Civil Society Movements - For Merge
Civil Society Movements - For Merge
Civil Society Movements - For Merge
Initially, Civil Society used to be defined as a political community i.e. a society governed by
the government, law and authority. In contemporary times, however, Civil Society is
distinguished from the state and political community. It means nongovernmental, private,
voluntarily organized associations or institutions of the people, through which they try to
secure their needs, desires and objectives.
Such associations and organisations work independently of the government. Civil Society
even opposes the wrong politics, decisions and projects of the government. In doing so the
civil society depends upon constitutional, peaceful and legal method of action.
The term Civil Society is used to collectively refer to the voluntary organizations corporate
bodies, socially active groups, and firms working in each society.
"Civil Society is the set of intermediate associations which is neither the state nor the family,
but which plays an active and positive role in social, economic, and cultural activities."
According to Andrew Heywood, "Civil society refers to "a realm of associations, business,
interest groups, classes’ families and so on."
Civil Society includes all private organizations of the people. Press, professional associations
of the people, Human Right groups and organizations, voluntary social service organizations,
and in fact, all NGOs working in society.
In other words, Civil Society refers to the effective presence of non- governmental
autonomous groups and associations, business groups, interest groups, trade unions,
voluntary social service organizations, in fact, all non-governmental organizations, and
groups working for securing public interests and welfare by their self efforts.
3. Civil Society is, however, neither opposed to state nor to society. On the contrary it works
as a supplementary to each of the two. It, however, works in an organized and autonomous
way.
4. A healthy and efficient democratic system needs and integrates civil society, society and
state.
6. Both Liberalism and Marxism accept and advocate the role of Civil Society but each
conceptualizes it in a different wa
Contractualist philosopher Thomas Hobbes though had not used the term “civil society”, yet
he referred to the area where the individual can freely lead his life without creating any
obstruction for the sovereign power. John Lock referred it as a state where men enter to form
a government which can protect them against the uncertainties of the state of nature. For
Hegel, civil society is a voluntarily organised body that is intermediate between the state and
the family.
People here live with their self-interest and personal choice and with minimum constraints.
Though traditionally civil society and state were treated synonymously, Hegel separated these
terms for the first time. Civil society has been described as a primary source for the civic
virtues required to maintain a stable polity. Though it is a source of community and solidarity
and also a sphere of social homogeneity and identity, yet it is also a sphere of plurality,
diversity and conflict.
The values of civil society are those of political participation and state accountability. Thus, it
provides the necessary basis for participation in formal political institutions. The institutions
Within the civil society, individuals enjoy enforceable rights of free expression, freedom to
form associations, formulation of opinions and freedom to dissent. Civil society is a vital pre-
condition for the existence of democracy. For this reason, authoritarian states attempt to stifle
civil society.
The existence of civil society does not mean that it always challenges the state authority.
Thomas Paine argued that the power of the state must be restricted in favour of the civil
society as individuals are having a natural propensity for society which exists before the
formation of the states.
Civil society is not a political society. Despite the dissolution of the government, the civil
society continues to satisfy the interest of the individuals. Antonio Gramsci interpreted the
civil society in terms of the political and cultural hegemony where a social group exercise
control over the whole of the society as the ethical content of the state.
Though the existence of civil society is essential, yet is not a sufficient pre-condition for the
existence of democracy. Gramsci suggested how a hegemonies civil society can support the
state in controlling social practices. The accountability of the state can be ensured only when
the civil society is self-conscious, vibrant and active. An inactive civil society- leads to
unresponsive states. Thus, the relationship between the state and the civil society is a mutual
one based on the principle of reciprocity.
western values entered in this society. There was a conflict between the modernity and age
old traditional values. While some blindly followed the modern life of the west, revivalists
like Dayananda and Vivekananda wanted to reform the Hindu tradition making it suitable to
modern period.
Western values of liberalism, individualism, and constitutionalism made its inroad to Indian
society by which it became politically conscious and vigiland. British imperial rule
economically ruined India and weakened the rising Indian nationalism with the policy of
‘divide and rule.’ The germ of communalism entered into the society finding its naked
expression in post-independent India. After independence, the new ruling class wanted to
make India prosperous at par with other developed nations of the world.
People want to protect their interest through group engagements and interactions in post-
independent India. Indian civil society becomes more effective with the civic virtues and also
acquires the capability to organize itself independent of state authority. Individual rights and
liberties are safeguarded; a number of autonomous associations are created within the state.
The harmonious co-existence of both the state and the civil society safeguards the interest of
both the government and the citizens. The democratic nature of the Indian civil society is
There is occasional rise of conflict between the civil society and the state as the demands and
expectation of the society are not fulfilled. Occasionally, state also ignores the interests of the
majority and intervenes into the sphere of the civil society. As a welfare state, India is
expected to ensure social justice along with economic growth. A number of schemes are
adopted for the eradication of poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, malnutrition etc. With the
expansion of state functions, too much bureaucratization becomes the order of the system
with its ugly faces of corruption, red tapism etc. Indian civil society raises its voice against
such development.
More and more importance is given to decentralisation of power, people’s participation in the
Bibliography http://www.preservearticles.com/2014051433460/civil-society-meaning-
features-and-role-of-civil-society.html
http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/civil-society-and-social-movements-globalizing-world
http://countrystudies.us/india/121.htm
http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/society/civil-society-in-india-and-its-role/47111
http://internationalseminar.org/XIV_AIS/TS%202/3.%20Devinder%20Singh.pdf