MLT Bacteriology Case PDF
MLT Bacteriology Case PDF
MLT Bacteriology Case PDF
The case description on this page and its follow-up discussion presented
elsewhere in this issue is the 23rd in a series of articles presenting clinical
microbiology cases that will appear in this journal. Readers should study the case de-
scription below and formulate their own answers to the questions posed. After coming
up with a solution to the problem, turn to page 56 in this issue and read the Case Follow-
up and Discussion.This is followed by Questions for STEP Participants on page 59.
Joel E. Mortensen, PhD, MLT(AMT), Series Editor
At this point, the major consideration was a possible Streptococcus spp. A Gram
stain, catalase test, and latex streptococcus grouping test to identify Lancefield
streptococcal groups A, B, C, D, F and G were performed. The microorganism,
however, was a pleomorphic small, v-shaped, branching Gram-positive bacillus
(Fig. 2), catalase-negative, and unreactive with the Lancefield streptococcal
grouping antibodies. The Vitek 2 bioMerieux system reported the
microorganism as an UNIDENTIFIED organism. In the meantime, the patient
was treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and daily wound dressing. He
promptly improved after 6 days of antibacterial therapy, remained afebrile with
improvement of nausea and vomiting, and continued antibiotics for an
additional week after discharge. Which bacteria should be considered at this
time and what should be done with the isolate at this point?