Ladaro). Described and figured by Gasparrini
(1845) as Fico Lardaro, with the botanical name Ficus pachycarpa. Other descriptions
are by Porta (1592), Duchartre (1857), Pasquale (1876, with figure), Savastano (1885),
and Eisen (1888, 1901). According to Eisen, this is the most common fig near Naples,
where trees produce abundant crops. Savastano reported that caprification is practiced
for Lardaro. P.I. No. 86,809, received from Yalta, Crimea, as Lardaro, proved at
Riverside to be a medium-sized Smyrna-type fig of a green, unattractive color. It is
uncertain whether Lardaro is a Common-type or a Smyrna-type variety. The following
description is after that of Eisen.
Tree moderately vigorous, with spreading branches. Leaves large, 3-lobed.
Brebas none. Second-crop figs above medium to large, up to 3 inches long and 1-3/4
inches broad, pyriform, with long, tapering neck; stalk very short; ribs prominent,
raised, rough and irregular; eye flat, small but open; color green on body and neck, with
ribs dingy violet-brown; pulp pale rose, hollow, coarse; flavor agreeable.
Levenssana. Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica smithii, and by Sauvaigo
(1889) as Levenssana; description of Eisen (1901) is a literal translation of that of
Sauvaigo. Variety originated at Levens, near Nice.
Figs medium, oblate-spherical; skin hard, glossy, adhering to the pulp; color
pistachio green on lower half and brownish violet toward the apex; eye red; pulp bright
red.
Longue d’Août. Described and illustrated by Simonet et al. (1945, 1947) as a two-
crop variety, grown at Sollies-Pont.
Brebas above medium, up to 5 inches long and 1-3/4 inches in diameter, elongated-
pyriform, very oblique; neck long and curved; stalk of medium length; surface
corrugated by numerous, prominent ribs; eye slightly protruding, open, scales
brownish; color of skin golden yellow, with brown tinge on the sunny side; pulp light
red; flavor insipid.
Second-crop figs medium, 2-1/4 inches long, pyriform, somewhat ribbed; neck short,
or none; stalk up to 3/4 inch in length; eye closed; skin green, flushed with violet-
brown; pulp rose-colored; quality mediocre.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 447
McFadden. A seedling fig, described by Rixford (1918b) and Close (1929) as one of
the progeny of a cross, Agen by Meyer Capri No.2. First fruited on the place of A. J.
McFadden, Santa Ana. At Riverside, the tree has produced small figs, without neck,
violet to purplish black, with strawberry pulp.
Madeline. Variety received in 1923 from a grower at San Jose, California. Produced
medium-sized figs, dark violet in color, with strawberry pulp. The Madeline described
by Earle (1900) is probably Blanche (Madeleine). Identity of Madeline not determined.
(Plates 9, 11, 12.)
Madère (syns. Figue de Madère, Figue Noire). Described by Merlet (1667), Ballon
(1692), Liger (1702), and Langley (1728), as a large French fig, elongated, reddish brown
to black, with light-red pulp. Madère is probably identical with some other variety,
such as San Piero.
Malmaison (syn. Bifère de la Malmaison). Described by Audibert Frères (1854),
Hogg (1866), Barron (1891), and Eisen (1888, 1901). Hogg reported for Bifère de la
Malmaison: “Skin of a pale hazel-brown covered with a thin, grey bloom. Flesh...
agreeably flavoured but not rich.”
Eisen followed closely the account of Barron, which stated that the fruit is below
medium; skin pale brown, streaked with purple, with light bloom; pulp red, very rich.
Audibert Frères regarded the variety highly, especially for its production of a first
crop, and predicted a good future for it when transportation facilities improved. Their
description showed a fig of large size, brown to reddish black, with a light-rose pulp.
Malta (syns. Small Brown, Celeste, Celestial, Sugar, Blue Celeste, Celeste Violette).
Described as Malta by Miller (1768), Hanbury (1770), Forsyth (1803), Brookshaw (1812,
with color plate), Green (1824), George Lindley (1831), Holley (1854), M’Intosh (1855),
Dochnahl (1855), and by Bunyard and Thomas (1904). Described as Celeste by Affleck
(1850, 1852, 1854), White (1868), Massey (1893), Burnette (1894), Eisen (1885, 1897,
1901*),8 Earle (1900), Price and White (1902*), Starnes (1903*), Starnes and Monroe
(1907), Anon. (1908), Van Velzer (1909*), Reimer (1910*), Potts (1917), Gould (1919*),
Hume (1915*), W. S. Anderson (1924-1928), Mowry and Weber (1925), Woodroof and
Bailey (1931*), Stansel and Wyche (1932), Woodard (1938, 1940), Ashley (1940), and
Condit (1941a*, 1947*).
The identity of the Celeste fig, so widely grown in the southern United States, has
long been in doubt. White (1868) suggested that it might prove to be the Malta
described by previous authors. Others seem to have overlooked this suggestion, but a
close comparison of descriptions of Malta and Celeste leaves no doubt of their identity.
English writers reiterate the statement of Miller, that Malta shrivels on the tree and
becomes a fine sweetmeat. Stansel and Wyche report that in Texas, Celeste will dry on
the tree to some extent without souring. Bunyard and Thomas state that Malta “is in all
respects like Brown Turkey except in the shape of the fruits, which are shorter and of
peg-top shape.” Figue d’Automne or Celeste, listed by Ballon (1692), and Liger (1702),
_________________
8 Where asterisks appear in citations, illustrations of the tree or fruit of this variety are given by authors.
448 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
as bearing fruit which may remain on the tree during the winter and mature in the
spring, is apparently a different variety.
As early as 1850, Thomas Affleck reported that of the twenty-odd sorts of figs in his
orchard at Washington, Mississippi, the Celeste or Celestial was the general favorite.
Source of the first importation of Celeste and the significance of the name have not been
learned. In its catalogue of 1828, Bartram’s Botanic Garden, Philadelphia, offered
“Coelestial” fig trees at fifty cents each. For a century or more it has been the leading
variety in Louisiana and Mississippi; Earle (1897) reported that nine-tenths of all figs
grown in these two states were Celeste. In Georgia, Woodard showed that this variety
ranked with Brunswick and Brown Turkey in high production and resistance to winter
injury.
Although Malta is a common fig, trees do drop a considerable percentage of their
crop under some circumstances. W. S. Anderson found in Mississippi in 1924, that
many fruits set, but when not more than, one-half inch in diameter they usually
shriveled and fell off; the trees bore better crops in dooryards than under orchard
conditions, either with clean culture or in permanent sod. Canning companies at St.
Martinsville, Elizabeth, and Jeanerette, Louisiana, harvest Malta (Celeste) figs from
dooryard trees, and handle considerable quantities as preserves under various brands.
In the garden of the restored governor’s mansion at Williamsburg, Virginia, there is a
planting of fig trees consisting mostly of this variety.
Malta (Celeste) was introduced into California from eastern nurseries between 1860
and 1870, but on account of the small size of the fruit (has never attracted attention
commercially. Individual trees are occasionally found in yards, but most homeowners
prefer varieties which either produce two crops, or a single crop of larger fruit. Trees
are hardy, partly on account of prolonged spring dormancy. According to Stansel and
Wyche, they were not injured in Texas by a temperature of 11°F. in 1930.
In the southern United States it is generally considered to be a vigorous grower, but
in California trees are slow-growing and dwarf in habit as compared with trees of most
commercial varieties. Terminal buds are green. Leaves below medium, glossy, 3- to 5-
lobed; upper sinuses moderately deep and broad, lower sinuses shallow; base
subcordate; margins crenate.
Breba crop small, or mostly none; in Texas a few brebas occasionally mature in May,
the individual figs being larger than those of the main crop.
Second-crop figs at Riverside, California, small, up to 1-3/4 inches long and 1-1/4
inches in diameter, pyriform, with neck tapering gradually from body to stalk; average
weight 14 grams; stalk slender, up to 3/4 inch long; ribs broad, slightly elevated; eye
medium, partly open, but not readily admitting dried-fruit beetles; scales chaffy, erect
at maturity; surface dull, with conspicuous bloom often absent from a sharply defined
apical zone; white flecks scattered, fairly conspicuous, but becoming masked by mature
body color; skin checking crisscross at maturity; color violet-bronze to chocolate brown;
pulp strawberry; flavor sweet and rich; seeds small, hardly noticeable; quality good.
Figs drop and dry without spoiling. (Plates 9; 25, C.)
Caprified figs are larger, spherical-turbinate; pronounced violet tint outside and dark
strawberry inside flavor subacid; seeds numerous.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 449
lower sinuses shallow; base subcordate. Description is from figs produced at Riverside
since 1931.
Brebas very few, or none. Second-crop figs below medium to small, up to 1-1/2
inches in length and the same in diameter; shape turbinate-spherical to pyriform,
sometimes oblique; average weight 23 grams; neck distinct, generally somewhat
flattened; stalk short; ribs prominent, conspicuous on account of deeper coloration than
body; eye medium, open, surrounded by a zone of lighter color, scales tinged with
violet; surface dull, with fairly heavy bloom; white flecks scattered, of medium size and
prominence; color purplish black, with neck remaining green; pulp light strawberry,
solid; flavor rich and sweet. Quality good as a fresh fruit; external color poor when
dried. See Condit (1941a, fig. 2, G).
Caprified specimens, when mature, show checked skin and dark-strawberry pulp;
flavor subacid. (Plate 28, D.)
Martinique White. Described by Eisen (1901) as a small fig, pyriform, with short
neck and prominent, swollen cheeks; ribs distinct, few; eye open, large; color yellowish
green, with ribs flushed violet; pulp red, well flavored. “A most excellent fig for
canning.”
Maure. Described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica caffra. Figs nearly spherical; Skin
thick, glossy; color black; bloom pruinose; ribs narrow; pulp light red; seeds numerous.
Meirana (syn. Ficus carica meirana Risso, according to Sauvaigo). Description by
Eisen (1901), after that of Sauvaigo (1889), as a variety grown at Levens, France,
producing two crops. Brebas very large, brownish black; pulp red. Second-crop figs
black; pulp rose-colored.
Melagrano (syns. Franciscana, San France, Fico Unico, Fico di Spagna, Fico Robado,
Ficus carica franciscana Risso, F. polymorpha var. haematocarpa Gasparrini).
Described by Gallesio (1817), Risso (1826), Gasparrini (1845), Duchartre (1857), Pasquale
(1876), Roda (1881), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), Trabut (1904), Simonet et al. (1945),
and Tamaro (1948, as Granado). Gallesio reported that Melagrano was not being grown
in central Italy, but that trees were common near Genoa and in certain other localities.
In southern France it was known as “Fico di San Francesco.” The name Fico di Spagna
is due to the fact that a variety of Valencia, Spain, was apparently identical. Trabut
reported that Franciscana, or Figue d’Espagne, common in Oran, was sometimes
confused with Verdale.
According to Gallesio, the tree has spreading branches and 3-lobed leaves. Breba
crop none. Second-crop figs medium, 2 to 2-1/2 inches in diameter, turbinate; skin
checking crisscross at maturity; color greenish violet; pulp blood red, like that of a
pomegranate; good both fresh and dried. In wet weather, figs split wide open and
spoil.
Melinga (syn. Figue Melingue). Described by Merlet (1667); his account almost
exactly followed by Ballon (1692), Liger (1702), Langley (1728), and Bradley (1757).
Figs reported to be rather small, elongated; violet outside and red inside; quality
excellent. Fruits tend to drop when nearly mature.
Melouba. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gafsa, Tunisia. Leaves medium, 3-
lobed; sinuses deep; petiolar sinus none. Figs medium; eye open; color violet,
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 451
with ribs darker; pulp hollow, light rose in color; quality very good.
Mentonasca (syn. Mentone). Described by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as a
variety grown near Mentone and Nice, producing figs above medium in size, pyriform;
skin thin, dark violet in color pulp red.
Merengiana (syns. Marangiano, Melanciano, Melanzana, Parmigiano, Dottato Nero
or Rosso, Ficus carica melitensis Risso). Described by Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889),
Eisen (1901), Guglielmi (1908), Vallese (1909, with illustrations of leaves and fruit), and
De Rosa (1911). F. carica melitensis, or Figue de Malta, described by Risso, was
recorded by Sauvaigo as Merengiano. The name Melanciano implies “black,” while
Melanzana suggests resemblance of the color of this fig to that of an eggplant.
According to Vallese, this variety is known in some districts as Dottato Rosso.
Merengiana is grown to a limited extent only in southern Italy, while in France it is
found along the Riviera. A variety grown by Italian residents of Washington, D.C., and
called by them Eggplant or Melanzana, has fruited at Riverside, California, and proved
to be the same as Franciscana.
Leaves of the tree are generally 3-lobed. Description of fruit is after that of Vallese.
Breba crop borne only in favorable years; fruit large, obconical, with rounded apex;
color green, tinged with purple on exposed side; pulp pale rose, sweet.
Second-crop figs oblate-spherical (as shown in fig. 75 of Vallese); stalk short; color
violet; bloom pruinose; skin readily peeled from meat; pulp light red; flavor sweet,
pleasing. Consumed fresh; not much adapted to drying, as it is subject to spoilage in
some seasons.
Merioun (syns. Fico Fetifero, Fico dall’Osso, Ficus carica nucleata Risso). Described
by Gallesio (1817), Risso (1826), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), and Simonet et al. (1945).
This variety was described by Gallesio as Fico Fetifero, or “fetus-bearing fig,” because
the body of many of the fruits bore at the apex a crumpled and irregular second fruit,
with scales at the base. In Piedmont it was known as Fico dall’Osso, “bony fig,” on
account of the hardness of the secondary fig, analogous to nut fruits, commonly called
“fruit stones.” This monstrosity is similar to the fruit of Caprificus gigantea (Grande),
illustrated by Gasparrini in 1845, and to some of the teratological forms of figs
discussed by Penzig (1922). According to Eisen, Tapa Cartin (Grosse Jaune) develops a
similar monstrosity at the apex of the fruit. Gallesio reported that in spite of its
malformed fruit, Merioun vied with other varieties in Piedmont, and was found along
the slopes of the coastal Alps, especially at Saluzzo. Eisen, on the other hand, stated
that it is a curious but not a valuable fig, and is rare in Provence.
The tree bears two crops. Description of fruit follows that of Eisen.
Brebas up to 3 inches in diameter, bell-shaped, flattened at the apex, some fruits
contracted at the middle; upper part violet, lower part greenish yellow; pulp red, sweet,
agreeable, but dry and hard around the eye.
Second-crop figs smaller, but similar in most characters.
Merlinga. Described briefly by Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), and Simonet et al.
(1945), as grown near Nice. Figs generally borne in pairs, below medium, turbinate,
452 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
with long, slender neck; color dark brown to violet on the neck; pulp red.
Messina. Described by Portale (1910) as Fico Messinese. A violet-colored fig, with
short stalk; pulp red.
Mignonne (syn. Minion). Described by Merlet (1667), Ballon (1692), Liger (1702),
Langley (1728), Hanbury (1770), and George Lindley (1831). The account of Mignonne
by Merlet is more or less closely followed by the other authors. Figs small, violet-
brown; pulp red, highly flavored; quality excellent.
Minuto Nero. Described by Ferrari (1912) as similar to Minuto Bianco, but black in
Color. Figs small, turbinate; pulp red; quality good.
Monaie. Described by Société Pomologique de France (1887, 1947) and Eisen (1888,
1901). Tree is of large size, producing one crop in September. Figs above medium,
oblong-spherical; skin thick, bronze in color, prominently striped with violet; pulp red;
quality good.
Moscatel Preto (syn. Bêbera). Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932). Known as
Moscatel Preto at Coimbra, and Bêbera at Cacela and on the island of Madeira.
The tree produces two crops. Mello Leotte (1901), on the other hand, described
Bêbera as a variety which does not produce a first crop, and the second crop as
requiring caprification.
Brebas oblique-pyriform, sometimes much elongated; neck thick; stalk short; color
violet-black; pulp dark carmine, streaked with violet; flavor sweet and agreeable.
Second-crop figs pyriform, elongated specimens unusual in having the internal cavity
narrowed at the base rather than rounded; stalk short; color green toward the stalk,
violet on the body; surface smooth, puberulent; pulp carmine; texture fine; quality
good.
Mouissonne (syns. Mouissonne Noire, Bouissonne, Moissoa, Figue Violette, Ficus
carica movissona Risso). Described by Garidel (1715), La Brousse (1774), Bernard
(1787), Rozier (1805), Lamarck (1817), Duhamel (1755, 1809), Bory de Saint Vincent
(1824), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Audibert Frères (1854),
Duchartre (1857), Hogg (1866), Du Breuil (1876), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947),
Sauvaigo (1889; 1894), Eisen (1888, 1901), Colby (1894), Starnes and Monroe (1907),
Rolet (1916), Mazières (1920), Leclerc (1925), Bois (1928), Simonet et al. (1945, 1947),
Evreinoff (1947), and Delbard (1947). See Rolland (1914) for synonymy. Illustrated in
color by Duhamel; in black and white by Eisen, Starnes and Monroe, and by Simonet.
Mouissonne is a French variety, grown in the Department of the Var, especially at
Hyères, Nice, and Grasse. The only description by an author in England is that of
Hogg, and the account by Eisen appears to have been compiled. Colby gives a brief
description and an analysis of “Missonne,” from fruits grown at Fresno, California.
According to Eisen, Bouissonne was once introduced from France by Felix Gillet, of
Nevada City; no trees are now known to occur in California collections.
The following description is from that of Simonet et al. (1945). Leaves are of medium
size, deeply 3- to 5-lobed.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 453
Brebas few, medium, pyriform; neck short; average weight 50 grams; ribs not
prominent; stalk short; eye small, with violet scales; color violet, merging into green
toward the stalk; skin checking lengthwise at maturity; pulp red, of sweet flavor and
fine texture; seeds numerous, small; quality good.
Second crop abundant; figs medium, pyriform to turbinate; neck short, or none;
average weight 40 grams; ribs not much in evidence; stalk short; eye in a slight
depression, small, with violet scales; skin delicate, checking crisscross at maturity; color
dark violet; bloom prominent, pruinose; pulp dark red; seeds small. Quality good for
fresh-fruit shipments.
Mourenao (syns. Bagassa, Ficus carica mourenao Risso). Described by Bernard
(1787), Duhamel (1809), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Sauvaigo
(1889), and Eisen (1901). See Rolland (1914) for synonymy. Illustrated in color by
Duhamel. According to Risso, Mourenao is known as Bagassa in the vicinity of
Villefranche. Most descriptions follow closely that of Risso.
The figs are small, globular; skin thick, checking crisscross, violet-black in color; the
pulp is white, according to Bernard and Duhamel, red, according to Risso and Eisen;
quality mediocre.
Museau de Lièvre. Described and illustrated by Starnes and Monroe (1907) as a
French fig of medium size, oblique-turbinate, with prominent ribs, violet-brown skin,
and light-rose pulp; a shy producer. The application of the name, “rabbit’s nose,” is not
clear.
Nain. Briefly described by Merlet (1667) as a violet fig with red pulp; same account
given by Ballon (1692), Langley (1728), and Bradley (1757). Knoop (1771), however,
reported that Dodonaeus, Lobel, Dalechamp, and other ancient authors mentioned
Figuier Nain; but later writers were of the opinion that this dwarf fig was simply a tree,
poorly nourished, as if grown in a pot.
Napolitaine (syns. Napolitano, Neapolitan). Described by Audibert Frères (1854),
Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Eisen (1888,
1901), Trabut (1904), Mazières (1920), Sanchez (1922), and Blin (1942). This is probably
the same as Napolitano, described and figured by Pasquale (1876), and distributed in
France under the name Napolitaine. Eisen (1888) ventured the opinion that it was
identical with Troiano, so widely grown and highly regarded at Naples. Troiano,
however, produces no first crop, or only a scanty one, while Napolitaine is described as
productive of two crops in southern France.
The tree is said to be vigorous, and very productive. The following description is
after that of Société Pomologique de France.
Brebas large; elongated-oval; color green, suffused with violet-bronze; pulp red;
quality fair.
Second-crop figs medium, turbinate; skin color same as brebas; pulp red, sweet;
quality very good.
Negrette (syns. Negretta, Rock Fig, Ficus carica nigra Risso). Described by Risso
(1826, probably), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1888, 1901), and Simonet et al. (1945); the last
with an outline drawing of the fruit. Negrette is confused with Negronne. Risso
described a variety as F. carica nigra, or “black fig,” and referred to previous
454 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
descriptions by Garidel, Bernard, and Duhamel, all three of whom called it Negronne.
Sauvaigo, Eisen, and Simonet describe Negrette as the variety treated by Risso.
Negronne is regarded here as synonymous with Bordeaux. The name Rock Fig is listed
by Eisen on account of the ability of Negrette to thrive in rocky places. The following
description is after that of Simonet.
Leaves small to medium, entire, or 3-lobed.
Brebas few, small; average weight 25 grams; shape turbinate to pyriform; neck none,
or very short; stalk short; eye small, closed, somewhat depressed, scales violet; ribs well
marked; color dark violet, with pruinose bloom; pulp red; seeds numerous; quality
mediocre.
Second-crop figs much the same in fruit characters as the brebas. Sauvaigo and Eisen
give the pulp as “pale yellow.”
Nerolello. Described by Pasquale (1876) and Savastano (1885) as an Italian fig,
medium, with long stalk; color reddish violet; pulp red. Fruit sometimes proliferated.
Good for drying.
Noir Moutier. Briefly described by Eisen (1888, 1901) as a very rich table fig of the
Loire, France, introduced into California by Felix Gillet, of Nevada City. It was found at
the Pomona Experiment Station in 1897, that Noir Moutier was a large, brown fig, not
yet affected by fig souring. Eisen gave the color as yellow, with red stripes. A variety
labeled Noir Moutier was secured in 1927 from a grower near Pomona, who regarded it
as desirable for brebas but inferior for the second crop. Trees have fruited at Fresno and
Riverside. The following description is from specimens studied at Riverside since 1933.
Tree vigorous, with outer branches drooping; terminal buds green.
Breba crop fair; fruits below medium to small, turbinate to pyriform with short, thick
neck; stalk short; eye medium; ribs fairly prominent, narrow white flecks scattered,
inconspicuous; bloom delicate; color bronze, tinged with violet; meat thin, violet; pulp
strawberry; texture rather dry; flavor moderately rich; quality fair.
Second-crop figs drop badly when small, but some mature without caprification; size
medium; average weight 28 grams; shape spherical, without neck, or on vigorous wood
with neck prominent and flattened; eye large, open, scales tinged with violet; surface
somewhat glossy, with prominent bloom; white flecks large, scattered, conspicuous;
color greenish violet to mahogany; pulp strawberry; quality poor.
Caprified figs somewhat larger, greenish violet in color; pulp dark strawberry;
average weight 36 grams. Flavor rich and sweet, but figs are small, and of no particular
value. (Plate 17, E.)
Noral. Described by Escribano y Perez (1884) as a Spanish variety, producing two
crops.
Brebas large, of mediocre quality. Second-crop figs turbinate, 1-1/2 inches long; stalk
thick, short; color light green in the shade, tinged with reddish brown on the sunny
side; skin checking crisscross at maturity; pulp light red. Quality good fresh; very good
for drying.
Nourchi (syns. Matmata, El Hamma). Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gabès,
Tunisia. Leaves medium, variable in shape and lobing, some nonlobed. Figs pyriform;
stalk short; eye open; color greenish violet; pulp red; seeds few.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 455
Trees were rare along the Riviera, according to Gallesio, but some were grown in
Provence. Savastano noted that trees of Paradiso were grown primarily for production
of the first crop. In his account, Vallese reported that it was well distributed in Lecce
Province, but he did not give descriptive notes of the first crop.
The leaves are of medium size, generally 5-lobed.
Brebas (according to Gallesio) medium, elongated; skin green, with white flecks;
meat violet, like that of Dottato; pulp light rose, delicate; flavor exquisite.
Second-crop figs (according to Vallese) turbinate, slightly oblique; ribs present on
lower half of the body; stalk rather short; skin greenish yellow, shaded with violet on
the ribs, especially on the sunny side; pulp wine red, very sweet. Fruit produced over a
long season, from August and September to December and January. Marketed only
fresh.
Pardo. Described and illustrated by Bobone (1932) from specimens collected at
Loulé. Second-crop figs oblate-spherical; skin green, streaked with violet, smooth, dull;
pulp carmine, coarse, soft; flavor fairly agreeable; quality mediocre.
Partridge Eye. A variety labeled Partridge Eye was introduced in 1925 from
Granada, Spain, under P.I. No. 62,780. Trees, fruiting at Riverside since 1926, have
produced figs different from the varieties described as Œil de Perdrix and Ojo de
Perdiz. There is no breba crop, and the second crop is late in maturing.
The tree is vigorous, with spreading top; terminal buds are green.
Figs medium, obovate, with or without a short neck; average weight 36 grams; stalk
up to 1/2 inch long; eye small, but sufficiently open to admit dried-fruit beetles; surface
somewhat glossy, with delicate bloom; color greenish violet; pulp light strawberry;
texture dry, somewhat mushy; quality fair. At Los Angeles, most of the fruits shrivel
and drop without reaching perfect maturity.
Cap rifled figs larger, with dark-strawberry pulp; not improved by caprification. A
worthless fig in California. (Plate 28, A.)
Pastilière (syns. Pastidière, Pastellière, Hirta, Hirta du Japon, del Giappone, Japanese,
Ficus hirta). Pastilière is described by G. S. (1869), Colby (1894), Forrer (1894), Trabut
(1904), Eisen (1897, 1901), Condit (1921b, 1947), and Braunton (1936). Hirta is described
by Barron (1891), Eisen (1888, 1901), Shinn (1893, 1903,1915), Colby (1894), Forrer (1894),
Simon-Louis Frères (1895), Price and White (1902), Starnes (1903), Starnes and Monroe
(1907, with figure), and Blin (1942).
The origin and identity of the variety Pastilière are somewhat in doubt. Eisen (1888)
listed it as coming from Italy, but in his later publication he omitted any reference to its
origin. It is illustrated and described in Eisen’s bulletin of 1901, with the following
comment: “If the writer could plant only one blue variety, it would certainly be this fig.
The fine form of the tree, its abundant cropping, and the superior quality of the fruit
should make this fig a favorite all over the Pacific Coast.”
Pastilière was grown and tested at the California Experiment Stations from 1891 to
1903, with reports such as the following: At Jackson, the best black fig;
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 457
at Paso Robles, a very desirable variety; at Tulare, ranked first with Hirta du Japon so
far as bearing was concerned; at Pomona, Hirta du Japon was a heavy producer in 1892,
but in 1895 was utterly worthless, as the figs soured and rotted on the tree. In 1894,
Hansen reported Pastilière as the best black fig at the Foothill station. P.I. No. 18,888 of
the Chiswick collection was labeled Pastilière. According to notes taken at Chico in
September, 1921, fruits of this introduction were small, purplish black, and of no
particular value, either fresh or dried. A commercial planting of Pastilière, consisting of
about eighty trees, was maintained for several years at the Point Loma homestead, San
Diego. The crops of fresh figs during the five-year period, 1921 to 1925, varied from
3,909 to 8,580 pounds, obtained from the single crop ripening in August. Another small
planting was made at Vacaville, but there the variety was found to be inferior to
Mission (Franciscana).
According to Simon-Louis Frères (1895), Hirta is a Japanese variety, introduced into
France by M. de Siebold. Barron described it in 1891 as one of Rivers Brothers’
introductions. Trabut (1904) stated that it had been brought only recently into Algeria.
In California, it was described by Eisen in 1888 as “a fruit covered with a downy fuzz.”
In 1901, he described it as a purple fig, with “skin smooth, but not waxy; not downy,
even when magnified,” and added that there was reported to be another Hirta with
downy fruit, also from Japan. Colby (1894) gave analyses of the fruit from Tulare
County. Shinn (1903, 1915) stated that Hirta du Japon is a dark-purple fig, of high
quality for home gardens. Hirta du Japon, obtained in 1920 from J. C. Shinn, Niles, has
proved to be identical with Pastilière in variety tests. It was included in the Chiswick
collection from England as P.I. No. 18,857.
Various accounts report that the tree of Pastilière is of slow, compact growth, so that
it might be called a dwarf tree. G. S. (1869) stated that both tree and leaves were
ill-shaped, and that most of the fruit dropped off, imperfect. At Riverside, two trees of
Pastilière and one of Hirta, all planted in 1928, have been decidedly dwarf in habit of
growth. Furthermore, both trunk and branches show prominent nodal swellings
characteristic of this and of certain other varieties. (Plate 5.)
Terminal buds are plump, short, and green in color, tinged with brown. Leaves
below medium to small, mostly 3-lobed, but many nonlobed; upper sinuses shallow,
basal sinuses shallow and broad; base sometimes truncate; surface slightly glossy;
margins coarsely serrate. The following description is based mainly on fruit produced
by Pastilière trees obtained in 1920 from the California Nursery Company, Niles.
Brebas none, or rare. Second crop abundant. Figs medium, 1-1/2 to 2-1/2 inches in
length and about the same in diameter, turbinate or oblate; weight of individual fruits
from 27 to 55 grams; neck absent, or when present, short and thick; stalk purple, thick,
sometimes prominently enlarged toward the apex, up to 1 inch in length, loosely
attached to the twig, so that figs seldom dry on the tree, but drop when mature; ribs
narrow, slightly raised, conspicuous on the immature fruit because of earlier coloration
than body; eye large, open, scales purple, with scarious margins; surface dull, with very
conspicuous, pruinose bloom, thickly studded with prominent, harsh hairs
458 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
(hence the variety name Hirta); white flecks large, conspicuous at first, but finally
obscured by body coloration; skin fairly tender, checking crisscross at maturity; color
purplish black; meat white; pulp gelatinous in texture, light strawberry in color, hollow
at the center; flavor insipid, watery. Seed coats not at all developed, or only partially so;
pulp is therefore almost seedless. Quality at Riverside fair to poor. See Condit (1941a,
fig. 2, C). (Plates 10; 28, E.)
Caprified figs somewhat larger, with dark-strawberry pulp and large, fertile seeds.
A fig of no value for drying and of little value for fresh fruit, on account of variable
sizes, loose stalk, prominent spicules on the skin, and insipid flavor.
Peau Dure (syns. Dure Peau, Peldure, Peau d’Âne). Described by La Brousse (1774),
Audibert Frères (1854), Hogg (1866), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947), Barron (1891),
Eisen (1901), Starnes and Monroe (1907, with illustration), and B. A. Bunyard (1925).
The synonym Verte Brune is ascribed to this variety by some authors, but is treated in
this monograph as a distinct kind. According to La Brousse, the name Peau Dure
referred to the close adherence of the firm skin to the meat; he added that the fresh figs
sold in French markets at prices sometimes double those of other varieties.
The identity of Peau Dure in California collections is in doubt. P.I. No. 18,838 of the
Chiswick collection proved to be the same as Drap d’Or and Royal Vineyard, which
belong to the San Pedro class, as described elsewhere. The Peau Dure of French authors
apparently bears two crops. The latest account, that of Société’ Pomologique de France
(1947), is followed here. The tree is described as medium in size, vigorous, and very
productive.
Brebas medium, pyriform; skin glossy, firm; color brown, flushed with olive green;
pulp reddish, slightly acid in flavor; quality very good.
Second-crop figs smaller, rounded at the apex, the body abruptly narrowed into a
long neck; skin firm; color olive, tinged with violet in the sun. Resistant to rain damage;
excellent for drying.
Pecciolo Nero. Described and figured by Baldini (1953) from Firenze, Italy;
producing one crop only.
Tree with spreading branches; terminal buds light rose in color. Leaves mostly 5-
lobed; middle lobe spatulate, obtuse, basal lobes often fused with the middle ones; base
shallowly cordate; upper sinuses deep and open.
Figs pyriform, with short, slender neck; stalk slender, recurved; eye small, closed,
obscurely violet; skin checking at maturity, almost black; pulp solid (probably red).
Consumed fresh, and sometimes dried. More highly regarded than Pecciolo Bianco.
Peconjudo (syns. Pédonculée; Peconjude Grisé’; Peconjano; Pecouliano; Ficus carica
longicaudata Risso, according to Eisen). Described by Risso (1826), Duchartre (1857),
Du Breuil (1876), Eisen (1888, 1901), Sauvaigo (1889), and Simonet et al. (1945). This
variety is not represented in California collections, and apparently has not been grown
in England. The following description is adapted from that of Simonet, who gives
Fayence as the locality in France where it is grown.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 459
The tree produces no brebas. Leaves are small, and deeply 3-lobed.
Second-crop figs medium to small, up to 1-1/2 inches in diameter and 1-3/4 inches in
length; shape pyriform, with neck absent, or not prominent; average weight 25 grams;
stalk long; ribs not much in evidence; eye small, closed, scales rose-colored; skin firm;
color yellowish green, slightly tinged with blue or burnt umber; pulp red; quality good;
seeds small, numerous.
Pedral. Described and figured by Bobone (1932) as a Portuguese variety, bearing two
crops. Brebas turbinate to oblong, yellowish green, with violet spots. Second-crop figs
oblate-spherical; stalk short; pulp carmine, coarse; quality fair.
Penna (syn. Fico Rescio at Mesagne). Described and illustrated by Vallese (1909);
collected at Torre Penna on the Adriatic coast, north of Brindisi.
Leaves 3- to 5-lobed. Crops two, but brebas not available for description. Figs
globular, without neck; ribs slightly elevated; skin tender, with scattered white flecks,
checking at maturity; color green toward the stalk, violet on the body, especially on
exposed side and on ribs; pulp rose-colored; flavor sweet, subacid.
Pentolello. Described by Savastano (1885) as a variety grown at Sorrento, Italy,
producing abundant crops. Figs medium, turbinate; skin black, checking at maturity;
pulp rose-colored. Good for table use.
Perouas (syns. Velue, Peloua, Ficus carica pilosa Risso). Described by Bernard (1787),
Duhamel (1809), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel
(1839), Dochnahl (1855), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1901), and by Starnes and Monroe
(1907). Eisen listed the names Cortice Crasso; Setosa, and Velvet as synonyms, but did
not give their origin or meaning; he stated that the spelling, Perouas, was “probably an
error for Pelouas.” However, the earliest reference found to this variety, that of Bernard
(1787), gave it as Perouas, signifying “hairy,” on account of the prominent pubescence.
No record has been found of any introduction of Perouas into the United States, and the
description by Eisen is evidently taken from French authors. In fact, the account by
Duhamel (1809) is almost identical with that of Bernard.
The tree is reported to be productive, and not particular as to soil conditions. Leaves
are 5-lobed.
Figs are above medium, pyriform; skin tender, pubescent; color violet brown; pulp
pale rose. Consumed fresh.
Perroquine (syns. Perruquière, Violette Perruquine, Argusela, Douqueira, Douqueira
Negra, Peroquina, Monginenco ["in the vicinity of Grasse”], Ficus carica nicaeensis Risso).
Described by Bernard (1787), Duhamel (1809), Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel
(1839), Duchartre (1857), Hogg (1866), Sauvaigo (1889), Eisen (1888, 1901), Trabut (1904),
and Simonet et al. (1945). Illustrated by Duhamel in color; by Eisen and Simonet in
black and white. Douqueira Negra and Perroquine are treated as distinct varieties by
Eisen, but are regarded as synonymous by Simonet. According to Sauvaigo and Risso,
Douqueira originated near Nice (hence the name F. carica nicaeensis), where it was
regarded as one of the oldest and best-known figs of the district.
The tree produces two crops, of which the first is the most important.
460 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Leaves are of medium size, 3- to 5-lobed. Description is after that of Simonet, from
specimens grown at Villefranche-sur-Mer.
Brebas medium, 2-1/2 inches long by 1-1/2 inches in diameter; average weight 35
grams; shape elongated-pyriform; neck gradually tapering from body of fig to the stalk;
ribs present, extending from stalk to apex; eye in a slight depression, closed, with violet
scales; surface finely pubescent, with pruinose bloom; color reddish violet, with lighter
shade toward the stalk and on side not exposed to the sun; skin adhering to the violet
meat; pulp red, solid, not very Juicy; seeds small, rather numerous; quality fair to good.
Second-crop figs much smaller than brebas, pyriform; color uniformly violet-black,
pruinose; skin not checking at maturity; pulp red. Quality only fair fresh, but good
when dried.
Pissalutto Nero (syns. Pissalutto Negro, Pittalusse Noire, Sarnese Nero, Suffren,
Ficus carica suffrenia Risso). Described by Gallesio (1817), Risso (1826), Semmola
(1845), Eisen (1901), and Simonet at al. (1945). According to Gallesio, this variety is
grown near Genoa, but is inferior to Pissalutto Bianco. The following description is
from that of Simonet, taken from trees growing near Antibes, France, yielding one crop
only in late September.
Second-crop figs medium, pyriform, with prominent, slender neck; stalk long, readily
detached from the twig; eye small, open, scales pink; ribs slightly elevated; color dark
violet, shading to green toward the stalk; pulp red; seeds small, numerous; quality
good.
Poona. Described briefly and illustrated in color by Naik (1949), as the most prolific
variety on the plains of India. Figs medium, oblique-pyriform, light purple; pulp rosy,
sweet and well-flavored.
Poulette. Described by Audibert Frères (1854), Duchartre (1857), Hogg (1866), Du
Breuil (1876), Soc. Pomol. de France (1887,4947), Eisen (1888, 1901), Barron (1891), and
Wright (1894). Poulette is a French fig, reported by Du Breuil to be cultivated at
Tarascon and Salon, producing two crops. British authors describe second-crop figs as
handsome, and of excellent quality. It was introduced into California in the Chiswick
collection as P.I. No. 18,841; at Chico, both in tree and fruit, it was similar to No. 18,842;
Œil de Perdrix. In 1940, trees in the variety collection at Angleton, Texas, produced
bronze figs, with large, open eyes. Poulette has been fruiting at Riverside since 1931,
and the following account is based on its behavior there.
The tree is upright, and rather open in habit of growth; terminal buds are green in
color. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy above, mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses rather
deep and narrow, lower sinuses of medium depth; middle lobe broad, spatulate, often
auricled, especially on leaves of sucker wood; basal lobes sometimes auricled; base
subcordate; margins coarsely crenate.
Breba crop none. Second crop fair to good; figs variable in size, from small to above
medium, up to 2 inches in diameter and 1-3/4 inches in length; shape mostly oblate to
short-turbinate, with neck generally absent, or sometimes short and thick; stalk short, or
in some specimens 1/2 inch long; ribs present, but not prominent; eye medium to large,
open, scales violet; surface dull, with delicate bloom; white flecks large, scattered; color
bronze to greenish violet; meat white; pulp light strawberry; seeds small, only partially
sclerified; quality fair to poor. (Plates 9; 27, F.)
Caprified figs are larger; color purplish black, tinged with green; pulp dark
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 461
strawberry; quality fair to good. Mature fruits tend to split badly at the apex.
A variety of no importance in California, either fresh or dried, on account of small
size, poor color, and mediocre quality.
Praecox (Ficus carica praecox Risso). Under this name Risso (1826) described a variety
bearing two crops. Second-crop figs were small, spherical to oblong, black in color,
with red pulp; brebas were larger, long-stalked, with large eye. Some specimens
showed malformations.
Précoce de Barcelona. Described by Starnes and Monroe (1907, with figure), Reboul
(1908), and by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932). The origin and identity of this variety have
not been revealed. The Georgia material tested by Starnes and Monroe was obtained
from Nabonnand and Co., Alpes Maritimes, France. In 1928, rooted cuttings of Précoce
de Barcelona were introduced by the United States Department of Agriculture from the
same nursery, under P.I. No. 69,019. It has been fruiting at Riverside since 1931; notes
taken during the intervening years show the characters given below.
Tree fairly vigorous; terminal buds violet-brown. Leaves medium, somewhat glossy,
mostly 5-lobed; upper sinuses of medium depth and width, lower sinuses shallow;
basal lobes commonly auricled; basal sinus cordate, often narrow; margins coarsely
crenate.
Breba crop small to fair; figs medium, turbinate, with short, thick neck; stalk up to
1/4 inch long, swollen toward the body of fruit; eye large, open; color purplish black;
pulp light strawberry. Season early, figs commonly beginning to ripen two weeks
ahead of Franciscana.
Second-crop figs small, 1-1/2 inches in length and diameter; average weight 25
grams; shape spherical, with neck mostly absent; stalk up to 1/2 inch long, often
showing a peculiar split or crack, extending into the base of the fruit; surface glossy,
black, with conspicuous pruinose bloom; skin checking at maturity; pulp light
strawberry; flavor rich, distinct, much like that of Franciscana; quality fair to good. See
Condit (1941 a, fig. 2, A).
Caprified figs are much the same, except for the darker strawberry pulp and fertile
seeds. The statement of Starnes and Monroe; “but for its small size would be
promising,” may well be repeated here.
Pregussata (syn. Pergussata). Described by George Lindley (1831), Holley (1854),
M’Intosh (1855), Thompson (1859), Hogg (1866), White (1868), Eisen (1888; 1901, with
illustration), Watts (1890), Starnes (1903), and by Starnes and Monroe (1907). According
to Lindley, this most beautiful and excellent fig was sent to England from the Ionian
Islands, and was listed as No.57 in the catalogue of the Royal Horticultural Society.
Although described by Hogg as producing luscious figs, it was not included in the
Chiswick collection that was sent to the United States. Eisen, in 1888, used the spelling
Pregussata for the variety name, but in his bulletin of 1901 he gave it as Pergussata. All
other authors list it as Pregussata. The description by Hogg was copied by Eisen, who
stated that “this is probably the true Pergussata, received from England under that
name.” No later account of the variety in California has been found. Starnes reported
that Pregussata was worthless in Georgia, because trees never matured a crop in that
state.
Second-crop figs are described as medium, oblate, dark brown, tinged with purple;
pulp dark red; flavor sweet and rich.
462 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Rocarde. Described by La Brousse (1774), Shinn (1893), Forrer (1894 and Eisen (1901,
spelled Rocardi). This variety was grown at the California Experiment Stations from
1890 to 1903. Shinn reported as follows: “Two figs, as grown at the Stations, appear
much alike; they are the De Constantine and Rocarde. The skin is black and green
striped; the flesh is coarse, though rich; the seeds are large; and the type appears to be
like the old Mission fig. The green color forms a blotch at the calyx, and then runs
narrowing bands toward the stem. The trees appear to grow somewhat differently.”
At Tulare the tree bore excellent crops, but the quality of fruit was distinctly second-
rate. The following description is after that of Eisen.
Figs small, pyriform, with very short stalk; eye small, sunken; skin smooth, with
indistinct ribs; color violet-purple; bloom delicate; pulp light red, solid.
Rondeletta. Described briefly by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as globular fig,
with skin green, shaded brown; pulp red. Grown near Nice, France.
Rondella Negra. Described briefly by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as a fig
below medium in size, turbinate, with a long neck; eye reddish violet skin purplish
black; pulp red. Grown in the vicinity of Mentone, France.
Ronde Rouge. Described by Barron (1891) and Eisen (1901, after Barron) as a
medium fig, with dull, tawny-red skin and red pulp.
Rosa. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as a variety from Surbo, Italy, maturing one
crop in August. It is obviously different from the Smyrna-type fig described by Vallese.
Figs are large, oblate, violet in color; pulp red. Consumed fresh.
Rose Blanche (syn. La Rousse). Described by Garidel (1715), Bernard (1787), Rozier
(1805), Duhamel (1809), Couverchel (1839), Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), Colby
(1894), and Eisen (1888, 1901). In his account, Bernard quoted the original Latin
description by Garidel, and designated the variety as Rose Blanche rather than Figuo
Roso. Rozier also quoted Garidel, but used the common name La Rousse without
specifying its significance. Like Rose Noire, this variety is commonly grown in
southern France. In 1893, Colby received for analysis figs labeled Rose Blanche from
Fred Roeding, Fresno, California; they were of a dark-purple color, which leaves doubt
as to their identity.
Various accounts give second-crop figs as very large, spherical, flattened at the apex;
stalk long; color greenish brown; pulp red. Good for drying.
Rose Noire (syns. Cuou de Muelo, Rolandine Noire, Ficus carica rosa nigra Risso).
Described by Garidel (1715), La Brousse (1774), Bernard (1787), Lamarck (1817), Risso
(1826), Duhamel (1809), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Eisen (1901), and Simonet et
al. (1945). See Rolland (1914) for synonymy of Cuou de Muelo. Illustrated in color by
Duhamel; black and white by Eisen and by Simonet. The original description by
Garidel stated that growers knew this variety as Cuou de Muelo, a Provençal name,
apparently referring to the distinctive neck of the fruit. Bernard and all later writers
refer to it as Rose Noire. It is ranked as one of the better figs of Provence. The
following account is after that of Simonet.
464 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Leaves medium, deeply 5-lobed. Breba crop none. Second-crop figs pyriform,
medium in size, up to 2-1/4 inches long and 1-3/4 inches in diameter; average weight
40 grams; neck not especially prominent; stalk short; ribs not much in evidence; eye
slightly protruding, small, closed, scales violet; skin thin, checking lengthwise at
maturity; color bronze, tinged with violet; bloom pruinose; pulp amber to light rose;
seeds small, not numerous; quality very good.
Rose Peyronne. Described by Hogg (1866) and Eisen (1888, 1901). According to
Hogg, this variety “is distinct from Brunswick, with which it is made synonymous in
the Horticultural Society’s catalogue and in the first edition of this work.” (The Fruit
Manual.)
Figs medium, obovate; stalk up to 1/4 inch long; color pale brown; bloom delicate;
skin checks crisscross at maturity; pulp pale salmon in color; flavor rich and sweet.
Roussale. Briefly described by La Brousse (1774) as a spherical fig, red outside and
pale red inside.
Roussana. Described briefly by Sauvaigo (1889) and Eisen (1901) as cultivated near
Nice, France. Second-crop figs medium, reddish violet in color, with red pulp.
Roxo de Valinhos. Described briefly by Clemente et al. (1953) Reported to have been
obtained from Italy several years ago, and now it constitutes 98 per cent of the
production of fresh figs in the vicinity of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Similar to, and possibly
identical with, San Piero.
Second-crop figs large, pyriform; stalk short; eye large, open; color purplish black;
pulp rosy, with hollow center; quality good.
Royal (syns. Obispo, Trojano di Napoli, Tassa Brown, Geraci Black). In 1932, fig
scions labeled Obispo were received from Millard Sharpe, Vacaville, California, and
grafted into a Dottato tree. Fruit produced since 1933 has proved to be very similar to
that of Dauphine, but both crops of Obispo set and mature without caprification, while
the second crop of the former requires it. This same variety was imported from Italy in
1933 by Pasquale Caloia, Los Angeles, under the designation Trojano di Napoli. It has
been propagated and distributed by Armstrong Nurseries, Ontario, under the name
Trojano, as a black fig with amber pulp.
This variety has apparently also been introduced by various Italian residents of the
District of Columbia. Through the courtesy of H. R. Fulton, recently retired from the
United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, cuttings have been
received from six different sources in the District. In 1947, Fulton wrote as follows
about the tree on the property of Mr. Gerald Tassa, 631 Maryland Avenue, S.W.,
Washington: “The three varieties from Mr. Tassa were said by him to have been
brought from Italy in 1894 by his elder brother. We have on file here a color painting
made in 1910 of the ‘Tassa Brown,’ furnished by Amato Tassa from the original home
address in Washington. This bears the name ‘Royal Black,’ and it is the name that the
first members of the family applied to the variety.” The true identity of the variety has
not been learned, but at Mr. Fulton’s suggestion, it is here designated as Royal.
Breba crop fair; figs above medium, turbinate, with or without short, thick neck;
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 465
stalk often prominently swollen; surface glossy, with conspicuous white flecks; eye
above medium; upper half of body purplish black, lower half green, with violet ribs;
pulp strawberry, coarse.
Second-crop figs above medium, oblate-spherical to turbinate; neck mostly absent;
average weight 56 grams; ribs prominent, on account of earlier coloration than body;
eye above medium; color Dusky Slate Violet (Ridgway, 1912); pulp light strawberry to
almost amber; texture gelatinous; flavor sweet, fairly rich; quality fair. (Plate 26, B.)
Caprified figs with dark-strawberry pulp; otherwise, much the same as uncaprified
fruit.
Rubado Negro (syns. Roubauda Negra, Ficus carica serotina Risso). The description
by Risso (1826) did not list any common name for this variety. Sauvaigo (1889) gave the
name as Roubauda Negra, and Eisen (1901) as Rubado Negro. It may be the same one
which Porta (1583) referred to as serotina, a late fig with hard skin. No later accounts
can be found. The term serotina signifies “late”; the three authors agree that this variety
produces a crop late in the season—October and November—in southern France and
northern Italy.
Second-crop figs are above medium, 2-1/4 inches in diameter, turbinate; eye with
reddish-brown iris; skin firm or hard, dark brown to black in color; pulp red.
Saint-Esprit. Described by Garidel (1715), Rozier (1805), Duhamel (1809), Lamarck
(1817), Risso (1826, as Ficus carica spiritus-sancti), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839),
Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and Eisen (1888, 1901). This variety is reported as
commonly grown in the vicinity of Pont Saint-Esprit, France, hence the name.
The tree bears two crops of figs that are inferior in quality. Second-crop figs large,
pyriform; stalk long; skin checking, adherent to the meat, dark violet in color; pulp light
red; flavor insipid.
Saint Jean (syns. Grisé de Saint Jean, Saint Jean Gris, Grisé, Grisé Savantine Bifère,
Grisé Madeleine, Grosse Grisé Bifère, Ficus carica grisea Risso). Described by Liger
(1702), Knoop (1771), La Brousse (1774), Risso (1826), Barron (1891), Colby (1894), Eisen
(1888, 1901), Stubenrauch (1903), Starnes and Monroe (1907), and Condit (1947).
Figured in black and white by Eisen and Starnes; shown in color by Condit (1941a). See
comments (next page) on the name Grisé. According to La Brousse, Figue Grisé
matures the first crop in June at Saint-Jean, although he did not specify the exact
location of this French town. The fruits of Saint Jean, as grown in California, are of
medium size or above in the first crop, and small to below medium in the second crop.
The variety described under the same name by Eisen as having very large figs may be a
different one. Saint Jean is listed by Simonet et al. (1945) as a synonym of Cotignana,
which is described in this monograph under Observantine.
The following accessions to California plots of fig varieties have proved to be
identical in tree growth and fruit production: P.I. No. 18,865, Grisé Savantine Bifère, in
the Chiswick collection from England; No. 69,015, Grisé de Saint Jean, from a French
nursery in 1926; No. 86,806, Grisé Madeleine, from Yalta, Crimea, in 1931; also
No. 102,011, Saint Jean, and No. 102,014, Grosse Grisé Bifère, both from Marrakech
466 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Morocco, but reported to be originally in a collection of figs from Lérida. In 1895, notes
made by John Rock at Niles on Grosse Grisé and Grisé Savantine, showed that these
two were the same. The variety was grown and tested by the California Experiment
Stations, and found to be especially good at Pomona, because the figs did not sour
while on the tree. One distinctive characteristic of second-crop fruit, as mentioned by
Eisen, is the very sharp demarcation which separates the body surface, with its heavy
bloom, from the apex, which is devoid of bloom. This peculiarity is illustrated in plate
12, showing Figue Fleur. The variety is found in California only in collections, although
it is well worthy of culture in dooryards for its excellent fruit.
The tree of Saint Jean is only moderately vigorous, partly because of its extreme
susceptibility to leaf mosaic (plate 13); it produces two crops. The leaves are medium to
small, light green, 3- to 5-lobed; upper surface dull to somewhat glossy; upper sinuses
shallow, of medium width, lower sinuses shallow; base deeply subcordate, often
auricled; margins coarsely crenate. Description is from figs produced at Riverside since
1932, and at Fresno in the season of 1953.
Breba crop fair; fruits medium, up to 2-3/8 inches long and 2 inches in diameter,
oblique-turbinate to pyriform; average weight 42 grams; neck variable, sometimes
prominent and flattened to thick and short, or absent; stalk thick, up to 1/4 inch long;
ribs present, but inconspicuous; eye rather large, open, scales violet, erect at maturity;
white flecks small, masked by body color; color delicate grayish bronze; bloom fairly
prominent; skin checking irregularly at maturity; meat white; pulp light strawberry;
flavor rich and sweet; quality excellent; seeds medium, tender. (Plate 23, B.)
Second-crop figs smaller than brebas, but much the same in other characters; average
weight 31 grams; neck, if present, very short and thick; bloom conspicuous on body, but
absent from apex in many specimens; color a delicate violet-gray, attractive; pulp
strawberry; flavor excellent.
Caprified figs somewhat darker in skin color; pulp deeper strawberry; seeds
numerous, fertile. An excellent fig for fresh-fruit consumption, and usually dries
without much spoilage. Too small for commercial use. (Plates 9, 23, E.)
A variety with the common name Grisé was described by Risso (1826) as Ficus carica
grisea, but later authors apparently ignored the description, or at least failed to refer to
it. Eisen (1901) reported that the name Figue Grisé is a synonym for three different
varieties Beaucaire, Cotignana, and Matarassa. (For synonymy, see list at end of
description section.) The fruit of Grisé de Saint Jean as grown in California compares so
favorably with the description of Grisé by Risso that in this monograph these two are
regarded as synonymous, and are described under the name Saint Jean. Figue Grisé,
described by Merlet (1667), La Quintinie (1692), and a few other early authors, might
properly be referred to as Saint Jean rather than Angélique.
Saint Ursule d’Avignon. Described by Hogg (1866), and Eisen (1888, 1901, after
Hogg), as a fig below medium, oblong, without neck; color bronze; pulp pale red; flavor
rich.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 467
and Delbard. Illustrations in black and white by Gallesio, Semmola, Hogg (1869), Eisen
(1901), Starnes and Monroe, Vallese, Condit (1921b, 1933), E. A. Bunyard (1934),
Tamaro, and Baldini.
The history and identity of San Piero have been reviewed by Condit (1944); from this
account we glean the following notes. According to Gallesio, this variety has been
commonly grown in Italy, southern France, and in Spain. It appeared in England about
1866 under the name Negro Largo; Mr. Fleming at Cliveden received it from France,
and it was later distributed by the firm of Veitch and Sons, Chelsea. The identity of
Negro Largo with San Piero was confirmed by E. A. Bunyard (1934), who agreed with
Hogg that it was known in France as Noire de Languedoc. The description of San
Pietro or Mecklingea by Glady (1883) conforms more with San Piero than with San
Pietro. In Japan, San Piero is grown under the name Masui Dauphine. San Piero trees
have been found in the eastern United States at the following places: Saxis, Hampton
Institute, and Diamond Springs, Virginia; and Accomac and Crisfield, Maryland. At
Crisfield, San Piero is being grown commercially.
The date of first introduction of San Piero into California is not known with certainty.
John Rock of Niles received Negro Largo from England in 1883; he obtained “Aubique
Leroy” from France in 1889—the last part of the name was probably a misinterpretation
of Noire. San Piero cuttings were distributed by the United States Department of
Agriculture, according to Van Deman (1890), although no localities were listed as
recipients. The Chiswick collection from England included the following: P.I. No.
18,872, as Large Black Douro; No. 18,882, as Black Douro; No. 18,889, as Negro Largo;
and No. 18,905 as Warren’s Brown Turkey. All of these were probably identical with
San Piero. Cuttings received in 1924 from Málaga, Spain, as P.I. No. 58,665, labeled
Pacuecas, proved to be the same as San Piero. P.I. No. 93,277, introduced in 1931 from
England as Negro Largo, is different from San Piero, and its true identity has not been
established. In its catalogue for 1890-1891, the California Nursery Company, Niles,
listed Negro Largo as a new variety. The California Experiment Stations tested this
variety between 1891 and 1903 under the names Negro Largo and Black Genoa. For
reasons not now apparent, the name Negro Largo was dropped, and Black San Pedro
was substituted for it.
A variety known as Black Douro or Black Portugal has long been grown in California,
and it has proved to be identical with San Piero. The name indicates that it might have
been secured from their homeland by some Portuguese residents of the San Francisco
Bay region, as suggested by Eisen (1901, p.264). To add still further to the confusion,
this variety is designated by some as Brunswick! Commission merchants in Los
Angeles market the large, fresh figs of San Piero as Brunswick, although most growers
call them Brown Turkey or Black San Pedro. The Thompson, or Thompson Improved
Brown Turkey, is identical with San Piero. The same is true of Granata, grown by B. R.
Amend, Portland, Oregon. The following account is based on trees in production at
Riverside since 1930.
Trees are vigorous, precocious, very productive, often somewhat dwarfed by heavy
crops; terminal buds violet-brown. Leaves medium to large, some- what glossy above,
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 469
variable as to lobing; some are 3-lobed, with upper sinuses shallow, others 5-lobed, with
upper sinuses of medium depth, lower sinuses shallow; basal lobes commonly auricled
(especially on leaves of sucker growth), with the borders overlapping; margins coarsely
crenate.
Breba crop fair, stimulated by terminal-bud pruning of dormant twigs, as described
by Hodgson (1925); figs large, up to 3-3/4 inches long and 2-1/2 inches in diameter,
oblique-pyriform, sometimes elongated; average weight 105 grams; neck thick and
short, merging gradually into body; stalk thick and short; ribs prominent, generally
coloring earlier and deeper than body; eye large, open, scales tinted pink, even on
immature fruit; white flecks numerous, variable in size; color greenish purple, darker
on side exposed to sun and on the apex; bloom delicate, pruinose; meat violet; pulp
strawberry; flavor rich; quality good. (Plate 24, A.)
Second-crop figs medium to large, or commonly very large on sucker wood of
heavily pruned trees, obovate to oblique-pyriform; average weight 70 grams; neck
variable, thick and short, or sometimes up to 1/2 inch long and curved; ribs prominent;
eye large, open, scales purple; surface somewhat glossy, with prominent bloom; white
flecks large, scattered, some elongated, violet at maturity; color purplish black, with
lighter shades on neck; pulp strawberry, center hollow, as shown in plate 11 and by
Condit (1941a, fig. 11, A); flavor fairly rich. Quality fair to good when matured on the
tree. Consumed fresh; worthless for drying, on account of poor color and susceptibility
to spoilage, therefore seldom grown in the San Joaquin Valley. (Plates 10; 11; 12; 24, B.)
Caprified figs have darker color of skin, a deeper strawberry in the pulp, larger,
fertile seeds, and better flavor, than uncaprified ones.
Santagatese. Described by Ferrari (1912) as a variety of limited culture in Sicily,
producing large, turbinate figs, reddish purple in color, with light strawberry pulp.
São Luiz. Described and illustrated by Mello Leotte (1901) and Bobone (1932) from
specimens grown at Loulé’. Second-crop figs turbinate, with short, thick neck and short
stalk; skin thin, of fine texture; color violet-black; pulp light red; quality very good.
Saraïna (syns. Sarasina, Ficus carica saracenica Risso). Described by Risso (1826),
Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901), as a variety of southern France, much subject to
“couler,” or dropping of fruit of the first crop.
Second-crop figs medium or above, oblong-turbinate; skin thick, firm, checking,
adhering to the meat; color black; pulp red.
Sarreigne (syns. Petite Bourjassotte, Verdalo, Pichotte Barnissotte, Ficus carica
garideli Risso). Described by La Quintinie (1692), Cupani (1696), Tournefort (1719),
Garidel (1715), Bernard (1787), Rozier (1805), Duhamel (1809, with color illustration),
Risso (1826), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839), Sauvaigo (1889), and Eisen (1901).
Careful comparison of the various descriptions of Sarreigne and Barnissenca shows that
these two varieties are confused as to identity. Tournefort described Petite Bourjassotte,
and quoted the previous description of Cupani. Bernard quoted verbatim the Latin
descriptions of both of the above authors, and stated that the variety is called Verdalos
near Draguignan and Sarreignos at Cuers and Hyères. Duhamel listed the variety
470 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
as No.18, and also gave credit to former accounts. Number 62 of Risso, given as Ficus
carica garideli, is apparently the same variety as Sarreigne. Sauvaigo, and later both
Eisen and Simonet, appear to be in error in linking F. carica garideli with the variety
name Bernissenque, which is No.28 of Duhamel and F. carica bernardi of Risso. (See
account of Barnissenca.) The name Verdalo, according to Duhamel, was applied to the
variety because of the green color, which persists near the stalk.
Trees are reported to be common throughout Provence. Eisen recommended the
variety for the warm valleys of California, but no reports of plantings have been found.
The following description of fruit is compiled from various accounts.
Figs medium, about 2 inches in diameter, spherical to pyriform, abruptly narrowed
toward the short stalk, which adheres tenaciously to the twig; skin thick, not much
subject to checking; color dark violet, shading to green toward the stalk; pulp bright
red; quality good in hot climates.
Sbayi. Described and illustrated by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a Palestinian fig,
“distinguished by its purple ribs, running from stalk to eye.” Figs medium, oblate,
without neck; stalk short; eye open, scales pink; color greenish brown; pulp light red,
sweet. Good for fresh consumption.
Schiavo (syns. Prigisotto, Melagnano). Described by Pasquale (1876, with figure),
Pellicano (1907), and Ferrari (1912), as an Italian fig, grown at Cosenza, and
recommended for the coastal district on account of the excellent quality of the dried
product.
Leaves are coriaceous, deeply 5-lobed.
Brebas large; oblong; reddish violet.
Second-crop figs medium, black; pulp violet.
Selteni. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Gabès, Tunisia. Leaves medium,
3-lobed; upper sinuses deep. Figs with long, slender neck; eye wide open; color brown
to violet; pulp red.
Señora (syns. Forastera, Ivernenca, Orihuela, Ampurdan, Verguna). Described and
illustrated by Estelrich (1910) as a variety from the Balearic Islands, considered to be
one of the best-quality figs of Spain. It is marketed fresh in large quantities in Palma,
but does not carry well to distant markets on account of susceptibility to spoilage.
Second-crop figs are oblique-turbinate to spherical, with short, thick neck and short
stalk; skin checking crisscross at maturity; color greenish, tinged with violet; pulp deep
red; seeds very much in evidence; flavor delicate; quality excellent. Season generally
too late to permit proper drying of the crop.
Shunnari. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932), with illustration of a fig of each
crop. The tree is not prolific, and is therefore not commonly planted in Palestine.
Brebas above medium to large, pyriform, characterized by a bright-red ring around
the eye; color purplish black.
Second-crop figs medium, oblate-spherical, with short, thick neck; stalk short; body
color light green, with brown ribs; skin thin; pulp light red; seeds few. Quality good for
drying.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 471
Sukkari. Described by Grasovsky and Weitz (1932) as a special variety of the Acre
subdistrict of Palestine. Figs very small, subpyriform; eye closed, scales purple; color
brown, with purple ribs; pulp pale red.
Sultane (syn. Grosse de Juillet). Described by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876),
Mazières (1920), Bois (1928), and Simonet et al. (1945); the last with illustration of both
first- and second-crop figs. Simonet and Chopinet (1947) described and illustrated this
variety as Noire de Juillet. The following account is after that of Simonet et al. (1945)
from fruits produced at Sollies-Pont, in southern France.
Tree very productive.
Brebas medium to large, pyriform to turbinate, with short neck; average weight 85
grams; stalk up to 1/2 inch long; ribs prominent; eye small, closed, sometimes slightly
depressed, scales violet; skin firm, black on apex and body, shading to reddish brown
toward the stalk; meat violet; pulp red; quality fair. Season late July.
Second-crop figs medium, turbinate; average weight 57 grams; stalk 1/4 inch long;
skin unusually firm, resistant to injury during transport; color black, with prominent,
pruinose bloom; meat white; pulp dark red, of fine texture; quality good, Season
September.
Sultani (syns. Fayoumi, Ramadi, Barshoumi, Sidi Gaber, Hejazi). Described and
figured by Badie and Ghamrawi (1931) as the most common and widely distributed
variety of Egypt. The following all proved to be identical in the variety plot at
Riverside: P.I. No. 80,299, introduced into California in 1929 from Palestine as Sultane;
No. 81,678, from the Tarring Fig Garden, England, in 1929 as Madagascar; and
No. 80,152, from Ariana, Tunisia, in 1929 as Bidh-el-Atrous. The fruits show characters
very similar to those described for the Sultani of Egypt. Therefore, all of the above will
be treated here as one and the same variety. Bidh-el-Atrous is treated by Guillochon
(1913, 1927, 1929) as a small, violet fig, with green ribs. Madagascar is briefly described
by Spence (1846) as a small, globular, green sort, with narrowly lobed leaves, found in a
West Tarring orchard. J. L. (1890) stated that the name Madagascar, “evidently a
misnomer,” was attached to a very large fig, frequently met with at Lansing, England.
Trees in Egypt and in California are vigorous, producing two crops. Leaves large,
commonly nonlobed. The following description is from fruits produced at Riverside
since 1940, in comparison with the account by Badie and Ghamrawi.
Breba crop fair; figs above medium, pyriform; ribs prominent; eye large, scales pink;
color green, flushed with chocolate brown; pulp coarse, strawberry in color; quality
poor.
Second-crop figs above medium to large, pyriform; stalk variable, short and thick, or
sometimes slender and up to 1 inch long; color attractive, brownish violet; meat
unusually thin; pulp light strawberry, texture gelatinous; seeds small and
inconspicuous. Quality poor in Riverside, much inclined to split at maturity. Season
late.
Temri. Briefly described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a medium, elongated,
violet fig, fruiting over a long season, and good for drying in Tunisia. Reported by
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 473
Verdal (syns. Verdala, Grosse Verdale, Verdal Longue, Agen D’Agen, Grosse du
Draguignan, Ficus carica virescens Risso). Described by Risso (1826) under the
appellation “figue a’ fruit vert” (fig with green fruit). Sauvaigo (1889) described the
same variety as Verdale or Grosse Verdale. Hogg (1866) treated D’Agen and “Gros de
Draguignan” as distinct varieties. Eisen (1888) gave “Gros du Dragnignan,” with Agen
as a synonym; in 1901 he reversed the nomenclature, listing Grosse du Draguignan as
the synonym, with the last name correctly spelled. Other accounts are by Audibert
Frères (1854), Escribano y Perez (1884, probably), Barron (1891), Shinn (1893),
Stubenrauch (1903), Sanchez (1922), Condit (1921b, 1947), Blin (1942); Simonet et al.
(1945, as Verdale), and Soc. Pomol. de France (1947). The spelling Verdal is used here to
designate this variety, bearing green fruits tinged with violet, as distinct from Verte
(syn. Verdale), bearing fruits of an over-all green color.
Risso stated that the fruits commenced to ripen in late June, but later writers regard it
as a one-crop variety. Hogg reported it as “one of the finest figs I know.” Eisen also
described it as “one of the best figs,” ripening very late, and “requiring caprification at
Niles.” It was introduced into Algeria (Trabut, 1904), and according to Plant Immigrants
(No. 146, p. 1334), produced one crop of excellent figs from September to December. It
may be this variety which Estelrich (1910) described and figured under the name Verdal
de Oriola.
According to Eisen (1901, p.66), Agen was one of the varieties imported by John Rock
from England in 1883. P.I. No. 18,870 of the Chiswick collection was listed as D’Agen.
Notes taken on this introduction in September, 1921, at the United States Plant
Introduction Garden, Chico, California, showed a medium-sized, greenish-violet fig,
excellent in quality and well worthy of further trial. The same variety was grown by the
California Experiment Stations as Verdal Longue and distributed for trial, especially in
southern California. Dooryard trees have been found at Oroville, Monrovia, Riverside,
San Diego, and Carlsbad. About 1930, a grower at Carlsbad had a small commercial
planting from which excellent figs were marketed up to Christmas, or even later.
Cuttings were introduced into Georgia from California, but no record of production has
been found. Fruiting trees were seen in a variety collection at Angleton, Texas, in
August, 1940. The following account is of trees and fruit grown at Riverside since 1931,
and at Los Angeles during eight fruiting seasons.
Tree somewhat spreading, with outer branches drooping; terminal buds green.
Leaves medium, somewhat glossy above, mostly 5-lobed; both upper and lower sinuses
of medium depth and width; base subcordate to truncate; margins very slightly crenate.
Brebas rare, medium, turbinate; stalk up to 3/4 inch long, curved; eye medium; white
flecks large, conspicuous; color greenish violet; pulp strawberry; flavor rich.
Second-crop figs medium, up to 1-3/4 inches long and 1-7/8 inches in diameter,
turbinate to obovate; with short, thick neck; average weight 43 grams; stalk thick, up to
1/2 inch long; ribs narrow, slightly elevated; eye medium, open, scales chaffy, tinged
with violet; surface somewhat glossy, with prominent bloom; white flecks large,
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 475
conspicuous; skin checking crisscross at maturity; color green, tinged with violet or
light brown; meat thin, white; pulp strawberry; flavor rich; quality good. (Plate 26, C.)
Caprified figs medium to large, oblate-spherical; color attractive, greenish violet;
bloom especially prominent; pulp solid, dark strawberry, rich in flavor. Considerably
better in size, appearance, and quality than uncaprified fruit. Season late.
Verdal de Valence. Eisen (1901) quotes the description of this variety by Barron
(1891) and adds that the name is very doubtful. It is given as a fig below medium,
turbinate; color tawny red; pulp red; quality mediocre.
Verdal Round (syns. Verdal Ronde, Petite Verdale). Described and figured by Eisen
(1901). Simonet et al. (1945) had not seen this variety, but referred to Eisen’s description
and quoted briefly from it. According to Eisen, it is one of the earliest figs, ripening in
June and July; it is not clear whether his account is of the first or second crop. Figs
below medium, short pyriform, uniformly bluish green at apex, lighter toward the stalk;
pulp blood red, sweet, highly flavored.
Eisen stated that it was extensively distributed in southern France, and was highly
regarded in parts of California. The identity of this variety and the present location of
trees are not known.
Vernino (syns. Natalino Nero, Pasquale, Camaldolese, Della Cava, Tre Volte l’Anno,
Verneo Nero, Arneo Nero, Allison). Described by Gasparrini (1845), Savastano (1885),
Eisen (1888, 1901), Vallese (1909), De Rosa (1911), and Condit (1947). Leaves and fruit
figured by Vallese, who treated Arneo Nero and Verneo Nero as distinct kinds; De Rosa
described the two as synonymous. In his account of 1845, Gasparrini listed this variety
as Vernino, but added that some called it Natalino, or Christmas fig; others called it
Pasquale, since the fruits sometimes remained on the tree during the winter and
matured near Pasqua, or Easter. The name Tre Volte l’Anno refers to the tendency of
Vernino to produce fruit at various times of the year. Trees usually produce a second
crop only, late in the season.
Few trees of Vernino have been found in California. The late G. P. Rixford mailed
cuttings to the University of California in 1926 from a tree at Loomis, and reported the
location of another specimen on the Bidwell place at Chico. Another tree has recently
been found growing on the J.J. Mashio ranch in Hunter’s Valley, near Hornitos; this and
several other varieties were probably imported by Italian settlers long before 1900. P.I.
No. 130,464, obtained as Allison in 1931 from Angleton, Texas, as No. 8,379 of that
station, proved to be identical with Vernino. See accounts of Allison by Stansel and
Wyche (1932), and by Close (1933). A variety grown commercially near Bishop,
Georgia, known locally as “Breedlove,” has recently proved to be identical with
Vernino in the collection at Riverside, California. The following description is from a
single tree, fruiting at Riverside since 1933.
Leaves medium, 3- to 5-lobed; upper sinuses shallow and narrow, lower sinuses very
shallow, basal sinuses broad; base commonly truncate or subcordate; margins coarsely
serrate; surface dull. Terminal buds of branches tawny.
Breba crop none. Second-crop figs small to medium, up to 1-1/2 inches in length and
476 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
1-5/8 inches in diameter, oblate-spherical to pyriform, with short, thick neck; average
weight 28 grams; stalk short; ribs very slightly elevated, narrow; eye medium, slightly
protruding, commonly surrounded by a zone of color lighter than that of the body; eye
scales of green figs prominently pink, becoming violet at maturity; white flecks large
and conspicuous; surface glossy, with pruinose bloom; skin tough or rubbery in texture;
color purplish black on body, greenish toward the base; meat thin, white; pulp solid,
strawberry in color (darker when caprified); flavor fairly rich; quality only fair. Season
late. A small fig, of no particular value. (Plate 28, C.)
Verte Brune. Described by Garidel (1715), Bernard (1787), Rozier (1805), Duhamel
(1809), Lamarck (1817), Bory de Saint Vincent (1824), Noisette (1829), Couverchel (1839),
Hogg (1866), Eisen (1901), and Leclerc (1925). Verte Brune is another variety of
doubtful identity. Duhamel quoted the Latin description of Garidel, and referred also
to the accounts by Bernard, Rozier, and Lamarck. He stated, under both Verte and
Verte Brune, that in Provence these figs are sometimes designated as Trompe-Chasseur
or Trompe-Cassaire, literally, “hunter’s deception,” because of the persistent green color
of the maturing fruit. Hogg and Eisen treated Verte Brune as a synonym of Beau Dure.
The latter gives a second Verte Brune as synonymous to Cuers, and a third as a distinct
variety. In our description of Verte, it is pointed out that the green skin of that variety is
often stained by the pulp to a brownish cast. It may be, therefore, that Verte Brune is
the same as Verte, with the brownish or violet skin flush decidedly pronounced. The
following brief description is after that of Eisen.
Two crops; brebas not described. Second-crop figs medium to small, oblique-
spherical, “compressed at the stalk”; eye reddish; skin checking; color green, with a
violet flush in the sun; pulp blood red; quality good.
Victoria. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) from trees grown near Porreras
and Inca, Mallorca. Figs small, black; stalk reddish; pulp bright red.
Violet Sepor. Described by Wythes (1900b), Bunyard and Thomas (1904), Starnes
and Monroe (1907, with illustration of fruit), and Arnold (1926). “A valuable free-
bearing sort, suitable for pot culture and forcing,” according to George Bunyard. Figs
reddish brown, with light-red pulp; flavor delicate.
Violeta Negra (syns. Violeta Florentina, Africano). Described by Tamaro (1948) as a
variety introduced from Africa, but cultivated in all parts of Italy.
Tree vigorous; leaves medium-sized; one crop only. Figs medium, short pyriform,
with thick neck; ribs elevated; skin checking at maturity, violet in color; pulp red. Used
primarily fresh, but also dried.
Zaiti. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Hammamet, Tunisia. Leaves medium,
thin, 3-lobed, with deep upper sinuses. Figs spherical, with short, thick neck; eye open;
skin glossy, thick; color black; pulp red; seeds numerous.
Ziza Kheden. Briefly described by Eisen (1901) as an Algerian variety. Figs large,
oblong, with black skin color and red pulp.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 477
Adsi Ahma. A purple fig of Egypt, described by Badie and Ghamrawi (1931) as of
the same shape as Bayoudi.
Andreva. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910). Leaves, when expanded,
somewhat convex. Tree produces two crops, of which brebas are pyriform and black in
color. Fruit of both crops used for cattle feed and for drying.
Balafi (syn. Fuente de Balafi). Described and figured by Estelrich (1910). Tree
productive; leaves 3-lobed. Figs turbinate-spherical, slightly oblique at the base; stalk
short; skin thick, greenish, with cinnamon tinge; pulp of agreeable flavor.
Banyols. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910); see also short account by
Priego y Jaramillo (1922). Tree large, with drooping branches that suggest a torrent.
Leaves large, 3-lobed. Figs medium, oblique-turbinate; skin yellowish brown, checking
at maturity; quality good. Used both fresh and dried; cattle feed on them.
Blava. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910). Variety was named for the bluish-
green color of the fruit, which is of medium size, agreeable flavor, and is used both for
drying and for cattle feed. It matures early.
Capoll Llarch. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910). Figs medium, oblique-
pyriform, with short, thick neck; average weight 33 grams; skin checking at maturity;
color green at the base, greenish violet on the body; pulp not highly flavored. Season
early. Used mostly for cattle feed.
Colombo Selvatico. Described by De Rosa (1911). Trees with small, 3-lobed leaves.
Brebas with body spherical, but narrowing toward base, apex sometimes depressed;
color green, tinted with violet. Second-crop figs pyriform, 2-1/4 by 1-3/4 inches; stalk
short; skin violet; flavor strong, not especially agreeable.
Dominique (syn. Saint Dominique). Listed by Eisen (1888, 1901) as a violet-colored
French fig.
Foundling. According to Howard (1945), Foundling was so named by Luther
Burbank, who found it in 1885 in a shipment of White Smyrna (Blanche) trees imported
from the eastern Mediterranean. The single tree bore two crops of large, yellowish-
brown figs, of fine flavor.
Franche. Described by Audibert Frères (1854) as a variety highly regarded by French
growers for its brebas, which mature about the first of August, when there are few if
any other figs in the market. The only fruit characters given are “size good; color tawny
or dark gray.”
Gallipolino. Described by Guglielmi (1908) as a variety grown near Presicce, Lecce
Province, for its fresh fruit. Figs medium, oval; stalk short; skin thin, violet in color.
Gazir. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a medium-sized fig, violet in
color. On the other hand, Minangoin (1931) described Gazir as a yellow fig with rose-
colored pulp when caprified.
478 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Gombaya. Described by Eisen (1901) as a medium fig, spherical, bright rose in color.
Grown and much esteemed near Valencia, Spain.
Grá. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as De Grá, a variety commonly grown
at Alcudia, Mallorca, for cattle feed. The figs are of medium size, conical, mulberry in
color, with green spots.
Grosse Sultane. Described by Soc. Pomol. de France (1887, 1947); apparently
different from the Sultane described by Simonet et al. (1945). One crop only. Figs large,
turbinate, olive green to violet in color; prominently striated; quality good.
Hamri. Described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a Tunisian variety, large to
very large in size, violet in color; matures in August; used both fresh and dried.
Hameri, described by Minangoin (1931) as a fig from El Oudiane that is yellow, with
violet ribs and red pulp, may be the same variety.
Mahounaise. Described by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and Eisen (1888,
1901), as a red fig, grown at Salon and Saint-Rémy, France.
Mare de Déu. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a variety resembling
Albacor, and often confused with Martinenca and Calderona. Second-crop figs oblate,
without neck; stalk short; color black. Season mid September to late October in
Mallorca.
Miraya. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a variety similar to Parejal, but
distinct in fruit characters. Figs large, 2-1/4 inches long by 1-1/2 inches in diameter,
turbinate, with short, thick neck; stalk short; color purplish black. Consumed fresh; also
very good for drying.
Monica. Described by Guglielmi (1908). Cultivated in the district of San Vito
d’Otranto. Leaves 3-lobed, with cordate base. Figs elongated-oval, medium in size;
skin checked, violet in color. Consumed fresh. Matures in September.
Piemontese. Described by Gasparrini (1845) as an Italian variety, bearing two light
crops of black figs. Brebas elongated, large; flavor fair. Second-crop figs medium,
mediocre in quality.
Plata. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910). Fruit is short-stalked, spherical;
skin prominently checked at maturity; color tawny or cinnamon.
Porquena (syn. Porquena Negra). Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a
variety grown almost exclusively on the island of Mallorca for cattle feed.
The figs are below medium to small, spherical, black in color.
Porto (syn. De Porto). Described by Du Breuil (1876) and Eisen (1888, 1901) as a black
fig, grown in southern France for fresh fruit and for drying.
Quasbi. Described by Minangoin (1931) from Ras-el-Djebel, Tunisia. Leaves large, 5-
lobed; upper sinuses deep, nearly closed, lower sinuses open. Figs large, oblong; ribs
indistinct; eye wide open; skin color dark violet; pulp solid.
Quasse Blanche. Described by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and Eisen (1901),
as a reddish-gray fig, grown at Baudol, in southern France, for drying.
Redona de Grá. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a late maturing fig,
used fresh for fattening hogs on the island of Mallorca. Figs small, spherical, black in
color.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 479
Renyach. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a large, black fig, used for hog
feed and for drying; not widely planted.
Roca. Described and illustrated by Estelrich (1910) as a small, spherical fig, ruddy
blue in color, maturing from September to mid-October. Consumed fresh by farmers;
also fed to hogs.
Rojisca (syn. Cuiro de Bou). Described and figured by Estelrich (1919) as a prolific
variety, producing small, spherical figs, reddish brown in color; skin checking crisscross
at maturity.
Safranée. Described by Du Breuil (1876) and Eisen (1888, 1901) as a reddish-gray fig,
good fresh or dried. Grown at Nice and Salon, France.
Sidi-ben-Aied. Listed by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a medium-sized Tunisian
fig, dark violet in color.
Sitsel (syn. Peluda). Described by Estelrich (1910) as a variety found at various
places on the island of Mallorca; some trees are a century old, and of large size. Figs
small, conical, light brown in color; flavor poor. Not consumed fresh, but dried for
cattle feed.
Tebessi. Briefly described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a very large, dark-
violet fig, good for drying in Tunisia. Minangoin (1931), on the other hand, described
Tebessi as a fig with long neck, thick, green skin, wide open eye, and hollow, light-red
pulp.
Tia Penya. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a variety sometimes
confused with Cuello de Dama Blanca (Col de Dame) on Mallorca.
Brebas not described. Second-crop figs pyriform, medium, up to 2 inches long and
1-1/2 inches in diameter; skin thick; color green, shaded with brown. Consumed fresh;
also used as cattle feed.
Tounsi. Briefly described by Guillochon (1913, 1927, 1929) as a small, copper-colored
fig, streaked with violet; matures in late August in Tunisia.
Verdal Negra. Described and figured by Estelrich (1910) as a small, black fig; planted
rarely in Mallorcan orchards.
Vernile. Described by Ferrari (1912) as an Italian fig, depressed at the apex; color
yellowish, tinted with violet; season late.
Violette Plate. Described by Merlet (1667), Ballon (1692), Liger (1702), and Langley
(1728). Tree produces a light breba crop and a good second crop. Figs medium, violet,
of excellent quality.
Zarniza. Introduced into the United States in 1901 as P.I. No. 5,920, from Lesina
(Hvar) Island, Dalmatia. In Inventory No.10, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States
Department of Agriculture, D. G. Fairchild reported it as a variety producing two crops
of dark-colored figs, sometimes dried and packed in small barrels for export. No
further mention of it has been found.
Bifero (?). Pasquale (1876) described Bifero under Ficus polymorpha var. bifera of
Gasparrini (1845), with Sampiero (San Piero), as a synonym. Pellicano (1907) cited the
account of Pasquale, but stated that Bifero figs were light green in color, and required
caprification. Portale (1910) described “Bifaro” as a variety producing two crops of
spherical figs without caprification.
480 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
Boutiltete. Listed by Du Breuil (1876) and Eisen (1901) as a very good drying fig,
grown at Brignoles, France.
Doucette. Listed by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and Eisen (1888, 1901), as a
good fig, fresh and dried, at Salon, France.
Fabre. Listed only by Eisen (1901) as a large French fig, producing two crops.
Koutsina. Listed by Symeonides (1930) as a variety grown “all over Tylliria district”
of Cyprus.
Malaktiana. Listed by Symeonides (1930) as a variety especially popular near
Lefkara, Cyprus.
Messongue (syn. Moelle). Listed by Duchartre (1857), Du Breuil (1876), and Eisen
(1901, apparently quoted from Du Breuil), as a very large fig, grown at Salerno, Italy.
Good both fresh and dried.
Papathoumika. Described by Symeonides (1930) as one of the best varieties of
Cyprus for production of dried figs, having a very thin skin and small seeds.
Porcine. Listed by Tanara (1651) as producing two crops; good for the fresh-fruit
market.
Seirola Negra. Sauvaigo (1889) noted that he had found this variety in the vicinity of
Nice. As a synonym, he gave Ficus carica turneria Risso.
Vardina (syn. Vardica). Listed by Symeonides (1930) as producing some of the
largest figs of Cyprus, and most popular for fresh consumption.
Vazanata. Listed by Symeonides (1930) as a variety grown everywhere on the island
of Cyprus. Mostly consumed fresh, but in the Paphos district it produces the dried figs
known locally as “maxiles.”
INDEXED ALPHABETICAL LIST OF FIG VARIETIES
Names in boldface type are those under which the varieties are described.
All synonyms appear in lightface.
Symbols: C Common; Cp = Caprifig; S = Smyrna; Sp = San Pedro
ANONYMOUS
1828. The Brunswick fig. Pom. Mag. of London 1:48. Color plate.
1852. Brown Turkey fig. Gard. Chron. 12:325, 357.
1878. Fig Col di Signora Bianca. Florist and Pomologist 11:121. Color plate p.473.
1882. Osborn Prolific. Rev. Hort. 54:110, 202. (Introduced into France.)
1908. The Celeste fig. Amer. Fruit and Nut Jour. 5(87) :8. (Probably by H. H. Hume.)
1943. New variety of fig, the Delta. Texas Farming and Citriculture 19(7):17. January.
1944. Fig for Florida shows promise. Florida Grower 52 (12):10. December. 1 figure of New Delta fig.
1949. Promising new fig. Fruit World [Melbourne] 50 (6):16; 50 (7) :7. See also:
Hort. Abs. 19 (2731). (Preston Prolific.)
A., R.
1937. Fig White Ischia. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 102:437.
AFFLECK, THOMAS
1850. Fruits and fruit culture. Farmer and Planter [Pendleton, S.C.] 1:182.
1851. Southern rural almanac and plantation and garden calendar [Washington, Mississippi].
(Fig, p. 67.)
1852. Same. (Fig, pp. 83, 99-100.)
1854. The New Orleans almanac for the year 1854; with Affleck’s plantation and garden calendar
[New Orleans] 1(2). (Figs, p.64.)
ALDROVANDI, ULISSE
1668. Dendrologiae naturalis: scilicet arborum historiae. 2 vols. 660 pp. Typ. Ferroni, Bologna. (De
ficu, pp.427-80.)
ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, P. TH.
1937. New fruits. Hort. Research [Athens] 4: 376-79. 2 figures. (In Greek, with English summary.)
ANDERSON, JAMES
1874. The new practical gardener and modern horticulturist. 988 pp. Wm. Mackenzie, London. Color
plate of Brunswick. Variety descriptions by A. F. Barron. (Figs, pp. 304, 342-44, 506.)
ANDERSON, W. S.
1924-1928. Horticultural work. Miss. Agr. Expt. Sta. Buls. 225, 232, 246.
ARNOLD, RALPH E.
1926. Select varieties of figs. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 80:335.
ASHLEY, T. E.
1940. Home orchards in Mississippi. Miss. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 350:1-37. (Fig, pp. 8, 33.)
1943. Miss. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 393:33.
AUDIBERT FRÈRES
1854. Quelques variétés de figues les plus estimées. Rev. Hort. (ser. 4) 3:229-35.
B., S. H.
1896. White Ischia. The Garden 49:312. April 25.
BADIE, M. A., and A. K. GHAMRAWI
1931. The growing of figs. Egypt. Min. Agr. Hort. Sect. Giza Booklet 2:1-29. 13 figures.
BALDINI, ENRICO
1953. Alcuni aspetti della coltura del fico nella Provincia di Firenze. Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana
Riv. anno 78:185-203. Figures 1-18. Fifteen varieties described and illustrated.
BALLON
1692. Nouvelle instruction facile pour la culture des figuiers. 111 pp. C. de Sercy, Paris.
BARRON, A. F.
1867. New or little-known fruits. Gard. Chron. 27:1192. November 23.
1868a. Grosse Verte fig. Florist and Pomologist (ser. 3) 1:56.1 figure.
1868b. Do la Madeleine fig. Florist and Pomologist (ser. 3) 1:179-81.1 figure.
1868c. A selection of choice figs. Florist and Pomologist (ser. 3) 1:211-13.
[497]
498 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
BURNETTE, F. H.
1894. Figs at Baton Rouge. Louisiana Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 27:927-28. See also: 36:1274.
CARBOU, J B.
1865a. Figue Blanche à Peau Verte. Rev. Hort. 36:31. Color plate.
1865b. La figue Gourreau Noir. Rev. Hort. 36:131. Color plate.
CARRIÈRE, E. A.
1881. Figuier Osborn Prolific. Rev. Hort. 53:68. Figure 21.
1884. Influence du milieu à propos du figuier Osborn Prolific. Rev. Hort. 56:61, 387.
CASELLA DOMENICO
1952. La voce Dottato. L’Italia Agricola 89:601-4. 2 figures.
CHANDLER, W. H.
1934. The dry-matter residues of trees and their products in proportion to leaf area. Amer. Soc. Hort.
Sci. Proc. 31:39-56.
CHEFFINS, A.
1905. Pingo de Mel fig tree. The Garden 67:274. Illustrated.
CHRIST, J. L.
1809—1812. Vollständige Pomologie. 2 vols. Frankfort. (Feigen, 2:397-408. 3 color plates.) See
also: Pomologisches theoretisch-praktisches Handwörterbuch. 431 pp. Leipzig. 1802.
(Feigenbaum , pp. 241-44.)
CLARK, W. SAM
1920. The Kadota fig. 44 pp. Fig and Olive Journal, Los Angeles. Illustrated.
CLARKE, J.
1883. Brown Turkey fig at Penrhyn Castle. Gard. Chron. (n.s.) 20:405.
CLEMENTE, ARMANDO M., et al.
1953. Recomendações gerais sôbre fruticultura. 42 pp. São Paulo, Brazil. Brief descriptions of six
varieties. (Figueira, pp. 20-21.)
CLOSE, C. P.
1929. Amer. Pomol. Soc. Proc. 1923-1929:l03, 114, 132, 162, 169.
1933. Same. 49:171, 188.
1935. Same. 51:260.
COLBY, GEORGE E.
1894. Analyses of figs. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Rpt. 1892-1893: 226-35.
COLEMAN, W.
1880. Brown Turkey fig. Florist and Pomologist 1880:145. Color plate.
1887a. Fig Pingo de Mel. The Garden 31:232.
1887b. Figs for forcing. The Garden 32:37.
CONDIT, IRA J.
1919. Bits of fig history in California. Calif. State Comm. Hort. Mo. Bul. 8:260-65.
1920a. Caprifigs and caprification. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 319:341-75. Figures 1-23.
1920b. Smyrna figs. Assoc. Grower 1 (6):11—12. August. Illustrated.
1920c. The Kadota fig. Assoc. Grower 1 (8):18, 35. October. Illustrated.
1920d. White Adriatic fig. Assoc. Grower 1 (7):10. September. 1 figure.
1921a. The Mission fig. Assoc. Grower 2 (1):27, 35. January. 2 figures.
1921b. Miscellaneous fig varieties. Assoc. Grower 2 (4): 13: 2 (5): 26. April, May.
1921c. California fig varieties. Calif. Dept. Agr. Mo. Bul. 10:359-66. 2 figures.
1922a. The Stanford Smyrna fig. Assoc. Grower 4 (3):6, 20. October. Illustrated.
1922b. The Brunswick vs. Brown Turkey. Calif. Cult. 59:307. Frontispiece.
1923. Commercial fig varieties. Calif. Fruit News 70(1881) :1, 17; 70 (1882) :4-5.
1924. The fig industry of the Old World: Greece. Assoc. Grower 6 (9-10): 14-15, 22. 2 figures. Also in:
Calif. Fruit News 73 (1980):16-18. June 19, 1926.
1925. Fig industry of Spain. Calif. Fruit News 71 (1911):5, 15; 71 (1912) :13.
1927. The Kadota fig. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 436:1-42: Figures 1-12.
1928a. Gulian P. Rixford-an appreciation. Calif. Countryman 14 (5):10-11. Descriptions of Forbes,
Excelsior, and Kearney caprifigs. Illustrated.
1928b. Other fig chimeras. Jour. Heredity 19:49-53. 3 figures.
1928c. Fig breeding. Jour. Heredity 19:417-23. Figures 9-11.
1933. Fig culture in California. Calif. Agr. Ext. Serv. Circ. 77:1-67. Figures 1-26.
500 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
1941a. Fig characteristics useful in the identification of varieties. Hilgardia 14 (1): 1-68.
Figures 1-25. Plate 1 in color.
1941b. The Brunswick (Magnolia) fig. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 39:143-46.
1942. The Croisic (Cordelia) fig. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 40:255-58.
1944. San Piero, the Brown Turkey fig of California. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 44:211-14.
1947. The fig. 222 pp. Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham.
1950. Fig characters as affected by climate. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 55:114-18.
CONDIT, IRA J., and MESUT BASKAYA
1948. Figs in Turkey. Calif. Farmer 189:218-19.
CONDIT, IRA J., and W. T. HORNE
1933. A mosaic of the fig in California. Phytopath. 23:887-96. 4 figures.
1943. Mosaic spots of fig fruits. Phytopath. 33:719-23. 2 figures.
COOK, L. J.
1925. The fig. The Garden 89:36.
COUVERCHEL, JEAN F.
1839. Traité des fruits. 717 pp. Imprimerie de Bouchard-Huzard, Paris. (Figue, pp. 210-18.)
CUPANI, FRANCESCO
1696. Hortus Catholicus. 237 pp. Fr. Benzi, Naples. (Ficus, pp. 130-41.)
CUSIN, L.
1900. Quelques fruits appréciés par la commission permanente en 1900. Soc. Pomol. de France Bul.
Mens. 1900:301-16. (Figue Panachée, pp.302, 331.)
DAVIS, R. A.
1928. Fruit-growing in South Africa. 532 pp. Central News Agency, Johannesburg. (Fig, pp. 250-61.)
DEAN, R. W.
1904. A prolific fig tree. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 35:102. (Reculver variety.)
DELBARD, GEORGES
1947. Les beaux fruits de France. 166 pp. G. Delbard, Paris. (Figuier, p.70.)
DELPLACE, E.
1933. Manuel d’arboriculture fruitière. 450 pp. J. Lamarre, ed., Paris. (Figuier, pp.
168, 187, 387-91. Figures 415, 416.)
DE ROSA FRANCESCO
1911. Di alcuni fichi Salentini. 36 pp. R. Istit. d’Incorrag. di Napoli Atti (ser. 6) 9.
DOCHNAHL, FR. J
1855-1860. Der sichere Führer in der Obstkunde—oder systematische Beschreibung aller Obstsorten.
4 vols. W. Schmidt, Nuremberg. (Feigen, 4:65-71.)
DONNO, GIACINTO
1951a. La determinazione di alcune varietà di fico della Provincia di Lecce nel periodo invernale.
Facoltà di Agraria Univ. Annali [Napoli] (ser. 3) 19. (Abstract.) 8 pp. Plates 1-4.
1951b. Alcune varietà bifere di fico coltivate in Provincia di Lecce. Facoltà di Agraria Univ.
Annali [Napoli] (ser. 3) 19. (Abstract.) 20 pp. Six varieties described.
1952. Alcune varietà unifere di fico coltivate in Provincia di Lecce. Facoltà di Agraria Univ.
Annali [Napoli] (ser. 3) 19. (Abstract.) 31 pp. Ten varieties described.
DU BREUIL, ALPHONSE
1876. Culture des arbres et arbrisseaux, à fruits de table. 693 pp. G. Masson, Paris. (Figuier, pp.
602-29. Figures 488-510.)
DUCHARTRE, PIERRE E. S.
1857. Flore des jardins de l’Europe. Manuel general des plantes, arbres, et arbustes. Vol. 4. Maison
Agr., Paris. (Figuier, pp. 155-61.)
DUHAMEL DU MONCEAU, H. L.
1755. Traité des arbres et arbustes qui se cultivent en France en pleine terre. 2 vols. E. Michel, Paris.
(Figuier, 1:235-44.)
1768. Same. Later edition. (Figuier, 1:207-17.)
1809. Same. New edition. E. Michel, Paris. (Figuier, 4: 197-232. Color plates 53-59.)
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 501
EARLE, F.S.
1897. Fig culture in the Gulf states. U. S. Dept. Agr. Div. Pom. Bul. 5: 23-32.
1900. Orchard notes. Ala. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 112:157-90. (Figs, pp.167-68.)
EISEN, GUSTAV
1885. Fig culture. Pac. Rural Press 30:126, 138-39.
1887. White Adriatic fig. Florida Agr. 9:399. Also in: Fresno Weekly Republ. 11 (37): 1. May 20.
1888. The fig of commerce. Rural Californian 11:149-56, 177-81.
1896. Biological studies on figs, caprifigs, and caprification. Calif. Acad. Sci. Proc. (ser. 2)
5:897-1001.
1897. Edible figs: their culture and curing. U. S. Dept. Agr. Div. Pom. Bul. 5:5-22
1901. The fig. U.S. Dept. Agr. Div. Pom. Bul. 9:1-317. Illustrated.
ESCRIBANO Y PÉREZ, JOSÉ M.
1884. Pomona de la Provincia de Murcia. 224 pp. Imprenta Hijo de Aguado, Madrid. (Higuera,
pp.133-47.)
ESTELRICH, PEDRO
1910. La higuera y su cultivo en España. 228 pp. Libr. Escolar, Palma. Illustrated.
EVREINOFF, V. A.
1947. Les arbrisseaux à fruits. 133 pp. Flammarion, ed., Paris. (Le figuier, pp. 11-64. Figures 1-39.)
FERRARI, E.
1912. La coltivazione del fico nel circondario di Paola (Cosenza). R. Staz. Sper. Agrum. e Fruttic.
Acireale ann. 1:141-77.
FORNEY, EUGÈNE
1863. Le jardinier fruitier. 2 vols. Arnheiter, Paris. (Le figuier, 2:270-80. Figures 315-25.)
FORRER, JULIUS
1894. Figs at the Tulare station. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Rpt. 1892-1893, and part of 1894:411-14.
FORSYTH, WILLIAM
1803. A treatise on the culture and management of fruit trees. 523 pp. Longmans, London. (Fig,
pp.97-102.)
FOWLER, A.
1865. Castle Kennedy fig. Jour. of Hort. and Cottage Gardener (n.s.) 8:449. Quoted in: Florist and
Pomologist, July, 1865, pp.141-42. See also: Gard. Chron. 1864 : 1228; 1866: 613.
FRANCESCHI, F.
1912. Tropical and semitropical fruit-bearing trees, shrubs, and plants grown at Santa Barbara,
California, in the year 1912. 4 pp. Santa Barbara.
FRUIT-GROWER
1936. Outdoor figs. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 100:133, 147.
GALLESIO, GIORGIO
1817. Pomona Italiana. Vol. I. (See specifically: 92 unnumbered pages on the fig.) N. Capurro, Pisa.
GARIDEL, PIERRE J.
1715. Histoire des plantes. 522 pp. Jos. David, Aix. (Figuier, pp. 174-79.)
GASPARRINI, GUGLIELMO
1845. Ricerche sulla natura del caprifico e del fico, e sulla caprificazione. Accad. Sci. Napoli, rend.
4:321-412. Plates 1-8.
GAYNER, F. C. H.
1949. The amateur fruit-grower in South Africa. In: The Fruit Yearbook, Royal Hort. Soc.,
pp. 79-85. (Fig, p. 81.)
GLADY, E.
1883. Figue San Pietro ou Mecklingea. Rev. Hort. 55:458.
GOULD, H.P.
1919. Fig-growing in the south Atlantic and Gulf states. U. S. Dept. Agr. Farm Bul. 1031: 1-45.
1923. Same. Revised edition.
1935. Same. Revised edition.
502 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
JUIGNET, E.
1909. Culture du figuier à Argenteuil. 24 pp. Published by the author, Argenteuil.
K.
1873. Castle Kennedy fig. Card. Chron. 33:1369. October 11.
KIRKMAN, W. T.
1922. The Black San Pedro fig in southern California. Fig and Olive Jour. 6(7) :7. January. 1 figure.
KNOOP, JEAN H.
1771. Fructologie. 206 pp. M. Magerus, Amsterdam. (Figuier, pp. 94-104.)
L., J.
1890. Madagascar fig. The Garden 37:427.
LA BROUSSE
1774. Traité de la culture du figuier. 83 pp. Valade, Amsterdam.
LAMARCK, J. B. DE
1783-1817. Dictionnaire-encyclopédie méthodique. 13 vols. Panchoucke, Paris. (Figuier,
2:489-92.) See also: Supplement by J. L. M. Poiret. 1783-1808. 5 vols. Paris. (Figuier,
2:648-57.)
LAMBERTYE, LEONCE
1874. Le figuier de Roscoff. Rev. Hort. 1874:437-38.
LANGLEY, BATTY
1728. New principles of gardening. 207 + 191 pp. Printed for A. Bettesworth and J. Batley, London.
(Fig, pp.40, 55, 72-76.)
LA QUINTINIE, JEAN DE
1692. Instructions pour les jardins fruitiers et potagers. 344 pp. Amsterdam. Translated by John
Evelyn, The compleat gard’ner (2 vols., 1693). Printed for M. Gillyflower, London. (Figs,
1:136-37; 2:57-66, 92-93.)
LE BERRYAIS, L. R.
1789. Traité des jardins. Third ed. Belia, Paris. First part: Jardin fruitier. (Figuier, pp.265-72.)
LECLERC DU SABLON, MATHIEU
1908. Observations sur les diverses formes du figuier. Rev. Gen. Bot. 20:129-50, 207-16.
LECLERC, HENRI
1925. Les fruits de France. 274 pp. Masson et Cie., Paris. (La figue, pp. 205-13.)
LELONG, B. M.
1890. The fig. Calif. State Bd. Hort. Ann. Rpt. 1889:115-36. Color plate of White Adriatic.
1892. California fig industry. Calif. State Agr. Soc. Trans. 1891:130-82.
LHÉRAULT, LOUIS
1872. Culture du figuier Blanc d’Argenteuil. 24 pp. Imprimerie Paul Bousrez, Tours.
LIGER, LOUIS
1702. Traité facile pour apprendre à élever des figuiers. 81 pp. D. Beugnie, Paris. In: La culture
parfaite des jardins fruitiers et potagers. (Appendix.)
LINDLEY, GEORGE
1831. A guide to the orchard and fruit garden. 601 pp. Longmans, London. (Fig, pp. 162-73.)
LINDLEY, JOHN
1841. Pomologia Britannica. 3 vols. H. C. Bohn, London. (Fig, 1:48. Color plate of Brunswick.)
LUCKHURST, EDWARD
1880. Grizzly Bourjassotte. Jour. of Hort. 1880:328. See also: Florist and Pomologist 1880:176.
McHATTON, T. H.
1909. Remarks on fig varieties. Georgia State Hort. Soc. Proc. 33. In: Georgia State Bd. Entom.
Bul. 30:63.
M’INTOSH, CHARLES
1855. The book of the garden. 2 vols. Wm. Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh. (Fig. 2:551-58.)
504 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
NAIK, K. C.
1949. South Indian fruits and their culture. 477 pp. P. Varadachary and Co., Madras. (Fig,
pp. 384-89. Color plate 9 of the Poona fig.)
NOISETTE, LOUIS
1821. Le jardin fruitier. 95 + 176 pp. Audot, Paris. (Figuier, pp. 35-41. Plates 10 and 11 show Figue
Blanche and Figue de Bordeaux in color.)
1829. Manuel complet du jardinier. 604 pp. Aug. Wahlen, Brussels. (Figuier, pp. 453-57.)
NOMBLOT, ALFRED
1913. Culture et description des espèces et variétés d’arbres fruitiers. In: Le bon jardinier. (Under the
direction of D. Bois and G. T. Grignon.) Libr. Agricole, Paris. (Figuier, pp. 298-300.)
NORWICH
1898. Fig Castle Kennedy. The Garden 54 :458-59. December 3.
OUNOUS, LÉO D’
1863. Les figuiers du sud-ouest. Rev. Hort. 34:59, 456-57.
OZBEK, SABAHATTIN
1949. Varieties of figs in the Aegean region. Calismalar: Sayi 98, Ziraat Dergisinin. 15 pp.
11 figures. (In Turkish.)
PASQUALE, G. A.
1876. Manuale di arboricoltura. 536 pp. V. Pasquale, Naples. (Del fico, pp. 485-503. Figures
177-85.)
PEARSON, J. R.
1872. Fig culture. Jour. Hort. (n.s.) 23:71.
PELLICANO, A.
1907. Il fico nel circondario de Gerace. Boll. Arbor. Italiana 3:122-50.
PENZIG, O.
1922. Pflanzen-teratologie. 3 vols. Borntraeger, Berlin. (Ficus carica, 3:217-18.)
PLINIUS SECUNDUS, GAIUS (A.D. 23-79).
1855-1890. The natural history of Pliny. English translation by John Bostock and H. T. Riley. 6 vols.
H. G. Bohn, London. (Fig, 3:307-13.)
POITEAU, ANTOINE
1838-1846. Pomologie française. 4 vols. Langlois et Leclercq, Paris. (Ficus, 4: § 9.)
PORTA, GIOVANNI B.
1583. Suae villae pomarium. 323 pp. H. Saluianum, Naples. (Fico, p.130.)
1592. Villae Io. Baptistae Portae. 12 vols. 914 pp. A. Wechel, Frankfort. (De ficu, pp. 300-27.)
PORTALE, F.
1910. La coltivazione del fico nel circondario di Mistretta. Boll. Arbor. Italiana 6:1-53.
POTTS, A. T.
1917. The fig in Texas. Texas Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 208:5-41. Illustrated.
PRESTON, F. G.
1951. The greenhouse. 640 pp. Ward, Lock Co., Ltd., London. (The fig, pp. 197-201.)
PRICE, R. H., and E. A. WHITE
1902. The fig. Texas Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 62:1-29.
PRIEGO Y JARAMILLO, J. M., and S. SÁNCHEZ
1922. La higuera: su cultivo en España. 31 pp. Calpe, Madrid.
REBOUL, M.
1908. Figuiers. Soc. Pomol. de France Bul. Mens. 1908:241, 383.
REIMER, F. C.
1910. Fig culture in North Carolina. North Carolina Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 208:187-206.
RIDGWAY, ROBERT
1912. Color standards and color nomenclature. Published hy the author, Washington, D.C. 53 color
plates.
RISSO, ANTOINE
1826. Histoire naturelle des principales productions de l’Europe méridionale. 5 vols. Levrault,
Paris. (Du figuier, 2:130-71. 1 plate.)
506 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
RIVERS, THOMAS
1873. Fig varieties. Card. Chron. 33:1432. Also in: Florist and Pomologist 6:285.
RIVIÈRE, AUGUSTE
1928. Traité d’arboriculture fruitière. Considérablement augmenté par G. Rivière. 621 pp.
Villefranche. (Figuier, pp. 532-41.)
RIVIÈRE, BENOIT
1907. Figue Osborn Prolific. Soc. Pomol. de France Bul. Mens. 1907:38.
RIVIÈRE, GUSTAVE
1930. Culture du figuier. Soc. Nat. d’Hort. de France Jour. (ser. 5) 3:394-96, 529-31. Figures 17, 18, 22.
RIXFORD, G. P.
1912. Results of recent investigations in fig culture and caprification. Calif. State Comm. Hort. Mo.
Bul. 1:623-33.
1918a. Smyrna fig culture. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 732:1-43. Illustrated.
1918b. Influence on the fig industry of the Maslin seedling fig orchard at Loomis. Fig and Olive Jour.
3(3) :14. August.
1920a. Fig ripening in San Francisco. Pac. Rural Press 100:475.
1920b. A nonsplitting Smyrna fig and its history. Fig and Olive Jour. 4 (8):9. January.
RIXFORD, G. P., and F. HEINY
1911. Interesting event in fig culture. Calif. Cult. 36:390.
ROBERTS, R. M.
1917. The Adriatic fig. Calif. First Fig Inst. Proc. pp. 17-19. Fresno.
RODA, MARCELLINO and GIUSEPPE
1881. Manuale del frutticoltore Italiano. 324 pp. C. P. Paravia, Rome. (Del fico, pp. 237-49. Figures
158-62.)
ROEDING, G. C.
1903. The Smyrna fig at home and abroad. 87 pp. Published by the author, Fresno. Illustrated.
1914. The fig. In: Roeding’s Pract. Hort. 1 (2):1-4. Fresno. Illustrated.
ROGERS, JOHN
1834. The fruit cultivator. 384 pp. J. Ridgway and Sons, London. (Fig, pp. 173-82.)
ROLET, ANTONIN
1916. Le figuier en Provence. La Vie Agricole et Rurale 6:170-72.
ROLLAND, EUGENE
1900-1914 Flore populaire; ou, Histoire naturelle des plantes dans leurs rapports avec la
linguistique et le folklore. 11 vols. Libr. Commissionnaires, Paris. (Ficus carica, 10:61-78.)
ROYAL HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
1916. A list of the most desirable varieties of most kinds of fruit, drawn up by the Royal
Horticultural Society’s Fruit Committee. 190 pp. Spottiswood, Ballantyne and Co., London.
(Fig, pp. 8, 14, 25.)
ROZIER, FRANÇOIS
1781-1805. Cours complet; ou, Dictionnaire d’agriculture. 12 vols. A. Lucques, Paris. (Figuier,
8:418-45.)
S.
1878. Osborn’s Prolific fig. The Garden 14:167.
S., G.
1867. White Marseilles and De la Madeleine figs. Jour. of Hort. (n.s.) 13:212.
1869. Some varieties of figs. Jour. of Hort. and Cottage Gardener (n.s.) 17:394-95.
SAMSON, W . H.
1906. History of the Lob Injir Smyrna fig. 4 pp. Maywood Colony Nursery, Corning, California.
SÁNCHEZ, D. M.
1922. Fruticultura; o, Cultivo de árboles frutales. 204 pp. Bibl. Agr. Solariana, Seville. Illustrated.
(Higuera, pp. l54-74.)
SAUNDERS, WILLIAM
1889. Division of Gardens and Grounds. In: U. S. Secr. Agr. Rpt. 1:111-34. (Figs, pp. 127-28.)
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 507
SAUVAIGO, ÉMILE
1889. Note sur les figuiers introduits et cultivés dans les environs de Nice. Soc. Centr. d’Agr.,
d’Hort., et d’Acclim. de Nice et des Alpes-Maritimes Bul. Mens. 29:144-67.
1894. Les cultures sur le littoral de la Méditerranée. 318 pp. Libr. J. B. Baillière et Fils, Paris.
(Figuier, pp. 225-30. Figure 96.)
1899. Enumération des plantes cultivés dans les jardins de la Provence et de la Ligurie. 414 pp. Nice.
(Figuier, pp. 172-78.)
SAVASTANO, L.
1885. Di alcune colture arboree della Provincia di Napoli. 135 pp. Tip. Ferrante, Naples. (Il fico,
pp. 27-40.)
SAWYER, SAMUEL
1824. On the management of fig trees in open air. Royal Hort. Soc. Trans. 5:346-48.
SCHNEIDER, NUMA
1902. Plantation du figuier. Rev. Hort. 74:143-45.
SEMMOLA, VINCENZO
1845. Della caprificazione; esperienze e raggionamenti. Accad. Sci. Napoli, rend. 4:417-55.
SHINN, C. H.
1892. Fig trees at the experiment stations. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 96:3-6.
1893. The fig in California. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Rpt. 1891-1892:147-57.
1903. Culture work at the substations, 1899-1901. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 147:7-120. (The fig,
pp.15, 54.)
1915. The fig in California. In: The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture [Bailey] 3:1235-38.
SIMONET, M., R. CHOPINET, and J. BACCIALONE
1945. Contribution à l’étude de quelques variétés de figuiers des Alpes-Maritimes et du Var. Rev. de
Bot. Appl. 25:44-72. Illustrated.
SIMONET, M., and R. CHOPINET
1947. Le figuier à Sollies-Pont. Rev. Hort. 118:66-69. Illustrated. 2 color plates.
SIMON-LOUIS FRÈRES
1895. Guide pratique de l’amateur de fruits. 385 pp. Berger-Levrault, Paris. (Figues, pp.19-20.)
SINISCALCHI, A.
1911. La coltivazione del fico nel Cilento. Boll. Arbor. Italiana 7:25-54;
SOCIÉTÉ NATIONALE D’HORTICULTURE DE FRANCE
1928. Les meilleurs fruits. New edition. Sect. Pomologique, Paris. (Figues, p. 139. 3 figures.)
SOCIÉTÉ POMOLOGIQUE DE FRANCE
1887. Catalogue descriptif des fruits adoptés. Lyons. (Figues, pp. 27-33.)
1947. Same. 561 pp. Arnaud Lyons. (Figuier, pp. 89-92.)
SOLMS-LAUBACH, H. GRAF
1882. Die Herkunft, Domestication, und Verbreitung des gewöhnlichen Feigenbaums. Abhandl. K.
Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 28:1-106.
1885. Die Geschlechterdifferenzierung bei den Feigenbäumen. Bot. Zeitung 43:514- 22, 530-39,
546-51, 562-71.
SPENCE, W.
1846. Sussex fig orchard. Gard. Chron. 6:598.
STANSEL R. H., and R. H. WYCHE
1932. Fig culture in the Gulf coast region of Texas. Texas. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul 466: 1-28. Figures 1-14.
STARNES, H. N.
1903. The fig in Georgia. Georgia Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 61:49-74. Plates 1-15.
STARNES, H. N., and J. F. MONROE
1907. The fig in Georgia. (Second report.) Georgia Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 77:42-101. Illustrated.
STUBENRAUCH, A. V.
1903. The culture substations. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Rpt. 1901-1903:161-93. (Figs, pp.171, 192.)
See also: 1903-1904:139.
508 Hilgardia [Vol. 23, No. 11
SWINGLE, W. T.
1905. Figs from Italy. Key to seven principal varieties of Neapolitan caprifigs. In: Inv. No.10, U. S.
Dept. Agr.Bur. Pl. Ind. Bul. 68:230-33.
1909. The Rixford, a new type of Smyrna fig. Pac. Rural Press 77:161, 170. Illustrated.
1928. New crops for Arizona, and the improvement of old ones. Assoc. Ariz. Producer 7(6):3;
5; 10-11; 13. June 1.
SYMEONIDES, P. M.
1930. The production of figs in Cyprus. Cyprus Agr. Jour. 24:106-9.
T.
1907. How to grow figs under glass. The Garden 71:332. Illustration of Bourjassotte Grisé.
T., O.
1905. Figs in pots. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 38:257-58. Figure 96.
TABAIN, F.
1949. A contribution to the study of the morphological and biological properties of our figs. Radovi
Poljoptivred. Naucno-Istrazivack. Ustanova [Belgrade] 1:124-56. See: Pl. Breeding Abs.
21(1327): Figs in Yugoslavia. (Article not seen, and varieties not included in this monograph.)
TAMARO, D.
1948. Tratado de fruticultura. Fourth ed. (Italian version, by Arturo Caballero.) 939 pp. S. Gili,
Cochabamba, Buenos Aires. (Higuera, pp. 800-824. Figures 631-45.)
TANARA, VINCENZO
1651. L’Economia del cittadino in villa del Sig. V. Tanara. 7 vols. 624 pp. Eredi del Dozza,
Bologna. (Fico; pp. 376-80.)
TAYLOR, W. A.
1898. The fruit industry. In: U. S. Dept. Agr. Yearbook 1897:305-44. (Fig, pp. 316-18. Color plate 5.)
THEOPHRASTUS, ERESIOS (372-287 B.C.)
1916. Enquiry into plants. Translated by Sir Arthur Hort. 2 vols. G. Putnam’s Sons, New York. (Fig,
see index.)
THOMAS, OWEN
1902. Fig culture out of doors and under glass. The Garden 61:4l4-15, 432. 2 figures.
THOMPSON, ROBERT
1859. The gardener’s assistant. 774 pp. London. (Fig, pp. 642-49.)
1925. Same. 6 vols. William Watson, ed., London. (Fig, 3:34-44. Figures 33-41.)
TOURNEFORT, J. P. DE
1719. Institutiones rei herbairae. 3 vols. Typ. Regia, Paris. (Figuier, 1:662-63; 3: plate 420.)
First ed. 1700.
TRABUT, L.
1901. La caprification en Algérie. Algérie Dir. de l’Agr. Serv. Bot. Bul. 32:115-38.
1904. Le figuier en Algérie. Algérie Dir. de l’Agr. Serv. Bot. Bul. 38:1-37. Illustrated.
1922. Sur les origines du figuier. Rev. de Bot. Appl. 2:393-96.
1923-1924. Le figuier. Algérie-Tunisie-Maroc Bul. Agr. 29 (2):17-21; (3):33-39; (4):49-60 (figs. 1-18);
(5):73-75 (fig. 19); (6):97-101; (7):117-24 (figs. 20-32); (8):137-49 (figs. 33-39); (10):173-77;
(11):189-92; (12):213-17; 30 (2):25-26.
TRAUB, H.P., and G. S. FRAPS
1928. Ripening and composition of the Texas Magnolia fig. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 25 :306-10.
TSCHAEN, E.
1908. Le figuier à Sollies-Pont. Jour. d’Agr. Prat. 72 (2) :186-87. (Bourjassotte or Barnissotte
exclusively cultivated.)
VALDEYRON, G., and P. CROSSA-RAYNAUD
1950. Les fruits de Tunisie. Ann. Serv. Bot. et Agron. de Tunisie 23 :1-124. (Figues, pp. 83, 101. Color
plate 47.)
VALLESE, F.
1904. La caprificazione in Terra d’Otranto. 68 pp. Tip. Soc. Coop., Lecce. 18 figures.
1909. Il fico. 381 pp. F. Battiato, Catania. Figures 1-123.
February, 1955] Condit: Fig Varieties 509
VAN DEMAN, H. E.
1890. Report of the Pomologist. In: U. S. Secr. Agr. Rpt. 1890:409-24. (Fig, p. 414.)
VAN VELZER, A. C.
1909. Fig culture. 218 pp. Houston.
W., J. S.
1873. Castle Kennedy. The Garden 3:338. May 3.
WARD, H. W.
1904. Fig trees on walls out of doors. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 35 :49-50.
WATTS, R. L.
1890. Fruit trees at the experiment station. Tenn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 3 (5):75-92. (Figs, p. 90.)
WEST, W. B.
1882. Fig-growing in California. Pac. Rural Press 24 :82-83.
WESTON, RICHARD
1770-1777. The universal botanist and nurseryman. 4 vols. Printed for J. Bell, London. (Fig. 1:109;
4:151.)
WHITE, W. N.
1868. Gardening for the South. Revised ed. 444 pp. Orange, Judd & Co., New York.
(Fig, pp. 363-69.)
WOODARD, OTIS
1938. Fig variety test. Georgia Coastal Plain Expt. Sta. Bul. (18th Ann. Rpt.) 29:112.
1940. Same (20th Ann. Rpt.) 31:113.
WOODROOF, J. G., and J. E. BAILEY
1931. Fig varieties and culture. Georgia Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 97:1-4. 2 figures.
WRIGHT, JOHN
1891-1895. The fruit-grower’s guide. 6 vols. Virtue and Co., London. (Fig, 2:170-200. Figures
55-62. 1 color plate.)
WYTHES, G.
1890a. Figs in pots for early fruiting. The Garden 38:430.
1890b. New fig. St. John. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 7:719.
1893. Figs for forcing. The Garden 44:168, 319.
1900a. The Brown Turkey fig. The Garden 58:130. 1 figure.
1900b. Early figs at Gunnersbury House. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 27:132.
1902. Some valuable late figs. Gard. Chron. (ser. 3) 32:205.
Plate 1. Above: Typical tree of Sari Lop near Modesto, California, showing tendency
of branches to become top-heavy and to droop. Below: Typical tree of Dottato at
Mesagne, Italy.
[511]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23. NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 2
Plate 2. Above: Typical tree of Verdone near Fresno, California. Below: Tree of
Brunswick, south side of Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., in 1940. At left, the late
Dr. W. T. Swingle; at right, Capt. Frederick Hollweg.
[512]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 3
Plate 3. Above: Typical tree of Stanford caprifig. Below: Tree of Roeding No.3 caprifig.
Both are near Fresno, California.
[513]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23 NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 4
Plate 4. Above: Typical orchard tree of Sari Lop, with nodal swellings prominent on
large branches. Below: Typical orchard tree of Franciscana. Both are near Fresno,
California.
[514]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 5
Plate 5. Above: Large Franciscana trees that once grew in the Kelsey orchard at
Merced Falls, California. Below: San Pedro fig tree, formerly in park at Parlier,
California. The framework branches show nodal swellings that are unusually
pronounced.
[515]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23. NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 6
Plate 6. Caprifigs, profichi crop. Above: Stanford; Ficus pseudo-carica. Center: Roeding
No. 3; Roeding No. 1. Below: Samson; Milco.
[516]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 7
[517]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 8
Plate 8. Color green to yellow. Above: Dottato (caprified); Blanche; Castellana. Center:
Verdone; Seedling No. 91-12; Sari Lop. Below: Angélique; Troiano; Panachée
[518]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 9
Figure 9. Color medium dark. Above: Malta; Saint Jean; Ischia. Center: Poulette;
Archipel; Madeline. Below: Drap d’Or; Pied de Bœuf; Gouraud Rouge.
[519]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 10
Plate 10. Color dark to black. Above: Beall; Bourjassotte Grisé; Barnissotte. Center: San
Piero; Pastilière; Hâtive d’Argenteuil. Below: Bordeaux; Constantine; Franciscana.
[520]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 11
Plate 11. Pulp color. Above: Dottato (uncaprified and caprified); Franciscana. Center:
Verdone (uncaprified and caprified); Sari Lop. Below: Madeline; Bourjassotte Grisé
(caprified); San Piero.
[521]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 12
Plate 12. Eyes and eye scales. Above: King; Dottato; Troiano. Center: Sari Lop; San
Piero; Madeline. Below: Bourjassotte Grisé; Col de Dame; Figue Fleur, showing lack of
bloom at apex.
[522]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 13
Plate 13. Leaf types, reading left to right. Top row: Ficus palmata; Choer; laciniate leaf
of a seedling; Ischia. Second row: Ficus pseudo-carica; Ischia Black; Excelsior; Stanford
caprifig. Third row: Toulousienne; Sari Lop; Blanche; Jerusalem. Bottom row; Euscaire;
San Pietro; three leaves malformed by mosaic; Brunswick.
[523]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 14
Plate 14. A, Marabout; B, Choer; C, Pied de Bœuf; D, Angélique. All are of second crop.
[524]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 15
[525]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 16
Plate 16. A, B, King, breba and second crop; D, C, Verdone, breba and second crop.
[526]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 17
Plate 17. A, B, San Pedro, breba and second crop; C, Verte; D, Grassale;
E, Noir Moutier. The last three are of second crop.
[527]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 18
Plate 18. A, B, Dauphine, breba and second crop; C, D, Beall, breba and second crop.
[528]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 19
[529]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 20
Plate 20. A, B, Dottato, breba and second crop; C, Bontard; D, Col de Dame.
The last two are of second crop.
[530]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 21
[531]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 22
Plate 22. A, B, Genoa, breba and second crop; C, Gota de Mel; D, Datte.
The last two are of second crop.
[532]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 23
Plate 23. A, Pied de Bœuf, breba; B, E, Saint Jean, breba and second crop;
C, D, Yellow Neches, breba and second crop.
[533]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 24
Plate 24. A, B, San Piero, breba and second crop; C, Drap d’Or; D, Gouraud Rouge.
The last two are of second crop.
[534]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 25
Plate 25. A, San Pietro; B, Bourjassotte Grisé; C, Malta; all three of second crop;
D, E, Bordeaux, breba and second crop.
[535]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 26
[536]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 27
[537]
HILGARDIA, VOL. 23, NO. 11 [CONDIT] PLATE 28
[538]
The journal Hilgardia is published at irregular intervals, in volumes of about 600
pages. The number of issues per volume varies.
Subscriptions are not sold. The periodical is sent as published only to libraries, or to
institutions in foreign countries having publications to offer in exchange.
You may obtain a single copy of any issue free, as long as the supply lasts; please
request by volume and issue number from:
Agricultural Publications
Room 22, Giannini Hall
College of Agriculture
Berkeley 4, California
[539]
(inside back cover)