OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ROMEO E. BALLESTEROS Name of Rater: MILDRED D. DAYAO, Ed. D

Position: PRINCIPAL II Position: Chief Curriculum Implementation Division
Review Period: MAY 2017 – APRIL 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BALIWASAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL- STAND ALONE , Zamboanga City Division
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE ACTUAL RESULTS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Q E T Ave
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
QUALITY: 5 5 5 .5
2.1 Managed DepEd mandated
(5) – All programs were above the
programs and projects within standard (based on the rating of each
the school year for holistic assessing body)
(4)- Some of programs were above the
development of the students by standard (based on the rating of each
all stakeholders of the school assessing body)
(3) – All programs were within the
through the implementation of standard (based on the rating of each
programs such as May 2017- 10% assessing body)
 Project MANE- April 2018
(2)- Some programs were below the
standard (based on the rating of each
Child Protection assessing body)
LEARNING Program (1) – All programs were below the
standard (based on the rating of each
ENVIRONMENT  Project WATCH assessing body)
(20%)  Deworming and
EFFICIENCY:
vaccination
 SDRRM (5) – All programs were implemented.
(4)- Only 4 programs were
 GAD implemented
(3) - Only 3 programs were
implemented
(2)- Only 2 programs were
implemented
(1) – Only 1 program implemented
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: ROMEO E. BALLESTEROS Name of Rater: MILDRED D. DAYAO, Ed. D
Position: PRINCIPAL II Position: Chief Curriculum Implementation Division
Review Period: MAY 2017 – APRIL 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BALIWASAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL- STAND ALONE , Zamboanga City Division
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE ACTUAL RESULTS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Q E T Ave
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
2.2 Rehabilitated physical QUALITY:
resources of the school by (5) – All rehabilitations were above the
teachers and administration standard (based on the rating of each 4
to make the learning assessing body)
(4)- Some of rehabilitations were
environment more above the standard (based on the rating
conducive to learning by of each assessing body)
(3) – All rehabilitations were within the
conducting repairs on standard (based on the rating of each
chairs, ceilings, and other May 2017- 5% assessing body)
(2)- Some rehabilitations were below
basic utilities, repainting of April 2018 the standard (based on the rating of each
the classrooms, and assessing body)
LEARNING improving the school (1) – All rehabilitations were below 4.5 0.225
the standard (based on the rating of each
ENVIRONMENT grounds. assessing body)
(20%)
EFFICIENCY:
(5) – Rehabilitated and repaired all
5
resources
(4)- Rehabilitated and repaired 90%
of the resources
(3) - Rehabilitated and repaired 80% of
the resources
(2)- Rehabilitated and repaired 70% of
the resources
(1) – Rehabilitated and repaired
Rehabilitated and repaired 60% of the
resources
Name of Employee: ROMEO E. BALLESTEROS Name of Rater: MILDRED D. DAYAO, Ed. D
Position: PRINCIPAL II Position: Chief Curriculum Implementation Division
Review Period: MAY 2017 – APRIL 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BALIWASAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL- STAND ALONE , Zamboanga City Division
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE ACTUAL RESULTS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Q E T Ave
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
EFFICIENCY:

(5) – Provided 100 % support to

2.3 Provided support to teachers teachers on instructional requirements.
by administration on (4)- Provided 90% support to teachers
on instructional requirements.
instructional requirements (3) – Provided 80 % support to teachers
for effective learning. on instructional requirements. 5 4
(2)- Provided 70 % support to teachers
on instructional requirements.
May 2017- 5% (1) – Provided 60 % support to teachers
on instructional requirements.
April 2018
4.5 0.225
LEARNING TIMELINESS:
ENVIRONMENT
(5) – Support given proactively ahead
(20%) of time
(4)- Support given on time
(3) - Support given one day after the
request
(2)- Support given 3 days after the
request.
(1) – support given 1 week after the
request.

0.95
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: ROMEO E. BALLESTEROS Name of Rater: MILDRED D. DAYAO, Ed. D
Position: PRINCIPAL II Position: Chief Curriculum Implementation Division
Review Period: MAY 2017 – APRIL 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BALIWASAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL- STAND ALONE , Zamboanga City Division
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE ACTUAL RESULTS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Q E T Ave
KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
EFFICIENCY:
3.2 Provided technical 5
(5) – Provided 100% technical
assistance to teachers and assistance to teachers and non-teaching
non-teaching personnel personnel
(4)- Provided 90% technical
pertaining to personal and assistance to teachers and non-teaching
professional development. personnel
(3) – Provided 80% technical
assistance to teachers and non-teaching
personnel 5 0.25
May 2017- 5% (2)- Provided 70% technical
HUMAN April 2018 assistance to teachers and non-teaching
RESOURCE personnel
(1) – Provided 60% technical
MANAGEMENT assistance to teachers and non-teaching
AND personnel
5
DEVELOPMENT TIMELINESS:
(15%)
(5) – Support given proactively ahead
of time
(4)- Support given on time
(3) - Support given one day after the
request
(2)- Support given 3 days after the
request.
(1) – Support given 1 week after the
request.
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: ROMEO E. BALLESTEROS Name of Rater: MILDRED D. DAYAO, Ed. D
Position: PRINCIPAL II Position: Chief Curriculum Implementation Division
Review Period: MAY 2017 – APRIL 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BALIWASAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL- STAND ALONE , Zamboanga City Division
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight ACTUAL RESULTS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave
KRA
EFFICIENCY:
3.3 Develop structures and 4
(5) – Provided 100% support to teachers
processes to assist Admin sector on the HRM and HRD aspect.
in administering policies. (4)- – Provided 97% support to teachers
on the HRM and HRD aspect
(3) – – Provided 80% support to teachers
on the HRM and HRD aspect
(2)- – Provided 70% support to teachers 4.5
on the HRM and HRD aspect
(1) – – Provided 60% support to 0.225
May 2017- 5%
teachers on the HRM and HRD aspect .
April 2018
HUMAN RESOURCE
TIMELINESS:
MANAGEMENT 5
AND (5) – support given proactively ahead of
time.
DEVELOPMENT (4)- support given on time.
(15%) (3) - support given one day after the
request

(2)- support given 3 days after the

request
(1) – support given 1 week after the
request

0.7
 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: ROMEO E. BALLESTEROS Name of Rater: MILDRED D. DAYAO, Ed. D
Position: PRINCIPAL II Position: Chief Curriculum Implementation Division
Review Period: MAY 2017 – APRIL 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/ Center/ Service/ Division: BALIWASAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL- STAND ALONE , Zamboanga City Division
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight ACTUAL RESULTS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T Ave
KRA

(5) – addressed to all complaints

4.1 Addressed complaints of (4)- addressed to 90% of the complains
different stakeholders (3) – addressed to 80% of the
groupings by administration complains 5 5 5 0.25
(2)- addressed to 70% of the complains
to improve educational (1) – addressed to 60% of the
system complains

PARENTS’ TIMELINESS:
May 2017- 5%
INVOLVEMENT April 2018
AND COMMUNITY (5) – complaints addressed on time.
(4)- complaints addressed one week
PARTNERSHIP after
(15%) (3) - complaints addressed 15 days
after
(2)- complaints addressed one month
after
(1) – complaints addressed one months
after

0.65