CON LAW OUTLINE

I. The Federal Judicial Power

A. Requirement for Cases & Controversies
1. STANDING – (Proper Party?) – Plaintiff has suffered a (1) concrete injury in fact, (2) caused
by the defendant that is (3) redressable by the court.
i. Concrete Injury – P must allege and prove that he has personally been injured or
imminently will be injured.
- P may only assert injuries that they personally have suffered
- Need NOT be an economic injury
- P seeking injunctive or declaratory relief must show a likelihood of future harm
- MBE Tip: If asked to determine the best standing identify personal injury. If
more than one, identify personal injury with economic loss ($)
ii. Causation – Must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct.
- P must allege and prove that that the D caused the injury.
iii. Redressability – P must allege and prove that a favorable court ruling is likely to
remedy the harm suffered. NO ADVISORY OPINIONS!
- Note – Often the flip side of causation
- Courts will NOT determine the constitutionality of a statute if it has never been
enforced and there is no real threat that it ever will be.
iv. Third Party Standing – P can only sue to protect his own rights, NOT those of 3Ps
- Exceptions – Must meet the 3 above elements AND:
a. Special or Close Relationship between P and injured party (Dr. –
Patient)
b. Injured party is unlikely to be able to assert his own rights
i. Ex. law criminalizing distribution of contraceptives to
unmarried persons. Doctor allowed to raise rights of
unmarried persons.
c. An Organization may sue for its members, if: (aka association
standing)
i. Members would have standing to sue in their own right
ii. Interests are related to the organizations purpose
1. i.e. Sierra Club can bring an environmental claim.
iii. Individual member participation is NOT required (i.e. no
individual damages requested - injunction)
v. No generalized grievances – P must NOT be suing solely as a citizen or taxpayer
interested in having the government follow the law.
- Exception: taxpayers have standing to challenge government expenditures as
pursuant to federal statutes as violating the Establishment Clause (i.e. Federal
aid to religious schools)
a. NOTE – For a taxpayer to have standing under this exception,
Congress’s spending power must be involved.

1
 - Exception: P has standing to enforce a federal statute if she is within the “zone
of interests” congress meant to protect.
2. RIPENESS – (Avoiding Pre-mature litigation) – May the court grant pre-enforcement review
of a statute or regulation: (2-part test)
i. Hardship that will be suffered without pre-enforcement review
ii. Fitness of the issues and the record for judicial review (does federal court have
everything it needs to decide the question)
- MBE Tip: request for declaratory judgment is a ripeness question
- Ex. challenging statute before signed into law, or challenging a law after
enactment but before it is applied to plaintiff
3. MOOTNESS – A live controversy must exist at ALL stages of litigation. If the matter has
already been resolved, the case will be dismissed as moot.
i. Exceptions
- Capable of repetition but evading review (Roe v. Wade-pregnancy)
- Voluntary cessation – D halts offending practice but is free to resume at any
time
- Class action suits – As long as one member of the class has ongoing injury
ii. Ex. Parties die, events occur or lapse, change in law
4. POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE – Fed cts. will NOT adjudicate political questions that have
constitutionally committed to another branch or inherently incapable of judicial resolution.
i. MBE: just know the following 4 categories will be dismissed as nonjusticiable PQs.
- "Republican form of government clause"
- Foreign Policy – Challenges of the President's conduct of foreign policy (i.e. the
war is illegal)
a. Including president’s ability to rescind treaties, even though Senate
must ratify
- Impeachment or Removal – Challenges to impeachment or removal process
a. i.e. w/n persons elected meet age, residency or voting requirements.
- Partisan Gerrymandering – Challenges to Partisan Gerrymandering
a. Drawing Voting district lines to maximize votes for republicans /
democrats
b. Can still bring a case for anything other than partisan purposes (Race)

B. SUPREME COURT REVIEW (Generally MBE)

1. Original Jurisdiction – Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction for suits
between state governments, cases affecting ambassadors or public ministers.
2. Writ of Certiorari
i. Supreme Court has discretion to grant Writs of Certiorari.
- ALL cases from State Courts and the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court
are by Writ of Certiorari

2
 ii. Supreme Court MUST hear cases that come to it by appeal from decision of a three-
judge federal district courts (appeals skip appellate review and goes to Sup. Ct.)
3. Final Judgment Rule – Only hears cases after final judgment from the highest state court, a US
Court of Appeals, or a three-judge federal district court. (Must be a “case or controversy.”)
i. In other words, generally NO interlocutory review
4. State Law Grounds – The Supreme Court will hear State Cases regarding the constitutionality
of a federal statute, or whether a State Statute violates a federal law.
i. The Supreme Court will not hear a case that rests on an independent and adequate state law
ground of decision.
ii. The Supreme Court will NOT hear the case if reversal of the federal law ground will
NOT change the result because of a companion state law ground. (Can’t overrule state
law decisions)
iii. MBE: Residents file injunction under state and federal environmental law. The State
Supreme Court holds both violate, the Supreme Court cannot review, because
reversal of fed law would not change the outcome.

C. LOWER FED CT REVIEW – 11A (Sovereign Immunity)

a. Rule – Suits against State or Fed. Gov’t ≠ allowed (look for an individual against a state)
b. Exceptions (state may be sued when)
i. States have expressly waived sovereign immunity (consented to suit)
ii. § 5 of the 14th Amendment (i.e. Title VII) – congress adopts fed laws pursuant to this §
iii. Federal Government can sue the state
iv. Bankruptcy proceedings
c. State officers can be sued for:
i. Injunctive relief (Even if it will require prospective payment from the state)
ii. Money damages to be paid by them personally (even if gov’t voluntarily chooses to reimburse
officer)
iii. BUT, ≠ be sued if state treasury will be paying retroactive damages

D. ABSTENTION (rarely tested) just know:

1. Fed. cts may NOT enjoin pending State Court proceedings except in cases of proven
harassment OR prosecutions taken in bad faith. (rarely tested)

II. Federal Legislative Power

A. CONGRESS' Authority to Act (aka Federal Legislative Power)
1. Power must be based on an Express or Implied power
i. NO General Federal police power
ii. Exceptions: MILD – Military Bases, Indian Reservations, Federal Lands, District of
Columbia
2. Necessary and Proper Clause – Congress has the power to make ALL laws necessary and
proper (appropriate) to execute ANY power granted to ANY branch of the fed gov’t

3
 i. The N&P clause standing alone cannot support federal law. It must work in
conjunction with another federal power.
2. Taxing and Spending Power – Congress may tax and spend for the general welfare
i. Taxing – Must raise some revenue
ii. Spending – Spending may be for ANY public purpose.
i. Limited – Although the taxing and spending powers are broad, they are sill limited by
all other constitutional provisions.
ii. MBE: If the answer states general welfare, then must be tax and spending or police
power
3. The Commerce Clause– Congress may regulate the:
i. Channels of interstate commerce (IC); (e.g. highways, waterways, internet)
ii. Instrumentalities of IC and persons or things in IC
- ANYTHING crossing state lines – Trucks, planes, trains, phones, internet,
stocks, insurance, radio signals, cattle, people.
iii. Economic activities that have a substantial effect on IC
- Intrastate Activity: If congress attempts to regulate intrastate activity the court
will uphold the regulation if:
a. It involves economic or commercial activity. (i.e. growing wheat or
medical marijuana), AND
b. Congress can conceive a rational basis that it has a cumulative effect on
interstate commerce.
- Non-Economic Activity – Congress cannot aggregate non-economic activity to
show a substantial effect on interstate commerce. (e.g. possessing a gun in a
school zone, or gender motivated violence)
4. War and Treaty Powers – Congress has the power to declare war, raise and support armies,
and provide for and maintain an army.
i. Remedy the Effects – Economic Regulations during war and in the post war period to
remedy the effects of war have been upheld.
5. Power to Coin Money – Congress has the power to coin money and fix weights and measures.
2. Power Over Citizenship – Congress may establish uniform rules of naturalization. This gives
congress plenary powers over aliens.
3. Congress’s Power under §5 of the 14A
i. Congress may NOT create new rights or expand the scope of rights
ii. May act only to prevent or remedy violations of rights recognized by the courts and
such laws must be proportionate and congruent to remedy the violations
4. 10A Limit on Congress Power – 10A states: all powers NOT granted to the United States, nor
prohibited to the states, are reserved to the states or the people.
i. Congress cannot COMPEL state regulatory or legislative action
1. i.e. ≠ require States to legislate per Fed. standards, or require them to enforce
federal law (against 3Ps)

4
 1) BUT Congress can induce state action by putting conditions on grants, so long
they are express and relate to the purpose of the spending program
a. Conditions cannot be unduly coercive
i. Sebelius – the only case finding the condition was unduly
coercive – Court said that the condition that said they would
lose all Medicaid $ unless they complied was like putting a gun
to a head since they were so dependent on this $.
ii. Congress MAY prohibit harmful commercial activity by state governments.
1) Ex: Prevent state from releasing or selling private information
B. Delegation of Powers
5. Legislative powers MAY be delegated so long as “intelligible standards” are set.
1) General rule: no limits on Congress’ ability to delegate legislative power
(Congress may Delegate ANY Legislative Power)
2) Exceptions – Powers uniquely confined in Congress (declare war,
impeachment)
3) MBE: always the wrong answer choice  Fed law is unconstitutional b/c it is
in excess of delegation of legislative powers
ii. Legislative Vetos and Line-item Vetos = always unconstitutional
1) Congressional action requires:
a. (a) Bicameralism (passage by both the House and Senate)
b. (b) Presentment (presenting the bill to the president for his signature
or veto), and
c. (c) the President must sign or veto it entirely. (line-item veto =
president attempts to veto part of bill while signing the rest into law)
iii. Congress may NOT delegate executive powers to itself or its officers
III. Federal Executive Power
A. Federal EXECUTIVE Power
1. FOREIGN Policy
i. Foreign Relations – President has paramount power to represent the U.S. in day to
day foreign relations.
ii. Treaties – Agreements between the U.S. and foreign country that are negotiated by
President and are effective when ratified by the Senate
1) Power – President has the power to ENTER into treaties with the consent of
two thirds of the Senate.
2) Prevail over conflicting State Laws
3) Conflict between Treaty and Federal Law, the LAST one adopted controls
4) Conflict between Treaty and Constitution, treaty is INVALID
iii. Executive agreements
1) Agreement between U.S. and foreign country that is EFFECTIVE when signed
by President and head of foreign country
a. i.e. NO Senate approval required

5
 2) Can be used for ANY purpose that treaties can be used for
3) Prevail over conflicting State Laws,
4) NEVER prevail over conflicting Federal law or the Constitution
iv. Commander in Chief
1) President has broad powers as Commander-in-Chief to use American troops
in foreign countries
2) MBE: Lawsuit to challenge use of troops – dismissed as political question,
otherwise, President wins.
B. DOMESTIC Affairs
1. Appointment Power
i. President appoints Ambassadors, Federal Judges, and Official Officers of the U.S.
(Senate approves)
ii. Congress may vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President, heads of
departments, or in the lower federal courts
1) Inferior Officer – those that can be fired by an officer of the U.S. (i.e. U.S.
attorneys can be fired by the Attorney General)
iii. Congress may NOT give itself or its officers the appointment power
1) MBE Tip: Congress created new agency – gives appointment rights to
President for some, to Congress for some, and to others - WRONG! (President
must appoint)
2. Removal Power
i. President – unless limited by statute, the President may fire (remove) any executive
branch officer
1) For congress to limit removal, it must be an office where independence from
the President is desirable AND
2) Congress cannot prohibit removal, it can limit removal to where there is good
cause
3) Congress may provide statutory limitations on the president’s power to
remove
b. Note – ≠ prohibit removal, but may limit removal to good cause.
c. Note – Congress can remove executive officers through impeachment.
iv. Veto Power – President has the power to veto acts of congress.
1) Override – If the president disapproves (vetoes) an act of congress, the act
may still become law if the veto is overridden by a two-thirds vote of EACH
house.
2) Pocket Veto – The president has 10 days to exercise the veto power. If he fails
to act then the bill becomes law if congress is in session, but is automatically
vetoed if Congress is NOT is session
3) Line Item Veto – ALWAYS unconstitutional.

6
 v. Impeachment and Removal – The president, vice president, federal judges and
officers of the U.S. can be impeached from the office for treason, bribery, or for high
crimes and misdemeanors.
1) Impeachment does NOT remove person from office
2) A majority vote of the House of Representatives is necessary to invoke the
charges of impeachment. (*Impeachment does not remove)
3) 2/3 vote from Senate is necessary to convict and remove
vi. Executive Privilege / Immunity
1) Privilege – President has executive privilege to keep certain communications
secret. (National security secrets are given great deference by the courts)
a. Exception – In criminal proceedings, presidential communication will
be available to the prosecution.
2) Immunity – President has Immunity from Civil Suits for money damages
involving actions that occurred while in office.
a. NO immunity for actions that occurred prior to taking office
vii. Power to Pardon those accused or convicted of FEDERAL crimes
1) Exceptions:
a. Impeachment – cannot be pardoned for the offenses that led to
impeachment
2) Civil Contempt – pardon power doesn’t apply
3) MBE Tip: Federal ONLY! Criminal Liability ONLY!

C. STATE POWER (FEDRALISM)

6. PREEMPTION (Supremacy Clause of Article VI) – The Supremacy Clause of Article VI

provides that the Constitution, and Laws made pursuant to it, are the Supreme Law of the
land.
i. Express preemption – Federal law says the states may NOT regulate.
1) MBE Tip: States may set stricter environmental standards than EPA, unless
Congress prohibits
ii. Implied preemption
1) Conflict
a. Physical – If you cannot comply with both federal and State Laws, then
federal law preempts
b. Obstacle – If the State law is an obstacle to the Federal Objective, then
federal law preempts
2) Field – Federal interest is so dominant or federal regulation is so pervasive
that it will preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject.
a. Look for comprehensiveness or the federal scheme and creation of an
agency to administer the laws. (Ex: Immigration laws)
b. i.e. congress has left NO room for the states to act

7
 3) States may not tax or regulate federal government activity (inter-
governmental immunity)
a. Unconstitutional to pay a state tax to federal treasury (i.e. a store
owned and operated by federal government, state cannot tax)
b. Federal government never has to comply with state pollution controls)

7. Dormant Commerce Clause & Article 4 Privileges and Immunities Clause

i. Privileges OR Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment – No State may deny their
citizens the privileges or immunities of national citizenship.
1) Interpreted as the right to travel, and the right to vote for federal officers.
2) Look for durational residency requirements.
3) MBE Tip: Always wrong answer unless it involves the right to travel

ii. Dormant Commerce Clause – STATE and LOCAL Laws are unconstitutional if they
place Undue Burden on Interstate Commerce, even though Congress has not acted.
1) MBE – The dormant commerce clause is also called Negative implications of
the commerce clause.
2. TEST – Look to whether the law is:
a. Facially Discriminatory – Discriminates against interstate commerce to
protect local economic interests. (i.e. Tax Ohio $15 all other states $40)
i. Invalid unless it:
1. Furthers an Important Noneconomic State interest AND
a. Examples – health, safety, welfare
2. No Reasonable Nondiscriminatory alternative
ii. Market Participant Exception – A state or local government may
prefer its own citizens when acting as a market participant.
1. Ex. Buying and selling, giving state subsidies. hiring
labor or discounted tuition in State universities.
iii. Traditional Governmental Function – The SC is more lenient
when the law favors a traditional governmental function.
(waste disposal)
iv. Congressional approval – If congress acts to allow the burden
then it is no longer dormant.
b. Non-Discriminatory Laws – i.e. Discriminate in purpose or effect
i. Balancing the state's interest against the burden on interstate
commerce, AND
ii. Consider whether other alternatives could be less burdensome

iii. Privileges AND Immunities Clause of Article IV – Prohibits discrimination by a State

against Non-Residents. (3 Part test)
1) Residents – The law MUST discriminate against Out-of-State Residents

8
 a. Corporations and aliens cannot use this privilege (MAY use Dormant
Commerce Clause or equal protection clause)
2) Fundamental Rights – Only Civil Liberties or Important Economic Activities are
protected.
a. I.e. ability to earn a living, access to courts, emergency services,
purchase property, medical care
b. NOT Elk hunting or recreational activities.
3) Substantial Justification – If the law discriminates against out-of-state
residents with regard to a fundamental right, it violates the privileges and
immunities clause UNLESS:
a. The State has a Substantial Justification for the discrimination
i. i.e. the non residents either cause or are part of the problem.
b. NO Less Restrictive Means to solve the problem.

8. TAXATION
i. Federal Taxation on State Governments
1) Congress may subject states to a regulation or taxation if the law or tax
applies to both the public and private sector. (i.e. minimum wage laws)
2) Federal taxes applying ONLY to states must comply with the 10th amendment.
a. Note – May indirectly regulate through the spending power.
ii. STATES may NOT tax or regulate federal government activity
1) CANNOT pay state tax out of federal treasury
2) Exception – Nondiscriminatory, indirect taxes are permissible (i.e. States
taxing federal employees)
3) MBE Tip: Federal government NEVER has to comply with state environmental
standards
4) MBE Tip: A mom & pop store on federal land. States can Tax because a
private person is paying the tax, not the federal government. (Can’t tax a gov
owned store)
iii. State Taxation (not usually on Bar)
1) Must Not Discriminate – If States use their tax system to help in-state
businesses it will violate the commerce clause. (Tax credits for in-state
businesses)
2) A Non-Discriminatory tax will be valid if: (i.e. Not unduly burdensome)
a. Substantial Nexus – May only tax activities that have a substantial
nexus to the state
b. Fairly Apportioned – State taxation must be fairly apportioned
(Burden is on taxpayer to prove unfair apportionment)
c. Fair Relationship – Fairly related to the state services or benefits
provided

9
 9. FULL FAITH and CREDIT
i. Courts in one state must give full faith and credit to judgments in another state if:
1) Court that rendered judgment had jurisdiction over the parties and subject
matter
2) Judgment was on the merits
3) Judgment is final
a. Ex. Judgment in California MUST be enforced in ANY other state so
long as the judgment has jurisdiction, on the merits and is final.

10. CONTRACTS CLAUSE – No STATE shall impair the obligations of contracts

i. Applies ONLY to State or Local interference with existing contracts
1) NEVER applies to Federal Government
a. Note – flagrant contract impairment would violate the due process
clause
2) NEVER applies to Future contracting rights
ii. Interference with PRIVATE contracts must meet "intermediate scrutiny" (Modified)
1) Substantially Impairment of a party's rights under an existing contract
2) Important and Legitimate Public Interest
3) Reasonable and Narrowly tailored means of promoting that interest
iii. Interference with PUBLIC (government) contracts must meet strict scrutiny
1) Necessary to achieve
2) Compelling government purpose
3) No less Restrictive Alternative (Means must be necessary)

B. PROTECTIONS of CIVIL LIBERTIES

1. STATE ACTION – Constitution only applies to government action, NOT private conduct:
i. EXCEPTIONS (When the constitution applies to private conduct)
1) Statutes – Congress, by statute, MAY apply constitutional norms to private
conduct
a. 13th Amendment can be used to prohibit private race discrimination
i. MBE Tip: Discrimination never violates the 13th Amendment,
only slavery! However, discrimination can violate laws created
under the 13th Amendment, Section 2.
b. NOT 15th Amendment – prevents race and gender discrimination in
voting.
i. Only where some state action is involved
c. Commerce Clause can be used to apply constitutional norms to private
conduct. (i.e. Civil Rights Act enacted under the commerce clause)
d. NOT the 14th Amendment, Section 5 – Only used only to regulate state
and local governments (Not private behavior)

10
 2) Public Function – If a private entity is performing a task Traditionally and
Exclusively performed by the government.
c. Ex. Election primaries, company town, maybe prisons.
d. NOT a shopping center, education facility or public utility
3. Entanglement – government affirmatively Authorizes, Encourages, or
Facilitates unconstitutional activity. (Mere acquiescence is not enough)
a. State Action When
i. Courts enforce racially restrictive covenants
ii. Administering a private discriminatory trust
iii. State leases premises to a discriminatory lessee and the State
derives a benefit from the discrimination (Symbiotic
Relationship)
iv. State provides textbooks to a school that racially discriminated
v. Discriminating private entity that regulates interscholastic
sports within a state
b. NO State Action When
i. Granting a license and providing services to a private club
ii. Granting a monopoly to a Utility Company
iii. Heavily regulating an industry
iv. Private school that is over 99% funded by government fires a
teacher because of her speech
v. NCAA (private entity that operates all over the country) orders
the suspension of a basketball coach at a state university
vi. Private club with a liquor license from the state racially
discriminates

b. BILL of RIGHTS – Limits Federal power

i. Applies directly ONLY to the federal government
ii. ALL rights have been applied to state and local government through its
incorporation into the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
1. Except (Rights that do NOT apply to state and local governments)
a. Second Amendment right to bear arms - Not just for militia but also for
private use for self defense.
b. Third Amendment right to not to quarter a soldier
c. Fifth Amendment right to grand jury indictment in criminal cases
d. Seventh Amendment right to jury trial in CIVIL CASES
e. Eighth Amendment right against excessive fines

c. EX POST FACTO clause does NOT apply in Civil Cases.

i. An ex post facto law is a law that:
1. Criminally punishes conduct that was lawful when it was committed

11
 2. Increases punishment for a crime AFTER it was committed, OR
3. Reduces the Evidence required to convict after the crime was committed.
ii. Retroactive civil liability only need meet a rational basis test under Due Process
iii. MBE Tip: Usually a wrong answer with respect to the contracts clause.

d. BILL of ATTAINDER – a law that directs the punishment of a specific person(s)without a trial
i. MBE Tip: Usually appears in a wrong answer for a contract clause question

e. TAKINGS CLAUSE (5th Amendment) – The government may take private property for public
use if it provides just compensation (Applicable to the states via 14th Amendment)
i. Taking – Critical issue is whether there has been a taking or merely a regulation
1. Possessory taking: Government confiscation or physical occupation of
property is a taking (Gov placing a cable box on your property) (Exception –
Emergencies)
2. Regulatory taking:
a. Denial of ALL economic Value is a taking
i. i.e. prohibition of any building on the land
ii. Nuisance control regulations are NOT takings
iii. Temporarily denying an owner use of property is NOT a taking
so long as the government action is reasonable
iv. A property owner may bring a takings challenge to regulations
that existed at the time the property was acquired
v. Government conditions on development of property must be
justified by a benefit that is roughly proportionate to the burden
imposed, otherwise it is a taking.
b. Decreasing Economic Value does NOT amount to a taking
i. Investment backed expectations test: (Balance)
1. The social goals of the regulation,
2. The diminution in value of the property, and
3. Owner’s reasonable expectations for the use of the
property
ii. No right to the highest and best use of your property
3. Public Use – Broadly defined by the Supreme Court. Rationally related to a
legitimate public purpose i.e. health, safety, welfare, economic, aesthetic
(reasonable belief that the taking is a benefit for the public)
ii. Just Compensation – Measured in terms of loss to owner based on FM (gain to taker
is irrelevant)
4. Compensate owner or terminate regulation and pay owner for damages that
occurred while it was in effect

f. LEVELS of SCRUTINY

12
 i. Rational Basis – (1) Rationally related to a (2) Legitimate government purpose
1. Deferential to government
2. BOP – Challenger (plaintiff) must prove the law had NO conceivable legitimate
purpose or law is not rationally related
3. *ALL non-suspect classifications – Age, disability, wealth, etc.

ii. Intermediate Scrutiny – (1) Substantially related to (1) Important government

purpose (3) Means Narrowly Tailored (But NOT the least restrictive alternative)
1. BOP = Government
2. *Gender and Non Marital Children

iii. Strict Scrutiny – (1) Necessary to achieve a (2) Compelling government purpose (3)
No less Restrictive Alternative (Means must be necessary)
1. Will look ONLY at the government’s actual objective (must be compelling)
2. BOP = Government
3. *Race, national origin, alienage, interstate travel, privacy, voting, 1st
Amendment

g. DUE PROCESS
i. PROCEDURAL Due Process – Refers to the procedures the government must follow if
deprives a person of life, liberty, or property. (2 Part Test – Deprivation /
Procedures)
1. Has there been a DEPRIVATION of life, liberty or property?
a. Liberty – A deprivation of Liberty occurs if there is the loss of a
significant freedom provided by the Constitution or a statute.
i. Examples:
1. Prisoners rarely have liberty interests
2. Institutionalize of child by parent requires screening by
neutral fact finder
3. Harm to reputation alone is NOT a deprivation of liberty
4. Except in an emergency before an adult can be
institutionalized there must notice and a hearing
b. Property – A deprivation of Property occurs if there is an
Entitlement and that entitlement is NOT fulfilled
i. Entitlement – reasonable expectation to continue to receive a
benefit (This is the new test)
1. Attendance at public school, welfare benefits,
government employment, personal belongings, and
realty.
c. Intentional Deprivation – Government negligence is not sufficient
for a deprivation of due process. Generally there must be

13
 intentional government action or at least reckless action for liability
to exist.
i. Emergency – However, in emergency situations, the
government is liable under due process only if its conduct
"shocks the conscience." (i.e. high speed chase not)
ii. Waiver – Individuals may expressly waive due process.

d. Government Must Create the Danger – Generally the government’s

failure to protect people from privately inflicted harm does not
violate.
i. Government is only liable if it deprives an interest or if it
creates danger or if in government custody

2. If there IS a Deprivation, What procedures are required?

a. Balancing Test
i. Individuals Interest
ii. Value of Safeguards – The ability of additional procedures to
increase the accuracy of the fact-finding
iii. Government Interest (Efficiency and saving money)

3. Procedure Requirements:
a. Prior Notice and Prior Hearing
i. Welfare Benefits terminated
ii. Resident aliens being deported
iii. Before rights to a child are permanently removed
iv. Adult Commitment to Mental Institution
2. Child – Only a screening by a neutral fact finder is
required for a parent to institutionalize a child
v. Termination of a parent’s custody rights
vi. Real property forfeiture (government seizure)
1. Except in emergency circumstances
2. Government can seize property in an illegal activity even
if it has an innocent owner
b. Prior Notice and a Post Hearing
i. Social Security/Disability benefits terminated
ii. Public Employment (Tenure / Termination)
1. Employee entitled to a pre-termination
response/hearing, but only entitled to full
adversarial hearing after termination
c. Subsequent Notice and a Subsequent Hearing

14
 i. American citizen captured in foreign war and held as enemy
combatant in U.S. (trial, jury, counsel)
ii. Personal Property forfeiture
3. Exception – Government may seize property from an
innocent owner (co-owner) if used in criminal activity
d. Notice and chance to explain
i. Public education discipline / dismissal – notice of charges and
chance to explain
1. corporate punishment schools – NO due process
required
e. Instructions to the jury and judicial review
i. Punitive damage awards – grossly excessive punitive damages
are a violation of due process

h. SUBSTANTIVE Due Process – (5th amendment) – Determines whether the government has a
justified reason for taking away a person’s life, liberty or property. (Applies to the states via
the 14th Amendment)
i. Non-Fundamental Rights – Constitution provides minimal protection for economic
liberties (Non-fundamental rights)
1. Rational basis test is used for laws affecting economic rights
2. Economic Rights – The right to practice a trade or profession
ii. Fundamental Rights – Apply Strict Scrutiny to the following Rights:

1. PRIVACY (Strict Scrutiny)

a. Marry
b. Procreate
c. Custody of One's Children – State may create irrebuttable
presumption that married woman's husband is biological father
d. Keep the Family Together – Includes extended family, but must be
actually related (cousins, grandma)
e. Control the upbringing of one’s children
ii. Note – NO right to grandparent visitation over parents
objections
f. Purchase and Use Contraceptives
g. Freedom to receive Obscene Reading Material – (Except child
porno)
h. Engage in Private Homosexual Activity
i. Refuse Medical Treatment
i. Competent adults have the right to refuse medical treatment,
even in life-saving situations

15
 ii. State may require clear and convincing evidence that a person
wanted treatment terminated before it is ended
iii. State MAY prevent family members from terminating treatment
for another
iv. NO constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide
j. Abortion (not Strict Scrutiny)
i. Prior to viability (fetus survival outside womb) – States may
NOT prohibit abortions, but may regulate abortions so long as
they do not create an UNDUE BURDEN on the ability to obtain
an abortion.
ii. NOT and undue burden
2. 24 hr waiting period
3. Performed by licensed physicians
4. Prohibition of "partial birth abortions"
5. Parental notice and consent for unmarried minors
a. Alternative – Minor can obtain an abortion by
going before a judge who can approve the
abortion by finding it would be in the minor’s
best interest or that she is mature enough to
decide for herself
iii. After Viability – States MAY prohibit unless necessary to protect
the woman's life or health
iv. Note – Government has NO duty to subsidize abortions or
provide abortions in public hospitals
v. Note – Spousal consent and notification laws are
unconstitutional

2. 2nd Amendment – Right to bear arms for protection (no level of scrutiny
identified)

3. TRAVEL (Strict Scrutiny)

a. Laws that prevent people from moving into a state
b. Durational residency requirements for receiving benefits
vi. 1 year residency requirement to get divorced
c. Note – Restrictions on foreign travel need meet only the rational
basis test

4. VOTE (Strict Scrutiny)

a. Laws that DENY some citizens the right to vote
i. Durational residency requirements up to 50 days are valid
ii. NOT property ownership as a qualification to vote

16
 b. The use of race in drawing election district lines
c. Counting uncounted votes without standards in presidential
elections violates equal protection
d. One-person, One-vote must be met for all state and local elections
i. Exception – Appointed officials, officials elected at-large, or
special purpose elections (i.e. water district) do not have to
comply with one person one vote requirement.

5. EDUCATION – NO fundamental right to education (Rational Basis Test)

2. EQUAL PROTECTION – (5th Amendment) – Determines whether the government’s different

treatment of people is justified. (Applies to the states via the 14th Amendment)

a. Approach to equal protection questions

i. Did the government have intent to discriminate?
ii. What is the classification?
iii. What level of scrutiny should be applied?
iv. Does this law meet the level of scrutiny?

b. INTENT TO DISCRIMINATE – In order to trigger strict / intermediate scrutiny, you must

prove that the government intended to discriminate. If NO intent can be shown apply
Rational Basis. Intent may be shown by:
i. A law that is discriminatory on its face
ii. A discriminatory application of a facially neutral law
1. Ex: discriminatory use peremptory challenges based on race
iii. A discriminatory motive behind the law
1. Note – Showing a discriminatory effect alone is NOT enough.
2. Ex. Height/weight restrictions for police/fire-fighters (Gender)

c. CLASSIFICATIONS
i. Race and National Origin
1. Strict Scrutiny is applied
a. Necessary to achieve
b. Compelling government purpose
c. No less Restrictive Alternative (Means must be necessary)
2. Proving Racial Classification
a. Classification exists on the face of the law
b. If the law is facially neutral, must show discriminatory impact AND
discriminatory intent

17
 i. i.e. discriminatory use of peremptory challenges based on race
denies equal protection
3. Racial discrimination Benefiting minorities (Strict scrutiny is still applied)
a. Government has a compelling interest in remedying past discrimination
i. Numerical set-asides require clear proof of past discrimination
ii. Past discrimination must have been persistent and readily
identifiable. (i.e. NOT general societal discrimination)
b. Race can be considered in drawing up new voting districts but cannot
be the predominant factor.
c. Educational institutions may use race as one factor in admissions
decisions to help minorities. (Colleges and Universities)
i. No set asides or points added to admissions applications for
minorities
d. Public school systems may NOT use race as a factor in assigning
students to school unless strict scrutiny is met

ii. Alienage Classifications (Non-Citizens) Look to who is discriminating against Aliens?

1. State and Local Government – Apply Strict Scrutiny
a. Ex. Requiring citizenship status for welfare benefits, civil service jobs,
to become a lawyer or a notary.
b. EXCEPTIONS
i. Self Government and Democratic Process – apply rational basis.
1. i.e. for voting, jury duty, and employment as police
officer, teacher, probation officer
ii. Undocumented Alien Children – Apply intermediate scrutiny
1. Ex: state making undocumented aliens pay for public
school
2. Federal Government – (Congress) – Apply a rational basis test
a. Rational basis because of Congress has plenary power to regulate
immigration.

iii. Gender Classifications

1. Intermediate scrutiny is used
a. Substantially related to an
b. Important government purpose
c. Exceedingly Persuasive justification
2. Proving Gender classification
a. Classification exists on the face of the law
b. If the law is facially neutral, must show discriminatory impact AND
discriminatory intent

18
 i. i.e. discriminatory use of peremptory challenges based on
gender denies equal protection
3. Racial classifications Benefiting gender
a. Intentional discrimination benefiting Women / Men triggers strict
scrutiny
i. Laws Found to be Invalid
1. Woman can be awarded alimony, but men can not
2. State supported all male / all female school
3. Discriminatory minimum drinking age
4. Classifications benefiting women based on role
stereotypes
ii. Laws Found to be Valid
1. Discriminatory statutory rape laws
2. All male draft
3. Classifications designed to remedy past discrimination
and differences in opportunity
b. Note – Government has a important government interest in remedy
past discrimination and differences in opportunity

iv. Homosexual Marriages

1. The federal government must provide the same benefits to same sex married
couples as to opposite sex couples if the state in which they live recognizes
such marriages.
a. To do otherwise violates the equal protection clause.
2. States are NOT required to allow homosexuals to marry.

v. Non-Marital Children (Parents aren’t Married)

1. Intermediate scrutiny is used
a. Laws that deny a benefit to ALL non-marital children, BUT grant it to
ALL marital children are unconstitutional

vi. Rational basis review is used for all other types of discrimination.
1. Age – (i.e. mandatory retirement age – Rational basis & Government wins)
2. Disability
3. Wealth – (Discrimination against the poor)
4. Economic Regulations (Requiring to work for a certain number of years)
5. Sexual orientation (Only case so far used rational basis)
6. Religion (Strict Scrutiny has been used under religion clauses but has not
been considered under equal protection)

19
3. FIRST AMENDMENT
a. FREE SPEECH
i. Content-based v. Content-neutral restrictions
1. Content Based restrictions on speech generally must meet strict scrutiny
a. Necessary to further
b. Compelling Government purpose unrelated to suppression
c. Means Narrowly Tailored
d. Two types:
i. Subject matter (law depends on the topic of the message)
ii. Viewpoint (depends on the ideology of the message)
1. Ex: pro-war v. anti-war; pro-government v. anti-
government
2. Content Neutral laws burdening speech generally must meet intermediate
scrutiny
a. Substantially related to an
b. Important government purpose unrelated to suppression
c. Burden NO more speech than necessary
i. Ex: No parades or demonstrations in the park

ii. Prior Restraints – judicial order or administrative system that stops speech before it
occurs. Prevent speech from ever entering the marketplace of ideas
1. Injunctions – must be special societal harm that will result
a. A valid prior restraint requires:
i. Standards narrowly drawn (reasonable and definite)
1. Includes only prohibitable speech
ii. Promptly sought
iii. Prompt and final determination of validity of restraint
1. Can’t leave inj in place pending an appeal that could take up to a year.
2. Court Orders – Court orders suppressing speech must meet strict scrutiny
a. Procedurally proper orders must be complied with until vacated or
overturned
b. Person who violates is barred from later challenging it
c. MBE Tip: Gag orders on press to prevent prejudicial pretrial press are
always unconstitutional – prior restraints preventing newspaper from
publishing is always unconstitutional
d. Ex. Prohibited from publishing war and troop movement during the
war.
3. Licenses – Government can require a license for speech only if there is an
important reason for licensing and clear criteria that leaves almost NO
discretion to the licensing authority.
a. Must contain procedural safeguards such as prompt determination of
requests for licenses and judicial review

20
iii. Vague, Overbroad, Unfettered Discretion (Void on its face)
1. Vague – law is void on its face if a reasonable person cannot tell what speech
is prohibited or allowed (“reasonable”, “annoying”, “lewd”)
2. Overbroad – law is void on its face if it regulates substantially more speech
than the constitution allows to be regulated. (“All”, “Any” speech)
a. Note – Fighting words are not protected by the first amendment but
are always found to be vague and overbroad
3. Unfettered Discretion – law is void on its face if it gives officials unfettered
discretion in applying the law. (Need definite standards)
a. Ex. City officials cannot have discretion to set permit fees

iv. Anonymous Speech / Right NOT to Speak IS protected

1. Circulating an anonymous leaflet is constitutional. (Can speak anonymously)
2. The freedom to speak also includes the freedom NOT to speak (“live free or
die”)
a. Exception – The government may TAX you and use the revenue to
support a message with which you disagree. (Got Beef? Advertising)
i. Note – Cannot be compelled to subsidize private messages
1. i.e. Lawyers and teachers must pay union dues, but do
NOT have to pay for contributions to a political
campaign
ii. Note – CAN be compelled to pay university activity fee that is
used to support political speech by student groups.

v. Symbolic Speech (Intermediate Scrutiny)

1. Government can regulate conduct that communicates if:
a. Substantially related to an
b. Important government purpose unrelated to suppression
c. Burden NO more speech than necessary to achieve the government
purpose
2. Examples:
a. Flag burning IS protected
b. Burning cross IS protected UNLESS done to intimidate or threaten
i. Burning cross on home of African American family ≠ protected
ii. Burning cross in private with other members = ok
c. Draft card burning is NOT (Facilitate a smooth draft)
d. Nude dancing is NOT
e. Election Campaigns
i. Contribution limits ARE constitutional (allowed) – (gov can
limit amount a person contributes on candidate or committee
for an candidate

21
 ii. Expenditure limits are unconstitutional (gov’t cannot limit how
much a person spends on her own campaign or
candidate/party)

vi. Speech by the government CANNOT be challenged as violating the First Amendment

b. UNPROTECTED or LESS PROTECTED Speech

i. Incitement of Illegal Activity – Government MAY punish speech if there is a:
1. Directed to Inciting of Imminent Lawless Action, and
2. Actions are Likely to produce imminent lawless action
a. Courts ask whether the words caused a substantial likelihood the
words would cause imminent illegal activity + the words were
intended to do so.
ii. Fighting Words – Abusive words that are inherently likely to provoke an immediate
violent reaction in a ordinary person
iii. True Threats – Threat combined with an intent to intimidate (Burning cross in Black
persons front yard)
iv. Obscenity (Sexually-oriented speech)
1. Obscenity requires: (1) material appeals to prurient interest, (2) patently
offensive, (3)
2. The Test
a. Whether the average person, applying Contemporary Community
Standards would find that the work taken as a whole, must appeal to
the Prurient Interest in Sex
i. Prurient – shameful or morbid interest in sex
b. Whether the work depicts or describes in a Patently Offensive way,
sexual conduct as specifically defined by the applicable State Law
i. The law must specifically list what material is patently offensive
ii. Based on a Contemporary Community Standard
c. Taken as a whole, the material must lacks serious literary, artistic,
political or scientific value
i. Based on a National standard (LAPS)
3. Obscenity Notes
a. Zoning Ordinances – Government may use zoning ordinances to
regulate the location of adult bookstores and movie theaters
(substantial gov. interest)
i. Young – Detroit case limited amount of adult book/movie
theaters that can be on any block – Court upheld this.
ii. City of Renton v. Playtime Theaters – law required all adult
books/movie theaters in a corner of town that was <5% of less
of the entire city – Court upheld.

22
 b. Child Pornography – Child pornography may be completely banned,
even if it is NOT obscene
i. Governments interest is in protecting children, so children must
be used in the material (Not computer generated images)
c. Private Possession – Government may NOT punish private possession
of obscene materials, but MAY punish private possession of child
pornography
d. Seize Assets – Government may seize the assets of business convicted
of violating obscenity laws
e. Profane and Indecent speech – is generally protected. (i.e. Cohen –
Fuck the Draft)
i. Exceptions (May regulate)
1. Over the broadcast media (free media) – Policy – They
accepted the license with the conditions
a. Fairness doctrine – May be required to allow
counter-speech. (i.e. to persons attacked on the
air)
b. Cable Television – intermediate scrutiny
2. Schools – "Schools are responsible for teaching civilized
discourse"

v. Commercial Speech (4 Part Test)

1. Not false, misleading, or concerns unlawful activity (if it is, government can
regulate it)
a. May prevent professionals from advertising under a trade name
b. May prohibit an attorney from in-person solicitation of clients for profit
i. May send written solicitation or solicit for pro-bono work
c. May NOT prohibit accountants from in-person solicitation of clients
2. Substantial government interest
a. i.e. conserving energy or protecting kids from cigarette advertising
3. Regulation directly advances in a material way
a. Ask, will this regulation actually be effective?
4. Reasonable fit – No more extensive than necessary to serve that interests

vi. Defamation – See Torts outline

vii. Privacy
1. The government may NOT create liability for the truthful reporting of
information that was lawfully obtained from the government
a. Ex. Reporting rape victims name from a police report

23
 b. However, the government may limit its OWN dissemination of
information to protect privacy (Ex. Close trials to preserve a higher
value)
2. Media is NOT liable for broadcasting a tape of an illegally intercepted call, if:
a. The media did NOT participate in the illegality and
b. It involves a matter of public concern.

viii. NOTE – Speech by government employees on the job in the performance of their
duties is NOT protected by the First Amendment.

ix. NOTE – ANY other government restrictions based on the content of speech must meet
strict scrutiny

c. Time, Place, and Manner

i. Public forums – government properties that have historically been open to speech
related activities. (streets, sidewalks, public parks)
1. Regulations that are NOT subject matter OR viewpoint neutral must meet
strict scrutiny.
2. Regulations that ARE subject matter AND viewpoint neutral must meet
intermediate scrutiny (Content Neutral)
a. Content neutral regulation
b. That serves an Important government purpose
c. Means Narrowly tailored (NOT the least restrictive alternative)
d. Leaves Open and Adequate Alternative channels of communication
i. Ex: In order to have concert in city park, must use city sound
equipment. Bands argued that there was a least restrictive
alternative of setting volume levels. City won.
ii. Note – Congress has more leeway with funding than regulations.
3. City officials cannot have discretion to set permit fees for public
demonstrations.
ii. Limited Public Forums (designated) – government properties that the government
could close to speech, but chooses to open. (Same rules apply as to public forums)
1. Ex: Opening schools on evenings and weekends for speech
iii. Non-Public Forums – government properties that the government constitutionally
can and does close to speech.
1. Government MAY regulate speech so long as regulation is Reasonable and
Viewpoint neutral.
2. Examples:
a. School facilities on evenings and weekends
b. Military Bases

24
 c. Area around Prisons and Jails
d. Advertising space on City Buses
e. Sidewalks on Post Office Property
f. Airports – can distribute literature, but not ask for money
iv. Injunctions
1. Content Based – Necessary to achieve a compelling Government interest
2. Content Neutral – Challenged provisions burden no more speech than
necessary to serve a significant government interest.
v. Private Property
1. There is no First Amendment right of access to private property for speech
purposes (Includes shopping centers)

4. Freedom of Association
a. Laws that Prohibit or Punish Group Membership must meet Strict Scrutiny.
i. Must be proven that the person:
1. Actively affiliates with the group
2. Knew of its illegal activities, AND
3. Participated with the specific intent of furthering those illegal activities
b. Laws that require disclosure of group membership, Look to see if there is a substantial
burden on the right of association? (chill association) If so, Government must prove Strict
Scrutiny
c. Laws that prohibit a group from discriminating are Constitutional unless they: (Strict
Scrutiny)
i. Substantially interfere with an:
1. Intimate association – Small dinner party – person not invited cannot sue
2. Expressive activity – KKK can exclude blacks; Boy scouts can exclude gays
d. Political Patronage – government has the ability to demand loyalty of a party that is
currently in office. Test – Appropriate requirement for the effective performance

5. Freedom of Religion
a. Free Exercise clause
i. Free exercise clause cannot be used to challenge a Neutral law of General
Applicability
1. Ex: Use of peyote by Native Americans in religious ceremony was prohibited
by state law that was neutral to everyone and did not target that religion. Law
was found to be constitutional
2. Strict Scrutiny is applied if the law was motivated to interfere with the
exercise of religion. (Ex. Law prohibiting the sacrificing of animals)
ii. Government may NOT deny benefits to individuals who quit their jobs for religious
reasons. (Ex: Employee quit over working on Sunday)

25
b. Establishment clause – Government may NOT make a law establishing religion.
i. Test (SEX)
1. There must be a Secular purpose for the law
2. The Primary Effect Neither Advance nor Inhibits religion
a. Ex: No government symbolic endorsement of a particular religion
b. However, government may be able to display many religious symbols.
3. There must NOT be EXcessive Government Entanglement with religion
a. Ex: Government cannot directly pay teacher's salaries in religious
schools
ii. Establishment Clause Notes
1. Government cannot discriminate against religious speech or religions unless
strict scrutiny is met.
2. Government sponsored religious activity in public schools is unconstitutional
a. i.e. school prayer, moment of silence
b. But Note – Religious students and groups must have the same access to
school facilities as non-religious groups
3. Government MAY give assistance to religious schools, so long as it is NOT used
for religious instruction. (Ok for school buses)
4. May provide parents vouchers which they MAY use in private or public
schools

26