Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 118 views

    Demonstration Rating Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Jay Mark Reponte
    This document contains a student teaching performance appraisal form used to evaluate student teachers in the College of Education at MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology in the Philippines. The form assesses student teachers across 7 categories on a scale of 100-95 (Excellent) to 79-75 (Needs Improvement). The categories cover the teacher's personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methodology, classroom management, questioning skills, and communication skills. At the end, overall ratings are provided for each category and a general average rating. Space for comments and suggestions is also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Demonstration Rating Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Jay Mark Reponte
    118 views3 pages
    This document contains a student teaching performance appraisal form used to evaluate student teachers in the College of Education at MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology in the Philippines. The form assesses student teachers across 7 categories on a scale of 100-95 (Excellent) to 79-75 (Needs Improvement). The categories cover the teacher's personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methodology, classroom management, questioning skills, and communication skills. At the end, overall ratings are provided for each category and a general average rating. Space for comments and suggestions is also included.

    Original Description:

    Demonstration rating sheet

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a student teaching performance appraisal form used to evaluate student teachers in the College of Education at MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology in the Philippines. The form assesses student teachers across 7 categories on a scale of 100-95 (Excellent) to 79-75 (Needs Improvement). The categories cover the teacher's personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methodology, classroom management, questioning skills, and communication skills. At the end, overall ratings are provided for each category and a general average rating. Space for comments and suggestions is also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    118 views3 pages

    Demonstration Rating Sheet

    Uploaded by

    Jay Mark Reponte
    This document contains a student teaching performance appraisal form used to evaluate student teachers in the College of Education at MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology in the Philippines. The form assesses student teachers across 7 categories on a scale of 100-95 (Excellent) to 79-75 (Needs Improvement). The categories cover the teacher's personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methodology, classroom management, questioning skills, and communication skills. At the end, overall ratings are provided for each category and a general average rating. Space for comments and suggestions is also included.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    MSU – ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

    COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    Department of Professional Education
    Iligan City, Philippines

    Student’s Teaching Demonstration Performance Appraisal


    (Adapted: Student Teaching Handbook by Atienza et.al., 2000)

    Student Teacher : Date :


    Subject Taught : Grade Level :
    Subject Matter : Time Duration :

    100-95 94-90 89-85 84-80 79-75 Rating


    E P S D NI
    I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
    A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
    B. The teacher is free from mannerisms that tend
    to disturb the student’s attention.
    C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to
    command respect and attention.
    D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm.
    E. The teacher reports to his/her class on time.
    F. The teacher displays self-confidence.
    Section Rating
    II. LESSON PLANNING
    A. Lesson plan is well-prepared.
    B. There is congruence between:
    1. objective and subject matter
    2. objective and teaching procedure
    3. objective and formative test
    4. objective and assignment
    Section Rating
    III. LEARNING CONTENT
    A. The teacher demonstrates in depth knowledge
    of the subject matter.
    B. He/She is able to relate lessons to actual life
    situations.
    C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and understanding
    in the field.
    D. Give sufficient and concrete examples to create
    meaningful learning experiences.
    Section Rating
    IV. TEACHING METHODOLOGY
    A. Method/s used was/were suited to the needs
    and capabilities of the students.
    B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt
    his/her method to the students’ capabilities.
    C. Visual aids and other examples were used to
    illustrate the lesson.
    D. The teacher provides appropriate motivation.
    E. Ensures students participation and interactive
    learning situations
    F. Addresses individual differences and employs
    learning styles for multiple intelligences.
    G. Uses and integrates appropriate technology in
    teaching and learning processes and in
    managing, evaluating, and improving
    instruction.
    H. The teacher made effective use of the formative
    test after teaching.
    I. Assesses lesson to determine desired outcomes
    within the allotted time
    Section Rating
    V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
    A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
    1. Attendance
    2. Assignment/Homework /Agreement
    3. Practice exercise
    4. Group work/projects
    5. Passing in and out of the room
    6. Correcting, distributing, and collecting
    paper
    B. Order and discipline were present in the
    classroom.
    C. Visual aids were within easy reach of the
    teacher during his/her teaching.
    Section Rating
    VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS
    A. The teacher’s questioning skill stimulates
    discussion in different ways such as:
    1. probing for learner’s understanding
    2. helping students articulate their ideas and
    thinking process
    3. promote risk-taking and problem solving
    4. facilitate factual recall
    5. encourage convergent and divergent thinking
    6. stimulate curiosity
    7. helps students to ask questions
    Section Rating
    VII. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
    A. The teacher spoke clearly with a well-
    modulated voice.
    B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
    C. Correct responses were given by the students
    through the teacher’s skillful questioning.
    D. He/She observed correct pronunciation.
    E. The board work of the teacher was free from
    error in grammar and spelling.
    F. The teacher’s handwriting on the board and
    lesson plan was legible enough to be read and
    understood.
    Section Rating
    Legend:
    E – Excellent P – Proficient S – Satisfactory D – Developing NI – Needs Improvement
    COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS
    1. _______________________________________________________________________________________
    2. _______________________________________________________________________________________
    3. _______________________________________________________________________________________
    4. _______________________________________________________________________________________
    5. _______________________________________________________________________________________
    6. _______________________________________________________________________________________
    7. _______________________________________________________________________________________

    SUMMARY OF RATINGS

    I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY ______________________


    II. LESSON PLANNING ______________________
    III. LEARNING CONTENT ______________________
    IV. TEACHING METHODOLOGY ______________________
    V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT ______________________
    VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS ______________________
    VII. COMMUNICATION SKILLS ______________________

    GENERAL AVERAGE RATING ______________________


    DESCRIPTIVE RATING ______________________
    OBSERVER:

    ___________________________________________
    Supervising Teacher

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy