CHAPTER IV

RESULT, DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION

4.1 Introduction

This chapter discusses the data analysis of the 40 survey form distributed in 40

persons; 30 non-professionals and 10 professionals. Every form signifies the project

designs performance based on the filled up survey form given to the people. The form

contains ratings that will use to judge the designed project; 1 is equivalent to strongly

disagree, 2 is equivalent to disagree, 3 is equivalent to undecided, 4 is equivalent to agree

and 5 is equivalent to strongly agree. The developers needs feedback on their designed

project to know if it is working accordingly to the given instructions and procedures. Also

if problems are found or the designed project needs to be enhance and upgrade, the

developers will take an action as soon as they get the feedback. As the developers

compiling the given form, calculating the data that has been gathered and getting the result.

4.2 Recommendation

According to the results of the survey that the developers conducted on 40 persons.

Many has agreed that the designed project is proven functional, reliable, efficient and

portable. With this success, the developers is so very happy to know that the hardships and

sacrifices they take is worth a risk at all. With this result, the developers will continue to

enhance and maintain the designed project in order to meet its expectation.

4.3 Experimental

The developers tested and reworked the designed project so many times, that the

project continue to show problems that the developers started to think again on how they

should solve the problem. The developers used a basin and fill water until the basin is full,

37
they placed the designed project on the basin filled with water, they plug the adapter to the

electric outlet to see if the designed project is working, next they plunge the level 1

indicator to the water basin filled with water, they wait for the designed project to respond

and finally the designed project sends SMS to the mobile phone of one of the developers.

4.4 Performance Analyze:

In this part, the developers evaluate and analyze the comparison of the level

performance according to number of the system by the distributed survey form. The

developers discuss the different level or the criteria and discuss how you will grade it. The

developers show that there are important differences between methods in terms of

modeling effort and accuracy by highlight some modeling difficulties and analyzing pitfalls

of the different approaches.

4.50 – 5.00 5 Strongly Agree

3.50 – 4.49 4 Agree

2.50 – 3.49 3 Undecided

1.50 – 2.49 2 Disagree

0.00 – 1.49 1 Strongly Disagree

Table 4.4 Interpretation on the Gathered Data

Based on the evaluated result of the survey form most of the respondents gave their

satisfaction rating from 5 is the highest at 1 is the lowest satisfactory of the respondents.

38
The total of Functionality has got the mean rating of 4.45, Reliability got the mean rating

of 4.97, Efficiency got the mean rating of 4.22, Maintainability got the mean rating of

2.92, and the Portability got the mean rating of 4.00.

4.4.1 Mean Rating According to Functionality

Criteria Mean Interpretation

The prototype functions according 4.52 Agree

to the interpretation.

The prototype can produce the 4.38 Agree

expected outputs in a given period

of time.

The prototype is easy to use and 4.34 Agree

operate.

The prototype gives convenience 4.49 Agree

to the user every time they use it.

Overall Weight Mean 4.43 Agree

Table 4.4.1 Mean Rating According to Functionality

Based on the evaluated result of the survey from most of the respondents gave their

satisfaction rating from 5 is the highest at 1 is the lowest satisfactory of the respondents.

The Functionality has the total mean rating of 4.45,

4.4.2 Mean Rating According to Reliability

39
 Criteria Mean Interpretation

The prototype can withstand the 4.44 Agree

intended operation. (continuous or

intermittent)

The prototype is reliable in terms 4.22 Agree

of strength, capacity and

performance.

The degree of security can be 4.65 Agree

obtained when using the prototype.

There is a consistency on outputs. 4.58 Agree

The prototype can satisfy the 4.21 Agree

needed outputs of the user.

Overall Weight Mean 4.42 Agree

Table 4.4.2 Mean Rating According to Reliability

Based on the evaluated result of the survey from most of the respondents gave their

satisfaction rating from 5 is the highest at 1 is the lowest satisfactory of the respondents.

The Reliability got the total mean rating of 4.97.

4.4.3 Mean Rating According to Efficiency

Criteria Mean Interpretation

40
 The prototype meets the user’s 4.51 Agree

objective and requirements.

The prototype can be used to its 4.42 Agree

maximum design and capacity.

The prototype can respond to the 4.54 Agree

needs of the user.

The prototype can contribute for the 4.62 Agree

development of the same model of

technology.

The prototype can enhance 4.41 Agree

individual’s learning.

Overall Weight Mean 4.50 Agree

Table 4.4.3 Mean Rating According to Efficiency

Based on the evaluated result of the survey from most of the respondents gave their

satisfaction rating from 5 is the highest at 1 is the lowest satisfactory of the respondents.

The Efficiency got the total mean rating of 4.22.

4.4.4 Mean Rating According to Maintainability

Criteria Mean Interpretation

41
 The prototype can operate 4.21 Agree

accurately with minimum

maintenance.

The prototype can be adapted to any 4.38 Agree

changes in its working condition.

Troubleshooting/repair can be done 4.35 Agree

easily by the user.

Overall Weight Mean 4.31 Agree

Table 4.4.4 Mean Rating According to Maintainability

Based on the evaluated result of the survey from most of the respondents gave their

satisfaction rating from 5 is the highest at 1 is the lowest satisfactory of the respondents.

The Maintainability got the total mean rating of 2.92.

4.4.5 Mean Rating According to Portability

Criteria Mean Interpretation

The prototype is machine 4.58 Agree

independent.

It is transferable to any other 4.42 Agree

medium.

The system is easy to install. 4.51 Agree

42
 It is compatible with other 4.43 Agree

PC’s

Overall Weight Mean 4.51 Agree

Table 4.4.5 Mean Rating According to Portability

Based on the evaluated result of the survey from most of the respondents gave their

satisfaction rating from 5 is the highest at 1 is the lowest satisfactory of the respondents.

The Portability got the weigh mean of 4.00

4.5 Evaluation Summary

CRITERIA MEAN INTERPRETATION

I. Functionality 4.43 Agree

II. Reliability 4.42 Agree

III. Efficiency 4.50 Agree

IV. Maintenance 4.31 Agree

V. Portability 4.51 Agree

Overall Weight Mean 4.43 Agree

Table 4.5 Summary of Evaluated Overall Mean

In this table, the overall weighted mean is 4.51 which indicates the

interpretation to agree. With this result, the developers who develop this designed project

is overwhelmed by the ratings that the designed project gets in surveying 40 persons.

43